AFRL Multiple Award Contract (AMAC) – Air Force Research Laboratory

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) AMAC program establishes a multiple-award IDIQ contract vehicle enabling qualified U.S. companies to compete for future AFRL-funded science and technology (S&T) research task orders. There is no funding awarded at the base contract level; funding is provided only through competitively awarded task orders after selection. Proposals are due February 27, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

There is no fixed funding amount awarded at the base IDIQ level. Each awardee is guaranteed a minimum of $500 over the life of the contract. Actual funding is awarded later through individual task or delivery orders, which may range from small research efforts to very large programs. The estimated ceiling value across all AMAC contracts is $10 billion.

How does the program work?

AMAC is not a single grant but a long-term contract vehicle that allows AFRL to rapidly fund unclassified science and technology research through future task orders. If you meet the criteria, you will receive the long-term contract vehicle. Companies selected to the AMAC vehicle become eligible to compete for AFRL-funded projects covering basic and applied research, technology development, modeling and simulation, manufacturing, experimentation, integration, and technology transition. Importantly, there is no funding awarded upfront—all funding is issued later through individual task orders, each with its own scope, budget, and performance period.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond task-order funding, AMAC awardees gain several indirect but material benefits:

• Government Validation and Credibility: Selection confirms AFRL validation of your company’s technical experience as a prime contractor.

• Long-Term AFRL Access: Awardees are eligible to compete for AFRL task orders for up to 8 years.

• Increased Visibility: Awardees become part of AFRL’s active R&D contractor ecosystem.

• Non-Dilutive Growth: Task-order funding enables technology maturation without equity dilution.

• Stronger Strategic Positioning: Proven AFRL work can enhance acquisition, partnership, and future DoD contracting opportunities.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Proposals must be submitted by February 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. Base IDIQ awards are made after evaluation. Funding is only received after winning individual task orders, which may be issued at any point during the contract’s ordering period.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding for task orders comes from AFRL directorates and partner agencies using AFRL as the contracting vehicle. The base AMAC contract itself does not carry dedicated funding.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include U.S.-based companies that can demonstrate qualifying prime contractor experience in federal S&T research. This includes:

• Small businesses

• Large businesses

• Joint ventures

• Universities and non-profits

Foreign-owned or foreign-influenced companies are not eligible unless formally approved through the National Industrial Security Program.

What companies will receive the contracting vehicle?

To receive an AMAC award, offerors must:

• Be a responsible source under FAR Part 9

• Submit a compliant proposal following Section L instructions

• Achieve a validated minimum score of 1,000 points in the self-scoring technical experience evaluation here

• Demonstrate prime contractor experience in AFRL technical Areas of Interest

• Receive an Acceptable rating for both Technical Experience and Small Business Participation Commitment

There is no price competition at the base contract level.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. Key restrictions include:

• No classified work is permitted under the AMAC base contract

• Only prime contractor experience counts toward technical scoring

• Subcontractor experience does not qualify for scoring

How can BW&CO help?

The AMAC solicitation is fundamentally a compliance-driven, pass/fail process. AFRL has stated that any offeror who submits a fully compliant proposal and meets the minimum technical threshold will receive an AMAC contract—while even minor non-compliance can result in elimination, regardless of technical merit. BW&CO helps ensure your proposal is structured correctly, fully compliant, and strategically positioned so you don’t lose this opportunity due to avoidable errors.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See the solicitation here.

Chemical and Biological Technologies Fundamental Research BAA – Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is accepting rolling submissions through 2034 for fundamental research projects that advance chemical and biological defense capabilities. This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) supports basic and applied research addressing counter–weapons of mass destruction (C-WMD) challenges, with a current white paper deadline of March 2, 2026 for Topic Areas B1–B6.

How much funding would I receive?

$300,000 to $5 million depending on the topic.

What could I use the funding for?

For research and development that aligns with the topics below. For more details on each topic click here.

B1. Deriving Human Physiological Endpoints via Microphysiological Systems (MPS): Bridging the Gap for Predictive Translation

DTRA is seeking fundamental research that advances microphysiological systems (organs-on-a-chip) to derive reliable, human-relevant physiological endpoints that can be translated into real-world exposure detection. Projects should develop standardized, measurable physiological signals across multi-organ MPS platforms and link those signals to in-vivo human responses, particularly for early detection of chemical and biological exposures. Emphasis is placed on novel sensing technologies, data integration, and predictive algorithms rather than therapeutics or animal studies. Read full description here.

B2. Self-Improving AI Systems for Adaptive Defense

This topic funds research into AI systems that can autonomously adapt to new chemical and biological threats without human retraining. DTRA is specifically interested in self-modifying AI architectures that can safely update their own models, structures, or code while maintaining formally verified performance and safety guarantees. Projects must focus on foundational AI theory and methods—such as formal verification, containment, and meta-learning—rather than static or manually retrained detection systems. Read full description here.

B3. Quantum-Enhanced Topological Data Analysis for Chemical and Biological Defense

DTRA seeks interdisciplinary research combining quantum computing and topological data analysis to identify complex patterns in high-dimensional chemical and biological data that classical methods cannot detect. The goal is to enable earlier warning of engineered or novel threats, improve pathogen classification, and accelerate countermeasure discovery. Projects should focus on developing quantum-enabled analytical frameworks and demonstrating clear advantages over classical computational approaches. Read full description here.

B4. Advanced Repellent Materials for Omniphobic Resistance (ARMOR)

This topic supports fundamental research into durable, PFAS-free repellent materials for textiles that resist chemical and biological threats, oils, and industrial contaminants. DTRA is looking for new material chemistries and surface architectures—particularly reentrant or textured surfaces—that achieve strong oil repellency, mechanical durability, and safety for skin contact. Research should emphasize materials science, characterization methods, and performance against chemical simulants rather than full protective suit development. Read full description here.

B5. Sensing Engineered Chemical and Biological Threats with Synthetic Biology Designs

DTRA is funding early-stage research into synthetic biology-based sensing materials that enable rapid, adaptable detection of engineered or emerging biological threats. Projects should integrate computational design, AI/ML, and synthetic biology to create novel affinity reagents or sensing elements that outperform traditional antibodies in speed, adaptability, or stability. The focus is on proof-of-concept platforms and fundamental sensing science, not deployable sensor systems. Read full description here.

B6. Free-Standing Films Used as Detection Wipes

This topic seeks fundamental research on free-standing, self-indicating films that can be used as low-cost detection wipes for chemical threats on surfaces. DTRA is interested in understanding the structural, optical, and electrical properties of cross-linked polymer films embedded with non-dye-based recognition elements that change color upon exposure to chemical agents or simulants. Research should prioritize material synthesis, reproducibility, environmental robustness, and early prototype integration rather than full system fielding. Read full description here.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are significant indirect benefits to receiving a DTRA fundamental research award:

Government Validation and Credibility: Selection by DTRA signals strong technical credibility and alignment with national counter-WMD priorities, which can accelerate trust with defense partners and future government sponsors.

Enhanced Visibility Within the Defense Research Community: Awardees are part of DTRA’s extramural research ecosystem, increasing exposure to DoD laboratories, academic collaborators, and future funding opportunities.

Nondilutive Technology Maturation: By advancing early-stage science with nondilutive funding, companies can de-risk core technology while preserving equity and strengthening long-term exit potential.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

For Topic Areas B1–B6, pre-application white papers are due March 2, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST. Submissions follow a two-phase process, with invited full proposals submitted after successful white paper review.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Department of Defense through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under CFDA 12.351.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is defined at the topic level. In general, the BAA supports extramural performers conducting basic or applied research, including universities, industry, and other research organizations, subject to topic-specific requirements. is cost-shared by non-government sources

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive projects typically:

• Address high-impact chemical or biological defense challenges relevant to C-WMD

• Advance fundamental scientific knowledge or revolutionary technical approaches

• Align with early-stage research (TRLs 1–4)

• Demonstrate strong scientific rigor and feasibility

• Fit within DTRA’s stated thrust areas or published topic needs

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Pre-application coordination is generally required before submitting a white paper, and submissions without coordination may not be reviewed. Proprietary product development and later-stage commercialization activities are outside the scope of this announcement.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most first-time applicants (without any assistance from BW&CO) should plan for 40–60 hours of effort to prepare the white paper over 8–12 weeks, including technical writing, budget preparation, and internal reviews.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for $4000 Initial Fee for the white paper.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Learn more about the program here.

Compact Oxygen Generation Medical Devices (COGM / COGM-A) – Defense Health Agency (DHA)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Defense Health Agency (DHA) is soliciting prototype proposals to develop compact medical oxygen generation devices for use in austere and expeditionary military environments. This Other Transaction Authority (OTA) program supports the development of FDA-cleared oxygen generation systems for battlefield care and aeromedical evacuation. Proposals are due March 6, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Estimated $1-$2 million. The RPP does not specify a minimum or maximum award size. The government anticipates making multiple prototype OTA awards, with funding incrementally obligated over the period of performance. Total award size will depend on proposed scope, schedule, and cost realism.

What could I use the funding for?

The DHA needs to provide medical oxygen solutions in austere environments to treat service members with compromised lung function or injuries requiring oxygen therapy. The WEMT PMO is developing multiple oxygen generation and delivery systems through its Portable Oxygen (O2) program. This program aims to support casualties across all care settings, including evacuation platforms (Roles of Care 1-3 and en route). Development and approval of candidate solutions will adhere to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other relevant regulatory and industry best practices.

This effort focuses on developing two expeditionary, easy-to-maintain oxygen generation devices meeting Joint Enroute Care Equipment Test Standard and airworthiness standards:

FOCUS AREA #1: Compact Oxygen Generation, Medical (COGM)

• Priority: High

• Primary Use: Role 1 (but still usable across all Roles, including en route care)

• Capabilities: Adjustable flow rate (3-7 lpm minimum, 15 lpm desired) for use with nasal cannulas, face masks, and nebulizers.

• Target Timeline: Regulatory approvals by 2029, procurement by 2031 (shorter timeline preferred)

FOCUS AREA #2: Compact Oxygen Generation, Medical – At Altitude (COGM-A)

• Primary Use: Aeromedical evacuation platforms

• Capabilities: Similar to COGM, but with adjustable flow up to 15 lpm and high-pressure output for ventilators.

• Target Timeline: Regulatory approvals by 2030, procurement by 2032 (shorter timeline preferred)

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, awardees gain several strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Selection by the Defense Health Agency signals strong technical credibility and alignment with DoD operational medical priorities—often accelerating trust with military customers, primes, and investors.

Nondilutive Technology Advancement:
This OTA enables companies to mature medical devices without equity dilution, preserving cap table value while advancing toward procurement readiness.

Follow-On Production Potential:
Successful prototypes may lead directly to a follow-on production OTA, reducing acquisition friction and shortening the path to revenue.

Enhanced Defense Market Visibility:
Awardees become part of DHA’s Warfighter Expeditionary Medicine ecosystem, increasing exposure across DoD medical and acquisition communities..

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

1. Questions Due: February 6, 2026

2. Proposals Due: March 6, 2026 (5:00 PM EST)

3. Period of Performance:

   • Up to ~24 months for COGM

   • Up to ~36 months for COGM-A

Where does this funding come from?

This program is funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, administered through the Defense Health Agency (DHA) using Prototype Other Transaction Authority (10 U.S.C. §4022).

Who is eligible to apply?

To be eligible, proposals must meet at least one of the following OTA statutory conditions:

• Include a nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent

• All significant participants are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors

• At least one-third of total project cost is cost-shared by non-government sources

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals are evaluated on three primary factors:

• Strength and feasibility of the technical approach to meeting SOO requirements

• Credibility of the management and execution plan, including regulatory and manufacturing readiness

• Cost realism and completeness of the proposed budget

Projects starting near TRL 4 with a clear path to FDA clearance and military deployment are strongly aligned.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposals must comply with FDA medical device regulations

• Foreign collaborators require additional justification

• Participation in malign foreign talent programs is prohibited

• Cost sharing rules apply if nontraditional or small business criteria are not met

• Files must be submitted exactly as instructed; noncompliance may result in elimination

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most first-time applicants (without any assistance from BW&CO) should plan for 120–200 hours of effort over 8–12 weeks, including technical writing, budget preparation, and internal reviews.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for $13000 Initial Fee + 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Learn more about the program here.

Strengthening America’s Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base (SAMDIB) – Cornerstone Consortium (DoD)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Cornerstone Consortium is accepting white papers on a rolling basis under the Strengthening America’s Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base (SAMDIB) initiative to fund prototype projects that enhance U.S. defense manufacturing capacity, workforce resilience, and supply chain security. Awards are made via Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) to eligible consortium members to address priority industrial base sectors supporting DoD mission readiness. White papers may be submitted anytime while the CIR is open, with evaluations conducted periodically based on Government need.

How much funding would I receive?

$2 million to $200 million. The Government does not disclose a fixed award size or total budget for this initiative but past awards reflect a range of levels from $2 million to $200 million. Funding levels vary by project scope, technical maturity, and negotiated milestones, and multiple awards may be made subject to availability of funds.

What could I use the funding for?

Cornerstone accelerates research, development, prototyping, demonstration, qualification and integration of manufacturing capabilities and capacities into the US Industrial Base and supply chains. Cornerstone integrates the diverse and currently fragmented collection of industry sectors across a range of manufacturing disciplines to ensure Industrial Base resiliency and assurance and a robust manufacturing innovation ecosystem. To this end, the technical focus of Cornerstone shall be comprised of, but not limited to, these Sector and Requirement Focus Areas:

Sector Area 1: Aircraft

Fighters, bombers, cargo, transport aircraft, combat/combat support/combat services helicopters, unmanned aircraft systems/vehicles and the associated components, equipment, networks and personnel to control unmanned aircraft.

Sector Area 2: Radar and Electronic Warfare

Semiconductor, captive monolithic microwave integrated circuits, and the related microelectronic manufacturing/assembly facilities required for continual upgrade of military radar, electronic warfare, and other related equipment.

Sector Area 3: Shipbuilding

Aircraft carriers, submarines, surface combatants, amphibious warfare, combat logistics force, and command and support vessels.

Sector Area 4: Ground Vehicles

Tactical vehicles, armored multi-purpose vehicles, and the associated products required for improvements to legacy systems such as the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, M1 series tank, High-Mobility Multi-Purpose Vehicle and Light Armored Vehicle.

Sector Area 5: Soldier Systems

Personal protective and individual systems such as clothing, boots, helmets, parachutes, chemical protective clothing, sensors and lasers, body armor, small arms, shelters, rations, clean water, laundry, and food services.

Sector Area 6: Space

Satellites, launch services, ground services, satellite components & subsystems, networks, engineering services, payloads, propulsion, and electronics.

Sector Area 7: Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN)

Passive protection, contamination avoidance and mitigation measures taken and the applicable associated equipment used in situations where CBRN hazards may be present.

Sector Area 8: Critical Minerals & Materials

Minerals, materials, production technology, and the associated international trade supply chains that are integral to the U.S. manufacturing base and the Nation’s overall economic and national security.

Sector Area 9: Machine Tools

Machines for shaping, machining, cutting, boring, shearing, extruding, turning and the associated tools/fixtures required for holding/constraining/guiding the work piece being machined.

Sector Area 10: Cyber for the Industrial Base

A body of technologies, processes and practices designed to protect networks, computers, and programs essential to military communication and data systems from being compromised.

Sector Area 11: Optics

Enhanced night vision goggles, thermal weapons sights, monocular night vision devices, aviator’s night vision imaging systems, sniper night sights, multifunction aiming lights, mini integrated pointed illuminator modules, integrated laser white light pointers, individual and crew served weapons lights, aircrew laser pointers, green laser interdiction systems, family of weapons sights, laser target locators, lightweight laser designator rangefinders, small tactical optical rifle mounts, micro-laser rangefinders, and joint effects targeting systems.

Sector Area 12: Advanced Technology and Advanced Manufacturing

Items of equipment developed with the most advanced technology available and used by the majority of the economy. Advanced technology and advanced manufacturing advances the state of the art and, therefore, has the most growth potential.

Sector Area 13: Electronics

Consumer electronics, computers, automotive, industrial/medical equipment, telecommunications, and aero/defense. The industrial base consists of engineering companies that design integrated circuits (IC); front end companies that manufacture ICs; back end manufacturers that assemble ICs into packages; IC vendors that design and market ICs; systems integration companies that combine ICs into electronic systems; and others as applicable.

Sector Area 14: Command, Control, Communication, and Computers (C4)

Major defense acquisition programs and major automated information systems that integrate doctrine, procedures, organizational structures, personnel, equipment, facilities and communication designed to support commanders.

Sector Area 15: Munitions and Missiles

Smart bombs, tactical cruise, air-to-air, air-to-ground, and surface-to-surface missiles as well as dumb bombs, ammunition, mortars, and large caliber rounds.

Sector Area 16: Industrial Base and Manufacturing Skills

Collaborative efforts to engage the highest industrial, academic, and Government technical resources to define and address strategic manufacturing value chain vulnerabilities and program specific technical issues in support of the defense industrial base.

Sector Area 17: Trusted Capital

U.S. or NTIB Integration-partner capital. Efforts will focus on identifying relevant sources of innovation, identifying and leveraging trustworthy sources of capital, and bringing together the right sources of innovation with the right trustworthy sources of capital to accelerate financial arrangements that obviate adversary strategies.

Sector Area 18: Special Operations Forces (SOF) Operational Requirements

Capabilities that rapidly explore any relevant technologies that provide material solutions for Electronic Warfare, Intelligence/Surveillance/Reconnaissance, Computer Network Operations, C4, Weapons, Visual Augmentation Systems, Fire Support Systems, SOF Enablers, and Mobility Systems.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct nondilutive funding, Cornerstone awards offer several strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility: Selection through a DoD-managed OTA consortium signals strong alignment with national defense industrial base priorities and increases trust with primes, partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility Across DoD: Awardees gain exposure to multiple DoD programs and stakeholders through a standing, Government-managed consortium vehicle.

Faster Contracting and Flexible Terms: OTAs allow negotiated data rights, milestone-based payments, and streamlined acquisition compared to FAR-based contracts.

Follow-On Production Potential: Successful prototype projects may be eligible for non-competitive follow-on production OTAs or transition to FAR-based production contracts, though follow-on awards are not guaranteed.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

White papers (15 pages) may be submitted at any time while the CIR is active. Submissions are typically evaluated within three months of receipt. If invited, full proposal timelines are set by the Government based on project complexity. Funding is received through negotiated milestone payments after OTA award.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment (IBAS) Program and executed by Army Contracting Command – Rock Island in support of DEVCOM Chemical Biological Center.

Who is eligible to apply?

Only Cornerstone Consortium members with an executed Consortium Management Agreement, active SAM registration, and favorable responsibility status may apply. Eligible organizations include:

• Small and large U.S. businesses

• Non-traditional defense contractors

• Traditional defense contractors

• Academic institutions

• Federally Funded Research and Development Centers

• Private capital entities

Foreign participation is restricted and approved only on a case-by-case basis.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive selections prioritize projects that:

• Address one or more priority industrial base sectors with clear DoD relevance

• Demonstrate strong technical merit and feasibility

• Strengthen domestic manufacturing capacity or supply chain resilience

• Present reasonable cost sharing and milestone plans

• Offer innovative or differentiated technical approaches

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. Key restrictions include limits on foreign participation, export-controlled information handling, cybersecurity compliance (NIST SP 800-171), restrictions on non-U.S. research programs, and Government Purpose Rights for technical data unless otherwise negotiated.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most first-time applicants should expect 80–120 hours of effort over 8–12 weeks, including technical writing, budget preparation, and internal reviews.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the 15 page white paper for a flat fee of $9,000. Upon invitation, full proposal is an additional $9000 + 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Learn more about the program here.

Carderock BAA - NAVY

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) is soliciting proposals under its FY26 Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for basic and applied research aligned with Navy ship, submarine, and maritime systems priorities. Awards are made as grants or cooperative agreements, with a minimum award size of $500,000 and no stated maximum. The BAA supports research across digital ecosystems, hydrodynamics, naval platform integrity, ship and submarine design, signature management, and unmanned systems. Proposals must be submitted by February 27, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Individual awards vary by technical scope, merit, and fund availability. The BAA lists a minimum award size of $500,000, with no stated maximum award ceiling. NSWCCD may make multiple awards, and funding levels depend on proposal quality and available funds.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding may be used for basic and applied research in the following areas:

Digital Ecosystems

• High speed, intelligent, data-driven decision making for complex operations

• Data discovery, information and knowledge management

• Rapid adaptable policy and enforcement for digital environments

Hydrodynamics

• Computational hydrodynamic tools

• Seakeeping and loads in extreme seas

• Maneuvering and control

• Maneuvering in waves

• Cavitation

• Hull-propulsor interaction

• Hydrodynamic modeling of operations: in an ice slurry; multi-body interactions; propulsor hull system optimization; appendage characterization and scaling; near-surface and near-shore maneuvering and control modeling development

Naval Platform Integrity

• Naval metals and alloys; structural composites; corrosion resistant materials; and/or high-temperature ceramics

• Manufacturing, including additive and other advanced manufacturing, and the relationship between processing, microstructure and materials properties, including Modelling & Simulation

• Structural assessment and monitoring

• Weapons effects and ship protection

• Non-destructive testing and/or inspection

• Maritime lethality

• Structural reliability

• Ship environmental treatment systems, management, and safety

• Bio-fouling and bio-fouling hydrodynamic effects

• Development of artificial intelligence and machine learning models to advance naval platform integrity

• Battery development and safety

• Naval platform energy and power

Ship and Submarine Design

• Ship/Submarine design tools

• Ship/Submarine design processes and methods

• Design evaluation/assessment capabilities

• New and non-traditional platforms

• Novel ship/submarine designs and missions

Signature Management

• Underwater and topside signatures

• Mobile sensors

Unmanned Systems

• Low-cost perception and situational awareness systems

• Autonomy and AI/ML decision making and computations

• Swarming capabilities

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are meaningful indirect benefits to winning a NSWCCD Carderock BAA award:

Government Validation and Credibility: Selection signals strong technical credibility and alignment with Navy and DoD research priorities, which can accelerate future partnerships and follow-on funding.

Nondilutive Technology Advancement: Funding supports research without equity dilution, allowing organizations to mature technology while preserving ownership.

Positioning for Follow-On Navy Opportunities: Successful research may inform future Navy programs, contracts, or applied development efforts.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The BAA is open until February 27, 2026. Proposals may be submitted at any time before that deadline. Performance is expected to begin no earlier than three months after cost proposal submission, subject to award negotiations and fund availability.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) under the Department of the Navy for basic and applied scientific research (Assistance Listing 12.300).

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include:

• Public and private institutions of higher education

• Universities (including University Affiliated Research Centers, unless restricted by contract)

• Small and large organizations

Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), Navy labs, and other DoD or civilian government laboratories are not eligible as prime applicants, though teaming arrangements may be allowed.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals are evaluated using a peer or scientific review process based on:

• Overall scientific and technical merit of the proposal

• Importance and relevance to NSWCCD programs

• Availability and affordability of funds

Technical merit is the most important factor, with cost realism and reasonableness also considered.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

This BAA is for research only and not for system acquisition or operational support services. No fee or profit is allowed. Some topics may involve export-controlled technologies, limiting participation to U.S. persons under ITAR. Intellectual property assertions must be clearly disclosed, and organizational conflicts of interest must be identified and mitigated.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive pre-proposal without assistance from BW&CO will likely take 200–250 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 + 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Read full solicitation here.

ERDC BAA - ARMY

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) is issuing a continuously open Broad Agency Announcement to fund basic, applied, and advanced research across a wide range of engineering, environmental, and defense-relevant technology areas. Awards are made on a rolling basis through cooperative agreements, subject to the availability of funds so interested companies should submit as soon as possible.

How much funding would I receive?

ERDC does not specify a standard award size. Individual awards may range from small research efforts to very large, multi-year programs, with an overall program ceiling of $1 billion. Funding levels are determined based on technical scope, relevance, and available funding within the sponsoring ERDC laboratory.

What could I use the funding for?

To be eligible for consideration and possible contract award, the technology or methodology shall be either basic research, applied research, advanced technology development not for a specific system/hardware, or demonstration and validation.

If your technology is novel and fits into one of the following Areas of Interest, you could potentially be funded:

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL)

• Overview

  Research is performed in the areas of hydraulic structures such as locks, dams, outlet works, control gates, stilling basins, spillways, channels, fish handling systems, and pumping stations, flood control channels, navigation channels, riverine and estuarine hydrodynamics and transport processes, groundwater, hydrology; dredgingrelated equipment, and on coastal problems related to coastal storm hazards and risk management, beach erosion, navigation, sedimentation, Regional Sediment Management, inlet stabilization, and construction, operation and maintenance of coastal structures (breakwater, jetties, groins, seawalls, etc.). Major areas of interest include coastal hydrodynamics (wind waves, tides, currents, wind related water levels); coastal sedimentation (longshore transport, inlet sedimentation); coastal geology and geomorphology; design and stability of coastal structures; erosion and storm reduction potential and life-cycle performance of natural and nature-based features; system optimization methods and performance metrics for coastal operations; coastal resiliency; and interaction of structures and coastal processes. Other activities include descriptions of coastal processes; theoretical studies; watershed and regional sediment and water systems studies; numerical and physical model techniques; data collection and analysis techniques; and development of laboratory and prototype instrumentation and equipment. The following sections contain information on these research areas and specific research thrusts.

• A. Physical Processes in Estuaries (CHL-1)

  Research in estuarine physical processes deals with the hydrodynamic and transport characteristics of water bodies located between the sea and the upland limit of tidal effects. Research is directed toward knowledge that will improve field measurements and predictions of these processes. Specific areas of required research include the following physical processes in estuaries and other tidal waters. Specific areas of required research include the following physical processes in estuaries and other tidal waters. a. The propagation of tides. b. Transport of salinity, mixing processes, stratified flows. c. Transport, erosion, and deposition of sediments, including settling velocity, aggregation of sediment, consolidation of sediment. d. Behavior and characteristics of sediment beds, including movement, consolidation, armoring, bonding, physical chemical characteristics, density, erodibility. e. Flow between aquifers and surface waters.

  Specific areas of required research include the following activities with respect to the physical processes listed. a. The effect of human activities, including dredging construction, vessel traffic, flow diversion, training, structures, and protective structures. b. Measurements of parameters that are indicative or descriptive of the processes listed in the 2nd paragraph by in-situ and remote methods in the lab and field. c. Prediction of processes listed in the 2nd paragraph by analytical methods, physical models, numerical models, and other techniques. d. Conceptual and mathematical descriptions of the processes listed in the 2nd paragraph. e. Development of materials, equipment, and methods that potentially lead to applied research that would make human activities listed safer, more economical, or more effective. f. Development of methods, techniques, and procedures that enable the treatment of an estuary as a system.

• B. Inland Hydraulic Structures (CHL-2)

  Research in hydraulic structures is related to the hydraulic performance of locks, dams, outlet works, control gates, stilling basins, spillways, channels, bank protection, riprap stability, pumping plants and other hydraulic structures, and with physical and/or numerical model studies to predict and analyze the physical water quality aspects of water resources projects. Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Conduct physical and numerical hydraulic model investigations of a wide variety of hydraulic structures to verify proposed designs and develop more effective and economical designs. b. Analyze model and prototype data and inspection of field installations to develop design criteria for hydraulic structures. c. Develop methods of correlating theoretical and experimental information with design methods used by the Corps of Engineers to improve existing procedures and provide material for inclusion in appropriate manuals. d. Develop physical and/or numerical models to predict and analyze the water quality aspects of water resources projects and design appropriate hydraulic structures to control water as well as water quantity while satisfying the desired objectives. e. Conduct research and/or develop numerical codes to advance techniques for analyzing physical aspects of water quality in lakes and rivers through a better understanding of the hydrodynamics in density-stratified environments and for improving water quality within and downstream of density-stratified reservoirs and to investigate the ability of existing and proposed water resources projects to satisfy established water quality standards. f. Conduct basic studies for development of hydraulic design and operation guidance for hydraulic structures used in inland waterways for navigation and flood control purposes, including wave forces/loads on gates (tainter, miter, etc.). g. Conduct/analyze tests, both model and prototype, of the performance of hydraulic appurtenances to flood control and navigation dams such as spillways, outlet works, energy dissipaters, and approach and exit channels, to develop design guidance that will provide structures of maximum efficiency and reliability with minimum maintenance. h. Develop innovative methods to prepare and revise engineering manuals for hydraulic design of various hydraulic structures. i. Develop innovative methods to conduct training courses on design of various hydraulic structures. j. Develop innovative methods to prepare technical reports of all work conducted.

• C. Open Channel Flow and Sedimentation (CHL-3)

  Research in open channel flow and sedimentation includes basic studies related to development of hydraulic design guidance for designing modifications to natural stream channels to provide for local flood risk reduction. Emphasis is placed on channel stability as well as channel flow capacity. Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Studies related to the development of effective methods to analyze a natural stream's response to modifications made for flood control purposes. b. Studies applicable to development of stream bank and streambed protection methods where channel instability exists. c. Studies applicable to development of sediment transport, local scour, and stream form relationships for a broad range of stream types, bed and bank materials, and meteorological and hydrological conditions. d. Collection and analysis of data that aid in evaluating existing methods and/or developing new methods to analyze channel stability for the variety of channel flow conditions and stream types existing in natural stream systems.

• D. Dredging Research (CHL-4)

  Protection and enhancement of the environment associated with operation and maintenance of navigable U.S. waterway infrastructure through dredging activities is a national priority. Dredging operations and environmental requirements of navigation projects are inseparable. Research is required to predict the time-dependent movement of non- contaminated sand and sand/silt mixtures of dredged materials placed in the nearshore zone, and all materials placed in the offshore region. The cost of dredging operations attributable to compliance with environmental windows that are determined to be over-restrictive, inconsistent, or technically unjustified can be reduced. More effective contaminated sediment characterization and management will reduce costs and enhance the reliability of methods associated with the assessment, dredging, placement, and control of sediments from navigation projects. Better instrumentation for dredge and site monitoring is required to implement automated dredge inspection and payment methods and accurately monitor placement of contaminated materials. Emerging technologies regarding innovative equipment and processes should be expeditiously introduced into the dredging arena. Enhanced ecological risk management for dredging and disposal projects through technically sound approaches for characterizing, managing, and conducting risk-based evaluations are required for expanding options regarding both contaminated and non-contaminated dredged materials.

• E. Navigation Channel Design (CHL-5)

  Research in navigation channel design involves basic research to develop design guidance for the design of new channels and modifications of existing waterways. It involves identifying maneuvering requirements in restricted waterways that affect the channel dimensions, alignment, and location of appurtenances in the navigation channel under various environmental and vessel traffic conditions. It also involves identifying the stability of the channel, maintenance requirements and designing structures that reduce or eliminate the maintenance requirements. Finally, it involves quantifying the flow and pressure fields generated by a tow or ship passing through a waterway and the related impacts on the sediment resuspension in the channel, channel border, and side channel/backwater areas. Studies involve deep and shallow draft navigation channels and physical and mathematical models. Human factors are included in research and project studies using a ship and tow simulator.

  Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Physical model investigations of a wide variety of navigation channel configurations in many environments with different type vessels to verify proposed designs and to develop more efficient and safe designs and to lower environmental impacts. b. Development and enhancement of mathematical models of vessels, both ships and push-tows, for use on the simulator to add vessel types not available or to increase the accuracy with which the model reproduces the vessels response. c. Development of methods and modeling techniques to predict the currents and sediment transport characteristics of various channel designs and integrate this with the navigation model studies, including those generated by the vessel movement. d. Development of methods and modeling techniques to predict the currents and sediment transport characteristics of various channel designs and integrate this with the navigation model studies. e. Development of methods and techniques to prepare and display visual information for the pilot on the simulator projection system. f. Development of methods and measurement equipment, techniques for measuring scale model performance in physical model navigation studies. g. Development of methods and techniques to improve the ship simulator and increase reliability of design estimates, including data and tools for ship motions, draw down, squat, ship-generated waves, and ship maneuvering. h. Development of methods and techniques for the analysis and evaluation of model results to optimize the channel design and to determine the level of safety, or conversely, risk involved with the various designs and ship transits.

• F. Computer-Aided Hydraulic Engineering (CHL-6)

  Research in this topic area develops computer-aided design tools that can be used by hydraulic engineers in planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of navigation and flood control projects. The scope includes open channel and closed conduit flows, equipment, structures, and sediment transport analysis and modeling.

• G. Groundwater (CHL-7)

  Research in groundwater is structured to enhance understanding and prediction of the flow of water and various transported constituents through the environment, including groundwater issues from contaminant remediation to levee erosion as well as surface water problems from flash flooding to nearshore coastal flows. Primary tools are computer models that solve (approximately) conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy in various physical systems. Work includes developing the numerical methods for solving these equations, writing the computer code to implement the approximations in desktop and high-performance computing environments, and applying the models as part of engineering studies to investigate processes like levee erosion and overtopping, seawater intrusion, and flow through vegetation.

• H. Hydrology (CHL-8)

  Research in this area primarily addresses military applications related to mobility, counter mobility, and water supply. Specific research involves the following areas: a. Large-scale hydrologic modeling. b. Rapid procedures for flood forecasting. c. Groundwater-surface water interaction processes. d. Multi-scale, multi-physics hydrologic modeling. e. Remote sensing and quantification of precipitation. f. Development of spatially varying precipitation hydrology models. g. Visualization of results for hydrology and dam break models. h. Interfacing with existing and new hydrology models. i. Interfacing watershed models with water quality and other environmental models.

• I. H&H GIS/Database Development (CHL-9)

  Research involves the following areas: a. Electronic Navigation Charting. b. Integration of GIS/Database and H&H models. c. Watershed management for erosion control. d. Larger River System management for flood control navigation. e. Visualization Techniques

• J. Coastal Hydrodynamics, Coastal Processes (CHL-10)

  Research in this area includes: shallow water wave estimation; forecasting and hindcasting of wind generated waves for oceanic to local regions; wave theory; statistical distribution of wave parameters; simulation of spectral and phase resolved conditions in wave basins; infragravity (free and bound) waves; nearshore currents; wave breaking; wave/current and wave structure interactions; wave and sediment interactions with natural and nature-based features; long and short waves in ports and harbors; tsunami modeling; wind generated currents; storm surge; tidal circulation; twoand three dimensional numerical simulation models (including finite difference, finite element, finite volume and curvilinear coordinate techniques); coastal meteorology; explosion generated waves; ship response to winds, currents and waves; moored ship response; mooring design and analysis, ribbon bridge hydrodynamics and turbulence.

• K. Coastal Inlets, Navigation Channels (CHL-11)

  Research includes sediment shoaling in coastal inlet channels; stability and performance of inlet channels; scour at structures; sediment transport modeling; influence of structures such as jetties and breakwaters on wave, current, and sedimentation processes. Numerical modeling of inlet hydrodynamics and sedimenttransport processes, including long-term geomorphologic evolution of inlet channels, shoals, and adjacent beaches, and the interaction with navigation structures. Nearshore placement of dredged sediment to foster wave reduction and sediment supply to adjacent beaches. Short- and long-term dune evolution in vicinity of coastal inlets. Shoreline evolution modeling and storm erosion of beaches, particularly concerning over wash and breaching near inlets; wind and wave generated sediment transport; sediment budget analysis; coastal and inlet geomorphology; and PC-, workstation-, and mainframe-based automated coastal engineering software (including relational and GIS data bases)

• L. Coastal Structure and Facility Design (CHL-12)

  Research includes development of functional and stability design criteria for coastal structures and facilities (breakwaters, seawalls, jetties, groins, harbors, marinas, etc.); wave run-up, over-topping, refraction, diffraction, transmission, reflection, etc.; design of floating breakwaters; breakwater stability; application of spectral wave conditions to coastal engineering; stability of riprap to irregular wave attack; stability and functional design of overtopped rubble mound breakwaters; scale modeling of armor unit strength; analysis of structural data for floating breakwaters; investigation of numerical structural models for floating breakwaters; development of wave run-up gage for rough and porous slopes; investigation of attenuation/mooring force models of floating breakwaters; development of materials and techniques to produce high quality breakwater model armor units; analysis of wave run-up overtopping, refraction, diffraction, transmission and/or reflection data on coastal structures and beaches and design of structures for Logistics-Over-The-Shore (LOTS) operations.

• M. Field and Laboratory Measurements, Data Collection, and Analysis (CHL13)

  This topic area includes research in technologies, instrumentation, and monitoring systems in coastal and riverine settings for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating data related to measurements of coastal waves, surface currents, water levels, water quality, sediment, and wind, primarily in the field, but also in a sediment laboratory; advanced data analysis (spectral and non-spectral) techniques; remote sensing techniques; bedload and suspended sediment transport; monitoring and evaluating technical and structural stability of coastal projects; advanced hydrographic survey techniques, field measurement of coastal processes; bathymetric survey systems.

• N. Experimental Coastal Model Equipment, Operation and Analysis (CHL-14)

  Research includes development of equipment and techniques for specialized model construction, experimental wave generation equipment, specialized data acquisition and analysis systems, advanced model operations techniques, and laboratory and scale effects in movable bed model studies.

• O. General Coastal Engineering, Coastal Geology, Dredging Investigations CHL-15)

  This topic area includes topics such as sand bypassing systems and equipment; beach fill design; coastal geology and geomorphology; functional design and evaluation of coastal works and coastal structures; methodologies to assess and track coastal resilience performance; littoral transport; coastal and offshore dredging studies; agitation dredging systems and equipment; physical monitoring of dredged material; physical processes in coastal wetlands; application of Geographic Information Systems; design of nearshore and offshore dredged material placement; evaluation of dredged material disposal sites; analysis of dredging operations management.

• P. Regional and Watershed Sediment Management (CHL-16)

  Regional Sediment Management (RSM) research is intended to provide knowledge and tools that the Corps and the Nation need for effective water resource projects. RSM implies the holistic management of sediment within systems or regions to produce environmentally and economically sustainable projects. Goals include improved project design, operation, and maintenance methods, minimized disruption of natural sediment pathways and processes, and mediation of natural processes that have adverse environmental or economic impact. The approach of the Corps research is to produce targeted R&D serving multiple Corps business areas; to employ ongoing projects’ experience (including Demonstration Projects) to provide data and lessons learned; to use enabling technologies of localscale products and tools, including those generated by other R&D programs within and outside the Corps; to generate technologies that integrate the best available knowledge on sediment behavior and regional morphology into management decision support tools for a) regional and basin scale analyses and b) evaluation of the impacts of projects and management decisions on and by long-term, large-scale sedimentation processes. A key element in ERDC research is full coordination with other organizations with sediment management or monitoring expertise.

• Q. Marine Transportation Technologies (CHL-17)

  Research in this topic area serves one of the USACE’s primary missions, to provide safe, reliable, efficient, effective, and environmentally sustainable waterborne transportation systems for movement of commerce, national security needs, and recreation. To accomplish this mission, the USACE requires R&D to facilitate tracking of vessels on inland waterways (shallow draft) and coastal ports (deep draft). Knowing what vessels are arriving, when, the commodities being carried, etc., will provide lock operators and operations project managers valuable tools to improve safety, efficiency, asset management, and help to make decisions on performance-based funding for navigation project maintenance and improvements. Work in this area focuses on software that uses the United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) Automated Identification Systems (AIS) vessel mounted transmitters which broadcasts a radio signal with the vessels name, position, heading, velocity, and a wide range of other information. Proposals are sought for developing the following: a. Capability that will take the full suite of standard CG AIS messages and provide them in near real time to the Corps facilities in the immediate area of the vessel. b. Capability to allow collection of the full suite of standard AIS messages simultaneously at all pertinent Corps Inland and Deep Draft facilities. c. Capability to customize user interface to allow the Corps operations staff to view vessels in the vicinity of the Corps facilities to make decisions on the order in which to allow commercial tows to pass through lock. d. Provide the capability for Corps facilities to transmit pertinent information to the vessels in the immediate vicinity of the Corps facilities via AIS. e. System optimization methods and performance metrics for vessel operations. Special Considerations: The level of understanding of AIS technology and signal processing, the number of successful installations of similar AIS software processing capabilities; experience with USCG staff, facilities, regulations, and procedures.

• R. Post-Wildfire Hydrologic, Sediment, and Geomorphologic Management (CHL-18)

  Post-Wildfire research is focused on improving understanding of post-fire impacts through exploitation of affordable data acquisition methods and enhancement of numerical modeling capabilities to assist with planning, management, and mitigation in post-wildfire environments. Immediately following a wildfire, vegetation is removed, organic soil horizons are reduced to ash, and hydrophobic soils combine to result in increased water and sediment discharge and debris, mud, and hyper concentrated flows. In the years following a wildfire, ecotone shifts, gully formation, and channel incision alter the hydrologic system response, resulting in dramatic changes in hydraulic and sediment impacts down system. Wildfires represent a significant perturbation to natural systems that dramatically alter the morphologic, hydrologic, and sediment regimes of impacted watersheds. The overall purpose of this area of research and development is to investigate post-wildfire impacts on hydrologic and hydraulic response, geomorphic evolution, and sedimentation, with specific research needed in the following areas: a. Studies related to cost-effective (in situ and remotely sensed) data acquisition and processing methods. b. Studies related to better understanding the longer-term geomorphic impacts and subsequent recovery processes in post-fire environments. c. Studies related to hydrological physical processes, empirical approaches, and numerical modeling. d. Studies related to hydraulics and sediment transport physical processes and numerical modeling.

• S. Nearshore Coastal Research in Support of the U.S. Coastal Research Program (CHL- 19)

  Proposals are invited to address nearshore coastal research needs within three broad research themes as identified by the U.S. Coastal Research Program (USCRP) (see Nearshore Process Community, 2015 for more details). Nearshore systems include the complex interactions of physical, biological, chemical, and human influences within the transition region across the land and the continental shelf, spanning (from onshore to offshore) coastal plains, wetlands, estuaries, coastal cliffs, dunes, beaches, surf zones, and the inner shelf. Worldwide, nearly 1 billion people live at elevations within 10 m of present sea level, an elevation zone in need of engineering solutions that reduce risks to life and property produced by various extreme events. The nearshore is a societally relevant region that requires and improved understanding of the feedbacks and couplings that shape, sustain, and alter coastal landscapes. The three broad research themes include a need to understand, better predict, and respond to (1) Long-term coastal evolution due to natural and anthropogenic processes; (2) Extreme Events including: flooding, erosion, and the subsequent recovery; and (3) The physical biological and chemical processes impacting human and ecosystem health. Each is detailed below a. Long-term coastal evolution due to natural and anthropogenic processes: As storms impact increasingly urbanized coastal communities, an understanding of long-term coastal evolution is critical. Improved knowledge of long-term morphological, ecological, and societal processes and their interactions will result in an improved ability to simulate coastal change and develop proactive solutions for resilient coasts and better guidance for reducing coastal vulnerability. b. Extreme Events including flooding, erosion, and the subsequent recovery: U.S. coastal extreme event related economic losses have increased substantially over the past decades. Addressing this research theme will result in an improved understanding of the physical processes during extreme events, leading to improved models of flooding, erosion, and recovery. Utilization and application of the improved models will produce societal benefit in the form of more resilient coastal communities. c. The physical, biological, and chemical processes impacting human and ecosystem health: Nearshore regions are used for recreation, tourism, human habitation, and provide habitat and valuable ecosystem services. These areas must be sustained for future generations, however overall coastal water quality is declining due to microbial pathogens, fertilizers, pesticides, and heavy metal contamination, threatening ecosystem and human health. To ensure sustainable nearshore regions, predictive real-time water- and sediment-based pollutant modeling capabilities must be developed, which requires expanding our knowledge of the physics, chemistry, and biology of the nearshore. The resulting societal benefits will include better beach safety, healthier ecosystems, and improved mitigation and regulatory policies.

• T. Comprehensive Water Risk Management (CWRM) (CHL- 20)

  Proposals are invited to develop and explore the application of next generation technologies, methods and approaches that lead to the creation of a seamless national hydro-terrestrial capability within the USACE and partner agencies. CWRM includes advanced data collection, prediction and management technologies that can provide water managers the tools required to minimize, mitigate, and better manage water hazards under present and future design requirements. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are needed: a. Inland and Coastal Compound Flooding: Research to support the inclusion of inland and coastal compound flooding in the reduction of comprehensive flood risk from riverine flows, precipitation, coastal storms, groundwater emergence, sea level change, snowmelt, wildfires, subsidence, and other natural as well as anthropogenic events. b. Data Collection: Research to support the collection and analysis of water data through in-situ and standoff measurements including satellite, and various uncrewed systems (UxS). For UxS this includes sensing, perception, control, and data process techniques. Needs include data collection techniques for snowpack analysis, soil-moisture determination, wave environment, estimation of under-water bathymetry, reservoir capacity, etc. c. Probabilistic Modeling – Uncertainty quantification and Data Assimilation: Research to support development of methodology for quantifying numerical uncertainty and forward propagation of that uncertainty into numerical prediction. Additionally, research to develop methods for assimilating observations into probabilistic numerical methods to refine predictions for wave, circulation, and morphologic models. d. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) Technologies: Research to support the use AI/ML technologies to increase the accuracy and efficiency of hydrologic and hydraulic numerical models. Capabilities include advanced data assimilation technologies for error reduction and longer forecasts. e. Flash Flooding: Research to improve the technologies to predict and mitigate water hazards due to flash flooding. Research requirements include downscaling of weather forecasts including precipitation, wind speeds, atmospheric pressure, etc. f. Cold Weather Water Hazards: Research to improve the performance of predictive techniques in cold regions including the arctic. Research requirements include the effects of ice cover on wave and storm mitigation, the effects of the permafrost on hydrologic processes, the effects of flood risk mitigation features on freshwater sources, etc. g. Arid Region Water Hazards: Research to improve the performance of predictive techniques in arid regions. Research requirements include infiltration processes, groundwater and surface water interaction, aquifer recharge, wildfire hydrology, etc. h. Numerical Model Coupling Techniques: Research to improve the performance of numerical model coupling methods. Research requirements include inter and intra-model communication for inter-agency model collaboration.

• U. Innovations in Sediment Management (CHL- 21)

  Proposals are invited to develop leap-ahead innovative and sustainable dredging and sediment management solutions to dramatically reduce costs, increase channel/infrastructure reliability, and add significant economic, environmental, and social value to the Nation. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are requested: a. Coastal/ Hydrodynamic Engineering Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) and Hybrid Solutions: Research to inform the development of tools, techniques and guidance behind designing and engineering nature-based solutions (NBS) and hybrid solutions. This R&D will help in the development of methods and standards which support effective planning, designing, construction, and O&M of NBS/hybrid solutions to support the reduction of coastal and inland flooding risks. This research should focus on exploring the potential for integrating NBS/hybrid solutions within existing hydrodynamic engineering and land use planning practices. b. Innovative Dredging Technologies/ Autonomous Methods: Research to develop technologies and techniques for improved dredging operations. R&D can address evaluating next-generation technologies and dredging operations (e.g., hydrodynamic dredging), real-time dredge position and bottom mapping techniques, autonomous dredging to reduce costs, increase beneficial use of dredged material, sediment transfer and placement equipment to facilitate more beneficial uses (e.g., thin layer placement, strategic placement), reduce channel and reservoir infilling to reduce dredging need, or renewing reservoir capacity through application of technologies developed for navigation channel maintenance. Proposals are invited to develop leap-ahead innovative and sustainable dredging and sediment management solutions to dramatically reduce costs, increase channel/infrastructure reliability, and add significant economic, environmental, and social value to the Nation. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are requested: a. Coastal/ Hydrodynamic Engineering Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) and Hybrid Solutions: Research to inform the development of tools, techniques and guidance behind designing and engineering nature-based solutions (NBS) and hybrid solutions. This R&D will help in the development of methods and standards which support effective planning, designing, construction, and O&M of NBS/hybrid solutions to support the reduction of coastal and inland flooding risks. This research should focus on exploring the potential for integrating NBS/hybrid solutions within existing hydrodynamic engineering and land use planning practices. b. Innovative Dredging Technologies/ Autonomous Methods: Research to develop technologies and techniques for improved dredging operations. R&D can address evaluating next-generation technologies and dredging operations (e.g., hydrodynamic dredging), real-time dredge position and bottom mapping techniques, autonomous dredging to reduce costs, increase beneficial use of dredged material, sediment transfer and placement equipment to facilitate more beneficial uses (e.g., thin layer placement, strategic placement), reduce channel and reservoir infilling to reduce dredging need, or renewing reservoir capacity through application of technologies developed for navigation channel maintenance. c. Hydrodynamic and Geomorphologic Response of Biomaterials: Research into the use of bio-based materials, such as biopolymers, to enhance and increase the resiliency of NBS, including earthen levees, coastal dunes, and dam embankments. This research should focus on the hydrodynamic and geomorphologic response of biomaterials to the impacts of hydrological and meteorological extremes. Considering the performance and sustainability of biobased materials, we seek to understand the potential of bio-based materials to reduce the risk and cost of rehabilitating and maintaining these structures and increase their resiliency against potential threats. We invite research that furthers our understanding and application of bio-based materials for this purpose, as a component of comprehensive water risk management and abilities to adapt to dynamic environmental forcing requirements. The research should be designed to provide evidence and support decision making. It should be based on research available at existing open-source platforms, or data that is proposed to be collected for the research. d. Monitoring of NBS and Beneficial Use of Dredged Sediment Projects: Research to improve the understanding of the performance of NBS and beneficial use of dredged sediment projects through monitoring. Monitoring could include the project’s response to storm events and the post-storm recovery. Monitoring techniques will vary based on the project but may be comprised of satellite data, remote sensing measurements, in-situ measurements, or engaging the public to crowdsource data collection. The monitoring research may also include the development or testing of innovative sensors or monitoring techniques.

• V. Next Generation Water Management (CHL-22)

  Proposals are invited to explore the application of next generation technologies, methods and approaches that are aimed at improving water management practice within the USACE and partner agencies, including efforts that support research, development and implementation of capabilities to support Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO). FIRO is a management approach that seeks to improve water supply, enhance flood risk reduction and achieve additional ecosystem benefits through application of advanced weather and watershed forecast capabilities in water management practice.

  FIRO envisions advanced observation and prediction technology that can provide water managers more lead time to selectively retain or release water from reservoirs based on longer- term forecasts. When storms cause moderate-to-high reservoir levels, normal operation is to release water to re-establish flood control space. FIRO pilot studies have demonstrated that some of that water can be retained for future supply as long as no major precipitation is expected and it can be shown that the retained water can be released past downstream flood prone areas prior to the arrival of the next storm. This strategy permits earlier supply capture in some years, improving supply reliability for downstream water users and improving the timing and volume of releases to protect water quality and provide flows needed for ecosystem benefits. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are needed: a. Improvement of forecast skill to support advanced water management, including meteorological phenomena that are major drivers for floods in various regions across the country including atmospheric rivers, tropical storms/hurricanes, clusters of long-lived thunderstorms and Nor’Easters. This can also include improvements in weather observations and numerical weather forecasting models that result in improved forecasting lead times for water management decision-making.

  b. Improvements in data synthesis, decision support systems and data visualization capabilities to enhance water management decision-making.

  c. Hydrologic and reservoir model development and application, including improvements in watershed monitoring to enhance hydrologic and reservoir models.

  d. Application of FIRO screening process tools to regions of the United States where FIRO has not previously been applied or tested.

  e. Application of FIRO viability assessment processes to systems of dams where multiple dams are operated within a watershed to achieve overall system water management objectives.

  f. Research to support updates to USACE Water Control Manuals (WCMs) using FIRO approaches, scenarios and principles. Updates to WCMs require numerous studies in areas of meteorology, hydrology, hydraulics, ecology and economics. Incorporation of next generation approaches such as FIRO require research efforts to identify best management practices on how to safely and effectively incorporate these new approaches into water management practice as defined in WCMs.

Geotechnical & Structures Laboratory (CHL)

• Overview

  Research performed by the Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory’s (GSL) eight branches consists of investigations in the areas of soil mechanics, engineering geology, geophysics and seismology, earthquake engineering, pavements (both expedient and permanent), mobility and traffic ability of military vehicles, structural design and performance of structures under both static and dynamic loadings, earth dynamics, and the uses and performance of concrete, cement, and other construction materials. Research areas also include measurement and analysis of seismic and acoustic signals to locate airborne and ground military targets and buried objects (including unexploded ordnance) and to characterize earth media. Research on concrete and cement is predominantly related to current recognized needs, both civil and military. Military expediency focuses additional attention on ease and speed of concrete placement, development of very high-strength materials, and use of non-traditional, indigenous, and other special materials in concrete construction. Civil works research focuses primarily on the need to improve the performance of both new and old concrete structures. Structures research involves development, testing, and evaluation of a broad class of structures to resist the effects of static and dynamic loads induced by earthquakes and other sources. The Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory also conducts research involving all aspects for improving the survivability of fixed installations.

• A. Earthquake Engineering (GSL-1)

  Research areas of interest include the dynamic behavior of soil and rock; liquefaction of soils, including coarse-grained and fine-grained soils; in-situ testing to evaluate properties related to dynamic behavior; centrifuge scale-model testing using a multi-waveform shake table; in-situ testing to evaluate susceptibility to liquefaction; methods of analysis of dynamic behavior of earth materials; methods of analysis of dynamic soil- structure interaction; risk-based and probability-based methods of analysis; seismic wave propagation in earth materials; seismically induced settlements in soils and remedial treatment of soils potentially susceptible to earthquake-induced instability or strength loss; computer visualization and dynamic simulation; site response analysis; and strong motion instrumentation.

• B. Geophysics (GSL-2)

  ERDC supports research in the development of land, air, or waterborne geophysical methods to be used for characterization of hazardous waste sites, detection and monitoring of seepage, nondestructive investigation of archeological sites, location of groundwater, and detection of buried objects; analytical and data-processing techniques, borehole surveys, cross hole seismic imaging, electromagnetic detection of anomalies, seismic surveys, sub bottom profiling, and acoustic impedance surveys; and uses of microgravity.

• C. Mobility of Vehicles (GSL-3)

  The Mobility Systems Branch addresses engineering research on the performance of vehicles operating cross country and on-road, and/or in negotiating dry and wet obstacles in worldwide terrains. This is a highly specialized technical area involving engineering mechanics, vehicle dynamics, mathematics, statistics, computer specialties, geology, and soil mechanics. Research in this area includes developing fundamental relations between soil and vehicle running gear; improving criteria concerning the effects of vehicle vibration and ride shock on sensors and data streams from rapidly moving sensors over rough terrain; developing algorithms describing weather effects on terrain, multi-vehicle movements along road nets, stochastic processes describing influence of uncertainties of data elements, and developing modeling and simulation capabilities for near real-time assessments of mobility and counter mobility for battlefield operations and operations other than war.

• D. Pavement Technology (GSL-4)

  Research in this area is conducted in support of the Corps mission to design and construct roads and airfields worldwide and other related engineering functions. This research includes the development of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of permanent and expedient airfields, pavements, and ports. Research areas of interest include improved design procedures, structural performance modeling, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair of structures, expedient surfacing (to include novel, composite, and metallic systems), aircraft and vehicular ground flotation, access/egress systems, gravel surfaced and non-surfaced areas, the use of geotextiles and geomembranes, grid-confining systems, soil stabilization, dust-control materials and techniques, advanced binder systems, remote assessment, earth anchoring, pavement evaluation, and advanced testing, monitoring, and evaluation equipment, software, and methods to support pavement and pavement related functions.

• E. Soil and Rock Mechanics (GSL-5)

  Research is needed to: (a) improve methods for prediction and control of erosion of unlined spillway channels during uncontrolled releases; (b) develop innovative methods for flood protection and flood fighting, including field evaluations of promising technologies; (c) develop guidance for applications of trenchless technology (e.g., micro tunneling, horizontal directional drilling, pipe ramming, pipe jacking, auger boring, etc.) on Corps structures, including measures to ensure safety and stability of Corps structures when trenchless technology is used to install pipelines, cables, or conduits through or beneath levees and other structures;(d) develop improved methods, including risk-based methods for analyzing earth and rock fill dams and other water control structures for both static- and earthquake-induced stresses; (e) improve the state of knowledge of physical and engineering properties of soil, rock, and clay shales; earth-rock mixtures, granular filters, cohesive and non-cohesive fine- grained soils susceptible to liquefaction; and soils susceptible to drastic volume changes (collapse, consolidation, swell); (f) develop rational analytical procedures and more reliable prediction of behavior of partially saturated soils; (g) determine the response of soils in situ to static and dynamic loading and unloading; (h) determine the susceptibility of earth dams to cracking, hydraulic fracturing, and internal erosion; (i) evaluate improved defensive design measures in use of materials, particularly in filter and transition zones and impervious barriers; (j) improve procedures for monitoring and analysis of the performance of new and existing structures, particularly the use and interpretation of observations and data from specialized instrumentation, and expedient systems for rapid inspection and evaluation of the integrity of dams; (k) improve the understanding of the aging processes in dams and the influence of aging (particularly deterioration of safety-related features) on long-term maintenance and/or rehabilitation requirements for dams; (l) develop a better understanding of failure mechanisms to improve design of defensive measures, to provide information for remedial repairs, to assess potential damages resulting from failure, and to provide a basis for emergency actions; (m) develop expedient remedial measures when hazardous conditions are identified and, thus, reduce the damages and catastrophic potential of dam failures; (n) develop methodology to evaluate forces exerted on structural elements by adjacent soil masses that result from long- term variation in soil properties; (o) develop improved methodology for design and construction procedures for shallow and deep foundations, including mats, footings, piers, and piles for buildings, hydraulic structures and waterfront structures; (p) large-scale physical and numerical modeling of deep underground structures (tunnels, shafts, chambers, and intersections); (q) predictions of rock mass dredgability; (r) acoustic emission (micro-seismic) applications in geotechnical engineering; (s) geotechnical aspects of hazardous and low-level radioactive waste disposal; (t) evaluation of rock for use as riprap; (u) grouting of soil and rock masses; (v) sliding stability of gravity structures, and (w) centrifuge modeling of structures founded on or in rock.

• F. Dam Research (GSL-6)

  Research is conducted in support of the Army’s Dams and Transportation Infrastructure Program, specifically the Dam Safety subcomponents. Research covers design, construction, maintenance, repair, and inspection procedures of Army dams as well as other engineering functions as they relate to transportation structures. This involves the formulation of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of dams. Research areas of interest include improved inspection procedures, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair, scour, unknown material properties, unknown foundations, and underwater inspection.

• G. Engineering Geology (GSL-7)

  The GSL conducts a broad range of research in the field of engineering geology in support of federal or other Government technical missions. Specific areas of interest within this field include application of remote sensing to geologic and geomorphic assessments; geo-archeological investigations; applied and numerical geomorphic analysis; computer applications in geotechnical engineering; 3-D visualization systems; uses of geographic information systems; geo hydrology in military and civil applications; including water quality and supply issues; geologic mapping; geologic applications of mathematical techniques and geo statistics; groundwater monitoring, including well installation and design; geologic application of groundwater models; integration of geological and geophysical subsurface exploration techniques; land-loss studies; remedial measures at groundwater contamination sites; seismic hazard characterization and evaluation; subsurface exploration methods (drilling and sampling techniques); test site selection; conceptual and geologic and hydro geologic models.

• H. Excavation, Structural Demolition, and Obstacle Creation (GSL-8)

  Current criteria for improved demolitions call for significantly reduced manning levels and preparation times to accomplish assigned missions. Cost effectiveness, versatility, and safety are also of great importance. Current efforts involve technologies for the standoff creation and reduction of all types of battlefield obstacles, and the excavation of fighting positions. A prime consideration is the development of more efficient means for the application of various types of energetic materials to targets of interest. In addition, modern materials and design principles used in typical target structures must be incorporated into future plans and guidelines for demolitions. Typical missions of interest are road cratering, anti-tank ditching, bridge and tunnel demolition, and the breaching of walls, bunkers, levees, and dams.

• I. Ammunition Storage Safety (GSL-9)

  The military services must store large amounts of munitions, both for war reserves and for training purposes. New conceptual designs for components or systems for storage are needed to reduce the likelihood of an accidental detonation of stored munitions, limit the propagation of air blast and fragments, or mitigate the safety hazards produced by an accidental detonation. In addition, test data and simulation techniques are needed to aid in the definition of the safety hazards from such detonations, and the mechanics of blast propagation among munition stores. Obsolete munitions are often disposed of by deliberate, controlled detonation. Research is needed on new methods for safe, efficient, and environmentally acceptable methods for deactivation of a wide variety of munition types.

• J. Physical Simulation of Munition Phenomenology (GSL-10)

  The mechanical effects induced by munition detonations are physically simulated using a variety of energy sources. Simulations are performed at full- and small (1/2 to 1/10) scale. The mechanical effects from conventional energetic materials are normally performed at small scale. These studies could benefit from improved (better fidelity, less expensive) simulators and simulation techniques. They could also enhance the development of test methodology for micro-scale (1/100 to 1/10) testing including centrifuge testing. Micro-scale test methodology includes the miniature high- fidelity energy sources, miniature sensors, advanced optical techniques, high-fidelity construction techniques for miniature structures, and theoretical developments in the scaling of material behavior.

• K. Geophysical Phenomenology - Multi-Modal Geophysical Phenomenology, Modeling, Data Processing, and Data Management (GSL-11)

  The objectives include detecting, classifying, and locating airborne and ground military targets and buried objects using geophysical methods for homeland defense and homeland security applications. Also included are invasive and non-invasive approaches for measuring and quantifying the geophysical/geologic signatures of diverse geo-environments. This can include the development of new and/or improved analytical and numerical models, rapid data- processing techniques, and new subsurface imaging techniques that include active and passive sensor modalities in a variety of rural and urban terrains.

  Of particular interest is the broadband propagation of energy including, but not limited to seismic/acoustic/infrasonic/electromagnetic/ thermal/chemical, under variable conditions using a variety of sensing platforms (fixed, mobile, airborne, space). The development of new tactics, techniques, and procedures for the employment of novel sensing methods as well as the development and/or verification of empirical testing and evaluation techniques is also desirable. Data management and multi-mode integration techniques and platforms are also of interest.

• L. Laboratory Tests and Constitutive Model Development for Geologic Materials (GSL-12)

  This research requires the formulation of mathematical constitutive models to simulate the mechanical behavior of geological and structural materials and incorporation of models into application-oriented prediction/analysis techniques. Also of interest are the development of dynamic test equipment and techniques and the experimental evaluation of geological and structural material response to high-pressure transient loadings.

• M. Projectile Penetration (GSL-13)

  Theoretical and experimental studies of projectile stresses and trajectories due to impact and penetration into geologic and man-made targets and development of design criteria for shield systems include development of equipment and diagnostic techniques to examine the response of targets to low- and high-velocity impact of penetrators, rods, etc.

• N. Computational Structural Mechanics for DOD Applications (GSL-14)

  The efficient use of scalable computers will require fundamentally new concepts in computational mechanics algorithms. Research includes mathematical formulations and development of scalable computational mechanics algorithms in the areas of structural response, penetration, contact impact, structure-medium interaction, multi-scale, multi-physics, and interdisciplinary flow-thermal-structural interactions. This research area also includes development of computational models for new materials and composite construction (consisting of concrete, composite, and/or geologic materials), as well as the behavior and control of structures composed of such composite construction for military applications.

• O. Concrete Materials (GSL-15)

  Research in this area includes improving the performance of concrete materials and systems. Performance could include very high tensile or compressive strength, high ductility, high fracture toughness, low shrinkage, rapid hardening, very low permeability, resistance to abrasion and erosion durability, chemical resistance, shock-attenuating properties, ultra-low density, thermal insulation properties, workability, and other unique attributes. This includes improvements in the materials typically used in a concrete mixture such as aggregate, cement, supplementary cementitious materials, and chemical admixtures. Aggregates could include waste and/or manmade materials such as fly ash (traditional, blended, or reclaimed), silica fume, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, recycled concrete, lightweight aggregates other potentially low cost and/or green materials. Micro- and Nanoscale aggregates, inclusions, pozzolans, cements and reinforcements such as microspheres, nanosilicates, microfibers and low-cost nanotubes or nanofibers would also be included in this research area. Chemical admixtures such as water reducers, set retarders, set accelerators, air-entraining admixtures, and foaming and defoaming agents that lend unique properties would also be considered in this research area. Since reinforcement is a critical element to the ductility and durability of concrete materials, advanced reinforcement materials that enhance these properties fall under this research area. Additionally, this topic area would include research involving nontraditional cement binders including polymer- impregnated concrete, polymer or resin concrete, polymer Portland-cement concrete and geopolymer concretes.

• P. Concrete Properties and Analysis (GSL-16)

  Research in this area if focused on the development of new nondestructive and destructive test methods and analysis techniques to better characterize the properties and performance of concretes and the constituents that they are composed of at scales ranging from the nano-level to the macro-level. There are a vast number of topics in testing and analysis that could be included in this area as related to the physical and chemical properties of aggregates, cements, pozzolans, admixtures, fibers, and their interaction during the mixing, placing, curing, and service phases of a concrete. This could include but is not limited to: 1. Developing test methods and analysis techniques to better quantify material properties at aggregate-paste and fiber-paste transition zones.

  2. Developing tools, test methods and analysis techniques to non-destructively define the spatial distribution of components in a concrete specimen.

  3. Developing better assessment tools and criteria for predicting durability and longevity of concrete and grout.

  4. Developing better methods to define and classify chemical admixtures by chemical composition and mechanism of performance.

  5. Developing innovative systems to construct concrete materials and structures more economically.

  6. Developing theoretical, computational, and experimental methods for effectively characterizing stress, strain, progressive damage, and fracture of engineering materials subjected to static and dynamic loads.

• Q. Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Concrete (GSL-17)

  Forensic analyses such as assessment of remaining life, maintenance and minor remedial measures, repair and rehabilitation, and surveillance and monitoring are topics of interest. Structures of interest include concrete locks and dams and appurtenant concrete and steel structures (outlet works, retaining walls, gates, piles, bulkheads, tunnels, intakes, etc.), other horizontal and vertical concrete infrastructure, and metals and polymer systems related to those concrete components.

• R. Other Areas of Materials Research (GSL-18)

  Research is needed in the development, properties, and performance of a range of materials for military and civil applications. Needed materials research for concrete applications includes such materials as: curing compounds, coatings, and overlays; polymers or other agents for improving bond between old and new concrete; water stop materials for use in hydraulic structures, and methods for characterizing and testing such materials; grouts for injection underground in very fine fracture systems or porous media; organic and inorganic composites that are used in construction; and grout materials and technologies for waste-disposal and containment such as for both commercial and defense-related low-level and high-level radioactive wastes.

  Other materials research needs include the development, testing, and prototyping of metals, composites, or other novel materials exhibiting advanced mechanical, thermal, rheological, chemical, electrical, and multi-functional properties, and performances. Research is performed on energy absorbing materials for impact, ballistic and blast resistance; hierarchical, multi- layered, and functionally graded material systems; multi-scale reinforcement for macro performance; self-sensing and self-healing materials; and materials demonstrating advancements in durability, high strength-to-weight, fatigue resistance, and ease of application.

• S. Bridge Research (GSL-19)

  Research is conducted in support of the Army’s Dams and Transportation Infrastructure Program, specifically the Bridge Safety and Waterfront Facilities subcomponents. Research covers design, construction, maintenance, repair and inspection procedures of Army bridges and waterfront facilities worldwide as well as other engineering functions as they relate to transportation structures. This involves the formulation of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of permanent and expedient bridge and port facilities. Research areas of interest include improved inspection procedures, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair, scour, unknown material properties, unknown foundations, traffic safety, underwater inspection, fracture critical and fatigue evaluations, load capacity, load testing, and load ratings.

• T. Structures Research (Civil Works) (GSL-20)

  Research is conducted in assessing the performance of critical structures to extreme loads, such as those resulting from seismic, terrorist attack, and storm events, as well as the effects of flow-induced vibrations. Efforts include assessing sensitivity of structural design and analysis procedures, vulnerability of structures, and critical design parameters to develop appropriate load-resistance factors. Techniques for retrofit, including use of new and innovative materials, of structures to resist extreme loads is of interest. Also, a better understanding of long-term behavior and deterioration of civil structures is needed, including factors such as material interactions, thermal stresses, and any issues affecting design of new structures and operation and maintenance of existing structures.

  Nonlinear and linear system identification research includes vibration testing, data acquisition, data processing, and analysis techniques for determining linear and nonlinear dynamic and static response properties of structures and structural systems subjected to earthquakes, blast effects from mining (or other) operations, other transient random, harmonic dynamic loads, and static or pseudo static loads.

• U. Structures Research (Military) (GSL-21)

  1. Research is needed on the response of aboveground and shallow-buried structures subjected to military dynamic loads; specifically, the prediction of the load and response to failure of aboveground and shallow-buried structures. This effort will involve the following research:

  a. Development of techniques to simulate military dynamic loads on aboveground and mounded structures.

  b. Development of design procedures for components in semihardened and protected facilities.

  c. Analysis of structural loading and damage resulting from internal or external detonations.

  d. Development of fast-running models for PC based applications to predict the response of structures, both hardened and unhardened, to single and multiple explosive detonations.

  2. Research on deeply based structures and hardened existing systems involving the following:

  a. Development of comprehensive structural design for deeply buried and surface-buried structures subjected to air blast-induced and direct-induced ground shock from surface and shallow earth-penetrating high-energy sources.

  b. Formulation of computer models for SSI and pre- and post-test analysis of structural response to include correlation and comparison with experimental data.

  3. Research on surveillance and intrusion detection sensors involves the constraints of the environment on sensor systems used to detect intruders and placed along the perimeter of high-value military installations. Improved methods for rapid and accurate measurement of predetermined influential environmental parameters must be developed. Analytical techniques relating to specific sensing phenomenology’s and target/nontarget-generated signatures and signature wave interactions to variations in environmental characteristics are required. Of particular interest is the integration of multiple sensor systems (both detection-type and environmental/background monitoring transducers) that use various sensing phenomena for enhanced target detection and classification and increase nuisance and background signature rejection. Research studies are required in the determination of automated techniques for monitoring sensor system response and sensitivity to provide optimum and consistent performance as a function of time varying changes of influential environmental characteristics.

  4. The Corps of Engineers is involved with research on the design of military facilities for protection from high-energy sources. These efforts include the following research:

  a. Prediction of the response of structural elements common to conventional or expedient construction to military loads.

  b. Methods of retrofitting conventional buildings to harden them against nearby military high-energy sources.

  c. Development of innovative design of structural components, such as windows and doors, subject to high-energy sources.

  d. Development of analytical methods for predicting the effects of forced entry devices on structural components.

  e. Development of innovative designs using low-density materials for expedient protection of troops and equipment from the effects of military high- energy sources.

  f. Development of microprocessor-based software/hardware and supporting documentation to aid in the assessment of structural survivability to the effects of conventional and advanced weapons systems. The software will address the integration of databases, weapons effects calculations, and operational factors associated with engineer survivability missions.

  g. Development of a procedure to ensure robust codes, user-friendly interfaces, and supporting documentation for use in the testing and development of microprocessor-based survivability and structural assessment software/hardware.

  5. Composite Materials for Force Protection-Research in this area includes developing, characterizing, modeling, and testing of layered composite materials for protection against air blast and penetration/fragmentation. These materials are intended for use in lightweight expedient protective systems to protect against improvised explosive devices and conventional weapons such as small arms, standoff weapons, fragmenting weapons, and shape charges. It is envisioned that panels of these materials could be incorporated into protective structure designs to increase survivability of personnel or to protect mission-critical assets. Performance measures include such attributes as build time, low mass, cost, penetration resistance, ductility, and environmental durability. Additionally, this topic area includes methods to develop appropriate material anisotropic and or non-homogeneous material models for incorporation into advanced computational models such as Abaqus, LS-DYNA, and EPIC. Protocols for evaluation and performance testing of composite materials subjected to energetic, high-strain rate events are desired.

  6. Worldwide Construction Practices- This research includes capturing typical construction practices and construction material properties worldwide. Information of interest is material properties of structural components, building types and construction techniques, building footprints, construction timeframe/era of buildings, and location of the building (country, world region, urban terrain zone).

• V. Multispectral Camouflage Research (GSL-22)

  This research area involves all aspects of fixed-facility survivability incorporating signature management and other technical effects. Fixed facilities include stationary and relocatable high-value targets. The general goal is to directly and indirectly increase the survivability of U.S. and Allied facilities and improve the U.S. and allied counterintelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (counter-ISR) capability against adversaries. Multispectral refers to those areas of the electromagnetic spectrum used by the United States and potential adversaries in reconnaissance and surveillance and in attack platform target acquisition and detection. Major objectives include: quantifying or otherwise evaluating counter-ISR technology effectiveness; investigating materials and techniques for signature modification; developing technical effects and physical countermeasures, procedures, and applications; developing computer-based analytical procedures for simulating scenes; developing instrumentation for and conducting target/background signature measurements; assessing the United States and threat operations and sensor capabilities with both currently fielded and new design reconnaissance and surveillance and attack platform sensors and systems; developing applications for intelligence information for military missions; providing guidance to field commanders and information for the RDT&E community; and studies of the interaction of camouflage technology with other operational factors, particularly in determining operational supportability, costs and manpower, interoperability, and joint interoperability requirements.

• W. Advanced Maneuver Technologies (GSL-23)

  This research addresses ground vehicle maneuver in urban environments which poses many new operational and tactical challenges for the Army and Joint Forces. While many improvements have been made in protecting ground vehicles in the last decade, these improvements come with a cost, namely limited situational awareness due to reduced visibility and limited maneuverability in tight spaces because of larger vehicle size. Both of these constraints seriously reduce the mobility of ground vehicles in urban environments. To address these constraints, research is needed to develop technologies to identify nearby dynamic hazards for ground vehicles in urban environments and provide early warning to ground vehicle operators or autonomous driving systems. Specifically, this research will address methods and procedures to develop advanced technologies that will be used for detecting dynamic hazards in urban environments such as traffic flow rates and congestion, pedestrians, buried threats, constricted roads, and other obstacles or anomalous objects in real-time. In addition, further research is needed to develop technologies that will deliver the information in a consolidated or data excerpt manner and report the locations of interest and concern to the driver and or operator. The performance of emerging technologies in sensors and data processing to provide better situational awareness in near real-time to ground vehicle operators maneuvering in dynamic urban terrain is also of interest.

• X. Railroad Technology (GSL-24)

  Research in this area is conducted in support of the Corps mission to design, construct, and operate railroad systems worldwide. This research includes railroad design, construction, inspection, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation. Research areas of interest include advanced and composite materials, rapid repair, non-destructive evaluation, geotextile use in construction, in-situ additive manufacturing of components, soil stabilization, GIS, and remote assessment.

Environmental Sensing

• Overview

  Current research is in the acquisition of information by remote sensor systems, the impact of the environment on imaging and other sensor systems, and advanced signal processing. Sensors using electromagnetic, seismic, and acoustic energy forms are of interest. In addition, work is conducted to determine terrain and other environmental effects on high- technology sensor systems. Sensor systems include optical and infrared millimeter wave (active and passive). Briefly described below are specific research areas.

• A. Sensing (EL-1)

  The EL has an ongoing program to develop and demonstrate advanced technologies that support the Army’s requirements for improved detection and discrimination of unexploded ordnance (UXO), depleted uranium (DU) munitions, radiological threats, and deployment platforms. Additional research work is needed for subsurface (land-based) and underwater (proud and buried) UXO sensing, data analysis, display, and platform navigation/positioning. Special areas of interest include novel sensing concepts for the detection and relocation of buried objects (DU, metallic, and nonmetallic targets) using magnetic, electromagnetic induction, ground penetrating radar, seismic/acoustic, chemical, and/or radiological methods or a combination thereof. Fundamental measurements and models that define/predict the performance of these sensing methodologies in varying environmental conditions for UXO, DU and radiological targets are also of interest. Research is also needed to develop advanced data analysis techniques that can significantly reduce the number of false positives arising from natural anomalies and man-made sources.

• B. Environmental and Military Sensing (EL-2)

  1. Research in this area includes basic and applied research to develop environmental sensing, characterization, and monitoring capabilities necessary to quantify environmental site conditions and trends at local and regional scales. In the military area, research is conducted on basic signature research, to better understand target and environmental background signature characteristics.

  2. Specific areas of required research include:

  a. Development, integration, and application of remote sensing technologies and the use of these data in geospatial models to characterize site conditions over large areas.

  b. Development of innovative data fusion approaches, particularly the combined use of hyper spectral and bathymetric and/or topographic LIDAR data for the extraction of environmental information.

  c. Research to identify, model, and mitigate the effects of the environment on novel sensing techniques that address environmental and military requirements.

  d. Development of ground-based and airborne remote sensing approaches, and associated modeling, for unexploded ordnance detection, minefield detection, military targets and vehicles, and smart weapons development.

  e. Rapid collection, analysis, and visualization of sensor data for environmental quality and military applications.

• C. Environmental, Sensing, Characterization, and Modeling (EL-3)

  There is growing need to utilize and develop artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies for enhanced characterization of forested environments. Novel technologies should leverage remotely sensed and high fidelity in-situ data to improve understanding of complex forest conditions. Numerous benefits for military defense, environmental stewardship, forest resource monitoring and evaluation, and military readiness exist from identifying, quantifying, visualizing, and understanding forest data. Research is needed to capitalize on recent developments in AI-based big data analytics to characterize forests and forest-dwelling species and habitats data to better understand vegetated ecosystems that is traditionally obtained through in situ sampling. Research is needed to capitalize on recent developments in AI based big data analytics to characterize forests and other ecosystems.

  Specific areas of required research include:

  a. Developing novel forest modeling frameworks that utilize remote-sensing and in-situ field data to inform and validate forest characterization—to include vertical stratification.

  b. Quantifying forest characteristics and associated forest-dwelling fauna—to include threatened and endangered species. Provide specialized expertise in the application and deployment of advanced environmental sensors to detect and monitor rare and sensitive species—particularly focused in tropical forested habitats.

  c. Demonstrated experience deploying, managing, and analyzing data from remotely deployed autonomous environmental sensor platforms, including paired acoustic/visual monitoring systems such as Autonomous Recording Units (ARUs), omnidirectional microphones, trail cameras, and related technologies to document rare and sensitive species presence, behavior, and responses to anthropogenic noise disturbances and military training activities.

  d. Tailoring sensor arrays to rapidly detect, evaluate, and quantify both acoustic and visual data in Pacific Island forested ecosystems.

• D. Environmental Instrumentation (EL-4)

  1. Research and development in this area includes basic and applied research and technology demonstrations that support rapid measurement of biological and chemical hazards of the environment.

  2. Specific areas of required research include:

  a. The integration and interoperability of environmental instrumentation with future and existing military robotic systems: this includes unmanned aerial systems, ground robotics, autonomous submersibles, and robotic surface watercraft.

  b. Provide new applications that support faster processing on small low-power hardware to triage environmental measurements to immediately identify biological and chemical hazards.

  c. Techniques that support biomimicry in robotic systems and the differentiation of biotic from abiotic systems. Instruments that are low-power, small, and compact to assess the biological and chemical characteristics of water, soil, and air, in surface and subterranean environments.

  d. Research into sensing of aerosols and/or plumes from either ground or airborne platforms.

  e. Research into novel uses of unmanned aerial systems for environmental characterization and change detection - including fusion of active and passive modalities.

Contaminated Site Characterization, Assessment & Remediation

• Overview

  An extensive research and development program is being conducted by the Department of Defense to assist in the cleanup of contamination at military installations. The EL is developing technologies for characterizing, monitoring, and applying physical, chemical, and biological treatment of toxic and hazardous waste in contaminated surface and ground waters and soils. The EL is also developing, evaluating, and verifying numerical models and guidance for solid waste disposal systems.

• A. Innovative Technology for Environmental Sensors and Tools. (EL-5)

  The EL has an ongoing research program to develop advanced technologies for environmental sensing, characterization, and monitoring in order to quantify environmental conditions at sites of interest. The program is actively developing field-based tools and sensors to conduct rapid site characterization/screening for environmental contaminants. Additional research is needed in the areas of novel sensing technologies for detection of chemical and biological contaminants allowing for rapid field-based data acquisition. Also, research is needed to develop technologies and platforms allowing for rapid data analysis/interpretation/reporting. Fundamental measurements and models that define/predict the performance of new sensing methods in soil, water and air are also of interest.

• B. Innovative Technologies for Treating Contaminated, Sediment, Soil, Surface Water, Ground Water, and Hazardous Waste (EL-6)

  Presently, EL is continuing to conduct research, develop technologies and apply strategies to treat complex organic- and metal-contaminated hazardous liquids, off-gases, soils, sludges, sediments, and residuals from past disposal practices. Research is divided into two major categories: technologies for treating contaminated soils and sediments, and innovative technologies for treating contaminated surface and ground waters. Areas of R&D include: (1) physical and chemical technologies to destroy/detoxify or reduce the quantity and/or toxicity of the contaminated materials, (2) biological processes and methods to detoxify/destroy hazardous waste constituents, (3) techniques for in situ treatment of groundwater aquifers, (4) laboratory design criteria for and field implementation of piloting equipment for promising technologies, (5) computer-based techniques to assess operational performance of various treatment processes/systems and (6) improved analytical chemistry techniques and methodology to assess treatment technologies.

• C. Design, Evaluation, Verification and Modeling of Solid and Hazardous Wastes and Contaminated Sediments (EL-7)

  Efforts are continuing to develop water balance and leachate models for solid waste disposal systems and dredged material disposal facilities. Additional work is needed to model innovative designs, nonsoil surface materials, cobbled surfaces, preferential flow through heterogeneous waste materials and other layers, and effects of complex mixtures of vegetation including trees. Similarly, additional work is needed to verify the existing models.

Sediment Geochemistry and Biological Effects

• Overview

  Potential adverse environmental impacts of disposal of contaminated sediments must be assessed prior to permitting operations. This includes the determination of the impacts that contaminated dredged materials exert on the environment prior to dredging.

• A. Environmental Risk Assessment (EL-8)

  Current research on the fate and effects of environmental contaminants occurs under the general paradigm of Environmental Risk Assessment. Specific studies fall into one or more of the following areas:

  1. Hazard Identification. This is the process of showing causality (i.e., a chemical or complex mixture can cause some adverse effect). If this causality can be demonstrated, the chemical is referred to as a "hazard." If there is no causal link, risk need not be quantified. Important target receptors are also identified by this stage (for example, humans, endangered species, and ecologically or economically important species). Research is conducted to develop the technology for hazard identification and the establishment of causality.

  2. Effects Assessment. While Hazard Identification decides if a chemical or complex mixture is toxic; Effects Assessment establishes the relationship of the toxicant dose and associated biological response. This is accomplished via experimental research in which surrogate species are exposed to gradients (spatial, concentration, etc.) of the hazard in question, and biological effects are monitored. Biologically important endpoints measured include survival, growth, reproduction, and population-level parameters. These endpoints must be accompanied by technically sound interpretive guidance. Results are expressed in dose- response or exposure-response relationships. Research is conducted to develop the necessary experimental/statistical designs, technically sound tests (for example, chronic sub lethal sediment bioassays) and appropriate extrapolations (for example, high dose to low environmentally realistic exposures, and surrogate test species to receptor of interest). Analysis of the uncertainty associated with these effects assessments is also conducted.

  3. Exposure Assessment. In Exposure Assessment, the magnitude, frequency, and duration of contaminant exposure relative to the target receptor(s) are determined. This research is model-intensive, with both descriptive and quantitative models being used to evaluate pathways and routes. A pathway exists if the hazard travels between the initial source of contamination and the ultimate biological receptor. An exposure route is pathway that the chemical contacts the receptor (for example, ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer). Analysis of the uncertainty associated with these exposure assessments is also conducted.

  4. Risk Characterization, Management, Communication, and Analysis. Outputs from the Effects Assessment and Exposure Assessments are joined in Risk Characterization to yield an estimate of risk. Research is conducted to determine the best ways to characterize risk both numerically and descriptively. Also, uncertainty analysis is undertaken to identify the qualitative and quantitative important sources of uncertainty. Techniques employed include error propagation, probability distributions, sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and others. Once environmental risk has been quantified, management action may be required.

  5. Research is conducted to develop management alternatives, which range from no action to extensive (and expensive) remediation. Results of the Environmental Risk Assessment are weighed and balanced with other factors such as applicable laws and regulations, engineering feasibility, potential benefits, costs, economic impacts, and the socio-political decision environment.

  Risk Communication is a dialogue that occurs at two levels: between the risk assessor and the risk manager, and between the risk manager and the public. Research is conducted to identify optimal procedures for communicating environmental risks, including an appreciation for the limits and uncertainties of the numerical results. Risk Analysis is a broad, inclusive term encompassing the processes of Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Risk Communication as well as any field verification or monitoring activities. Field verification is a study or studies carried out to determine the accuracy of laboratory observations and predictions. Field monitoring (in the context of Risk Assessment) is undertaken to ensure that steps taken to manage the chemical risks were successful. Field research studies are carried out for both verification and monitoring purposes.

  6. Engineering With Nature® (EWN®) Research Supporting Innovative Field Sampling Practices, Natural Infrastructure (NI) Construction/Deployment and Related Technologies. Conduct a broad array of EWN research and development that may include, but is not limited to: research pertaining to placement of scientific instruments and/or pursuit of novel experiments that advance field-based sampling and laboratory practices for the purpose of measuring and archiving the performance of natural infrastructure (NI); conduct research and/or test innovative instrumentation that records/monitors natural and engineering processes resulting from the placement of NI and/or hybrid infrastructure; conduct research and test new technologies that result in accelerated construction/placement of natural and nature based features and/or improved placement strategies for dredged sediment used to construct EWN projects.

  7. Technology Transfer Development for Engineering With Nature® (EWN®) Research Areas. Research, develop and analyze technology transfer concepts; analyze target audiences for technical information; test innovative methods of transferring EWN research results and technology to supplement conventional technology transfer. Included may be such items as interactive internet and PC technology applied to training and general information transfer; technology applications of electronic media using the Internet; and innovative public information systems/products. Audiences include Corps of Engineers and the Department of Defense; Congress and other Federal, State, and local agencies; port and transportation authorities; universities; environmentalists and other public interest groups; and the general public.

• B. Sediment Water Interactions (EL-9)

  Sediment/Soil Water Properties. Current research encompasses a wide range of investigations designed to increase understanding of sediment-water interactions. Emphasis is on conduct of investigations for determining the impacts that sediment/soil properties have on sorption and transformation of explosives and release of semi-volatile contaminants to the atmosphere. Factors responsible for sorption and transformation of explosives include redox potential, pH, and the geochemical characteristics of the soil or sediment. Factors affecting the release of semi volatile contaminants from soil or sediment to the atmosphere include relative humidity, wind speed, contaminant concentration, moisture content, porosity, and organic carbon content. Research is also conducted on colloidal system contaminant transport, accelerated sediment oxidation, and the role of solution chemistry in contaminant partitioning between sediment and water.

  Diverse research activities focused on characterizing microorganisms and microbial communities in natural and engineered environments relevant to contaminant transformations, biogeochemical cycling, host-microbiome-contaminant interactions, bio- enabled materials, synthetic biology, and environmental biological threats are currently underway.

  1. Biodegradation of Contaminants. Studies in the biodegradation area emphasize destruction of organic contaminants for remediation purposes. Emphasis is on (1) bioinformatics of microbial community diversity and activities in various ecosystems; (2) delineating biodegradation pathways, enzymes, and genes; (3) determining intermediate and final end- products; (4) assessing the role of environmental and genetic factors regulating the pathways utilized and the rate and extent of destruction of the parent compound; (5) determining the survival and activity of microorganisms added to ecosystems, and biotreatment systems; and (6) enhancing biodegradation to obtain the maximum destruction of organic contaminants within a soil, sediment, or treatment system.

  2. Microbial Sensing. Novel microbial, cellular, molecular and/or genomic approaches are sought and developed for the rapid functional and DNA-based identification, detection, and monitoring of microorganisms in various environmental matrices including soils, sediments, and surface waters. Novel ecological approaches to detect, monitor and predict prokaryotic/eukaryotic microbes are sought that combine physiology, molecular tools, biochemistry, modeling, and remote sensing for the management of high biomass events and environmental toxins.

  3. Biomaterials and Composite Structures. Novel biological materials and/or techniques are sought to manipulate bioprocesses and biomineralization pathways as additives to aggregate and composite products. These products will support advancements in material structural properties that support civil works and military operations.

  4. Insect and plant field collections, insect husbandry, plant maintenance with greenhouse access is sought for various microbiome projects. Needs will be seasonal and very specific to limited insect or plant systems as dictated by internal projects.

  5. Soil, Sediment and Environmental Chemistry. Research interests broadly center on deciphering environmental processes that shape the emergent chemical, physical and biological properties of soils and sediments in natural and built environments. Studies aim to bridge the gap between fundamental science and practical engineering solutions to enhance understanding of environmental processes, improve infrastructure resilience, and promote sustainable practices in soil and sediment management.

  a. Geochemistry of Soils and Sediments. Topics of interest include understanding i) the cycling of nutrients, metal(loid)s, and radionuclides in soils and sediments, ii) the impact of dynamic chemical conditions on soil physical properties, and iii) complex interactions between chemical reactions and dynamic fluid flow (reactive transport). Of particular interest are soil systems impacted by seawater inundation, wildfire, and other natural and anthropogenic disturbances, which alter the productivity, erodibility and trafficability of soils, and soil characteristics that influence military operations and natural disasters. Studies employ the use of novel field measurements, laboratory experiments, and advanced methods of soil analysis, such as synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy, -X-ray diffraction, and X-ray fluorescence microprobe analysis. Molecular to field-scale processes occurring in soils and sediments are modeled using computational tools such as geochemical and reactive transport modeling.

  b. Soils and Sediments in the Built Environment. Research broadly focuses on the function and characteristics of soil and sediment within built environments, including dynamic urban coastal zones. In the built environment, soils and sediments are altered by human activities and/or derived from human-transported materials. Anthropogenic impacts on soil may be intentional (e.g., engineered for a specific purpose) or unintentional (e.g., accidental release of waste). Our research aims to decipher both intentional and unintentional consequences of anthropogenic activities on the health and function of soils and sediments. Focus area includes (1) standardizing approaches to soil health assessment (2) methods to enhance soil functions in nature-based features such as carbon sequestration and water retention, and (3) fate of legacy contaminants such as lead.

• C. Techniques for Contaminated Dredged Material Disposal and Treatment (EL-10)

  1. Development/implementation of innovative technologies to reduce or eliminate contamination present in surface sediment and/or dredged materials. Research to include 1) technologies for cost effective in situ treatment of surface sediments to reduce bioavailability/toxicity; 2) ex situ treatment technologies to reduce contamination and facilitate expanded opportunities for beneficial use of treated material.

  2. Development or enhancement of computer models to be included in the Automated Dredging and Disposal Alternatives Modeling System (ADDAMS) to evaluate the environmental impacts of dredged material disposal. Evaluations include water quality impacts of initial release in open water, effluent discharge, runoff and leachate, benthic impacts, plant and animal uptake, and volatilization.

  3. Development and/or application of new or improved environmental chemistry methodologies to assess contaminant concentrations of dredged material and other complex matrices (e.g., elutriates, bioaccumulation tissues, etc.) focusing on specific compounds or classes, cost effectiveness, quality assurance, lower detection limits, and removal/reduction of challenging matrix interferences.

• D. EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT (EL-11)

  1. Presently, EL is continuing to conduct research, develop technologies and apply strategies to address emerging contaminants (ECs) in the environment. Research falls into for 5 broad categories:

  a. Detection and Measurement:

  b. Development and application of technologies for the detection and measurement of ECs in environmental media at environmentally relevant concentrations.

  c. Application of innovative technologies to discern source of EC contamination.

  d. Screening level methodologies to facilitate near real time detection and measurement of ECs in the field.

  e. Development of forensic methodologies and computational approaches for detection, measurement, prediction of EC precursors and/or degradation products in environmental media.

  2. Exposure Assessment:

  Development and application of technologies for measuring/predicting the movement and fate of ECs in the environment.

  3. Effects Assessment:

  Development and/or application of technologies for establishing the effects of ECs on important ecological and human health receptors/endpoints.

  4. Risk Characterization/Management:

  a. Development and/or application of innovative technologies for characterizing risk of ECs in environmental media. Development and/or application of decision-making tools to support EC related risk management decision-making.

  b. Development and/or application of innovative technologies to remove, concentrate, and/or destroy ECs in environmental media.

  c. Development and/or application of innovative technologies to assist in identification of safer alternatives.

Environmental and Water Quality Modeling

• Overview

  The Corps of Engineers is involved in research and development related to water quality and contaminant fate/transport modeling for surface water, watersheds, and the subsurface, or groundwater. This encompasses a wide range of environmental issues, such as water quality and ecosystem linkages, contaminant transport and fate, eutrophication, effects of land use/management on watershed runoff quality, total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), and ecological and human health risk assessment as related to contaminants in the environment. Research may include model development and field and laboratory investigations to improve model descriptions and to provide required data for model validation.

• A. Numerical Water Quality and Contaminant Modeling (EL-12)

  This area of work is oriented toward development and application of water quality and contaminant fate/transport models for surface water and the subsurface, or groundwater. Surface water modeling includes watersheds and receiving waters, e.g., riverine, reservoir, wetland, estuarine, and coastal water bodies. Groundwater modeling includes modeling both the unsaturated and saturated zones, as well as multi-component flow and transport. Models are utilized for conventional water quality (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, dissolved oxygen, etc.) and contaminants, i.e., toxic substances, such as organic chemicals, trace metals, radionuclides, explosives, and other military unique compounds. Emphasis includes the following: formulation of appropriated physical, chemical, and biological algorithms; improvement of mathematical and numerical methods; collection and assemblage of data for model evaluation; conduct of field and laboratory process investigations designed to develop/improve model descriptions, dynamic linkage of water quality and biological models, including biomass-based, individual-based, and population- based biological models; integration of contaminant exposure models with biological effects data or models to quantify risk; incorporation of uncertainty analysis into modeling; linkage of physical/chemical models with biological population models; linkage of cross- domain models for system wide modeling; development of routines/linkages to include the effects on water quality of watershed landscape features (e.g., buffer zones) and vegetation management; development of a risk assessment modeling system; and development of software to provide graphical user interfaces and modeling environments to enhance model utility and ease of application.

• B. Complex Adaptive Systems (EL-13)

  The central goal of this effort is to identify the rules and feedback processes that govern how interactions between modular components in natural system shape important holistic properties, like the global resiliency to disturbances, and, invariably, the fate of the individual components themselves. These tasks are central to basic research efforts in Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS); an area that impacts a wide range of critical needs in both military and civil works (e.g., immune system responses, decision-making, social feedbacks, and ecosystem management). Current research focuses on ecological systems in which the use of different species and study systems is encouraged to provide diverse and novel solutions to understanding, predicting, or improving the resiliency of complex systems. Recent case studies range from a contaminant’s (e.g., altered water quality, noise, chemical) impacts on individual development and performance, the social roots of information cascades in social vertebrates (spanning from fish and humans), to overall ecosystem functioning based on infrastructure design, overharvesting, or mismanagement. This topic area is inherently interdisciplinary and emphasizes team efforts in the combination of analytical, numerical, and laboratory experiments to test competing hypotheses.

• C. Water Quality and Behavior Modeling (EL-14)

  This research topic focuses on developing early warning indicators to demonstrate how changes in water quality can affect critical ecological processes, thereby raising the subsequent risks imposed on animal populations. We focus on demonstrating when environmental quality is not merely a potential hazard, but how it elicits a functional (e.g., physiological) change during early exposure stages that can impact future performance and, invariably, population survival. Anthropogenic disturbances would include sediment plumes, temperature spikes, or contaminants. Animals typically display stable and, generally, predictable physiological and behavioral patterns in non-stressful conditions.

  However, sub- lethal (including chronic) or acute environmental changes can drastically alter behavior and activity, remain undetected, and invariably introduce unacceptable levels of error in model predictions. Current methodologies range from simple bioassays to more complex physiological consequences at the individual level, to long-term costs/benefits at higher ecological levels (i.e., habitat use, populations, and communities). Hypothesis testing based on a combination of laboratory and modeling is encouraged, along with field data when possible. Findings from these efforts play an important role in both civil works and military activities.

Environmental Impact Prediction, Assessment and Management

• Overview

  This research program addresses environmental impact prediction, assessment, and remediation and is intended to provide Corps, Army, and other field operating elements with techniques and methodologies for environmental assessments and EIS preparation, guidance on selecting appropriate planning, design, construction, and operation alternatives, and implementation of the planning function pursuant to NEPA and other legislation and guidance. Specific objectives include:

  A. Developing, verifying, and demonstrating practical prediction and assessment techniques including applying and refining habitat-based evaluation methods, evaluating mitigation measures, developing streamlined frameworks for environmental monitoring, applying ecosystem simulation principles to environmental analysis, and estimating future habitat quality.

  B. Documenting and quantifying environmental effects associated with various types of Corps, Army, and other activities. Research has included the effects of aquatic habitat modification on anadromous fishes, the effects of selective clearing and snagging on in stream habitat, and t h e benefits of channel modification for aquatic habitat in reservoir tail waters and local flood control channels.

  C. Developing and demonstrating design, construction, and management alternatives that will minimize adverse effects and protect natural and cultural resources. Research has included techniques for managing wildlife habitats, preserving archeological sites, and stabilizing eroding shorelines.

  D. Developing, validating, and demonstrating novel systems biology-, computational biology- or bioinformatics-based approaches to understanding and quantifying toxicological impacts of environmental contaminants in environmentally relevant organisms.

• A. Biotechnical Shore Stabilization (EL-15)

  Biotechnical (sometimes called bioengineering) shore stabilization is the use of a combination of live vegetation and structural materials (for example, breakwaters, geotextiles, erosion control fabrics/mats, building materials) for erosion control of shores. Shores of particular interest are those of streams, lakes, or dredged material deposits and subject to erosion from waves, surface runoff, and wind. Research is needed to determine the causes and amounts of erosion and to identify and assess cost-effective biotechnical erosion control methods. Studies may include, but are not limited to, identifying, developing, and cultivating appropriate flood- tolerant plants and varieties or cultivars and cost-effective installation procedures of biotechnical techniques.

• B. Freshwater Fishery Investigations (EL-16)

  Primary areas of research are predicting environmental impacts of navigation and flood control projects on fishes, freshwater mussels, and other aquatic fauna; benefits of restoring aquatic habitat including environmental flows; conservation of endangered fish and mussel species; evaluating freshwater and coastal wetland fish communities; management of invasive species movement and colonization including Asian Carp; and fishery management in vegetated waterbodies. New and innovative approaches to determine physiological, behavioral, population and community level responses of fishes to habitat variables are of interest, along with technological advancements in sampling and multivariate data analysis capabilities. Demographic and landscape habitat models are anticipated products of this research.

• C. Freshwater Macro invertebrate Investigations (EL-17)

  Research focuses on assessment of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate communities, with emphasis on insects and mussels. Studies include stream and river biotic assessments, terrestrial and aquatic insect surveys, assessment of threatened and endangered invertebrate populations, feeding ecology of fishes, and evaluation of stream and river food webs and energetics. Assessments of environmental effects of USACE activities, including stream and river impoundments and structural changes, are also performed using naturally occurring macroinvertebrate and mussel communities as indicators of current and past ecological shifts. Restoration and management recommendations are also made through the analysis of these invertebrate communities in both freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Technical and analytical advancements, including sampling and data analysis are of interest.

• D. Mitigation (EL-18)

  An avoidance, minimization, and/or compensation process is required for impacts from water resources projects on ecological resources (fish, wildlife, habitat, or installation activities). Planning and implementing mitigation are a complex process, and new ideas that contribute to success of mitigation are invited. Subjects such as Best Management Practices for avoiding or minimizing impacts, planning for mitigation based on impact analysis, incremental analysis to justify mitigation, mitigation banking, future predictions, and mitigation for indirect or cumulative impacts are included.

• E. In Stream Flow Requirements for Aquatic Biota (EL-19)

  Research focuses on development and application of fish habitat assessment methods. Currently, the most widely used system, the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM), is used to assess the effects of reservoir operations on downstream fish habitat. Research is needed to better quantify the relationships for fish preference and flow conditions, as well as habitat requirements for aquatic invertebrates. When appropriate, laboratory-based studies can support field-based modelling efforts. Verification studies of these models will be required as development continues. Assessment methods must be able to evaluate the impacts of a variety of reservoir operations such as base load or peaking hydropower releases and at multiple scales from single project to basin – wide studies.

• F. Behavioral and Structural Fish Barriers (EL-20)

  Entrainment of fish at Corps hydropower projects may result in passage of fish through turbines with attendant death or injury from impact with runner blades, pressure changes, or shear forces. Evaluations of a number of behaviorally based technologies and structural barrier designs conducted under laboratory and field conditions have yielded results that are generally inconsistent. Consequently, there currently exist no consistent guidelines for selection of appropriate technology for site-specific applications at Corps dams. Research is required to relate effectiveness of different technologies to size and species of fish, dam design, operations, season, and other site-specific conditions. The information produced by this research will be used to develop specifications and guidelines for fish protection technologies at Corps dams to reduce entrainment and mortality. This effort may involve literature synthesis, laboratory research, design and fabrication of prototype systems, or field studies as well as simulation analysis of fish movement/passage patterns.

• G. Fish Guidance and Bypass Systems (EL-21)

  CE water resource activities may result in blockage of historical fish migration routes through waterways. These blockages, with associated fragmentation of habitats, may have severe impacts on anadromous and catadromous fish populations. A variety of bypass system technologies are available to guide fish around dams. However, many of these systems operate at reduced efficiencies because they damage fish, fish are unable to locate entrances to the systems, or because fish become disoriented and "fall back" after an initial successful passage. Research is required to better understand the hydraulic and behavioral characteristics of fish bypass systems, including the use of behavioral technologies to guide fishes towards these systems and to successfully orient them within the system.

• H. Coastal Ecology (EL-22)

  Research topics in coastal ecology include multidisciplinary investigations of the environmental impacts of engineering activities in the coastal zone, such as dredging, dredged material disposal, and construction of coastal structures (e.g., jetties, breakwaters, groins, seawalls, marinas). Emphasis is placed on improved technologies for assessment, protection, and management of fish and shellfish resources and their habitats. Of particular relevance are proposals dealing with endangered species (e.g., sea turtles, marine mammals), beneficial uses of dredged material and habitat restoration in the coastal zone (e.g., marsh, oyster reef or mudflat creation), and application of population dynamics and ecological models for impact prediction and assessment at population/community/ecosystem/watershed levels. Other areas of interest include effects of beach nourishment and use of offshore borrows areas, seasonal restrictions on dredging and disposal operations, artificial reef technologies, and cumulative impact determination and mitigation techniques.

  Other focus areas include:

  a. Effects of beach nourishment on benthic communities and surf-zone (near- shore) fishes,

  b. Active and passive fisheries acoustics to assess fish migratory patterns, spawning habitat, fish density and spatial distribution patterns near dredging operations and placement sites.

  c. Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) protection from increases in turbidities and suspended sediments.

  d. Fish entrainment

  e. Behavioral changes to marine organisms (e.g., migratory blockage of migratory fishes due to the presence of the dredge, particularly in narrow or constricted waterways).

  f. Underwater noise impacts to aquatic species due to dredging and disposal operations.

  g. Ecosystem restoration (e.g., filling offshore/near-shore borrow areas to natural bathymetry).

  h. Artificial reef creation using dredged rock and other suitable material to enhance fisheries and shell fisheries resources.

  i. Thin-layer placement, re-contouring natural bathymetries. Increased costs associated due to compliance with environmental windows/seasonal restrictions imposed on dredging and disposal operations, and cumulative impact determination and mitigation techniques.

• I. Techniques for Designing, Operating and Managing Dredged Material Disposal Facilities and Beneficial Use Projects (EL-23)

  1. Refinement and verification of techniques for designing, operating, and managing dredged material disposal areas.

  2. Development of a computerized economic database for costs associated with dredging sediments; disposing of dredged material; and constructing, rehabilitating, and operating and managing dredged material disposal areas.

  3. Development and refinement of computer models for dredged material management and beneficial use to be included in the ADDAMS.

• J. Systems Biology, Computational Biology, and Bioinformatics for Environmental Impact Assessment (EL-24)

  A wide spectrum of research in systems toxicology, biological networks, synthetic biology, predictive toxicology, genomics, bioinformatic data mining of next-generation sequencing data, adverse outcome pathway development, toxicological modes of action discovery, herbicide resistance mechanisms, structural biology, chemoinformatics, and molecular modeling is currently underway. Proposed research in mechanistic/predictive toxicology, structural biology, bioinformatics, or computational biology would complement current research areas.

  1. Novel genomics, epigenetics and synthetic biology approaches are sought and developed to assess biochemical, physiological, or other toxicological (adverse) effects on the biota at molecular, cellular, tissue/organ, individual, population, community, or ecosystems levels.

  2. Novel in silico modeling and data mining approaches that are based on computational biology, biophysical or bioinformatics principles and techniques are sought and developed to systematically analyze and interpret big data generated using cutting-edge and high- dimensional biotechnologies such as next-generation DNA sequencing, hybridization-based microarray, proteomics, and metabolomics technologies. Novel mathematical approaches and analysis methodologies are also sought to interpret or describe data generated using novel experimental protocols, and which may account for internal forces, energy and information flows that regulate biological, biophysical, or bioenvironmental processes.

  3. Tools for assessing environmental impacts of synthetic biology. This work involves identifying synthetic biology technologies and understand their current state of use, development, technology readiness, as well as their potential environmental impact. This includes hazard identification, effects assessment, fate, transport, and transferability of various technologies. Moreover, the work entails quantifying environmental impacts of synthetic biological technologies through experimental and modeling approaches. This includes establishing screening mechanisms for genetic and physiological traits for synthetically derived systems, microcosm experiments with tractable organisms to assess potential for spread/transfer of synthetic constructs.

Environmental Criteria for Stream Channel Alteration Projects

• Overview

  The Corps of Engineers is involved in the alteration of stream channels for flood damage reduction, navigation, channel stabilization, and ecosystem restoration, as well as alterations performed by others as part of the Clean Water Act. Modifications to channels include removal of snags and vegetation, channel alignment (straightening), channel enlargement, construction of levees, stream bank protection, and grade control. The Corps is also involved in regulating and furnishing technical assistance to States in regard to other types of channel alterations such as gravel mining. Work at the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center’s Environmental Laboratory (EL) and elsewhere has generated environmental design criteria for stream channel alterations to improve the net effect of these projects. Examples of environmental design features include low-flow channels, combinations of structure and vegetation, management of cutoff bend ways and other backwater areas, and recreational trails.

• A. Riparian and In Stream Habitat Restoration (EL-25)

  Current research includes formulating guidelines for stream restoration and environmental enhancement of flood control and aquatic ecosystem restoration projects. Among the general issues addressed are, in-stream and riparian habitat assessment; benefits of habitat improvement, structures, and techniques; impacts of vegetation on flow conveyance and/or sustainability, channel stability, and sediment transport; construction practices; and monitoring and maintenance. Proposals are invited in these general areas and related efforts. In addition, specific needs include the following: (1) Techniques to quantify habitat and other environmental benefits of restoration efforts, as well as quantification of adverse impacts to the aquatic environment, (2) Algorithms that account for momentum losses at vegetated floodplain/channel interfaces, (3) Data supporting evaluations of the hydraulic impacts of in-stream structures, (4) Development and refinement of related computerized databases and models, and (5) Calculating impacts to and identifying vulnerabilities of riparian systems.

• B. Assessing Benefits of Channel Modifications (EL-26)

  Dams and local flood control structures may degrade aquatic habitat conditions in tail waters and streams. In some cases, habitat degradation can be eliminated, stabilized, or reversed through channel modification for aquatic habitat (i.e., construction of low-cost, low head weirs to create pools) with minimal changes in dam operation or flood channel design. However, there are no widely accepted methods available to incrementally relate in stream aquatic habitat value, channel modifications, and in stream flows to allow trade-off analyses among cost, design, and habitat benefits. It is desirable to modify existing in stream flow methods or develop new methods that will allow incremental assessment of habitat values, alternative flows, and different channel designs. This work may involve data collection, analysis, interpretation, and software development.

More topics in progress (see solicitation for all topics).

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, ERDC awards provide meaningful strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Technical Credibility:
Selection by ERDC signals strong alignment with U.S. Army and national infrastructure priorities, which can materially strengthen your credibility with customers, primes, and investors.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation:
Companies can advance core technology without equity dilution, preserving ownership while increasing enterprise value.

Long-Term Government Relationship Building:
ERDC BAAs are often a gateway into follow-on DoD contracts, reimbursable work, and sole-source opportunities.

Increased Visibility Across DoD and Civil Works:
Successful projects frequently expand beyond a single lab, creating exposure across USACE, DoD, and federal infrastructure stakeholders.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

This BAA is continuously open until January 1, 2027, and all submissions initially enter the process as pre-proposals. Pre-proposals may be submitted at any time through the ERDCWERX portal and are limited to five pages, plus a one-page executive summary.

ERDC conducts a preliminary technical review of pre-proposals as they are received. Offerors can expect a response within 60 days of submission, either encouraging submission of a full proposal or advising that the pre-proposal was not favorably reviewed.

If a pre-proposal receives a favorable review, ERDC will issue a formal invitation from the Contracting Office to submit a full proposal. Full proposals then undergo scientific peer review, cost evaluation, and funding availability assessment.

There is no fixed award cycle or batch deadline. Awards may be made at any time following successful evaluation and are subject to availability of funds.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) through its Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) and supported DoD research programs.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is unrestricted, meaning any qualified U.S. or international entity may apply, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. This includes:

• For-profit companies

• Startups and small businesses

• Universities and nonprofit research organizations

What companies and projects are likely to win?

ERDC evaluates proposals based on:

• Clear alignment with ERDC mission and stated research areas

• Strong scientific or technical merit

• Demonstrated capability of the proposing team

• Practical relevance to military or civil works challenges

• Realistic scope and cost relative to expected outcomes

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• ERDC may limit awards based on funding availability in specific technical areas

• Some projects may be subject to export control, security, or publication restrictions

• Proposals must clearly identify whether research is considered “fundamental”

• Full proposals must be submitted only through designated laboratory channels, not directly to technical staff

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive pre-proposal under this BAA will likely take 20–40 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 for the Pre-Proposal Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Michael J Fox - Parkinson’s Disease Therapeutics Pipeline Program (TPP)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full RFA before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Parkinson’s Disease Therapeutics Pipeline Program (TPP) is The Michael J. Fox Foundation’s (MJFF) flagship therapeutic development funding program designed to accelerate promising Parkinson’s disease (PD) therapies from preclinical development through early clinical proof-of-concept. The program supports both disease-modifying and symptomatic interventions and can also fund biomarker activities that directly inform therapeutic development decisions. Funding is intended to de-risk programs, generate evidence that advances key development milestones, and attract follow-on investment.

Applications begin with a rolling pre-proposal process. For the current review cycle, the application deadline is January 8, 2027 for applicants submitting pre-proposals during the period September 19 – November 27.

Companies developing differentiated Parkinson’s therapeutics with a clear path to a meaningful development milestone over the next 2–3 years should strongly consider this opportunity.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding ranges from $1M to $5M depending on development stage and project scope.

Development Stage Maximum Budget Maximum Duration

Early preclinical discovery $1M 2 years

Development candidate selection $3M 2 years

IND-enabling studies $5M 2 years

Early clinical development $5M 3 years

Final funding decisions may differ from these amounts following reviewer feedback and discussions with MJFF staff.

What could I use the funding for?

MJFF prioritizes pre-clinical and clinical programs that may slow, stop, or prevent disease progression, efforts that address moderate-to-advanced motor or non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s not well-managed by current treatments such as advanced gait disturbances (e.g., balance issues linked to falls, freezing) and cognitive changes. Activities within scope of this program include:

• Pre-Clinical: Identifying, validating and/or developing novel pharmacological and non- pharmacological interventions through pre-clinical development from early screening topre-clinical characterization and testing.

• Clinical: Progressing promising interventions with strong preclinical packages into/through initial clinical assessment exploring pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, safety/tolerability, or early proof of biology and/or clinical efficacy.For novel targets, MJFF is particularly interested in de-risking programs by supporting early proof of concept in patients to gain insight into the therapeutic potential, including exploration of biomarker-based or clinical endpoint-based efficacy.

Any intervention may be considered based on clear patient need, rationale and strong mechanism-of-action understanding. Interventions may be pharmacological (small molecules), biological (biologic, gene therapy) or non-pharmacological including surgical approaches, technology-enabled therapeutics and neuromodulation approaches. Competitive non- pharmacologic proposals will have compelling, existing data from human studies with strong potential for clinical adoption. Applicants may also propose testing of repurposed or repositioned therapies but should propose clear and robust biomarker-enabled testing strategies.

Funding supports therapeutic development activities for Parkinson’s disease across multiple stages of development. Eligible activities include:

• Disease-modifying therapies intended to slow, stop, or prevent PD progression.

• Symptomatic therapies intended to improve quality of life and daily functioning.

• Small molecules, biologics, gene therapies, surgical approaches, neuromodulation approaches, and other technology-enabled therapeutics.

• Repurposed therapies with robust biomarker-enabled and/or clinically meaningful outcome strategies.

• Preclinical activities including hit identification, lead optimization, mechanistic studies, and clinical trial-enabling work.

• Clinical-stage activities evaluating safety, biological activity, and early efficacy signals in people with PD.

• Biomarker activities that support translational readiness, dose selection, patient stratification, mechanism confirmation, and other development decisions.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, MJFF awards offer meaningful strategic advantages:

• Strong Scientific and Patient-Centered Validation: Selection by MJFF signals rigorous scientific merit and strong alignment with patient-driven therapeutic priorities in Parkinson’s disease.

• De-Risking for Follow-On Capital: MJFF explicitly positions this program to de-risk therapeutic programs and catalyze follow-on investment from venture capital, strategic partners, and other funders.

• Access to MJFF’s Ecosystem: Awardees gain access to MJFF’s extensive network of clinicians, researchers, industry partners, patient advisors, and proprietary research tools, datasets, and biosample repositories.

• Enhanced Exit and Commercialization Potential: Government- and foundation-validated programs often command higher valuations during licensing, acquisition, or later-stage financing due to reduced technical and clinical risk.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Pre-proposals may be submitted at any time and are typically reviewed within three weeks. If invited, full proposals are submitted during one of five annual review cycles. Funding decisions are communicated within three months of full proposal submission.

Upcoming full proposal deadlines include:

• June 25, 2026 → Funding decision September 2026

• August 20, 2026 → Funding decision November 2026

• October 30, 2026 → Funding decision January 2027

• January 8, 2027 → Funding decision March 2027

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided directly by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, a nonprofit organization dedicated to accelerating cures and better treatments for Parkinson’s disease through aggressively funded translational research.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is limited to:

• Industry applicants (biotechnology, pharmaceutical, medical device, or other for-profit companies), or

• Academic teams partnered with an industry collaborator capable of commercial development.

Both U.S. and non-U.S. entities are eligible. The for-profit entity is expected to serve as the primary grantee and commercialization lead.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Successful applications typically demonstrate:

• A strong biological rationale for the therapeutic target, supported by genetic or in vitro/in vivo validation data.

• A clearly differentiated therapeutic approach believed to be superior to existing or pipeline therapies.

• Robust translational biomarker strategies to measure target engagement and mechanism of action.

• Clear preclinical-to-clinical translation potential with a realistic commercialization pathway.

• For clinical programs, a patient-centered development plan incorporating patient input.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

MJFF will not fund:

• Large-scale target discovery efforts (e.g., genomic or transcriptomic screening).

• Target validation using only tool compounds with no path to drug development.

• Reformulation of commercially available drugs via new routes of administration.

• Studies evaluating dietary supplements.

MJFF does not intend to serve as the sole funder and expects applicants to pursue complementary funding sources.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive pre-proposal for this opportunity will likely take 20–40 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

Additional Resources

See Request for Applications Here.

Defense Sciences Office (DSO) Office-wide BAA – DARPA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Defense Sciences Office (DSO) is soliciting proposals under its Office-wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) to fund revolutionary basic or applied research that enables breakthrough advances in science, devices, or systems for national security applications. Proposals are accepted on a rolling basis through June 2, 2026, and may be submitted as executive summaries, abstracts, or full proposals. This BAA is designed to capture novel, high-risk, high-reward ideas not already addressed by existing DARPA programs.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA anticipates making multiple awards, but no fixed award size or funding range is specified in the BAA. Award amounts, duration, and structure are determined based on the proposed technical scope, cost realism, and selected award instrument. An accelerated award option is available for select proposals not exceeding $2,000,000, with awards made within approximately 30 days of selection.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding may be used to pursue innovative basic or applied research concepts that enable revolutionary (not evolutionary) advances aligned with DARPA’s mission. Proposals may address, but are not limited to, the following DSO technical thrust areas:

• Materials, Manufacturing, and Structures - Breaking the tension between performance and efficiency for critical parts, production processes, energetics, superconductors, and propulsion

• Sensing, Measuring, and Affecting - Developing and leveraging new science to overcome existing barriers limiting the performance and/or practicality of sensing, measurement, and control, to achieve orders of-magnitude improvement in operational capabilities.

• Math, Computation, and Processing - Enabling quantum, reimagining classical, and developing entirely new forms of computing for enhanced efficiency and new capabilities. Solutions may range from new approaches to hardware (implementation) to representation and computation.

• Complex, Dynamic, and Intelligent Systems - Creating new scientific capabilities for classes of systems that evolve and adapt and for which traditional reductionist, data-driven, and statistical methods fail. Systems of interest include, but are not limited to, foundations of intelligence, human-AI ecosystems, homeostatic mechanisms, and global systems.

Proposals focused primarily on incremental improvements or manufacturing scale-up are explicitly excluded.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, selection under a DARPA DSO BAA provides substantial indirect value:

• DARPA Validation and Credibility: Being selected signals strong technical merit and alignment with DARPA’s mission to create or prevent technological surprise.

• Increased Visibility: Awardees gain visibility within the national security R&D ecosystem and among DARPA program managers.

• Access to DARPA Engagement Pathways: Participation can lead to future invitations to targeted DARPA programs, Disruption Opportunities (DOs), or Advanced Research Concepts (ARCs).

• Nondilutive De-Risking: Advancing frontier technology with nondilutive capital can materially improve company valuation and future exit outcomes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

1. Review Process: Rolling through June 2, 2026

2. Accelerated Award Option: Awards made within ~30 days of selection for qualifying proposals

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) within the U.S. Department of Defense, through the Defense Sciences Office (DSO).

Who is eligible to apply?

1. U.S. and non-U.S. organizations may apply

2. Small businesses, startups, universities, and large firms are eligible

3. FFRDCs, UARCs, and Government Entities (including National Labs) are not eligible

4. Non-U.S. participants must comply with export control, security, and nondisclosure requirements

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA evaluates proposals based on the following criteria:

• Scientific and technical merit of a novel, feasible, and well-reasoned approach

• Relevance and contribution to DARPA’s mission and national security impact

• Clear articulation of technical risk and credible mitigation strategies

• Strong alignment between scope, cost, and schedule realism

• Ability to enable revolutionary—not incremental—advances

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Incremental or evolutionary improvements are not of interest

• Manufacturing scale-up is explicitly excluded

• Some projects may involve Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and require compliance with NIST SP 800-171

• Projects involving human subjects or animal research must follow DARPA approval procedures

• DARPA retains discretion to determine whether work is fundamental or non-fundamental research

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Generative Optogenetics - DARPA BTO

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office is awarding $1.7M–$1.99M Phase 1 awards to teams developing optically controlled, template-free DNA or RNA synthesis in living cells under the Generative Optogenetics (GO) program. The program uses a staged process beginning with 5-page abstracts due January 16, 2026, followed by invitation-only oral proposals.

How much funding would I receive?

If selected, you would receive a fixed-price Phase 1 award of $1.7M for Research Objective 1 (RO1) or $1.99M if addressing both RO1 and the optional Research Objective 2 (RO2). DARPA anticipates multiple Phase 2 awards for teams that successfully pass the Phase 1 Concept Design Review at month 9.

What could I use the funding for?

The DARPA GO program aims to develop a protein complex, referred to here as a nucleic acid compiler (NAC), that can be expressed within living cells to allow an end user to program genetic instructions into those cells, template-free, using nothing but light to transfer the genetic information to the cells (Figure 1). The central challenge of developing the NAC involves integrating protein domains / subunits for precise optical responsiveness (i.e., optogenetic domains), substrate binding, and enzymatic activity into a functional complex of proteins (i.e., a holoenzyme). While many of these domains have precedence as either engineered or naturally occurring proteins, the challenge lies in developing the interoperability and seamless integration of these domains into a functional holoenzyme, the NAC. Advances in computational design, which allow for accurate prediction of protein structures and binding interactions, are essential for optimizing substrate binding sites, allosteric interactions, and domain integration. These computational tools are crucial for designing the NAC to respond rapidly and predictably to optical signals, enabling the synthesis of long, accurate nucleic acid sequences that can precisely alter cellular function as intended. Moreover, expression of the NAC itself must not be deleterious to host cell function or viability.

To develop the NAC, the GO program consists of two Research Objectives (ROs):

• Research Objective 1 (RO1): De Novo Synthesis

  All GO performers MUST address RO1, which focuses on developing the core capability of the NAC for template-free DNA or RNA synthesis, where optical inputs precisely dictate the sequence of the nucleic acid produced by the NAC in a living cell. A NAC can be designed using a variety of architectures, ranging from extremes of a single, monolithic protein comprised of multiple domains to multi-unit complex (Figure 2). To accomplish this, performers will need to solve three critical challenges: achieving multiplexed optogenetic control, ensuring stability and the precise polymerization of the NAC-nucleic acid sequences, and successfully integrating the molecular components into the NAC.

  1.3.2.1. Multiplexed Optogenetics

  Achieving distinct multiplexed optical programming of the NAC presents a significant challenge, as it requires precise engineering of multiple protein domains capable of responding to distinct wavelengths of light. Currently optogenetic systems have been demonstrated to support up to three distinguishable wavelengths (red, green, and blue) within a cell, but expanding this capability is essential for enabling the NAC to incorporate nucleotides with high precision. This expansion may involve optimizing existing optogenetic domains or developing new ones with improved photophysical properties, such as enhanced spectral separation, faster on/off kinetics, and reduced phototoxicity. By leveraging photons as massless information carriers, these optogenetic domains must facilitate precise molecular motion and interaction, ensuring accurate nucleotide incorporation and enzymatic activity. Computational protein design tools and directed evolution approaches offer potential strategies to overcome these limitations, enabling the multiplexed optical control required for the NAC to function effectively.

  1.3.2.2. Stable and Precise Polymerization

  The NAC must achieve precise polymerization, including initiating synthesis, maintaining processivity to stabilize elongating nucleic acid sequences, and efficiently releasing the synthesized strand to meet program metrics for length and accuracy. The NAC design may need to include strategies to address the challenge of selectively binding the correct nucleotide substrate at the correct time from the mixture of these substrates that exists within the cellular environment. Overcoming this challenge will be necessary for the NAC to achieve desired sequence accuracy metrics for the GO program. Additionally, the stability of the complex formed between the NAC and the nucleic acid sequence it is synthesizing must be sufficient to avoid unwanted dissociations that will result in truncated sequences. Similarly, NACs that synthesize single-stranded nucleic acids will need to overcome issues associated with secondary structures (e.g., hairpin loops) in the DNA/RNA molecule that could interfere with continued synthesis. Achieving stable NAC-based nucleic acid synthesis may necessitate designs that incorporate accessory subunits/domains to improve processivity by holding on to the newly synthesized strand and/or single-stranded binding proteins/domains that hinder the formation of problematic secondary structure in DNA/RNA molecules. Finally, the performers will need to resolve the challenge of releasing synthesized sequences, which may involve strategies such as natural termination signals or engineering inducible cleavage mechanisms.

  1.3.2.3. Integration of Molecular Components

  A fully functional NAC must integrate optogenetic, substrate binding, catalytic, and other domains into a cohesive holoenzyme capable of precise and predictable operation. This integration presents significant challenges, as the domains must interact seamlessly to ensure accurate nucleotide incorporation and overall system functionality. For example, optogenetic domains may need to regulate substrate binding to ensure that nucleotide incorporation into the DNA or RNA sequence aligns precisely with the optical illumination pattern. Similarly, designs involving protein subunit binding must coordinate these interactions with substrate binding domains to maintain synchronization and fidelity. Addressing these challenges may involve strategies such as identifying domains that interact effectively to control the NAC, ensuring synchronous activation and deactivation of multiple NACs within a living cell, and optimizing domain interfaces for efficient communication. Potential approaches include leveraging computational tools to map allosteric pathways, modeling molecular motion to predict domain interactions, and employing high-throughput empirical methods to refine and validate integration strategies.

• Research Objective 2 (RO2): Error Mitigation

  OPTIONAL, GO performers may elect to address RO2 in addition to RO1. Note that GO performers shall not pursue RO2 without addressing RO1. RO2 addresses the challenge of achieving high-fidelity synthesis in NACs by incorporating mechanisms to detect and filter out sequence errors. Some applications of GO technology will necessitate NACs capable of synthesizing longer sequences, and it is anticipated that increasing the length of the sequence will increase the likelihood it contains errors. To this end, RO2 aims to investigate the tradeoffs involved in designing a NAC with enhanced error detection capabilities to meet stricter error tolerance requirements, including how these design choices impact overall NAC performance. There are several potential approaches to address RO2 (Figure 3), an example includes developing doublestranded synthesis methods that incorporate components such as mismatch-binding proteins (e.g., MutS homologs). These proteins can either flag errors for downstream correction or be engineered to degrade faulty sequences, ensuring that only high-fidelity nucleic acid strands are retained. Other strategies may include utilizing base editors to identify nucleotide incorporation errors or synthesizing palindromic sequences that fold onto themselves to increase error detection. RO2 provides an opportunity to explore innovative solutions to error mitigation while considering the tradeoffs in performance, complexity, and scalability inherent to these approaches.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

DARPA Validation & Technical Credibility
Selection by DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO) signals exceptional technical rigor and alignment with DARPA’s high-risk, high-reward biotechnology priorities. This validation materially strengthens credibility with strategic partners, investors, and future government customers.

Non-Dilutive Advancement of Breakthrough Biotechnology
GO awards enable teams to mature foundational, high-risk biological technologies using non-dilutive capital. Companies can advance technically ambitious platforms without sacrificing equity, increasing both technical readiness and enterprise value.

Access to DARPA Program Leadership & Expert Networks
Awardees engage directly with DARPA program managers, technical reviewers, and advisory working groups throughout the program. This access provides rare insight into government priorities, technical expectations, and future transition considerations.

Commercialization Support & Structured Market Exposure
GO performers receive guidance from an Independent Commercialization and Consulting Group (ICCG) and participate in structured commercialization workshops and pitch events. These activities help teams refine business hypotheses, market positioning, and transition strategies alongside experienced investors and operators.

Enhanced Visibility Across the Biotechnology Ecosystem
Participation in a DARPA flagship biology program elevates company visibility across the defense, academic, and commercial biotech ecosystems—positioning awardees as leaders in next-generation genetic and optogenetic technologies.

Stronger Long-Term Exit & Transition Potential
By maturing core technology under DARPA sponsorship and demonstrating government-backed technical progress, companies strengthen their positioning for follow-on funding, strategic partnerships, and long-term acquisition or licensing opportunities.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The process begins with a 5-page abstract due January 16, 2026.. Selected teams are invited to present an in-person Oral Proposal Package. Phase 1 awards follow oral presentations, subject to funding availability. Phase 1 runs 12 months, with a major down-selection at month 9. Phase 2, if awarded, runs an additional 30 months

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) within the Department of Defense, through DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), using Other Transaction (OT) for Prototype authority.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include U.S. and non-U.S. companies, startups, universities, nonprofits, and research institutions, including nontraditional defense contractors and small businesses. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) and government entities may apply with additional eligibility documentation. All performers must be able to accept an OT agreement and comply with export control and CUI requirements.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive teams will demonstrate deep expertise in protein engineering, optogenetics, enzymatic nucleic acid synthesis, and computational biology, with a credible plan to integrate these into a functioning system in living cells. DARPA emphasizes technically bold, high-risk approaches that directly address program metrics rather than incremental biology research.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. The program excludes human and animal research, embryonic stem cells, bioprospecting for new natural proteins, substantial hardware development, in vitro assembly workflows, and systems that operate outside the central dogma. Phase 2 work involves Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), requiring NIST 800-171–compliant systems and DARPA security coordination.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most teams should expect 4–6 weeks to prepare a competitive abstract, including technical framing, team formation, and compliance review. Invited teams will need additional time to prepare a detailed Oral Proposal Package, cost models, and milestone plans under DARPA’s OT structure

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

$4,000 for Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Space Domain Awareness Solutions CSO

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Space Force Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) is awarding up to $6 million through a multi-year Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) to small businesses developing innovative Space Domain Awareness (SDA) solutions. Companies submit short white papers under specific Areas of Interest (AOIs), with AOI-2025_01 closing January 20, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding amounts are determined at the AOI and proposal level. For AOI-2025_01, awards are expected to come from a shared ~$1.5M funding pool across multiple AOIs. The Government may fund all, some, or part of a proposed solution, depending on mission priority, technical merit, and available funds.

What could I use the funding for?

SpOC/S33Z – SDA Capability Enhancement seeks research, development, and prototyping efforts that advance state-of-the-art methods for managing, analyzing, and exploiting space sensor data. The dynamic and challenging SDA environment requires novel approaches that go beyond traditional software development, with emphasis on experimental techniques, proof-of-concept demonstrations, and technology maturation that can transition into operational use.

Technical Focus Areas (TFAs)

Offerors may propose solutions aligned with one or more of the following TFAs. All submissions should emphasize the R&D aspect of their approach, with deliverables expected to include prototypes, models, and/or experimental frameworks rather than production-ready systems.

• TFA 1: Scalable, Adaptable Data Management Tools

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Research and prototyping of new database or data architecture approaches for storing and managing sensor observations, state vectors, and metadata.

  • Experimental tools for data format translation/conversion to enable integration across platforms or analysis pipelines.

  • Innovative methods for tagging, indexing, and organizing traditional and non-traditional sensor data (e.g., radar, EO/IR, passive RF).

• TFA 2: Modeling and Analytics for Enhanced Accuracy and Optimization

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Development and validation of new modeling techniques to determine LEO sensor performance requirements.

  • Research into space environmental models to support phased array radar performance assessments.

  • Exploration of methods for dynamic weighting of sensor observations.

  • Prototyping of modeling/simulation tools to assess the impact of sensor network topology changes.

  • Experimental accuracy assessment tools for passive RF systems, mobile sensors, or degraded data environments.

• TFA 3: Agile Software Prototyping and Transition

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Exploration of approaches to integrate or reuse government-developed astrodynamics models/toolkits in new prototypes.

  • Rapid prototyping of experimental software to address SDA operational challenges.

  • Research into refactoring methods that enable rapid prototypes to evolve into maintainable, deployable systems without full-scale redevelopment.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

Government Validation & Technical Credibility
Being selected by the U.S. Space Force Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) signals strong technical credibility and alignment with Space Domain Awareness (SDA) mission priorities—significantly strengthening trust with primes, integrators, and future DoD customers.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation
CSO awards enable companies to advance high-risk, high-impact SDA software and analytics technologies using non-dilutive capital, preserving founder equity while increasing enterprise value and technical maturity.

Access to Space Force Operational Stakeholders
Awardees gain direct exposure to Space Force operators, technical leads, and acquisition personnel within the SDA enterprise—creating opportunities for transition paths, follow-on AOIs, and future operational adoption.

Increased Visibility & Notoriety
Participation in Space Force–funded R&D enhances visibility across the national security space ecosystem, including government stakeholders, defense primes, and the broader space technology community.

Strengthened Exit / Acquisition Potential
Demonstrating government-backed progress in SDA capabilities positions companies for strategic partnerships, follow-on contracts, or acquisition by major defense and space industry primes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Phase I submissions consist of a white paper and short PowerPoint briefing. For AOI-2025_01, white papers close January 20, 2026. Selected companies may be invited to pitch sessions and then submit a full proposal. Award notifications typically occur within ~45 days of evaluation, with contract start dates generally ~90 days after final proposal submission.

Where does this funding come from?

This funding is provided by the U.S. Space Force, administered through the Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) under DFARS 212.70 Commercial Solutions Opening authority.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is limited to U.S. entities. AOI-2025_01 is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS 541715. Offerors must comply with NIST SP 800-171 cybersecurity requirements and be eligible for federal contracting.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Winning teams are typically small businesses with strong technical depth in space data, analytics, modeling, or software R&D, and a clear understanding of SDA mission needs. Competitive proposals emphasize innovation, feasibility, and operational relevance, while remaining realistic in scope, schedule, and cost.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Phase I submissions must be unclassified. Foreign participation is prohibited due to export control and national security restrictions. The Government will acquire only minimum necessary data rights, allowing companies to retain ownership of their core IP.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most teams should expect 4–6 weeks to prepare a compliant Phase I submission, including the quad chart, PowerPoint briefing, and white paper. Founders should plan additional time if cybersecurity documentation or internal technical alignment is needed.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Emerging Weapons, Munitions Systems, and Soldier Lethality BAA

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Army’s Emerging Weapons and Munitions Systems & Soldier Lethality BAA invites industry and academia to submit innovative R&D concepts that advance a wide variety of critical armament technologies. The program remains open through March 17, 2026, and white papers may be submitted at any time.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings. Awards may be:

• Contracts for basic/applied research

• Other Transactions for Research or Prototypes (including cost-share requirements in some cases)

• Multi-year efforts, typically up to three years, with incremental funding.

The scope and cost depend entirely on the proposed technical approach and feasibility.

What could I use the funding for?

The U.S. Army Futures Command’s Army Modernization Strategy (AMS) will catapult the U.S. Army forward to meet its enduring responsibility as part of the Joint Force to provide for the defense of the United States, and retain and secure its position by 2035 as the globally dominant land power. The end state is a modernized Army capable of conducting Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) as part of an integrated Joint Force in a single theater. The MDO concept describes how the Army will support the Joint Force in the rapid and continuous integration of all domains of warfare – land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace – to deter and prevail as we compete short of conflict, and fight and win if deterrence fails.

The modernization strategy shifts the top focus to mid-term modernization, while maintaining readiness for current operations. The six Army modernization priorities – long range precision fires, next generation combat vehicles, future vertical lift, network, air and missile defense, and soldier lethality are the pillars of our future success. Additionally, the Army will continue to reform its business processes, shifting from Industrial Age to Information Age approaches.

It is anticipated that many future technology developments will be made in conjunction with the tools of the Information Age. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is considered as a key tool needed to bring next-generation technology to the warfighter on time, and at minimal costs.

M&S should be incorporated into technology developmental efforts whenever possible. Additionally, it is believed that concepts like the Containerized Software Applications & Orchestration, DevSecOps, Government Cloud Software Factories, Internet of Things (IOT), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cyber Security (CS) will play increasingly more prominent roles in many of the technologies that will be developed to provide the battlefield overmatch that we need, and to keep our warfighter safe.

The U.S. Army Armaments Center’s Business Interface Office is looking to identify and develop technologies for the purpose of addressing key elements of the Army’s modernization priorities. Efforts under this BAA should focus on the development and demonstration of technology for current and future generation munitions and armament systems, including Logistics. This shall be accomplished via investigative research efforts in the following general technology areas:

• 1. ADVANCED MATERIALS

  The Government has the need for investigations and research into the development and demonstration of advanced materials for weapons and munitions applications. This shall include advanced alloy systems, polymers and composites that can reduce parasitic weight, increase performance (lethality, range, etc.), extend shelf life, reduce item costs, conserve strategic materials, etc. Materials of interest include, but are not limited to: titanium, tantalum, tungsten, steel, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, ceramics, cermets, rare earth metals, polymer-based composites, filled composite materials and metal-matrix composites. Processes and production systems to manufacture, as well as specialized tools and methodologies for characterization, testing, and analysis of these advanced materials, are also desired.

  The Government is interested in materials that will reduce weight, improve ballistics or provide protection to extend the service life of the barrels and other components of small, medium and large caliber weapon systems. These materials may be associated with coatings e.g. cold spray, plasma spray, laser deposition, high velocity oxygen fuel, laser peening, etc.; surface modification i.e. superfine finishing, or material substitutions such as ceramic, polymer and/or composite materials. The behavior of materials in service conditions such as crack initiation and growth, as well as fatigue behavior of materials is of interest. Additionally, nano-materials hold great promise either in themselves or in combination with other materials to increase the performance of the base materials. Processes, which produce unique material characteristics with a nano-size grain structure are of interest.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are materials for hypersonic applications, materials subject to high thermal stress, active countermeasure materials, frangible ammunition alloys, thermoelectric materials, high efficiency insulation materials etc.

• 2. ELECTRONICS / SENSORS

  The Government has the need for efforts addressing fabrication technology R&D for micro- system chips based on the silicon, deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) process. This technology is to be utilized for miniature electronic board applications. Processed chips will be applied for microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices for Safe and Arm and micro-initiation components. The Government has the need for efforts in the R&D of anti-tamper systems for remote armament systems. Anti-tampering systems are needed in increasing numbers, as military priority capability needs for autonomous tactical behaviors, autonomous movement, and manned/unmanned lethality are growing. Solutions are being sought to protect remote armament systems on the battlefield, in urban environments and in storage. The R&D efforts should include a capability that tracks tampering attempts made on unmanned systems. Anti-tamper systems that are capable of deactivating battery-operated unmanned systems are needed as well. The Government has a need for efforts in the R&D of micro-system packaging and micro-system architecture for input into remote armament systems. Novel optical, electrical and hermetic sealing techniques and capabilities will be needed to support this effort.

  The Government also has need of efforts in the R&D of advanced distributed sensors (radar, electro-optics, infrared, direction finding) to provide fire control solutions supporting existing and emerging DEVCOM-AC weapon systems. Different sensors must provide detection range (minimum and maximum), angular coverage (ideally hemispherical or better), update rates, and measurement accuracies necessary for a given application within the appropriate timelines to assure that countermeasures are effective against a wide variety of threats including ground vehicles, unmanned air systems, direct and indirect fire. The sensors must also operate within size, weight, and power constraints of target platforms. Designs should also be developed with cost in mind. Sensor systems should also, to the extent possible, operate on the move. The sensors must operate in a variety of environments (dust, fog, rain, etc.) and should meet MIL- STD requirements for electromagnetic interference, electromagnetic compatibility, temperature, pressure, other environmental conditions, etc., as appropriate. In particular, sensors must be capable of operating in increasingly congested electromagnetic environments. They should be capable of multiple modes, missions, and applications, and, as such, should be easily configurable/re-programmable. The sensors must have good clutter/background cancellation capability and be able to discriminate amongst targets – allowing accurate, automatic identification of threat targets, while rejecting targets that are not of interest. Along with discrimination, there is also a need for sensors to be able to determine threat intent. Both discrimination and threat intent, in turn, require labeled data sets for algorithm development and/or training of machine learning (ML)/artificial intelligence (AI) processors. Sensors should use open, modular, scalable architectures to the extent possible. In addition, for specific missions, sensors should be compliant with appropriate standards or architectures (e.g. the U. S. Army’s Modular Active Protection System framework). They should also be designed for manufacturability, maintainability, upgradability, and flexibility. Sensors should be designed such that they can be used on a variety of platforms with the appropriate integration packages/kits.

  DEVCOM-AC continues to seek new, innovative methods for enhanced lethality by disrupting anti access area denial (A2AD) systems at extended ranges in contested operational environments. This includes munitions delivered non-kinetic effects to deceive, degrade, and deny adversarial sensor systems and infrastructure. The capability should be scalable, focused on peer adversaries in a major conflict by employing a complex diversity on non-kinetic effects for offensive purposes, such as directly defeating adversary capability, delaying and degrading counter fire, and creating uncertainty and confusion. Munitions delivered non-kinetic effects will require distributed, collaborate, and autonomous behaviors to engage a peer adversary, and enhance diversity of the effects. Development of key enablers will be required in the domain of distributed autonomy, including munitions hardened hardware, field upgradeable software, tactics, primitives, and algorithms. In addition to offensive EW capability, the USG also has a need for non-kinetic effectors for use in counter unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) scenarios and in defensive postures.

  As capability increases and munition payloads become more complex, the USG anticipates that there will be an added emphasis on the miniaturization and capability of all on board electronic components. This would include, but is not limited to, the payload capabilities listed above, onboard sensors and onboard electronics.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are unique technologies that address:

  a. Low phase noise oscillators

  b. High-efficiency power amplifiers

  c. Small tunable bandpass filters

  d. Distributed local oscillator architectures

  e. Advanced clutter and multipath mitigation techniques

  f. Machine learning/artificial intelligence techniques supporting discrimination, threat intent, etc.

  g. Special-purpose integrated circuits, including RF systems on chips

  h. Advanced lightweight materials

  i. Additive manufacturing

  j. Active electronic phased arrays

  k. Digital antenna array architectures

  l. Precise antenna calibration techniques

  m. Advanced electronic protection techniques

  n. High-performance, heterogeneous processing “backends”

  o. Built-in test and diagnostics

  p. Collaborative non-kinetic techniques

  q. Sense, Target, Engage Autonomy

  r. Munition hardened payloads and antennas

  s. Scalable and field upgradeable software frameworks

  t. Beyond Line of Sight Techniques

  u. Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems

  v. Data Fusion

  w. Artificial Intelligence deep learning for classifications

  Additional items include gun launchable sensors, environmental sensing technologies, flexible printed/hybrid electronics, novel inks for printed electronics applications, interconnects for flexible electronics, novel substrate materials, and low power electronic components.

• 3. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY

  The Government has a need for research efforts to establish the science behind the manufacture of quality weapon and munitions components, and the integrated data environment that will allow the process knowledge to be retained by the Army in a central repository for future use. These efforts shall address the identification, definition and understanding of materials, equipment, processing and procedures associated with the manufacture of weapons and munitions components; and the capture of that information so that this knowledge can be readily transferred to the industrial base for use in component manufacture using qualification and certification practices to instill quality, reliability, and safety. Efforts shall also address the integration of the 3D-Technical Data Package philosophy in the design to manufacturing cycle, and the sharing of digital information across dissimilar systems. Efforts that enhance DEVCOM-AC’s ability to understand the underlying science of component manufacture or further DEVCOM-AC’s capability to document and transfer manufacturing processes are desirable. Additionally, efforts that establish manufacturing science test beds, including Additive Manufacturing, to complement DEVCOM-AC’s prototyping capabilities are encouraged.

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in manufacturing and fabricating components for weapon and munitions systems. Of high interest are technologies that will extend the life of high-value components, such as small, medium and large caliber gun barrels. These technologies may be associated with coatings e.g. cold spray, plasma spray, laser deposition, high velocity oxygen fuel coating, laser peening, intensive quenching, etc.; and surface modification, i.e. superfine finishing, or material substitutions such as ceramic materials. Also, processes that reduce weight of system components, or extend performance either in terms of life, ballistics, or protection are of interest. Finally, the Government is interested in emerging technologies that can eliminate the use of Cr+6 based (hexavalent chromium) surface treatments used on weapon system components to include, but not limited to, gun barrels, recoil mechanisms, aircraft landing gear assemblies, etc. These processes shall be environmentally- compliant and provide equivalent, or better, performance as compared to Cr+6 -based surface treatments.

  Further, the Government is interested in manufacturing processes to reduce cost, cycle time, and fabricate parts where price is independent of quantity. Examples of such processes include rapid prototyping technology, and free forming technology whether laser based, plasma based, or polymer based. Our vision of the future requires a “paperless process” from designer to machine. Inherent in this process are several subsets including a “model centric” design environment, including intelligent machining, joining, and processing. One goal is to add intelligence to machine tools to enable them to do a self-assessment, self-programming, self- diagnostics, self-scheduling, and in-process monitoring using both software and sensor tools capable of surviving in the harsh processing environment. Lastly, the Government is interested in fiber optic technology, and remote sensing or optics necessary for such systems; and technologies that instill intelligence in processes or machine tools e.g. modeling, data analysis, data fusion, etc.

  The Government is interested in proposals to support our “model centric” design environment to rapidly advance the state of the art in modeling, simulation, design, manufacturing, and field support of components for weapon systems. Specifically, the Government has interest in technologies that transition from development to production of advanced design methodologies, and ensure that this transition occurs seamlessly and with the greatest possible understanding of manufacturing process capability in relation to design intent. It will be essential to establish process capability relative to design intent baselines and goals (i.e., Cp, CpK) and put the disciplines, methodologies, and tools in place to meet these goals. Additionally, the Government is interested in design expertise, methodologies and tools to achieve “quality” hardware from the very start of production and throughout the program production life cycle. The expertise and tools may include the capability to define and flow complex requirements at the characteristic level through multiple layers of the supply chain. It will also include the ability to simulate optimum processes and tooling for material and machined parts, seamlessly document process capability in relation to design intent, and provide for continuing improvement of both design and manufacturing processes; and provide the capability to capture, link, trace, analyze, and manage requirements to manufacturing processes.

• 4. POWER AND ENERGY

  The Government has a need for efforts in the development and demonstration of Novel Power, Energy Harvesting, Energy Storage and Energy Management Systems, i.e., develop and demonstrate the critical components for improved reserve batteries, hybrid power sources, and other novel power sources to include micro generators, super and ultra-capacitors, power harvesting and power distribution concepts. Fuel cell and Lithium (or Li Ion) battery research and manufacturing technology development are also possible areas for projects.

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in materials and technology for sustainable energy and environmental protection. Specifically, the Government is interested in materials and technology that will provide for improved power density, energy efficiency, reduced logistics and/or weight burden, and overall sustainability of energy sources during military deployment, and with a clean environmental footprint. Additionally, future concepts will require technologies that support significantly extended range with performance at elevated temperatures, increased performance at cold temperatures, and the survivability of the Power and Energy subsystem through the dynamic launch event. Technologies of interest include, but are not limited to, those for power and energy conversion, power generation, energy storage and recovery, renewable energy, and hybrid intelligent management technologies.

  Materials of interest include, but are not limited to, coatings/materials to improve efficiency of photovoltaic and/or thermo-electric generators, novel materials for weight reduction and improved performance in batteries, materials for forward deployable sustainable energy systems, etc. Technologies proposed should demonstrate dual-use applications and have direct application to the Warfighter. Additionally, the Government is interested in innovative research that can lead to portable, efficient, and compact power technologies that enhance the military’s reach, decrease the logistical burden, and improve energy efficiency at all levels. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, innovative energy conversion, energy harvesting, micro- scale power sources, storage and recovery technologies, renewable energy, including solar and wind, energy harvesting/scavenging technologies, hybrid intelligent management technologies, alternative energy systems, fuel cells, and micro-grid forward deployable energy solutions. Also, the development of advanced novel electric and magnetic materials and coatings/materials that improve energy efficiency and enable sustainable power and energy technologies is of interest as well as novel coatings/materials for photovoltaic and thermo-electric generators, advanced nano- composites for turbine technology, enabling coatings/materials for advanced oil-free turbo- machinery or alternative approaches, or high temperature materials to reduce weight and increase efficiency of high temperature engines, novel battery materials, etc. In addition, the Government is interested in innovative research that can lead to portable, efficient, and compact power technologies that increase our military’s reach, decrease the logistics burden, and improve the overall efficiency of our war fighting forces, especially for distributed and net-centric operations.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are Improved thermal reserve and liquid reserve battery chemistries, micro-generators, capacitors, flexible/conformal batteries, thermoelectric materials, energy harvesting processes, batteries with improved cold weather performance (down to -40C), etc., while supporting significantly extended range, and performance at elevated temperatures.

• 5. ENERGETICS INNOVATION

  The Government is interested in advancing the state of the art in Energetic Material technology within the entire lifecycle of explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics, from concept through disposal. Potential areas of interest include new methodologies in modeling and simulation such as packages to calculate the performance and signature properties of propellants, pyrotechnics, or explosive properties of ideal and non-ideal explosives. In addition to modeling and simulation, the Government has a desire to build and test the new propellants. This would include both static and dynamic testing. The Government also has a need for new synthesis methods; design and synthesis of energetic molecules, oxidizers, and binders; novel scale up synthesis and crystallization techniques, new analysis methods and specification modernization, and non- CHNO very high energy density materials. In terms of energy output, novel concepts that result in much greater energy density and/or energy availability within timeframes and volumes of typical high performance explosive, pyrotechnic, and propellants is desired. Tailored and tailorable burn properties for propellants and pyrotechnic signatures are desired for a variety of systems. Multi-purpose effects from a single explosive or warhead are also desired, such as blast, fragmentation, metal pushing, and electromagnetic effects. In the realm of formulations for propellant, explosive, and pyrotechnics, there is a need for energetics and mixtures that exhibit extreme compressive strength and toughness; new binders and additives for pressing, curing, and strengthening formulations; tailored surface and mechanical properties, and improved aging and high temperature and severe environment resilience. Novel processing technologies are needed in the following areas: higher throughput of melt pour, cast cure, and pressed explosive, propellant, and pyrotechnic formulations; creation and characterization of amorphous and nanoscale formulations, filling advanced geometry warheads, and tailoring of flow properties.

  New ideas in the realm of novel disposal and energetics recycling and repurposing are also of interest, such as on-demand or reversible chemical bonding for demilitarization technologies.

  The Government has a need for development and demonstration of reliable energetic quality verification methods in an industrial environment. These efforts shall address both verification of bulk ingredients and final formulations. The demonstration shall include considerations of the issues resulting from increasing production quantities and sampling method selection decisions.

• 6. REVOLUTIONARY ARMAMENT DESIGN CONCEPTS

  The Government has the need for efforts that address the R&D of Advance Design Technologies. The technologies for R&D efforts include threat recognition, targeting, system communication of mission commands, remotely operated platforms, weapon systems and weapon systems security, control unit systems, battlefield automation systems, software/performance analysis, emerging software technologies, embedded systems, navigational guidance platforms, integrated user interfaces and processors, computer based systems, orientation and ranging technologies, enhanced software algorithm development and software sustainment/supportability as each relates to embedded software residency in weapons, improvements to existing systems and development of new systems, including the design, development, fabrication of hardware and electronics of these systems. Mission objectives are to enhance supported platforms, reliability, performance, capability, response time, and accuracy in meeting the Army’s Vision.

  As part of the Advanced Design Technologies, airframes that have the capability to maneuver more and fly further, plus reach targets at hyper-velocities, would be of interest. The airframes can also have embedded novel propulsion technology, in order to reach the targets in a faster time. Novel material technology shall be explored for the purpose of launch survivability for hypervelocity launches, for actuation, and for shape changing of the outer mold line during flight. The motivation behind shape changing is the elimination of moving parts such as actuators which can be a burden on internal volume, and also can be an expensive item for the munition. Maneuvering capabilities can be enhanced through the use of the advanced morphing materials, since macro changes on the body shape can be accomplished instead of relying on deflecting canards using conventional motors. Ultimately, it will be essential to validate the performance through testing.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Novel Propulsion Design

  b. Morphing airframes for optimizing maneuvers

  c. Advanced material for weight reduction and launch survivability improvement

• 7. FUZE TECHNOLOGY

  The Government is interested in next-generation technologies that will address pressing needs in fuze technology development. As seen below, miniaturization, reliability, manufacturability, and the ability to survive high “G” (G = acceleration of gravity) gun launch are critical attributes to be addressed. Specific research needs are outlined below.

  7.1 Initiation Technologies

  The Government has a need for research efforts addressing the R&D of in-line multi-point initiation technology that can accommodate 10’s of initiation points. Of specific interest are multi-point architectures that will scale up to 30-50 points of initiation while minimizing integration burden and volume in the warhead assembly. Initiation point simultaneity, selectivity and the ability to withstand gun launch “G” loads are key attributes that must be satisfied.

  The Government is also seeking technology for the research, development, integration and demonstration of improved Electronic Safe and Arm Devices (ESADs) and advanced ESAD components. Of specific interest are technologies that will reduce the technical risk and improve the reliability and performance of ESADs while also reducing the size and cost of ESADs. One goal of these technologies is to allow ESADs to be utilized in high-G hard target applications such as artillery and other indirect fire munitions. Miniaturized passive first-safety-environmental sensors are a priority along with the next generation of G- hardened Exploding Foil Initiators. Research to develop miniaturized, high voltage components such as low cost switches, capacitors, and transformers is also needed. Novel integration techniques that will reduce the cost or size of today's component technologies will also be considered.

  7.2 Improved Fuzes and Components for Hand Grenades, Sub-Munitions, Mortars and Artillery

  The Government is seeking proposals for the research and development of an improved miniature Micro-Electromechanical Systems (MEMS) Safe and Arm (S&A) device including necessary energetics for gun launched munitions. The ability to survive gun launch, size minimization and manufacturability are key attributes that the technology must address. The Government is also interested in research into design improvements for improved manufacturability including energetics integration into MEMS devices that can be used across the whole portfolio of munitions.

  The Government is also seeking proposals for the research into and the development of improved highly reliable sub-munition fuzes. Proposals should address improvements in the areas of design, manufacturability, loading, and assembly of sub-munition fuzes, and related components. The goal of this research is to increase the Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) of sub-munition fuze assembly to MRL6. This effort supports the development of Science & Technology (S&T) concepts under DEVCOM-AC’s Cluster Munition Replacement Technology effort.

  Further, the Government is seeking proposals for the research into and the development of fuzes and fuze components that will improve producibility, performance, accuracy, consistency or function requirements of hand grenades. Research will include development of prototype hardware components including, but are not limited to, fuze assemblies (inert or live), fuze bodies, levers, hinge pins, strikers, springs, pull pins, pull rings, energetic components or energetic compositions that will demonstrate improved capabilities such as pull-force, delay time, and fuze outputs along with improved producibility.

  7.3 Fuze Power Sources

  The Government is seeking proposals for research into the development of low cost, robust prototype power sources for advanced extended range munitions. The Government is interested in novel thermal and liquid reserve battery technologies and energy harvesting technologies that demonstrate extended run times greater than 3 minutes over temperature extremes of interest. Solutions which demonstrate a higher energy density and power density through integration of new electrode materials, insulation materials or novel construction of battery/power source are of interest to meet this requirement.

  7.4 Advanced Proximity / Height of Burst Sensors

  The Government is seeking proposals for research into the development and demonstration of advanced proximity / Height of Burst sensor systems capable of being integrated into munition systems. Areas of interest include Radio Frequency, Optical, and Image based proximity sensor technologies. Custom components for use in these systems are also of interest to include transmitters, receivers, apertures, and signal processors (digital and analog Application Specific Integrated Circuit). Solutions which demonstrate high levels of integration and being capable of integration into a wide variety of munitions are of highest interest.

  7.5 Fuze / Mission Setters

  The Government is seeking proposals for research and development of secure spread spectrum wireless fuze mission setting capability. Also of interest is wireless power transfer for systems within near field ranges (less than 10m). Demonstration of this technology would be in support of long range precision fires auto-loader integration goals within the Army.
  

• 8. AUTONOMY; GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL

  The Department of Defense, DOD, has been for many years been researching, developing and manufacturing smart munitions that can withstand thousands of “g” loads during launch. The development of these munitions has focused in areas such of power, electronics, inertial measurements, actuators, rocket motors and seekers. The DOD has been able to make great strides in all these areas with the result being the testing, manufacturing and fielding of gun launched smart munitions for the U.S. Army. With that said, areas such as autonomy, and state- of-the-art guidance, navigation and control technologies will need significant R&D efforts.

  Since there is a need for long range precision guidance, technologies that will enable a munition to fly faster and further, be more accurate in acquiring targets, with the ability to conduct midcourse corrections (with and without the use of GPS), will be essential. Autonomy can be introduced into the field of operations by designing a munition that is not only smart, due to its electronics and navigation, but will also have the ability to communicate with other munitions in flight. An example may be a leader / follower scenario where you have several smart munitions that are fired in a volley. The leader munition will then be communicating with the other munitions, and will be providing them with information of targets so they, in turn, can make corrections in flight in order to prosecute various targets. This area is a new field of study called “Collaborative Control”. Because of the increase in launch velocities needed for longer ranges, longer flight times and enhanced maneuverability to go after moving targets, R&D efforts to define more accurate robust navigation and position transmission technologies will be necessary especially if munitions need to communicate with one another. Methods of accurately measuring the projectile flight dynamics can include state-of-the-art technologies that will improve projectile on board state estimation without GPS satellite data. In this GPS denied scenario, terrain mapping can be a method in improving accuracy. With that said, downloading maps to the munition, and having the munition recognize optically the sites on the ground in order to improve its position estimation will be of critical importance. Another possibility can be to use celestial navigation in conjunction with terrain mapping. However, there is a need for innovative research into terrain mapping, celestial navigation or other state of the art methods in order to improve accuracy for the smart munitions.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES:

  a. Collaborative Control

  b. Terrain mapping for position estimation accuracy

  c. Celestial navigation

• 9. DISRUPTIVE LETHALITY CONCEPTS

  The Government is interested in research into next generation warhead and lethal mechanism technologies that contribute to providing more energy on target, enabling multi-domain lethality against a wide range of target sets, and maintaining lethality as warhead volumes are reduced in size to accommodate other munition system components.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest is research to develop the technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Warhead scaling effects and optimization

  b. Fabrication using novel materials

  c. Advanced modeling & simulation capabilities that account for the use of novel materials

  d. Collaborative lethal effects

  e. Warheads with multiple modes of operation

  f. Novel initiation schemes

  g. Survivability in extreme environments

  h. Advanced fragmentation

  i. Split Hopkinson Bar Technology

  j. Advanced lethality modeling

  k. Long standoff, aero-stable warhead concepts

  l. Anti-armor warhead concepts

  m. Counter-UAS/Counter-RAM technologies

  n. Advanced warhead testing and diagnostic capabilities description

• 10. ADVANCED FIRE CONTROL

  The U.S. Army is interested in research proposals related to emerging Fire Control technology. Specific areas for research include: (1) Advanced Technical Fire Control; (2) Position / Navigation; (3) Advanced Algorithms; (4) Advanced System Controllers; (5) Biometric and Human Machine Interface Technologies; (6) Photonics and Quantum Science Technologies, and (7) Live, Virtual and Embedded Fire Control Trainers

  Specific research needs are outlined below.

  10.1 Advanced Technical Fire Control

  The Government is in need of research to develop direct view Optics, Electro-Optic, Sighting systems or their components in support of the military’s mission to provide superior military equipment to our warfighters. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Develop Optics material and/or equipment

  b. Develop state of the art electro-optics, fiber-optics and sighting system technologies

  c. Advance study of threat capabilities

  d. Develop better understanding from analysis gained from experimentation

  e. Air & Ground Platform Signature Reduction

  f. Dismounted Target Acquisition Optical Capability

  g. Improved Soldier Protection

  h. Sensor/effects packages (to deny access to critical points and provide force protection)

  i. Soldier Signature Reduction

  j. Use modeling and simulation to determine survivability

  k. Bio-mimicry advances in flexible Photo-detectors, Smart Optics, Adaptive Optics, Advanced Weapon Sight (aiming reticle)

  l. Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS)

  m. Improved Situational Awareness

  n. Improved position sensors

  For the Advanced Technical Fire Control subtopic the Government is in need of research to develop direct view Optics and new sighting technologies in support of the military’s mission and ground based platforms.

  10.2 Position / Navigation

  The Government is in need of research to develop position or navigation sensors such as, but not limited to, non-magnetic compasses, gyroscopes, inclinometers and accelerometers in support of the military’s mission to provide superior military equipment to our Warfighters.

  This research is directed to advance the capabilities of PNT (Position, Navigation, Timing). The emphasis is to develop advancements in laser gyros, next-Gen ASIC chipsets and capabilities to function in anti-spoof and anti-jam environments.

  10.3 Advanced Algorithms

  10.3.1

  Architecture

  The Government is in need of research to demonstrate rapid sensor-to-shooter target hand-off at all echelons that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics include:

  a. Reduced soldier/leader cognitive work load

  b. Seamless integration of manned and unmanned effects assets

  c. GPS denied soldier tracking

  d. Lethal UV integration

  10.3.2 Target Acquisition

  The Government is in need of research to demonstrate an auto-tracker in small, medium and large weapon sighting systems and improved target range information that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Closed Loop Fire Control / Data Links

  b. Projectile tracking and closed loop improvement

  c. Correcting for miss distances

  d. Target State Estimation (TSE) / Prediction

  e. Auto Tracking

  f. Auto / Aided Cueing

  g. Aiming Aides

  h. Ballistic Algorithms / Computation

  i. Advanced Meteorological Measurements and Prediction

  j. Multiple/many target handing/prioritization (ie swarm)

  k. Automated target detection, recognition and identification

  10.4 Advanced System Controllers

  The Government is in need of research to develop an innovative system controller that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Small Footprint

  b. Reduced Power Consumption

  c. Ruggedization Technology

  d. LRM Form Factor

  e. Expandable Interfaces

  f. Standard Architecture

  g. Simultaneous Multiple OS

  h. Self-Diagnosing/Self Reporting BIT

  i. Remote Display/User Input Capability via Standard Interface (e.g. Ethernet)

  10.5 Biometric and Human Machine Interface Technologies

  a. The Government is in need of research to develop biometric and human to machine interface systems for Armament Systems or the individual components that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any potential threats. Research topics of interest include: Sensors that can collect biometric information, while on the move and/or stationary, about personnel, or other potential threats.

  b. Software and/or hardware systems that can store, analyze biometric data, detect and/or classify threats, and/or any other information useful for the warfighter

  c. Weapon systems with biometrics capabilities

  d. Human machine sensor interface technologies that can receive and/or provide input directly between weapon systems and warfighter organic sensor network

  e. Brain machine interface technologies that allow neurologic link directly between warfighter and fire control systems

  10.6 Photonics and Quantum Science Technologies

  The Government is in need of research to develop photonics and quantum science technologies for Armament Applications. Some areas of interest are:

  a. Photonics and quantum based technologies for potential Fire Control Technologies including but not limited to target acquisition and tracking, signature reduction, and potential spoofing technology.

  b. Integrated photonics for the reduction of size, weight, and power for Fire Control and other Armament Systems.

  c. Advanced computer hardware technologies for high performance, power efficient computing, particularly in austere environments.

  d. Photonics and quantum based technologies for the next generation of PNT technologies for Armament applications.

  e. Target acquisition technologies for obscured targets, either obscured by environment or camouflage.

  f. Photonics technologies for the advanced control of laser wave fronts for Fire Control applications.

  g. Software technologies appropriate for the analysis of low photon target image processing and associated machine learning approaches for target recognition.

  h. Photonics technologies for laser protection.

  10.7 Live, Virtual and Embedded Fire Control Trainers

  The Government is in need of research to develop embedded interfaces and advanced visualization systems that utilize fire control systems for areas of live, virtual and embedded training that meets the military's need to maintain readiness of the warfighter as expert system operators and able to maximize lethality potentials of armament systems. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Computer vision and graphics

  b. Small Footprint

  c. Ruggedization Technologies

  d. Low bandwidth secure networking

  In conclusion - For the Advanced Fire Control Topic: Of unique interest at this time is research associated with the following:

  a. Unmanned & autonomous systems that can provide advancements in target info to Fire Control

  b. Sensor fusion methods and networks to increase fire control and diagnostic effectiveness

  c. Down range wind sensors

  d. Dynamic Fires Planning and Execution

  e. Real time localized MET and environmental data for Fire Control corrections

• 11. NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS AND SUPPORTABILITY TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in force sustainment capabilities technologies that enhance armament supportability; ammunition health monitoring; ammunition packaging, storage, transportation and handling; ammunition forecasting; weapon rearm / resupply; battlefield manufacturing; sense and respond supply chain management technologies and methodologies that directly support providing Warfighters with the armaments, ammunition, and other equipment they need, when they need them and in the right condition.

  Specifically, the Government is interested in research into technologies and approaches that address the planning, setup and operation of supply nodes, tools based on best practices to evaluate and optimize the performance of supply operations throughout the entire armament and ammunition enterprise, and aggressive sustainment capabilities to improve the responsiveness and agility of sustainment operations at all echelons.

  The Government is also interested in researching technologies that provide ammunition health monitoring capabilities to understand the readiness of the ammunition stockpile and to ensure only fully functional ammunition items are issued and utilized. These monitoring capabilities may address exposure to (but not limited to) temperature, vibration, shock, humidity, and radiation, as they effect both existing and/or developmental systems.

  The Government requires technologies that help analyze, interpret, and evaluate the supportability implications of a system; predictive maintenance technologies; and technologies that improve how a system is supported. Additionally, the Government is interested in technologies and approaches to allow for quicker and advanced battlefield manufacturing processes and materials. Finally, the Government is interested in technologies that allow for automated rearm and resupply of armament systems.

  The research may address any or all aspects of the supply chain including production, transport, storage (short and long term), supply node operations, tactical distribution, and retrograde. The proposals may span from software/AI based planning, optimization and execution tools, to hardware-based distribution enablers to hybrid electro-mechanical systems, or any combination thereof technologies that improve how armament systems are supported.

  The Government has the need to establish and expand its quality presence in mitigating supply chain cybersecurity risks in the development, test and deployment of both software intensive systems (including hardware) whether for weapon system application, information system deployment or manufacturing internal control systems (hardware and software). We are looking for research into strategies equivalent up to and including, the State-of-the-Art Resource for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation, a.k.a. the “Software SOAR,” program, for software assurance, and analogous strategies for hardware assurance. The ultimate goal of the research is for the AC to become competent and relevant practitioners in the deployment of solutions for supply chain challenges from both an information and an operation technology perspective.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES:

  a. Environmental sensing, recording and logging technologies

  b. Systems to collect data from sensors that monitor the environment that an armament system and ammunition have been exposed to

  c. AI-based systems to manage the health of the ammunition stockpile through analyzing large datasets

  d. AI-based systems to aid with storage, planning and execution of the movement of ammunition horizontally and vertically throughout the ammunition supply chain against current and forecasted needs/consumptions

  e. AI-based systems to aid in the identification and prediction of supportability drivers and considerations for armament systems

  f. AI-based systems to provide predictive maintenance and repair information and solutions

  g. AI-based systems to aid in design and development processes

  h. Planning and execution hardware and software systems to optimize the planning and operation of supply nodes and maintenance facilities at all echelons

  i. AI based planning and execution systems that assist in planning and executing armament sustainment/movement operations

  j. AI based planning and execution systems that specifically target tactical ammunition distribution operations to ensure the ammunition supply chain is efficient, agile and responsive in direct support of tactical operations

  k. Systems that improve the ability to retrograde ammunition

  l. Material technologies for container/palletization

  m. Packaging/Pallet designs and interfaces that allow for more efficient containerization, palletization, or transportation of ammunition

  n. Hardware and software technologies that allow for faster printing and high fidelity of 3D printed parts

  o. AI-based decision systems to determine best supply alternative (Rapid Fabrication in field, DLA, local source, cannibalization, etc.) for repair to achieve optimum readiness

  p. Hardware and software technologies that allow for automated rearm and resupply

  q. Automated tracking of expenditures of serial–numbered items

  r. Solutions that monitor and prevent Cyber-attacks on the supply chain

  s. Data collection and analytical systems that determine optimal use of appropriate personnel and skills necessary to support armament systems

  t. Solutions that identify need for new, refresher, remedial, or other training for users of armament systems and then can deliver the exact training needed, when it is needed, in the most efficient manner

  u. Solutions to aid in the identification/prediction of obsolescence of hardware and software components for armament systems

• 12. ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEMIL TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government has interest in research into innovative technologies that improve environmental sustainability of life cycle stages for weapons and weapons systems. This includes manufacturing, production, maintenance, storage, use, demilitarization and disposal of ordnance such as mortars, flares, smokes, grenades, ammunition, energetics and explosives.

  Innovative technologies are intended to lead to new capabilities that improve Military readiness while protecting human health and the environment.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with the following:

  a. Wastewater treatment to reduce or eliminate soluble and insoluble concentrations of compounds such as RDX, HMX, DNAN, NTO, ANSOL, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia and other explosives and explosive degradation products

  b. Identify and eliminate emerging contaminants in munitions such as PFAS, hexavalent chromium, asbestos and methods to prevent air, water, or soil contamination during disposal by open burn, open detonation or incineration

  c. Process modeling or other methods to better understand treatment mechanisms and improved prediction of outcomes and effects on environmental safety and human health (ESOH)

  d. Novel technologies for enabling stand-off, remote or autonomous methods to disarm, and disassemble known, unknown, or undocumented munitions

  e. Research on the use of artificial intelligence for process control and predictive operations

  f. Surveillance methods to monitor the condition of air emissions, wastewater quality, and effectiveness of demilitarization processes to ascertain compliance with regulatory requirements

  g. Novel engineering to improve processing rates

  h. Innovative technologies for closed disposal of munitions

  i. Simultaneous demilitarization and disposal of mixed ordnance

  j. Research for methods to reduce impact of open burn or open detonation disposal of energetic and non-energetic materials on human health and the environment

  k. Eliminate the use of toxic chemicals such as Cr+6 based (hexavalent chromium) surface treatments used on weapon system components to include but not limited to gun barrels, recoil mechanisms, aircraft landing gear assemblies, etc. These processes shall be environmentally-compliant and provide equivalent, or better, performance as compared to Cr+6 -based surface treatments.

• 13. BIOMETRIC COLLECTION, MATCHING, ANALYSIS & SHARING

  DEVCOM-AC provides the Software Supportability mission for the PEO IEWS, PM DoD Biometrics - Biometrics Enabling Capabilities program of record. Consequently, the Government has the need for research into the development of biometric and identification technology. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art in the ability to detect, identify, characterize, and track items, activities, conditions, and events worldwide which will provide direct benefit to the warfighter. The Government has the need research efforts that analyze, improve, verify and validate biometric technology supporting the collect, match, analysis, and sharing functions of the DoD’s Biometrics Enterprise, including next generation tactical handheld collection devices. Current biometric technologies assist in providing these capabilities but are limited to the degree of which they can scale and meet future needs. More advanced biometric collection, storage, matching, analysis, and sharing systems will allow the Government enhanced situational awareness, and identity superiority on the battlefield for today’s mission as well as mission requirements far into the future.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Fingerprint, Face, Iris, Palm, Voice, DNA capture, feature extraction, templating, and matching

  b. Modular, scalable, lightweight, and portable imaging platforms

• 14. CONTAINERIZED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS & ORCHESTRATION

  The Government has the need for research efforts in the advancement of software container and container orchestration technology to increase the development, deployment, scalability and cybersecurity, of software applications of any size. Current software applications are difficult to scale and secure flexibly as mission requirements change resulting in significant requirements, architecture, design and implementation rework when using traditional software development technology and methodologies. Container & container orchestration technology will provide the Government modern capabilities to rapidly, flexibly, and securely deliver solutions to the warfighter at an unprecedented scale. Leveraging containerized software applications & orchestration supports the DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Initiative and USD AT&L Better Buying Power.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Open Standards Compliant, Cloud Agnostic Container and Container Orchestration

  b. Embedded Application & Safety Critical Container Implementations

• 15. GOVERNMENT CLOUD SOFTWARE FACTORIES ENABLING DEVSECOPS

  The Government has the need for basic and applied research in support of leveraging Government owned and managed cloud based software factories enabling and promoting the use of DevSecOps to increase the development, testing, accreditation, and Authority To Operate approval of modern software applications. DevSecOps is the union of people, process, and products to enable continuous delivery of value to end users including cybersecurity accreditation. Current software development processes & tools in use by DEVCOM-AC require far too much manual human involvement which adds cost, time, and risk to the process of rapidly developing, deploying, and maintaining quality software. Under the current cybersecurity and fiscal austerity landscapes, usage of DevSecOps concepts has become prohibitive for organizations to manage locally. Basic & applied research is required to determine the best GOTS, open source, and COTS tools specific to the application domain that would benefit the most from its use as well as developing best practices for implementation and widespread usage in an organic Government software development environment with additional classification, safety, cybersecurity restrictions currently not experienced by most organization implementing DevSecOps today. Government cloud based software factories enabling DevSecOps will allow organic developers of modern technology the ability to learn, fail, and remediate fast to deliver modern capabilities to the warfighter that have been continuously accredited to minimize the risk of adversarial exploitation that will soon touch all aspects of software development at

  DEVCOM-AC. Leveraging Government cloud software factories & DevSecOps supports the DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Initiative and USD AT&L Better Buying Power.

• 16. SMALL ARMS LETHAL TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government has the need for applied research efforts in the development of future Small Arms Lethal Technologies and capabilities. This shall include novel approaches and solutions to make the individual Warfighter or Platform more lethal against lightly armored, infantry level targets. This includes advanced technologies which will increase probabilities of hit and incapacitation, while decreasing the overall time to engagement. The Government has the need for applied scientific studies and experimentation directed toward increased knowledge of desired metrics with regards to weapon operation and maintenance, weapon signature, ammunition (interior, exterior, and terminal ballistics), fire control (acquiring targets, determining range, marking/tracking), and human factors / maneuverability. The research technologies should address the battlefield for today’s mission as well as mission requirements far into the future.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are unique technologies that address:

  a. Training, Aides, Devices, Simulators, and Simulations (TADSS)

  b. Ergonomics and Human-Systems Interface

  c. Increased Maneuverability

  d. Breaching

  e. Weapon System Power

  f. Networked Weapon Systems

  g. Remote and Externally Powered Weapon Systems

  h. Advanced Weapon and Battlefield Sensors

  i. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Algorithmic Computation

  j. Aim Augmentation

  k. Counter UAS/UGS

  l. Weapon System Controllability

  m. Advanced Weapon System Operation Technologies

  n. Barrel Technologies

  o. Weapon System Signature Reduction

  p. Subterranean and Dense Urban Environments

  q. Interior Ballistics

  r. Exterior Ballistics and Guidance, Navigation and Control

  s. Terminal Ballistics

  t. Counter Defilade

  u. Alternate Incapacitation Mechanisms

• 17. DIGITAL ENGINEERING

  The Government is interested in research relative to Digital Engineering technologies, specifically technologies that support the development, management, and use of the Digital Thread. The Digital Thread is the product’s data and their relationships captured as links or connections over the course of the product’s lifecycle. Product data includes CAD, software, requirements, architecture, documents, engineering analysis, and production data. The ability to integrate product data across various engineering disciplines enables the generation of the Digital Thread, a driving factor for successful implementation of Digital Engineering, which is a major thrust area for the U.S. Army and DoD. Technologies that facilitate the integration of data and models across the product life-cycle are of interest.

  The Government seeks to advance the state-of-the-art and/or increase knowledge in how disparate engineering models and data can be "integrated" or linked together regardless of any specific software tool the models and data are created or stored in. Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with semantic integrations across different domain-specific modeling languages, across various levels of model fidelity and multiple levels of abstraction. Other technologies of interest include tool-agnostic Data Exchange Standards, Linked-Data, Ontologies, Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC), Application Programming Interfaces (API’s), and Extract-Transform-Load technologies.

• 18. TESTING METHODOLOGY

  The Government has the need for research efforts addressing destructive and non-destructive testing technology. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art for performing natural and induced environmental testing of explosive and inert armaments, munitions, and fire control devices at the system and component levels, and developing and implementing new non- destructive evaluation techniques for product evaluation (including, but not limited to: ultrasonic, Eddy current, Radiography, Mag particle, Penetrant, thermography, acoustic emission); dimensional analysis; joining technology; and additive manufacturing.

  The Government has the need for research efforts addressing advanced capabilities associated with armament system ballistic test and evaluation (T&E). These efforts shall address the complete infrastructure associated with a fully functional state-of-the-art ballistic test facility. Focus shall be on improving T&E efficiency by reducing cycle time, increasing the reliability of data capture, minimizing environmental impact, incorporating state-of-the-art instrumentation and technique and integrating virtual participation while maintaining the standards required by Government regulation and licensing permits. Introduction of novel T&E equipment and methodology is encouraged.

  The Government also has the need for research into physical inspection in support of non- destructive testing. The efforts shall address new developments in programmable inspection equipment (CMM, laser scanners, Romer Arms, and hand/held portable devices) which allow for increasingly efficient inspections with high levels of accuracy. Additionally, advancements in this area will be considered for use in expedited resolution of malfunction investigations as well as reverse engineering applications.

  Recognizing that certain work activities need to continue even in light of a pandemic, the Government would like to explore ideas or industry and/or academia experiences with virtual monitoring, and lab sharing. Most of the software testing is conducted with a computer, tablet, or electronic equipment (oscillation scope, power supply, etc.). Most equipment has an output port to a screen, which means that whatever is on the screen can be broadcast with conference/chat software. Video recording/streaming can also be utilized to stream the test events. Independent verification & validation subject matter experts should be able to monitor the screen remotely instead of witnessing the software testing physically. In light of the current health concerns which calls for social distancing and remote work activity, the need for office space is lessoned. If this strategy can be made effective and efficient it can be continued even after the current crisis has subsided. We must also recognize that testing requires a person to operate the equipment even during a pandemic. How do we design a safe space for a single person or necessary team to operate under such conditions as well?

  The Government has the need for efforts addressing automated SW testing technology especially within Agile SW development environments. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art for planning and executing automated SW testing and developing/implementing new SW automation techniques (ex. AI) for verification and validation of Armament and IT SW. Strategies must explore and/or identify automated tools that can aid in code reviews/analysis, white, grey and black box test activities. The automatic test equipment and deployment strategy must identify skill levels and training requirements for usage to include cost and license requirements.

• 19. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  The Government has a need for efforts in research and development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) software and systems. This shall include research and development in algorithms and AI models, resiliency of deep learning algorithms, and mitigation to attacks against AI. Key additional aspects include research on identification of poisoned data sets and input manipulation impacts, and identification of critical features. Current AI models have shown weakness to specialized adversarial attacks, which lead to invalid and detrimental results for the user.

  The Government is also interested in research that address the ability to understand and explain an AI model for adherence to trust, ethical, and safe utilization. This should include an understanding of why an AI model generates specific outputs and the confidence level in understanding that reason. Many AI models do not have the ability to provide enough “understanding" for a user or evaluator to understand how a specific decision was reached.

  The Government has a need for research to address the development of certification of data sets for Artificial Intelligence training, validation, and testing. Areas of interest include technologies and approaches that address, but are not limited to, certifying data sets are complete and competent for a given program and developing the means to ensure that the test and evaluation of an AI enabled system has satisfactory coverage of expected stimuli and potential outcomes to ensure the fielding of safe, suitable, and supportable materiel. Applications may include image recognition, decision making, prioritization, and resource management.

  The Government is also interested research into alternative software quality models for use with software systems that incorporate or rely on Artificial Intelligence or machine learning solutions to achieve system functions and capabilities. This shall include research into algorithm and AI model development, resiliency of deep learning algorithms, and mitigation to attacks against AI. Models shall utilize metrics for machine learning solutions in lieu of traditional software traceability. Such models shall ensure the requirements are satisfied by expected functionality to predefined levels and present a comprehensive list of all potential failure outcomes should the system behave in an unexpected way. As a result of the research software developers would have a path for certifying the quality of a software system employing various levels of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning without being hindered by the lack of traceability. The Government is also interested in a new acceptance standard for an AI based system that permits software to be evaluated without concrete traceability from requirement, through the source code to the function.

• 20. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

  The purpose of this area is to identify user requirements and operational deficiencies in a variety of operational areas that are amenable to solution through application and exploitation of the existing technology base. The intent is, to the greatest extent possible, to leverage existing technologies and where possible provide for early application and entry of these technologies in to the field. Concomitant with this need is the requirement to actually solve identified problems and deficiencies. These solutions will often take the form of complex, multi-disciplinary and multi- agency collaborations, to include Government, industry and academe. However, due to the complex nature of these collaborations, it will be necessary to have single, or very limited, spans of control, coordinating these efforts to optimize the resources spent and return to the Government on investment, yet still efficiently and effectively meeting the needs of the end user.

  To most effectively meet this evolving mission area, it will be necessary to assess, evaluate, and exploit existing resources and capabilities, focusing on integrating in innovative and unconventional ways existing and evolving technologies, but also being able to identify and implement research plans to fill gaps in existing tech base capabilities and resources.

  However, where it is not practical or desirable to use existing tech base resources, accelerated efforts building on already existing programs will be employed. Particular emphasis will be applied to the various and diverse array of technologies and programs extant within a variety of environments, including but not limited to DOD and other Governmental agencies. While the focus is on long range, high risk, high-payoff programs there are nonetheless numerous opportunities for early transition of programs towards focused requirements. Effort will be made to identify both candidate technologies and programs to which this paradigm will apply. Failing this, however, focused research efforts to fulfill specific needs and bridge identified gaps in the tech base, will be implemented. Ultimately, final efforts will consist of a combination of acquisition, advanced development and basic research, all focused on achieving an end capability to fulfill a defined deficiency.

  Scientific and Technical Areas of Interest:

  Assessment of the needs of the various user communities has shown value in providing support for technology identification and program management and integration functions in a variety of areas. These areas include the following:

  20.1 Research proposals for advanced and innovative technology review

  This would include maintaining an understanding and innovative utilization capability of advanced technologies. Efforts might consist of supporting and coordinating meetings with other Government agencies, contractors, and educational institutions, as well as any other source of information or technology deemed useful. These meetings will provide a primary source of information concerning both technologies and requirements.

  20.2 Research proposals for technology utilization support

  This would include the process of identifying and analysis of opportunities for Government program managers, as well as evaluating transition potential for existing and new technologies. Efforts would include gathering and correlation of data on a wide array of technologies, as well as assisting in assembly and evaluation of requirements from all users. Other efforts might include obtaining various technologies, through whatever means appear appropriate, and assess and evaluate their utility. This will be done through a variety of means including purchase, custom-design, development, and integration of existing systems. Evaluation will be under a variety of conditions including operational and laboratory.

  20.3 Research proposals for the prototyping, manufacturing, assessment and delivery of systems for use by the Government

  Efforts would focus on use of various technologies transitioned from other arenas. Efforts may include location and identification, analysis and assessment, assembly of multi- disciplinary teams and management of integrated efforts to achieve an end capability in as optimal manner as possible.

  20.4 Research proposals to evaluate operational environments and requirements Efforts would focus on supporting the evaluation of operational environments for determination of technology transition and support opportunities. These might include observation, participation, and evaluation and analysis of operational situations, primarily involving training scenarios, but potentially involving actual operational missions. Mission areas may include military, Federal Agency, and civilian missions as appropriate and required.

  20.5 Research proposals to develop and implement processes for rapid response and prototyping needs of critical, high priority missions

  Focus would be on developing a capability to meet rapid response to prototyping requirements as well as assist in the methodology implementation of a wide array of users and mission oriented agencies. This will include evaluation of existing capabilities, development of a method of scheduling and coordination of work, support of design conception and implementation, managing of the manufacturing process, evaluation final product and iterative design changes as required to meet user needs.

  20.6 Research proposal focused for the integration and implementation of multi- disciplinary, multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional integrated efforts to meet complex program needs

  This would include the analysis and identification of key problems and solution approaches, the creation of integrated program implementation and problem solution plans, and the overall management of resources, assets, and creation of programs to meet these needs. This may include a combination of in-house assets and resources, subcontracting to various industrial and academic centers, and coordination and collaboration of and with various Government agencies and organizations. The efforts will consist of overall analysis, management and integration of highly complex and diverse resources to meet the needs of the end user. This process may culminate in products ranging from prototypes of materiel solutions through complete delivery and IOC to analysis and recommendations of doctrinal or procedural changes.

• 21. NETWORKED LETHALITY

  21.1 Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (AI/ML)

  Armaments Center is seeking AI/ML algorithms to continuously analyze the data in the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE), display ongoing trends and predict where future events may occur. These AI/ML algorithms can be further extended for Course of Action (COA) recommendation based on the output of the aforementioned trend analysis.

  AI/ML algorithms should take into the following data attributes at a minimum in the analysis of trends and COA recommendations: account for temporal and geospatial tagged data, confidence level of data, and source of data.

  21.2 Intelligent Networking

  The Armaments Center is seeking a method to manage data transmission over a Disconnected, Intermittent, and Low Bandwidth (DIL) network. In a tactical environment, sometimes network connectivity can be extremely limited and, at times, intermittent. In these situations, prioritizing the data going over the network becomes extremely important.

  A solution that notifies the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) operator of the network characteristics/changes and impact on data transmission is desired. The solution should allow the CPCE administrator to determine which prioritized data to transmit for a given scenario, or if certain CPCE front end capabilities should be suspended.

  21.3 Cloud Computing

  The Armaments Center is seeking solutions to architect the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) to operate in a cloud environment, to include the Amazon’s Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure clouds. This effort would take a look at leveraging some of the native cloud services when CPCE is deployed in a Cloud environment. We would look to leverage native Cloud services such as Azure Kubernetes Services, Azure Active Directory, Azure SQL Database, Azure Container Registry, and Azure Key Vault (or equivalent AWS or other Cloud services).

  21.4 Containerization

  The Armaments Center is looking for ways to reduce the Size, Weight, Power, and Cost (SWaP-C) characteristics of the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) through the utilization of containers. Additionally, containers will increase performance while minimizing resource utilization. The resulting solution will demonstrate the CPCE software and services running in containers, while identifying the SWaP-C savings.

• 22. WEAPONS SYSTEMS

  The Government is interested in research and development of small, medium, large caliber, non- lethal and directed energy weapon systems and its subsystems. These weapon systems include artillery, mounted mortars, infantry/soldier-borne armaments, combat vehicle mounted armaments, directed energy weapons, electro-magnetic weapon system, force protection weapon system, counter explosive hazard armaments, air defense armaments, and aircraft weapons systems; for both lethal and non-lethal applications.

  These include hand guns, rifles, carbines, machine guns, chain guns, crew served weapons, grenade launchers, multi-barrel Gatling guns, remote/robotic weapons systems and gun pods, mounted mortars, cannon caliber indirect fire systems (e.g. towed artillery and self-propelled artillery), electro-magnetic launch systems, non-lethal weapons/devices, and directed energy weapon systems (e.g. High Power Microwave, Radio Frequency weapons, laser weapons, high voltage/electrostatic discharge weapons) to damage/destroy materiel targets.

  Weapon systems components or subsystems include: cradles, gun mounts, gimbals, gun pods, manned/unmanned turrets, bi-pods, tri-pods, recoil mechanisms, elevation and traverse systems, equilibrators, suppressors, mounting rails, upper carriages, lower carriages, cabs, gun drives, electronic control systems, ammunition handling and loading systems, laser ignition systems, HPM/Radio Frequency (RF) sources, beam control, antennas, pulse power components, power supplies, operator station and controls, fire control integration, and supporting hydraulic, electric, structural, and protective subsystems.

• 23. ADVANCED MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government is in need of research to develop advanced at platform automated maintenance systems that can support the Government's mission to protect the nation and / or warfighter from any potential threats with maintaining operational armament systems. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Visual and Audio Interfaces

  b. Non-intrusive sensors

  c. Secure Wireless Communications

  d. Real-time Machine Learning Sensor Data Analytics

  e. Artificial Intelligence Fault Resolution Algorithms

  f. Secure distributed data collection

• 24. AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS (ATS) TECHNOLOGY

  The Government is in need of research to develop advanced automated test systems and sub- systems that can support maintaining readiness and availability of DoD platforms and achieve the goals of the National Defense Strategy. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Electrical Optical test

  b. Radio Frequency test

  c. Augmented reality in automated test

  d. Parallel Test

  e. Cybersecurity

  f. Mechanical/Electrical Sensors

  g. Prognostics Data Collection Technology

• 25. ADVANCED MUNITION PAYLOADS

  As future engagements shift, a focus of smart munitions that include advanced payloads and deployed sensor packages will be necessary. The Government has a need for multi-unit collaboration among deployed assets while utilizing artificial intelligence during autonomous mission engagements. In order to prosecute missions, the USG has an interest in the following, but not limited to, topics:

  a. Advanced Target Recognition

  b. Vision Based Navigation for Unmanned Aerial and Terrestrial based Systems (UAS and UGV)

  c. Obstacle Avoidance

  d. Mission Prioritization

  e. Collaborative Engagement.

• 26. OPERATIONS RESEARCH SYSTEM ANALYSIS (ORSA) MODELING & SIMULATION TOOLS

  The Government is interested in enhancements and state of the art developments in Operations Research System Analysis (ORSA) and Modeling and Simulation (M&S) frameworks, models, methods, analysis and toolsets in support of weapon system evaluations in a Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) context.

  Item Level including sub-system model characterization (source code or black box executable) with an emphasis on novel warhead technology methodology and assessments, enhancements to existing M&S framework including high fidelity threat system modeling, and improvement to visualizations of simulation outputs.

  Operational Level including force on force combat simulations and visualizations, stand-alone or federated over High Level Architecture (HLA) / Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) protocols providing battlefield assessments of current and future weapon system technologies.

  Applications of methods, models and tools supporting a live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) modeling paradigm, incorporating of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning techniques and algorithms into combat models including sensor / shooter pairings and decision making, agent behaviors, and advanced targeting techniques.

• 27. JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE ARMAMENTS AND AMMUNITION (JPEO A&A) ITEM RESEARCH

  The Armaments Center intends that this BAA be used as a research tool for efforts in support of the Joint Program Executive Office Armaments and Ammunition (JPEO A&A) and the general items under their control. Note 1 below outlines the JPEO A&A organization. Note 2 lists the general items of interest, and associated technologies with a summary of short, mid, and long term objectives. Note 3 provides the specific needs of the Assured Precision Munitions branch of the JPEO A&A.

  Note 1: The JPEO A&A is organized under the following Program Management (PM) offices:

  • Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems (CAS)

  • Project Manager Close Combat Systems (CCS)

  • Project Manager Maneuver Ammunition Systems (MAS)

  • Project Lead Joint Services

  • OEDCA- Executive Director Conventional Ammunition

  ➢ Single Manager for Conventional Ammo (SMCA)

  Note 2: General items of interest and associated technologies of interest for R&D efforts, some with short through long term objectives:

  1.Flares & Signals

  a. Tunable countermeasures (multi-purpose)

  b. Fully tunable effects (user selectable)

  2.Tank Ammo

  a. Depleted Uranium (DU) alternates

  b. Advanced Kinetic Energy (KE) and Advanced Multi-Purpose (AMP) technology

  c. Guided extended range for advanced targets

  3.Small Caliber

  a. Extended range guided with user tunable effects

  b. “Trace” capability in smart sight on the weapon vs. on the round

  c. “Ammo on demand” for User to “produce” the ammo as needed

  4.Artillery & Mortars

  a. Advancing the capabilities of precision cannon munitions

  b. Alternative Navigation (Alt-Nav) correction algorithms

  c. Ultra-Long range and Hyper-Velocity artillery

  d. Autonomous Networked Weapons

  5.Demolition

  a. Non-kinetic neutralization of explosives from standoff

  6.Bomb Technology

  7.Medium Caliber

  a. Collaborative/swarming effects

  b. “Ammo on Demand” logistics improvements

  8.Non-Lethal Technology

  9.Counter Explosive Hazard (CEH)

  a. Increased speed, autonomous operations and standoff for detection marking; associated lower cost technologies

  b. Detection and non-kinetic neutralization of explosives from standoff

  10.Grenade Technology

  Note 3: Assured Precision Weapons and Munitions PNT (Position Navigation and Timing) and NAVWAR Technology needs:

  1.Alternative sources of Position, Navigation, and/or Timing other than GPS for weapons and munitions (RF and non RF based)

  2.Assured Position Navigation and Timing (GPS and non GPS solutions) threat protection solutions

  3.PNT Software Defined Solutions for weapons and munitions

  4.Weapons and Munitions NAVWAR technologies supporting penetrating, disrupting, and disintegrating A2/AD environments and enabling situational awareness

  5.M&S tools facilitating NAVWAR analysis of weapons and munitions with possible integration into command and control constructs enabling optimal target and weapon/munition pairing in NAVWAR challenged environments

• 28. TECHNOLOGY EXPLOITATION

  The Government is interested in basic and applied research that involves the adaptation of advanced and innovative technology, processes and procedures from the private sector for military applications. Additionally, research that has transition potential of adapting existing military technology for unique warfighter needs are encouraged. Further, prototyping efforts, including state-of-the-art Additive Manufacturing, that assess manufacturing technologies and R&D systems at Government facilities are wanted. Finally, efforts that provide rapid response technologies to fulfill needs in critical, high priority missions that can maintain the quality and reliability of the systems are needed. This may also include coordinated efforts that evaluate operational environments and requirements in relation to a proposed technology.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

Government Validation & Technical Credibility
Being selected by DEVCOM Armaments Center signals that your technology aligns with Army modernization priorities—significantly strengthening credibility with primes, integrators, and investors.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation
Awards allow companies to advance high-risk, high-impact technologies with non-dilutive capital, increasing enterprise valuation and accelerating commercialization.

Access to Army Technical Stakeholders
Awardees collaborate with government engineers, program offices, and test facilities—creating opportunities for future transition paths, follow-on funding, and insertion into Army programs of record.

Increased Visibility & Notoriety
Participation in Army-funded R&D often enhances visibility with Congress, DoD stakeholders, and defense industry partners.

Strengthened Exit / Acquisition Potential
Demonstrating government-backed R&D progress increases the likelihood of strategic partnerships or acquisition by major defense primes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• BAA Open Period: Open until Mar 17, 2026.

• White Papers: May be submitted any time during the open period.

• Evaluation: Approximately 3 weeks after submission.

• Proposal Requests: Only if the white paper is rated Promising, though any offeror may voluntarily submit a full proposal.

• Awards: Rolling, contingent on available funding; multi-month contracting timelines should be expected.

Because the BAA is continuously open, funding timing varies but generally follows white paper evaluation → proposal submission → negotiation → award.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Armaments Center, located at Picatinny Arsenal, under federal R&D authority including FAR 6.102(d)(2), 10 U.S.C. 2371/2358 (Other Transactions), and applicable DoD research statutes.

Who is eligible to apply?

All responsible sources may apply, including:

• Traditional and nontraditional defense contractors

• Small and large businesses

• Universities and research institutions

• Nonprofits

The BAA encourages participation from HBCUs and Minority Institutions.

SAM.gov registration is required prior to award. White papers and proposals must be submitted via email to the contracting POCs.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Highly competitive proposals will:

• Directly address one of the 28 detailed technology areas (e.g., advanced materials, energetics, AI/ML, fire control, autonomous munitions, logistics, digital engineering).

• Provide innovative, non-incremental research concepts

• Demonstrate feasibility, technical merit, and Army relevance

• Show strong organizational capability, facilities, and past performance

• Include clear pathways to future Army integration

Funded efforts typically target high-impact, dual-use, defense-relevant technologies aligned to Army modernization priorities such as long-range precision fires, soldier lethality, next-generation combat systems, and advanced energetics.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• Some OT awards may require cost share (e.g., 50/50 for research TIAs).

• Classified submissions require prior approval and special handling.

• Possession of a SECRET facility clearance is recommended for potential future phases (not needed to get started).

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Typical preparation timelines:

• White Paper: 2–6 weeks depending on complexity.

• Full Proposal (if requested): 6–12+ weeks for technical, cost, and contractual documentation.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available to submit a white paper for a flat fee of $4,000.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most scout card projects requiring 10-12 hours of work.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Drone Dominance Program (DDP) – One-Way Attack (OWA) sUAS Procurement

Executive Summary:

The Department of War’s Drone Dominance Program (DDP) will award up to $1 billion in fixed-price orders for companies that can design and manufacture low-cost, NDAA-compliant, One-Way-Attack sUAS at scale. Up to 25 vendors will be invited to Gauntlet I, with winners receiving production orders of at least 1,000 units. The RFS is expected December 17, 2025, and Gauntlet I begins February 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Awards are fixed-price production orders—no development funding, no cost reimbursement, and no progress payments. Vendors are paid only for accepted units delivered. Planned procurement (page 1 table):

• 30,000 units in Phase I ($150M total)

• 60,000 units in Phase II ($300M total)

• 100,000 units in Phase III ($300M total)

• 150,000 units in Phase IV ($345M total)

Up to 12 vendors in Phase I will receive orders, with minimum buys of 1,000 units per vendor. Larger orders go to top performers.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding is strictly for production and delivery of compliant, mission-ready low-cost, NDAA-compliant, One-Way-Attack sUAS.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the production revenue, awardees stand to gain substantial strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Competitive Differentiation
Being selected through Gauntlet scoring—publicly posted via leaderboard—serves as strong validation of performance, reliability, and manufacturing scale. This credibility improves trust with primes, integrators, and future government buyers.

Accelerated Market Visibility
Winners enter widely publicized Gauntlet announcements and procurement cycles. The DoW expects increasing visibility across phases as the program scales toward 200,000+ drones purchased by 2027.

Commercial & Dual-Use Positioning
A proven low-cost, high-reliability sUAS platform creates runway for commercial security, inspection, and tactical robotics markets.

Stronger Exit and Investment Potential
Demonstrating performance at scale via nondilutive production orders increases valuation, derisks manufacturing capability, and strengthens attractiveness for acquisition by defense primes, autonomy companies, and major drone manufacturers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• RFS Release: ~December 17, 2025

• Selections Notified: Week of January 26, 2026

• Gauntlet I: Begins February 17, 2026 (est.)

• Deliveries: Two tranches each phase, due 2.5 and 4.5 months after Gauntlet

Production payments occur upon delivery and acceptance of units.

Where does this funding come from?

The Department of War will issue orders using 10 U.S.C. 4022 Other Transaction Authority, executed through the S2MARTS OTA consortium. The program intends to place up to $1B in fixed-price orders over four phases.

Who is eligible to apply?

Per the program FAQ and RFI:

• Eligible: Companies from the United States and allied Five Eyes nations

• Strong Preference: U.S. companies manufacturing in the U.S. with American-made components and materials

• Systems must be NDAA-compliant (no covered foreign components).

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Winners will be companies that can deliver:

• Low-cost, attritable sUAS that meet OWA mission requirements

• 10 km strike range (open terrain) & 1 km (urban) with 2kg payload

• High reliability and ease of use, with only ~2 hours of operator training needed

• NDAA-compliant supply chains

• Production scaling capability into tens of thousands of units per phase

• Fast delivery under tight 2.5–4.5 month timelines

• Supply-chain secure manufacturing beyond minimum NDAA rules

Systems must withstand increasingly complex Counter-UAS environments in later phases.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes:

• No progress payments; no cost reimbursement—vendors carry all development risk

• No classified submissions

• NDAA compliance required

• Foreign components from covered countries are prohibited

• All submissions must be made through the NSTXL standardized form

• Vendors must meet requirements of 10 USC 4022(d)

• Vendors are limited to fixed-price production only—no R&D funding

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive proposal will likely take 50-100 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee + success fee (Pricing available upon request).

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most scout card projects requiring 10-12 hours of work.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See RFI on Sam.Gov

Army Medical Operational Capabilities for 2040 BAA

Executive Summary:

The MED CDID Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) invites industry and other performers to propose innovative medical concepts and technologies that support tactical Army medical units in the 2040 Future Operational Environment. The program is open through December 31, 2030, using a multi-step process: submission of a Vulcan Scout Card, followed—if selected for further interest—by a white paper and then a full technical and cost proposal. Companies should plan their internal timelines to first shape a high-impact Scout Card aligned to MED CDID’s three imperatives: clearing the battlefield, maximizing return to duty, and overcoming contested logistics.

How much funding would I receive?

The MED CDID BAA does not specify individual award ceilings or a total program funding limit. Instead, offerors must propose a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) total cost (including any fee) that is consistent with the scope of work, period of performance, and any dollar ranges specified in the announcement or follow-on calls. Common costs range from $500K to $5M.

What could I use the funding for?

Proposals should address at least one problem associated with the following aspects of the future operational environment (FOE):

a. Enemy action (through fires, maneuver, electronic warfare, etc.) will inhibit evacuation and medical resupply operations. Slow, reduced, or ineffective evacuation or medical resupply delays the Soldier’s treatment at the proper medical treatment facility. When evacuation slows, the consumption of medical treatment items increases, thus compounding the resupply problem. The cumulative effects of inadequate evacuation and medical resupply will reduce the return to duty rate and increase the number of preventable deaths.

b. The proliferation of drones, sensors, and other advanced technologies has made the modern battlefield more transparent than ever before. This transparency, coupled with long range precision and massed fires, requires Army forces to be distributed across a wider area and to displace frequently. Enemy precision and massed fires will result in more frequent mass casualty incidents, which will likely occur in support areas rather than near the front lines. Future medical forces must therefore be highly mobile to conduct survivability moves, to support widely distributed units, and to respond quickly to the point of need with both medical personnel and supplies (Class VIII).

c. The future battlefield will likely have a broad range of man-made and naturally occurring chemical and biological threats. These threats may be varied and difficult to detect and prevent, making early warning systems crucial. Toxic industrial chemicals and toxic industrial materials in urban areas pose additional threats. Directed energy and other new weapons may cause novel wound patterns that require new training and treatments.

d. When operating in urban areas, challenges include moving through routes blocked by rubble, craters, and other obstacles. Medical units must plan to extract patients from collapsed buildings, interaction with civil medical infrastructure, and potentially large numbers of injured civilians and enemy prisoners.

e. An increasingly transparent and lethal battlefield with chem-bio threats and new weapons systems will create continuous physiological and psychological stressors. These stressors will lead to a decline in the cognitive, physical, and emotional aspects of Soldier performance, and thus a decline in unit combat effectiveness. Army medical units must expand capacity to build and restore individual resiliency, to reduce disease non-battle injury (DNBI) losses, and increase return to duty (RTD).

AREAS OF INTEREST

The Army is looking for solutions in the following categories. Please note that these categories are not comprehensive, but rather to provide context. Categories may be created or removed as time progresses:

• Clear the Battlefield

  Future wars will produce dramatically higher casualty numbers that will stress patient evacuation systems and restrict freedom of maneuver. Minimizing preventable death requires a multi-modal medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) system with advanced enroute care from the point of injury (POI) to the appropriate medical treatment facility at echelon. This MEDEVAC system must be mobile, survivable, and sustainable. It will leverage manned as well as autonomous and semi-autonomous platforms, integrate with casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) capabilities, and be synchronized to maximize efficiency.

  a. Autonomous / semi-autonomous platforms. Manned evacuation platforms areexpected to be insufficient for future combat operations with peer adversaries or in non-permissive environments. The Army's Robotics and Autonomous System (RAS) Strategy leverages systems to increase reach, capacity, and protection in high-risk areas. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) can be staged with support units to provide delivery of critical medical supplies when evacuation is not possible (i.e., prolonged care). A versatile unmanned system (UMS) with casualty evacuation capability would serve as a valuable tool for medical missions.

  b. CASEVAC. CASEVAC complements MEDEVAC by providing additional evacuation capacity when the number of casualties (workload) or mandated reaction time exceeds the capabilities or capacity of MEDEVAC assets. Casualty evacuation is often the first step in moving patients from the point of injury to the appropriate medical facility. Self-aid and buddy-aid are critical. Effective operational planning and a C2 system that integrates non-standard platforms maximizes the commander’s freedom of action and ensures efficient use of evacuation assets. Augmentation of medical personnel and equipment onboard dedicated CASEVAC platforms will increase survivability.

  c. Multimodal evacuation. Multimodal evacuation capabilities meet FOE challenges by using multiple modes of transportation (e.g. boats, buses, trains, etc.) to fulfill evacuation capability and capacity shortfalls. Future evacuation capabilities involve the seamless integration of land, air, and maritime (sea and river) transportation to ensure an efficient and effective evacuation system. Leveraging different modes of transportation optimizes mobility and flexibility, enhances response capabilities, and enables swift evacuation in a variety of operational environments.
  
  d. Prolonged Care. The FOE may not allow evacuation of patients at a time and place of our choosing, due to unavailability of assets or enemy action. Prolonged care is necessary to provide patient care for extended periods when evacuation is not available. Currently, the Prolonged Care Augmentation Detachment (PCAD) is designed to operate forward of definitive care capabilities in support of medical units, such as Battalion Aid Stations (BAS), medical companies, and Forward Resuscitation and Surgical Detachments (FRSD) to manage patients in a prolonged care setting. Further study is needed to determine if this capability can be significantly improved.

  e. Integrated and synchronized C2 of patient movement capabilities. C2 systems facilitate seamless communication and information sharing among healthcare providers, commanders, evacuation elements, and other stakeholders involved in patient movement. These systems enable real-time coordination, synchronization, and decision-making, ensuring efficient and effective allocation of resources for patient movement. An integrated C2 system incorporates AI-enabled real-time data analysis, predictive modeling, and adaptive learning to enable the following: mission requests management, treatment and evacuation capability tracking and two-way communication, intelligent tasking (dispatching), data management, and telemedicine and telehealth technologies to facilitate remote consultations, triage, and medical guidance during patient movement. These solutions enable evacuation mission and system management and enable healthcare providers to remotely assess and manage patients. They also allow optimization of medical personnel, equipment, supplies, and evacuation resources based on patient needs, urgency, and available capacity.

• Maximizing Return to Duty (RTD)

  Maximizing RTD allows for experienced Soldiers to return to the fight as quickly as possible after becoming wounded, injured, or ill. It includes prevention—minimizing disease and nonbattle injury (DNBI).

  a. Holistic resiliency. Commanders in conjunction with their medical staff will maximize preparedness through a holistic approach prior to and during deployment. This will serve to help minimize DNBI and battle injuries (BI). A holistic approach includes cognitive, physical, and emotional well-being, emphasizing proper nutrition, sleep, and social and environmental factors to navigate the rigors of combat operations. Advances in areas such as body-worn sensors, stress inoculation, and medical cognitive enhancements will further increase Soldiers’ capabilities in austere environments while decreasing the likelihood of becoming a casualty. Advanced biomedical engineering can create vaccines and individualized treatments to address emerging health threats before deployment to preserve the force.

  b. Theater Convalescence. In the theater of operations, convalescence capability is essential to maximizing RTD rates. Soldiers who are unlikely to RTD within the prescribed period (theater evacuation policy) will be evacuated out of theater with the first suitable transportation asset. Establishing in-theater convalescence serves to simultaneously decrease the logistical burden on theater transportation assets while decreasing the burden on replacement operations. Rehabilitation support encompasses cognitive and emotional healing as well as physical recovery (e.g., physical therapy with combat and operational stress control). Advanced prosthetics, exoskeletons, and robotic rehabilitation systems can assist Soldiers in regaining mobility and functionality after injury.

  c. Operational Public Health (OPH). OPH is a critical enabler for commanders to maintain maximum strength on the battlefield. OPH minimizes casualties through full spectrum surveillance, monitoring, and testing activities against environmental, biological, and chemical threats. Equipped and trained field sanitation and CBRN elements will establish tailored active and passive protection measures, resulting in more survivable formations. Army medical formations must integrate manned and unmanned air and surface systems to improve detection, diagnostics, and treatment. These formations must share information with all partners through a single, data-centric C2 system empowering both timely operational decisions and timely medical responses.

  d. Healthcare Training and Education. Medical education and training must align with combat demands. This comprehensive approach will encompass all medical specialties, using advanced training methodologies like virtual reality, haptic feedback systems, and AI-driven simulations to develop and maintain skills. These technologies will provide realistic and repeatable opportunities for personnel to practice high-stress and complex scenarios, like trauma triage or prolonged care.

  e. Advanced Diagnostics. In a combat environment, where split-second decisions can mean the difference between life and death, the benefits of advanced diagnostics are immeasurable. By incorporating cutting-edge technologies such as precision medicine, nanomedicine, robotics, telemedicine, and gene editing technology, Soldiers can experience optimized health and improved combat performance. Additionally, advanced diagnostics enable early detection of internal injuries, such as internal bleeding or organ damage, which may not be immediately evident. Swift identification of these hidden injuries allows medical personnel to intervene promptly and prevent further harm. Moreover, advanced diagnostics aid in identifying infectious diseases or exposure to hazardous agents (e.g., CBRN), thereby preventing outbreaks. Ultimately, the integration of advanced diagnostics in combat empowers medical teams to deliver timely and accurate care, leading to improved outcomes for wounded, injured, or ill Soldiers and enhanced operational efficiency.
  
  f. Advanced Therapeutic Technology (ATT). ATT will play a critical role in supporting commanders and Army Medicine. In austere and contested environments, ATT will enhance Army Medicine's ability to rapidly triage and assess injuries, leveraging portable diagnostic devices and advanced imaging systems to determine the severity of injuries and provide timely treatment. The ability of ATT to track Soldiers' exposure to hazardous conditions, such as chemical agents or extreme temperatures, will also be crucial in protecting personnel from emerging threats.

  g. Advanced Treatment Modalities (ATMs). The integration of ATMs will revolutionize the way combat commanders operate in future operational environments. With the advent of cutting-edge technologies such as robotic surgery and portable diagnostic equipment, commanders will be empowered to make informed decisions that prioritize the health and safety of their troops. ATMs such as bioengineered skin substitutes and negative pressure wound therapy will be particularly critical in managing complex battlefield injuries, promoting faster wound healing, reducing infection risk, and enhancing long-term recovery. The combination of these advanced medical capabilities and technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics, will enable rapid and effective treatment of wounded personnel, reduce the risk of mortality and morbidity, and facilitate their swift return to duty.

• Overcoming Contested Logistics

  Future supply lines will likely be disrupted, congested, and under constant threat. Predicted high casualty rates in future warfare requires Army medical forces to have predictable and reliable delivery of Class VIII at the point of need (PON). This will enable clearing the battlefield and maximizing RTD while facilitating expanded maneuver and survivable formations. In the FOE, the threat will likely target sustainment nodes from the homeland (industrial base) to the operational area, cutting off access to sustainment capabilities and resources. Compounding this problem is the demand to support widely distributed friendly forces.

  a. Advanced Manufacturing. Advanced manufacturing can revolutionize logistics by enabling the production of essential supplies at or near the PON. This includes the production of Class VIII A/B medical supplies through synthetic biology and biomedical manufacturing.

  b. Predictive medical logistics (MEDLOG). This capability uses advanced analysis to predict where and when medical supplies will be needed. It allows for the optimization of Class VIII supplies, which include medical materiel and equipment, across all echelons. By analyzing expected casualty rates and injury mechanisms, predictive MEDLOG enables planning and allocation of resources. Integration with partners and allies will additionally enhance this capability by using standardized equipment, supplies, and data-sharing protocols, ensuring that medical logistics systems work seamlessly across different military forces. At higher echelons, persistent assessment of the supply chain (from rare earth metals and active pharmaceutical ingredients to industrial-based capacity) must be conducted through the lens of risk to mission and risk to force.

  c. Multimodal resupply. Multimodal resupply combines air, land, and maritime transportation with manned and unmanned systems to enhance resupply capabilities and reduce reliance on a single mode of transport. Air transport provides speed and agility for time-sensitive items, while land transport offers flexibility in various terrains. Maritime transport (both sea and river, surface and subsurface) handles larger quantities over longer distances. Manned systems provide adaptability, while unmanned and autonomous systems offer speed, precision, and reduced risk. This multimodal approach optimizes logistics operations, ensures timely supply delivery, and overcomes challenges in contested environments.

  d. Distributed supply nodes. These nodes are strategically positioned throughout the operational area to ensure effective resupply. This approach offers several advantages, including reduced vulnerability to disruptions, resupply redundancy, and enhanced operational coordination. By having multiple supply nodes, military forces can mitigate disruptions in one area by relying on alternative nodes (to include those of partners and allies). Supplies can be sourced from the nearest available node, reducing transportation time and costs, and ensuring critical supplies reach the PON in a timely manner. Additionally, strategically positioned supply nodes enable better coordination and synchronization of logistics activities, optimizing resource distribution, and enhancing overall operational effectiveness while reducing strain on logistics capabilities. Robots and autonomous platforms specifically designed to operate in these supply nodes allow for additional flexibility.

  e. Autonomous and semi-autonomous resupply systems. Autonomous and semi- autonomous resupply systems enhance logistics capabilities by reducing reliance on human intervention in contested logistics. These systems leverage advanced technologies to automate and streamline the resupply process, resulting in increased efficiency and flexibility while reducing risk. In addition, these systems can serve to enhance situational awareness by having their sensors gather data from their surroundings.

  f. Tele-maintenance and remote diagnostics. These capabilities will enable medical logisticians to provide guidance and consultation from afar, minimizing the need for physical transportation of personnel and materiel. Advanced diagnostic tools and predictive maintenance algorithms can identify potential equipment failures before they occur, ensuring the highest levels of readiness.

• Cross-cutting Components

  There are functions that support two or more of the three medical imperatives outlined above.

  a. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. By using AI and ML to analyze vast amounts of data, patterns can be detected, outcomes can be more accurately predicted, and sound recommendations can be quickly developed for commanders. This allows medical personnel at all echelons and across all medical functions to act more quickly and decisively, ultimately reducing preventable deaths.

  b. Human-machine teaming. This teaming involves leveraging the unique strengths of both humans and machines to achieve operational goals. Machines, equipped with AI and machine learning, can process, and analyze vast amounts of data at speeds far beyond human capabilities. This allows for real-time analytics of supply chain needs and predictive modeling for medical supply, evacuation, and treatment. The integration of human capabilities with advanced technological systems represents a transformative shift towards more efficient, responsive, and adaptive medical support on the battlefield.

  c. Scalable, highly mobile multifunctional organizations. The FOE demands that medical units at all echelons be as mobile as the maneuver units they support to keep up with the rapid pace of military operations and to better ensure survivability. Medical organizations that are scalable and multifunctional will allow maneuver commanders increased flexibility in rapidly changing situations. In addition, medical units must decrease their signature (physical, electronic, etc.) to avoid enemy detection.

  d. Interoperability with the Combined Joint Force. Interoperability with partners and allies is crucial for achieving success. It ensures that different medical forces can work together seamlessly, share information, and support each other's operations. This capability enhances mission success by leveraging the strengths and resources of multiple Services and nations, fostering mutual trust and cooperation. Moreover, interoperability helps in responding swiftly to global crises, maintaining regional stability, and deterring potential threats through a unified front. Ultimately, it strengthens collective defense and augments the Army's medical capabilities.

  e. Health Engagement. Health engagement plays a significant role in winning in competition and being prepared for crisis and conflict. Through engagement with international health organizations, foreign militaries, and local healthcare systems, Army medical forces can foster collaboration, build trust, and promote a shared understanding of health security threats and responses. This, in turn, enhances interoperability with partners and allies, allowing for more effective coordination and cooperation in response to health crises and other operational challenges. Health engagement also allows for enhancing situational awareness.

  f. Reach back. Reach back is an essential component for enhancing battlefield capability, capacity, and operational readiness. This approach will use advanced telepresence and telemedicine technologies, along with integrated data systems, to conserve a commander's fighting strength. Reach back improves real-time diagnostics and remote treatment, allowing medical personnel real-time remote access to specialized care. Furthermore, in an environment characterized by contested logistics, reach back can provide a lifeline, using virtual platforms to maintain continuity of care and resource allocation.

  g. Operate in a CBRN environment. The best way to deter enemy CBRN use is to demonstrate that Army forces can effectively operate in a CBRN environment. The ability to rapidly assess threats, evacuate and treat patients, and resupply in contaminated areas is crucial to minimize preventable death and maximize RTD. Additionally, continued development of advanced deployable sensors that can observe current and emerging CBRN threats can help decrease those threats.

  h. Medical Modeling and Simulations. Incorporating medical modeling and simulation in both training and in operational settings is crucial. By using advanced modeling techniques, medical professionals can simulate diverse medical scenarios, thereby optimizing treatment plans, forecast the spread of diseases, and evaluate casualties in complex operational environments. These simulations facilitate the development medical resource allocation plans, identifying potential bottlenecks in the treatment and evacuation process, and enhance preparedness in large-scale conflicts. Furthermore, modeling and simulation allows testing of various prevention and intervention strategies, aiding in the identification of the most efficient approaches to minimize casualties and improve overall outcomes.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, MED CDID funding offers significant strategic advantages for companies operating in defense, medical technology, logistics, AI/ML, and dual-use innovation:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Being selected by the U.S. Army Medical Capability Development Integration Directorate demonstrates strong technical merit and alignment with Army 2040 operational needs. This validation can accelerate engagement with primes, program offices, integrators, and investors who prioritize government-vetted technologies.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
Although the BAA does not explicitly promise publicity, MED CDID-aligned innovations often surface in Army medical modernization discussions, technical exchanges, and defense-sector forums—raising your company’s profile across DoD medical, logistics, and capability development communities.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain direct interaction with MED CDID, Army Futures Command stakeholders, and operational medical units. These touchpoints can open pathways to experimentation events, requirements discussions, field evaluations, and future contracting opportunities with Army, Joint, and SOF medical acquisition organizations.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive DoD funding that advances medical, logistics, or autonomy technologies—combined with Army validation—typically increases a company’s valuation and attractiveness to acquirers in defense, biotech, medtech, autonomy, and advanced manufacturing. Government-backed maturity substantially strengthens both commercial and dual-use exit potential.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Open period: The announcement is open from its posting date through December 31, 2030, as an open-ended BAA.

• Submission cadence: Vulcan Scout Cards may be submitted at any time during the open period, subject to the process in the BAA. The government may also issue separate, focused calls for follow-on white papers at any time while the BAA is active.

• Multi-step process:

  1. Vulcan Scout Card submission.

  2. If of interest, MED CDID may request a white paper and/or

  3. A formal technical and cost proposal.

The BAA does not specify review cycle timing or when funds would be awarded after a proposal is submitted. Actual award timing will depend on when MED CDID issues a request for proposal, internal evaluations, and contracting timelines.

Where does this funding come from?

This opportunity is issued by the U.S. Army Medical Capability Development Integration Directorate (MED CDID), which is responsible for enabling the Army Health System and developing future medical concepts and requirements for the Army and Joint Force

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Based on the BAA’s emphasis, competitive projects are likely to:

• Directly address one or more of the three MED CDID imperatives:

  • Clearing the battlefield (evacuation, prolonged care, integrated patient-movement C2).

  • Maximizing return to duty (resiliency, OPH, advanced diagnostics and treatment, training).

  • Overcoming contested logistics (advanced manufacturing, predictive MEDLOG, multimodal resupply).

• Provide innovative, future-oriented solutions for the 2040 operational environment, not just incremental improvements to current practice.

• Show clear relevance to the described FOE challenges (distributed forces, mass casualties, CBRN threats, urban operations, contested logistics).

• Leverage cross-cutting enablers such as AI/ML, human-machine teaming, interoperability with joint and allied forces, and medical modeling and simulation to materially improve outcomes (reduced preventable deaths, higher RTD rates, more resilient logistics).

In short, teams that tightly map their concept to these problem statements and demonstrate operational impact for Corps-and-below medical units are best aligned with the BAA.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Tactical level focus: The BAA is focused on tactical-level (Army Corps and below) medical units, not broader health systems in isolation.

• Targeted white papers: White papers should address only the specific portion of the BAA the offeror intends to accomplish. Submitting a single white paper that tries to cover the entire scope of the BAA is “most likely” to be rejected.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive scout card under this BAA will likely take 20–30 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available to submit a scout card for a flat fee of $2,500.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most scout card projects requiring 10-12 hours of work.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on Vulcan

DLA Military Unique Sustainment Technology III (MUST-III) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

The Defense Logistics Agency’s MUST-III BAA provides up to $50M over five years for R&D that improves the military’s clothing and equipment manufacturing ecosystem. Companies may apply during the initial 45-day window (through Jan 16, 2026) for IDIQ consideration, or later through rolling White Paper submissions once the BAA reopens.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings, but it does specify:

• Total available program funding: up to $50M over 5 years.

• Awards are issued as cost-type contracts, which commonly support multi-hundred-thousand- to multi-million-dollar R&D projects.

• Each Short-Term Project (STP) is typically 3–24 months.

Historically, DLA ManTech STPs are substantial technical efforts—often sized to fully execute a discrete R&D solution (e.g., digital thread capability, manufacturing prototype, supply chain modeling tool).

What could I use the funding for?

Projects must align with one of the three Technical Areas of Interest:

• Digital as an authoritative source

  Establishing a single, trusted digital version of clothing and individual equipment specifications, manufacturing data, and sourcing details to reduce errors, increase speed, and enable automation throughout the supply chain.

  o This includes transitioning from traditional technical documents to digital data as the primary source of truth, ensuring all design, sourcing, and production information is timely, accurate consistent, accessible, and secure.

  o Emphasis should be placed on integrating model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and digital thread technologies. This transformation should rely on IT architectures that support interoperability, cybersecurity, and protection of intellectual property.

  o Advanced technologies such as augmented reality, AI, and machine learning could be utilized to bridge business and technical workflows, enhancing accuracy and operational efficiency.

  o Establishing secure, “time of need” information sharing capability e.g. Application Program Interfaces to enable distribution of technical data over the product lifecycle.

• Supply chain resilience in clothing and individual equipment

  Developing and demonstrating adaptive manufacturing capabilities and buffer strategies—like material stockpiles or alternate sourcing—that help the industry continue operating during surge requirements, large-scale conflicts, disasters, or disruptions.

  o Research in this area could focus on mapping supply chains, identifying critical bottlenecks, or developing models to simulate and respond to various disruptions. Tools like digital twin simulations of the supply chain and predictive analytics could be utilized to proactively address labor shortages, material delays, and capacity issues.

  o Researchers might also examine how to incorporate surge readiness, excess capacity strategies, and prepositioned material stockpiles to ensure stability in times of crisis.

  o Supplier categorization using digital platforms could support diversified sourcing and highlight alternative production pathways when traditional channels are compromised.

  o Develop capabilities to manufacture for low-volume or “made to measure” items, cost effectively with the very short lead-time needed to meet mission requirements (e.g. training goals).

• Innovation in clothing and individual equipment

  Encouraging research and development in novel materials, garment designs, and production methods (e.g. 3D knitting, advanced wearables, automated sewing) to enhance the performance, comfort, and scalability of military clothing and individual equipment.

  o Efforts should prioritize interfacing and coordinating with the Military Services on the development of cutting-edge textile technologies, next-generation uniform systems. This includes advanced manufacturing techniques. containerized and point-of-need manufacturing capabilities that allow rapid setup and deployment in remote or austere environments.

  o Research to encourage exploration into wearable technologies, self-healing fabrics, and automated production techniques such as 3D knitting and robotics. Digital representations of product lifecycles and materials performance, paired with a workforce trained in AI and digital tools, will ensure that new capabilities are both scalable and resilient.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, companies gain several strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection under DLA’s Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) program is a strong technical endorsement. This validation can accelerate partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors who trust government-vetted innovation.

Visibility & Industry Notoriety
Awardees participate in DLA working groups and may be highlighted in federal program materials—raising national profile within the defense textile and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

Access to DLA Experts & Ecosystem Collaboration
IDIQ awardees join a 5-year Working Group, providing direct collaboration with DLA program managers, CIE stakeholders, and other innovators—unlocking future contracting and transition opportunities.

Stronger Long-Term Valuation & Exit Potential
Advancing technology under nondilutive federal funding de-risks the product roadmap and strengthens valuation in future equity rounds or acquisition discussions—especially with defense, apparel manufacturing, or automation companies.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Initial Deadline:

• Full technical & cost proposals due January 16, 2026 (45 days after Dec 2, 2025 posting).

• These proposals are for IDIQ contract consideration.

After Initial Period:

• The BAA temporarily closes for evaluation.

• It then reopens for rolling White Paper submissions for the remainder of the 5-year period.

Award Timing:

• After evaluation, DLA notifies offerors of selection.

• Task orders (STPs) may or may not be immediately issued to IDIQ holders.

• Additional STPs may be awarded after White Papers → requested proposals → evaluation cycle.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) under the Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Program.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any responsible U.S. source capable of meeting government requirements, including:

• Large businesses

• Small businesses (including WOSB, HUBZone, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB)

• Nonprofits

• Universities / Minority Institutions

• HBCUs

There is no set-aside.
Must meet minimum standards in: financial resources, accounting system adequacy, technical capabilities, past performance, and compliance with FAR Part 9.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants typically include companies with:

• Expertise in digital engineering, textile manufacturing, AI/ML, automation, or supply chain analytics.

• Demonstrated DoD or CIE manufacturing experience (digital data, prototyping, supply chain modeling).

• Capabilities aligned tightly to Technical Areas of Interest.

• Strong past performance and ability to transition solutions into the production environment.

Examples of strong project types:

• Digital twin implementation for apparel manufacturing

• Secure digital technical data environment (authoritative source of truth)

• Surge production capability modeling

• Automated sewing or 3D knitting demonstrations

• Wearable sensor textiles

• AI-enabled supply chain forecasting for CIE items

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key requirements include:

• Cybersecurity compliance (DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171, CMMC).

• No compensation for proposing STPs (including White Papers).

• Subcontracting plans required for large businesses on proposals > $750,000.

• Projects must be executed within U.S. regulations for export controls, IP, and data rights.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a full proposal under this opportunity will likely take 150-200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

ARPA-H BioStabilization Systems (BoSS)

Executive Summary:

The ARPA-H BioStabilization Systems (BoSS) program provides multi-year support for teams developing ambient-temperature cell stabilization and scalable bioprocessing systems. Performer Solution Summaries are due February 19, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

ARPA-H anticipates multiple OT awards, with the expectation that Performer teams will be funded through multi-phase development (up to 48 months). While specific award ceilings aren't stated, ARPA-H OT programs typically support multi-million-dollar development efforts and note that several teams may be funded initially with down-selects in later phases.

What could I use the funding for?

The BioStabilization Systems (BoSS) program aims to transform how live cell-based therapies are stabilized, manufactured, and distributed. At its core, BoSS addresses a foundational bottleneck in the delivery of advanced cell and gene therapies (CGTs): the critical dependence on ultra-cold conditions (-80 to -196˚C) for storage and transport. BoSS will yield a bioprocessing system that enables scalable production of thermally stable cells, paving the way for a new era of efficient and resilient manufacturing and distribution of biologics without any need for cold storage. BoSS-developed technologies will also accelerate many other avenues in biotechnology that directly impact healthcare, including bio-surveillance, regenerative medicine, large-scale genetic testing, blood product supply, and wound repair, in addition to improving access to a wide range of existing biotherapeutics.

This ISO is intended to solicit:

1) Performer teams that can pioneer breakthrough cell stabilization technologies and integrate these technologies into a commercially viable system for producing cell therapy products at scale. Strategic partnerships are encouraged to best position technologies for commercialization success, such as assembling multidisciplinary teams that may include experts from academic, industry, regulatory, commercialization, and non-traditional backgrounds.

2) An Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) partner to reliably provide well-characterized, clinically relevant, government-selected cells to Technical Area Performers. This partner will also assess cell viability and system performance at critical junctures throughout the program.

• Background

  This year approximately 150 million Americans will use at least one thermally unstable biologic, such as a monoclonal antibody, vaccine, or cell therapy. The instability of these medicines necessitates a reliance on cold chain, which jeopardizes product effectiveness, escalates costs, and limits access due to complex, temperature-dependent manufacturing and distribution schemes. Furthermore, costly ultra-cold cryopreservation is the standard approach to extending shelf-life stability for life saving biologics such as CGTs. However, demand for CGTs continues to surge, powered by their transformative impact on healthcare and reflected in rapid market expansion. Globally, there are now >3000 CGTs in the development pipeline, ranging from pre-clinical through pre-registration phases. Innovative solutions that relieve cold chain requirements while preserving shelf-life stability are crucial to meeting this rising demand, as FDA approval and widespread patient access to CGTs rely on maintaining product quality throughout storage and distribution.

  BoSS aims to develop innovative technologies that preserve cells at ambient temperatures, a breakthrough approach we will subsequently refer to as biostabilization. Achieving biostabilization remains a two-fold challenge that has yet to be overcome. The first challenge requires cellular interventions to preserve the integrity and function of vital elements prior to undergoing stabilization, enabling cells to withstand physical changes that would otherwise cause irreversible damage. This could include delivering protectants into cells and/or altering cells in other ways to improve processing and storage resilience. To maintain the clinical utility of cell products, cellular interventions to prepare and deploy biostabilization must be both biocompatible and reversible. The second challenge involves implementing aseptic, cell-friendly handling instrumentation to deploy stabilization techniques across various production scales.
  
  One approach to address the first challenge is to adopt nature’s strategies to accomplish biostabilization. For example, ‘anhydrobiotes’ can tolerate extreme loss of water and persist in a dehydrated state for years (e.g., tardigrades, rotifers, brine shrimp), quickly regaining full function after rehydration. Molecular contributors to this resilience have been elucidated such as amorphous trehalose glass and special classes of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Recent studies have revealed cell structure re-arrangements and stress-induced formation of molecular condensates that may be essential for surviving the stresses of dry processing. Other discoveries from the genomic to the organismal scale form the natural basis of desiccation tolerance and may be adapted or improved upon for biostabilization. Solutions inspired by chemistry and materials science advances are also encouraged along with approaches that employ biocompatible polymers, scaffolds, multi-organic frameworks, or cell encapsulation to protect and stabilize cells.

  Addressing the second challenge requires development of new processing approaches and potentially new instrumentation that can yield products suitable for ambient storage. Current gold standard methods for batch processing like lyophilization (freeze-drying) are energy-intensive, slow, and challenging to apply to complex biologics. While appropriate for proteins, antibodies, and even some vaccines, lyophilization is a risky and unproven approach for high-value cell products that are widely used in the biopharma industry as starting materials, manufacturing intermediates, host cells, and cell-based therapies. Nascent technologies like microwave-assisted vacuum foam-drying, thin film freeze-drying, and polymerization gelation exhibit potential for processing complex biologics but remain at a low manufacturing readiness level (MRL), i.e., early-stage development and requires significant development to establish full-scale production. Established technologies with high MRL, such as spray-drying, commonly used for food production, offer the advantage of continuous processing and may have potential for adaptation to biologics.
  

  Successful completion of BoSS will yield a bioprocessing system designed as a platform technology for stabilizing cell biologics capable of easy integration into biomanufacturing pipelines. The bioprocessing system will enable scalable production and distribution of thermally stable cells benefiting the biopharmaceutical ecosystem that uses cells as starting materials, manufacturing intermediates, and CGTs. Breakthroughs from BoSS are expected to yield biostabilization innovations including intracellular and extracellular protectants and stabilizers, enabling bioprocessing technologies, and re-animation products. Together, BoSS bioprocessing system and biostabilization technologies will be commercially viable solutions that will establish a new paradigm for biomanufacturing designed to reduce costs and ensure that biological medicines are accessible to patients, including those living in the most remote and resource-limited communities.

• Technical Areas

  BoSS envisions that successful solutions will converge from extremophile biology, biomaterials science, biomanufacturing, pharmaceutical formulation, process engineering, and device development to unlock new bioprocessing and biostabilization solutions, bridging historical silos in biostasis science and advancing biological medicines. Proposals are required to address solutions to both technical areas:
  
  Technical Area 1 (TA1): BioPrep

  Approaches to BioPrep include preparing, protecting, and other methods of intervention to allow cells to endure and recover from biostabilization at room temperature. BioPrep solutions should be reversible interventions that support the suspension of biological activity while ensuring cellular health and integrity upon reanimation. BioPrep solutions may also include the development of re-animation techniques and solutions that rapidly restore biological activities after biostabilization.
  
  Technical Area 2 (TA2): Bioprocessing

  Bioprocessing technologies (e.g., instruments, devices) should enable the deployment of biostabilization concepts at scale. Activities may include the scale-up of an early MRL, cell-friendly processing technology, or the adaptation of scaled systems that can be re-designed to safely and gently handle cells. The proposed solution should mitigate stress on cells while achieving biostabilization with preserved quality and function for extended durations at ambient temperatures.
  
  Proposers must submit proposals to both TAs. A conforming proposal will account for all program requirements outlined in this ISO, both TA-specific and overall program milestones and metrics.

• Program Overview

  Technology commercialization is a critical part of achieving the ARPA-H mission to improve health outcomes for all Americans. To support this goal, progress will be measured by strategic metrics and milestones that must be met to advance through subsequent phases. Technologies will advance across three integrated phases designed to drive both technical advancement and commercial translation:

  •

  Phase 1 focuses on establishing the scientific feasibility of ambient biostabilization. This proof-of-concept stage includes developing innovative cell preparation approaches with enabling instrumentation that, together, are capable of inducing biostabilization as well as re-animation methods to restore function after biostabilization.

  •

  Phase 2 emphasizes integrated capability demonstrations, converging biological and manufacturing innovations into a cohesive bioprocessing system that can produce stabilized cells under simulated commercial conditions.

  •

  Phase 3 advances to scaled solution development and industry transition, preparing the bioprocessing system for market entry through GMP-compliant production, strategic industry partnerships, and validation in real-world use cases.

  Performer teams must meet increasingly stringent technological capability requirements and stabilized cell quality metrics during each phase to demonstrate progress on biostabilization technology development. Performers will choose cells used for end of phase demonstrations from a list of government-selected cell types, which will be identified at the start of the performance period. Sub-phase milestones may be demonstrated on cell types chosen by the Performer, with consideration to the restrictions identified in Table 1. In later stages, end of phase demonstrations will be permitted on cells that are aligned with Phase 3 transition partners. Ideal transitional partners for Performers are organizations equipped with established distribution networks to seamlessly integrate the developed bioprocessing system into their existing biomanufacturing pipelines for cell biologics, accelerating the path from innovation to implementation.

  At the end of the program, biostabilization technologies will demonstrate capability, scalability, and applicability of commercially viable platform technologies that enable room temperature storage and distribution of stabilized cells agnostic of cell type, supporting widespread access to biologic medicines. The ideal bioprocessing system will integrate seamlessly with biomanufacturing and fill-finish systems. Ultimately, partnerships will culminate into early adoption of a new commercially viable bioprocessing system capable of scalable production of stabilized cell products that meet Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and GMP standards with a path paved for commercialization to support broad industry adoption.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the primary funding, BoSS awardees gain several indirect strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection by ARPA-H establishes strong scientific legitimacy and positions your technology as a potential national-level biomanufacturing platform.

Enhanced Visibility & Notoriety
Awardees are featured through ARPA-H communications, Proposers’ Day events, and industry engagement, increasing recognition among biotech investors, health systems, and biopharma manufacturers.

Access to a National Innovation Network
BoSS includes structured engagement with an Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V) partner, FDA interactions, and optional commercialization support—creating opportunities for partnerships, pilot studies, and eventual technology adoption.

Stronger Exit, Growth, and Acquisition Potential
Nondilutive development of platform technologies can significantly improve valuation, especially for companies working in CGT manufacturing, biosurveillance platforms, or enabling bioprocessing technologies. Government validation reduces perceived technical risk for acquirers and later-stage investors.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Key dates:

• Proposers’ Day: January 29, 2026

• Performer Solution Summary: February 19, 2026

• Performer Pitch: March 26, 2026

• IV&V Solution Summary: April 17, 2026

• IV&V Pitch: May 15, 2026

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is issued through the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), under the Scalable Solutions Office, using Other Transaction (OT) authority for high-risk, high-impact biomedical innovation.

Who is eligible to apply?

Universities, Nonprofits, Small and large commercial businesses, Non-U.S. entities (with restrictions; must not be from foreign entities of concern), Must conduct work in the U.S., FFRDCs and U.S. Government entities cannot participate as Performers.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

See full solicitation for details. Strong candidates include companies with capabilities in:

• Cell & gene therapy engineering

• Bioprocessing & biomanufacturing instrumentation

• Biomaterials, polymers, encapsulation, or intracellular protectants

• Cell preservation technologies (cryopreservation alternatives, desiccation biology)

• Microfluidics, closed-system processing, or continuous manufacturing

• Regulatory-ready biologics or device development expertise

• Advanced analytical platforms (cell viability, potency, functional assays)

Winning projects will propose integrated TA1 + TA2 solutions capable of achieving:

• Room-temperature stability (14 days → 3 months)

• Reanimation <1 hour by Phase 3

• High viability, function, and potency metrics across multiple cell types

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• No genetic manipulation of cells

• No dangerous gain-of-function research (per EO 14292)

• No demonstrations on RBCs or microbial species

• No slow (>4 hr prep or >1 day processing) methods

• No methods that cannot scale or meet GMP requirements

• No traditional lyophilization

• Teams must maintain SAM.gov registration for Step 2

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a solution summary under this opportunity will likely take 50-70 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

DARPA Information Innovation Office (I2O) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Information Innovation Office (I2O) Office-Wide BAA invites proposals for multiple awards to develop revolutionary information and computational technologies in areas such as transformative AI, resilient and secure software, cyber operations, and information-domain capabilities. Abstracts may be submitted on a rolling basis until November 1, 2026, and full proposals until November 30, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA does not publish fixed award amounts for this BAA. I2O funds a limited number of proposals, and budgets are determined by the technical approach, the scope of work, and alignment with I2O priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

The Information Innovation Office (I2O) creates groundbreaking science and delivers future capabilities in the information and computational domains to surprise adversaries and maintain enduring advantage for national security. I2O efforts typically address one or more of the following key thrust areas:

• Transformative AI

  We seek to invest in trustworthy, disruptive artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and methodologies relevant to national security. We define trustworthy systems as ones that operate competently, interact appropriately with humans, and behave ethically and morally.

• Resilient, Adaptable, and Secure Software and Complex Systems

  We believe a world without software vulnerabilities is possible. We seek to use formal methods and third-wave AI to make it easier to understand, build, update, repair, and restore complex software and cyber-physical systems with multi-system-wide, securityrelevant correctness guarantees. We also seek methods to provide continuing operation of a system under duress. Techniques and tools are provided as open-source software for use by the research and software development communities, the defense industrial base (DIB), and the Department of Defense (DoD). Example systems are large scale manufacturing, financial systems, large scale infrastructure, and transportation systems.

• Offensive and Defensive Cyber Security and Privacy

  We're leveraging advances in state-of-the-art AI and secure and resilient tools and technologies to produce trustworthy cyber capabilities that operate beyond human capacity and speed. We seek capabilities to assure the privacy of users and user information and actions. Our efforts anticipate adversary countermeasures to create enduring capabilities.

• Fighting in the Information Domain

  We focus on measuring the health of and protecting and detecting attacks on the information domain, broadly construed. Our research portfolio spans many levels: 

  • Cognitive: Beliefs and attitudes 

  • Semantic: Knowledge that's specialized to particular domains, e.g., scientific discourse, the financial system, supply chains, and other areas 

  • Tracking: Recording the digital artifacts of interactions with the myriad digital devices required by modern life 

  • Transport: Delivery of electronic messages in many forms and with various gradations of observability

• Other

  I2O may also consider submissions outside these thrust areas if the proposal involves the development of novel capabilities having a promise to provide decisive information or computational advantage for the United States and its allies. I2O seeks unconventional approaches that are outside the mainstream, challenge accepted assumptions, and have the potential to change established practices radically. Proposed research should enable revolutionary advances in science, technology, or systems. Specifically excluded is research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of the art.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, DARPA funding offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Receiving a DARPA award signals exceptional scientific and engineering merit, which accelerates engagement with primes, integrators, strategic partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
DARPA programs are frequently highlighted in federal communications, technical conferences, and defense media—boosting your company’s profile across the national security sector.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain access to DARPA program managers, government labs, test ranges, and a high-level innovation network—opening doors to future contracts and partnerships.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive funding that matures breakthrough technology, combined with the DARPA “stamp,” often increases valuation and attractiveness to large defense, aerospace, semiconductor, and AI-focused acquirers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Abstracts: May be submitted on a rolling basis until November 1, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern.

Full proposals: May be submitted on a rolling basis until November 30, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern.

The BAA does not specify dates for award decisions or when funding would be released; those depend on DARPA’s evaluation and negotiation timelines.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the U.S. Department of Defense through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), specifically the Information Innovation Office (I2O).

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

The evaluation criteria (in descending order of importance) are:

• Overall Scientific and Technical Merit

  • Innovative, feasible, and complete technical approach.

  • Team expertise and experience aligned with proposed tasks.

  • Clear deliverables and logical task sequence.

  • Identification and credible mitigation of key technical risks.

• Potential Contribution and Relevance to the DARPA Mission

  • Strengthens the national security technology base.

  • Supports DARPA’s mission to make pivotal early technology investments that create or prevent technological surprise.

• Plans to Implement Resilient Software (when applicable)

  • Clear capability to design, implement, and deliver resilient software.

  • Ensures interoperability, security, and ability to meet DoD/DARPA mission objectives.

  • Uses formal methods when appropriate to work toward eliminating software vulnerabilities.

• Cost Realism

  • Costs are realistic and consistent with the technical approach and Statement of Work.

  • Effort leverages relevant prior research to maximize benefit from available funding.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Abstract requirement: A proposal will not be reviewed unless an abstract has been submitted and DARPA has issued an invitation to propose.

• Scope of work: Proposers may not propose work that they have already completed or that has already received funding or a positive funding decision from DARPA or another Government agency.

• Revolutionary advances only: Research that primarily yields evolutionary improvements to existing state of the art is explicitly excluded.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available to submit an abstract for a flat fee of $5,000.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

DARPA Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) Office-Wide BAA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) is offering funding for revolutionary research across microelectronics, photonic circuits, quantum systems, biological/organic circuits, advanced manufacturing ecosystems, and dual-use microsystems. Multiple awards are anticipated, with no predefined funding limits. Abstracts are accepted until January 15, 2026, and proposals until March 2, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding amount is flexible. DARPA anticipates multiple awards, and efforts may span basic research (6.1), applied research (6.2), or advanced technology development (6.3). Proposers can also elect an Accelerated Award Option for awards under $2 million with 30-day award timelines.

What could I use the funding for?

Research areas of current interest to MTO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

• Quantum circuits

  1. Interconnect technologies for transferring quantum states between qubit platforms

  2. Generalizable improvements for processing chain for all types of quantum sensors

  3. High density low loss mixed signal transfer between room and quantum temperatures

• Biological circuits

  1. High throughput molecular readers for full spectrum sequencing

  2. 3-dimensional bio-templated self-assembly of microsystems

  3. Highly-parallel DNA writing platforms for long DNA writes for genome-scale complexity with low error

• Photonic circuits

  1. Applications for purely photonic circuits not realizable in electronic circuits

  2. Chip scale photonics for ultralow noise microwave sources

  3. Tunable chip scale ultrafast (<10 ps) lasers

  4. Fiber-inspired ultralow loss integrated photonics

• Manufacturing Ecosystem

  1. Litho- and etch-free direct nanoscale semiconductor manufacturing

  2. Low-loss high permeability/permittivity materials

  3. High density cryogenic-to-room-temperature interconnects

  4. Atomically precise, multi-chemistry molecular manufacturing technologies

  5. Energy reclamation from low-grade waste heat

  6. Reconfigurable multiscale manufacturing for onshore manufacturing

• Dual Use by Design

  1. All-weather long distance high bandwidth communications

  2. Commercially relevant tool development challenge problems

  3. Conformal and malleable batteries

  4. Design and assembly of complex microsystems in supply-chain-free environments

  5. Reconfigurable additive manufacturing for multiple classes of materials

  6. Context aware imaging

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, awardees gain significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
DARPA selection signals elite technical quality and national-security relevance — often accelerating partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility
Awards frequently lead to increased visibility through DARPA communications, publications, and industry attention.

Ecosystem Access & Collaboration
Awardees join a national innovation community spanning quantum, photonics, microelectronics, and advanced materials — opening doors to long-term collaborations and follow-on opportunities.

Stronger Exit & Acquisition Potential
Non-dilutive support enables deep tech maturation without equity loss. Companies validated by DARPA historically see improved valuation, stronger commercial traction, and increased acquisition interest.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Abstract Deadline: January 15, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

Proposal Deadline: March 2, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

DARPA reviews proposals on a rolling basis.

If you select the Accelerated Award Option (<$2M projects), DARPA may issue an award within 30 days of selection notification.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Microsystems Technology Office (STO).

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Research must be revolutionary, not incremental.

• CMMC Level 2 is required for procurement contracts beginning Nov 10, 2025.

• Foreign influence and security review applies to fundamental research teams.

• Classified submissions require coordination with DARPA security.

• Export control and CUI restrictions apply.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Autonomous Interventions and Robotics (AIR) – ARPA-H-SOL-26-146

Below is a summary. Please see the official solicitation on sam.gov for details (link in Resources Section).

Executive Summary:

The AIR program will award multiple OT agreements to teams developing autonomous endovascular robotic systems and interventional microbots that can perform key parts of surgical and interventional procedures without direct human control. The program runs for five years (two-year Phase 1 and three-year Phase 2). Companies must submit a Solution Summary by January 26, 2026 and a Full Proposal by March 30, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

The ISO does not specify a minimum or maximum award amount. ARPA-H states only that it expects to make multiple OT awards under this opportunity; budgets will be driven by the scope, risk, and duration of each proposed 5-year effort (2-year Phase 1 + 3-year Phase 2).

What could I use the funding for?

The Autonomous Interventions and Robotics (AIR) program aims to catalyze the development of autonomous robotic surgery—an intervention during which a robot performs part, or all, of the procedure without direct human input. AIR encompasses two (2) technical areas: Technical Area 1 (TA1)—endovascular robotics, and Technical Area 2 (TA2)—microbots. Technical Area 1 comprises sub-areas TA1-A—endovascular robotic systems and TA1-B—endovascular simulation environment.

• Background

  During an endovascular procedure, the surgeon reviews the pre-operative CT of the patient’s vasculature, makes a small incision in the patient’s skin, then manually navigates guidewires and catheters from the femoral or radial artery up into the patient’s brain, using occasional guidance from intra-operative 2D fluoroscopy images. The surgeon steers the distal tip of the catheter around tortuous anatomy by pushing, pulling, and twisting the catheter at the entry point—a challenging process requiring dexterity, mental mapping, and an understanding of the physical properties of catheters. Often, the surgeon must try multiple types of catheters, restarting the navigation from the beginning and losing precious time in the process. Once the target is reached, additional challenges await. For example, during a mechanical thrombectomy—the removal of a stroke-inducing blood clot from the brain—once the catheter reaches the clot, there is ambiguity around contact and suction; with little tactile feedback beyond translated resistance, the surgeon needs to make a seal and suction the clot. In addition, endovascular surgeons receive high yearly doses of radiation during procedures, increasing their risk of cancer and other sequelae such as cataracts1.

  Thrombectomies are a critical unmet need in the United States and worldwide. Every year, approximately 335,000 Americans experience an ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion (LVO), a situation in which a major blood vessel in the brain is blocked by a clot. The standard of care is to mechanically remove the clot via thrombectomy; unfortunately, only ~40,000 Americans per year—about 10% of the patients with LVOs—receive thrombectomies2. There are only 311 thrombectomy-capable centers in the United States as of 20223, and they are unevenly distributed, with 50% of Americans living more than one hour away from one. Time to procedure is crucial; every 10-minute delay in revascularization lowers a patient’s disability-free lifetime by ~40 days and increases health care costs by $10,0004. While thrombectomies are currently recommended for patients within six hours from stroke onset, recent clinical studies have shown benefit to 24 hours and beyond5.

  More broadly, other specialized or highly invasive procedures are often the only way to obtain disease diagnostics and treat pathological conditions. These include biopsies of suspicious tissue, ablations of uterine fibroids, and destruction of kidney stones, among numerous others. Overall, surgery remains dangerous: more than one in three patients experience adverse events during surgical care. Furthermore, surgery requires specialist care, which can involve extensive travel and waiting times.

  Automated systems such as microbots (small, mechanical, electronic or hybrid devices) have the potential to dramatically increase access to interventions. However, surgical microrobot research and development is largely at an early stage and mostly devoted to biosensing and microrobot motion; the smaller the entity, the more difficult it is for the entity to propel itself directionally. Implementation of end-to-end clinical solutions is notional at best, except for pill-sized gastro-intestinal (GI) imaging devices, which are specifically excluded from accepted AIR solutions. Autonomous endovascular systems also currently do not exist; although complex robotics elements have been developed in industry and academia, autonomous navigation and control algorithms are still in their infancy.

• Program Goals

  AIR aims to make endovascular procedures available at hospitals everywhere through autonomous robotic systems; it is understood, though, that the transition from the current state of clinical care to this audacious goal is likely to involve multiple practical evolutionary steps. They will likely include: a) clinical trials during which endovascular surgeons present in the room will be ready to take over at any moment from the autonomous endovascular robotic system; b) a first deployment phase, in which local general surgeons and remote endovascular surgeons will oversee the procedure; and ultimately, c) a phase in which only local general surgeons (or other medical professionals) will oversee the operation of thoroughly validated autonomous systems.

  AIR microbots are intended to create a paradigm shift in interventional procedures, transforming these invasive procedures—currently performed in advanced care settings and requiring skilled practitioners—into minimally invasive procedures performed in a general practitioner’s office. Microbots are expected to simplify existing procedures, enable completely new procedures, reduce complications rates and costs, and increase procedure availability.

• Technical Area 1

  Technical Area 1 (TA1) of AIR aims to develop fully autonomous robotic endovascular intervention systems. After a medical professional inserts the catheter system into the femoral or radial artery, the robot will complete an endovascular procedure without human intervention. The system capabilities will be demonstrated in several procedures, including 3D rotational angiogram imaging, vascular embolization, and, most importantly, thrombectomy. Autonomous endovascular systems developed in TA1-A will encompass:

  1) Robotic control systems that can manipulate catheters and guidewires

  2) Navigation algorithms based on pre-operative imaging and real-time sensing

  3) Steerable catheters and guidewires (if required)

  4) Solutions for autonomous clot removal and vascular embolization

  In addition, TA1-B will develop an in silico testing and validation environment for these robots, an activity that will include the collection of fluoroscopic videos of endovascular procedures, CT angiograms, and other imaging modalities as needed for training.

  Note that autonomous blood vessel access is out of scope for the AIR program; a surgeon or surgical technician will obtain vessel access.
  
  Additional details are available in the solicitation.

• Technical Area 2

  Technical Area 2 (TA2) of AIR aims to develop a set of interventional microbots. Performers will specify a target clinical indication and develop microbots that move, sense, and act to diagnose or treat this condition by means of more precise targeting and/or less invasive access. TA2 teams will address:

  a. Microbot locomotion

  b. Anatomy/pathology targeting methods

  c. Miniaturization or externalization of power supplies and computational processing

  d. Autonomous or automated action

  e. Microbot removal or deactivation

  Gastrointestinal/ingestible pill microbots that only image, stimulate, and/or deliver cargo are out of scope for the AIR program.

  Although the technologies for both TAs are developed and validated for a target indication, it is expected that they will serve as platforms for multiple interventions and procedures.
  
  Additional details are available in the solicitation.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, AIR awards can provide strategic benefits typical of ARPA-style programs:

• Government technical validation: Being selected by ARPA-H signals that your approach is technically ambitious and nationally relevant in health innovation and surgical autonomy, which can help in discussions with strategics, hospital systems, and investors.

• Positioning for regulatory and ecosystem engagement: AIR is structured with parallel FDA collaboration (for TA1) and explicit regulatory milestones (e.g., simulation frameworks, Q-submissions) that can de-risk later clinical and commercialization steps.

• Access to a high-end performer network: Performers will interact with other top robotics, imaging, and microbotics teams, plus FDA scientific collaborators and ARPA-H program staff—often leading to follow-on partnerships and future solicitations.

• Nondilutive growth capital: Because funding is nondilutive, successful teams can mature high-capex platforms (robotics, microfabrication, imaging) while preserving equity and potentially driving higher valuations and stronger exit options down the line.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

1. Proposer’s Day: December 16, 2025

2. Q&A deadline: January 20, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

3. Solution Summaries due: January 26, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

4. Full Proposals due: March 30, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

Where does this funding come from?

The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a federal R&D agency within HHS, issuing awards under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 290c(g)(1)(D) via OT agreements.

Who is eligible to apply?

• Universities and other educational institutions

• Non-profit organizations

• Small businesses

• Other-than-small businesses

What companies and projects are likely to win?

1. Overall Scientific & Technical Merit:
   Companies proposing highly innovative, technically rigorous, and fully executable plans with well-defined milestones, clear risk-mitigation strategies, and IP structures that enable commercialization are most competitive. Winning projects will demonstrate a credible path to achieving AIR’s demanding 5-year technical milestones.

2. Proposer’s Capabilities & Related Experience:
   Teams with deep, directly relevant expertise—including experienced robotics engineers, imaging specialists, microbot developers, and required clinicians (e.g., an endovascular neurosurgeon for TA1-A)—are most likely to win. Prior success delivering complex R&D programs on time and on budget is a major advantage.

3. Assessment of Proposed Cost/Price:
   ARPA-H will favor proposers who submit realistic, well-justified budgets that reflect the true complexity of autonomous surgical robotics or microbot development. Costs must align with the technical plan, leverage past research efficiently, and avoid artificially low budgets or staffing junior personnel simply to reduce cost.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Key restrictions from the ISO include:

  • Scope restrictions

    • TA1 excludes autonomous vascular access and closure; a human must obtain vessel access.

    • GI “pill camera–only” devices and ingestible microbots that only image, stimulate, or deliver cargo are out of scope; GI microbots must at least sense and biopsy, or sense/biopsy/ablate, to qualify.

    • Purely biological, purely chemical, or chem-bio-only delivery concepts (no mechanical/electronic component) are not acceptable microbots. Nanoparticles alone are out of scope.

  • Team composition and application rules

    • TA1-A teams must include at least one endovascular neurosurgeon.

    • A given team may propose to either TA1-A or TA1-B, but not both

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions summary under this BAA will likely take 40–60 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Check the full solicitation here.

DIU Project Janus – Advanced Nuclear Microreactor Power Plant Prototyping

Executive Summary:

Project Janus is soliciting commercial solutions to design, prototype, and deploy advanced nuclear Microreactor Power Plants (MPPs) that can provide continuous, resilient power across Army installations. Awarded vendors will prototype both a First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and a Second-of-a-Kind (SOAK) MPP, leading to potential follow-on production and long-term power purchase agreements. Solution Briefs are due December 15, 2025, so companies should begin preparing ASAP.

How much funding would I receive?

DIU does not publish fixed award amounts, but nuclear prototyping OTAs typically fall within the multi-million to tens-of-millions range, depending on complexity and vendor contributions.

Importantly, DIU OTAs can lead directly to large follow-on production contracts or long-term electricity PPAs without further competition, enabling far greater lifetime contract value.

What could I use the funding for?

Problem Statement

Ensuring consistent, resilient energy across military installations and operational theaters has become an increasingly complex challenge for the U.S. military. Aging infrastructure, dependence on vulnerable civilian power grids, complex liquid fuel logistics, and rising energy demands from advanced technologies all threaten mission assurance. Frequent electricity outages, grid disruptions, and limited backup capacity jeopardize critical systems responsible for command, control, communications, and logistics. This directly undermines readiness, training, and operational effectiveness. These vulnerabilities underscore the urgent need for secure, scalable, and independent energy solutions that ensure continuous power for the warfighter to operate anytime, anywhere, regardless of external grid instability or supply chain disruptions.

The U.S. Army, alongside the Defense Innovation Unit, seeks to prototype Microreactor Power Plant(s) (MPPs) capable of developing a suite of advanced nuclear power plant energy solutions to meet the needs of the U.S. Department of War (DoW). These MPPs will leverage recent advances in the nuclear industry to provide continuous and reliable power in all DoW scenarios and will be demonstrated on a military installation within the United States by 2030.

Background

On 23 May 2025, four executive orders (EOs) were issued that aimed at modernizing America’s nuclear energy posture, with direct implications for the Army and the broader DoW. In particular, EO 14299 Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security, states that “it is the policy of the United States to ensure the rapid development, deployment, and use of advanced nuclear technologies to support national security objectives, such as the protection and operation of critical infrastructure, critical defense facilities, and other mission capability resources.” These orders represent a strategic shift towards immediately and impactfully leveraging advanced nuclear technologies. Meeting the objectives of EO14299 requires a focus on both installation and operational energy goals through a coordinated prototype program that leverages MPP technologies to address the Department of War’s energy needs. 

Project Approach

The broader Department of the Army’s Janus program objective is to develop a suite of prototype solutions for MPPs that can supply power for both installations and non-permanent operations. The Janus project approach under the DIU CSO will use an iterative prototype development process to provide a clear path to transition of the successful commercially demonstrated technology solutions. “Suite” refers to the DoW’s intent to select multiple reactor designs for the OTA Agreement, each to be paired with an Army installation by the Army after contract award. This will involve prototyping a First of a Kind (FOAK) MPP under the Army’s regulatory authority, followed shortly after by a Second of a Kind (SOAK) MPP, also using the Army’s regulatory authority. The Department is seeking fission-based solution sets for installation and defense purposes. 

Vendors will be paired with Army installations after the OTA contract award. Vendors will develop their FOAK prototype for demonstration on that installation and commence design of the SOAK prototype near the end of FOAK design. The SOAK prototype is expected to build on lessons learned from the FOAK and include design changes from the FOAK prototype, through iterative prototyping. 

Vendor solutions submitted under the AOI are highly encouraged to use the FOAK and SOAK approach in their proposals, and discuss the path from SOAK to Nth-of-a-kind production. Solutions may utilize the operating life of both the FOAK and SOAK MPPs in series to reach the 30-year lifetime power generation, assuming continuity of power across the 30-year period. 

The Army will be announcing the selection of the initial group of installations for the Janus project MPP prototypes at a later date. Vendors are prohibited from contacting or responding to queries from the installations regarding any aspect of CSO HQ084520SC001 or the Janus project. Vendors who do not comply with the prohibition may be removed from participation in the Janus Project. 

Project Objectives

The Department is seeking solution briefs for the full lifecycle of MPPs that would notionally start operations at an Army installation located in the United States before the end of calendar year 2030. Solution briefs should include all stages of an MPP’s lifecycle: design, testing, regulation, construction, operations, deconstruction, and returning the site to an unrestricted release status.

The objectives of the prototype include: 

• Provide mission assurance through energy resilience for a range of defense applications. 

• Assemble and operate prototype MPPs on military installations within the United States to demonstrate the capability of the MPP designs to provide safe, secure, reliable, and environmentally compliant electricity and thermal energy (if needed) in support of readiness goals for mission critical assets.

• Engage with the government and privatized distribution providers, transmission providers, and commodity providers currently serving U.S. Military installations to facilitate seamless and resilient energy regardless of commercial grid conditions.

Final solutions will follow a process under the U.S. Army Regulatory Authority for the entire lifecycle. The U.S. Army’s regulatory authority is derived from section 91b of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. § 2121(b)), as implemented pursuant to the Presidential Directive of 23 September 1961. Vendors will follow the Army regulatory process as documented in AR 50-7 (2016), although additional guidance will be provided during Phase 2 and throughout the FOAK design. AR 50-7 can be found at: https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r50-7_Web_FINAL.pdf. 

Awarded vendors will be given opportunities to provide feedback on gaps in Army regulatory processes as additional regulatory guidance is provided. Additional regulatory requirements, such as transportation of nuclear material on public highways, should be addressed by Vendors during their proposals.

Reviews and implementation during the MPP prototype development process will include an integrated and phased approach to compliance with planning and design, planning and construction, architecture and engineering, building construction, environmental, operating, safety and physical/cyber protection, emergency response planning, deconstruction, and spent fuel management requirements. 

A successful MPP prototype will provide a sound and demonstrated technological solution for commercial operations. A successful prototype will complete fuel load and testing phases and will be permitted by the Army Regulator to begin normal operations. The OTA prototype will transition to unrestricted operations as a COCO MPP with a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), production OTA, or other Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) based contract.

Desired Solution Features 

Desired solution features include the following attributes and capabilities: 

• Incorporates nuclear fuel that is enriched to 20% or less U-235 and that is legal for defense purposes. The fuel must be qualified, available, and fabricated on a timeline that will meet program timelines.  

  • Defense-purpose feedstock may be made available as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) for FOAK and SOAK MPPs through an Army fuel allocation process. If feedstock is provided as GFE, vendors will be responsible for transportation, blending, and fabrication of the fuel. 

  • Vendors should address the implications of a) the Government not providing feedstock as GFE, b) of the Government providing feedstock as GFE for only the first fueling, and c) the Government providing feedstock as GFE for the operational life of the MPP.

• Capable of producing electrical power in the range of kW-level up to 20MWe (up to 60 MWth). Capable of local control and dispatch and integrated to the greatest extent practicable into existing infrastructure, operations centers (if applicable), workflows, and operations and maintenance systems. 

• Capable of startup/shutdown and monitoring operations both with and without commercial power availability (both black start and grid-connected start capability). 

• Capable of MPP operations with a commercial power connection, and an alternative credited independent power source as a backup. 

• The MPP should be operated only from the control room located within the Army installation (remote or wireless operation is not allowed). 

  • MPPs with remote maintenance and diagnostics capabilities that comply with relevant cybersecurity U.S. Government standards, e.g., NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 for Federal Contractors, may be considered. 

  • The MPP control room must be designed to accommodate two operators, with space for an additional person, at a minimum. 

• The MPP design should include passive safety features to the extent practical to ensure MPP key safety functions are satisfied under all conditions, states, and modes. 

• Radiation exposure at the MPP site boundary should not exceed the limits provided in 10 CFR 20 during routine operations. Proposals must sufficiently account for relevant factors, including sky shine, emissions from activated site materials, and surrounding buildings at various elevations around the site boundary. 

• The MPP design must address Natural Hazard Phenomena, including seismic loads, external floods, and other potential hazards.

• The MPP design must have clearly articulated systems and safety case approaches, including an initial set of proposed design criteria and design safety strategy.

• Vendor strategy and capability to continuously provide full power supply for up to 30 years, including operations, maintenance, sustainment, and refueling activities. 

  • There are no restrictions on the proposed strategy to achieve 30-years of continuous power (e.g., refueling or ‘replaceable’ modules to maintain continuity of operations). 

  • The overall lifecycle strategy of the MPP by the Vendor will be evaluated and must include associated costs/risks with the proposed strategy for long-term operations.

• Non-core irradiated material should be removed or qualified for unrestricted release within 2 years upon completion or termination of the power production contract. An initial irradiated material disposal plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before design permitting. 

• Irradiated core material should be removed from the site notionally within 5 years of completion or termination of the power production contract, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Army. An initial core decommissioning plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before MPP operations are permitted. 

• A target site area should be sized appropriately for FOAK (and SOAK if co-located) to ensure compliance with Federal radiation limits in 10 CFR 20 and the anticipated Seismic Design Category. Selected Vendors will be paired with an installation post-OTA award.

• Reasonable and appropriate safety, physical, cyber, and safeguards measures should be implemented in the design consistent with best practices. Army-specific requirements will be provided to vendors invited to participate in Phase 2 Pitches. 

• In addition to the above desired solution features, solutions must address the aspects below: 

  • A nuclear supply chain for nuclear-grade equipment that is clearly identified and credibly available to supply equipment to meet the notional timeline. The nuclear supply chain identified must meet defense-purpose limitations; any part of the nuclear supply chain reliant on international sources must be identified and mitigated with a plan approved by the Army.

  • Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) for equipment included in the design. The TRL and MRL readiness levels will be evaluated in depth during Phase 2 Pitches. 

  • Identified gaps in available Computational analytical tools, Codes, or Standards accepted for nuclear use. Identified analytical tools, Codes, or Standards for which the design will operate outside the approved range 

  • (e.g., the MPP operates at a higher temperature than existing foundational data).

  • Identified gaps in available material performance data for safety or reliability-related equipment under anticipated operating conditions.

  • Plans and approaches to move from FOAK to SOAK, to Nth-of-a-Kind development and production. Plans to commercialize or develop commercial versions of proposed MPP prototype designs.

  • Long-term plans for fuel acquisition and manufacturing, including the status of negotiations or agreements with miners, enrichers and/or fabricators. 

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct prototype funding, awardees gain substantial strategic advantages:

Government Validation & National Credibility
Winning a DIU/Army nuclear award signals unmatched credibility in defense nuclear innovation. This accelerates alignment with primes, utilities, and capital markets.

Path to Long-Term, Non-Dilutive Revenue
Successful prototypes can transition into 30-year Power Purchase Agreements, production OTAs, or FAR contracts, representing massive long-term revenue potential.

Increased Market Visibility
Awardees gain visibility across DoD, DOE, and national energy/security communities—often resulting in media coverage and faster customer traction.

Supply Chain & Regulatory Acceleration
Participation provides exposure to Army regulators, national labs, nuclear fuel providers, and defense-focused supply chain partners—accelerating commercialization beyond the defense market.

Higher Exit and Valuation Potential
Nondilutive support for FOAK/SOAK nuclear builds significantly increases company valuation, technical defensibility, and acquisition potential for defense, energy, and infrastructure buyers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Solution Brief Due: December 15, 2025

• DIU Review: ~30 days for down-select

• Phase 2 Pitch: Invitation-only, early 2026

• Full Proposal (Phase 3): Following successful pitch

• Prototype Awards: Rolling upon approval and funding availability

• FOAK Operation Goal: Before end of 2030

• SOAK Development: Begins near completion of FOAK design

Where does this funding come from?

Project Janus is funded through the U.S. Army and executed under the Defense Innovation Unit's Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process. Awards are made using Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022 (formerly § 2371b).

Who is eligible to apply?

U.S. and foreign-owned commercial companies

• Companies proposing fission-based microreactor designs

• Teams including reactor designers, fabricators, integrators, fuel cycle partners

• Vendors able to provide private financial contributions (projects relying solely on government funds are not eligible)

• Vendors able to comply with Section 889 and Army nuclear regulatory requirements

Multiple submissions and teaming arrangements are allowed.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants will:

• Demonstrate credible, deployable microreactor designs at TRL/MRL levels suitable for FOAK prototyping

• Present a robust plan for 30 years of operations, including refueling or replaceable module strategies

• Show credible nuclear supply chain access for fuel, components, and safety-critical systems

• Provide a realistic path from FOAK → SOAK → Nth-of-a-kind commercialization

• Demonstrate ability to meet Army regulatory requirements under AR 50-7

• Provide private cost share or financial contributions, as required in Phase 2

• Address cybersecurity, safety, passive safety features, and natural hazard requirements

• Show strong corporate viability and commercial market strategy (a key DIU evaluation factor)

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Remote or wireless operation of the MPP is not allowed; control room must be on-installation

• Vendors may not contact Army installations

• All proposals must be unclassified; CUI is not allowed

• Foreign-owned firms must be able to secure necessary clearances

• Vendors must address implications of fuel as GFE vs. vendor-supplied

• Submissions must comply with Army radiation exposure limits and 10 CFR 20

• Private financing participation is required to advance to Phase 2 and Phase 3

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions brief will take 50-75 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Solution Brief for $5000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.

DARPA Strategic Technology Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Strategic Technology Office (STO) BAA is soliciting breakthrough research concepts that create new mission-level capabilities beyond the current state of practice. The agency will fund a limited number of high-risk, high-reward proposals across a broad range of defense and national-security technical domains. Applications are due December 19, 2025.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA does not publish fixed award amounts for this BAA. STO funds a limited number of proposals, and budgets are determined by the technical approach, the scope of work, and alignment with STO priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

DARPA's STO seeks innovative ideas and disruptive technologies that provide the U.S. military and national security leaders with trusted, disruptive capabilities across all physical domains (Air, Space, Sea, and Land) and across the spectrum of competition. STO programs deliver solutions at speed and scale for today's warfighters while developing the resilient "breakthrough" systems and technologies needed for future battlespaces. STO does not focus on one area of responsibility or phenomenology. Rather, STO programs capture the strategic, logistical, and tactical complexity of today's national security environments. STO is a "systems office" seeking to create new "proof-of-concept" mission systems. Its goals are to develop and demonstrate new capabilities that expand what is technically possible.

Research areas of current interest to STO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

•  Acoustic communication and sensing

•  Adaptability

•  Advanced computing

•  Additive manufacturing

•  Architecture and advanced systems engineering

•  Artificial intelligence

•  Autonomy and control algorithms

•  "Big data" analytics

•  Combat identification

•  Command and control (C2)

•  Communications and networking, virtual and adaptive

•  Complexity management

•  Critical infrastructure defense

•  Decision aids and C2 technology

•  DevOps and novel software development and integration

•  Directed energy (DE)

•  Distributed autonomy and teaming (machine-machine, human-machine)

•  Economic security

•  Effects chain functions (disaggregated find, fix, finish, target, engage, assess)

•  Electro-optic/infrared sensors

•  Electromagnetic warfare (EW)

•  High-frequency (HF) communications and sensing

•  High voltage electric power systems and architecture

•  Human behavior modeling

•  Human-machine symbiosis

•  Industrial engineering

•  Integration and reliability technologies

•  Interoperability

•  Logistics

•  Modeling and simulation

•  Microwave and millimeter wave communications and sensing

•  Novel kinetic effects

•  Non-kinetic effects (EW, DE, cyber)

•  Optical technologies

•  Photonics

•  Radio technologies (especially software-defined and novel waveforms and processing)

•  Radar and adaptive arrays

•  Resilient systems

•  Robotics

•  Seekers and other expendable sensors and processing

•  Sensors and analytics

•  Signal processing

•  Space sensors, communications, autonomy, and architectures (especially supporting proliferated low earth orbit constellations)

•  Strategy analysis technology

•  Supply chain analytics

•  System of systems

•  Undersea and seabed technology

•  Tactics development technology

•  Testing and data collection

•  Very low earth orbit (VLEO) technology

•  Very low frequency (VLF) technology

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, DARPA funding offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Receiving a DARPA award signals exceptional scientific and engineering merit, which accelerates engagement with primes, integrators, strategic partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
DARPA programs are frequently highlighted in federal communications, technical conferences, and defense media—boosting your company’s profile across the national security sector.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain access to DARPA program managers, government labs, test ranges, and a high-level innovation network—opening doors to future contracts and partnerships.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive funding that matures breakthrough technology, combined with the DARPA “stamp,” often increases valuation and attractiveness to large defense, aerospace, semiconductor, and AI-focused acquirers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Applications are due December 19, 2025.

DARPA does not publish a fixed award timeline.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Strategic Technology Office (STO), a DoD organization responsible for advanced mission-level systems and emerging technologies.

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposals must not duplicate existing STO programs or other active STO BAAs.

• Research that yields incremental or “evolutionary” improvements is specifically excluded.

• Offerors are strongly encouraged to review current STO programs and speak with program managers before applying.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 Project + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov