ARPA-H STREAM Program: Funding, Deadline, and How to Apply

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

The STREAM program (Systems for Tracking and Resilience in Efficient Agricultural-input Management) is an ARPA-H research initiative that funds breakthrough technology to control weeds while reducing herbicide exposure for farmers, farm workers, consumers, and the environment. Launched by the Department of Health and Human Services through ARPA-H on August 17, 2026, STREAM seeks solutions across four technical areas: next-generation herbicides and formulations, precision and nonchemical weed control, low-cost chemical monitoring, and methods to remove or degrade herbicides in soil and water. Applications are made as Solution Summaries through the Scalable Solutions Office Innovative Solutions Opening (ISO), notice ID ARPA-H-SOL-24-105, which is posted and maintained on SAM.gov. Solution Summaries that select STREAM are due no later than September 14, 2026 at 11:59 pm ET. STREAM is funded through Other Transactions rather than SBIR or STTR grants, so awards are negotiated per project and there is no fixed application dollar cap published in the announcement.

Program Overview

STREAM is ARPA-H's push to modernize American agriculture at the intersection of crop chemistry and human health. Herbicides keep food affordable, support regenerative farming, and help farmers stay productive, but some herbicides and their formulation ingredients can affect people, animals, fish, and pollinators. Farmers, farm workers, and consumers are exposed through food, water, soil, and air, while weeds grow more resistant and off-target runoff harms nearby habitats and rural communities. Alternatives have been sought for years without resolving the core tradeoff between efficacy, health, safety, ecological impact, soil dynamics, and cost.

STREAM aims to close that gap. The program funds safer alternative crop protection formulations, better monitoring of where herbicides travel, and practical ways to break down or remove agricultural chemicals before they reach consumers. If it succeeds, STREAM will lower the cumulative chemical burden on consumers and agricultural workers, protect the soil and water the food supply depends on, and give farmers economically viable alternatives to the products they rely on today.

The program is one piece of a broader interagency commitment. HHS, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have pledged to invest more than one billion dollars in farm modernization and long-term food security, and STREAM advances that effort along with the federal push toward regenerative agriculture. That one billion dollar figure is the joint interagency envelope, not a single STREAM award pool, so applicants should not read it as a per-project budget.

What ARPA-H Is Looking For

STREAM is organized around four coordinated technical areas. A submission must address one or more of these areas to be considered, and ARPA-H encourages interdisciplinary teams drawn from agricultural and weed sciences, artificial intelligence and machine learning, advanced chemistry, drone development, sensing, and related fields.

Technical Area 1: Next-generation herbicides and formulations. Use artificial intelligence and machine learning to discover novel chemical compounds, biologically derived herbicides, and advanced biological treatments that selectively target weeds, including resistant species, while minimizing impacts on the surrounding ecosystem. The goal is efficacy against hard-to-kill weeds without the collateral health and environmental cost of current products.

Technical Area 2: Precision and nonchemical weed control. Advance cost-effective physical weed-control approaches such as laser ablation and miniature autonomous weeders, machine vision-guided targeted herbicide application, real-time drift modeling, and U.S.-manufactured drone-based precision application systems. The aim is to cut chemical inputs while keeping farms productive. Domestic manufacturing of the drone platforms is called out specifically.

Technical Area 3: Improved monitoring of herbicides and associated chemicals. Develop accurate, low-cost, continuous sensing technologies for compounds that are currently difficult and expensive to measure. Better sensing enables community-level monitoring and faster response when a problem appears, rather than waiting on slow or costly lab analysis.

Technical Area 4: Remove or degrade herbicides and associated chemicals. Create methods to rapidly break down agricultural chemicals in soil and water, intercept runoff before it reaches waterways, and reduce residues absorbed by crops. This is the cleanup and containment side of the program, ensuring chemicals are removed from the environment after they do their work.

ARPA-H funds revolutionary rather than incremental ideas, and its programs typically target early-stage technologies with a clear path to maturity. Teams that combine a bold technical concept with a credible plan to reach real-world deployment tend to fit the agency's model best.

Funding and Award Structure

There is an important structural point that startups should understand before applying. STREAM is not an SBIR or STTR opportunity. It runs through a Mission Office Innovative Solutions Opening, and ARPA-H primarily uses Other Transactions and cooperative agreements rather than traditional grants. Other Transactions are flexible business arrangements that let the government adopt commercial-style terms and negotiate scope, milestones, intellectual property, reporting, and payments on a per-award basis.

Because awards are negotiated, the STREAM announcement does not publish a fixed dollar ceiling for applications. For context, ARPA-H operates on an annual budget of roughly 1.5 billion dollars and has historically supported large, milestone-driven awards that can range from single millions to tens of millions of dollars per project, depending on scope. Your budget is built in the Cost Proposal that accompanies a full proposal, and it must reconcile with the milestones and level of effort you commit to.

A few cost-related details from the current ISO documents are worth noting when you plan your budget. Proposers must provide supporting documentation for planned materials and equipment purchases once the unit cost reaches ten thousand dollars, an increase from the prior five thousand dollar threshold. Profit or fee is treated as not applicable unless you specifically include it in the Cost Proposal Workbook. The ISO also defines burdened labor rate and fully burdened labor rate for clarity, and it notes that fully burdened labor rates are not used in the Cost Proposal Workbooks.

Eligibility

ARPA-H opportunities are open to a broad range of performers, including companies, small businesses, startups, universities, and nonprofit research organizations, and the agency encourages collaborative teams. STREAM specifically invites experts across agricultural science, artificial intelligence, chemistry, drones, and sensing to team up on its objectives.

Two eligibility constraints matter for planning. ARPA-H prioritizes awards to domestic recipients, and it cannot award funding to entities organized under the laws of a covered foreign country, which include Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China. Applicants should also be prepared to address organizational conflicts of interest, research security, human and animal subjects considerations where relevant, and biosecurity, since the ISO documents include disclosure requirements in each of these areas.

Timeline

The program was launched on August 17, 2026. Solution Summaries that select STREAM are due no later than September 14, 2026 at 11:59 pm ET. After you submit a Solution Summary, you should wait to hear back from ARPA-H with feedback before proceeding to a full proposal. Only summaries that receive encouragement move forward, which protects you from investing in a full proposal that is not aligned.

It helps to understand how STREAM sits inside the broader solicitation. STREAM submissions flow through the Scalable Solutions Office ISO, notice ID ARPA-H-SOL-24-105, which is a rolling solicitation that remains active on SAM.gov with a much later administrative closing date in 2029. STREAM itself carries the firm September 14, 2026 cutoff, so treat that as your working deadline regardless of the ISO's longer horizon.

How to Apply

STREAM applications are made through the Scalable Solutions Office ISO on SAM.gov, and the steps are as follows.

First, access the Scalable Solutions solicitation, notice ID ARPA-H-SOL-24-105, on SAM.gov. This solicitation and its attachments provide the full details on eligibility, submission requirements, evaluation criteria, contacts, and the link to apply.

Second, download all documents in the Attachment section, including the ISO document, the Solution Summary template (Appendix A), and the bundle of attachments. Follow the instructions in the ISO document and its associated files when preparing your Solution Summary.

Third, submit your Solution Summary using the link provided in the solicitation documents, at the ARPA-H Solutions site. When prompted, select STREAM from the Solution Summary dropdown list. A sign-in is required to submit, and your summary must be in by September 14, 2026 at 11:59 pm ET.

Fourth, await feedback. Do not begin a full proposal until you hear back from ARPA-H on your Solution Summary.

If you have questions about the opportunity, submit them through the Ask A Question form on the ARPA-H Solutions site, select STREAM from the dropdown, and note that a sign-in is required.

How BW&CO Consulting Supports STREAM Applicants

BW&CO Consulting helps deep-tech, biotech, MedTech, agtech, and dual-use founders pursue non-dilutive federal funding across ARPA-H, NIH, NSF, DoD, NASA, DOE, and other agencies. Because STREAM runs on an Other Transactions ISO rather than a conventional SBIR or STTR grant, it rewards a sharp technical narrative, a credible commercialization and manufacturing story, and a milestone plan that a program manager can act on quickly. If you are weighing a STREAM Solution Summary, we can assess fit against the four technical areas, shape the concept for the ARPA-H model, and prepare a competitive submission ahead of the September 14, 2026 deadline. Reach out to start a fit conversation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ARPA-H STREAM program? STREAM, short for Systems for Tracking and Resilience in Efficient Agricultural-input Management, is an ARPA-H program that funds breakthrough technology to control weeds while reducing herbicide exposure for farmers, farm workers, consumers, and the environment. It was launched by HHS through ARPA-H on August 17, 2026.

Who runs STREAM and what agency funds it? STREAM is run by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), which sits within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The program manager is James Coburn, CAPT.

When is the STREAM application deadline? Solution Summaries that select STREAM are due no later than September 14, 2026 at 11:59 pm ET.

How do I apply to STREAM? You apply by submitting a Solution Summary through the Scalable Solutions Office ISO, notice ID ARPA-H-SOL-24-105, which is posted on SAM.gov. Download the solicitation attachments, prepare your Solution Summary using the provided template, submit it at the ARPA-H Solutions site, and select STREAM from the dropdown.

What are the four STREAM technical areas? The four technical areas are next-generation herbicides and formulations, precision and nonchemical weed control, improved low-cost monitoring of herbicides and associated chemicals, and methods to remove or degrade those chemicals in soil and water. A submission must address at least one of these areas.

How much funding does STREAM provide? STREAM does not publish a fixed award ceiling in its announcement because awards are negotiated per project through Other Transactions. For context, ARPA-H typically supports milestone-driven awards ranging from single millions to tens of millions of dollars, and STREAM advances a broader interagency commitment of more than one billion dollars in farm modernization shared across HHS, USDA, and EPA.

Is STREAM an SBIR or STTR opportunity? No. STREAM is offered through a Mission Office Innovative Solutions Opening and uses Other Transactions and cooperative agreements, not SBIR or STTR grants. This means the application pathway, budgeting, and terms differ from a standard SBIR solicitation.

What funding mechanism does ARPA-H use? ARPA-H primarily uses Other Transactions and cooperative agreements. Other Transactions are flexible, commercial-style agreements that allow scope, milestones, intellectual property, reporting, and payment terms to be negotiated on a per-award basis.

Who is eligible to apply for STREAM? Eligibility is broad and includes companies, startups, small businesses, universities, and nonprofit research organizations, and teaming is encouraged. ARPA-H prioritizes domestic recipients and cannot award funding to entities organized under the laws of a covered foreign country, including Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China.

Can startups and small businesses apply? Yes. Startups and small businesses can apply and are well suited to STREAM's emphasis on bold, early-stage technology, provided they can present a credible technical concept and a plan to reach real-world deployment.

What is a Solution Summary? A Solution Summary is a short initial submission that describes your proposed solution against the program objectives. ARPA-H reviews it and provides feedback before inviting a full proposal, which saves applicants from investing in a full proposal that is not aligned.

What happens after I submit a Solution Summary? After you submit, you wait for feedback from ARPA-H. You should not begin a full proposal until you have heard back, and only encouraged summaries advance to the full proposal stage.

Where do I submit my STREAM application? Solution Summaries are submitted at the ARPA-H Solutions site using the link in the solicitation documents, with STREAM selected from the dropdown. The underlying solicitation, ARPA-H-SOL-24-105, is accessed and downloaded from SAM.gov, and questions go through the Ask A Question form on the same ARPA-H Solutions site.

NIH SBIR Bioethics Research Funding for Startups: 2026 Guide

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

The NIH Highlighted Topic "Strengthening Biomedical Research, Promoting Trust, and Improving Health through Bioethics Research" invites small businesses to develop actionable bioethics tools and approaches across artificial intelligence, research engagement, informed consent, and return of research results. This is not a standalone funding opportunity. It is a Highlighted Topic, which means you apply through the NIH, CDC and FDA Parent SBIR announcement (PA-27-100) or, if you are partnering with a university or other nonprofit, the Parent STTR announcement (PA-27-102). The topic is active from August 14, 2026 through January 12, 2028. Standard NIH SBIR due dates are September 5, 2026 (adjusted to September 8, 2026), January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027. Phase I funding runs up to the current SBA guideline of about $323,090, with several participating Institutes offering waivers of $400,000 or $700,000. Phase II funding runs up to about $2,153,927 under the SBA guideline, with several Institutes offering waivers of $2.5 million or $3 million.

What Is the NIH Bioethics Research Highlighted Topic?

The Highlighted Topic is an area of science that NIH has flagged as a priority for its participating Institutes, Centers, and Offices. It signals to investigators that if they build a competitive application in this space, multiple NIH components are interested in funding it. A Highlighted Topic is not a Notice of Funding Opportunity. There is no separate application package, no dedicated funding number, and no set-aside budget attached to the topic itself. Instead, NIH directs you to submit through a broad parent announcement and to make your project relevant to at least one participating Institute or Center that awards grants.

For a small business, the practical path is the Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100. If your project depends on a formal collaboration with a nonprofit research institution such as a university, the correct vehicle is the Parent STTR announcement PA-27-102. In both programs the award goes to the small business, and both are strong fits for bioethics work because much of the field's expertise sits inside academic centers.

The topic was posted on August 14, 2026 and expires January 12, 2028. Because that window spans more than a year, you can target any of the standard SBIR due dates that fall inside it, applying through whichever parent SBIR announcement is current at your chosen deadline.

How Do You Apply for This Bioethics Topic?

You apply by submitting an SBIR application to PA-27-100 (or an STTR application to PA-27-102) and making your project responsive to the bioethics areas of interest for at least one participating Institute or Center. You do not apply to the Highlighted Topic directly.

A few practical points shape a competitive submission. First, NIH's Center for Scientific Review assigns every application to the most appropriate Institute, so you are not required to name an awarding component in advance. You may request an assignment on the PHS Assignment Request Form, and you are strongly encouraged to contact program staff at the Institute you believe is the best fit before you apply. Second, several of the offices listed in the topic, including the Office of Science Policy, the Office of AIDS Research, the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, and the Office of Data Science Strategy, do not award grants. Your application must map to an Institute or Center that does. Third, because SBIR is a commercialization program, your bioethics work needs a product or service with commercial potential, not a purely academic study. More on that below.

What Kind of Research Is NIH Looking For?

The purpose of this topic is to advance bioethics research projects that are actionable, that build trust, and that improve how bioethical principles are integrated into biomedical and behavioral research. NIH wants work that strengthens science so that research generates evidence-based products communities will adopt more readily. The specific areas of interest fall into five buckets.

Artificial intelligence. NIH is interested in access to and use of AI models and algorithms, maximizing the generalizability of AI, strategies for AI transparency and data privacy, and the integration of digital health research. This is one of the most naturally commercializable areas for a startup, covering audit and transparency tooling, bias and generalizability testing, and privacy-preserving infrastructure.

Research engagement. NIH is interested in approaches for effective community engagement, co-developing research priorities with communities, building and sustaining research trustworthiness, and improving recruitment and access to clinical trials. Platforms and methods that make engagement measurable and repeatable are a fit here.

Informed consent. NIH is interested in strategies and structures for facilitating transparency and autonomy, community approaches to consenting for population-level public health research, and novel forms of consent, including consent for research use of electronic health records, wearables, linked data, and public health data. Consent management systems and dynamic consent tooling map directly to this area.

Return of research results. NIH is interested in approaches for returning aggregate and individual research results, strategies for communicating findings in ways that support health decision-making, and considerations for populations with unique needs or decision-making circumstances. Communication tools and result-delivery systems fit here.

Other cross-cutting issues. NIH also flags data access and sharing, biosafety and biosecurity, and emerging and novel technologies.

Individual Institutes layer their own priorities on top of these buckets. The National Human Genome Research Institute is focused on ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics and genomics. The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering is focused on ethics across the technology development continuum, including AI and machine learning, point-of-care technologies, and re-identifiability risks from imaging data. The National Institute on Aging is focused on autonomy, consent tailored to older adults, and the ethical use of AI in aging populations. The National Institute on Drug Abuse is focused on return of results, stigma reduction, and vulnerable-population protections. The BRAIN Initiative, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the National Eye Institute each bring neurotechnology, neuroimaging, and vision-specific angles. Aligning your project to a specific Institute's stated priorities, rather than to the topic in general, is what separates a fundable application from a vague one.

Which NIH Institutes and Centers Participate?

The Institutes and Centers that award grants under this topic include the National Cancer Institute, the National Eye Institute, the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the National Institute of Nursing Research. The BRAIN Initiative also participates, funding through its associated Institutes.

Several offices are interested in the topic but do not award grants, including the Office of Science Policy, the Office of AIDS Research, the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, and the Office of Data Science Strategy. Applications relevant to these offices must still be assigned to and funded by one of the participating grant-making Institutes or Centers.

How Much Funding Can a Startup Receive?

Funding depends on which Institute your application is assigned to, because budgets vary across NIH components. The default ceiling is the current SBA guideline, which NIH lists at about $323,090 in total costs for Phase I and about $2,153,927 for Phase II. Those figures include direct costs, indirect costs, and fee, and the SBA adjusts them annually, so confirm the current number on the NIH SEED website before you build your budget.

Many Institutes have secured waivers to exceed the SBA guideline. Among the components participating in this bioethics topic, the following Phase I ceilings apply. The National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke offer Phase I budgets up to $700,000. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and the National Institute of Nursing Research offer Phase I budgets up to $400,000. The National Eye Institute and the National Human Genome Research Institute set Phase I at $400,000. The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences follow the standard SBA guideline for Phase I.

On the Phase II side, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke offer Phase II budgets up to $3 million. The National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the National Institute of Nursing Research offer Phase II budgets up to $2.5 million. The National Eye Institute, the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences follow the standard SBA guideline for Phase II.

In every case, NIH expects a budget that is reasonable and appropriate for the work, not a number anchored to the ceiling. Requests at or near a hard cap should be well justified. If you intend to request more than the SBA guideline, contact the participating Institute early in your planning process.

What Is the Timeline and What Are the Deadlines?

The Parent SBIR announcement opened for submissions on August 5, 2026. Its standard due dates are September 5, 2026, January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027, each at 5:00 PM local time of the applicant organization. When a due date falls on a weekend or federal holiday, NIH automatically rolls it to the next business day. September 5, 2026 is a Saturday and September 7 is Labor Day, so the effective first deadline is Tuesday, September 8, 2026. The Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100 itself expires April 6, 2027, and NIH typically reissues its parent announcements, so applicants targeting later cycles should apply through whichever parent SBIR is current at that time.

The review path is predictable. An application submitted for the September 2026 cycle receives scientific merit review in November 2026, advisory council review in January 2027, and an earliest possible start date of April 2027. A January 2027 submission maps to March 2027 review, May 2027 council, and a July 2027 earliest start. Build backward from your target start date, and remember that no late applications are accepted for this announcement.

Project periods are constrained by statute. Phase I awards normally may not exceed 6 months, and Phase II awards normally may not exceed 2 years. NIH also offers two accelerated paths that only apply to NIH components: Fast-Track, which submits and reviews Phase I and Phase II together to reduce the funding gap, and Direct to Phase II, for companies that have already demonstrated feasibility but never received a Phase I for that project.

Who Is Eligible to Apply?

Only United States small business concerns are eligible. To qualify, your company must be organized for profit with a place of business in the United States, must operate primarily in the United States or make a significant contribution to the US economy, and must have no more than 500 employees including affiliates. Ownership must satisfy one of the allowed structures: more than 50 percent directly owned and controlled by US citizens or permanent residents, or majority owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms under the specific limits in the announcement, where no single such firm owns more than 50 percent unless it independently qualifies as a small business.

The Program Director or Principal Investigator must be primarily employed by the small business at the time of award and during the project. For projects with multiple PDs or PIs, at least one must meet this primary employment requirement.

The work-share rules also matter. In SBIR Phase I, the small business normally performs at least two-thirds, or 67 percent, of the research or analytical effort. In SBIR Phase II, the small business normally performs at least one-half, or 50 percent. Consultant and contractual arrangements to third parties are generally capped at the remaining share. If your bioethics project leans heavily on academic collaborators, the STTR announcement PA-27-102 may be the better structural fit, since it allows a nonprofit partner to perform a larger share.

What Registrations Do You Need Before Applying?

You must complete and maintain several registrations before you can submit, and they can take six weeks or more in total, so start immediately. You need an active System for Award Management registration, which issues your Unique Entity Identifier and a CAGE Code. You need to register in the SBA Company Registry, which requires your UEI first. You need an eRA Commons account for your organization, with at least one Signing Official and one Program Director or Principal Investigator, and obtaining an account can take up to two weeks. You need a Grants.gov registration, which depends on an active SAM registration. Every PD or PI must also have an eRA Commons ID and must link a valid ORCID iD to their eRA Commons profile. Failure to complete registrations on time is not an accepted reason for a late submission.

What Are the Key Compliance and Foreign Risk Rules?

Two areas deserve early attention. The first is foreign involvement. Non-US entities and non-US components of US organizations are not eligible to apply. NIH will not issue awards that involve foreign subawards or subcontracts under this announcement, and any application that includes them will be deemed noncompliant and will not be funded. Unfunded international collaborations, funding for foreign consultants, and procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors may still be allowed.

The second is foreign risk disclosure and security review. Applicants under consideration for award must submit the SBA Required Disclosures of Foreign Affiliations or Relationships to Foreign Countries form during the just-in-time process, covering all owners and covered individuals. HHS cannot make an award if the company has an owner or covered individual party to a malign foreign talent recruitment program, a parent company or subsidiary located in the People's Republic of China or another country of concern, or other disqualifying ties described in the announcement. NIH, CDC, and FDA will not provide an opportunity to cure an identified security risk before award, though a denial on security grounds does not bar the company from applying in a later cycle.

A few additional terms are worth knowing. This announcement is clinical trial optional, but some Institutes do not accept clinical trials, so confirm your target component accepts your study design. SBIR recipients may retain data rights for up to 20 years after the award date. Cost sharing is not required.

How Should a Startup Frame a Bioethics Project for SBIR?

This is the point most applicants miss. SBIR is a commercialization program, not a research grant program in the traditional academic sense. Reviewers score significance, investigators, innovation, approach, and environment, and for Phase II and Fast-Track they weigh a Commercialization Plan heavily. A bioethics project that reads like a scholarly study will struggle. A bioethics project framed as a product or service with a clear market, clear customers, and a clear path to revenue will compete.

The most commercializable angles in this topic are the ones that produce software, tooling, or repeatable methods. Examples include AI transparency, audit, and generalizability testing tools; privacy-preserving data infrastructure and de-identification systems; dynamic and electronic consent management platforms, including consent for wearables, EHR data, and linked datasets; community engagement platforms that make trust-building measurable; and return-of-results communication systems tailored to specific populations. If you can name the customer who would pay for your solution and explain how it solves a demonstrated need, you have the spine of a competitive application. If you cannot, the project may be better suited to a non-SBIR mechanism.

How BW&CO Helps

BW&CO helps deep-tech, health, and AI founders match their technology to the right NIH Institute, choose between the SBIR and STTR routes, structure a fundable budget within the correct ceiling, and build the commercialization narrative that NIH reviewers reward. If you are evaluating whether your product fits this bioethics topic, or which of the participating Institutes is the strongest home for your work, we can help you make that call before you invest in a full application.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the NIH Bioethics Research topic a funding opportunity you can apply to directly?

No. It is a Highlighted Topic, not a Notice of Funding Opportunity. There is no separate application package or funding number. You apply through the NIH Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100, or the Parent STTR announcement PA-27-102 if you are partnering with a nonprofit research institution, and you make your project responsive to at least one participating Institute or Center.

What is the deadline to apply?

The standard NIH SBIR due dates are September 5, 2026, January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027, at 5:00 PM local time of the applicant organization. Because September 5, 2026 is a Saturday and September 7 is Labor Day, the effective first deadline is September 8, 2026. The Highlighted Topic remains active through January 12, 2028.

How much SBIR funding can my startup receive?

Phase I runs up to the current SBA guideline of about $323,090, with several participating Institutes offering waivers of $400,000 or $700,000. Phase II runs up to about $2,153,927 under the SBA guideline, with several Institutes offering waivers of $2.5 million or $3 million. The exact ceiling depends on which Institute your application is assigned to.

Who is eligible to apply?

United States small business concerns that are for-profit, have no more than 500 employees including affiliates, meet the ownership rules, and whose Program Director or Principal Investigator is primarily employed by the company at the time of award.

Can universities apply for this topic?

No. The award goes to the small business. A university can participate as a partner through the STTR announcement PA-27-102, or as a subaward or consultant within the SBIR work-share limits, which allow up to about one-third of the effort to third parties in Phase I and up to about one-half in Phase II.

Does my bioethics project need a commercial product?

Yes. SBIR is a commercialization program, so your project needs a product or service with commercial potential and a credible path to market. The strongest fits produce software, tooling, or repeatable methods, such as AI transparency tools, consent management platforms, or return-of-results communication systems.

Which NIH Institutes fund this topic?

Participating grant-making components include NCI, NEI, NHGRI, NHLBI, NIA, NIAAA, NIAID, NIBIB, NIDA, NIDCD, NIDCR, NIEHS, NIMH, NINDS, and NINR, along with the BRAIN Initiative. Several offices are interested but do not award grants, so applications must be assigned to a grant-making Institute or Center.

Do I need to pick an Institute before I apply?

No. NIH's Center for Scientific Review assigns your application to the most appropriate component. You may request an assignment on the PHS Assignment Request Form, and you are strongly encouraged to contact program staff at your target Institute before submitting.

How long does registration take?

Plan for six weeks or more. You need active registrations in SAM, the SBA Company Registry, eRA Commons, and Grants.gov, and each PD or PI needs an eRA Commons ID linked to an ORCID iD. Late registration is not an accepted reason for a late submission.

Can foreign companies or foreign subawards be involved?

No. Only US small business concerns are eligible, and applications that include foreign subawards or subcontracts are deemed noncompliant and will not be funded. Unfunded international collaborations, foreign consultants, and procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors may still be permitted.

NIH Connectedness Interventions SBIR Funding: A Guide for Startups

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

The NIH Highlighted Topic on Interventions to Promote Health by Fostering Connectedness invites small businesses to develop and test interventions that improve health by strengthening people's connections to others, communities, culture, activities, and nature. It is part of the federal Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Chronic Disease Initiative and its Whole-Person-Health approach. This topic is not a standalone funding announcement. Startups pursue funding through the NIH, CDC, and FDA Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100 (R43/R44, Clinical Trial Optional). The topic is active from August 11, 2026 through August 11, 2028. Standard SBIR due dates fall on September 5, January 5, and April 5 of each cycle, and Phase I awards can range from roughly 400,000 dollars to 700,000 dollars depending on the funding Institute.

What Is the NIH Connectedness Interventions Highlighted Topic?

A Highlighted Topic is a signal from NIH about an area of science that its Institutes, Centers, and Offices want to fund. It tells applicants where the agency's scientific interest and money are pointed. It is not a Notice of Funding Opportunity, so there is no separate application form tied to the topic itself.

This particular topic, Interventions to Promote Health by Fostering Connectedness, encourages rigorous research that evaluates connectedness interventions to improve health or reduce risk factors for chronic disease. The scientific premise is that social isolation, loneliness, and poor mental health have risen alongside a widespread chronic disease crisis, and that stronger connections to people, culture, and activities can improve both mental and physical health. Epidemiological evidence links greater social connectedness to improved behavioral, cognitive, cardiovascular, and immune health, and to lower all-cause mortality.

The topic sits inside the Make America Healthy Again initiative and aligns with the NIH MAHA Chronic Disease Initiative, which promotes a Whole-Person-Health approach to chronic disease prevention. It also connects to current federal attention on social prescribing, the 2026 Surgeon General's Warning on the Harms of Screen Use, and the 2026 MAHA ELEVATE initiative for older Medicare recipients.

Which Funding Announcement Do I Actually Apply Through?

You apply through the NIH, CDC, and FDA Parent SBIR announcement, PA-27-100, titled the NIH, CDC and FDA Small Business Innovation Research Grant (Parent SBIR R43/R44 Clinical Trial Optional). This is the application vehicle for the connectedness topic.

When you submit, you do not need to name a specific Institute, but you are encouraged to identify the Institute or Center whose mission best matches your work and to contact its program staff before applying. NIH's Center for Scientific Review assigns each application to the most appropriate participating component.

A few companion announcements matter depending on your project:

• PA-27-100 is the SBIR route (R43 Phase I, R44 Phase II), where the small business does most of the work.

• PA-27-102 is the STTR route (R41 Phase I, R42 Phase II), used when your project depends on a formal collaboration with a nonprofit research institution such as a university. Connectedness research often involves academic or clinical partners, so the STTR route is worth evaluating.

• PA-27-101 is the standalone SBIR Phase II announcement, including Phase IIB Strategic Breakthrough applications.

• PAR-27-098 is the SB1 Commercialization Readiness Program.

If PA-27-100 expires before you are ready to apply, use whichever Parent SBIR announcement is active at that time. The connectedness topic remains valid through August 11, 2028, while PA-27-100 itself carries an expiration date of April 6, 2027 and is expected to be reissued.

Is My Startup Eligible?

To apply, your company must be a United States small business concern that meets all of the following at the time of a Phase I or Phase II award:

• Organized for profit with a place of business in the United States.

• No more than 500 employees, including affiliates.

• More than 50 percent directly owned and controlled by United States citizens or permanent residents, or by other qualifying United States small businesses, or majority owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms (with the condition that no single such firm owns more than 50 percent unless it independently qualifies as a United States owned small business).

For SBIR awards, the Program Director or Principal Investigator must be primarily employed by the small business at the time of award and during the project. In projects with multiple PIs, at least one must meet this employment requirement. If you take the STTR route instead, the PI may be primarily employed by either the small business or the nonprofit research partner.

Non United States entities are not eligible, and NIH will not issue awards that involve foreign subawards or subcontracts under this announcement. Unfunded international collaborations, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique supplies from foreign vendors may still be allowed.

What Registrations Do I Need, and How Long Do They Take?

Plan for registration to take six weeks or more, and start early, because a late registration is never accepted as an excuse for a missed deadline. You need active registrations in:

• System for Award Management (SAM), which includes a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code and a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI).

• SBA Company Registry.

• eRA Commons, with at least one Signing Official and at least one PI account.

• Grants.gov.

Each PI must have an eRA Commons ID and a linked ORCID iD. The same UEI must be used across all systems and on the application.

What Kind of Projects Is NIH Looking For?

Connectedness can take many forms, including connections with people, communities, history, traditions, hobbies, sports, the arts, or nature. Interventions may be tested as adjuncts to healthcare or as stand-alone interventions in non-medical settings.

NIH strongly encourages projects that:

• Specify a clear conceptual model that identifies the hypothesized pathways between connectedness and health outcomes.

• Use validated measures of connectedness and health outcomes wherever possible, such as those in the PhenX Toolkit.

• Address the multi-level factors that make connections possible and sustainable, for example providing transportation so urban youth can reach existing green spaces.

• Involve collaboration with organizations that can actually implement or deliver the intervention if it proves effective.

• Include a rigorous, sufficiently powered study design that accounts for the expected correlation of outcomes within clusters such as families, schools, clinics, or neighborhoods.

For a startup, the practical takeaway is that a competitive application pairs a strong commercial concept with a real conceptual model, validated measurement, a credible delivery partner, and a study design that will hold up under peer review.

Which NIH Institutes and Centers Are Funding This Topic?

Several Institutes and Centers participate, each with its own angle. Matching your intervention to the right one improves your odds. Your application must be relevant to at least one of the awarding Institutes or Centers below. Two offices, the Office of Disease Prevention (ODP) and the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), signal interest but do not award grants themselves.

• National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH): mind and body approaches that promote mental, emotional, and behavioral health, using feasibility, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, mechanistic, pragmatic, or community-based designs, including health information technology and partnerships with schools, health systems, and justice systems.

• National Cancer Institute (NCI): connectedness and cancer control outcomes, including risk behaviors, screening, treatment decision-making, symptom management, and patient and caregiver health, plus the effect of the online and social media environment on connectedness.

• National Eye Institute (NEI): the intersection of visual impairment, social isolation, and wellness, including accessibility technologies and care-delivery models for people experiencing vision loss.

• National Institute on Aging (NIA): how connectedness affects the physical, cognitive, social, and emotional health of people in midlife and older adulthood, including isolation among older adults aging in place, kinless individuals, and dementia caregivers, and the role of the built environment.

• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA): the role of connectedness in preventing and treating alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorder across the lifespan, including screening, brief interventions, and recovery outcomes.

• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): social connectedness and loneliness as levers to prevent or treat substance use disorders and support recovery, with strong emphasis on stakeholder engagement.

• National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): connectedness and risk for mental illness, social prescribing including digital approaches, and connectedness among people living with HIV.

• National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD): community-engaged connectedness interventions that improve health and reduce risk among populations experiencing health disparities.

• National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR): interventions that promote mental well-being through social, cultural, or environmental connectedness, including school-based settings and the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings.

How Much Funding Can My Startup Receive?

Budget ceilings vary by Institute. Phase I supports a feasibility study and normally runs up to six months. Phase II continues research and development toward commercialization and normally runs up to two years. Total funding support includes direct costs, indirect costs, and fee.

For the Institutes participating in this topic, the Phase I and Phase II guidelines are:

• National Cancer Institute: Phase I up to 700,000 dollars, Phase II up to 2,500,000 dollars.

• National Institute on Aging: Phase I up to 700,000 dollars, Phase II up to 3,000,000 dollars.

• National Institute of Mental Health: Phase I up to 700,000 dollars, Phase II up to 3,000,000 dollars.

• National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health: Phase I up to 700,000 dollars, Phase II follows the SBA guideline.

• National Institute on Drug Abuse: Phase I up to 400,000 dollars, Phase II up to 3,000,000 dollars.

• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Phase I up to 400,000 dollars, Phase II up to 2,500,000 dollars.

• National Institute of Nursing Research: Phase I up to 400,000 dollars, Phase II up to 2,500,000 dollars.

• National Eye Institute: Phase I up to 400,000 dollars, Phase II follows the SBA guideline.

• National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities: both phases follow the SBA guideline.

Where an Institute follows the SBA guideline, the ceiling is the standard SBA hard cap, which the Small Business Administration adjusts annually, so confirm the current figure before you budget. In all cases, propose a budget that is reasonable for the work. If you need to request more than the SBA guideline, contact the relevant Institute early, since some Institutes can exceed standard amounts for approved topics.

What Is the Timeline and What Are the Deadlines?

PA-27-100 was posted on May 28, 2026, with an earliest submission date of August 5, 2026. The standard application due dates are:

• September 5, 2026, with scientific merit review around November 2026, advisory council review around January 2027, and earliest start around April 2027.

• January 5, 2027, with review around March 2027, council around May 2027, and earliest start around July 2027.

• April 5, 2027, with review around July 2027, council around August 2027, and earliest start around December 2027.

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of the applicant organization. When a due date falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the deadline moves to the next business day. No late applications are accepted.

Two expiration dates matter. The Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100 expires April 6, 2027, and the connectedness Highlighted Topic expires August 11, 2028. If you apply after PA-27-100 expires, use the active Parent SBIR announcement at that time and align your project with the connectedness topic while it remains open.

What Are the SBIR Phases, and Which One Fits My Startup?

• Phase I establishes the technical merit and feasibility of your idea. It is the entry point for most companies.

• Phase II continues research and development to advance toward commercialization, and is submitted as a renewal of your Phase I project.

• Direct to Phase II (NIH only) is available if you have already demonstrated feasibility but never held a Phase I SBIR or STTR for that project.

• Fast-Track (NIH only) lets you submit and review Phase I and Phase II together to reduce the funding gap between them.

After Phase II, NIH expects you to fully commercialize the product using non-SBIR and non-STTR funds, whether federal or private.

How Is the Research Effort Split Between My Company and Partners?

In Phase I, the small business normally performs at least two-thirds (67 percent) of the research or analytical effort, and outside consultants and contracts generally account for no more than 33 percent of the total. In Phase II, the small business normally performs at least half (50 percent), with outside arrangements generally capped at 50 percent. Deviations can be considered case by case with written approval. If a formal university or nonprofit collaboration is central to your project, the STTR route under PA-27-102 may fit better.

Do Clinical Trials Fit This Topic?

PA-27-100 is Clinical Trial Optional, meaning it accepts applications that do or do not propose clinical trials. Many connectedness interventions will involve a clinical trial. The Institutes participating in this topic accept clinical trials, so a well-designed trial is on the table. If you propose one, you must include a two-page Regulatory Plan attachment, and you may not submit that attachment if your project does not include a clinical trial.

What Do Reviewers Evaluate?

Peer reviewers score five criteria and combine them into an overall impact score:

• Significance: does the product or service address an important problem or unmet need, and does it have commercial potential.

• Investigators: are the team and any partners suited to complete and eventually commercialize the work.

• Innovation: does the solution shift current practice and hold a real competitive advantage.

• Approach: are the aims, methods, milestones, and study design sound and appropriate for the stage.

• Environment: does the business and scientific environment support success and commercialization.

For Phase II and Fast-Track applications, reviewers also weigh a Commercialization Plan covering the market opportunity, barriers such as regulatory approval and reimbursement, a funding path, the management team, and how the project differs from or complements existing private-sector activity.

What Restrictions Should I Know About?

• Foreign entities are not eligible, and foreign subawards or subcontracts make an application non-compliant under this announcement.

• Applicants under consideration for award must complete foreign relationship disclosures during the Just-in-Time process, and awards can be denied for defined national security risks with no opportunity to cure before award.

• Applications may not simultaneously duplicate the same research focus across multiple HHS opportunities.

• SBIR recipients may retain rights to data generated under the award for up to 20 years.

How BW&CO Helps

BW&CO helps deep-tech and health-focused founders decide whether the SBIR or STTR route fits, identify the right Institute and program contact, sharpen the conceptual model and study design that reviewers reward, and build a Commercialization Plan that holds up under scrutiny. If you are weighing a connectedness intervention against the September or January cycle, the earlier we start, the more room you have to register, refine, and position the application.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the connectedness Highlighted Topic a grant I can apply to directly? No. It is a statement of NIH scientific interest, not a Notice of Funding Opportunity. You apply through the Parent SBIR announcement PA-27-100 and align your project with the topic.

What is the funding announcement number I should use? PA-27-100 for SBIR, or PA-27-102 for STTR if your project depends on a formal nonprofit or university collaboration.

When are applications due? Standard due dates are September 5, 2026, January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027, all by 5:00 PM local time of the applicant organization.

How much money can a startup receive? Phase I generally ranges from 400,000 dollars to 700,000 dollars and Phase II from about 2,500,000 dollars to 3,000,000 dollars, depending on the funding Institute. Some Institutes follow the standard SBA hard cap, which adjusts annually.

Who is eligible? United States small business concerns with 500 or fewer employees that meet the ownership rules, with a PI primarily employed by the small business for SBIR awards.

Which Institutes fund this topic? NCCIH, NCI, NEI, NIA, NIAAA, NIDA, NIMH, NIMHD, and NINR award grants for this topic. ODP and OBSSR signal interest but do not award grants.

Can I propose a clinical trial? Yes. PA-27-100 is Clinical Trial Optional, and the participating Institutes accept clinical trials. Clinical trial applications must include a Regulatory Plan attachment.

How long do registrations take? Six weeks or more. Complete SAM, UEI, SBA Company Registry, eRA Commons, and Grants.gov well ahead of your target due date.

What is the difference between SBIR and STTR here? SBIR (PA-27-100) requires the small business to perform most of the work. STTR (PA-27-102) is built around a formal collaboration with a nonprofit research institution and allows the PI to be employed by either the company or the partner.

How long is the topic open? The Highlighted Topic is active from August 11, 2026 through August 11, 2028. Apply through whichever Parent SBIR announcement is active at your time of submission.

NIH SBIR Funding for Time-Sensitive Environmental Health and Disaster Research: What Startups Need to Know

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

NIH has flagged time-sensitive environmental health research as a current priority through a Highlighted Topic titled "Time-Sensitive Research Opportunities in Environmental Health Sciences" (posted August 10, 2026, active through August 10, 2028). This topic is not itself a funding opportunity, so small businesses cannot apply to it directly. Instead, a U.S. small business applies through the NIH Parent SBIR announcement, PA-27-100, and writes its research aims to match what the topic describes: capturing exposure and health data during the narrow window that follows a disaster or an emerging environmental threat. The next Parent SBIR deadline is September 5, 2026, which falls on a Saturday ahead of Labor Day and therefore moves to Tuesday, September 8, 2026. Phase I awards run up to roughly $323,090 and Phase II awards up to roughly $2,153,927 under current SBA guidelines, with several participating institutes offering higher caps.

What is the "Time-Sensitive Research Opportunities in Environmental Health Sciences" topic?

It is an NIH Highlighted Topic, which is a signal from a group of NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices that they want to receive applications in a specific area of science. It is not a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), and it does not have its own application package, budget, or deadline. NIH is explicit on this point: applicants pursue the topic by applying through an appropriate NIH Parent Funding Announcement or another broad opportunity on Grants.gov.

The topic exists because disasters and emerging environmental threats create a short, often unpredictable window in which exposure and health data can be collected. Once that window closes, the scientific value is lost. NIH wants research that moves fast enough to capture that information and that lays the groundwork for later, longer-term analysis of how those exposures affect health. A strong application makes two things obvious: that the triggering event was genuinely unforeseen, and that the proposed study is both scientifically valuable and feasible inside that limited window.

For a small business, the practical takeaway is simple. If your technology or study can capture exposure, biospecimen, or health data quickly after a natural or human-made disaster, or in response to an emerging environmental public health threat inside the United States, this topic tells you that three parts of NIH are actively looking for that work right now. You reach them through the Parent SBIR.

How does a startup actually apply for this?

You apply through the NIH, CDC, and FDA Parent SBIR announcement, PA-27-100 ("Parent SBIR [R43/R44] Clinical Trial Optional"). This is the vehicle that turns the Highlighted Topic into a fundable application for a for-profit small business.

The workflow looks like this. You confirm your company is an eligible U.S. small business concern, you register in the required federal systems, you build your Phase I feasibility study (or a Direct to Phase II or Fast-Track application) around the time-sensitive environmental health science described in the topic, and you submit through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace, or an institutional system-to-system solution. In your application you signal fit with the topic and, where useful, name the most appropriate Institute on the assignment request form. NIH's Center for Scientific Review then assigns your application to the best-fit participating component.

If your project depends on a formal partnership with a university or other nonprofit research institution, the companion STTR announcement, PA-27-102, is the better route. Both SBIR and STTR make the award to the small business. Note also that the Highlighted Topic stays open until August 10, 2028, while PA-27-100 itself expires April 6, 2027, so applicants submitting after that date should apply through whatever reissued Parent SBIR announcement is current at that time.

What kind of research is NIH looking for?

Three parts of NIH are participating in this topic, and each brings a distinct angle. Reading their interests closely is the difference between a fundable application and a near miss.

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the anchor. NIEHS wants studies that clarify the relationship between environmental exposure and health outcomes. That includes the immediate and short-term health effects that follow a disaster, methods for measuring and characterizing human exposure to environmental hazards, work that helps understand how contaminants move and predict where exposure will occur, and approaches to preventing or reducing exposure during a disaster event, including remediation technologies relevant to Superfund-type contamination. NIEHS specifically encourages exploratory and developmental work with clear time-sensitivity, and it will treat studies that use animals as stand-ins for human exposure as lower priority. Its Superfund Research Program is interested where the work applies to hazardous waste sites. Its Workers Training Program is not part of this topic. Scientific contact: Toccara Chamberlain, M.A., toccara.chamberlain@nih.gov.

The National Institute on Aging (NIA) is interested in the same time-sensitive framing but focused on older adults, whose bodies are less able to absorb the stress of a disaster and who often depend on medication, caregivers, and health services that a disaster can disrupt. NIA wants early exposure and health data captured in older populations, including people in assisted living, nursing homes, rural areas, and other at-risk settings, to understand effects on functional status, cognition, cardiometabolic health, mobility, resilience, and progression toward Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Applications should point toward modifiable risk and protective factors that can inform prevention, preparedness, and recovery. Scientific contacts: Richard Kwok, PhD, richard.kwok@nih.gov, and Emerald Nguyen, PhD, emerald.nguyen@nih.gov.

The Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH) focuses on how these unexpected events uniquely affect the health of women and girls. ORWH prioritizes rapid data and biospecimen collection that captures women's distinct health risks, including chronic disease management, reproductive and maternal health, and mental health, with attention to differences across life stages and to gaps in disaster preparedness for women with limited resources. One important detail: ORWH does not award grants directly, so any application it co-funds must still be relevant to the mission of at least one of the awarding Institutes or Centers in the topic. Scientific contact: Regine A. Douthard, M.D., M.P.H, orwhinfo@mail.nih.gov.

Across all three, the common thread is speed with scientific purpose. Reviewers and program staff want to see that the event was genuinely unforeseen, that the collection window is real, that the study is feasible inside it, and that the short-term data will feed longer-term understanding of exposure and health.

Who is eligible to apply?

Only a United States small business concern (SBC) can apply. To qualify, your company must be organized for profit with a place of business in the United States, and it must operate primarily in the U.S. or make a significant contribution to the U.S. economy. It must have no more than 500 employees, including affiliates. Ownership must meet one of two tests: either more than 50 percent owned and controlled by U.S. citizens or permanent residents (directly, or through other qualifying U.S.-owned businesses), or more than 50 percent owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms, with no single such firm owning more than 50 percent.

For an SBIR award, the Program Director or Principal Investigator must have their primary employment with the small business at the time of award and throughout the project. Foreign organizations and foreign components of U.S. organizations cannot apply, and NIH will not make awards under this announcement that involve foreign subawards or subcontracts. Companies also need to be aware of the foreign-risk and security screening that applies before award, including required disclosure of foreign affiliations for owners and covered individuals.

How much funding is available?

The dollar amount depends on which Institute your application is assigned to. The current SBA total-cost guidelines, which set the ceiling agencies can award without a waiver, are Phase I up to $323,090 and Phase II up to $2,153,927 as of April 2026. NIEHS, the lead Institute for this topic, uses those SBA guideline amounts for both phases, so an environmental exposure study routed to NIEHS would generally target up to about $323,090 for Phase I and up to about $2,153,927 for Phase II.

If your project skews toward aging and is assigned to NIA, the caps are higher: up to $700,000 for Phase I and up to $3,000,000 for Phase II. For applications ORWH co-funds, the Phase II reference is $2,500,000, though ORWH itself does not make the award. These are guideline amounts, and NIH may exceed them for approved waiver topics. If you plan to request more than the SBA guideline, NIH strongly encourages you to contact the relevant Institute early. No cost sharing is required, and SBIR does not take equity.

There is one work-share rule that startups sometimes overlook and that shapes the budget. In Phase I, the small business normally performs at least two-thirds (about 67 percent) of the research or analytical effort, so consultants and subcontractors together are generally capped near 33 percent. In Phase II, the small business normally performs at least half (50 percent), so outside effort is generally capped near 50 percent. Deviations are possible but must be approved in writing.

What is the timeline and what are the deadlines?

The Parent SBIR (PA-27-100) was posted May 28, 2026, opened for submission on August 5, 2026, and carries three standard due dates before it expires on April 6, 2027:

• September 5, 2026, for the first cycle. Because September 5 is a Saturday and Labor Day falls on Monday, September 7, NIH's weekend and holiday policy moves the effective deadline to Tuesday, September 8, 2026. Confirm the displayed date in ASSIST or Grants.gov before you submit.

• January 5, 2027, for the second cycle.

• April 5, 2027, for the third cycle.

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of the applicant organization, and NIH does not accept late applications. After submission, an application moves through scientific merit review, then Advisory Council review, then the earliest possible start date. For the September 2026 cycle, that path runs through review in November 2026, Council in January 2027, and an earliest start around April 2027. The later cycles follow the same rhythm a few months out.

Because registration in SAM.gov, eRA Commons, Grants.gov, and the SBA Company Registry can take six weeks or longer, the practical deadline for a first-time applicant is well before the submission date. Start the registrations now if you have not.

What are the funding phases?

Phase I establishes technical merit and feasibility and normally runs up to six months. Phase II continues the research and development toward commercialization and normally runs up to two years. NIH also offers two accelerated paths that other agencies do not. Direct to Phase II lets a company that has already demonstrated feasibility, without ever holding a Phase I SBIR or STTR for that project, apply straight into Phase II. Fast-Track lets you submit and review Phase I and Phase II together to reduce the funding gap between them. After Phase II, NIH expects the company to commercialize using non-SBIR funds, whether private capital, sales, licensing, or other federal sources.

Is this a good fit for my company?

This topic is a strong fit if your company works on environmental exposure measurement, sensing, remediation, biomonitoring, rapid data or biospecimen collection, or health surveillance tied to disasters and emerging environmental threats, and if you can credibly move fast enough to capture data inside the event window. It fits especially well for teams building tools or study capabilities relevant to older adults or to the distinct health needs of women and girls, given NIA's and ORWH's participation. It is a weaker fit if your work has no time-sensitive collection element, relies mainly on animal surrogates for human exposure, or cannot meet the small business and PI employment rules. If you are unsure which Institute fits or whether SBIR or STTR is the right route, that is exactly the kind of question worth resolving before you write a single specific aim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I apply directly to the environmental health Highlighted Topic?
No. It is not a funding opportunity and has no application package. You apply through the NIH Parent SBIR announcement, PA-27-100, and align your research aims with the topic so it routes to NIEHS, NIA, or ORWH.

What is the next deadline?
The next Parent SBIR standard due date is September 5, 2026. That date is a Saturday just before Labor Day, so under NIH policy the effective deadline moves to Tuesday, September 8, 2026. The following cycles are January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027.

How much money can a startup receive?
Under current SBA guidelines, Phase I runs up to about $323,090 and Phase II up to about $2,153,927. NIEHS uses those guideline amounts. NIA offers higher caps of up to $700,000 for Phase I and up to $3,000,000 for Phase II. The exact ceiling depends on the Institute your application is assigned to.

Who is eligible?
A U.S. small business concern with no more than 500 employees, organized for profit, and meeting NIH's ownership tests. For SBIR, the Principal Investigator's primary employment must be with the small business.

Do I need a university partner?
Not for SBIR. If your project depends on a formal collaboration with a university or nonprofit research institution, use the companion STTR announcement, PA-27-102, instead. In both programs the award goes to the small business.

What kind of research does NIH want here?
Time-sensitive studies that capture exposure and health data during the short window after a natural or human-made disaster or an emerging environmental threat in the United States, including short-term health effects, exposure measurement, contaminant movement, remediation, effects on older adults, and effects on women and girls.

Is the SBIR program still funded?
Yes. The SBIR and STTR programs were reauthorized in April 2026 and are currently authorized through September 30, 2031.

How long does it take to get funded?
Plan on several months from submission to award. For the September 2026 cycle, scientific review is expected in November 2026, Council review in January 2027, and the earliest start date around April 2027.

What if I miss the September deadline?
The Parent SBIR has additional standard due dates on January 5, 2027, and April 5, 2027. The Highlighted Topic itself stays active through August 10, 2028, so the priority persists across cycles, though the specific Parent SBIR announcement is reissued periodically.

ERDC Broad Agency Announcement (W912HZ26S0001): The Complete Guide for Startups and Small Businesses

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Broad Agency Announcement, solicitation number W912HZ26S0001, is a continuously open funding pathway that lets startups, small businesses, universities, and nonprofits propose basic and applied research across seven ERDC laboratories. It covers a wide range of technical areas including AI and machine learning, cybersecurity, high performance computing, advanced manufacturing, sensing and instrumentation, autonomous systems, materials and structures, infrastructure, environmental technologies, and geospatial technologies. There is no fixed submission deadline and no set per-award dollar ceiling. You start with a short five-page pre-proposal, and ERDC responds within 60 days on whether to invite a full proposal. Awards can take the form of a procurement contract, a grant, or a cooperative agreement.

What is the ERDC Broad Agency Announcement?

The ERDC Broad Agency Announcement is a standing solicitation issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center under the authority of FAR 35.016. A Broad Agency Announcement, or BAA, is a mechanism the government uses to solicit proposals for basic and applied research, and for that part of development not tied to a specific system or hardware procurement. In plain terms, ERDC is inviting outside organizations to bring forward research ideas that advance the state of the art or increase scientific and technical knowledge in the areas ERDC cares about.

To be eligible for award, your proposed work needs to fall into one of these categories: basic research, applied research, advanced technology development not tied to a specific system or hardware, or demonstration and validation. Work aimed at building a specific product or piece of hardware for direct government use generally does not fit the BAA and would belong on a different acquisition pathway.

This is a science and research vehicle, not a services or product procurement, and understanding that distinction is the single most important thing to get right before you invest time in a submission.

Who is the ERDC BAA for?

ERDC explicitly encourages small business participation. The solicitation specifically invites small business concerns, women-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, HUBZone small businesses, firms in the SBA 8(a) program, and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses to submit research proposals. It also encourages proposals from Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions.

In practice the applicant pool skews roughly half universities and half small businesses. Some research areas lean toward earlier-stage work that naturally draws academic teams, but there is substantial room for commercial small businesses, especially those with genuine research and development depth and a technology that maps cleanly to an ERDC mission area.

Federal facilities and organizations cannot compete. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers and other government entities face direct competition limitations and must clear a high bar to be eligible, with the burden of proving eligibility resting entirely on them.

If your company is doing real R&D in a field ERDC works in, you are very likely in the intended audience.

What research areas does the ERDC BAA cover?

ERDC organizes its research interests across seven laboratories, each with its own set of numbered topic areas. When you submit, you reference the specific topic number, for example CHL-1, CRREL-10, or CERL-15.

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL) covers coastal and inland hydraulics, hydrodynamics, sediment transport, dredging, navigation channels, groundwater, hydrology, coastal structures, nature-based coastal resilience, and marine transportation technologies.

Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL) covers soil and rock mechanics, pavements, vehicle mobility, earthquake engineering, geophysics, protective and survivable structures, concrete and construction materials, projectile penetration, bridge and railroad technology, computational structural mechanics, and advanced maneuver technologies.

Environmental Laboratory (EL) covers environmental sensing, hazardous waste characterization and treatment, water quality and contaminant modeling, emerging contaminants, dredged material management, wetlands and ecological restoration, invasive and endangered species management, systems biology and bioinformatics, ecological modeling, and decision analysis.

Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) covers computational science and engineering, software engineering and informatics, high performance computing, cybersecurity, high performance data analytics, additive manufacturing enabled by HPC, artificial intelligence and machine learning for materials discovery, and edge computing.

Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) covers additive construction, critical infrastructure protection, innovative construction materials, energy efficiency and energy security, water resilience, autonomous robotic solutions for engineer operations, geopolymers, fiber reinforced polymers, structural health monitoring, and installation infrastructure management.

Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) covers signature physics, terrestrial and cryospheric science, biogeochemical processes, environmental fate and transport, force projection and sustainment, cold regions infrastructure, geospatial water resources applications, and hydrology and hydraulics.

Geospatial Research Laboratory (GRL) covers photon-counting LIDAR, photogrammetry, intelligent spatiotemporal analytics, assured position, navigation and timing in GPS-denied environments, advanced terrain analytics, and cyber geospatial science.

Across all seven labs there are well over one hundred specific topic areas, so the practical first step is identifying which single topic your technology best fits.

How much funding can you get through the ERDC BAA?

The ERDC BAA does not publish a fixed per-award dollar ceiling. This is a meaningful difference from SBIR and STTR, which cap awards at set phase amounts. Under the BAA, the size of an award is scoped to the proposed effort and is constrained by the funding ERDC has available for that research area at the time.

There are two dollar thresholds worth knowing. First, for proposed awards exceeding $900,000, large businesses and nonprofits (including educational institutions) must submit a formal small business subcontracting plan. Small businesses are exempt from that requirement. Second, when the proposed value exceeds $100,000, an SF-LLL disclosure of lobbying activities is required.

The type of award affects fee. Procurement contracts can include a proposed fee or profit. Grants and cooperative agreements do not allow any fee or profit. Cost realism and the availability of funds are part of how proposals are evaluated, so your budget needs to be detailed, defensible, and proportionate to the work.

What is the ERDC BAA timeline and deadline?

There is no single deadline. This BAA is open on a rolling basis and remains in effect until it is superseded by a newer edition. The current edition is dated April 2026 and supersedes all previous editions. You can submit a pre-proposal at any time.

After you submit a pre-proposal, ERDC will respond within 60 days of receipt. The response either encourages you to submit a full proposal or advises you that the pre-proposal did not receive a favorable review. Pre-proposals that lack sufficient scientific merit, that are not relevant to Army needs, or that fall in areas where funds are not expected to be available may be declined.

If you are proposing support for a conference or symposium rather than research, that proposal should be submitted at least six months before the event.

The rolling nature is an advantage. You are not racing a fixed clock, and you can time your submission around your own readiness and around informal conversations with ERDC about fit.

How do you apply to the ERDC BAA?

The process has two stages: a pre-proposal first, then a full proposal by invitation only.

Before you submit anything, your organization must be registered and active in the System for Award Management at sam.gov. This is a prerequisite, and it can take time, so start it early if you are not already registered.

Stage one is the pre-proposal, which ERDC treats as a white paper. Every initial submission under this BAA is considered a pre-proposal. You submit it electronically through the ERDCWERX portal at erdcwerx.org. ERDC reviews it and, if the concept is promising, invites a full proposal.

Stage two is the full proposal, which you only prepare after receiving an invitation directly from the ERDC Contracting Office. Full proposals are submitted by email to the specific laboratory your topic falls under, using the contact and address provided in your invitation. Proposals should never be sent directly to technical or lab personnel.

What goes in an ERDC BAA pre-proposal?

The pre-proposal has a firm five-page limit, and it may only be submitted under one specific topic area. It must reference the topic number for that research area. The pre-proposal should include a descriptive title, the submitting organization's name and address including email, the principal investigator's name and phone number, the project duration, a statement of objectives or the working hypothesis, one or more paragraphs on the technical approach, one or more paragraphs on the potential military or civil payoffs to the Corps of Engineers, and a one-page curriculum vitae for the principal investigator.

Separately, you include a one-page executive summary that describes the background, scope of work, deliverables, and total proposed price. No cost breakdown is required in this summary, and the summary must not contain any sensitive or proprietary data. Importantly, this one-page executive summary does not count against the five-page limit.

If you intend to seek a grant or cooperative agreement rather than a contract, you also describe how the research supports or stimulates a public purpose.

What goes in an ERDC BAA full proposal?

A full proposal has a technical portion and a cost portion.

The technical portion covers the background and objectives, the technical approach, the proposed level of effort, and the anticipated results and deliverables. It includes a recommended Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan, biographical information and recent publications for key personnel, the names of any other agencies you have submitted the same proposal to, a description of your organization, and past performance information for at least three customers you have performed similar work for in the last three years. You also include a revised one-page executive summary. If you are pursuing a grant or cooperative agreement, you add a data management plan.

The cost portion is a detailed cost estimate broken out by element of cost and by task. It covers direct labor by discipline, fringe benefits, itemized equipment, expendable supplies, travel, subcontracts, other direct costs, and indirect cost rates and bases. Proposals should also address expected use of DoD High Performance Computing Center systems where relevant.

How are ERDC BAA proposals evaluated?

Pre-proposals get an initial technical review against three factors: the overall scientific and technical merit, the potential contribution to the ERDC mission, and available funding.

Full proposals go through scientific peer review against a broader set of criteria. Scientific and technical merit is the most important factor. The remaining factors are of equal importance to one another and, when combined, are significantly more important than cost. Those factors are the contribution to the ERDC and DoD mission, the offeror's capabilities and facilities, the qualifications of the principal investigator and key personnel, the reasonableness and realism of proposed costs along with the availability of funds, past performance, and a subcontracting plan where one is required.

A useful takeaway: this is a merit-driven, science-first evaluation, not a lowest-price competition. A strong technical concept from a credible team carries the most weight.

What types of awards can result from the ERDC BAA?

The BAA lets you propose one of three instruments, though the final instrument can change through negotiation based on the nature of the work.

A procurement contract is used when the principal purpose is to acquire research services for the direct benefit of the government. Contracts can be cost-reimbursable, which suits research where direction may shift as results come in, or fixed-price, which suits well-defined efforts with predictable costs. Contracts can include a fee.

A grant is used when the principal purpose is to transfer value to support or stimulate a public purpose, with no substantial government involvement expected and no fee or profit allowed.

A cooperative agreement is similar to a grant but anticipates substantial involvement between the government and the recipient, and it also allows no fee or profit.

How is the ERDC BAA different from SBIR and STTR?

If you have looked at SBIR or STTR, the ERDC BAA will feel both familiar and different. Both are non-dilutive federal funding, but the BAA is continuously open rather than tied to solicitation cycles, it has no phase-based dollar caps, and it is evaluated as basic and applied research rather than as a commercialization-staged program. It rewards genuine research depth and a clear tie to an ERDC mission area. For many deep-tech companies, the two pathways are complementary, and the right move is to map your technology against both.

How BW&CO helps you pursue the ERDC BAA

BW&CO works with deep-tech, defense, and dual-use founders to identify the right non-dilutive funding pathways and to build competitive submissions. For the ERDC BAA that means pinpointing the single best-fit topic area across the seven laboratories, pressure-testing whether your work reads as fundable research rather than product development, shaping the pre-proposal and executive summary, and preparing you for the full proposal stage if you are invited. If the ERDC BAA looks like a potential fit for your technology, contact BW&CO to talk through it.

FAQ SECTION WITH SCHEMA

Is the ERDC BAA open to small businesses and startups?
Yes. ERDC explicitly encourages small businesses, women-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, HUBZone firms, 8(a) participants, and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses to submit research proposals. The applicant pool is roughly half small businesses and half universities.

Is there a deadline for the ERDC BAA?
No. The BAA is continuously open and remains in effect until superseded. The current edition is dated April 2026. You can submit a pre-proposal at any time, and ERDC responds within 60 days.

How much money can you receive through the ERDC BAA?
There is no published per-award dollar ceiling. Award size is scoped to the proposed research effort and depends on available funding. Awards above $900,000 require a subcontracting plan from large businesses and nonprofits, while small businesses are exempt.

What is the ERDC BAA solicitation number?
The solicitation number is W912HZ26S0001.

How do you apply to the ERDC BAA?
You must be registered and active in SAM at sam.gov, then submit a five-page pre-proposal electronically through erdcwerx.org under one specific topic area. If ERDC invites you, you submit a full proposal to the relevant laboratory by email.

How long can an ERDC BAA pre-proposal be?
The pre-proposal is limited to five pages under a single topic area, plus a separate one-page executive summary that does not count against the five-page limit.

What types of awards can the ERDC BAA result in?
A procurement contract, a grant, or a cooperative agreement. Grants and cooperative agreements do not allow fee or profit, while procurement contracts can include a fee.

How are ERDC BAA proposals scored?
Scientific and technical merit is the most important factor, followed by mission contribution, offeror capabilities, personnel qualifications, cost realism and fund availability, and past performance. All non-cost factors combined outweigh cost.

ERDC BOTAA 25-01: The Army's Continuously Open Prototype Funding Path for Deep-Tech Startups

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

ERDC BOTAA 25-01 is a Broad Other Transaction Authority Announcement issued in October 2024 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). It uses Other Transaction (OT) authority under 10 U.S.C. 4022 to fund prototype projects in two broad domains: Military Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems. It is continuously open, meaning there is no fixed deadline. Companies submit a short white paper (three pages or less) against any focus area through ERDCWERX, and the government typically responds with a selection decision within 60 to 90 days. Selected companies may be invited to pitch, demonstrate, or submit a full proposal through a Request for Prototype Proposal. There is no published dollar ceiling, and successful prototypes can lead directly to a noncompetitive follow-on production award. This mechanism is especially attractive to nontraditional defense contractors and small businesses, because it sits outside the Federal Acquisition Regulation and moves faster than a traditional contract.

What Is ERDC BOTAA 25-01?

ERDC BOTAA 25-01 is the current Broad Other Transaction Authority Announcement from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Research and Development Center. ERDC is the Army's premier engineering and environmental sciences research organization and is an integral component of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. The BOTAA is the standing vehicle ERDC uses to solicit prototype concept white papers from industry and academia, review them, and fund the ones that address a real government capability gap.

Unlike a traditional grant or contract solicitation with a hard due date, this announcement is open on a rolling basis. A company can submit whenever it has a concept that fits, and the government evaluates each white paper on its own merit against the criteria in the announcement, not against other submissions. All white papers are submitted electronically through ERDCWERX, the innovation hub that administers the announcement, at the ERDC BOTAA page on erdcwerx.org.

What Is a BOTAA and Why Does It Matter for Startups?

A BOTAA is a Broad Other Transaction Authority Announcement. It relies on Other Transaction authority, a flexible acquisition tool Congress gave the Department of Defense under 10 U.S.C. 4022 specifically to fund prototype projects. The key thing for a startup to understand is that Other Transactions are generally not subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or its supplements. That means the terms are negotiated between the company and the government rather than dictated by the full weight of federal procurement law, which usually translates into a faster and more collaborative path than a standard contract.

Other Transactions were designed to bring in companies that do not normally work with the Department of Defense. The technology can be a proof of concept, a model or process, a novel application of commercial technology for defense purposes, an agile development effort, or a demonstration of operational utility. If your company is building something with a plausible defense application in engineering, computing, sensing, materials, or infrastructure, a BOTAA is often the lowest-friction way to get in front of a government customer.

What Is ERDC Looking For? The Two Focus Areas in Detail

ERDC BOTAA 25-01 solicits prototype concepts across two business areas. Each contains several focus areas, and a company may submit against any of them.

Military Engineering (ME)

The Military Engineering business area is about giving the warfighter technologies and capabilities that enable force protection and maneuver. It contains ten focus areas:

Protective Structures and Systems. Technologies, materials, and processes that reduce manpower, logistics, or equipment hours while improving the survivability of individuals, small units, fighting positions, semi-fixed assets, outposts, and contingency bases. This includes planning tools and tactics that speed up force protection setup, reuse, and retrograde, as well as capabilities for overwatch, perimeter, port, and border security, surveillance, and warning.

Protection and Survivability. Unit-level and system-level technologies that detect, disable, survive, or defeat enemy weapon systems and characterize the threat they pose. This covers infrastructure hardening and retrofit, camouflage, reducing detectability and vulnerability, recoverability, and protection of personnel, critical assets, and facilities against conventional, unconventional, and advanced threats.

Geophysical Sensors and Data Fusion. Sensors, sensor systems, and unmanned systems that detect, assess, and persistently monitor threats and critical infrastructure across urban, subterranean, and complex terrain. The goal is automated fusion that builds an in-depth Common Operating Picture for surface and subsurface movement, maneuver, and force protection planning.

Vulnerability Assessment, Detection, and Analytics. Technology and processes that support strategic, operational, and tactical analysis of anti-terrorism and force protection posture, and of population and infrastructure disruption from combat, humanitarian, and disaster situations. Prototypes support assessment of mission assurance, population vulnerability, and resilience.

Geoscience, Environmental, Geospatial, and Material Modeling and Simulation. Computational methods and materials-by-design capabilities that predict system performance, environmental impact on sensors, structural response to weapons effects, and level of protection. This includes simulating detection of above-ground, below-ground, and maritime avenues of approach.

Enhance and Assess Mobility of Manned and Unmanned Systems. Technologies that accelerate platform development, integrate autonomous systems, and improve mobility across complex terrain. This covers obstacle and gap crossing, vehicle and soil interaction, mobility hazard detection, and modeling and simulation tools that predict ground vehicle and watercraft performance in varied weather and terrain.

Engineering and Engineering Enabling Technologies. A broad category covering combat engineering, mobility and counter-mobility, explosive effects, breaching, materials, manufacturing and process technologies, modeling and simulation, virtual prototyping, operational energy, autonomous systems, prime power, and engineer-related environmental technologies.

Global Access Engineering. Technologies, materials, and planning tools for technical reconnaissance, construction, maintenance, repair, and upgrade of infrastructure critical to force projection and theater access. This includes remote sensing and field methods for assessing soils, ice and snow, pavements, matting, terrain, bathymetry, river currents, port depths, airfields, roads, rail, and bridges.

Infrastructure Maintenance, Repair, and Reconstruction Technologies. Materials and equipment that rapidly assess, repair, and reconstruct pavements, bridges, railways, ports, and airfields. Prototypes include physics-based tools for measuring layer thickness and strength, rail and pier capacity, and bridge structural capacity, plus new repair equipment and field kits.

Engineering Analysis Tools and Decision Aid Prototype Software. Software that integrates advanced engineering algorithms for evaluating, designing, repairing, and operating critical infrastructure in support of force projection and maneuver planning.

Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

The Engineered Resilient Systems business area combines advanced engineering with high-performance computing to amplify the design options examined early in the acquisition process. It contains seven focus areas:

Cybersecurity. Techniques, software, hardware, and tools that protect critical infrastructure and advanced manufacturing control systems, including industrial control systems, SCADA systems, programmable logic controllers, and networks, against adaptive cyber adversaries. ERDC is interested in networked, host-based, and behavior-based approaches that deliver holistic defense and cyber situational awareness.

High Performance Computing Enabled Advanced Manufacturing. Tools and systems that support advanced manufacturing, including 3-D printing, and that bring HPC resources to the point of manufacture. Areas of interest include multi-physics and multi-scale approaches, optimization, trade-space analytics, uncertainty quantification, data-driven and machine learning methods, virtual testing, AI-enabled certification, and the ability to design, fabricate, and test large-scale components more than a meter in length for uses such as armor, aerospace and marine substructures, blast and ballistic protection, and rotorcraft components.

High Performance Data Analytics. Techniques and tools that examine data sets too large or complex for traditional processing to uncover hidden patterns, correlations, and multidimensional trends, using HPC, heterogeneous computing, and next-generation algorithms.

System Engineering Techniques. Advanced system engineering methods that address acquisition and readiness challenges through design trade-space development, analysis of many candidate designs, and condition-based maintenance driven by sensor and maintenance data, often using artificial intelligence and machine learning at massive data volume.

HPC Enabled Development of Surrogate Models and Data Analytics. Computationally efficient and accurate surrogate models for full-order systems, with application areas including blast effects, flight envelope simulation, turbulent rotor dynamics, fluid-structure-thermal interaction, and physics-informed machine learning.

Leveraging HPC Capabilities for On-the-Edge Computing. Tools that deliver high-performance computing at the point of need to improve soldier situational awareness, including electro-optical, thermal, radar, and acoustic sensor data processing, terrain characterization and mapping, sensor fusion, anomaly detection, and local maneuver planning.

Computational Material Testing and Validation. Computational processes for testing and validating components produced through advanced manufacturing, connecting standard manufacturing procedures to engineering mechanics simulation and reducing uncertainty in additively manufactured parts.

Who Is Eligible to Apply?

ERDC awards Other Transactions to nontraditional defense contractors, traditional defense contractors, and nonprofit research institutions. To actually receive an award, at least one of the following conditions must be met:

There is at least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the prototype project, or

All significant participants in the transaction other than the federal government are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors, or

At least one-third of the total cost of the prototype project is paid out of funds provided by parties other than the federal government.

A nontraditional defense contractor is an entity that has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the announcement, any DoD contract or subcontract subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards. Most commercial technology companies and venture-backed startups qualify as nontraditional, which is exactly why this vehicle fits them so well. A nontraditional partner can sit at the prime level, as a team member, as a subcontractor, or as a lower-tier vendor, as long as it is a key participant supplying a meaningful technology, doing a significant share of the work, or materially improving cost, schedule, or performance.

Prospective awardees must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) before award, so companies that are not yet registered should start that process early. Work under any resulting agreement is subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and each offeror is responsible for compliance.

How Much Funding Is Available?

This is one of the most important differences between a BOTAA and a program like SBIR. There is no published dollar ceiling for ERDC BOTAA 25-01. Funding is scoped to the prototype concept itself.

At the white paper stage, a company provides a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) price, which is an estimate of what the prototype would cost, along with any anticipated cost share. The government evaluates whether that ROM is commensurate with the proposed solution. If the concept advances to a full proposal, pricing is submitted on a firm fixed price basis and structured as a milestone payment schedule, where each milestone has a description, a price, and a target completion date. Payments are tied to completed events rather than reimbursed as incurred costs.

Cost share is directly connected to eligibility. If your project qualifies through significant nontraditional or small business participation, cost share is generally not required. If you instead rely on the third eligibility path, at least one-third of total project cost must come from non-federal sources. Cost share can be cash or in-kind, where in-kind means non-financial resources such as wear and tear on capital equipment, the prorated value of facility space, or the fair market value of materials used on the project.

The government does not reimburse the cost of preparing white papers or proposals, and no costs incurred before the effective date of an agreement are recoverable.

What Is the Timeline and How Does the Process Work?

Because the announcement is continuously open, the timeline is driven by review cycles rather than a due date. The process runs as follows:

First, the company submits a white paper against any focus area through ERDCWERX. The white paper is the technical concept and rough pricing, limited to three pages plus a cover page.

Second, the government reviews the white paper against the evaluation criteria in the announcement. White papers judged advantageous are selected for further consideration.

Third, the company is notified of selection or non-selection, typically within 60 to 90 days of submission.

Fourth, if a white paper is selected and funding is available, the government may request a solution pitch or technical demonstration and may issue a Request for Prototype Proposal (RFPP). If a white paper is selected but funding is not currently available, the government may keep it in an electronic library for consideration and possible funding for up to three years after submission.

Fifth, once an RFPP is issued, the company collaborates with the government to develop the Statement of Work, then submits a full proposal within the time stated in the RFPP.

Sixth, the government evaluates the proposal, negotiates as needed, and makes an award once terms and conditions are agreed upon.

A significant advantage sits at the end of this path. Under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), a company that successfully completes a prototype Other Transaction can receive a follow-on production award on a noncompetitive basis. In other words, a well-executed prototype can open the door to production work without having to re-compete.

What Does the White Paper Require?

The white paper is short and focused. It runs no more than three pages, not counting the cover page, and includes the following.

A cover page, generated from the submission form, capturing the point of contact, the submitting business and its Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, business status (nontraditional, traditional, or nonprofit research institution), the focus areas addressed, a project title, a prototype description, the DoD purpose, and the ROM price.

Technical requirements, covering the background and benefits of the proposed solution, the technical approach with a clearly defined prototype, and anticipated data rights assertions if applicable.

A Rough Order of Magnitude price, including anticipated cost share if applicable and any supporting documentation.

Formatting requirements are specific. Pages are 8.5 by 11 inches, numbered X of Y. Margins are at least one inch on all sides. The font is 12 point Times New Roman, single spaced. All acronyms are spelled out on first use. The language is English. The file must be a PDF compatible with Adobe Acrobat Reader 11.0 and under 20 MB. Classified information must not be included, and generic capability brochures are not accepted in place of a white paper.

How Are White Papers Evaluated?

White papers are assessed on an integrated basis against four considerations: the degree to which the solution meets a government problem, need, or capability gap within an identified focus area; whether the ROM price is commensurate with the proposed solution; government funding availability; and whether the submission sufficiently demonstrates one of the eligibility conditions, meaning significant nontraditional participation, significant nonprofit research institution participation, an all small business or nontraditional participant pool, or at least one-third non-federal cost share.

If the project advances to a full proposal, evaluation broadens to scientific and technical merit, the qualifications of the program manager and key personnel, the significance of any nontraditional or nonprofit participation, and whether the budget is realistic, reasonable, and fully justified.

Why This Opportunity Deserves Attention

The BOTAA is one of the most accessible defense funding mechanisms available to a company that is not already embedded in the defense industrial base, and it is not widely tracked by commercially focused firms. Recent activity suggests the odds are reasonable for a well-targeted concept. Based on figures reflecting the current fiscal year, an estimated 20 to 25 of roughly 200 submissions advanced to the proposal stage or received funding, which points to an advancement rate above 10 percent. That is broadly comparable to what strong applicants see in competitive SBIR programs, and it is achieved with a much shorter initial submission.

The breadth of the focus areas is the other reason to pay attention. Companies working in cybersecurity, high-performance computing and data analytics, advanced and additive manufacturing, edge computing, modeling and simulation, autonomous systems, sensors, advanced materials, and infrastructure technologies all have a natural home under Military Engineering or Engineered Resilient Systems. If your technology has any of those characteristics and a plausible defense application, the three-page white paper is a low-cost way to test government interest.

How BW&CO Helps

BW&CO Consulting helps deep-tech, biotech, medtech, and defense-adjacent founders win non-dilutive federal funding, including Other Transaction opportunities like ERDC BOTAA 25-01. We help you determine whether your technology fits a Military Engineering or Engineered Resilient Systems focus area, position the concept against a specific government capability gap, structure eligibility and any cost share, and build a white paper that survives evaluation. If you want to know whether this vehicle is a fit for your company, reach out and we will assess it with you.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ERDC BOTAA 25-01?

ERDC BOTAA 25-01 is a Broad Other Transaction Authority Announcement issued in October 2024 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center. It uses Other Transaction authority under 10 U.S.C. 4022 to fund prototype projects in Military Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems, and it is continuously open with no fixed deadline.

Who can apply to the ERDC BOTAA?

Nontraditional defense contractors, traditional defense contractors, and nonprofit research institutions can apply. To receive an award, the project must include significant nontraditional or nonprofit participation, consist of only small business and nontraditional participants, or include at least one-third non-federal cost share.

What is the deadline for the ERDC BOTAA?

There is no deadline. The announcement is continuously open, so white papers can be submitted at any time and are evaluated as they arrive.

How much funding can I receive through the BOTAA?

There is no published dollar ceiling. Funding is scoped to the prototype concept. Companies provide a Rough Order of Magnitude price at the white paper stage, and full proposals are priced on a firm fixed price basis with milestone payments.

Is cost share required?

Cost share is not automatically required. If your project qualifies through significant nontraditional or small business participation, you generally do not need cost share. If you qualify through the third eligibility path, at least one-third of total project cost must come from non-federal sources, and that share can be cash or in-kind.

What are the focus areas of ERDC BOTAA 25-01?

There are two business areas. Military Engineering covers protective structures, protection and survivability, geophysical sensors and data fusion, vulnerability analytics, geoscience and material modeling, mobility of manned and unmanned systems, engineering enabling technologies, global access engineering, infrastructure repair, and decision-aid software. Engineered Resilient Systems covers cybersecurity, HPC-enabled advanced manufacturing, high performance data analytics, system engineering techniques, surrogate model development, edge computing, and computational material testing.

What is a nontraditional defense contractor?

A nontraditional defense contractor is an entity that has not performed a DoD contract or subcontract subject to full Cost Accounting Standards coverage for at least the one-year period preceding the announcement. Most commercial and venture-backed technology companies qualify.

What is an Other Transaction?

An Other Transaction is a flexible award instrument authorized under 10 U.S.C. 4022 for prototype projects. Other Transactions are generally not subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which allows terms to be negotiated and typically enables a faster, more collaborative process than a traditional contract.

How long is the white paper?

The white paper is three pages or fewer, not counting the cover page. It must be a PDF under 20 MB, formatted in 12 point Times New Roman, single spaced, with one-inch margins and numbered pages.

How long does the review take?

Companies are typically notified of selection or non-selection within 60 to 90 days of submitting a white paper.

Can a prototype lead to a production contract?

Yes. Under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), a company that successfully completes a prototype Other Transaction can receive a follow-on production award on a noncompetitive basis.

How do I submit a white paper?

White papers are submitted electronically through ERDCWERX at the Broad Other Transaction Authority Announcement page on erdcwerx.org. Do not include classified information, and do not submit generic capability brochures in place of a white paper.

How is a BOTAA different from SBIR?

A BOTAA has no fixed deadline, no published funding ceiling, and a much shorter initial submission (a three-page white paper rather than a full proposal). It uses Other Transaction authority outside the Federal Acquisition Regulation and can lead directly to noncompetitive production, whereas SBIR follows fixed phases, set award amounts, and periodic solicitation windows.

ARPA-H ASCENT-IBO: Ibogaine Clinical Trials for Opioid Use Disorder (Funding Opportunity Overview)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

ASCENT-IBO (Accelerating Safe Clinical Evaluation of Novel Treatments: Ibogaine for Better Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder) is a funding opportunity from the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H). It is issued as Special Notice ARPA-H-SN-26-158 under the Proactive Health Office Innovative Solutions Opening (ISO) ARPA-H-SOL-24-106. ARPA-H is seeking teams to design and run accelerated, combined Phase I and Phase II clinical trials that evaluate the safety and efficacy of ibogaine in high-risk patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Interested organizations submit a Solution Summary of no more than six pages by October 15, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET. Commercial, industry-led teams with an active or imminent Investigational New Drug (IND) application are explicitly favored. This effort implements Executive Order 14401, Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness.

What Is ASCENT-IBO and Who Issued It?

ASCENT-IBO is a Special Notice published by ARPA-H, the research funding agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that pursues high-risk, high-reward health breakthroughs. The full title is Accelerating Safe Clinical Evaluation of Novel Treatments: Ibogaine for Better Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder.

The Special Notice carries identifier ARPA-H-SN-26-158. It builds on an earlier notice, ARPA-H-SN-26-156, which established a Proactive Health Office (PHO) area of interest tied to Executive Order 14401. ASCENT-IBO is supplementary to the underlying solicitation and does not change it. All submissions are made to, and must comply with, the PHO Innovative Solutions Opening ISO ARPA-H-SOL-24-106.

In plain terms, ARPA-H wants to close a specific gap: despite anecdotal reports of ibogaine reducing opioid cravings and withdrawal, there is currently no active U.S. clinical trial with an open IND studying ibogaine for OUD. ASCENT-IBO is the agency's push to change that quickly and safely.

Why Is ARPA-H Funding Ibogaine Research Now?

Opioid use disorder affects more than five million people in the United States, and more than 75 percent of individuals with OUD receive no treatment at all. Existing medications for OUD such as buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone, usually paired with psychotherapy, reduce overdose deaths and improve outcomes, but dropout and relapse rates remain high, and the period following treatment discontinuation or a nonfatal overdose is a well-documented window of elevated mortality risk.

Ibogaine belongs to a class of compounds ARPA-H refers to as neuroplastogens, rapid-acting interventions that may drive lasting, beneficial changes in brain function. Early and largely anecdotal evidence from unregulated clinics abroad suggests it may meaningfully reduce opioid cravings and withdrawal, but that evidence has never been tested in a rigorous, federally authorized U.S. trial.

The policy driver is Executive Order 14401, Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness, signed April 18, 2026. The order directs the federal government to accelerate research models and drug approvals for psychedelic and neuroplastogen-based treatments, specifically naming ibogaine, and to partner with state governments advancing this work. Texas launched an ibogaine research consortium in 2025, which is one example of the state-level activity the order references.

What Is ARPA-H Actually Looking For?

ARPA-H is asking for a Solution Summary of no more than six pages that describes, at a high level, a plan to design and execute accelerated clinical trials of ibogaine for OUD. A competitive Solution must address all three of the following tasks. Partial responses that cover only one or two tasks are unlikely to advance.

Task 1: Combined Phase I/II Clinical Trial Design

The centerpiece of the ask is a study design that evaluates safety and efficacy at the same time, in patient cohorts with OUD who are at increased risk of mortality. ARPA-H wants the design described at a high level across four specific dimensions:

• Dosing strategy. Ibogaine dosing approaches that reach clinically relevant, psychoactive exposure levels associated with therapeutic effect.

• Set and setting. The therapeutic environment and psychological support framework used during and after ibogaine administration to maximize therapeutic potential.

• Placebo strategy. An appropriate placebo or active comparator that minimizes patient bias and preserves blinding as much as ibogaine's strong psychoactive profile allows, including a plan to measure patient unblinding so its effect on outcomes can be interpreted.

• Safety assessments and risk mitigation. Rigorous monitoring aligned with gold-standard scientific and regulatory principles. Solutions are expected to name known and anticipated risks in ibogaine and OUD populations, in particular drug-related cardiotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, and detoxification and opioid withdrawal management, and to describe active safety controls such as dose de-escalation or step-back actions that prioritize patient safety.

Task 2: Operational Plans for Trial Execution

Beyond the design, ARPA-H wants a high-level operational plan for actually running the trial. This includes staff training, integration planning, patient education, and a patient recruitment strategy that is scalable and ethically sound.

Task 3: Future Development Plans

Solutions should show a path forward, including high-level plans to prepare for accelerated entry into Phase III and plans to develop a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS).

There is also an encouraged but optional element. Solutions that consider using the FDA's Expanded Access program or the Right-to-Try Act to broaden access for eligible patients are described by ARPA-H as highly encouraged, though not required.

What Makes a Solution Competitive?

ARPA-H is unusually direct about what will rise to the top. A startup or company preparing a Solution Summary should weigh the following signals:

• Commercial, industry-led teams are favored. ARPA-H states that Solutions led by a commercial entity responsible for all clinical trial execution activities may be most advantageous for rapid advancement and eventual market entry.

• An IND is close to the center of the evaluation. Solutions with an IND application already submitted, or with imminent plans to submit to the FDA, will be prioritized.

• Combined Phase I and II design plus well-defined safety strategies are prioritization criteria in their own right.

• Full coverage of the statement of work is expected. Teams are responsible for every element of the SOW and are expected to have adequate personnel, including regulatory consultants with neuroplastogen drug development expertise.

• Existing relationships and state-level support should be spelled out. If a team has partnerships or state-level backing for ibogaine or neuroplastogen clinical development, ARPA-H wants those commitments described clearly.

• Affordability and public health thinking help. Because ARPA-H aims to increase patient access, the most competitive Solutions will include initial concepts for affordability, price transparency, and public health benefit models for the period after advanced clinical development.

What Is Out of Scope?

Some approaches are explicitly disqualified. ASCENT-IBO does not want Solutions that propose ibogaine-derived derivatives or analogues, other neuroplastogen compounds including but not limited to psilocybin and ketamine, or neuromodulation-based treatments. This notice is specifically about ibogaine itself for OUD.

How Much Funding Is Available?

The Special Notice does not publish a dollar figure, a ceiling, or a fixed number of awards for ASCENT-IBO. This is normal for this type of vehicle. ASCENT-IBO runs through the Proactive Health Office Innovative Solutions Opening (ISO ARPA-H-SOL-24-106), and ARPA-H funds ISO projects on an individual basis using its range of flexible mechanisms, which for this kind of translational work typically means Other Transaction agreements rather than standard grants. Award size is negotiated based on the scope of the proposed trial rather than set by a published cap.

Two practical points follow from this. First, ARPA-H will not reimburse any costs incurred in responding to this Special Notice, attending Proposers' Day, or preparing submissions to the ISO. Second, the ISO uses a two-step gate: proposers submit a Solution Summary first, ARPA-H provides written feedback on viability and interest, and a full proposal should only be submitted after that feedback is received. A full proposal submitted without ARPA-H's written response can be rejected.

What Are the Key Dates and Deadlines?

• Proposers' Day registration opened: August 5, 2026

• Proposers' Day registration deadline: September 7, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET

• Proposers' Day (Washington, D.C. metro area): September 15, 2026, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ET

• Solution Summary requested by: October 15, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET

All dates are subject to change, and the Special Notice on SAM.gov is the authoritative source. The underlying ISO itself remains open on a rolling basis, but ASCENT-IBO's Solution Summary target date is October 15, 2026.

What Is Proposers' Day and Should You Attend?

Proposers' Day is an optional event held in the Washington, D.C. metro area for organizations considering a Solution. It is not intended for patients, patient advocates, or general-interest audiences. The agenda includes an overview of the area of interest by government personnel, lightning talks where organizations can present one slide in three minutes on a first-come first-served basis, and a panel of federal agencies covering regulatory considerations, clinical guidance, and anticipated challenges.

Registration is required in advance through the ARPA-H Solutions events page, there is no fee, and there is no same-day registration. In-person attendees must present valid government-issued photo identification. Virtual attendance is available once registration is verified. If a team wants to give a lightning talk, it must flag that intent during registration, with no more than one submission per organization.

How Do You Apply?

Interested organizations submit a Solution Summary of no more than six pages, following Appendix A of the PHO ISO ARPA-H-SOL-24-106, through the ARPA-H Solutions site. The Solution Summary must be responsive to all three tasks described above. After review, ARPA-H contacts proposers with further guidance, and only teams that receive a positive written response should proceed to a full proposal.

ARPA-H expects that strong Solutions will require combining expertise, facilities, and capabilities across organizations, and it maintains a teaming page where prospective performers can post profiles and find collaborators. This is worth using early, since assembling clinical, regulatory, and commercial expertise before the deadline is one of the harder parts of a competitive submission.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ASCENT-IBO stand for?

ASCENT-IBO stands for Accelerating Safe Clinical Evaluation of Novel Treatments: Ibogaine for Better Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder. It is an ARPA-H funding opportunity focused on accelerated Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of ibogaine for opioid use disorder.

What is the Notice ID for ASCENT-IBO?

The Special Notice is ARPA-H-SN-26-158. Submissions are made through the Proactive Health Office Innovative Solutions Opening, ISO ARPA-H-SOL-24-106.

When is the ASCENT-IBO Solution Summary due?

The Solution Summary is requested by October 15, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET. Dates can change, so confirm against the Special Notice on SAM.gov before finalizing a submission.

How long is the Solution Summary?

No more than six pages, following Appendix A of the ISO ARPA-H-SOL-24-106.

Does a company need an IND to apply?

An IND is not an absolute requirement to submit a Solution Summary, but ARPA-H will prioritize Solutions that already have an IND application submitted or have imminent plans to submit one to the FDA. Teams without a clear IND path are at a competitive disadvantage.

Can academic institutions apply, or is this only for companies?

Academic and other organizations can participate, and teaming is encouraged. However, ARPA-H states that commercial, industry-led Solutions where a single commercial entity is responsible for all clinical trial execution may be most advantageous for rapid advancement and market entry. Many competitive teams will pair a commercial lead with academic and clinical partners.

Are psilocybin, ketamine, or ibogaine analogues eligible?

No. Solutions proposing ibogaine-derived derivatives or analogues, other neuroplastogens such as psilocybin and ketamine, or neuromodulation-based treatments do not align with this notice. ASCENT-IBO is specifically about ibogaine for OUD.

How much money can an awardee receive?

The Special Notice does not publish a specific dollar amount or ceiling. Funding runs through the PHO ISO, which uses ARPA-H's flexible mechanisms, commonly Other Transaction agreements, with award size scoped to the proposed trial. ARPA-H does not reimburse costs of responding to the notice.

Do you have to attend Proposers' Day to submit?

No. Proposers' Day is optional. It is a useful way to hear directly from federal agencies on regulatory and clinical considerations and to find teaming partners, but attendance is not a condition of submitting a Solution Summary.

What safety risks does ARPA-H specifically want addressed?

ARPA-H calls out drug-related cardiotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, and detoxification and opioid withdrawal management as known and anticipated risks, and it expects active mitigation strategies such as dose de-escalation or step-back actions to protect patient safety.

What executive order is this connected to?

ASCENT-IBO implements Executive Order 14401, Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness, signed April 18, 2026, which directs the federal government to accelerate access to psychedelic and neuroplastogen treatments, including ibogaine, for serious mental illness.

How BW&CO Can Help

BW&CO Consulting helps deep-tech, biotech, medtech, and health-focused startups win non-dilutive federal funding. For an opportunity like ASCENT-IBO, that means positioning a combined Phase I/II design against ARPA-H's stated priorities, tightening the IND and regulatory narrative, structuring a commercial-led team with the right clinical and neuroplastogen expertise, and preparing a Solution Summary that clears ARPA-H's written-feedback gate on the first pass. If you are considering a submission, reach out before the October 15, 2026 target date so there is time to build the team and the trial narrative.

2026 SBA Critical Suppliers Prize Competition

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

The 2026 Critical Suppliers Prize Competition is a U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) prize challenge offering up to $20 million in non-dilutive funding, with an expected 4 to 6 winners each receiving up to $6 million. It is designed to help profitable, execution-ready U.S. small manufacturers rapidly scale existing production in three priority areas: advanced metals manufacturing, advanced materials manufacturing, and energy systems, energetics, and components. Submissions are due by August 28, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. ET, sent by email to investinnovate@sba.gov. There is no application fee and no equity is taken. Winners are announced on or about September 10, 2026.

Key Facts at a Glance

‍ ‍

Funding agency: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). Legal authority: America COMPETES Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 3719. Funding type: non-dilutive prize funding, not a grant, contract, or equity investment. Total prize pool: up to $20 million. Award size: up to $6 million per winner. Expected number of winners: 4 to 6. Deadline: August 28, 2026, 11:59 p.m. ET. Winners announced: on or about September 10, 2026. Application cost: free. Submission method: email to investinnovate@sba.gov. Estimated time to complete a submission: about 3 hours.

‍ ‍

Program Overview

‍ ‍

The SBA created this competition to strengthen U.S. industrial supply chains by putting capital directly into small manufacturers that are already operating and already generating revenue. The central idea is reshoring with innovation rather than reshoring for its own sake. A large share of U.S. manufacturing was offshored over the past several decades, and the program aims to bring that capacity back in a form that competes on efficiency and scale, not just on location.

‍ ‍

The most important distinction to understand up front is that this is scale-up money, not research and development money. The funds are meant to refine, accelerate, and scale solutions that already exist. Companies that are still in the research phase, still proving a concept, or still building a first product are not the target for this competition. The SBA is explicitly looking for established suppliers that can turn capital into measurable increases in production or measurable improvements in production efficiency within six months of receiving an award.

‍ ‍

Awards are structured as prize payments tied to projected and completed operational milestones. In practice, that means the money is released against defined, near-term deliverables rather than handed over as a lump sum with no strings. Winners must be able to point to a specific milestone, show how the prize money moves them toward it, and demonstrate that the milestone produces a tangible output on a short timeline.

‍ ‍

Who This Is For

‍ ‍

This competition is a strong fit for a company that is a U.S.-based small business, is currently profitable and creditworthy, is already manufacturing at some scale, and has a clear, fundable plan to expand output or improve production efficiency in the next one to six months. It is a poor fit for a pre-revenue startup, an early-stage R&D company, or any firm whose primary need is to fund research, hire staff, cover overhead, or extend runway. If the honest answer to "could we deploy this money into production within six months and show a measurable result" is no, this is not the right opportunity.

‍ ‍

The Three Award Focus Areas

‍ ‍

Every eligible submission must provide tangible deliverables in at least one of three Award Focus Areas. These represent the supply chain gaps and chokepoints the SBA is prioritizing.

‍ ‍

The first focus area is Advanced Metals Manufacturing. This includes rapid tooling, precision casting and forging, heat treated components, strategic and critical minerals, and rare earth element recovery and magnet production. Companies working on domestic critical mineral processing, magnet supply, or high-precision metal component production fit squarely here.

‍ ‍

The second focus area is Advanced Materials Manufacturing. This includes large format additive manufacturing and materials transformation. Firms scaling industrial-scale additive manufacturing or novel materials processing are the target.

‍ ‍

The third focus area is Energy Systems, Energetics and Components. This includes nuclear energy, battery energy storage systems, and standardization efforts. Companies producing energy storage hardware, nuclear-related components, or working on standardization across energy systems fit this area.

‍ ‍

A company only needs to align with one of these areas, but the alignment must be genuine and demonstrable. The judges evaluate mission alignment as a scored criterion, so a stretched or tangential connection to a focus area is a weak position.

‍ ‍

Funding Allowance: What the Money Can and Cannot Be Used For

‍ ‍

This is one of the most restrictive parts of the competition, and it is where many otherwise strong companies will disqualify themselves if they are not careful. The core principle is that award money must go toward operational milestones that scale production or improve production efficiency, and it must not go toward general overhead.

‍ ‍

The solicitation lists eight prohibited uses. The prize money cannot be used for repayment of indebtedness. It cannot be used for hiring new staff or any other employee compensation. It cannot be used for additional research and development. It cannot be used for distributions to shareholders or investors. It cannot be used for advertising or marketing. It cannot be used for rent, lease expenses, or utilities. It cannot be used for business travel. It cannot be used for office supplies.

‍ ‍

The solicitation does not publish a matching list of approved cost categories. What it does require is proof that the funds go toward a defined near-term production milestone and not toward overhead. Reading the prohibited list together with the milestone requirement, the eligible uses point toward direct capital deployment that expands or improves production, for example tooling, production equipment, capacity expansion, and materials and process improvements that generate measurable output within six months. Applicants should describe their intended use in exactly those terms and should explicitly demonstrate that no portion of the award covers general overhead.

‍ ‍

A practical tip: the pitch deck outline asks applicants to describe other sources of capital that will be deployed alongside the prize money. This is deliberate. The SBA wants to see that the award slots into a real capital stack and funds a specific production milestone, not that it becomes the company's operating budget.

‍ ‍

Eligibility Requirements

‍ ‍

Only eligible contestants may enter, and only one entry per business will be considered. An individual cannot belong to more than one entry.

‍ ‍

At the company level, a contestant must be a U.S.-based small business under SBA size standards. It must be organized in and maintain its primary place of business in the United States or its territories. It must be profitable and able to demonstrate creditworthiness. It must be in good standing in the jurisdiction of its state of organization. It must be current and in good standing on all federal obligations. Any business, or any business owned or controlled by a person, that previously defaulted on a federal loan or federally guaranteed financing and caused the government a loss is ineligible. For this purpose, a compromise agreement described at 31 C.F.R. 3711 is also treated as a loss.

‍ ‍

At the individual level, everyone submitting a response, including individuals from partner organizations, must be a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident who is at least eighteen years old at the time of submission. All members of the contestant's senior management team must also be U.S. citizens or permanent residents over the age of eighteen.

‍ ‍

Certain parties are barred entirely. SBA employees and SBA contractors, federal entities, and federal employees acting within the scope of their employment cannot participate. Any individual or organization currently suspended or debarred by the federal government cannot participate.

‍ ‍

Finally, every eligible contestant must agree to assume the risks of participation, waive claims against the federal government, and accept the liability and insurance requirements set out in the competition rules.

‍ ‍

The Six-Month Test

‍ ‍

Eligibility and scoring both hinge on speed. A contestant must demonstrate the ability to deploy funds rapidly, defined as within six months. A contestant must also demonstrate that with the award it will achieve a measurable increase in production or implement a solution that supports production efficiency, also within six months of the award. The program describes itself as prioritizing execution-ready firms with clear pathways to near-term supply chain impact. If a company cannot credibly show measurable results inside a six-month window, it will struggle against the judging criteria even if it is technically eligible.

‍ ‍

Timeline and Key Dates

‍ ‍

The submission window opened on July 28, 2026, and closes on August 28, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. The screening, vetting, and judging period runs from July 28, 2026, through September 10, 2026. Winners are announced on or about September 10, 2026. The full cycle from open to award is compressed into roughly six weeks, which reinforces the program's emphasis on companies that are ready to move immediately.

‍ ‍

Given the short window, any interested company should treat the pitch deck and its supporting financials as something to prepare now rather than something to build in the final days before the deadline.

‍ ‍

How to Apply

‍ ‍

There is no fee to enter and no formal application portal. Submissions are emailed directly to investinnovate@sba.gov and must arrive by the August 28, 2026, 11:59 p.m. deadline. SBA estimates that completing a submission takes about three hours on average.

‍ ‍

A pitch deck is suggested but not strictly required. If you choose to submit one, the SBA provides an example outline organized around telling your company's story, explaining how you would use the prize money, and showing how you would fulfill the competition goals. The suggested structure has four parts.

‍ ‍

The Introduction covers a brief description of the business with a website link, plus a condensed summary of how the business addresses the competition goals.

‍ ‍

The Operating History and Current Capital Needs section covers a snapshot of financial performance from the most recent reporting period, a brief company history including founding date and milestones achieved, and a snapshot of current capital needs including current investors, debt providers, cashflow from operations, and any other federal funding received.

‍ ‍

The Potential Impact section covers the near-term milestone to be achieved with the award, a description of how the proceeds will be used within one to six months, a description of other capital deployed alongside the award, proof that the award will not be used for general overhead, and a business plan snapshot with a revenue forecast that assumes achieving the milestone compared to projections without the award.

‍ ‍

The References section provides names and contact information for customers, suppliers, board members, the accounting firm, outside counsel, and other character references for the senior management team. Because reference calls feed directly into the character and integrity scoring, these references should be chosen carefully and given a heads-up.

‍ ‍

On visuals and media, images, diagrams, and other graphics are allowed with brief captions at a minimum resolution of 200 dpi. Two hard rules apply: the submission must not use the SBA logo or official seal, and it must not claim SBA endorsement.

‍ ‍

How Winners Are Selected

‍ ‍

Before any judging happens, every submission goes through a vetting and screening process for eligibility and completeness. Vetting can look at the general business reputation of the owners and management, risks posed by the organization, compliance with executive orders and applicable laws, and any conflicts of interest with the agency. SBA can request clarifying information at any point and can revisit eligibility at any time. Contestants that do not pass vetting cannot advance.

‍ ‍

A judging panel of impartial SBA personnel then rates the submissions against four criteria. The first is Character, Integrity and Cohesion of Management Team, which looks for clear evidence that the senior team is qualified to execute, that the team has high character and integrity based on materials and reference calls, and that the team is likely to keep working together toward the goal. The second is Business Model Evaluation, which checks that the proposed use of funds aligns with the competition goals and that the award will not be spent on overhead. The third is Execution Certainty, which looks at the likelihood of future success and whether the company has other sources of capital that round out the capital stack needed to execute. The fourth is Mission Alignment and Impact, which confirms the business aligns with the competition goals and that the proposed use of funds sits within a one-to-six-month window with projections showing measurable impact.

‍ ‍

The panel may also consider vetting information and the geographic location and dispersal of contestants when selecting winners. During judging, SBA may ask for clarification of technical and cost aspects, though this is not a commitment to fund.

‍ ‍

Intellectual Property and Legal Notes

‍ ‍

Intellectual property from the competition stays with the contestant. All entries remain the sole intellectual property of the individuals or organizations that developed them, and accepting an award does not transfer IP rights to the federal government. By entering, a contestant warrants that it is the sole author and copyright owner of the submission or has sufficient rights to use it.

‍ ‍

A few other terms are worth noting. By entering, contestants consent to SBA using their name, likeness, and related information for promotional purposes. All submissions become SBA records, cannot be returned, and are retained under National Archives guidelines, so contestants should mark any confidential commercial information at the time of submission. SBA reserves the right to modify or cancel the competition at any time before awards, and publication of the rules is not an obligation of funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

‍ ‍

What is the 2026 SBA Critical Suppliers Prize Competition?

‍ ‍

It is a prize competition run by the U.S. Small Business Administration under the America COMPETES Act that awards up to $20 million total in non-dilutive funding to U.S. small manufacturers, helping them rapidly scale existing production in critical supply chain areas. An expected 4 to 6 winners each receive up to $6 million.

‍ ‍

How much money can my company win?

‍ ‍

Each winner can receive up to $6 million. The SBA expects to name 4 to 6 winners, drawing from a total prize pool of up to $20 million.

‍ ‍

Is this funding non-dilutive?

‍ ‍

Yes. The award is non-dilutive prize funding. The SBA does not take equity, and the money is not a loan that must be repaid.

‍ ‍

Who is eligible to apply?

‍ ‍

A profitable, creditworthy U.S.-based small business that meets SBA size standards, is in good standing on its federal and state obligations, and has all senior management as U.S. citizens or permanent residents over eighteen. The company must be able to deploy funds and show measurable production impact within six months.

‍ ‍

What are the three award focus areas?

‍ ‍

Advanced Metals Manufacturing, Advanced Materials Manufacturing, and Energy Systems, Energetics and Components. A submission must provide tangible deliverables in at least one of these areas.

‍ ‍

Can a startup that is still doing R&D apply?

‍ ‍

No. This program funds scaling and refining of solutions that already exist, not research and development. Companies still in the research or concept phase are not the intended audience, and additional R&D is a prohibited use of the funds.

‍ ‍

What can the prize money be used for?

‍ ‍

The money must fund a defined near-term operational milestone that increases production or improves production efficiency within six months, and it must not touch general overhead. In practice that points toward capital deployment such as tooling, production equipment, capacity expansion, and materials or process improvements that produce measurable output.

‍ ‍

What can the prize money not be used for?

‍ ‍

It cannot be used for debt repayment, hiring or employee compensation, additional research and development, distributions to shareholders or investors, advertising or marketing, rent or lease expenses or utilities, business travel, or office supplies.

‍ ‍

Does my company have to be profitable?

‍ ‍

Yes. Contestants must be currently profitable and able to demonstrate creditworthiness. This is both an eligibility requirement and part of the scoring.

‍ ‍

How fast do I need to deploy the funds?

‍ ‍

Within six months. You must show both the ability to deploy the capital rapidly and the ability to achieve a measurable production increase or efficiency improvement inside that same six-month window.

‍ ‍

When is the deadline?

‍ ‍

August 28, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. ET. The submission window opened on July 28, 2026.

‍ ‍

How do I submit my entry?

‍ ‍

By email to investinnovate@sba.gov. There is no application portal and no fee.

‍ ‍

Do I have to submit a pitch deck?

‍ ‍

No. A pitch deck is suggested and the SBA provides an example outline, but it is optional. If you submit one, it should cover your company introduction, operating history and capital needs, potential impact and milestone plan, and references.

‍ ‍

Will the SBA take my intellectual property?

‍ ‍

No. All entries remain the sole intellectual property of the company that developed them, and accepting an award does not transfer any IP rights to the federal government.

‍ ‍

How are winners chosen?

‍ ‍

Submissions are first vetted for eligibility, completeness, business reputation, and conflicts of interest. A panel of SBA personnel then scores each surviving submission on four criteria: management team character and cohesion, business model, execution certainty, and mission alignment and impact. Geographic dispersal may also be considered.

‍ ‍

How many companies will win?

‍ ‍

The SBA intends to name 4 to 6 winners on or about September 10, 2026.

‍ ‍

Is there a cost to enter?

‍ ‍

No. Entry is free.

DARPA PINPOINT (HR001126S0016): What Your Startup Needs to Know

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

PINPOINT (Precision Inertial Navigation and Positioning On an Integrated Tesseract) is a DARPA Defense Sciences Office Broad Agency Announcement, number HR001126S0016, seeking revolutionary inertial measurement unit (IMU) technology for navigation in GPS-denied environments. DARPA wants novel micro-scale inertial sensors that break past the decade-long performance plateau of MEMS IMUs by using nonlinear physics such as electromagnetically levitated proof masses, high-velocity resonators, and non-linear mechanical structures, all co-designed with real-time adaptive control systems. This is a two-phase program, but only Phase I (24 months) is being solicited now. A conforming abstract is required by August 27, 2026, before any full proposal can be submitted, and full proposals are due September 25, 2026. Multiple awards are anticipated. Award instruments can be procurement contracts, cooperative agreements, or Other Transaction Agreements for Prototype.

Program Snapshot

Program name: Precision Inertial Navigation and Positioning On an Integrated Tesseract (PINPOINT). Funding opportunity number: HR001126S0016. Agency: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Defense Sciences Office (DSO). Announcement type: Initial Announcement (Broad Agency Announcement). Assistance Listing number: 12.910 Research and Technology Development. NAICS code: 541715. Posting date: August 6, 2026. Anticipated awards: multiple. Point of contact: PINPOINT@darpa.mil.

What Is PINPOINT?

PINPOINT is a DARPA program that challenges the research community to reinvent inertial navigation from the physics up. The goal is a proof-of-concept six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) IMU that delivers navigation and pointing performance approaching that of large, expensive navigation-grade systems, but in the small size, low weight, low power, and low cost (SWaP-C) footprint of modern tactical and unmanned platforms.

The program pairs two things that DARPA considers inseparable. The first is a new class of inertial sensor that operates in a highly nonlinear regime rather than the linear, small-motion regime that today's MEMS devices rely on. The second is an advanced, real-time adaptive control system designed to stabilize and actually harness those complex nonlinear dynamics. DARPA is explicit that these two elements must be co-designed together, not developed separately and bolted together later.

The Problem DARPA Is Trying to Solve

U.S. military operations depend heavily on GPS for positioning, navigation, and timing. That dependency becomes a liability in contested environments where GPS can be jammed, spoofed, or degraded by terrain and weather. When GPS goes down, warfighters fall back on Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), but current inertial technology forces a hard tradeoff.

At the high-performance end, strategic-grade systems such as ring-laser gyroscopes are precise but too large, too power-hungry, and too expensive for most tactical and unmanned platforms. At the compact end, MEMS IMUs are small and cheap, but their performance has been flat for roughly a decade. They suffer from noise and drift severe enough that they become unreliable within seconds. Alternatives such as visual navigation still rely on a baseline IMU, carry their own SWaP burden, and fail in fog, during rapid motion, or over featureless terrain like open water, clouds, and deserts.

PINPOINT is designed to close the gap between the large and costly high-performers and the SWaP-C-constrained tactical systems, delivering navigation-grade behavior in GPS-contested settings. DARPA points to its earlier Highly Accelerated Learning of Vibratory Systems (HALOVS) portfolio as a foundation, noting that resonators operating near the fundamental material fracture limit can offer more than two orders of magnitude improvement over today's devices, and that levitated structures can isolate the sensing mass from its substrate to eliminate anchor losses and environmental coupling.

What DARPA Is Looking For

DARPA wants revolutionary approaches, and it is blunt about what that means. The technical area is the physics and nonlinear control of inertial measurement units for tactical and unmanned missions. Proposers should investigate approaches that enable revolutionary advances in science, devices, or systems.

Approaches DARPA specifically invites you to consider include electromagnetically levitated proof masses, non-linear resonators, high-velocity tethered microsystems, and non-linear mechanical structures. Prior participation in a DARPA program is not required, but proposers are encouraged to build on the public science documented in the HALOVS portfolio. The solicitation stays open to alternative approaches, provided you can show compelling evidence that your solution can hit the program metrics within the program timeline.

DARPA also wants more than hardware. Every performer will be required to deliver a comprehensive Design Guide and a Prototype Design Kit (PDK). The PDK must specify the simulated, usable design space and projected performance of the chosen technology platform, so that the delivered sensors can be redesigned as mission needs evolve over time. This is a core deliverable, not an afterthought.

What Is Explicitly Excluded

Research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of practice is specifically excluded. If your concept is a better version of a current MEMS device rather than a genuinely different physical approach, it will not align with this BAA. During conformity review, a proposal can be deemed non-conforming and removed from consideration if it does not investigate an innovative approach that enables revolutionary advances.

Target Applications and Performance Metrics

Each proposal must focus on a single target application and clearly state its system-level performance objectives, for example a circular error probable (CEP) for a given mission duration. You may submit multiple proposals, but each one must strictly address only one use case. DARPA offers two illustrative use cases with example metrics, and it also welcomes alternative defense-relevant use cases as long as the metrics you propose are at least as challenging.

Use Case One: Precision Strike Munitions

This application prioritizes high dynamic range plus robust shock and vibration immunity. The example Phase I targets are an accelerometer range of plus or minus 1,000 g, a gyroscope range of plus or minus 5,000 degrees per second, vibration survivability of 20 gRMS, shock survivability of 1,000 g, accelerometer noise (velocity random walk) of 10 millimeters per second per root hour, and gyroscope noise (angle random walk) of 1e-4 degrees per root hour.

The example Phase II targets, which are rough order-of-magnitude estimates only, scale up sharply: accelerometer range of plus or minus 10,000 g, gyroscope range of plus or minus 10,000 degrees per second, vibration survivability of 50 gRMS, shock survivability of 10,000 g, accelerometer noise below 1 millimeter per second per root hour, and gyroscope noise of 1e-5 degrees per root hour. SWaP is to be reported in the Design Guide.

Use Case Two: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems

This application prioritizes long-term stability so an INS can support dead reckoning in GPS-denied environments. The example Phase I targets are vibration survivability of 10 gRMS, accelerometer bias instability of 1 microgram measured as Allan Deviation at a 1,000-second integration time, and gyroscope bias instability of 1e-3 degrees per hour measured as Allan Deviation at a 1,000-second integration time.

The example Phase II targets, again rough estimates only, are vibration survivability of 20 gRMS, accelerometer bias instability of 0.1 microgram at the same 1,000-second point, and gyroscope bias instability of 2.5e-5 degrees per hour. SWaP is again reported in the Design Guide.

Alternative Use Cases

DARPA will consider other defense-relevant inertial-sensor use cases. Named examples include space operations, radiation-hard environments, navigation missions with intermediate time-scales, ten-year lifetime operation for ultra-low-power sensor networks, and hypersonic trajectories. If you propose an alternate use case, you must supply performance metrics that are at least as challenging as the examples above, and you must back your target with solid technical validation through modeling, simulation, and any available experimental data. You also need quantitative, measurable end-of-phase milestones, an estimated SWaP, and a clear plan including a description of the fabrication process.

Program Structure and Timeline

This BAA solicits Phase I only. Phase II is described for planning purposes and is not guaranteed.

Phase I (24 months)

Phase I asks performers to first prove out the mathematics and simulation of their nonlinear system and dynamic state estimator, then move to bench-top laboratory testing, and finally validate final designs through operational field-testing at designated Department of War (DoW) ranges. The concrete milestones and deliverables are as follows. At month 1, a program kick-off with presentation materials as a deliverable. At month 3, demonstrate and report preliminary mathematical models and simulation results of the control system and dynamic state estimator. At month 6, a Principal Investigator meeting with presentation materials as a deliverable. At month 12, a live laboratory demonstration and report covering all individual sensing components, meaning three acceleration and three rotation sensors, including angular rate, acceleration response, and Allan Deviation measurements out to at least 1,000 seconds for each sensing axis. At month 21, demonstrate sensors meeting Phase I metrics and deliver a minimum of three functional, packaged prototypes for independent verification and validation (IV&V) at a Government laboratory. At month 24, deliver the final hardware IMU samples for a total of five, plus the PDK and the final report.

Phase I performers must enter into an Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA). The ACA mandates sharing of critical, program-generated data among performer teams to accelerate cross-pollination, while setting up strict firewalls to prevent commercial misappropriation of proprietary intellectual property. This is a meaningful condition to understand before you commit, because it requires you to share certain program-generated data with other funded teams during Phase I. DARPA notes this broad data-sharing requirement will be relaxed in Phase II so industry-led teams can protect proprietary IP around their specific hardware and manufacturing processes.

Phase II (24 months, planning only)

Phase II is included for informational and planning purposes only. DARPA anticipates releasing Phase II proposal instructions to all Phase I performers by around month 20 of Phase I, through a separate solicitation. DARPA is not obligated to solicit Phase II, and the decision to continue will depend on Phase I results and available funds. The objective of Phase II is to improve sensor performance and demonstrate a packaging and ruggedization design that meets specific mission specifications, ending with transition-partner IV&V field testing and delivery of five packaged and tested IMU sensors.

Because of the phased approach, your current submission needs a fully definitized Phase I proposal with enough data for award negotiation, plus only a draft Statement of Work and a Rough Order of Magnitude cost for Phase II for Government planning purposes.

IV&V and Exit Criteria

DARPA describes illustrative test gauntlets. For precision strike munitions, the end of Phase I involves a repeated tri-axial 10,000 g shock survival test (referred to as the Hopkinson Bar Gauntlet), and the end of Phase II involves a live-fire launch from the Army SCAT gun in a surrogate munition, with an operate-through pass criterion requiring continuous accurate angular rate data through the launch event. For persistent autonomy, the end of Phase I involves a 24-hour thermal soak requiring a drift rate under 1.0e-3 degrees per hour at 1,000 seconds, and the end of Phase II involves a multi-hour flight on a Group 2 or Group 3 UAV with a pass criterion of CEP under 0.1 nautical miles per hour against truth data. Performer-defined use cases get a custom lab demonstration in Phase I and a custom field exam in Phase II, with pass criteria set during contract negotiation.

Meetings and Travel to Budget For

All proposals must build the following into schedule and cost. A two-day Principal Investigator meeting roughly every six months, and for costing you should assume these alternate between the U.S. east and west coasts. Regular quarterly teleconferences with the Government team for progress reporting and video demonstrations. At least one site visit per phase by the DARPA Program Manager.

Funding

DARPA does not publish a total program budget or a per-award dollar ceiling for the base Phase I effort in this BAA. That is normal for a DARPA BAA of this type, where award value is negotiated based on the technical and management approach in your proposal. Multiple awards are anticipated. Cost and schedule realism is an explicit and weighted evaluation criterion, so your budget needs to be defensible against your Statement of Work, with labor hours, materials, equipment, fabrication, and travel all substantiated.

For Other Transaction Agreements for Prototype, funding is structured as fixed payable milestones, meaning payment is rendered on successful completion of technically relevant, tangible events on the critical path, documented in the Schedule of Milestones and Payments. Some award instrument types carry specific cost-sharing requirements, so review the instrument-specific instructions linked in the solicitation.

Industry Immersion Program Option

The one concrete dollar figure in this solicitation applies to an optional add-on. Industry proposers that include university teams as subcontractors may propose an optional DSO Industry Immersion Program (IIP) task. It funds one U.S. citizen graduate student or postdoctoral researcher from each university partner to embed within a corporate partner's facility for a nine to twelve month period, with Government funding covering labor, travel, and per diem up to $160,000 per student. Each option is limited to a single student, and the decision to fund an IIP option is made independently of the decision to fund the base proposal.

Who Can Apply

All responsible sources capable of meeting the Government's needs may propose, including both U.S. and non-U.S. sources. Non-U.S. organizations and individuals may participate to the extent they comply with any required nondisclosure agreements, security regulations, and export control laws. Historically Black Colleges and Universities, small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and minority institutions are encouraged to propose, though no portion of the announcement is set aside for these organizations.

There are important restrictions for certain institution types. University-Affiliated Research Centers (UARCs), Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), Government entities, and National Laboratories face limits. DARPA will not establish new contractual agreements for these entities under this solicitation, so a proposal submitted by one of them as prime may be deemed non-conforming. They may participate as subcontractors only under specific conditions, including a clearly defined role with a point of contact and a rough order of magnitude cost placed in the technical proposal only, since the cost proposal must exclude their funding. UARC subawards additionally require an organizational conflict of interest mitigation plan. If funded, these organizations must share their work with other performers on the same program.

Compliance Considerations

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) applies to awards that take the form of procurement contracts. DARPA anticipates that procurement contracts under this BAA will require CMMC Level 1 or Level 2. The Government designates the required level in each resulting contract based on whether the work involves Federal Contract Information (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). CMMC Level 1 applies when only FCI is handled and requires implementing the 17 basic safeguarding requirements in FAR 52.204-21, with a current self-assessment recorded in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS). CMMC Level 2 may apply when CUI is handled on non-Federal systems and requires implementing the 110 security requirements in NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, again with a current self-assessment in SPRS. A valid, current certification at the required level is a condition of award, and the requirement flows down to subcontractors handling FCI or CUI. If you do not hold the required certification at award, you are ineligible for that award, so this is worth starting early. DARPA points to Project Spectrum and the APEX Accelerators program as free resources for compliance and registration support.

Two more considerations matter. Fundamental versus non-fundamental research: proposers should indicate whether their scope is fundamental research, though the Government has sole discretion to decide, and non-fundamental awards can carry publication restrictions requiring DARPA permission before publishing. And DARPA's Fundamental Research Risk-Based Security Review process will produce risk assessments of proposed senior and key personnel on fundamental research awards, adjudicated before final award and run separately from the scientific review.

How Proposals Are Evaluated

Proposals are evaluated on four criteria, listed here in descending order of importance. First, Overall Scientific and Technical Merit, meaning the approach is innovative, feasible, achievable, and complete, with detailed technical rationale, logically sequenced tasks, clearly defined deliverables, and identified technical risks with feasible mitigations. Second, Potential Contribution and Relevance to the DARPA Mission, meaning the effort supports the national security technology base and DARPA's mission to make pivotal early investments, with any intellectual property restrictions not significantly impeding Government transition. Third, Cost and Schedule Realism, meaning costs and schedule are realistic, substantiated, and aggressive but achievable. Fourth, Proposer's Capabilities or Related Experience, meaning demonstrated ability to manage complex efforts and deliver on performance, budget, and schedule.

How to Apply

There is a mandatory abstract phase. You must submit a conforming abstract before you can submit a full proposal. If your abstract is deemed non-conforming, any subsequent full proposal for that abstract will also be deemed non-conforming and removed from consideration. If DARPA does not recommend you submit a full proposal, you may still submit one as long as your abstract was conforming, but a favorable abstract response is not a guarantee of selection. Proposers who do not submit an abstract, or who submit a non-conforming abstract, cannot submit a full proposal.

Key dates, all in Eastern Time. Proposal abstract due date is August 27, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. The question submittal window closes September 15, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Full proposals are due September 25, 2026, at 4:00 p.m.

Submission channels depend on instrument. Proposers requesting procurement contracts or Other Transaction Agreements submit through the Broad Agency Announcement Tool (BAAT). Proposers requesting cooperative agreements submit through Grants.gov and must also complete the SF424 (R&R) Budget form. Required attachments include the Abstract Summary Slide Template (Attachment A), Abstract Instructions and Template (Attachment B), Proposal Summary Slides (Attachment C), the Volume I Technical and Management template (Attachment D), the Volume II Cost template and DARPA Cost Proposal Spreadsheet (Attachments E and F), and, for Other Transactions, the Model OT for Prototype and the Schedule of Milestones and Payments (Attachments G and I). All technical, contractual, and administrative questions must go to PINPOINT@darpa.mil rather than to the Program Manager directly.

Is PINPOINT a Fit for Your Startup?

This is a strong fit if you are a deep-tech or hard-science company working in MEMS, precision sensors, photonics and levitated systems, nonlinear dynamics and control, or advanced microfabrication, and you have a genuinely novel physical approach to inertial sensing rather than an incremental MEMS improvement. It is also a fit if you can partner with a university group that brings the underlying physics, since the IIP option and the ACA structure both anticipate industry and academic teaming. It is a poor fit if your concept is evolutionary, if the core research is already complete and you are really seeking manufacturing funds, or if you have already received a positive funding decision for the same concept from DARPA or another agency, since all three of those conditions can make a submission non-conforming.

The timeline is compressed. With the abstract due August 27, 2026, the practical window to shape a competitive concept, line up any university partner, and produce a conforming abstract is short, so it is worth moving quickly.

Frequently Asked Questions

‍ ‍

What is the DARPA PINPOINT program?

‍ ‍

PINPOINT is a DARPA Defense Sciences Office Broad Agency Announcement (HR001126S0016) seeking revolutionary inertial measurement unit technology for navigation in GPS-denied environments. It funds novel micro-scale inertial sensors that use nonlinear physics, co-designed with adaptive control systems, to deliver near navigation-grade performance in a low size, weight, power, and cost package.

‍ ‍

When are PINPOINT proposals due?

‍ ‍

A conforming abstract is due August 27, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, and it is mandatory. The question submittal window closes September 15, 2026. Full proposals are due September 25, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. You cannot submit a full proposal without first submitting a conforming abstract.

‍ ‍

How much funding does PINPOINT provide?

‍ ‍

DARPA does not publish a total program budget or a per-award ceiling for the base Phase I effort in this BAA. Multiple awards are anticipated, and award value is negotiated based on your proposed technical approach, cost, and schedule. The only fixed figure stated is for the optional Industry Immersion Program, which provides up to $160,000 per embedded student.

‍ ‍

How long is the PINPOINT program?

‍ ‍

Phase I is 24 months. A 24-month Phase II is anticipated but is not being solicited now and is not guaranteed. Only Phase I is open under this announcement.

‍ ‍

What kind of technology is DARPA looking for?

‍ ‍

DARPA wants revolutionary inertial sensors operating in highly nonlinear regimes, using approaches such as electromagnetically levitated proof masses, non-linear resonators, high-velocity tethered microsystems, and non-linear mechanical structures, tightly co-designed with real-time adaptive control. Evolutionary improvements to existing MEMS devices are specifically excluded.

‍ ‍

Can startups and small businesses apply to PINPOINT?

‍ ‍

Yes. All responsible sources may propose, and small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, HBCUs, and minority institutions are encouraged, though there is no set-aside. Both U.S. and non-U.S. sources may participate subject to export control and security requirements.

‍ ‍

What award instruments are available under PINPOINT?

‍ ‍

DARPA may award procurement contracts, cooperative agreements, or Other Transaction Agreements for Prototype. The instrument affects your submission channel, your cost-sharing obligations, and whether CMMC applies.

‍ ‍

Does PINPOINT require CMMC certification?

‍ ‍

CMMC applies to awards that take the form of procurement contracts, and DARPA anticipates requiring CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 depending on whether the work involves Federal Contract Information or Controlled Unclassified Information. A valid, current certification at the required level is a condition of award, so it is worth starting the SPRS self-assessment process early.

‍ ‍

What are the evaluation criteria for PINPOINT?

‍ ‍

In descending order of importance: Overall Scientific and Technical Merit, Potential Contribution and Relevance to the DARPA Mission, Cost and Schedule Realism, and the Proposer's Capabilities or Related Experience.

‍ ‍

What is the Associate Contractor Agreement requirement?

‍ ‍

Phase I performers must enter an Associate Contractor Agreement that mandates sharing certain program-generated data with other funded teams, with firewalls to protect proprietary intellectual property. This broad data-sharing requirement is expected to relax in Phase II so teams can protect proprietary hardware and manufacturing IP.

‍ ‍

How do I ask DARPA questions about PINPOINT?

‍ ‍

Email all technical, contractual, and administrative questions to PINPOINT@darpa.mil. Do not email the Program Manager directly, as that may delay or prevent a response. The question submittal window closes September 15, 2026.

Army xTech|Search 10 Competition: SBIR Topic ARM26BX05-NP011

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

xTech|Search 10 is an open-topic Army prize competition that identifies groundbreaking, commercially traded technologies with the potential to deliver game-changing capabilities to the Army. Companies enter by submitting a white paper to the xTech|Search 10 competition, with a pending deadline. The Army will competitively down-select up to 16 finalists, and only those finalists become eligible to submit a Phase I Army SBIR proposal under topic ARM26BX05-NP011 for a potential follow-on award of up to $300,000 over a 6-month period of performance. Proposals submitted to this topic by non-finalists or non-participants will not be evaluated.

What is the xTech|Search 10 Competition?

xTech|Search 10 is an open-topic competition run by the Army SBIR/STTR Program and the Army xTech Program. Its purpose is to surface technologies that already have strong commercial traction and that could also provide a disruptive advantage to the Army. Rather than defining a single narrow problem, it invites companies across many technology domains to demonstrate why their solution is best in class and how it maps to Army modernization priorities.

The competition functions as a front door to the Army SBIR program. It is structured as a prize competition first and a funding pathway second. Companies compete on the strength of a white paper, the Army selects up to 16 finalists, and only those finalists are permitted to submit a Phase I SBIR proposal under this topic. This structure means the competition itself is the gate, and the SBIR award is the prize on the other side of it.

Because it is open-topic, xTech|Search 10 is one of the most accessible entry points into Army non-dilutive funding for deep-tech startups that may not have a background in defense work but can clearly articulate a technical and commercial advantage.

How much funding is available?

Finalists who are selected from the xTech|Search 10 competition become eligible to submit a Phase I Army SBIR proposal under topic ARM26BX05-NP011. The Phase I award carries a cost limit of $300,000 with a 6-month period of performance.

The full xTech|Search 10 competition also awards cash prizes to finalists across the stages of the competition. The complete prize structure, including finalist cash awards and the number of participants advanced at each stage, is detailed in the official xTech|Search 10 competition RFI. Companies should review that RFI directly for the exact prize amounts, since those figures are set at the competition level rather than in the SBIR topic itself. The link is provided in the timeline section below.

The headline number to plan around is the up to $300,000 Phase I SBIR follow-on, which is the funding that flows to finalists who successfully submit and win a Phase I proposal.

What technologies is the Army looking for?

xTech|Search 10 is deliberately broad. The Army has aligned four portfolios of priority interest for this competition, each tied to critical Army needs, but the program explicitly welcomes proposals in any other technology domain that could provide a disruptive advantage. If your technology does not fit neatly into one of the four portfolios but you can show it delivers a game-changing capability, you are still encouraged to apply.

The competition maps to the following Army modernization priorities: Advanced Computing and Software, Advanced Materials, Human-Machine Interfaces, Integrated Network Systems-of-Systems, Integrated Sensing and Cyber, Microelectronics, Quantum Science, and Trusted AI and Autonomy. The projected security requirement for this topic is CMMC Level 1, which is the entry-level cybersecurity maturity tier.

What are the four priority portfolios?

The Army has identified four portfolios of priority interest for xTech|Search 10, each with core technology components:

Sensors. Electronic devices used to measure physical parameters, often enabling enhanced automation through the Internet of Things.

Immersive and Wearables. Integration or extension of the real world through digital or simulated reality, including augmented, virtual, and mixed reality. The wearables component focuses on smart electronic devices worn by or attached to the user to gather data or provide insight during mission operations.

AI/ML. Technology that incorporates human intelligence into machines, along with machine learning approaches that allow systems to learn from data without explicit programming.

Contested Logistics and Sustainment. Strategic and operational technologies for planning and executing the movement and maintenance of forces and materials under adversarial conditions.

Who is eligible to apply?

To be eligible for the Phase I Army SBIR award that follows this competition, a company must meet standard SBIR eligibility criteria:

It must be a for-profit company.

It must be more than 50 percent owned and controlled by U.S. citizens or permanent resident aliens, or by other for-profit small businesses that are themselves U.S.-owned and controlled.

It must have 500 or fewer employees, including all affiliates.

Companies should also review the full xTech|Search 10 competition RFI for any competition-specific eligibility requirements, including rules about prior xTech participation and the ability to obtain a CAGE code.

What is the timeline and key deadline?

The single most important date for any company interested in this topic is the white paper deadline for the xTech|Search 10 competition.

Deadline is still TBD as of 8/17. White paper submission deadline for the xTech|Search 10 competition, submitted through the official competition portal.

The competition RFI and application link are available here: https://www.xtech.army.mil/competitions/

After the white paper stage, the Army competitively down-selects to up to 16 finalists. Only those finalists are invited to submit a Phase I Army SBIR proposal under topic ARM26BX05-NP011. Companies that did not participate in the competition, or that participated but were not named finalists, are not permitted to submit and will not have proposals evaluated.

Because the competition is the gate, the white paper deadline closes off the entire pathway to this topic. Companies interested in the up to $300,000 Phase I award should treat the white paper as the true application and build their timeline backward from that date.

What happens in each SBIR phase?

Phase I. Accepting submissions from xTech|Search 10 finalists only, with a cost limit of $300,000 and a 6-month period of performance. In Phase I, the company completes a feasibility study that demonstrates its competitive technical advantage relative to other commercial products, and develops concept plans for applying the technology to Army modernization priorities. The study should identify the technology at both the component and system levels, provide supporting literature for technical feasibility, highlight existing performance data, show application opportunities to a broad base of customers outside defense, present a commercial market strategy, explain how the technology addresses the Army modernization area, and include a technology development roadmap. At the end of Phase I, the company provides a concept demonstration showing a high probability that continued development will yield a mature Phase II product.

Phase II. The company produces prototype solutions that a Soldier can easily operate. These prototypes are provided to select Army units for evaluation by Soldiers. The company also delivers a technology transition and commercialization plan covering both DoD and commercial markets.

Phase III Dual Use. The company matures the technology developed in Phase II to TRL 6/7 and produces prototypes to support further development and commercialization. The Army evaluates each product in a realistic field environment, and based on Soldier feedback the company updates the prototypes toward a final design configuration. Phase III work is funded through non-SBIR sources.

How do you actually enter and win?

The path is sequential and unforgiving of missed steps. First, submit a competitive white paper to the xTech|Search 10 competition by TBD. Second, get selected as one of up to 16 finalists in the Army down-select. Third, submit a Phase I Army SBIR proposal under ARM26BX05-NP011 as an invited finalist. There is no way to skip the competition and go straight to the SBIR proposal.

The plain guidance for self-assessment is straightforward. If you can achieve the competition objective better than any other company on the market, you have a strong likelihood of advancing and you should apply. Open-topic competitions reward companies that can crisply demonstrate a defensible technical edge and real commercial traction.

What does a competitive white paper need to show?

Winning white papers for open-topic competitions tend to do four things well. They demonstrate genuine commercial traction, such as revenue, customers, partnerships, or independent validation, rather than a concept alone. They articulate a clear and defensible technical advantage over existing commercial products. They draw a direct line from the technology to a specific Army modernization priority or operational need. And they show a credible path to maturation and transition, so the Army can see how the capability reaches Soldiers.

Because the topic is open, judges are comparing very different technologies against one another. Clarity, evidence, and a sharp articulation of why your solution is game-changing carry more weight than technical density.

Why this topic matters for deep-tech startups

xTech|Search 10 is one of the lowest-friction ways for a commercially oriented startup to enter the Army SBIR ecosystem. It does not require a prior defense relationship, it rewards existing commercial traction, and it offers a structured pathway from a single white paper to a $300,000 non-dilutive Phase I award, with cash prizes along the way and direct engagement with Army stakeholders. For a seed to Series A company with a strong product and no in-house grants team, the competition format lets you compete on the strength of your technology and your traction rather than on your familiarity with federal proposal mechanics.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO provides end-to-end support for the xTech|Search 10 pathway, including competition strategy, white paper development, and full Phase I SBIR proposal writing for finalists, along with administrative and compliance support. We help you position your commercial traction and technical advantage for the open-topic judging criteria, map your technology to the right Army modernization priority, and build the timeline backward from the TBD deadline so nothing slips.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Army SBIR topic ARM26BX05-NP011?
It is the Phase I SBIR topic tied to the xTech|Search 10 prize competition. Only finalists selected from the xTech|Search 10 competition are eligible to submit a Phase I proposal under this topic. Proposals from non-finalists or non-participants will not be evaluated.

How do I apply to xTech|Search 10?
You apply by submitting a white paper to the xTech|Search 10 competition through the official Army xTech portal at https://www.xtech.army.mil/competitions/ by the TBD deadline. You do not apply to the SBIR topic directly.

When is the deadline?
The white paper submission deadline for the xTech|Search 10 competition is TBD.

How much funding can I receive?
Finalists are eligible to submit a Phase I Army SBIR proposal for up to $300,000 over a 6-month period of performance. The competition also awards cash prizes to finalists, with the full prize structure detailed in the competition RFI.

How many finalists will be selected?
The Army will competitively down-select up to 16 finalists, and those finalists are the only firms eligible to submit a Phase I SBIR proposal under this topic.

Does my technology have to fit one of the four portfolios?
No. The four portfolios of Sensors, Immersive and Wearables, AI/ML, and Contested Logistics and Sustainment are priority areas, but the competition is open-topic and welcomes any technology domain that could provide a disruptive advantage to the Army.

Who is eligible to apply?
Eligibility for the Phase I SBIR follows standard SBIR rules: a for-profit company, more than 50 percent U.S.-owned and controlled, with 500 or fewer employees including affiliates. Review the competition RFI for any competition-specific eligibility requirements.

What security or compliance level is required?
The projected requirement for this topic is CMMC Level 1, the entry-level cybersecurity maturity tier.

Can I submit a Phase I proposal without entering the competition?
No. Only xTech|Search 10 finalists may submit a Phase I proposal under this topic. There is no direct submission path.

Who is the point of contact?
The technical point of contact is the Army xTech Mailbox at usarmy.xtech@army.mil.

OSW26TZ05-NV003: High Throughput Wafer Scale Manufacturing of Custom Achromatic Infrared Meta Optics

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26TZ05-NV003 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 STTR topic under the DoW STTR Program funding a cost-effective, high-throughput, wafer-scale manufacturing process for custom achromatic meta-optic components operating in the mid wave and long wave infrared bands. Because this is an STTR topic, the small business must formally partner with a U.S. nonprofit research institution or university, performing at least 40 percent of the work while the research partner performs at least 30 percent. Phase I offers a base award of up to $300,000 over 12 months with a 10-page technical volume limit. This topic is ITAR/EAR restricted. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

Meta-optics replace bulky, multi-element, three-dimensional curved lenses with flat surfaces built from subwavelength-scale meta-units, dramatically cutting the size, weight, and complexity of infrared systems. That makes them attractive for portable IR vision systems, UAV surveillance platforms, and wearable electronics. A single meta-optic element can also be engineered to extract or encode information like polarization, wavelength, and wavefront shape directly from an incoming IR signal, enabling sensing and beam-shaping capabilities that conventional refractive optics cannot match.

The problem holding this technology back is chromatic aberration, along with a manufacturing bottleneck. Existing fabrication approaches, including electron beam lithography, UV immersion lithography, nanoimprint lithography, grayscale lithography, and deep UV projection lithography, are slow, require complex alignment, use expensive tooling, and have limited material compatibility. Most demonstrated achromatic metalenses to date also operate in the visible or near-infrared range rather than the MWIR (3 to 5 microns) or LWIR (8 to 14 microns) bands that matter for military infrared systems.

This topic wants a wafer-scale manufacturing process, compatible with standard semiconductor fabrication infrastructure, that can produce achromatic meta-optic components in high-index, IR-transparent materials across both MWIR and LWIR bands. Phase I focuses on proving the manufacturing process works for the MWIR band specifically, building meta-unit libraries across multiple IR materials, and quantifying performance metrics like phase control resolution, surface flatness for component integration, and the breadth of the meta-atom library. Phase II experimentally validates those Phase I performance targets, expands the meta-atom library into the LWIR band, and focuses on scaling the process to high-volume wafer-scale production without requiring the proposer to own a physical foundry.

Because this is an STTR topic, proposers must have a signed Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with their partnering nonprofit research institution or university, along with an intellectual property and data rights allocation statement between both parties, uploaded as supporting documentation. This topic is also ITAR/EAR restricted, so any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed in detail, including country of origin, visa type, and specific tasks.

Worth noting: the solicitation's evaluation criteria section references weighting toward a "foundation-model-based collaborative AiTR approach," which appears to be boilerplate carried over from a different topic and does not match the meta-optics manufacturing description above. Companies should confirm evaluation criteria directly with the Technical Point of Contact before finalizing a proposal strategy.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: up to $300,000 Phase I period of performance: 12 months Phase I technical volume limit: 10 pages Small business minimum work share: 40 percent of total cost Research institution/university minimum work share: 30 percent of total cost Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Scaled Hypersonics CMMC level requirement: Level 1 Export control status: ITAR/EAR restricted

Who Should Apply

This topic fits small businesses with nanofabrication, photonics, or optical metasurface expertise, particularly those who already have or can quickly establish a research partnership with a university or nonprofit lab active in meta-optics, semiconductor processing, or advanced materials. Because STTR requires a documented Cooperative Research and Development Agreement and an IP allocation statement before submission, companies should start that conversation with a research partner early rather than after the topic is already open.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26TZ05-NV003? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $300,000 for a 12 month period of performance.

Why does this topic require a university partner? This is an STTR topic, not an SBIR topic. STTR requires the small business to formally partner with a U.S. nonprofit research institution or university, with the small business performing at least 40 percent of the work and the research partner performing at least 30 percent, measured by cost.

What documents does the university partnership require? A signed STTR Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between the small business and the research institution, along with an Allocation of Intellectual Property and Data Rights statement between both parties, both uploaded as supporting documents.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. This topic is restricted under ITAR and EAR. Any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa or work permit type, and specific tasks assigned, and participation may be restricted.

What infrared bands does this topic target? Mid wave infrared, 3 to 5 microns, is the primary Phase I focus, with long wave infrared, 8 to 14 microns, added during Phase II.

Does the manufacturing process need to run in a proposer-owned foundry? No. Phase II specifically aims to scale the process to high-volume wafer-scale production without requiring the proposer to own a physical foundry.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-DV014: In-Situ Metrology for Mesa-Wall Integrity in Large Format Small-Pixel Infrared Detector Array Fabrication

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-DV014 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program seeking a non-destructive, quick-turn metrology tool that can screen full wafers for surface damage during small-pixel infrared detector array fabrication. Phase I offers a base award of $314,363 over 9 months with a 20-page technical volume limit. A Direct to Phase II track is available at $2,095,748 over 18 months. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

The Department of War needs large-format, small-pixel focal plane arrays (FPAs) to support sensor platforms across ground, air, maritime, and space domains. As detector manufacturers push pixel sizes smaller to meet this demand, the fabrication process becomes more fragile. During pixel isolation, mesa-wall surface damage and unwanted surface currents introduce noise that degrades FPA performance and can compromise mission effectiveness.

This topic calls for a prototype instrument that can non-destructively assess mesa-wall integrity across full wafers up to 150mm in diameter, as well as piece parts, at cryogenic temperatures. The tool needs to work across both major detector material systems used in this space: Antimony-based III-V Type-II Superlattice (T2SL) and Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT), covering short wave through long wave infrared bands. The government is prioritizing in-situ measurement approaches that let fabricators catch and correct defects during processing rather than after the fact.

Companies with backgrounds in semiconductor metrology, surface current mapping, non-destructive testing, or infrared detector characterization are well positioned here. The solicitation explicitly encourages proposers to partner with prime contractors or commercial T2SL and MCT growth and processing houses, since access to real fabrication environments will matter for a credible Phase II and Phase III transition.

Phase I is about proving the underlying physics and measurement concept, using representative test structures or coupons rather than full production wafers. Phase II scales that concept into a working full-wafer prototype validated against traditional baseline testing at an actual DoW laboratory or FPA fabrication house. Phase III targets integration into IRFPA production lines, with clear relevance to sensors for air, space, maritime, and missile platforms.

Companies pursuing the Direct to Phase II track must already have completed proof-of-concept work independent of any prior federally funded SBIR or STTR Phase I effort, and must document that work thoroughly: technical reports, test data, prototype designs, and performance results.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $314,363 Phase I period of performance: 9 months Phase I technical volume limit: 20 pages Direct to Phase II award: $2,095,748 Direct to Phase II period of performance: 18 months Direct to Phase II technical volume limit: 20 pages Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: Technical and Business Assistance (TABA) funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance CMMC level requirement: Level 1

Who Should Apply

This topic fits small businesses with proven capability in semiconductor surface characterization, cryogenic test instrumentation, or infrared detector fabrication diagnostics. Companies without direct access to T2SL or MCT wafer fabrication should plan to line up a partnership with a growth or processing house before proposing, since the solicitation specifically calls this out as encouraged.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-DV014? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes on that date.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $314,363 for a 9 month period of performance.

Can a company skip Phase I and apply directly for Phase II? Yes. This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals, but only from companies that can document completed proof-of-concept work meeting the Phase I objectives, performed independently of any prior SBIR or STTR federal funding.

What materials does the metrology tool need to work with? The tool must be able to assess both Antimony-based III-V Semiconductor Type-II Superlattice (T2SL) and Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) detector materials, across short wave to long wave infrared bands.

Does this topic require a security clearance? Phase I work is expected to be performed at the Unclassified//CUI level, and classified proposals are not accepted. A Phase II contract may require facility and personnel clearances if the work becomes classified.

What size wafers does the system need to measure? The system should accommodate wafers up to 150mm in diameter as well as piece parts.

Who evaluates these proposals? Government technical evaluators may come from Army DEVCOM C5ISR Center, Army DEVCOM Army Research Lab, the Naval Research Laboratory, and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project, using the SBIR/STTR TABA Request Form.

OSW26BZ05-NP016: Desktop Instrument for Measuring Boresight Error as a Function of Incident Angle

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-NP016 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding a benchtop instrument that measures boresight error and boresight error slope in infrared window materials as a function of temperature, temperature gradient, and angle of incidence. Phase I offers a base award of $300,000 over 12 months with a 10-page technical volume limit. This topic does not have a Direct to Phase II track. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

Interceptor vehicles use infrared tracking systems to determine an object's position along the line of sight between the vehicle and the target. That line of sight passes through a protective window or dome. In supersonic and hypersonic flight, aerodynamic heating creates a temperature gradient across that window, which distorts the measured line of sight relative to the actual line of sight. That distortion is called boresight error, or BSE. As the vehicle's angle changes, BSE changes too, in a pattern known as boresight error slope, or BSES. Negative BSES is especially problematic because it prevents the guidance system from compensating accurately.

Right now, characterizing BSE and BSES relies on wind tunnel and flight testing, which are accurate but expensive and hard to schedule. This topic seeks a desktop testing apparatus that reproduces the relevant thermal and angular conditions without high-speed air flow, so companies developing novel IR window materials, including ceramics intended to reduce BSE and BSES, can iterate faster and de-risk expensive flight testing.

The instrument needs to measure unmounted or mounted IR window materials between 25mm and 100mm wide, across an incidence angle range of 0 to 75 degrees, temperatures from room temperature up to 1200 degrees Celsius, and at three wavelengths: 633 nanometers, 4 microns, and 10 microns. It needs an integrated computer and a usable graphical interface, plus the ability to create and measure a controlled temperature gradient between the top and bottom surfaces of the sample.

This is a strong fit for companies with backgrounds in optical instrumentation, laser and detector system integration, thermal testing, or materials characterization equipment. Phase I is a design and simulation exercise, with mockups of the data collection software as the deliverable. Phase II builds and delivers a working instrument to the Army Research Laboratory, including installation, training, and documentation.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $300,000 Phase I period of performance: 12 months Phase I technical volume limit: 10 pages Direct to Phase II: not available for this topic Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Scaled Hypersonics CMMC level requirement: Level 1

Who Should Apply

Companies building optical test and measurement equipment, especially those with experience in laser-based sensing, cryogenic or high-temperature test rigs, or hypersonic materials testing, should take a close look at this topic. Prior experience delivering instrumentation to a government laboratory is a plus given the Phase II delivery and training requirement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-NP016? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $300,000 for a 12 month period of performance.

Is Direct to Phase II available for this topic? No. This topic is only open to standard Phase I proposals.

What temperature and angle range does the instrument need to cover? The instrument must operate from room temperature to 1200 degrees Celsius and across incidence angles from 0 to 75 degrees, at three wavelengths: 633nm, 4 microns, and 10 microns.

What is delivered at the end of Phase II? A working instrument delivered to the Army Research Laboratory, along with documentation on safe operation and standard operating procedures, ideally with troubleshooting guides and training manuals, plus on-site installation and training.

Does this topic require flight testing experience? No. The entire point of the topic is to build a benchtop alternative to wind tunnel and flight testing, so simulation and bench-level instrumentation expertise is what matters most.

Who evaluates these proposals? Government technical evaluators may come from Army DEVCOM C5ISR Center, Army DEVCOM Army Research Lab, the Naval Research Laboratory, and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-NP017: Sensing Algorithms for Bandwidth Efficient Edge Radars (SABER)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-NP017, known as SABER, is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding decentralized radar sensing algorithms that let three or more radar nodes cooperate on target detection and identification while minimizing the communications bandwidth needed between them. Phase I offers a base award of $306,500 over 6 months with a 10-page technical volume limit. This topic does not have a Direct to Phase II track and is ITAR/EAR restricted. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

The Navy's Distributed Maritime Operations concept and related tactical imaging efforts depend on networking physically separated radar nodes into a single cooperative sensing mesh. Done well, this overcomes the limits of any single platform, including single points of failure and limited angular coverage, especially in contested and cluttered environments. The catch is that this shifts the performance bottleneck from individual sensors to the communications network connecting them. Streaming raw radar data gives the best imaging fidelity but overwhelms available bandwidth, while sharing only processed features or images saves bandwidth but degrades collaborative imaging quality.

SABER is looking for architectures and algorithms that jointly optimize communications and target inference across a decentralized radar network, processing data locally at each node and transmitting only the actionable intelligence or compressed imaging features needed for the network to fuse. Proposals need to specify their level of data fusion, whether decentralized signal-level, feature-level, or decision-level, along with the expected bandwidth requirements at each level.

Phase I is modeling and simulation heavy. The government wants proposers to demonstrate architecture feasibility, identify bandwidth bottlenecks as the key technical barrier, establish quantitative baselines for both network capacity and inference accuracy, and deliver a working proof-of-concept software implementation alongside a Phase II development plan aimed at hardware-in-the-loop testing.

This is a strong fit for companies with backgrounds in radar signal processing, distributed sensor networks, communications-constrained algorithm design, or information fusion. Because this topic is ITAR/EAR restricted, any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed in detail, including country of origin, visa type, and specific statement of work tasks, and foreign national participation may be restricted under U.S. export control law.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $306,500 Phase I period of performance: 6 months Phase I technical volume limit: 10 pages Direct to Phase II: not available for this topic Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Applied Artificial Intelligence CMMC level requirement: Level 1 Export control status: ITAR/EAR restricted

Who Should Apply

Companies working on radar signal processing, distributed sensing, communications-efficient AI, or multi-node information fusion for maritime or ground surveillance are the target audience here. Given the short 6 month Phase I period and 10 page limit, proposers should already have a strong technical foundation to build on rather than starting from a blank page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-NP017? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $306,500 for a 6 month period of performance.

Is Direct to Phase II available for this topic? No. This topic is only open to standard Phase I proposals.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. SABER is restricted under ITAR and EAR. Any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa or work permit type, and the specific tasks assigned, and participation may be restricted.

How many radar nodes does the architecture need to support? The topic calls for cooperative inference across tactical networks with three or more nodes, scaling to more than two nodes for Phase II demonstration purposes.

What kind of data fusion should proposers plan for? Proposals should clearly state their fusion approach, whether decentralized signal-level, feature-level, or decision-level fusion, along with the anticipated bandwidth requirements for that approach.

What is the Phase I deliverable? A functional proof-of-concept software or algorithmic implementation, a technical feasibility assessment based on modeling and simulation results, and a Phase II development plan.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-DV018: Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Radar Data Compression

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-DV018 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding deep learning approaches, such as autoencoders or transformer models, that compress raw radar data into low-bit representations for efficient storage and transmission without losing radar utility. Phase I offers a base award of $314,363 over 12 months with a 20-page technical volume limit. A Direct to Phase II track is available at $2,095,748 over 24 months. This topic is ITAR/EAR restricted. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

Next-generation radars, particularly synthetic aperture radar (SAR), generate enormous data rates that traditional image compression methods were never designed to handle. This topic is looking for neural compression approaches built specifically for the complex SAR data domain, using complex-valued neural network encoders and decoders that learn to compress raw pulses or range-Doppler maps into a compact latent representation with minimal distortion, while preserving the features that matter for detection and analysis.

Phase I is about designing and training autoencoder networks for radar data, benchmarking rate-distortion performance against classical compression methods on recorded datasets, and measuring the impact on target detection performance. Phase II moves the best-performing model onto embedded hardware for real-time compression, which likely involves quantization-aware training to reduce bit depth, and tests it against live radar feeds to evaluate image and track fidelity after decompression. Phase III integrates the technology into fielded radars or data links.

The dual-use angle here is broad. Any high-rate sensor stream benefits from this kind of compression, from unmanned aerial vehicle radar feeds to high-resolution weather radar data, which gives commercially minded proposers a real path to Phase III beyond DoW customers.

This is a strong fit for companies with deep learning expertise applied to signal processing, particularly teams with experience in autoencoders, transformer architectures, or complex-valued neural networks, combined with radar or SAR domain knowledge. Because this topic touches sensitive radar signal processing, it is ITAR/EAR restricted, and any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed in detail.

Companies pursuing Direct to Phase II need documented proof-of-concept work that meets the Phase I objectives, independent of prior federally funded SBIR or STTR Phase I work, along with a clear commercialization discussion.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $314,363 Phase I period of performance: 12 months Phase I technical volume limit: 20 pages Direct to Phase II award: $2,095,748 Direct to Phase II period of performance: 24 months Direct to Phase II technical volume limit: 20 pages Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Areas: Applied Artificial Intelligence and Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance CMMC level requirement: Level 2 (Self) Export control status: ITAR/EAR restricted

Who Should Apply

Companies with strong applied machine learning teams, particularly those who have worked on compression, autoencoders, or generative models for scientific or sensor data, are a natural fit. Radar or SAR domain experience is a meaningful differentiator given the specificity of the technical objectives.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-DV018? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $314,363 for a 12 month period of performance.

Can a company skip Phase I and apply directly for Phase II? Yes. This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals, but only from companies that can document completed proof-of-concept work meeting the Phase I objectives, performed independently of any prior SBIR or STTR federal funding.

What kind of AI approach is the government looking for? Deep learning based compression, specifically autoencoder or transformer architectures, ideally using complex-valued neural networks suited to SAR and radar data.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. This topic is restricted under ITAR and EAR. Any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa or work permit type, and specific tasks assigned, and participation may be restricted.

What is the required CMMC level? CMMC Level 2 (Self) is the projected requirement for this topic.

What civilian applications does this technology have? Weather radar data networks and medical imaging streams are both cited as dual-use applications with commercial potential.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-DV019: Collaborative Distributed Swarm Radar

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-DV019 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding signal processing methods that combine information from multiple small radar sensors, such as those carried on unmanned aerial systems, to improve collaborative target detection and identification. Phase I offers a base award of $314,363 over 12 months with a 20-page technical volume limit. A Direct to Phase II track is available at $2,095,748 over 24 months. This topic is ITAR/EAR restricted. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

A network of radar-equipped UAS or dispersed sensors can act as a collaborative distributed radar team, pooling information to improve detection, tracking, and identification of ground or maritime targets beyond what any single radar in the network could achieve alone. This topic is looking for the sensor swarm geometries, data fusion schemes, and signal processing algorithms that make that teaming approach actually work.

Phase I is modeling and simulation focused. Proposers need to design candidate swarm geometries and fusion schemes, develop the signal processing algorithms, and use M&S to quantify the expected performance improvement of a radar team compared to a single radar operating alone. Deliverables include a feasibility study, system design, algorithm details, and the software implementation, along with any synthetic data generated during the study.

Phase II moves from simulation to hardware, building a prototype swarm of three or more sensors to validate the Phase I signal processing approach against real collected data, and quantifying performance gains for target detection, tracking, and identification relative to a single radar system. Phase II also requires a commercialization analysis based on what is learned during the hardware phase.

The dual-use potential is significant. Distributed radar swarms have clear civilian applications in environmental monitoring, such as fleets of gliders mapping terrain, as well as broader surveillance and emergency response use cases.

This is a strong fit for companies with experience in radar signal processing, sensor fusion, swarm robotics or UAS platforms, and distributed systems architecture. Because this topic touches sensitive radar and networked sensing technology, it is ITAR/EAR restricted, and any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed in detail.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $314,363 Phase I period of performance: 12 months Phase I technical volume limit: 20 pages Direct to Phase II award: $2,095,748 Direct to Phase II period of performance: 24 months Direct to Phase II technical volume limit: 20 pages Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance CMMC level requirement: Level 2 (Self) Export control status: ITAR/EAR restricted

Who Should Apply

Companies with radar signal processing expertise, particularly those who have worked on multi-sensor fusion, swarm coordination, or UAS-mounted sensing payloads, are well positioned for this topic. A credible plan for building a three-plus node hardware testbed by Phase II will strengthen any proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-DV019? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $314,363 for a 12 month period of performance.

Can a company skip Phase I and apply directly for Phase II? Yes. This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals, but only from companies that can document completed proof-of-concept work meeting the Phase I objectives, performed independently of any prior SBIR or STTR federal funding.

How many sensors are needed for the Phase II prototype? Phase II requires a prototype swarm of three or more sensors to test the collaborative signal processing approach in hardware.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. This topic is restricted under ITAR and EAR. Any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa or work permit type, and specific tasks assigned, and participation may be restricted.

What civilian applications does this technology have? Environmental monitoring, such as glider swarms mapping terrain, along with broader surveillance and emergency response applications.

What does Phase II require besides the hardware demonstration? A commercialization analysis based on what the company learns during Phase II hardware testing, in addition to the signal processing software and collected data.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-DV020: Joint Radar & Communication Waveforms

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-DV020 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding dual-functional radar communication techniques that embed information directly into radar waveforms, reducing or removing the need for a separate communications datalink. Phase I offers a base award of $314,363 over 12 months with a 20-page technical volume limit. A Direct to Phase II track is available at $2,095,748 over 24 months. This topic is ITAR/EAR restricted. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

Radar sensing and communications conventionally require separate hardware on surveillance platforms, which adds complexity, weight, and latency. This topic is looking for waveform diversity or modulated pulse techniques, sometimes called Dual-functional Radar Communication (DFRC), that encode arbitrary communication data directly into the radar pulse itself rather than sending it over a dedicated communications link.

Phase I calls for developing chirp or phase-modulated encoding schemes that embed additional information into a radar pulse, then validating through simulation or lab testbeds that a receiver can decode that embedded data while still correctly processing the radar return itself, with minimal degradation to radar signal processing performance. Phase II moves this into hardware, implementing the encoding and decoding scheme on a prototype radar and running real hardware tests to evaluate bit error rate against radar performance and study real-time operation requirements.

The commercial angle is meaningful here. Similar techniques could support civilian networks, such as embedding vehicle ID or geolocation into automotive radar pulses, or adding redundancy to automatic dependent surveillance broadcast systems used by the FAA.

This is a strong fit for companies with expertise in radar waveform design, RF communications, signal processing, or dual-function sensing systems. Because this topic touches sensitive radar and communications technology, it is ITAR/EAR restricted, and any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed in detail, including country of origin, visa type, and specific tasks.

Companies pursuing Direct to Phase II must document completed proof-of-concept work meeting the Phase I objectives, performed independently of any prior federally funded SBIR or STTR Phase I effort.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $314,363 Phase I period of performance: 12 months Phase I technical volume limit: 20 pages Direct to Phase II award: $2,095,748 Direct to Phase II period of performance: 24 months Direct to Phase II technical volume limit: 20 pages Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance CMMC level requirement: Level 2 (Self) Export control status: ITAR/EAR restricted

Who Should Apply

Companies with radar waveform design experience, RF and communications engineering backgrounds, or prior work on dual-function radar communication systems should take a close look here. A credible plan for hardware validation by Phase II strengthens the proposal significantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-DV020? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $314,363 for a 12 month period of performance.

Can a company skip Phase I and apply directly for Phase II? Yes. This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals, but only from companies that can document completed proof-of-concept work meeting the Phase I objectives, performed independently of any prior SBIR or STTR federal funding.

What is Dual-functional Radar Communication? It is an approach where communication data is encoded directly into a radar's transmitted waveform, such as through chirp or phase modulation, rather than sent over a separate communications link.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. This topic is restricted under ITAR and EAR. Any proposed use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa or work permit type, and specific tasks assigned, and participation may be restricted.

What civilian applications does this technology have? Embedding vehicle ID or geolocation data into automotive radar pulses, and adding redundancy to automatic dependent surveillance broadcast systems used in aviation.

What does Phase I need to demonstrate? That embedded communication data can be recovered from a radar pulse with minimal impact on the radar's own signal processing performance, validated through simulation or lab testbeds.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

OSW26BZ05-NV021: Co-packaging Digital Readout Integrated Circuits and Photonics for Advanced Infrared Imaging

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

OSW26BZ05-NV021 is a 2026 OSW-Reliance 21 SBIR topic under the DoW SBIR Program funding the design and fabrication of a readout integrated circuit with a photonic digital output for infrared sensors operating in cryogenic environments. Phase I offers a base award of $314,363 over 9 months with a 20-page technical volume limit. This topic does not have a Direct to Phase II track. Proposals are due September 23, 2026 and must be submitted through DSIP.

Overview

Modern infrared digital focal plane arrays can generate over 20 gigabits per second of data at standard video framerates in large formats. Getting that bitstream off the sensor in a cryogenic environment is genuinely hard, because it requires balancing electrical, mechanical, and thermal constraints simultaneously. Today's state of practice tops out around 3 gigabits per second per channel at 10 picojoules per bit, and the power that electrical output drivers consume becomes significant enough to shorten cryocooler lifetimes in large-format arrays.

Photonic integrated circuits (PICs) offer a potential 10x or greater improvement in bandwidth, latency, and energy consumption compared to standard electrical input/output approaches. The problem is that every demonstration to date has bolted an off-the-shelf readout integrated circuit (ROIC) to a PIC chiplet on an interposer, which reduces thermal load from wiring but does little to actually reduce overall power consumption. This topic wants a genuinely monolithic solution: either full integration of electronics and photonics on a single silicon wafer, or foundry-level integration of a photonic and electronic layer before detector hybridization, using one of the CMOS/PIC-capable foundries now offering 45 to 180 nanometer processes.

Phase I is about exploring foundry fabrication options for co-packaging or vertically integrating a digital ROIC with photonic chiplets, evaluating feasibility factors like bonding, metallization, planarity, and impurities, and producing an initial PIC design suited to cryogenic operation, along with any needed modifications to existing ROIC designs. Phase II carries this through to full design, tape-out, and fabrication, with cryogenic testing to demonstrate optical output performance, and ideally radiation testing and thermal cycling as well.

This is a strong fit for companies with expertise in photonic integrated circuit design, cryogenic electronics, mixed-signal ROIC design, or foundry-level chip integration. Radiation hardening for space applications is called out as a plus but not a requirement.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I base award: $314,363 Phase I period of performance: 9 months Phase I technical volume limit: 20 pages Direct to Phase II: not available for this topic Proposal deadline: September 23, 2026 Submission portal: DSIP only, no other submission method is accepted Additional funding available: TABA funding, up to $6,500 for Phase I awardees and up to $50,000 per Phase II project Critical Technology Area: Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance CMMC level requirement: Level 1

Who Should Apply

Companies with photonics design capability, cryogenic mixed-signal electronics experience, or access to CMOS/PIC foundry relationships are the right audience here. This topic rewards proposers who can speak credibly to real foundry integration constraints rather than purely theoretical PIC design.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for OSW26BZ05-NV021? The proposal deadline is September 23, 2026. Proposals must be submitted through DSIP before the topic closes.

How much funding is available for Phase I? Phase I offers a base award of up to $314,363 for a 9 month period of performance.

Is Direct to Phase II available for this topic? No. This topic is only open to standard Phase I proposals.

Why does this topic call for monolithic integration instead of chiplet-on-interposer designs? Because chiplet-on-interposer approaches reduce thermal load from wiring but do very little to reduce overall power consumption, which is the actual problem the government is trying to solve for large-format arrays in cryogenic environments.

What data rates is this technology trying to support? State of the art digital infrared focal plane arrays can generate more than 20 gigabits per second, well beyond what current electrical output drivers can handle efficiently in a cryogenic environment.

Is radiation hardening required? No. Design hardening for space and high-radiation environments is called out as advantageous but remains optional for this topic.

What foundry capabilities does this topic assume are available? The topic references several foundries now offering 45 to 180 nanometer CMOS/PIC integration capability as a starting point for proposers.

What is the Phase I deliverable? A comprehensive final report detailing the PIC design, planned ROIC fabrication modifications, and a system integration plan.

Is TABA funding available for this topic? Yes. Phase I awardees may request up to $6,500 in TABA funding, and Phase II awardees may request up to $50,000 per Phase II project.

DTRA SBIR DTR26BZ05-NP001: Novel Technologies for CWMD and Related Threats

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

DTR26BZ05-NP001 is a Defense Threat Reduction Agency SBIR open topic seeking ways to detect radiological or nuclear threats using signals from ordinary military hardware and commercial devices, rather than building new, purpose-built sensors. Phase I awards go up to 250,000 dollars over 7 months. Phase II awards go up to 1,500,000 dollars over 24 months and are only open to Phase I awardees. Proposals are due September 23. The topic is ITAR and EAR restricted.

What This Topic Is Looking For

DTRA exists to help the Department of War detect, deter, and defeat weapons of mass destruction. The agency's problem is that purpose-built radiological and nuclear detection hardware is slow and expensive to develop, test, and field, and the commercial market for that kind of specialized equipment is thin.

This topic flips the approach. Instead of asking for a new sensor, it asks for a way to detect the storage, transfer, or use of WMD and related materials using signals that already exist. That could mean microphones, cameras, motion detectors, passive infrared, or other common sensors already sitting on military platforms or in commercial devices that have nothing to do with radiological detection on their own. The goal is to find a novel use case where ordinary, non-specialized signals or data can serve as an indication and warning capability for WMD threats.

This is structured as an open topic rather than a conventional one, which means DTRA is not specifying a particular technical objective or output up front. Proposers have room to define the use case themselves, provided it fits the broader mission of detecting WMD threats without bespoke sensors. Because it is an open topic, a company may submit only one proposal to it. If more than one proposal is submitted, only the most recently certified one will be evaluated, and all earlier submissions will be marked non-responsive.

Phase I, II, and III Expectations

Phase I is a feasibility study. The deliverable is proof of at least one feasible use case where a non-WMD-specific sensor, signal, or data source can detect a WMD threat or event, including characterization of the use case's applicability, customizability, and effectiveness, plus a proposed course of action for building a model or prototype in Phase II. The final Phase I deliverable is a report documenting the study and that course of action.

Phase II is only open to companies that received a Phase I award on this topic. It focuses on actually building the model or prototype identified in Phase I and testing it against relevant scenarios and data. The deliverable is the model or prototype itself, along with a final report containing an objective assessment of the technology and all test data and outcomes. Phase II proposals need to generally follow the same outline as the Phase I proposal, incorporating lessons learned, and should be ready to submit within 30 days after the Phase I period of performance ends.

Phase III is about refining the technology for broader mission use, improving effectiveness, usability, and sustainability, and delivering both a proven capability and a study of dual use applications spanning defense, government, and commercial use cases.

Funding and Timeline

Phase I award: up to 250,000 dollars for a 7 month period of performance, structured as 6 months of research plus a final month for the report. Phase I awards are issued as fixed-price purchase orders.

Phase II award: up to 1,500,000 dollars for a 24 month period of performance, issued as a definitive cost contract. Only Phase I awardees on this topic may submit a Phase II proposal.

TABA: up to 6,500 dollars for the Phase I project, and up to 50,000 dollars for the Phase II project, which can be split into two 25,000 dollar increments across sequential Phase II usage if needed.

Proposal deadline: September 23. All proposals must be submitted through DSIP, and proposals submitted through any other channel will be disregarded.

Award timeline: selection or non-selection notifications go out within 90 days of the BAA closing date. Selected offers then move through a DTRA acquisition package for contracting officer approval, which typically takes 120 to 180 days to reach contract execution.

Required Proposal Volumes

Every submission needs seven volumes: the Proposal Cover Sheet, the Technical Volume capped at 20 pages for Phase I and 40 pages for Phase II, the Cost Volume using DTRA's required Excel spreadsheet template, the Company Commercialization Report, Supporting Documents, Fraud Waste and Abuse Training, and the Disclosures of Foreign Affiliations webform.

DTRA has one mandatory Supporting Documents requirement beyond the standard package: the Contractor Certification Regarding Provision of Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. If a company has concerns about meeting this certification, it needs to submit a mitigation plan addressing those concerns rather than skip the requirement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for DTR26BZ05-NP001? September 23. Submission is only accepted through DSIP.

Can a company submit more than one proposal to this topic? No. This is an open topic, so a company may submit only one proposal. If multiple proposals are submitted, only the most recently certified one is evaluated, and earlier submissions are marked non-responsive.

What makes this an open topic instead of a conventional one? DTRA has not specified a particular technical objective or output. Proposers get to define the specific use case themselves, as long as it fits the mission of detecting WMD threats using non-specialized sensors, signals, or data sources rather than purpose-built detection hardware.

Can a company propose directly to Phase II? No. Phase II proposals may only come from companies that already hold a Phase I award on this specific topic.

What kind of company or team fits this topic best? Teams with signal processing, sensor fusion, or data science expertise who can identify a genuinely novel way to repurpose existing military or commercial hardware for detection, rather than teams focused on building new radiological or nuclear sensor hardware from scratch.

Is this topic export controlled? Yes. It is restricted under ITAR and may also fall under EAR. Any planned use of foreign nationals must be disclosed, including country of origin, visa status, and specific tasks.

How competitive is this program? DTRA receives roughly 250 proposals a year across its SBIR program and makes 17 to 20 awards annually, so the overall program is competitive, though award rates vary by topic and year.

What does DTRA expect as the final Phase I deliverable? A report proving out at least one feasible use case, along with a proposed course of action for building a model or prototype in Phase II. Phase I is a feasibility study, not a working prototype.

DARPA STTR DPA26TZ05-DV003: SPEED DIAL (Scalable Platform for Enterprise Engineering and Deployment towards Mathematics for the Discovery of Algorithms and Architectures)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Quick Answer

DPA26TZ05-DV003, known as SPEED DIAL, is a DARPA Direct to Phase II STTR topic seeking a platform that brings AI-driven algorithm discovery out of the research lab and into everyday engineering workflows. The award is worth up to 750,000 dollars over a 12 month base period, with an optional 1,250,000 dollar, 12 month extension, for a total period of performance up to 24 months. Proposals are due September 23. Because this is an STTR topic, a formal research institution partnership is required.

What This Topic Is Looking For

DARPA's DIAL program already proved that AI can autonomously discover novel, high-performance algorithms, for example rediscovering the Kalman Filter using Transformers, rediscovering wavelets using genetic programming, and generating optimal meta-solvers for physics simulations. The problem is that these discovery engines are stuck in research environments. Engineers and scientists cannot yet pull a bespoke, AI-discovered algorithm into their actual workflow before running their standard process.

SPEED DIAL asks for a framework that closes that gap, built through a partnership between a university with deep algorithmic discovery expertise and a company representing the US industrial base. The Phase II work breaks into five tasks: building a unified discovery and deployment platform where engineers can define a problem space, boundary conditions, and hardware constraints to kick off discovery; embedding pervasive discovery engines, such as Transformer-based or genetic programming approaches, directly into the platform so industrial partners can discover bespoke algorithms for their own proprietary data; curating a version-controlled library of discovered algorithms organized by problem class with performance benchmarks; building in-context integration tools that pair a problem description with its algorithmic solution so retrieval is context-aware, and that deploy the algorithm into existing environments like MATLAB, Simulink, COMSOL, or custom C++ without manual code rewriting; and demonstrating the whole framework on at least two distinct defense-relevant problems such as hypersonic vehicle design, submarine acoustic signature analysis, or digital twin modeling.

A key requirement running through the whole topic is interpretability. Discovered algorithms cannot be black boxes. They need to be composed of transparent building blocks that a domain expert can actually understand, verify, and eventually certify.

DP2 Feasibility and Phase II Structure

This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals only, so no separate Phase I award will be made. Feasibility documentation needs to show three things already accomplished outside the STTR program: a track record of using methods like Transformers, genetic programming, or reinforcement learning to discover novel algorithms that beat state-of-the-art approaches in domains like time-series analysis, data compression, or partial differential equations; quantitative performance gains, with DARPA citing prior results like a 1000x improvement from AI-discovered wavelets and a 6.35x reduction in iterations for acoustic and sonar solvers as reference points; and evidence that the discovered algorithms are interpretable rather than opaque.

Phase II runs through a set of fixed milestones: a Month 4 system architecture document with an initial library of at least 5 foundational algorithms, a Month 8 prototype of the ambient discovery engine running in the background without interrupting the primary engineering workflow, a Month 12 demonstration of in-context deployment into a standard commercial environment without manual code rewriting, a Month 14 interim demonstration on a defense-relevant problem showing more than 10 percent improvement in computational efficiency, a Month 18 beta release of the full closed-loop platform, and a Month 24 final demonstration on a second major defense application along with the final software release and Phase III transition plan.

Phase III Outlook

On the defense side, DARPA points to faster and more accurate hypersonic vehicle design through better CFD simulation, improved sonar and radar signal processing for target detection, optimization of logistics networks in contested environments, and faster development of digital twins for military systems. Commercially, the same discovery framework applies to advanced manufacturing process optimization, financial modeling for risk analysis and trading, accelerated molecular dynamics simulation for drug discovery, and semiconductor chip layout optimization.

Funding and Timeline

Base award amount: up to 750,000 dollars for a 12 month period of performance.

Option amount: up to 1,250,000 dollars for an additional 12 months, bringing the total period of performance to 24 months.

TABA: DARPA offers up to 6,500 dollars per Phase I project and up to 25,000 dollars for the initial Phase II award.

Proposal deadline: September 23. Technical questions must be submitted by September 16, since DARPA does not answer questions submitted within 7 calendar days of the closing date.

STTR Requirements

Because this is an STTR topic, the proposing small business must partner with a qualifying research institution, and the topic itself is explicitly framed around a university-company partnership: a university bringing deep expertise in algorithmic discovery, paired with a company representing the US industrial base that can embed the tools into a real engineering workflow.

Proposal Format

This topic uses the standard Technical Volume format rather than the white paper and slide deck format. The Technical Volume splits into Part One, Feasibility Documentation, capped at 10 pages, and Part Two, the Technical Proposal, capped at 20 pages. A separate Phase II commercialization strategy section is required and capped at 5 pages, placed as the last section of the Technical Volume and not counted against the main page limit.

All proposals go through DSIP and require the standard seven volumes: cover sheet, technical volume, cost volume, Company Commercialization Report, supporting documents, Fraud Waste and Abuse training, and the Disclosures of Foreign Affiliations webform, which must be completed as a webform and will not be accepted as a PDF upload.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for DPA26TZ05-DV003? September 23. Technical questions must be submitted by September 16.

Is this a Phase I or Phase II award? Phase II only. This topic accepts Direct to Phase II proposals exclusively, so proposers must document feasibility already achieved outside the STTR program rather than receiving a separate Phase I award.

Why does this topic require a research institution partner? This is an STTR topic, and the underlying concept is explicitly built around a university and industry partnership, pairing algorithmic discovery expertise from academia with a company able to deploy that work into real engineering practice.

What does interpretability mean for this topic specifically? Discovered algorithms cannot function as black boxes. They need to be built from transparent components that a domain expert who is not an algorithms specialist can understand and eventually verify or certify, which DARPA treats as essential for real-world adoption.

What page limits apply to the proposal? 10 pages for feasibility documentation, 20 pages for the technical proposal, and a separate 5 page commercialization strategy that does not count against those limits.

Is cost sharing required? No. Cost sharing is permitted under this BAA but is not required and will not be used as an evaluation factor.

What kind of team fits this topic best? A university partner with strength in algorithm discovery methods such as genetic programming, reinforcement learning, or Transformer-based approaches, paired with a small business that has real engineering workflow experience and a credible path to embedding the tool into commercial or defense engineering software.