MassVentures START (SBIR TARgeted Technologies) Program Round 1 Grants

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

MassVentures’ START program provides non-dilutive grants to help Massachusetts companies that have already won a federal Phase II SBIR or STTR award (or equivalent) move toward commercialization. The program’s stated goals include commercialization, job growth, manufacturing expansion, and statewide innovation.

Who should apply?

1. You are a Massachusetts company that conducts R&D, manufacturing, and commercialization primarily in MA, and is committed to continuing to do so.

2. You have received a federal Phase II SBIR or STTR award (or equivalent).

3. You expect to spend START funds primarily in Massachusetts.

Timing note: There is no strict requirement on when your qualifying Phase II was received. If it was more than five years ago, you’re expected to explain why it’s still commercially relevant today.

Funding snapshot:

16 winners will receive $100k in Round 1 in 2026 (paid in two installments). Round 1 winners will be eligible to compete for 7 Round 2 awards in 2027 for $200k. Round 3 is finally for $500k for 3 awardees.

Key dates:

• Application deadline: Monday, February 23, 2026 — 11:59 PM ET

• Top 16 selected - March 23, 2026

• Winners Notified - April 30th, 2026

• Winner’s breakfast - May/June

What you must submit:

1. 2026 Application Cover Sheet (contact information)

2. 1000-word summary covering: the technology, its commercial potential, and the team

3. 3-minute video

4. Cover page of your SBIR Phase II award contract (proof of award)

How applications are evaluated:

This RFP references learning “what makes a successful application” and “what judges look for” during the info session, but it does not list formal scoring criteria in the text provided.
What is explicitly required in the application suggests emphasis on:

• Clear explanation of the technology

• Credible commercial potential

• Strength of the team

Practical guidance for CEOs

1. Treat the 1000-word summary as your “investment memo”: what it is, why it wins, how it becomes a business.

2. Use the 3-minute video to make the story memorable and concrete: problem → solution → proof → market → plan.

3. If your Phase II is older than 5 years, be direct about why it still matters commercially now.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO helps founders and CEOs decide quickly whether this opportunity is worth pursuing and how to win it. We translate the START RFP into plain-English strategy, pressure-test fit and competitiveness, shape a clear commercialization narrative for the 1,000-word summary and 3-minute video, and manage the application end-to-end so your team stays focused on building the business. Our goal is to reduce time burden, avoid preventable mistakes, and submit a credible, CEO-ready application aligned with what MassVentures is explicitly asking for.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

With a flat rate of $2500, you’d work with our grant writing team to put the application together and submit before the February 23rd deadline.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

5G Deployable Systems – Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) is conducting market research to identify deployable 5G systems that can support DHS operational needs. This Request for Information (RFI) is intended to collect technical, operational, and cost-related information from vendors to inform potential future procurement decisions. Responses must be submitted through the Vulcan platform by March 2, 2026 at 12:00 PM Eastern Time.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500K to $5 million in the future, however this is currently only a Request for Information (RFI) only.

What could I use the funding for?

DHS is requesting information on deployable 5G system capabilities.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

While no funding is initially provided, responding to this RFI will offer strategic benefits, including early visibility into DHS operational requirements, increased exposure to DHS S&T stakeholders, and the opportunity to be considered for future solicitations informed by this market research. DHS also notes that it may conduct one-on-one meetings and system demonstrations with selected respondents as part of its evaluation process.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Responses must be submitted no later than March 2, 2026 at 12:00 PM Eastern Time via the Vulcan platform. No funding will be awarded under this RFI but funding could be awarded via other methods in Q4 2026 (estimate).

Where does this funding come from?

No funding is associated with this RFI. It is issued solely for information gathering and market research purposes by DHS S&T.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any vendor capable of providing deployable 5G systems that meet DHS operational needs may submit a response. Respondent technologies must be at Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 or higher.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DHS explicitly requests information from systems that:

• Are deployable and operationally relevant to DHS missions

• Support 4G LTE, 5G NSA, 5G SA, and/or ORAN technologies

• Demonstrate TRL 7, 8, or 9 maturity

• Include detailed performance, security, and cost data

• Can be demonstrated in a 1-to-2-day operational demonstration

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. DHS explicitly states that it does not intend to receive proprietary, trade secret, or confidential business information, and all submissions become the property of the U.S. Government. Participation does not transfer any intellectual property rights, and DHS is not obligated to issue a future solicitation.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The RFI requires a detailed technical response covering system design, performance, security, deployment, cost models, and supporting documentation. Preparation time will vary, but respondents should expect a non-trivial effort comparable to a technical white paper plus cost and demonstration planning materials.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Position, Navigation, & Timing at the Tactical Edge – Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC) is seeking Assured and Alternate Position, Navigation, & Timing (APNT) technologies that enable military forces to operate effectively in GNSS-denied, contested, or degraded environments. This call supports market research via Vulcan scout card submissions for solutions applicable to dismounted soldiers, vehicles, maritime platforms, and uncrewed systems. Submissions are due by April 30, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500K to $5 million. No funding amount is specified in the source materials. This call is explicitly positioned as market research, not a guaranteed funding award however almost certainly selected technologies will inform future procurement, trials, and funded programs.

What could I use the funding for?

Cyber & Specialist Operations Command is interested in Assured and Alternate Position, Navigation, & Timing (APNT) technologies for use by dismounted soldiers or on vehicle platforms, both static and on-the-move. The proposals should be able to contribute to the ability for Force Elements to continue to operate in a GNSS denied, contested, or degraded environment.

Potential use cases could include:

• Dismounted Soldier

• Maritime Mobility (Surface and Sub-Surface)

• Land Mobility Vehicles

• Uncrewed Vehicles (in all domains)

Technologies should be compatible with existing systems (i.e. plug and play) and may be hardware based or software based (for example, data fusion engines).

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond any future funding opportunity, participation offers meaningful indirect benefits:

Government Validation and Strategic Visibility:
Engaging directly with CSOC provides early validation from the UK Ministry of Defence’s lead command for cyber and specialist operations, signaling relevance to NATO-aligned defence priorities.

Positioning for Follow-On Contracts:
Market research submissions often inform future trials, procurements, and funded defense programs, positioning companies early in the acquisition pipeline.

Access to a High-Value Defence Ecosystem:
CSOC operates across cyber, intelligence, special operations, and electromagnetic domains, creating downstream opportunities for collaboration with allied forces, primes, and specialist units.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Submission Deadline: April 30, 2026 at 18:59 CDT

No funding or award timeline is specified in the materials.

Where does this funding come from?

This opportunity is issued by the Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC) of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence. No specific funding vehicle or appropriation is identified.

Who is eligible to apply?

Everyone - including US Companies.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Based on the stated interests, strong submissions are likely to demonstrate:

• Proven or plausible performance in GNSS-denied or contested environments

• Applicability across multiple platforms or domains

• Plug-and-play compatibility with existing systems

• Maturity suitable for military evaluation or experimentation

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Duplicate scout cards are not permitted and will be removed.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Initial participation requires submission of a Scout Card. For a first time applicant this will take 20-40 hours to submit without assistance from BW&CO.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 for the Scout Card Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Project WILLFUL – Next Generation Specialist Vehicles – Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

Project WILLFUL is a long-term UK Ministry of Defence R&D and experimentation initiative led by Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC) to inform a parallel land manoeuvre programme over the next 10–15 years. US Companies are eligible to apply. Through Collaborative Working Innovation Contracts (CWICs, the UK analogue to a CRADA), CSOC will collaborate directly with industry to mature and demonstrate novel technologies on a light, high-mobility 4x4 specialist vehicle platform. Submissions are accepted via Scout Cards until 01 January 2027.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500K to $5 million. Funding is expected to be provided through CWICs and related collaborative R&D and capability demonstration activities over the lifetime of the project.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding and collaboration under Project WILLFUL may be used to research, develop, integrate, and demonstrate novel technologies aligned to the following Technology Interest Items:

Alternative Powertrains. Realising the benefits of electric motors at the axels or wheel stations without sacrificing the requirement to run on traditional and dirty fuels. Novel hybrid solutions that are optimised for performance, not emissions. Reduce training, cognitive load on the operator and maintenance. Afford 'silent' approach (reduced audio and thermal signature). Increase exportable power for sub-systems. Future proof for the point where pure EV becomes viable. Improve torque characteristics.

Increasing Payload. Powered Trailers. UGVs. Modified third axles. Novel chassis construction.

C-UAS. Hard and soft kill.

Signature Management. Either through physical profile, such as additive manufacturing solutions or modifiable body kits. Or mounted reductive systems for thermal, audio, IR, EM, RF and counter MLM-enabled object recognition.

Exportable Power. Generation and distribution. Power harvesting.

Protection. Modular ballistic protection. Modular blast protection. Soft kill DAS.

Low profile and light weight Remote Weapons Station. Specifically, options that can be either fitted or removed quickly without specialist tools or can be hidden within vehicle architecture and brought to bear when needed.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct R&D collaboration, participation in Project WILLFUL offers significant indirect benefits. Working directly with CSOC and specialist end users provides early insight into future UK land manoeuvre requirements and long-term capability direction. Successful contributors gain credibility through direct Ministry of Defence collaboration, access to spiral acquisition pathways over a 10–15 year horizon, and positioning for follow-on programmes as requirements mature. The use of CWICs enables deeper technical collaboration than traditional procurement mechanisms.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Vendors are encouraged to submit Scout Cards as early as possible, as engagement, experimentation opportunities, and CWIC pathways may be pursued on a rolling basis as funds and collaboration slots are allocated. Early submissions are more likely to influence ongoing research, experimentation, and requirement-setting activities.

The Scout Card submission window opened on 26 January 2026 at 18:00 CST and formally closes on 01 January 2027 at 17:59 CST. Project WILLFUL is expected to continue throughout the full spiral delivery of the associated land manoeuvre programme over 10–15 years, with capability interest areas and CWICs reviewed periodically.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding and collaboration are provided by the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, delivered through Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC) using procurement reform mechanisms and Collaborative Working Innovation Contracts (CWICs).

Who is eligible to apply?

There is no initial threshold requirement for vendors at first consideration. However, to proceed beyond initial review and toward CWIC award, vendors will be required to share information at UK SECRET. Security accreditation may inform down-selection.

As a baseline, vendors should seek to secure:

• Facility Security Clearance

• Suitable personnel security clearances (UK SECRET or equivalent)

• United Kingdom Security Vetting (GOV.UK clearance levels)

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Projects most likely to succeed are those that:

• Demonstrate novel technologies aligned to the listed Technology Interest Items

• Can integrate solutions onto a light, high-mobility 4x4 military-spec platform

• Support rapid experimentation, spiral development, and evolving requirements

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Subsequent participation beyond initial consideration will require the ability to handle information classified at UK SECRET. Security accreditation and vetting may restrict participation for vendors unable to meet these requirements.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Initial participation requires submission of a Scout Card. For a first time applicant this will take 20-40 hours to submit without assistance from BW&CO.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 for the Scout Card Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Science & Technology Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA 24-01) – Department of Homeland Security

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) is funding scientific and technical research projects that significantly improve or increase capabilities across the Homeland Security Enterprise. This Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA 24-01) supports near-term operational needs, foundational science, and future/emerging threat research through contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, and Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs). Apply before funds are fully utilized.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500K to $5 million. The LRBAA does not specify minimum or maximum award sizes. Funding amounts depend on the technical merit of the proposal, relevance to DHS mission needs, and availability of funds. DHS may fund all, some, or none of the proposals received, and multiple awards are anticipated

What could I use the funding for?

Funding under this LRBAA may be used for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) activities aligned with DHS Science & Technology Directorate mission needs. DHS is currently seeking projects across the following priority research topic areas. See full topic descriptions here.

Counter Terrorism and Homeland Security Threats (CTHOM)
DHS S&T works to identify individuals or groups that intend to conduct terrorist attacks and/or illicitly move weapons, dangerous goods, and contraband. It also provides assessments of high-consequence attack methods such as CBE threats that terrorists may use to attack the United States.

CTHOM 01: Development of Tools for Test and Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms
DHS S&T seeks development of cost-effective methodologies and tools for training and testing of Machine Learning-based (ML-based) algorithms for detecting explosives and contraband in Computed Tomography (CT) and Millimeter Wave (MMW) images. This includes methods to synthesize training and testing data, methods to perturb empirical data in order to explore and explain algorithm performance characteristics, and tools to assess the completeness and diversity of training and test data sets.

CTHOM 03: Novel Approaches and Locations for Explosive Performance Characterization and Testing
Enabling research for the characterization and testing of explosives poses a unique challenge for threat characterization. Innovative tools and methods are needed to provide improvements in evaluating legacy approaches to characterization, adapting state-of-the-art technologies in related disciplines, and integrating emerging innovations.

Secure U.S. Borders and Approaches (BORAP)
DHS secures U.S. borders, territorial waters, ports, terminals, waterways, and air, land, and sea transportation systems. DHS S&T invests in border security research and development for technologies and solutions to prevent illicit movement and the illegal entry or exit of people, weapons, dangerous goods, and contraband.

BORAP 01: Screening at Speed
Screening at Speed seeks to mature transformative technologies that increase aviation security effectiveness from curb-to-gate while dramatically reducing wait times and improving passenger experiences.

BORAP 04: Countering Unmanned Aircraft Systems
The primary objective of this LRBAA is to develop enhanced technologies and methods that allow for the detection, tracking, identification, and mitigation of unmanned aircraft systems under varied terrains and environmental conditions such as dense urban environments, mass gatherings, critical infrastructure, mobile platforms, and remote terrain.

BORAP 07: Detection Canine Technologies
Detection Canine development interests are focused on canine research and development structure and function, development and testing of canine training aids, and independent operational test and evaluation to advance detection canine performance in operational environments.

Secure Cyberspace and Critical Infrastructure (CYBCI)
Protecting individuals and organizations from cyber attacks requires RDT&E, test and evaluation, and the technology transition of advanced cybersecurity and information assurance solutions to secure current and future critical cyber infrastructure.

CYBCI 02: Shared Cyber Resilience
The research and development of improved models of resilience across networked hardware and software systems and organizations, including automated cyber attack mitigation, resilient machine learning approaches, privacy preservation techniques, secure multi-party computing, and human-machine teaming for cybersecurity.

CYBCI 03: Software and Hardware Supply Chain Assurance
The research and development of tools and techniques to ensure the resilience of the data, software, and hardware used to execute homeland security mission functions, including post-quantum cryptography, secure-by-design architectures, microelectronics, IoT, cloud and edge computing, and DevSecOps supply-chain assurance techniques.

CYBCI 04: Trustworthy and Responsible Artificial Intelligence
Research and development to enable DHS to effectively assess AI/ML systems against technical and mission metrics, provide operators an appropriate level of trust and confidence, and inspire trust in the general public toward AI/ML systems deployed by DHS.

CYBCI 05: Advanced and Emerging Data Computation and Analytics
This topic focuses on novel computational and analytic methods and capabilities for large-scale data sets for DHS missions, including real-time analytics, privacy-enhancing technologies, high-performance computing, digital twins, synthetic data, and advanced analytics to improve mission effectiveness and efficiency.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, LRBAA awards provide several indirect advantages:

• Government Validation and Credibility: Selection signals strong technical merit and alignment with DHS mission priorities.

• Pathway to Transition and Deployment: Projects are designed to support operational relevance and transition to DHS components.

• Access to DHS Test and Evaluation Infrastructure: DHS may provide access to government laboratories and operational test facilities where appropriate.

• Stronger Long-Term Commercial and Contracting Potential: DHS-funded R&D can increase credibility with future government customers and partners.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

This LRBAA is open through May 31, 2029 at 11:59 PM ET. Companies should apply as soon as possible while funds are available. Submissions follow a three-step process:

1. Industry Engagement Submission (initial research concept)

2. Virtual Pitch (by invitation only)

3. Written Proposal (by invitation only)

Typical DHS response timelines (subject to change):

• Industry Engagement feedback: ~10 business days

• Virtual Pitch evaluation: ~21 business days

• Written Proposal evaluation: ~21 business days

Award timing depends on evaluation outcomes and funding availability.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate (DHS S&T) through the Office of Procurement Operations.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include:

• U.S. small businesses and large businesses

• Academic institutions

• Government laboratories and Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs)

• Nonprofits and research organizations

Foreign or foreign-owned entities may participate but are subject to export control, foreign disclosure, and other federal review requirements. There are no set-asides, but DHS strongly encourages small business participation.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals are evaluated based on:

• Alignment with DHS mission needs and topic relevance

• Scientific and technical merit of the proposed approach

• Degree of innovation and potential capability improvement

• Operational relevance and transition potential

• Reasonableness of cost and feasibility of execution

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• Proposal preparation costs are not reimbursable

• Only unclassified materials may be submitted

• Mature commercial products and support services are not eligible

• Participation in later proposal stages is invitation-only

• Export control, IP, and data rights requirements apply

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Without BW&CO’s assistance the Industry Engagement submission would typically take 35-50 hours.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 for the Industry Engagement Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) is open through June 22, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET, with white papers accepted on a rolling basis throughout the open period.

This BAA solicits innovative basic research, applied research, advanced technology development, and prototype efforts that advance naval aviation capabilities and directly support Department of the Navy mission needs.

NAWCAD may make awards using contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or Other Transaction (OT) agreements depending on the nature of the work and the level of government involvement required.

Funding & Award Structure

Number of Awards: Multiple awards anticipated

• Estimated: $500K to $5 million. Award Size: Not predetermined; varies based on technical merit, relevance, and available funding

• Period of Performance: Varies by project

Possible Award Instruments:

• Procurement contracts

• Grants

• Cooperative agreements

• Other Transaction (OT) agreements for research or prototypes

The Government reserves the right to fund all, some, or none of the submitted proposals and may fund efforts incrementally or with options.

Research Areas

Advanced Manufacturing (Priority). Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: multi-functional aircraft components to enable mission flexibility and platform interoperability, aircraft part digital repository and large-scale complete part printing, and manufacture-on-demand of Naval aviation assets.

Aeromechanics. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: aerodynamic and flight controls (manned and unmanned), aeromechanics modeling and analysis tools, flight performance, rotorcraft aerodynamics and performance, ship/aircraft aerodynamic interactions, and unmanned aviation and integration including pilot augmentation and automation and UAV autonomous landing flight mechanics.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) (Priority). Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: AI/ML-driven signal and analysis type sensing, complex reasoning, multi-agent based operation and decision making, airspace integration including sense and avoid algorithms, deep reinforcement learning, neural networks, and demand forecasting.

Autonomy (Priority). Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: autonomous air-to-air refueling, autonomous system development, testing, evaluation, verification and validation tools, airworthiness and risk quantification/acceptance, collaborative autonomy, and autonomous system precision takeoff and landing.

Avionics, Sensors & Electronic Warfare. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: multi-modal sensors, passive and active sensor systems (RF, EO/IR, and acoustic), advanced or alternative precision navigation and timing (PNT), advanced computational and open system architectures, advanced signal and image processing, flight information and control systems, and advanced concepts in electronic warfare systems.

Cyber (Priority). Areas of research may include but are not limited to the following: high accuracy threat detection, cyber effects modeling, reverse engineering, behavioral analysis, intrusion, adaptive cybersecurity, simulation and interface research, concolic testing, and systems configuration management.

Data Science & Visualization. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: predictive modeling algorithms, complex big-data environments, data access, storage and retrieval, data visualization techniques, risk assessment and uncertainty quantification, and statistical analysis.

Digital Engineering (Priority). Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: advancements in the use of Digital Twin technology to support predictive maintenance, automated sustainment environments, diagnostics and prognostics, digital communication of system requirements using model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and Systems Modeling Language (SysML) views, and engineering models and virtual environments to test designs across broader parameters than what live testing permits.

Human Systems. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: human performance assessment and modeling, cognitive performance and workload, human-machine interface and teaming, protective equipment, controls and displays, ergonomics, anthropomorphic measurement, virtual environments, human factors engineering (social, behavioral, health, and cultural), cognitively enhanced operator-state monitoring, prediction, and recommendation, and human-machine fusion AI-supported operator enhancement.

Hypersonic Systems. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: external and internal high-speed aerodynamics, multi-physics modeling and simulation, hypersonic system testing and evaluation, high-temperature and high-specific-strength materials, structures and coatings, guidance, navigation and control, and advanced air-breathing propulsion.

Materials and Aircraft Structures. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: additive manufacturing, corrosion prevention, non-destructive inspection, structural repair and repair processes for metals and ceramics, polymers and composites, analysis and simulation of aircraft structures, structural mechanics, fouling, low observable materials, high-temperature materials, low-temperature icing-resistant materials, and life management of airframes.

Mechanical Systems. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: fire and ice protection for aviation systems, fuel containment, hydraulic systems, pneumatic systems, and landing gear systems analysis.

Power and Propulsion Systems. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: reliability engineering, fuel systems, prognostics and diagnostics, energy storage and efficiency, air-breathing engines, fuels and lubricants, electrical power generation, auxiliary power, low observable signature technologies, propulsion life management, mechanical and drive systems, and affordable small- to medium-scale propulsion systems.

Quantum (Priority). Areas of research may include but are not limited to the following: precise self-reliant onboard navigation and threat detection, secure communication and sensing capabilities, nitrogen vacancy diamond sensing, quantum encryption, and quantum computing.

Secure Communications & Networks (Priority). Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: resilient data and communications networks for command and control, architecture, analysis and software development, information assurance including blockchain networks and security, platform and system health monitoring, effective data transfer of communications and video, and end-to-end security integration in software development for autonomous applications operating in dynamic and contested environments.

Support Equipment. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: launch and recovery equipment, forward-deployed sustainment and resupply, rapid assessment and repair technologies for contested environments, electromagnetics, high-energy generation and control, environmental sensing, prognostics and health monitoring, automatic testing of hardware and software, displays, advanced maintenance technologies, information systems and intelligent agents, and advanced computer and data processing applications.

Test and Evaluation Engineering. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: telemetry, communications, data links and data acquisition, signature technologies, mission system testing, system-of-systems testing environments, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), extended reality (XR), target engineering, airborne threat simulation, integrated battlespace simulation (Live Virtual Constructive Environments), hardware-in-the-loop testing, flight instrumentation, ground radar analysis, test article configuration, navigation and identification, manned-unmanned teaming, advanced training systems including instructional techniques and strategies, and game-based training.

Warfare Analysis. Areas of research include but are not limited to the following: operational suitability, signal extraction, clutter reduction, modeling and simulation, maritime effectiveness, vulnerability and capability-based assessment, and conceptual aircraft design.

NAWCAD may also consider submissions outside these areas if the white paper involves the development of novel-based capabilities with potential to enhance naval capabilities.

Who Should Pay Attention

• Small businesses, startups, and non-traditional contractors (explicitly encouraged)

• Mid-size and large defense R&D firms

• Universities and research institutions

• Teams with novel sensing hardware, algorithms, or system concepts

This is an unrestricted solicitation. Cost sharing is allowed but not required. Foreign entities may not serve as primes.

Deadline

White Paper Deadline: June 22, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. Only proposers whose white papers are deemed of interest will be invited to submit a full technical and cost proposal.

Evaluation Criteria

Proposals are evaluated using the following criteria, in descending order of importance:

1. Technical Approach – Innovation, feasibility, completeness, and risk mitigation

2. Potential Contribution & Naval Relevance – Alignment with NAWCAD and Navy mission needs

3. Cost – Realism and consistency with the proposed technical approach

Proposals are not evaluated against each other but on their individual merit and relevance.

Bottom Line:

1. NAWCAD has flexibility to award OTs, which can be more startup-friendly than FAR-based contracts

2. Successful prototype OTs may be eligible for noncompetitive follow-on production awards

3. White paper quality is critical; there is no guarantee of a Phase II invitation

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant on your own, preparing an White Paper under this BAA will likely take 20–50 hours in total. BW&CO offers services to save you time and increase your likelihood of success.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the White Paper Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most AFRL proposal projects requiring 10-20 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review solicitation here.

Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) Multi-Spectral Sensing Technologies R&D (MuSTeR) BAA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Air Force Research Laboratory is seeking innovative research and development in advanced radio frequency (RF) and electro-optical / infrared (EO/IR) sensing technologies to support future air, space, and command-and-control sensor systems.

White Papers submissions are due May 20th, 2026 at 5:00pm ET.

This BAA supports basic research, applied research, and advanced technology development, with an emphasis on advancing the state of the art and transitioning capabilities to future Air Force systems.

How much funding would I receive?

Total Program Value: ~$250M (across all awards)

1. Typical Award Size: ~$100K to $10M

2. Period of Performance:

   • Individual awards: 12–48 months

   • Overall BAA effort: up to 60 months

3. Award Volume: Multiple awards anticipated (but not guaranteed)

Research Areas

Multiband Multifunction Radio Frequency Sensing (RYMF)

1. Multiband Multifunction Array Development

2. Fully Adaptive Radar

3. Advanced Digital Multifunction Arrays

Laser Radar Technology (RYMM)

4. Laser Radar Imaging, Systems, Components, and Applications Passive Radio Frequency Sensing (RYMP)

5. Passive Radio Frequency Sensing Distributed Radio Frequency Sensing (RYMS)

6. Waveform Phenomenology, Design and Applications

7. Sensor Information Processing and Integration

EO Target Detection & Surveillance (RYMT)

8. Passive Electro-optic and Infrared Sensor Technology

9. Novel EO/IR Hardware and Algorithms

10. Hyperspectral Imaging Technology

11. Standoff High Resolution Imaging (SHRI)

12. Infrared Search and Track Technology

13. Passive EO/IR Space-Based Sensing

Who Should Pay Attention

• Small businesses, startups, and non-traditional contractors (explicitly encouraged)

• Mid-size and large defense R&D firms

• Universities and research institutions

• Teams with novel sensing hardware, algorithms, or system concepts

This is an unrestricted solicitation. Cost sharing is allowed but not required. Foreign entities may not serve as primes.

How the Process Works

Step 1: White Paper

• Rolling acceptance through May 20, 2026

• 6 pages, technical summary + ROM cost

• Used to determine Air Force interest

Step 2: Full Proposal

• Invitation-only

• Requested from white papers that meet AFRL needs

• Technical merit is the top evaluation factor
  

How Proposals Are Evaluated

White Paper Criteria (Equal Weight):

• Alignment with BAA technical areas

• Government interest

• Novelty and technical advancement

• Availability of funding based on ROM

Full Proposal Criteria (Descending Priority):

1. Technical innovation and approach

2. Understanding of scope and risks

3. Transition potential to Air Force systems

4. Cost realism
   

Bottom Line:

This is a long-running, high-dollar AFRL BAA designed to continuously onboard cutting-edge sensing technologies. If your company is building novel RF, EO/IR, or multispectral sensing capabilities, this BAA is a durable entry point into Air Force R&D funding—starting with a relatively low-cost white paper.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant on your own, preparing an White Paper under this BAA will likely take 20–50 hours in total. BW&CO offers services to save you time and increase your likelihood of success.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most AFRL proposal projects requiring 10-20 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review solicitation here.

Tactical Technology Office (TTO) Office-Wide BAA - DARPA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The DARPA Tactical Technology Office (TTO) is soliciting innovative executive summaries and proposals to demonstrate revolutionary defense platforms, systems, and manufacturing approaches that enhance the nation’s ability to rapidly build, adapt, and sustain force structures. Awards may be made using multiple instrument types, and proposals are accepted on a rolling basis through June 22, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500K to $5 million. DARPA anticipates making multiple awards, but no minimum or maximum award size is specified in the solicitation. Award amounts will be determined based on technical scope, merit, and cost realism.

What could I use the funding for?

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Tactical Technology Office (TTO) is soliciting innovative executive summaries and proposals in the following focus areas:

1. Design/Build/Buy – Using innovative design approaches throughout the system lifecycle to acquire new defense systems, from disrupting systems engineering processes to reimagining test, certification, and accreditation. This includes (1) new design approaches to make manufacturable designs or to dramatically reduce human engineering effort; (2) new approaches to fabrication that enable rapid start-up, reduced production lead times, and frequent changes to military systems; (3) testing and validation approaches that dramatically shorten the timeline from initial delivery to full military utility.

2. Surge and Sustain – Developing technologies that make existing military systems easy to replenish and abundantly available at time of need. Builds upon the legacy of public and private cooperation for national security to make and maintain existing systems rapidly, on-demand, and at high volume, ensuring that the U.S. can win a long-term conflict. This focus area includes (1) development of manufacturable lower-cost systems with “good-enough” capabilities; (2) adaptive manufacturing solutions that allow shifting production seamlessly among products; (3) approaches to broaden and revitalize the supply chain to permit ready use of alternative suppliers for defense products and components; and (4) methods to rapidly leverage non-defense production capabilities and knowledge for defense applications.

3. Long Range Effects – Creating new systems and approaches that enable decisive military effects at distances from the tactical to strategic in areas where anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) strategies are employed by an adversary. This includes (1) approaches that increase range, or which provide alternative paths for access that circumvent A2/AD; (2) systems or technologies to enable constant presence within an adversary’s A2/AD zone; and (3) innovative approaches to re-engineer or re-configure existing systems to confound adversary defenses.

4. Disruptive Innovation – Rapidly fielding novel engineering, technology, and systems approaches that disrupt the battlefield in unexpected or non-obvious ways and change the traditional calculus for military advantage. This focus area includes (1) low-cost autonomous systems that can use mass to overwhelm defensive systems; (2) approaches that disrupt the escalation of hide-and-seek between sensors and stealthy platforms by using decoy and deception or new sensing modalities; (3) capabilities that undermine the readiness or efficacy of adversary systems, creating doubt and deterring attacks.

Submissions that identify potential rapid technological disruption to the tactical battlefield are of interest.

Proposed research should investigate innovative approaches that enable revolutionary advances in science, devices, or systems. Specifically excluded is research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of practice. Individual submissions are not required to include the focus areas outlined above, but proposers are encouraged to address at least one of them, and to make clear which are being addressed.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, awardees gain significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
DARPA selection signals elite technical quality and national-security relevance — often accelerating partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility
Awards frequently lead to increased visibility through DARPA communications, publications, and industry attention.

Ecosystem Access & Collaboration
Awardees join a national innovation community spanning quantum, photonics, microelectronics, and advanced materials — opening doors to long-term collaborations and follow-on opportunities.

Stronger Exit & Acquisition Potential
Non-dilutive support enables deep tech maturation without equity loss. Companies validated by DARPA historically see improved valuation, stronger commercial traction, and increased acquisition interest.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Executive Summary Due: April 17, 2026 at 4:00 PM ET

• Full Proposal Due: June 22, 2026 at 4:00 PM ET

DARPA will generally respond to Executive Summaries within 45 calendar days and notify proposers of Full Proposal selection decisions within 60 calendar days of receipt.

Where does this funding come from?

This funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) within the U.S. Department of Defense, specifically through the Tactical Technology Office (TTO).

Who is eligible to apply?

All responsible U.S. and non-U.S. organizations capable of satisfying DARPA’s needs may apply, including commercial companies, startups, universities, and research institutions, subject to export control, security, and regulatory compliance. Historically Black Colleges and Universities, small businesses, and minority institutions are encouraged to participate.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA evaluates proposals based on the following criteria (summarized from Section II):

• The technical approach is innovative, feasible, and clearly defined

• The work supports DARPA’s mission to create or prevent technological surprise

• The team demonstrates strong expertise and execution capability

• Technical risks are identified with credible mitigation strategies

• Costs are realistic and aligned with the proposed technical approach

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Research must be revolutionary, not incremental

• Full Proposals require a signed “Encourage Full Proposal” letter from DARPA

• Non-conforming or duplicative submissions may be rejected without review

• Certain entities (e.g., FFRDCs and UARCs) are highly discouraged except by exception

• Proposers may not misrepresent data using AI or automated tools

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing an executive summary under this BAA will likely take 20–50 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 10-20 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Review solicitation here.

Generative Optogenetics - DARPA BTO

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office is awarding $1.7M–$1.99M Phase 1 awards to teams developing optically controlled, template-free DNA or RNA synthesis in living cells under the Generative Optogenetics (GO) program. The program uses a staged process beginning with 5-page abstracts due January 16, 2026, followed by invitation-only oral proposals.

How much funding would I receive?

If selected, you would receive a fixed-price Phase 1 award of $1.7M for Research Objective 1 (RO1) or $1.99M if addressing both RO1 and the optional Research Objective 2 (RO2). DARPA anticipates multiple Phase 2 awards for teams that successfully pass the Phase 1 Concept Design Review at month 9.

What could I use the funding for?

The DARPA GO program aims to develop a protein complex, referred to here as a nucleic acid compiler (NAC), that can be expressed within living cells to allow an end user to program genetic instructions into those cells, template-free, using nothing but light to transfer the genetic information to the cells (Figure 1). The central challenge of developing the NAC involves integrating protein domains / subunits for precise optical responsiveness (i.e., optogenetic domains), substrate binding, and enzymatic activity into a functional complex of proteins (i.e., a holoenzyme). While many of these domains have precedence as either engineered or naturally occurring proteins, the challenge lies in developing the interoperability and seamless integration of these domains into a functional holoenzyme, the NAC. Advances in computational design, which allow for accurate prediction of protein structures and binding interactions, are essential for optimizing substrate binding sites, allosteric interactions, and domain integration. These computational tools are crucial for designing the NAC to respond rapidly and predictably to optical signals, enabling the synthesis of long, accurate nucleic acid sequences that can precisely alter cellular function as intended. Moreover, expression of the NAC itself must not be deleterious to host cell function or viability.

To develop the NAC, the GO program consists of two Research Objectives (ROs):

• Research Objective 1 (RO1): De Novo Synthesis

  All GO performers MUST address RO1, which focuses on developing the core capability of the NAC for template-free DNA or RNA synthesis, where optical inputs precisely dictate the sequence of the nucleic acid produced by the NAC in a living cell. A NAC can be designed using a variety of architectures, ranging from extremes of a single, monolithic protein comprised of multiple domains to multi-unit complex (Figure 2). To accomplish this, performers will need to solve three critical challenges: achieving multiplexed optogenetic control, ensuring stability and the precise polymerization of the NAC-nucleic acid sequences, and successfully integrating the molecular components into the NAC.

  1.3.2.1. Multiplexed Optogenetics

  Achieving distinct multiplexed optical programming of the NAC presents a significant challenge, as it requires precise engineering of multiple protein domains capable of responding to distinct wavelengths of light. Currently optogenetic systems have been demonstrated to support up to three distinguishable wavelengths (red, green, and blue) within a cell, but expanding this capability is essential for enabling the NAC to incorporate nucleotides with high precision. This expansion may involve optimizing existing optogenetic domains or developing new ones with improved photophysical properties, such as enhanced spectral separation, faster on/off kinetics, and reduced phototoxicity. By leveraging photons as massless information carriers, these optogenetic domains must facilitate precise molecular motion and interaction, ensuring accurate nucleotide incorporation and enzymatic activity. Computational protein design tools and directed evolution approaches offer potential strategies to overcome these limitations, enabling the multiplexed optical control required for the NAC to function effectively.

  1.3.2.2. Stable and Precise Polymerization

  The NAC must achieve precise polymerization, including initiating synthesis, maintaining processivity to stabilize elongating nucleic acid sequences, and efficiently releasing the synthesized strand to meet program metrics for length and accuracy. The NAC design may need to include strategies to address the challenge of selectively binding the correct nucleotide substrate at the correct time from the mixture of these substrates that exists within the cellular environment. Overcoming this challenge will be necessary for the NAC to achieve desired sequence accuracy metrics for the GO program. Additionally, the stability of the complex formed between the NAC and the nucleic acid sequence it is synthesizing must be sufficient to avoid unwanted dissociations that will result in truncated sequences. Similarly, NACs that synthesize single-stranded nucleic acids will need to overcome issues associated with secondary structures (e.g., hairpin loops) in the DNA/RNA molecule that could interfere with continued synthesis. Achieving stable NAC-based nucleic acid synthesis may necessitate designs that incorporate accessory subunits/domains to improve processivity by holding on to the newly synthesized strand and/or single-stranded binding proteins/domains that hinder the formation of problematic secondary structure in DNA/RNA molecules. Finally, the performers will need to resolve the challenge of releasing synthesized sequences, which may involve strategies such as natural termination signals or engineering inducible cleavage mechanisms.

  1.3.2.3. Integration of Molecular Components

  A fully functional NAC must integrate optogenetic, substrate binding, catalytic, and other domains into a cohesive holoenzyme capable of precise and predictable operation. This integration presents significant challenges, as the domains must interact seamlessly to ensure accurate nucleotide incorporation and overall system functionality. For example, optogenetic domains may need to regulate substrate binding to ensure that nucleotide incorporation into the DNA or RNA sequence aligns precisely with the optical illumination pattern. Similarly, designs involving protein subunit binding must coordinate these interactions with substrate binding domains to maintain synchronization and fidelity. Addressing these challenges may involve strategies such as identifying domains that interact effectively to control the NAC, ensuring synchronous activation and deactivation of multiple NACs within a living cell, and optimizing domain interfaces for efficient communication. Potential approaches include leveraging computational tools to map allosteric pathways, modeling molecular motion to predict domain interactions, and employing high-throughput empirical methods to refine and validate integration strategies.

• Research Objective 2 (RO2): Error Mitigation

  OPTIONAL, GO performers may elect to address RO2 in addition to RO1. Note that GO performers shall not pursue RO2 without addressing RO1. RO2 addresses the challenge of achieving high-fidelity synthesis in NACs by incorporating mechanisms to detect and filter out sequence errors. Some applications of GO technology will necessitate NACs capable of synthesizing longer sequences, and it is anticipated that increasing the length of the sequence will increase the likelihood it contains errors. To this end, RO2 aims to investigate the tradeoffs involved in designing a NAC with enhanced error detection capabilities to meet stricter error tolerance requirements, including how these design choices impact overall NAC performance. There are several potential approaches to address RO2 (Figure 3), an example includes developing doublestranded synthesis methods that incorporate components such as mismatch-binding proteins (e.g., MutS homologs). These proteins can either flag errors for downstream correction or be engineered to degrade faulty sequences, ensuring that only high-fidelity nucleic acid strands are retained. Other strategies may include utilizing base editors to identify nucleotide incorporation errors or synthesizing palindromic sequences that fold onto themselves to increase error detection. RO2 provides an opportunity to explore innovative solutions to error mitigation while considering the tradeoffs in performance, complexity, and scalability inherent to these approaches.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

DARPA Validation & Technical Credibility
Selection by DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO) signals exceptional technical rigor and alignment with DARPA’s high-risk, high-reward biotechnology priorities. This validation materially strengthens credibility with strategic partners, investors, and future government customers.

Non-Dilutive Advancement of Breakthrough Biotechnology
GO awards enable teams to mature foundational, high-risk biological technologies using non-dilutive capital. Companies can advance technically ambitious platforms without sacrificing equity, increasing both technical readiness and enterprise value.

Access to DARPA Program Leadership & Expert Networks
Awardees engage directly with DARPA program managers, technical reviewers, and advisory working groups throughout the program. This access provides rare insight into government priorities, technical expectations, and future transition considerations.

Commercialization Support & Structured Market Exposure
GO performers receive guidance from an Independent Commercialization and Consulting Group (ICCG) and participate in structured commercialization workshops and pitch events. These activities help teams refine business hypotheses, market positioning, and transition strategies alongside experienced investors and operators.

Enhanced Visibility Across the Biotechnology Ecosystem
Participation in a DARPA flagship biology program elevates company visibility across the defense, academic, and commercial biotech ecosystems—positioning awardees as leaders in next-generation genetic and optogenetic technologies.

Stronger Long-Term Exit & Transition Potential
By maturing core technology under DARPA sponsorship and demonstrating government-backed technical progress, companies strengthen their positioning for follow-on funding, strategic partnerships, and long-term acquisition or licensing opportunities.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The process begins with a 5-page abstract due January 16, 2026.. Selected teams are invited to present an in-person Oral Proposal Package. Phase 1 awards follow oral presentations, subject to funding availability. Phase 1 runs 12 months, with a major down-selection at month 9. Phase 2, if awarded, runs an additional 30 months

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) within the Department of Defense, through DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), using Other Transaction (OT) for Prototype authority.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include U.S. and non-U.S. companies, startups, universities, nonprofits, and research institutions, including nontraditional defense contractors and small businesses. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) and government entities may apply with additional eligibility documentation. All performers must be able to accept an OT agreement and comply with export control and CUI requirements.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive teams will demonstrate deep expertise in protein engineering, optogenetics, enzymatic nucleic acid synthesis, and computational biology, with a credible plan to integrate these into a functioning system in living cells. DARPA emphasizes technically bold, high-risk approaches that directly address program metrics rather than incremental biology research.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. The program excludes human and animal research, embryonic stem cells, bioprospecting for new natural proteins, substantial hardware development, in vitro assembly workflows, and systems that operate outside the central dogma. Phase 2 work involves Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), requiring NIST 800-171–compliant systems and DARPA security coordination.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most teams should expect 4–6 weeks to prepare a competitive abstract, including technical framing, team formation, and compliance review. Invited teams will need additional time to prepare a detailed Oral Proposal Package, cost models, and milestone plans under DARPA’s OT structure

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

$4,000 for Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Space Domain Awareness Solutions CSO

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Space Force Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) is awarding up to $6 million through a multi-year Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) to small businesses developing innovative Space Domain Awareness (SDA) solutions. Companies submit short white papers under specific Areas of Interest (AOIs), with AOI-2025_01 closing January 20, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding amounts are determined at the AOI and proposal level. For AOI-2025_01, awards are expected to come from a shared ~$1.5M funding pool across multiple AOIs. The Government may fund all, some, or part of a proposed solution, depending on mission priority, technical merit, and available funds.

What could I use the funding for?

SpOC/S33Z – SDA Capability Enhancement seeks research, development, and prototyping efforts that advance state-of-the-art methods for managing, analyzing, and exploiting space sensor data. The dynamic and challenging SDA environment requires novel approaches that go beyond traditional software development, with emphasis on experimental techniques, proof-of-concept demonstrations, and technology maturation that can transition into operational use.

Technical Focus Areas (TFAs)

Offerors may propose solutions aligned with one or more of the following TFAs. All submissions should emphasize the R&D aspect of their approach, with deliverables expected to include prototypes, models, and/or experimental frameworks rather than production-ready systems.

• TFA 1: Scalable, Adaptable Data Management Tools

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Research and prototyping of new database or data architecture approaches for storing and managing sensor observations, state vectors, and metadata.

  • Experimental tools for data format translation/conversion to enable integration across platforms or analysis pipelines.

  • Innovative methods for tagging, indexing, and organizing traditional and non-traditional sensor data (e.g., radar, EO/IR, passive RF).

• TFA 2: Modeling and Analytics for Enhanced Accuracy and Optimization

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Development and validation of new modeling techniques to determine LEO sensor performance requirements.

  • Research into space environmental models to support phased array radar performance assessments.

  • Exploration of methods for dynamic weighting of sensor observations.

  • Prototyping of modeling/simulation tools to assess the impact of sensor network topology changes.

  • Experimental accuracy assessment tools for passive RF systems, mobile sensors, or degraded data environments.

• TFA 3: Agile Software Prototyping and Transition

  Desired Capabilities:

  • Exploration of approaches to integrate or reuse government-developed astrodynamics models/toolkits in new prototypes.

  • Rapid prototyping of experimental software to address SDA operational challenges.

  • Research into refactoring methods that enable rapid prototypes to evolve into maintainable, deployable systems without full-scale redevelopment.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

Government Validation & Technical Credibility
Being selected by the U.S. Space Force Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) signals strong technical credibility and alignment with Space Domain Awareness (SDA) mission priorities—significantly strengthening trust with primes, integrators, and future DoD customers.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation
CSO awards enable companies to advance high-risk, high-impact SDA software and analytics technologies using non-dilutive capital, preserving founder equity while increasing enterprise value and technical maturity.

Access to Space Force Operational Stakeholders
Awardees gain direct exposure to Space Force operators, technical leads, and acquisition personnel within the SDA enterprise—creating opportunities for transition paths, follow-on AOIs, and future operational adoption.

Increased Visibility & Notoriety
Participation in Space Force–funded R&D enhances visibility across the national security space ecosystem, including government stakeholders, defense primes, and the broader space technology community.

Strengthened Exit / Acquisition Potential
Demonstrating government-backed progress in SDA capabilities positions companies for strategic partnerships, follow-on contracts, or acquisition by major defense and space industry primes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Phase I submissions consist of a white paper and short PowerPoint briefing. For AOI-2025_01, white papers close January 20, 2026. Selected companies may be invited to pitch sessions and then submit a full proposal. Award notifications typically occur within ~45 days of evaluation, with contract start dates generally ~90 days after final proposal submission.

Where does this funding come from?

This funding is provided by the U.S. Space Force, administered through the Space Acquisition & Integration Office (SAIO) under DFARS 212.70 Commercial Solutions Opening authority.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is limited to U.S. entities. AOI-2025_01 is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS 541715. Offerors must comply with NIST SP 800-171 cybersecurity requirements and be eligible for federal contracting.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Winning teams are typically small businesses with strong technical depth in space data, analytics, modeling, or software R&D, and a clear understanding of SDA mission needs. Competitive proposals emphasize innovation, feasibility, and operational relevance, while remaining realistic in scope, schedule, and cost.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Phase I submissions must be unclassified. Foreign participation is prohibited due to export control and national security restrictions. The Government will acquire only minimum necessary data rights, allowing companies to retain ownership of their core IP.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Most teams should expect 4–6 weeks to prepare a compliant Phase I submission, including the quad chart, PowerPoint briefing, and white paper. Founders should plan additional time if cybersecurity documentation or internal technical alignment is needed.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

DLA Military Unique Sustainment Technology III (MUST-III) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

The Defense Logistics Agency’s MUST-III BAA provides up to $50M over five years for R&D that improves the military’s clothing and equipment manufacturing ecosystem. Companies may apply during the initial 45-day window (through Jan 16, 2026) for IDIQ consideration, or later through rolling White Paper submissions once the BAA reopens.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings, but it does specify:

• Total available program funding: up to $50M over 5 years.

• Awards are issued as cost-type contracts, which commonly support multi-hundred-thousand- to multi-million-dollar R&D projects.

• Each Short-Term Project (STP) is typically 3–24 months.

Historically, DLA ManTech STPs are substantial technical efforts—often sized to fully execute a discrete R&D solution (e.g., digital thread capability, manufacturing prototype, supply chain modeling tool).

What could I use the funding for?

Projects must align with one of the three Technical Areas of Interest:

• Digital as an authoritative source

  Establishing a single, trusted digital version of clothing and individual equipment specifications, manufacturing data, and sourcing details to reduce errors, increase speed, and enable automation throughout the supply chain.

  o This includes transitioning from traditional technical documents to digital data as the primary source of truth, ensuring all design, sourcing, and production information is timely, accurate consistent, accessible, and secure.

  o Emphasis should be placed on integrating model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and digital thread technologies. This transformation should rely on IT architectures that support interoperability, cybersecurity, and protection of intellectual property.

  o Advanced technologies such as augmented reality, AI, and machine learning could be utilized to bridge business and technical workflows, enhancing accuracy and operational efficiency.

  o Establishing secure, “time of need” information sharing capability e.g. Application Program Interfaces to enable distribution of technical data over the product lifecycle.

• Supply chain resilience in clothing and individual equipment

  Developing and demonstrating adaptive manufacturing capabilities and buffer strategies—like material stockpiles or alternate sourcing—that help the industry continue operating during surge requirements, large-scale conflicts, disasters, or disruptions.

  o Research in this area could focus on mapping supply chains, identifying critical bottlenecks, or developing models to simulate and respond to various disruptions. Tools like digital twin simulations of the supply chain and predictive analytics could be utilized to proactively address labor shortages, material delays, and capacity issues.

  o Researchers might also examine how to incorporate surge readiness, excess capacity strategies, and prepositioned material stockpiles to ensure stability in times of crisis.

  o Supplier categorization using digital platforms could support diversified sourcing and highlight alternative production pathways when traditional channels are compromised.

  o Develop capabilities to manufacture for low-volume or “made to measure” items, cost effectively with the very short lead-time needed to meet mission requirements (e.g. training goals).

• Innovation in clothing and individual equipment

  Encouraging research and development in novel materials, garment designs, and production methods (e.g. 3D knitting, advanced wearables, automated sewing) to enhance the performance, comfort, and scalability of military clothing and individual equipment.

  o Efforts should prioritize interfacing and coordinating with the Military Services on the development of cutting-edge textile technologies, next-generation uniform systems. This includes advanced manufacturing techniques. containerized and point-of-need manufacturing capabilities that allow rapid setup and deployment in remote or austere environments.

  o Research to encourage exploration into wearable technologies, self-healing fabrics, and automated production techniques such as 3D knitting and robotics. Digital representations of product lifecycles and materials performance, paired with a workforce trained in AI and digital tools, will ensure that new capabilities are both scalable and resilient.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, companies gain several strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection under DLA’s Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) program is a strong technical endorsement. This validation can accelerate partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors who trust government-vetted innovation.

Visibility & Industry Notoriety
Awardees participate in DLA working groups and may be highlighted in federal program materials—raising national profile within the defense textile and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

Access to DLA Experts & Ecosystem Collaboration
IDIQ awardees join a 5-year Working Group, providing direct collaboration with DLA program managers, CIE stakeholders, and other innovators—unlocking future contracting and transition opportunities.

Stronger Long-Term Valuation & Exit Potential
Advancing technology under nondilutive federal funding de-risks the product roadmap and strengthens valuation in future equity rounds or acquisition discussions—especially with defense, apparel manufacturing, or automation companies.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Initial Deadline:

• Full technical & cost proposals due January 16, 2026 (45 days after Dec 2, 2025 posting).

• These proposals are for IDIQ contract consideration.

After Initial Period:

• The BAA temporarily closes for evaluation.

• It then reopens for rolling White Paper submissions for the remainder of the 5-year period.

Award Timing:

• After evaluation, DLA notifies offerors of selection.

• Task orders (STPs) may or may not be immediately issued to IDIQ holders.

• Additional STPs may be awarded after White Papers → requested proposals → evaluation cycle.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) under the Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Program.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any responsible U.S. source capable of meeting government requirements, including:

• Large businesses

• Small businesses (including WOSB, HUBZone, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB)

• Nonprofits

• Universities / Minority Institutions

• HBCUs

There is no set-aside.
Must meet minimum standards in: financial resources, accounting system adequacy, technical capabilities, past performance, and compliance with FAR Part 9.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants typically include companies with:

• Expertise in digital engineering, textile manufacturing, AI/ML, automation, or supply chain analytics.

• Demonstrated DoD or CIE manufacturing experience (digital data, prototyping, supply chain modeling).

• Capabilities aligned tightly to Technical Areas of Interest.

• Strong past performance and ability to transition solutions into the production environment.

Examples of strong project types:

• Digital twin implementation for apparel manufacturing

• Secure digital technical data environment (authoritative source of truth)

• Surge production capability modeling

• Automated sewing or 3D knitting demonstrations

• Wearable sensor textiles

• AI-enabled supply chain forecasting for CIE items

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key requirements include:

• Cybersecurity compliance (DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171, CMMC).

• No compensation for proposing STPs (including White Papers).

• Subcontracting plans required for large businesses on proposals > $750,000.

• Projects must be executed within U.S. regulations for export controls, IP, and data rights.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a full proposal under this opportunity will likely take 150-200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

DARPA Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) Office-Wide BAA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) is offering funding for revolutionary research across microelectronics, photonic circuits, quantum systems, biological/organic circuits, advanced manufacturing ecosystems, and dual-use microsystems. Multiple awards are anticipated, with no predefined funding limits. Abstracts are accepted until January 15, 2026, and proposals until March 2, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding amount is flexible. DARPA anticipates multiple awards, and efforts may span basic research (6.1), applied research (6.2), or advanced technology development (6.3). Proposers can also elect an Accelerated Award Option for awards under $2 million with 30-day award timelines.

What could I use the funding for?

Research areas of current interest to MTO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

• Quantum circuits

  1. Interconnect technologies for transferring quantum states between qubit platforms

  2. Generalizable improvements for processing chain for all types of quantum sensors

  3. High density low loss mixed signal transfer between room and quantum temperatures

• Biological circuits

  1. High throughput molecular readers for full spectrum sequencing

  2. 3-dimensional bio-templated self-assembly of microsystems

  3. Highly-parallel DNA writing platforms for long DNA writes for genome-scale complexity with low error

• Photonic circuits

  1. Applications for purely photonic circuits not realizable in electronic circuits

  2. Chip scale photonics for ultralow noise microwave sources

  3. Tunable chip scale ultrafast (<10 ps) lasers

  4. Fiber-inspired ultralow loss integrated photonics

• Manufacturing Ecosystem

  1. Litho- and etch-free direct nanoscale semiconductor manufacturing

  2. Low-loss high permeability/permittivity materials

  3. High density cryogenic-to-room-temperature interconnects

  4. Atomically precise, multi-chemistry molecular manufacturing technologies

  5. Energy reclamation from low-grade waste heat

  6. Reconfigurable multiscale manufacturing for onshore manufacturing

• Dual Use by Design

  1. All-weather long distance high bandwidth communications

  2. Commercially relevant tool development challenge problems

  3. Conformal and malleable batteries

  4. Design and assembly of complex microsystems in supply-chain-free environments

  5. Reconfigurable additive manufacturing for multiple classes of materials

  6. Context aware imaging

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, awardees gain significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
DARPA selection signals elite technical quality and national-security relevance — often accelerating partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility
Awards frequently lead to increased visibility through DARPA communications, publications, and industry attention.

Ecosystem Access & Collaboration
Awardees join a national innovation community spanning quantum, photonics, microelectronics, and advanced materials — opening doors to long-term collaborations and follow-on opportunities.

Stronger Exit & Acquisition Potential
Non-dilutive support enables deep tech maturation without equity loss. Companies validated by DARPA historically see improved valuation, stronger commercial traction, and increased acquisition interest.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Abstract Deadline: January 15, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

Proposal Deadline: March 2, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

DARPA reviews proposals on a rolling basis.

If you select the Accelerated Award Option (<$2M projects), DARPA may issue an award within 30 days of selection notification.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Microsystems Technology Office (STO).

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Research must be revolutionary, not incremental.

• CMMC Level 2 is required for procurement contracts beginning Nov 10, 2025.

• Foreign influence and security review applies to fundamental research teams.

• Classified submissions require coordination with DARPA security.

• Export control and CUI restrictions apply.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Autonomous Interventions and Robotics (AIR) – ARPA-H-SOL-26-146

Below is a summary. Please see the official solicitation on sam.gov for details (link in Resources Section).

Executive Summary:

The AIR program will award multiple OT agreements to teams developing autonomous endovascular robotic systems and interventional microbots that can perform key parts of surgical and interventional procedures without direct human control. The program runs for five years (two-year Phase 1 and three-year Phase 2). Companies must submit a Solution Summary by January 26, 2026 and a Full Proposal by March 30, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

The ISO does not specify a minimum or maximum award amount. ARPA-H states only that it expects to make multiple OT awards under this opportunity; budgets will be driven by the scope, risk, and duration of each proposed 5-year effort (2-year Phase 1 + 3-year Phase 2).

What could I use the funding for?

The Autonomous Interventions and Robotics (AIR) program aims to catalyze the development of autonomous robotic surgery—an intervention during which a robot performs part, or all, of the procedure without direct human input. AIR encompasses two (2) technical areas: Technical Area 1 (TA1)—endovascular robotics, and Technical Area 2 (TA2)—microbots. Technical Area 1 comprises sub-areas TA1-A—endovascular robotic systems and TA1-B—endovascular simulation environment.

• Background

  During an endovascular procedure, the surgeon reviews the pre-operative CT of the patient’s vasculature, makes a small incision in the patient’s skin, then manually navigates guidewires and catheters from the femoral or radial artery up into the patient’s brain, using occasional guidance from intra-operative 2D fluoroscopy images. The surgeon steers the distal tip of the catheter around tortuous anatomy by pushing, pulling, and twisting the catheter at the entry point—a challenging process requiring dexterity, mental mapping, and an understanding of the physical properties of catheters. Often, the surgeon must try multiple types of catheters, restarting the navigation from the beginning and losing precious time in the process. Once the target is reached, additional challenges await. For example, during a mechanical thrombectomy—the removal of a stroke-inducing blood clot from the brain—once the catheter reaches the clot, there is ambiguity around contact and suction; with little tactile feedback beyond translated resistance, the surgeon needs to make a seal and suction the clot. In addition, endovascular surgeons receive high yearly doses of radiation during procedures, increasing their risk of cancer and other sequelae such as cataracts1.

  Thrombectomies are a critical unmet need in the United States and worldwide. Every year, approximately 335,000 Americans experience an ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion (LVO), a situation in which a major blood vessel in the brain is blocked by a clot. The standard of care is to mechanically remove the clot via thrombectomy; unfortunately, only ~40,000 Americans per year—about 10% of the patients with LVOs—receive thrombectomies2. There are only 311 thrombectomy-capable centers in the United States as of 20223, and they are unevenly distributed, with 50% of Americans living more than one hour away from one. Time to procedure is crucial; every 10-minute delay in revascularization lowers a patient’s disability-free lifetime by ~40 days and increases health care costs by $10,0004. While thrombectomies are currently recommended for patients within six hours from stroke onset, recent clinical studies have shown benefit to 24 hours and beyond5.

  More broadly, other specialized or highly invasive procedures are often the only way to obtain disease diagnostics and treat pathological conditions. These include biopsies of suspicious tissue, ablations of uterine fibroids, and destruction of kidney stones, among numerous others. Overall, surgery remains dangerous: more than one in three patients experience adverse events during surgical care. Furthermore, surgery requires specialist care, which can involve extensive travel and waiting times.

  Automated systems such as microbots (small, mechanical, electronic or hybrid devices) have the potential to dramatically increase access to interventions. However, surgical microrobot research and development is largely at an early stage and mostly devoted to biosensing and microrobot motion; the smaller the entity, the more difficult it is for the entity to propel itself directionally. Implementation of end-to-end clinical solutions is notional at best, except for pill-sized gastro-intestinal (GI) imaging devices, which are specifically excluded from accepted AIR solutions. Autonomous endovascular systems also currently do not exist; although complex robotics elements have been developed in industry and academia, autonomous navigation and control algorithms are still in their infancy.

• Program Goals

  AIR aims to make endovascular procedures available at hospitals everywhere through autonomous robotic systems; it is understood, though, that the transition from the current state of clinical care to this audacious goal is likely to involve multiple practical evolutionary steps. They will likely include: a) clinical trials during which endovascular surgeons present in the room will be ready to take over at any moment from the autonomous endovascular robotic system; b) a first deployment phase, in which local general surgeons and remote endovascular surgeons will oversee the procedure; and ultimately, c) a phase in which only local general surgeons (or other medical professionals) will oversee the operation of thoroughly validated autonomous systems.

  AIR microbots are intended to create a paradigm shift in interventional procedures, transforming these invasive procedures—currently performed in advanced care settings and requiring skilled practitioners—into minimally invasive procedures performed in a general practitioner’s office. Microbots are expected to simplify existing procedures, enable completely new procedures, reduce complications rates and costs, and increase procedure availability.

• Technical Area 1

  Technical Area 1 (TA1) of AIR aims to develop fully autonomous robotic endovascular intervention systems. After a medical professional inserts the catheter system into the femoral or radial artery, the robot will complete an endovascular procedure without human intervention. The system capabilities will be demonstrated in several procedures, including 3D rotational angiogram imaging, vascular embolization, and, most importantly, thrombectomy. Autonomous endovascular systems developed in TA1-A will encompass:

  1) Robotic control systems that can manipulate catheters and guidewires

  2) Navigation algorithms based on pre-operative imaging and real-time sensing

  3) Steerable catheters and guidewires (if required)

  4) Solutions for autonomous clot removal and vascular embolization

  In addition, TA1-B will develop an in silico testing and validation environment for these robots, an activity that will include the collection of fluoroscopic videos of endovascular procedures, CT angiograms, and other imaging modalities as needed for training.

  Note that autonomous blood vessel access is out of scope for the AIR program; a surgeon or surgical technician will obtain vessel access.
  
  Additional details are available in the solicitation.

• Technical Area 2

  Technical Area 2 (TA2) of AIR aims to develop a set of interventional microbots. Performers will specify a target clinical indication and develop microbots that move, sense, and act to diagnose or treat this condition by means of more precise targeting and/or less invasive access. TA2 teams will address:

  a. Microbot locomotion

  b. Anatomy/pathology targeting methods

  c. Miniaturization or externalization of power supplies and computational processing

  d. Autonomous or automated action

  e. Microbot removal or deactivation

  Gastrointestinal/ingestible pill microbots that only image, stimulate, and/or deliver cargo are out of scope for the AIR program.

  Although the technologies for both TAs are developed and validated for a target indication, it is expected that they will serve as platforms for multiple interventions and procedures.
  
  Additional details are available in the solicitation.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, AIR awards can provide strategic benefits typical of ARPA-style programs:

• Government technical validation: Being selected by ARPA-H signals that your approach is technically ambitious and nationally relevant in health innovation and surgical autonomy, which can help in discussions with strategics, hospital systems, and investors.

• Positioning for regulatory and ecosystem engagement: AIR is structured with parallel FDA collaboration (for TA1) and explicit regulatory milestones (e.g., simulation frameworks, Q-submissions) that can de-risk later clinical and commercialization steps.

• Access to a high-end performer network: Performers will interact with other top robotics, imaging, and microbotics teams, plus FDA scientific collaborators and ARPA-H program staff—often leading to follow-on partnerships and future solicitations.

• Nondilutive growth capital: Because funding is nondilutive, successful teams can mature high-capex platforms (robotics, microfabrication, imaging) while preserving equity and potentially driving higher valuations and stronger exit options down the line.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

1. Proposer’s Day: December 16, 2025

2. Q&A deadline: January 20, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

3. Solution Summaries due: January 26, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

4. Full Proposals due: March 30, 2026, 5:00 PM ET

Where does this funding come from?

The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a federal R&D agency within HHS, issuing awards under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 290c(g)(1)(D) via OT agreements.

Who is eligible to apply?

• Universities and other educational institutions

• Non-profit organizations

• Small businesses

• Other-than-small businesses

What companies and projects are likely to win?

1. Overall Scientific & Technical Merit:
   Companies proposing highly innovative, technically rigorous, and fully executable plans with well-defined milestones, clear risk-mitigation strategies, and IP structures that enable commercialization are most competitive. Winning projects will demonstrate a credible path to achieving AIR’s demanding 5-year technical milestones.

2. Proposer’s Capabilities & Related Experience:
   Teams with deep, directly relevant expertise—including experienced robotics engineers, imaging specialists, microbot developers, and required clinicians (e.g., an endovascular neurosurgeon for TA1-A)—are most likely to win. Prior success delivering complex R&D programs on time and on budget is a major advantage.

3. Assessment of Proposed Cost/Price:
   ARPA-H will favor proposers who submit realistic, well-justified budgets that reflect the true complexity of autonomous surgical robotics or microbot development. Costs must align with the technical plan, leverage past research efficiently, and avoid artificially low budgets or staffing junior personnel simply to reduce cost.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Key restrictions from the ISO include:

  • Scope restrictions

    • TA1 excludes autonomous vascular access and closure; a human must obtain vessel access.

    • GI “pill camera–only” devices and ingestible microbots that only image, stimulate, or deliver cargo are out of scope; GI microbots must at least sense and biopsy, or sense/biopsy/ablate, to qualify.

    • Purely biological, purely chemical, or chem-bio-only delivery concepts (no mechanical/electronic component) are not acceptable microbots. Nanoparticles alone are out of scope.

  • Team composition and application rules

    • TA1-A teams must include at least one endovascular neurosurgeon.

    • A given team may propose to either TA1-A or TA1-B, but not both

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions summary under this BAA will likely take 40–60 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Check the full solicitation here.

DIU Project Janus – Advanced Nuclear Microreactor Power Plant Prototyping

Executive Summary:

Project Janus is soliciting commercial solutions to design, prototype, and deploy advanced nuclear Microreactor Power Plants (MPPs) that can provide continuous, resilient power across Army installations. Awarded vendors will prototype both a First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and a Second-of-a-Kind (SOAK) MPP, leading to potential follow-on production and long-term power purchase agreements. Solution Briefs are due December 15, 2025, so companies should begin preparing ASAP.

How much funding would I receive?

DIU does not publish fixed award amounts, but nuclear prototyping OTAs typically fall within the multi-million to tens-of-millions range, depending on complexity and vendor contributions.

Importantly, DIU OTAs can lead directly to large follow-on production contracts or long-term electricity PPAs without further competition, enabling far greater lifetime contract value.

What could I use the funding for?

Problem Statement

Ensuring consistent, resilient energy across military installations and operational theaters has become an increasingly complex challenge for the U.S. military. Aging infrastructure, dependence on vulnerable civilian power grids, complex liquid fuel logistics, and rising energy demands from advanced technologies all threaten mission assurance. Frequent electricity outages, grid disruptions, and limited backup capacity jeopardize critical systems responsible for command, control, communications, and logistics. This directly undermines readiness, training, and operational effectiveness. These vulnerabilities underscore the urgent need for secure, scalable, and independent energy solutions that ensure continuous power for the warfighter to operate anytime, anywhere, regardless of external grid instability or supply chain disruptions.

The U.S. Army, alongside the Defense Innovation Unit, seeks to prototype Microreactor Power Plant(s) (MPPs) capable of developing a suite of advanced nuclear power plant energy solutions to meet the needs of the U.S. Department of War (DoW). These MPPs will leverage recent advances in the nuclear industry to provide continuous and reliable power in all DoW scenarios and will be demonstrated on a military installation within the United States by 2030.

Background

On 23 May 2025, four executive orders (EOs) were issued that aimed at modernizing America’s nuclear energy posture, with direct implications for the Army and the broader DoW. In particular, EO 14299 Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security, states that “it is the policy of the United States to ensure the rapid development, deployment, and use of advanced nuclear technologies to support national security objectives, such as the protection and operation of critical infrastructure, critical defense facilities, and other mission capability resources.” These orders represent a strategic shift towards immediately and impactfully leveraging advanced nuclear technologies. Meeting the objectives of EO14299 requires a focus on both installation and operational energy goals through a coordinated prototype program that leverages MPP technologies to address the Department of War’s energy needs. 

Project Approach

The broader Department of the Army’s Janus program objective is to develop a suite of prototype solutions for MPPs that can supply power for both installations and non-permanent operations. The Janus project approach under the DIU CSO will use an iterative prototype development process to provide a clear path to transition of the successful commercially demonstrated technology solutions. “Suite” refers to the DoW’s intent to select multiple reactor designs for the OTA Agreement, each to be paired with an Army installation by the Army after contract award. This will involve prototyping a First of a Kind (FOAK) MPP under the Army’s regulatory authority, followed shortly after by a Second of a Kind (SOAK) MPP, also using the Army’s regulatory authority. The Department is seeking fission-based solution sets for installation and defense purposes. 

Vendors will be paired with Army installations after the OTA contract award. Vendors will develop their FOAK prototype for demonstration on that installation and commence design of the SOAK prototype near the end of FOAK design. The SOAK prototype is expected to build on lessons learned from the FOAK and include design changes from the FOAK prototype, through iterative prototyping. 

Vendor solutions submitted under the AOI are highly encouraged to use the FOAK and SOAK approach in their proposals, and discuss the path from SOAK to Nth-of-a-kind production. Solutions may utilize the operating life of both the FOAK and SOAK MPPs in series to reach the 30-year lifetime power generation, assuming continuity of power across the 30-year period. 

The Army will be announcing the selection of the initial group of installations for the Janus project MPP prototypes at a later date. Vendors are prohibited from contacting or responding to queries from the installations regarding any aspect of CSO HQ084520SC001 or the Janus project. Vendors who do not comply with the prohibition may be removed from participation in the Janus Project. 

Project Objectives

The Department is seeking solution briefs for the full lifecycle of MPPs that would notionally start operations at an Army installation located in the United States before the end of calendar year 2030. Solution briefs should include all stages of an MPP’s lifecycle: design, testing, regulation, construction, operations, deconstruction, and returning the site to an unrestricted release status.

The objectives of the prototype include: 

• Provide mission assurance through energy resilience for a range of defense applications. 

• Assemble and operate prototype MPPs on military installations within the United States to demonstrate the capability of the MPP designs to provide safe, secure, reliable, and environmentally compliant electricity and thermal energy (if needed) in support of readiness goals for mission critical assets.

• Engage with the government and privatized distribution providers, transmission providers, and commodity providers currently serving U.S. Military installations to facilitate seamless and resilient energy regardless of commercial grid conditions.

Final solutions will follow a process under the U.S. Army Regulatory Authority for the entire lifecycle. The U.S. Army’s regulatory authority is derived from section 91b of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. § 2121(b)), as implemented pursuant to the Presidential Directive of 23 September 1961. Vendors will follow the Army regulatory process as documented in AR 50-7 (2016), although additional guidance will be provided during Phase 2 and throughout the FOAK design. AR 50-7 can be found at: https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r50-7_Web_FINAL.pdf. 

Awarded vendors will be given opportunities to provide feedback on gaps in Army regulatory processes as additional regulatory guidance is provided. Additional regulatory requirements, such as transportation of nuclear material on public highways, should be addressed by Vendors during their proposals.

Reviews and implementation during the MPP prototype development process will include an integrated and phased approach to compliance with planning and design, planning and construction, architecture and engineering, building construction, environmental, operating, safety and physical/cyber protection, emergency response planning, deconstruction, and spent fuel management requirements. 

A successful MPP prototype will provide a sound and demonstrated technological solution for commercial operations. A successful prototype will complete fuel load and testing phases and will be permitted by the Army Regulator to begin normal operations. The OTA prototype will transition to unrestricted operations as a COCO MPP with a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), production OTA, or other Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) based contract.

Desired Solution Features 

Desired solution features include the following attributes and capabilities: 

• Incorporates nuclear fuel that is enriched to 20% or less U-235 and that is legal for defense purposes. The fuel must be qualified, available, and fabricated on a timeline that will meet program timelines.  

  • Defense-purpose feedstock may be made available as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) for FOAK and SOAK MPPs through an Army fuel allocation process. If feedstock is provided as GFE, vendors will be responsible for transportation, blending, and fabrication of the fuel. 

  • Vendors should address the implications of a) the Government not providing feedstock as GFE, b) of the Government providing feedstock as GFE for only the first fueling, and c) the Government providing feedstock as GFE for the operational life of the MPP.

• Capable of producing electrical power in the range of kW-level up to 20MWe (up to 60 MWth). Capable of local control and dispatch and integrated to the greatest extent practicable into existing infrastructure, operations centers (if applicable), workflows, and operations and maintenance systems. 

• Capable of startup/shutdown and monitoring operations both with and without commercial power availability (both black start and grid-connected start capability). 

• Capable of MPP operations with a commercial power connection, and an alternative credited independent power source as a backup. 

• The MPP should be operated only from the control room located within the Army installation (remote or wireless operation is not allowed). 

  • MPPs with remote maintenance and diagnostics capabilities that comply with relevant cybersecurity U.S. Government standards, e.g., NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 for Federal Contractors, may be considered. 

  • The MPP control room must be designed to accommodate two operators, with space for an additional person, at a minimum. 

• The MPP design should include passive safety features to the extent practical to ensure MPP key safety functions are satisfied under all conditions, states, and modes. 

• Radiation exposure at the MPP site boundary should not exceed the limits provided in 10 CFR 20 during routine operations. Proposals must sufficiently account for relevant factors, including sky shine, emissions from activated site materials, and surrounding buildings at various elevations around the site boundary. 

• The MPP design must address Natural Hazard Phenomena, including seismic loads, external floods, and other potential hazards.

• The MPP design must have clearly articulated systems and safety case approaches, including an initial set of proposed design criteria and design safety strategy.

• Vendor strategy and capability to continuously provide full power supply for up to 30 years, including operations, maintenance, sustainment, and refueling activities. 

  • There are no restrictions on the proposed strategy to achieve 30-years of continuous power (e.g., refueling or ‘replaceable’ modules to maintain continuity of operations). 

  • The overall lifecycle strategy of the MPP by the Vendor will be evaluated and must include associated costs/risks with the proposed strategy for long-term operations.

• Non-core irradiated material should be removed or qualified for unrestricted release within 2 years upon completion or termination of the power production contract. An initial irradiated material disposal plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before design permitting. 

• Irradiated core material should be removed from the site notionally within 5 years of completion or termination of the power production contract, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Army. An initial core decommissioning plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before MPP operations are permitted. 

• A target site area should be sized appropriately for FOAK (and SOAK if co-located) to ensure compliance with Federal radiation limits in 10 CFR 20 and the anticipated Seismic Design Category. Selected Vendors will be paired with an installation post-OTA award.

• Reasonable and appropriate safety, physical, cyber, and safeguards measures should be implemented in the design consistent with best practices. Army-specific requirements will be provided to vendors invited to participate in Phase 2 Pitches. 

• In addition to the above desired solution features, solutions must address the aspects below: 

  • A nuclear supply chain for nuclear-grade equipment that is clearly identified and credibly available to supply equipment to meet the notional timeline. The nuclear supply chain identified must meet defense-purpose limitations; any part of the nuclear supply chain reliant on international sources must be identified and mitigated with a plan approved by the Army.

  • Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) for equipment included in the design. The TRL and MRL readiness levels will be evaluated in depth during Phase 2 Pitches. 

  • Identified gaps in available Computational analytical tools, Codes, or Standards accepted for nuclear use. Identified analytical tools, Codes, or Standards for which the design will operate outside the approved range 

  • (e.g., the MPP operates at a higher temperature than existing foundational data).

  • Identified gaps in available material performance data for safety or reliability-related equipment under anticipated operating conditions.

  • Plans and approaches to move from FOAK to SOAK, to Nth-of-a-Kind development and production. Plans to commercialize or develop commercial versions of proposed MPP prototype designs.

  • Long-term plans for fuel acquisition and manufacturing, including the status of negotiations or agreements with miners, enrichers and/or fabricators. 

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct prototype funding, awardees gain substantial strategic advantages:

Government Validation & National Credibility
Winning a DIU/Army nuclear award signals unmatched credibility in defense nuclear innovation. This accelerates alignment with primes, utilities, and capital markets.

Path to Long-Term, Non-Dilutive Revenue
Successful prototypes can transition into 30-year Power Purchase Agreements, production OTAs, or FAR contracts, representing massive long-term revenue potential.

Increased Market Visibility
Awardees gain visibility across DoD, DOE, and national energy/security communities—often resulting in media coverage and faster customer traction.

Supply Chain & Regulatory Acceleration
Participation provides exposure to Army regulators, national labs, nuclear fuel providers, and defense-focused supply chain partners—accelerating commercialization beyond the defense market.

Higher Exit and Valuation Potential
Nondilutive support for FOAK/SOAK nuclear builds significantly increases company valuation, technical defensibility, and acquisition potential for defense, energy, and infrastructure buyers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Solution Brief Due: December 15, 2025

• DIU Review: ~30 days for down-select

• Phase 2 Pitch: Invitation-only, early 2026

• Full Proposal (Phase 3): Following successful pitch

• Prototype Awards: Rolling upon approval and funding availability

• FOAK Operation Goal: Before end of 2030

• SOAK Development: Begins near completion of FOAK design

Where does this funding come from?

Project Janus is funded through the U.S. Army and executed under the Defense Innovation Unit's Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process. Awards are made using Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022 (formerly § 2371b).

Who is eligible to apply?

U.S. and foreign-owned commercial companies

• Companies proposing fission-based microreactor designs

• Teams including reactor designers, fabricators, integrators, fuel cycle partners

• Vendors able to provide private financial contributions (projects relying solely on government funds are not eligible)

• Vendors able to comply with Section 889 and Army nuclear regulatory requirements

Multiple submissions and teaming arrangements are allowed.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants will:

• Demonstrate credible, deployable microreactor designs at TRL/MRL levels suitable for FOAK prototyping

• Present a robust plan for 30 years of operations, including refueling or replaceable module strategies

• Show credible nuclear supply chain access for fuel, components, and safety-critical systems

• Provide a realistic path from FOAK → SOAK → Nth-of-a-kind commercialization

• Demonstrate ability to meet Army regulatory requirements under AR 50-7

• Provide private cost share or financial contributions, as required in Phase 2

• Address cybersecurity, safety, passive safety features, and natural hazard requirements

• Show strong corporate viability and commercial market strategy (a key DIU evaluation factor)

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Remote or wireless operation of the MPP is not allowed; control room must be on-installation

• Vendors may not contact Army installations

• All proposals must be unclassified; CUI is not allowed

• Foreign-owned firms must be able to secure necessary clearances

• Vendors must address implications of fuel as GFE vs. vendor-supplied

• Submissions must comply with Army radiation exposure limits and 10 CFR 20

• Private financing participation is required to advance to Phase 2 and Phase 3

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions brief will take 50-75 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Solution Brief for $5000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.

DARPA Strategic Technology Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Strategic Technology Office (STO) BAA is soliciting breakthrough research concepts that create new mission-level capabilities beyond the current state of practice. The agency will fund a limited number of high-risk, high-reward proposals across a broad range of defense and national-security technical domains. Applications are due December 19, 2025.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA does not publish fixed award amounts for this BAA. STO funds a limited number of proposals, and budgets are determined by the technical approach, the scope of work, and alignment with STO priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

DARPA's STO seeks innovative ideas and disruptive technologies that provide the U.S. military and national security leaders with trusted, disruptive capabilities across all physical domains (Air, Space, Sea, and Land) and across the spectrum of competition. STO programs deliver solutions at speed and scale for today's warfighters while developing the resilient "breakthrough" systems and technologies needed for future battlespaces. STO does not focus on one area of responsibility or phenomenology. Rather, STO programs capture the strategic, logistical, and tactical complexity of today's national security environments. STO is a "systems office" seeking to create new "proof-of-concept" mission systems. Its goals are to develop and demonstrate new capabilities that expand what is technically possible.

Research areas of current interest to STO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

•  Acoustic communication and sensing

•  Adaptability

•  Advanced computing

•  Additive manufacturing

•  Architecture and advanced systems engineering

•  Artificial intelligence

•  Autonomy and control algorithms

•  "Big data" analytics

•  Combat identification

•  Command and control (C2)

•  Communications and networking, virtual and adaptive

•  Complexity management

•  Critical infrastructure defense

•  Decision aids and C2 technology

•  DevOps and novel software development and integration

•  Directed energy (DE)

•  Distributed autonomy and teaming (machine-machine, human-machine)

•  Economic security

•  Effects chain functions (disaggregated find, fix, finish, target, engage, assess)

•  Electro-optic/infrared sensors

•  Electromagnetic warfare (EW)

•  High-frequency (HF) communications and sensing

•  High voltage electric power systems and architecture

•  Human behavior modeling

•  Human-machine symbiosis

•  Industrial engineering

•  Integration and reliability technologies

•  Interoperability

•  Logistics

•  Modeling and simulation

•  Microwave and millimeter wave communications and sensing

•  Novel kinetic effects

•  Non-kinetic effects (EW, DE, cyber)

•  Optical technologies

•  Photonics

•  Radio technologies (especially software-defined and novel waveforms and processing)

•  Radar and adaptive arrays

•  Resilient systems

•  Robotics

•  Seekers and other expendable sensors and processing

•  Sensors and analytics

•  Signal processing

•  Space sensors, communications, autonomy, and architectures (especially supporting proliferated low earth orbit constellations)

•  Strategy analysis technology

•  Supply chain analytics

•  System of systems

•  Undersea and seabed technology

•  Tactics development technology

•  Testing and data collection

•  Very low earth orbit (VLEO) technology

•  Very low frequency (VLF) technology

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, DARPA funding offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Receiving a DARPA award signals exceptional scientific and engineering merit, which accelerates engagement with primes, integrators, strategic partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
DARPA programs are frequently highlighted in federal communications, technical conferences, and defense media—boosting your company’s profile across the national security sector.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain access to DARPA program managers, government labs, test ranges, and a high-level innovation network—opening doors to future contracts and partnerships.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive funding that matures breakthrough technology, combined with the DARPA “stamp,” often increases valuation and attractiveness to large defense, aerospace, semiconductor, and AI-focused acquirers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Applications are due December 19, 2025.

DARPA does not publish a fixed award timeline.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Strategic Technology Office (STO), a DoD organization responsible for advanced mission-level systems and emerging technologies.

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposals must not duplicate existing STO programs or other active STO BAAs.

• Research that yields incremental or “evolutionary” improvements is specifically excluded.

• Offerors are strongly encouraged to review current STO programs and speak with program managers before applying.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 Project + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) – Mines & Metals Capacity Expansion – Piloting Byproduct Critical Minerals and Materials Recovery at Domestic Industrial Facilities (DE-FOA-0003583)

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, through NETL, is offering up to $275 million under DE-FOA-0003583 to fund large pilot facilities that recover byproduct critical materials from coal-based and other industrial feedstocks, mine waste, and process wastes. Projects will design, construct, and operate 1:50-scale or larger pilots that produce market-ready critical material products and generate the data needed for near-term commercial facilities in the United States. Applications are due December 15, 2025, at 5:00 pm EST.

How much funding would I receive?

For this NOFO, funding is structured by topic area:

• Topic Area 1 – Mines & Metals Pilots – Coal-Based Industry

  • Total funding: up to $75 million.

  • Approximate number of awards: 0–3.

  • Approximate award size: $10 million–$50 million per project.

  • Minimum cost share: 20% of total project costs.

  • Approximate project period: 48 months.

• Topic Area 2 – Mines & Metals Pilots – All Industries

  • Total funding: up to $200 million.

  • Approximate number of awards: 0–10.

  • Approximate award size: $10 million–$75 million per project.

  • Minimum cost share: 20% of total project costs.

  • Approximate project period: up to 48 months.

Actual award sizes and number of awards will depend on appropriations, application quality, and DOE priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

Program Goals and Objectives:

This NOFO invests in American industrial facilities that have the potential to produce valuable critical materials from existing industrial processes and legacy waste streams. Industries such as mining and mineral processing, power generation, coal, oil and gas, specialty metals, and basic materials have the potential to recover valuable materials that will address many of America’s most severe mineral vulnerabilities. The goal of this NOFO is to increase domestic critical material production.

American industrial facilities have enormous potential to recover valuable mineral coproducts and byproducts from ongoing operations and legacy waste streams such as mine tailings, impoundments, and coal ash. To de-risk industry investments, the technology for recovering these materials must be piloted under real-world conditions and at a scale relevant to each industry.

This NOFO will support the design, construction, and operation of large (1:50 scale or larger), ‘right-sized’ pilot processing systems at domestic industrial facilities. Successful pilots may produce a wide variety of critical material products, including oxides, salts, metals, alloys, and non-critical material value-added products.

DOE envisions that the large pilots will generate critical information resulting in near-term commercial project viability. Successful pilots will reduce technical uncertainty and financial risk prior to commercial deployment. Should funding and DOE goals align, NOFO award recipients may be considered eligible for possible follow-on scale-up funding opportunities, should DOE pursue such ventures.

Expected Performance Goals:

Performers will design, construct, and operate large pilot facilities (1:50 scale or larger) to produce critical materials necessary for our energy, defense, and economic security and to de-risk commercial scale production technologies to grow new economic and manufacturing opportunities.

Projects will produce qualified market-ready critical material products and other value-added materials with potential offtake agreements. Projects will show they are on track to meet their pilot objectives by producing defined quantities of critical materials at the proposed scales in each phase, subject to evaluation through go/no-go milestones. In addition, projects will generate the critically needed information and operational data required for the development of a near-term commercial facility within the U.S.

Two topic areas are defined based on eligible feedstock and the technology readiness level (TRL). See the attached Technology Readiness Level Reference for TRL definitions.

• Topic Area 1: Mines & Metals Pilots—Coal-Based Industry

  Small pilot-scale facilities (TRL 5) that have demonstrated the capabilities of producing REE and other critical materials from coal-based resources shall be scaled for design, construction, and operation as large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale facilities (TRL 7) for the production of market-ready REE and other critical materials, and for generation of critically essential design information and operational data necessary for near-term, future operation of a commercial processing facility (TRL 8) by no later than 2030.

  Topic Area 1 requires the use of coal and coal byproducts as feedstocks with minor or limited emphasis on the use of other (non-coal) industrial-based mining materials. Domestic coal-based feedstock materials (e.g., lignite, refuse tailings, etc.) and/or industrial coal-based wastes (e.g., prep plant wastes, power generation fly/bottom ash, coal-based AMD, etc.) shall be utilized. REE recovery is the required focus of Topic Area 1, preferably with co-recovery of other critical materials and other value-added materials; Critical materials recovery without REE recovery and other value-added material production without REE recovery are not of interest.

• Topic Area 2: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries

  This topic area broadly supports piloting the recovery of valuable critical material byproducts and other value-added products from industrial feedstocks, processes, and process wastes including mine waste. Example projects in Topic Area 2 could include critical material recovery from bauxite residue processing, valorization of zinc processing byproducts (e.g., indium from zinc smelting), and valorization of numerous critical materials from ongoing processing of titanium, phosphorous, lead, oil & gas or other industry wastes or production processes. Impounded or stockpiled waste materials are in scope. Modular, mobile, or fixed sites are in scope.

  In Topic Area 2, the applicant will establish large, pilot-scale facilities for production of valuable critical material byproducts from industry operations and/or wastes at the specific TRL ranges described in the subtopics below. These facilities will generate data and information needed for validation of future, near-term domestic commercial production of market-ready critical materials.

  Topic Area 2 requires the use of feedstocks from industrial feedstocks, processes, or process wastes including mine waste. For example, this may include (1) residual material from processing; (2) process streams, process byproducts, secondary materials, and/or waste materials that are produced by industry’s production; or (3) conventional ore (including monazite, bastnaesite, and/or other domestically mined materials) processing waste or waste materials such as residues, slimes, or below-cutoff grade ore or other mined material.

  Feedstocks for Topic Area 2 can come from all industry sources other than coal-based industry and feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling.

  Subtopic 2a: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries—Prior Bench-Scale Facilities

  Subtopic 2a is focused on industrial processes for critical materials recovery that have been developed at a bench-scale TRL of 4 or 5. The objective of Subtopic 2a is to accelerate technology development that leverages industry’s existing bench-scale (TRL 4) or small pilot-scale (TRL 5) process design concepts and scales those processes or systems for design, construction, and operation of a large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale facility (TRL 7).

  Subtopic 2b: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries—Prior Pilot-Scale Facilities

  Subtopic 2b is focused on industrial processes for critical materials recovery that have been developed at a pilot-scale TRL of 6 or 7 (7 preferred). The objective of Subtopic 2b is to accelerate technology development that leverages industry’s existing pilot-scale facility (TRL 6 or 7, 7 preferred) process design concepts and scales those processes or systems for design, construction, and operation of a large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale mineral production facility (TRL 7 or 8, 8 preferred).aterial byproducts and other value-added products from industrial feedstocks, processes, and process wastes including mine waste. Feedstocks for Topic Area 2 can come from all industry sources other than coal-based industry and feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling.

  Previously developed bench-scale efforts identified for Subtopic 2a are expected to advance the TRL of their process/system from 4 or 5 to 7. Previously developed pilot-scale efforts identified for Subtopic 2b are expected to advance the TRL of their process/system from 6 or 7 to 7 or 8.

  Applications to Topic Area 2 can recover any critical material.

• Information and Requirements for both Topic Areas

  The following information applies to all Topic Areas and Subtopics.

  The overall objective is to design, construct, and operate large pilot critical material production facilities (1:50 scale or larger) in the U.S. that will produce critical material byproducts from industrial processes. These pilots will deliver critical data needed for near-term commercial scale-up by using real-world industrial feedstocks and materials for verification and validation of the commercial potential of their processes/system, including, but not limited to:

  • data on the performance of individual processing circuits/systems and their overall integration,

  • process models,

  • capital and operating costs,

  • scaling factors, and

  • feedstock and end-product characterization
  
  Critical Material Byproduct Targets at Domestic Industrial Sites

  Applications must focus on the development of fully operational processing systems, located at and integrated with a domestic industrial site, that will be operated in a continuous/semi-continuous manner to produce market-ready critical materials. DOE Critical Materials include all minerals on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) List of Critical Minerals plus additional materials for energy. It is within scope to produce any market-ready critical material including critical material concentrates, high purity materials, or material commodities such as mixed oxides, salts, alloys, etc.

  Applicants are encouraged to consider production of materials that support both energy security and national defense needs. Applicants are also encouraged to reference the DOE Critical Materials List12 and USGS 2025 Mineral Commodity Summaries Report.13 Of particular interest are the production of critical materials with low or zero current domestic production. Critical materials with limited domestic production include arsenic, antimony, bismuth, chromium, fluorine, gallium, germanium, graphite, indium, manganese, magnesium, niobium, scandium, tantalum, tin, tungsten, rare earth elements, and yttrium.

  Large Pilot-Scale Facility Size and Operational Information

  The large (1:50 scale or larger) pilot-scale systems of interest in this NOFO should be ‘right-sized’ to demonstrate production of critical materials in quantity and purity specifications to support and establish the basis for near-term commercial production of saleable critical materials. The ’right-sized’, large pilot must have a critical material production capacity target of at least 2% (1:50 scale) of a commercial-scale system. For example, if the targeted critical material production of a large pilot-scale facility is 25 metric tons per year (tpy), and it is identified that commercial-scale systems for that targeted material generally produce 300 tpy, then the large pilot-scale facility would produce 25/300 = 8.3% of a commercial-scale system.
  
  Feedstock and Byproduct Critical Material Target

  The intent is to pilot potential byproduct material valorization at industrial sites including ongoing industrial production streams and waste impounded at active sites or sites of former industrial activity. The use of domestic feedstocks is preferred. Any feedstock located within the U.S. is considered domestic regardless of its original source. For example, mine waste at a U.S. facility that was originally mined from foreign territory is considered a domestic feedstock. No federal funding can be used to procure foreign feedstock.

  Applications proposing feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling are specifically not of interest.

  Applicants must identify the feedstock and quantify the feedstock throughput and critical material production, in terms of metric tons per year, that:

  • has been successfully demonstrated in their existing bench-scale or pilot-scale system on actual (non-simulated) feedstocks,

  • is targeted for their proposed large pilot-scale facility,

  • is generally targeted in ideal commercial-scale systems, and

  • is targeted for future commercial-scale operation at the site.

  Applicants must state the purity specification of the commercial market-ready critical materials to be produced. The large pilot projects must aim to meet specific quantity and purity standards for the critical material(s) produced or explain why that is not technically, operationally, or economically feasible or appropriate for this project.

  In addition, applicants must describe the overall impact of the large pilot-scale system, as well as a potential future commercial-scale system, on the foreign import reliance for each critical material produced. For example, the large pilot-scale system may reduce import reliance of a specific critical material from 90% to possibly 85% and a future commercial-scale system may further reduce the import reliance to possibly 50%.

  Projects must utilize feedstock materials that are sufficiently abundant to support the awarded project and maintain future pilot operational capacity for a minimum of five years. Applicants must provide evidence of material availability in the quantity needed to fulfill this 5-year requirement. A letter of support should be included in the application from all companies, agencies, or other parties that have ownership/rights to any proposed feedstock materials to allow large pilot-scale facility operation for the performance of the award (e.g., if utilizing coal ash, please provide a letter of support from the power or coal company who is producing the ash). If no letters of support can be obtained, applicants must provide an explanation in the Technical Volume as to why they are not necessary, or how the necessary feedstock is intended to be obtained.

  Large pilot-scale facilities are encouraged to exhibit feedstock flexibility, enabling them to process multiple feedstock types (e.g., bauxite red mud, kaolinite clay, and/or phosphate wastes) within the same facility, though not necessarily concurrently. Strategies that bolster pilot facility resilience by processing diverse feedstocks or offering modularity or mobility are particularly encouraged. Pilot production of multiple critical materials is also encouraged.

  Facility Technical Feasibility and Prior Work

  Applicants are required to:

  • Provide information that demonstrates the technical feasibility of their existing technology for processing the proposed feedstock to produce the critical material(s) of interest at their application’s starting TRL. Actual (non-simulated) feedstock materials must have been used with processes operated in a continuous/semi-continuous manner.

  • Submit photographs of existing systems to demonstrate existing process scale and capabilities.

  • Provide an estimate of the time to acquire any required site permits and time for construction. These estimates will be revised with actual timelines during project execution.

  Applicants should include information relevant to costing, such as Feasibility Studies (pre-Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) based on an AACE Class 4 Cost Estimate25) in the Application Package. Each large-scale pilot is required to be designed, constructed, and operated in a manner to generate relevant new information to aid future development of a commercial system (TRL 8, FEED Study based on an AACE Class 3 Cost Estimate). Development of a FEED Study for the future commercial system is not within scope of this NOFO.

  Where separation, extraction, and recovery processes have been developed by industry, process flowsheets (to the extent that non-proprietary information can be made available) and critical material recovery performance should be described.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, this NOFO offers several strategic advantages for companies advancing large pilot-scale critical mineral recovery technologies:

Market Readiness and Investor Confidence
DOE-supported pilot facilities are positioned as a critical bridge to commercialization. Successfully operating a DOE-funded pilot—using real industrial feedstocks at meaningful scale—signals to customers, strategic partners, and investors that your technology is technically validated, financially de-risked, and ready for larger commercial deployment.

Risk Reduction and Safer Scale-Up
The program is structured to help teams identify technical, operational, and integration risks before committing to full-scale capital build-out. Generating continuous or semi-continuous operational data under DOE oversight gives companies greater certainty around project feasibility, cost structure, and long-term performance.

National-Level Visibility and Ecosystem Access
Participation in a DOE-funded pilot often increases visibility within federal agencies, national labs, and the broader critical minerals sector. Awardees are well-positioned for future federal contracting, R&D collaboration, and follow-on scale-up opportunities—subject to DOE priorities and merit review.

Technology Validation that Strengthens Supply Chain Positioning
Producing tonnage-level critical material outputs under DOE-supported conditions enhances credibility with downstream processors and manufacturers. This validation helps companies form off-take relationships, strategic partnerships, and potential commercial agreements.

Workforce, Skills, and Operational Capabilities
Standing up a pilot facility develops advanced operational expertise within your organization—expertise that becomes a competitive advantage when transitioning to full commercial-scale deployment and building long-term U.S.-based critical materials infrastructure.

Collectively, these benefits reinforce domestic supply chain resilience and strengthen a company’s strategic position in the emerging U.S. critical minerals and materials ecosystem.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Application Deadline: December 15, 2025, 5:00 pm EST

• Anticipated Selection Notification Date: January 16, 2026

• Anticipated Conditional Award Date: January 23, 2026

• Anticipated Award Date: June 15, 2026

• Estimated Period of Performance: June 15, 2026 – June 14, 2030 (up to ~48 months)

Where does this funding come from?

Funding for DE-FOA-0003583 comes from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), specifically Section 41003(b)-(c), and uses FY 2024–2026 funds. The NOFO is issued by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), and administered by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL).

Who is eligible to apply?

The NOFO is open primarily to domestic entities as recipients or subrecipients, including:

• Institutions of higher education

• For-profit organizations

• Nonprofit organizations

• State and local governmental entities

• Indian Tribes (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 5304)

To qualify as a domestic entity, an organization must:

• Be organized, chartered, incorporated, or otherwise formed under the laws of a U.S. state or territory.

• Have its principal place of business in the United States.

• Have majority U.S. ownership and control.

• Have a physical place of business in the United States.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals will be scored according to the following criteria:

Scientific and Technical Merit (50%) – Projects that demonstrate strong scientific grounding, a clear understanding of critical materials recovery, a credible pilot concept, and a realistic commercialization pathway. Competitive proposals show how the pilot is “right-sized” for near-term scale-up and may leverage multiple feedstocks or produce multiple critical material products.

Technical Approach (30%) – Proposals with a well-structured SOPO and Project Management Plan, the ability to begin operations quickly, and a clear path to steady-state critical material production. High-scoring projects show meaningful tonnage potential, robust risk mitigation, and a logical workplan tied to impactful commercial outcomes.

Team Capabilities (20%) – Applicants with strong financial stability, the ability to meet the 20% cost share, and demonstrated experience operating pilot facilities or complex processing systems. Competitive teams typically include industry partners, off-take relationships, established roles, and adequate facilities and equipment.

Additional Selection Factors – Projects that diversify feedstocks or regions, contribute meaningfully to the DOE critical materials portfolio, create high-quality U.S. jobs, align with Buy America preferences, and show a credible path to a future commercial facility are more likely to be selected.

Projects that can stand up large, U.S.-based pilot operations and demonstrate a high-confidence pathway to commercial deployment will be the strongest contenders.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

DOE anticipates awarding cooperative agreements under this NOFO, which include a statement of DOE’s “substantial involvement” in the work performed under the resulting awards. For cooperative agreements, DOE does not limit its involvement to the administrative requirements of the award. Instead, DOE has substantial involvement in the direction and redirection of the technical aspects of the project. DOE’s substantial involvement in resulting awards may include the following:

A. DOE shares responsibility with the recipient for the management, control, direction, and performance of the project.

B. DOE may intervene in the conduct or performance of work under this award for programmatic reasons. Intervention includes the interruption or modification of the conduct or performance of project activities.

C. DOE may redirect or discontinue funding the project based on the outcome of DOE’s evaluation of the project at the Go/No-Go decision point(s).

D. DOE participates in major project decision-making processes.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission will likely take 160–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Flat Fee + Success Fee rate can be quoted depending on the size of the project.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

• See the solicitation here.

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) – Mine of the Future – Proving Ground Initiative (DE-FOA-0003390)

Executive Summary:

DOE’s Mine of the Future – Proving Ground Initiative (DE-FOA-0003390) will provide approximately $5 million to $40 million per cooperative agreement (about $80 million total, up to four awards) to establish field-scale mining technology proving grounds and run initial mine technology projects focused on critical minerals and materials. The Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) was issued November 14, 2025, and complete applications are due December 15, 2025. DOE anticipates making conditional selections in January 2026, with awards expected to start around June 15, 2026, for an estimated 4-year project period.

How much funding would I receive?

DOE anticipates:

• Approximate total available funding: $80,000,000 (FY26).

• Approximate number of awards: up to four.

• Approximate dollar amount of individual awards: $5,000,000 to $40,000,000.

Awards will be structured as cooperative agreements with an approximate 48-month project period, organized into three budget periods (two for proving ground development and one for initial project execution).

The cost share must be at least 20% of the total project costs for research and development.

What could I use the funding for?

Summary:

The Department of Energy (DOE), through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), intends to support the establishment of Mining Technology Proving Grounds that will act as specialized mining technology testing and research facilities. The primary objective of this funding opportunity is to develop and operate field-scale proving grounds that serve as testbeds for validating and de-risking emerging mining technologies. Additionally, these proving grounds are expected to provide the necessary infrastructure, operating environment, and technical capabilities to enable the advancement of innovative technologies from laboratory and/or bench-scale development to integrated field-scale demonstration.

DOE’s vision includes encouraging robust and lasting industry and academic partnerships (e.g., consortia, joint industry partnerships), thereby creating a vital pipeline for innovative technologies and a skilled workforce in mining that will serve as a foundation for domestic mining innovation for many years to come. In addition, applicants must also propose a minimum of one (1) and no more than two (2) mining technology development projects to be conducted at the proving ground. These envisioned mining technology development projects must demonstrate clear progression from laboratory and/or bench-scale validation to field-scale testing at the proving ground site by progressing the proposed technology by at least one TRL from the project(s) beginning. Initial mine technology projects can start anywhere from TRL 2 to TRL 6. Due to the accelerated schedule for this NOFO, if selected, the applicant may be asked to amend the initial projects further during the negotiation and/or definitization process. In summary, FE is requiring applications to include two distinct elements 1) establishment of proving ground and 2) mine technology project(s) that would utilize and demonstrate efficacy of the proving ground.

The proving grounds funded under this announcement will serve as critical platforms to reduce the technical and economic risks associated with novel mining technologies to be utilized by government agencies, industrial partners, and academic institutions. By advancing promising technologies through field-scale validation, the program will accelerate pathways to commercialization, thereby supporting secure, sustainable, and responsible U.S. mining operations.

The DOE aims for a diverse portfolio of proving ground facilities to demonstrate a broad range of mining technologies across various mineral types, geologic settings, and operational scales. The varied estimated award amounts for individual awards reflect DOE's desire to support diverse facility designs, allowing for proving grounds of varying scales, complexities, and capabilities, leveraging existing infrastructure, and enabling targeted technology demonstration across mining process stages.

Program Goals and Objectives:

This NOFO seeks applications to address the establishment of Mining Technology Proving Grounds and accelerate the development of innovative technologies for the U.S. mining sector. This initiative aims to re-establish U.S. leadership in mining by fostering real-world testing, optimization, and deployment of next generation mining technologies, addressing a critical need for secure and resilient domestic Critical Mineral (CM) supply networks.

The primary goal is to establish a field-scale mine proving ground in Budget Period (BP) 1 and BP 2. This facility will host one or two initial R&D envisioned projects in BP 3, focusing on technologies that have progressed beyond laboratory/bench-scale. The objective is to de-risk new mining technologies for commercialization and industry adoption. For purposes of this NOFO, Proving Ground and Facility are used interchangeably and indicate the site in which the envisioned project will be carried out. Additionally, initial mine technology projects can be used interchangeably with Projects, Envisioned Projects, and mine technologies and describe the projects carried out in the Facility in BP 3. Furthermore, for the purposes of this NOFO, Critical Minerals (CM) and Critical Minerals and Materials (CMM) are used interchangeably.

DOE envisions that, once established, these proving ground facilities will represent national assets that can accelerate technology innovation by serving as collaborative platforms for future DOE funded projects and as shared resources for industry, academia, and other partners, aligned with DOE mission priorities and subject to the availability of funding.

See more information below:

• Strategic Aims

  This program seeks to re-establish U.S. leadership in the mining sector by supporting R&D in both conventional and unconventional methods and resources. Technology areas include: ore body/resource exploration, appraisal, mining, processing, automation, energy management, and waste management. The proving grounds will facilitate field-scale testing and maturation of innovative technologies for responsible critical mineral mining, streamlining processes, and reducing risks and costs.

  This competitive funding opportunity will support awards for infrastructure development and technologies that transform mining practices. The proving grounds should be designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of Mine Technology projects and will facilitate the maturation of advanced mining technologies. The Mine Technology projects can range from laboratory and/or bench-scale (TRL 2) to field-scale (TRL 6) and must be able to transition at least one TRL from the project’s start. The proving ground will aid in overcoming the "valley of death" where promising technologies often stall due to a lack of suitable testing environments. These sites will also serve as vital training grounds for a new generation of skilled American miners.

• Core Objectives of Proving Grounds

  The proving ground facilities are designed to accelerate the entire exploration-to-production timeline, realizing the "Mine of the Future" vision by de-risking mining technology, developing new methods to reduce waste, and increasing co-product recovery from conventional mining. They will also enhance mineral recovery, emphasize small-footprint mining, foster low-impact tailings management, develop a skilled workforce, improve the sector’s public image, and support regulatory agencies in adopting tested innovations.

• Specific Proving Ground Competencies

  Centralized testing facilities can play a vital role in innovation within the mining industry by streamlining processes, enhancing collaboration, ensuring compliance, and ultimately fostering the development of safer, more efficient, and environmentally friendly mining technologies. The Proving Ground should establish these competencies.

  • Standardization of Procedures - Establish standardized testing protocols and methodologies, ensuring consistent results across various innovations to aid in comparing outcomes and determining the effectiveness of new technologies.

  • Resource Optimization - Reduce barriers to smaller companies and startups through shared resources such as advanced equipment, instrumentation, and skilled personnel, leading to cost savings and increased efficiency. This will deliver the benefit from access to high-quality testing without the burden of establishing their own facilities and staff.

  • Controlled Environment - Provide controlled environments that minimize external variables that could affect test outcomes. This is particularly important for mining technologies, where factors such as geological conditions and environmental impacts can substantially influence performance.

  • Data Collection and Analysis - Support comprehensive data collection and analysis, facilitating better R&D practices and outcomes. This leads to faster iteration and improvement of technologies based on empirical evidence derived from extensive testing.

  • Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing - Serves as a hub for collaboration among various stakeholders, including academic institutions, industry leaders, and regulatory bodies. Facilitate anonymization and publication. Such collaboration can enhance knowledge sharing and accelerate innovation within the mining sector.

  • Regulatory Compliance - Aids new mining technologies in compliance with safety and environmental regulations. The testing facilities can ensure that all tests adhere to relevant standards, facilitating smoother certification processes and reducing the time to market for new technologies.

  • Market Readiness - Accelerates market readiness by validating new technologies against real industry standards and performance expectations. Through testing at the proving ground, companies and investors gain confidence that these innovations are ready for increased investment and large-scale adoption.

  • Risk Management - Identify potential risks and challenges associated with new technologies in a controlled environment before they are deployed at actual mining operations. This enhances safety and reduces the likelihood of costly failures.

• Collaborative Approach and Investment

  Successful R&D efforts and proving grounds will be built on partnerships between eligible entities providing training opportunities for future American miners. This initiative aims to accelerate R&D progress from development to commercialization in the field. It will address gaps that neither universities nor the private sector typically prioritize for investment.

• Mine Technology Projects (TRL 2-6)

  Applicants should propose high impact mining technology projects (TRL 2-6) that require field testing to advance to TRL 7 and beyond.

  Projects are recommended, but not required to align with one of three technology development areas:

  1. Resource Characterization and Exploration

  2. Mining and Processing

  3. Equipment and Productivity

  An example list of Specific R&D Technology Areas of Interest that can fit into these three categories is below.

  DOE will fund mining technology projects that can be developed past laboratory/bench-scale and subsequently tested and demonstrated in a field-scale proving ground. Proving ground test beds will be constructed within the first two budget periods of the award, with technology testing occurring in later years. To ensure the award of high-quality projects through the proving ground, applicants are required to propose at least one mine technology project for development and validation at the facility. A maximum of two proposed projects per applicant may be awarded. If the applicant’s proposal is selected, these initial projects may be amended during negotiations and/or definitization.

  In addition to these initial projects, once established, DOE anticipates that these proving ground facilities will serve as platforms to host other DOE funded R&D activities and collaborations, and will be made available as resources to industry, academia, and other research partners. Utilization of these facilities for additional efforts will be subject to DOE programmatic priorities, merit review, and the availability of future funding.

• Research Focus: Innovative Critical Mineral Recovery

  Projects will develop and test innovative mining technologies for recovery of CMM from domestic ores. The goal is to enhance efficiencies, reduce environmental impact, minimize waste, and improve recovery by integrating automation, selective recovery, and modular mobile infrastructure for sustainable mining operations.

• Specific R&D Technology Areas of Interest

  The following is a list of R&D technical areas of interest and is not comprehensive. Other relevant technologies may be included in applications.

  • Comminution & Rock Mechanics

    • Comminution Efficiency - Technologies to improve mineral ore comminution efficiency and reduce grinding energy consumption (physical, chemical, electrochemical).

    • Rock Fracturing & Permeability - Techniques to improve rock fracturing, pore connection, and permeability, enhancing in situ critical mineral extraction efficacy (physical, mechanical).

  • Extraction: In situ Leaching - Methods for mineral extraction that minimize surface disruption and waste.

  • Automation & Robotics - Technologies to automate manual mining tasks (e.g., visual inspection, sampling, material movement) using drones and robotics; development of subsurface hardware, sensors, and computational tools for automation and robotics in ore digging, hauling, extraction, and processing.

  • Data & Sensing

    • Advanced Drilling - Drilling technologies with real-time sensing capabilities.

    • Real-time Material Tracking - Technologies to track and monitor mineralogy of feedstock/ore streams (solid, liquid, slurry) in real-time at the mine or processing plant.

    • Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML) - Algorithms to optimize equipment efficiency, resource extraction, and processing; development of autonomous vehicles and machinery; internet of things (IoT) applications for remote operations and monitoring.

    • Advanced Sensing - Methods or tools for detecting underground ore mineralization and low-grade mineral zones in tailings/refuse. Includes techniques for improved subsurface characterization for precision extraction, sensing while drilling, and exploratory drilling.

    • Data Utilization - Collection and utilization of big data, neural networks, AI/ML for subsurface/deep ground resource mapping and mineral exploration, including 3-D volumetric assessment.

• Key Objectives

  • Assess mining technologies for efficiency, cost, and recovery.

  • Develop methods to process low-grade ores, minimize waste rock, and reduce water use.

  • Implement selective recovery and physical concentration techniques for ore and tailings.

  • Create modular, reconfigurable units for flexible deployment and reduced site disturbance.

• Technical Requirements

  For the Proving Ground Facility:

  The Proving Ground must serve as a testbed for next-generation mining technologies, emphasizing modularity, data integration, and real-world validation of critical mineral extraction, processing, and environmental management solutions.

  General Infrastructure Requirements:

  • Location and Access: Must be within the United States with demonstrated access to mineralized materials or simulated deposits representative of CM (e.g., REEs, graphite, lithium, nickel, cobalt).

  • Operational Readiness: Must include site utilities, safety infrastructure, and permitting to enable field-scale operations up to TRL 7.

  • Modularity: Facility design must support plug-and-play testing of multiple technology platforms and allow for reconfiguration to accommodate different mineral systems and extraction processes.

  • Scalability: Capable of expanding operations to accommodate future demonstration projects or partnerships. Designs, flowsheets, and plans for a scalable field test facility handling large quantities of materials at a pilot scale.

  • Simultaneous Operation: Preference for proving grounds capable of operating multiple R&D projects simultaneously, even if only one is initially proposed.

  Technical Capabilities and Instrumentation:

  • Data Acquisition & Monitoring: Deploy a comprehensive digital monitoring system integrating geophysical, geochemical, and operational data into a unified platform (AI/ML-ready).

  • Autonomous & Remote Operations: Infrastructure should support operation and testing of autonomous or teleoperated vehicles, robotic systems, and AI-enabled sensing.

  • Environmental Monitoring: Real-time air, water, and soil monitoring systems must be included to assess environmental impacts and validate sustainable mining methods.

  • Simulation & Digital Twin: Integration with a digital twin environment for real-time simulation, prediction, and validation of process performance.

  Safety, Compliance, and Sustainability:

  • Safety Protocols: Must adhere to applicable Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety standards, with site-specific health and safety plans in place.

  • Environmental Compliance: Must demonstrate conformance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, and other applicable federal and state environmental regulations.

  • Sustainability Metrics: Establish baselines for emissions, waste, and energy use; must include monitoring and reporting mechanisms for continuous improvement.

  • Community and Workforce Integration: Include local workforce engagement and training opportunities.

  Workforce and Collaboration Hub:

  • Workforce and Training Integration: Should include provisions for hands-on training, workforce development, and educational use.

  • Visitor and Collaboration Center: For engaging with government, industry, academia, and public.

  For R&D Mine Technology Projects:

  Each applicant must identify up to two (2) initial projects to be demonstrated at the developed proving ground to validate its functionality and de-risk new mining technologies. Proposed initial projects under this funding opportunity may be asked to be amended during negotiations if selected.

  Technical Maturity:

  • Readiness Level: Proposed technologies must be at TRL 2–6 at project start and demonstrate advancement increasing at least one TRL by project completion.

  • Integration with Proving Ground: Must demonstrate compatibility with the facility’s modular systems, safety framework, and data acquisition protocols.

  • Performance Metrics: Include clear performance indicators (e.g., recovery efficiency, selectivity, energy intensity, environmental footprint) and justification of economic and technological advantages over conventional methods.

  Environmental and Safety Considerations:

  • Environmental Footprint: Each project must quantify reductions in waste, emissions, or water/energy consumption compared to baseline operations.

  • Safety Plan: Provide a project-specific safety and hazard mitigation plan consistent with the Proving Ground’s operational safety framework.

  Collaboration and Commercialization:

  • Industry and Academic Partnerships: Demonstrate engagement with industry and/or academia, to support commercialization and workforce development.

  • Transition Plan: Include a post-demonstration pathway outlining next steps toward commercialization or follow-on pilot deployment.

• Technology Readiness Level (TRL)

  Research should begin between TRL 2-6 and aim to advance at a minimum of one TRL by the completion of work at the proving ground.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, the NOFO describes several programmatic benefits associated with the proving grounds:

• Market Readiness and Investor Confidence
  The proving grounds are explicitly framed as a way to accelerate market readiness by validating new technologies against real industry standards and performance expectations. Testing at these facilities is intended to give companies and investors greater confidence that innovations are ready for larger-scale adoption.

• Risk Management and Safer Deployment
  Proving grounds allow identification of technical and operational risks in a controlled environment before deploying technologies in active mining operations. This supports improved safety and reduces the likelihood of costly failures.

• National Resource and Ecosystem Access
  Once established, DOE envisions that these facilities will serve as a national resource, accessible to:

  • Multiple DOE offices,

  • Industry partners,

  • Academia, and

  • Other research organizations.

  DOE anticipates that, beyond the initial projects, the proving grounds will be used to host additional DOE-funded R&D activities and collaborations, subject to DOE priorities, merit review, and future funding availability.

• Training, Skills, and Workforce Development
  The program is designed to provide a training platform, disseminating skills, technologies, practices, and expertise needed for responsible mining and critical materials supply chains.

All of these benefits are explicitly tied in the NOFO to strengthening secure, resilient domestic critical mineral and material supply networks and restoring U.S. prominence in the mining sector.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The NOFO specifies the following key dates:

• Application Deadline: December 15, 2025

• Anticipated Selection Notification Date: January 16, 2026

• Anticipated Conditional Award Date: January 23, 2026

• Anticipated Award Date (project start): June 15, 2026

• Estimated Period of Performance: June 15, 2026 – June 14, 2030 (approximately 4 years)

Where does this funding come from?

The initiative is issued by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), Critical Minerals and Materials (CMM) Program.

Awards made under this NOFO will be funded, in whole or in part, with funds appropriated under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).

The activities support Sections 7001(a) and 7002(g) of the Energy Act of 2020, as funded by IIJA Section 41003(c), and are part of a broader federal effort to advance and potentially commercialize technologies that use unconventional resources to produce critical minerals and materials for U.S. energy, national security, and commodity needs.

Who is eligible to apply?

• Eligible domestic entities (as applicants/recipients):

  • Institutions of higher education

  • For-profit entities

  • Nonprofit organizations

  • State and local governmental entities

  • Indian Tribes (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 5304)

• To qualify as a domestic entity, an organization must:

  • Be organized under the laws of a U.S. state or territory or under U.S. federal law,

  • Have majority domestic ownership and control, and

  • Have a physical place of business in the United States.

• FFRDCs and federal agencies:

  • DOE FFRDCs: Eligible to participate only as subrecipients, not as prime recipients.

  • Non-DOE FFRDCs: Eligible to participate as subrecipients, not as recipients.

  • Federal agencies and instrumentalities (other than DOE): May generally participate as subrecipients but are typically not eligible to be recipients.

  • NETL is explicitly not eligible to receive awards under this announcement and may not be included as a recipient or subrecipient.

• Foreign entities:

  • In general, foreign entities are not eligible to apply as either recipients or subrecipients.

  • Foreign participation is only possible under limited circumstances with an explicit written waiver request included in the application (and, for each foreign subrecipient, a separate waiver).

• Work location requirement:

  • All work must be performed in the United States unless a waiver of this requirement is requested and approved. Costs for work performed outside the U.S. are unallowable without such a waiver.

• Other statutory ineligibilities:

  • Entities on the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals list are prohibited from doing business with the U.S. government and are not eligible.

  • Nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engaged in lobbying activities after December 31, 1995, are not eligible to apply.

  • Entities of Concern (as defined in NOFO Part 2) are prohibited from participating in projects under this NOFO.

• Number of applications per entity:

  • An entity may submit more than one application, provided that each application describes a unique, scientifically distinct project.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals will be scored according to the following criteria:

1. Proving Ground Merit (45%) – Strength of the proposed proving ground: infrastructure readiness, environmental and siting considerations, stakeholder buy-in, risk mitigation, maintenance planning, and ability to support training and real-world testing.

2. Mining Technology Merit (10%) – Technical quality of initial mine technology projects: clarity of current state and advancement path, relevance to topic goals, scalability considerations, supporting data, and risk mitigation.

3. Technical Approach (30%) – Feasibility and clarity of the overall plan: logical SOPO, ability to host multiple technologies, awareness of facility limitations, alignment of budget to scope, and overall understanding of proving-ground operations.

4. Team Capabilities (15%) – Strength of the team: PI expertise, integrated workplan, prior mining facility experience, maturation planning, and knowledge of permitting, NEPA, and mining operations at scale.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

DOE anticipates awarding cooperative agreements under this NOFO, which include a statement of DOE’s “substantial involvement” in the work performed under the resulting awards. For cooperative agreements, DOE does not limit its involvement to the administrative requirements of the award. Instead, DOE has substantial involvement in the direction and redirection of the technical aspects of the project. DOE’s substantial involvement in resulting awards may include the following:

A. DOE shares responsibility with the recipient for the management, control, direction, and performance of the project.

B. DOE may intervene in the conduct or performance of work under this award for programmatic reasons. Intervention includes the interruption or modification of the conduct or performance of project activities.

C. DOE may redirect or discontinue funding the project based on the outcome of DOE’s evaluation of the project at the Go/No-Go decision point(s).

D. DOE participates in major project decision-making processes.

E. Conducting annual project review meetings and monthly status meetings to ensure adequate progress and that the work accomplishes the program and project objectives. Recommending alternate approaches or shifting work emphasis, if needed.

F. DOE may be involved with external usage of the established Proving Ground once the initial Mine Technology project(s) are completed. DOE's authorized representatives have the right to make site visits upon reasonable notice at a mutually agreeable time established by the parties to review project accomplishments and management control systems and to provide technical assistance, if required. You must provide, and must require your subawardees to provide, reasonable access to facilities, office space, resources, and assistance for the safety and convenience of the government representatives in the performance of their duties. All site visits and evaluations shall be subject to the health, safety and environmental policies required of all visitors and shall be performed in a manner that does not unduly interfere with or delay the work.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

We can find partners, manage proposal preparation between partners, and write your proposal. Flat Fee + Success Fee rate can be quoted depending on the scope of work.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

• See the solicitation here.

CIRM DISC5 Awards: Funding Opportunity for Discovery Stage Research

Executive Summary:

CIRM’s DISC5 Awards fund up to $2.5 million per project for small, collaborative teams to run high-risk, exploratory discovery research in stem cell biology, genetic research, and regenerative medicine. Each project must be co-led by a California-based Principal Investigator and Co-Investigator from different labs, with human stem cells or genetic research central to the approach. Applications for the current cycle open November 14, 2025 and are due January 30, 2026 at 2:00 pm PT.

How much funding would I receive?

Each DISC5 award can request up to $2,500,000 in total project costs (including direct, facilities, and indirect costs) for a project lasting up to 3 years. Budgets at or above $900,000 in any single project year require additional justification and may be adjusted during review and negotiation.

What could I use the funding for?

The DISC5 Awards will support exploratory and innovative foundational research led by pairs of interdisciplinary investigators applying a range of technologies and approaches to address fundamental knowledge gaps or bottlenecks in stem cell biology and/or regenerative medicine. Proposals should aim to achieve one or more of the following outcomes:

• Advancing fundamental understanding of human stem and progenitor cells as they pertain to human health and disease.

• Advancing the use of stem cells to interrogate disease mechanisms to uncover biological insights thatcould enable therapeutic target and/or biomarker discovery.

• Gaining mechanistic insights to address key scientific or technical bottlenecks in stem cell, genetherapy, and/or other regenerative medicine approaches.

• Advancing applicability of stem cells, gene therapies, and/or other regenerative medicine approaches to all affected populations.

Proposals focused on validating or optimizing a therapeutic approach or candidate are not aligned with this program’s focus on foundational discovery.

Required Activities: Activities associated with managing, preserving, and sharing data and knowledge from the study

Allowable Activities:

• Any basic research activities that meet the DISC5 objective to address knowledge gaps or bottlenecks in stem cell biology with relevance to human biology and disease, where human stem cells or genetic research is part of the central approach or hypothesis, and that seek to achieve one or more of the outcomes listed in “Scope and Structure.”

• Partnering activities with patient-centered organizations or other project-relevant community groups.

• Travel and accommodation expenditures associated with attendance of CIRM organized meetings and conferences. See additional details in Discovery Program Meetings and Conferences, pg. 13.

• Activities to support outreach or communication of research plans or outcomes with the wider public.

• Engagement activities with trainees supported through CIRM’s EDUC or INFR programs

Unallowable Activities:

• Therapeutic or other commercial development activities including lead optimization, manufacturing, pre-clinical toxicology and pharmacology studies and other activities targeted by CIRM’s PDEV and CLIN programs.

• Costs of activities performed by a separate out-of-state organization that retains intellectual property or independent publication rights in any intellectual property (e.g., invention, technology, data) arising out of the CIRM-funded project.

• Costs incurred on or before the date of ICOC approval.

• Activities already budgeted or paid for under a prior, existing or pending CIRM award or which are already supported by another funder.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, DISC5 awardees benefit from:

Visibility and credibility: CIRM is one of the nation’s most recognized regenerative medicine funders. A DISC5 award strengthens credibility with partners, investors, and follow-on funders.

Positioning for future non-dilutive funding: DISC5 supports early high-risk data generation, enabling teams to later apply for CIRM’s translational and clinical programs or alternative funding sources.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

For the current cycle:

• Application deadline: January 30, 2026 at 2:00 pm PT

• Grants Working Group (GWG) review: ~60–90 days after the deadline

• Board approval and Notice of Award: ~150 days after the deadline

• Project start: Must begin within 90 days of award approval

  Most awardees can expect to start work approximately 6–8 months after the application deadline.

Where does this funding come from?

The DISC5 Awards are funded by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), a voter-created state agency dedicated to accelerating stem cell, genetic, and regenerative medicine research. DISC5 is part of CIRM’s Discovery Program under its 2024 Strategic Allocation Framework.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible organizations:
Must be a California Organization (non-profit or for-profit) as defined by CIRM. More than 50% of W-2 employees must be full-time California residents paying CA income tax. The PI must be located in California. California subsidiaries must retain IP rights from the project.

Eligible teams:
• Exactly one PI and one Co-Investigator (Co-I).
• Both must be employed by California Organizations.
• Each must commit at least 5% effort.
• PI and Co-I must be from different labs.
• The team must include an experienced Data Project Manager.

Project requirements:
• Must include human stem cell and/or genetic research as a central component.
• Any non-human models must be strongly justified and validated with human models when possible.
• Applications must be complete, accurate, and non-duplicative across CIRM programs.

Application limits:
• An individual may serve as PI on only one DISC5 application per cycle.
• An individual may serve on no more than two DISC5 applications total per cycle (as PI or Co-I).
• Co-funding is not required.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

CIRM funds projects that score highly across five criteria:
• Significance: Advance foundational stem cell or regenerative medicine knowledge with broad impact.
• Innovation: Use novel approaches or cross-disciplinary methods.
• Rationale: Present a sound scientific basis and justified experimental models.
• Plan & Design: Offer a clear, feasible research plan with strong team coordination and realistic budgets/timelines.
• Population Impact: Consider genetic, environmental, and community factors to ensure findings apply across diverse California populations

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• No therapeutic development (manufacturing, lead optimization, preclinical tox/pharm, IND-enabling studies).
• Out-of-state organizations cannot retain IP or publication rights for any CIRM-funded work.
• No costs incurred prior to ICOC approval.
• Applications must be complete, accurate, and not duplicative with other pending CIRM submissions.
• Projects must start within 90 days of award approval.
• Only one no-cost extension (max 6 months) may be requested—and approval is not guaranteed.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive proposal will likely take 120–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for $13000 Initial Fee + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Funding Announcement Here.

Making Obstetrics Care Smart (MOCS) – ARPA-H

Executive Summary:

ARPA-H’s Making Obstetrics Care Smart (MOCS) program, run by the Scalable Solutions Office (SSO), is soliciting proposals under ISO ARPA-H-SOL-26-143 to develop new placenta health tests and noninvasive, wireless, AI-backed monitoring tools that can better predict fetal oxygen status and guide intervention during labor and delivery. Pre-proposal discussions are required between December 15–19, 2025, and full proposals are due by 12:00 PM ET on January 21, 2026 via the ARPA-H Solutions Portal.

How much funding would I receive?

Specific funding amounts are not listed so practically, you should assume that budgets must be tailored to the technical scope required to:

• Develop and validate placenta risk-stratification tools, and/or

• Design, build, and test noninvasive, wireless fetal monitoring technologies integrated with AI/ML decision support.

What could I use the funding for?

Based on the stated technical objectives, allowable work is expected to focus on R&D activities according to these guidelines:

The Problem

• The United States has the highest rate of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality of any wealthy country, despite spending more per capita on maternal care.

• This unacceptable status quo is largely the result of a 50-year-old, imprecise tool used during labor and delivery to monitor babies and determine whether they are getting enough oxygen—a tool called the fetal electronic monitor.  

• Without reliable data, confusion prevails and it’s tough to make smart, informed decisions. Women end up having unnecessary cesarean sections and babies are born with low oxygen levels, which sometimes cause lifelong complications.  

• This confusion leads to the dissolution of trust between patients and the medical system, massive lawsuits, and ultimately can cause medical providers to quit obstetrics, exacerbating the healthcare provider shortage.   

The Solution

• The Making Obstetrics Care Smart (MOCS) program aims to address this combination of problems by developing technology to help families and care teams plan for and have safe deliveries.  

• Our goal is ambitious: use advanced diagnostics and smart technology to make births safe. The program seeks to generate tools to predict both chronic and acute fetal status and provide the best recommendations for intervention, giving peace of mind to the care providers, mothers, and families making choices for critical labor and delivery care.

• MOCS will develop better ways to track a baby’s status during labor. First, developing a new test that will assess the health of the placenta to understand which patients are at high risk for complications during labor. Second, designing new types of noninvasive, wireless sensors and AI-backed technology to gain real-time information about a baby’s oxygen levels and make smart decisions during delivery.  

• If successful, MOCS will enable safe deliveries for all, drastically improving the health of women and children.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, competitive ARPA-H programs like MOCS typically create several strategic benefits for companies and teams:

• Government validation and credibility
  Being selected by ARPA-H signals strong technical merit and alignment with high-priority national health goals in maternal and infant outcomes. That endorsement can de-risk you in the eyes of hospitals, payers, strategic partners, and investors.

• Visibility in a critical health domain
  MOCS targets one of the most pressing and visible failures in U.S. healthcare: maternal and infant morbidity and mortality tied to inadequate fetal monitoring. Demonstrated progress here can drive significant attention from media, advocacy groups, and professional societies.

• Access to a curated ecosystem
  The program explicitly aims to convene “the best researchers and collaborators in labor and delivery, including healthcare providers, hospitals, payers, attorneys, and families,” creating a structured network of stakeholders that can accelerate pilots, studies, and adoption.

• Non-dilutive capital to mature your product
  ARPA-H support is non-dilutive, enabling you to build and validate high-risk capabilities—advanced diagnostics, sensors, and AI—without giving up equity. That can translate into stronger valuations in later private rounds or at exit.

• Stronger exit and partnership potential
  A validated, government-funded platform for safer labor and delivery can be attractive to medical device manufacturers, hospital system partners, payers, and women’s health platforms looking to expand into perinatal safety and monitoring.

These strategic benefits are not guaranteed, but they are typical of successful participation in high-profile federal health R&D programs.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

From the publicly available materials:

• Proposers’ Day: December 11, 2025 (hybrid; Washington, DC + virtual).

• Required pre-proposal discussions: December 15–19, 2025 (request via ARPA-H Solutions Portal).

• Full Proposal Due: January 21, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET (submitted via ARPA-H Solutions Portal).

The documents provided do not specify:

• Exact dates for selection decisions,

• Award announcement dates, or

• When funds will be obligated or projects will start.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), specifically through its Scalable Solutions Office (SSO), under ISO ARPA-H-SOL-26-143 for the Making Obstetric Care Smart (MOCS) program.

Who is eligible to apply?

Academia, non-profit organizations, for-profit entities, hospitals, community health centers, and non-federal research centers. Non-U.S. entities may participate if compliant with all applicable laws.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Official scoring criteria have not been released but typical criteria for ARPA-H opportunities are below (in descending importance):

1. Scientific/technical merit—innovative, complete plans with clear deliverables, risks, and mitigations;

2. Contribution & relevance to ARPA-H’s mission—transformative potential, unmet need, commercialization/transition thinking, and IP/software approaches that enable adoption (preference for open standards/OSS where appropriate);

3. Team capabilities/experience—track record delivering similar efforts on budget/schedule;

4. Cost/budget alignment with the technical approach. ARPA-H encourages proposing the best technical solution over low-risk/minimal-uncertainty concepts.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Attendance at Proposers’ Day is optional.
  It is not required for submission or selection, though ARPA-H notes it may help with teaming.

• Pre-proposal discussions are required.
  Pre-proposal discussions between December 15–19, 2025 must be scheduled via the ARPA-H Solutions Portal and are a required step before full proposal submission.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive full proposal will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our support is available for $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Kronos Program – Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO)

Executive Summary:

Space Systems Command’s Kronos CSO is soliciting commercial prototype solutions that strengthen Space Force command and control (C2). Submissions must align to Areas of Interest (AOIs) (Operational C2, Battle Management, Space Intelligence). Phase I requires a brief overview deck (5 slides) and a 5-page white paper; selected offerors may be invited to Phase II for full proposals. Phase I materials are due Dec 11, 2025 at 12:00 pm MT.

How much funding would I receive?

The CSO does not specify dollar amounts but likely in the millions of dollar range. The Government may issue OTA or FAR-based prototype awards; follow-on production is possible if the prototype is successful, subject to available funding and approvals.

What could I use the funding for?

Prototype development aligned to an Area of Interest below:

AOI 01: Operational Command and Control

The Kronos PMO is seeking innovative solutions that enable end-to-end C2 functionality, including planning, preparation, execution, and assessment, within a unified, interoperable framework. Key capabilities include developing and prioritizing commander’s intent; supporting both deliberate and dynamic target development and effects-based operations; conducting capability and feasibility analysis; facilitating commander’s decision-making and force assignment; monitoring real-time mission execution with adaptability to changing conditions; performing combat assessment; and providing comprehensive shared situational awareness across joint, and allied partners. The innovative solution must be scalable, modular, and extensible to support evolving mission needs and emerging technologies. Cloud-native design, DevSecOps practices, AI/ML integration, advanced data management, and zero trust cybersecurity principles are highly desired. Submissions should demonstrate how the proposed solution delivers a cohesive, resilient, and adaptable C2 capability aligned with U.S. Space Force operational priorities and enables agile, data-driven decision-making across the Kronos Enterprise.

AOI 02: Battle Management

The Kronos PMO is seeking an integrated Space Attack Planning Toolkit to enable advanced effects-based planning and coordination across the Kronos Enterprise. The desired solution will support the ability to match space resources to effects-based requirements by synthesizing commander’s guidance, effects, and operational priorities with real-time resource status, including tactical units and ISR assets. The solution should expedite C2 planning and enhance coordination between operational and tactical levels. Key capabilities include integration of tactical C2 assessment tools to enable rapid course of action development, feasibility modeling, probability of success analysis, and collateral impact assessment. The solution should support tactical C2 planning by providing real-time status, warnings, and orders to tactical units, while capturing and managing CONOPs and CONEMPs to ensure coherent command relationships and execution pathways. Additionally, the toolkit must enable tactical C2 monitoring and visualization of ongoing effects, support dynamic guidance updates, and facilitate responsive coordination with tactical units within established rules of engagement. The solution must be modular, scalable, and designed for seamless integration with the broader Kronos C2 architecture, with an emphasis on agility, real-time data integration, and operational relevance.

AOI 03: Space Intelligence

The Kronos PMO is seeking an integrated Intelligence solution to enhance decision advantage for joint and coalition forces across the Kronos Enterprise. The desired solution must unify three core intelligence capabilities: battlespace characterization, collection operations, and targeting. Battlespace characterization should enable continuous understanding and prediction of adversary capabilities, tactics, dispositions, centers of gravity, and courses of action, with dynamic assessments that inform targeting and operational decision-making. Collection operations must support the tasking and synchronization of ISR assets and exploitation resources to acquire actionable data on the operational environment, adversary activity, and infrastructure, closing intelligence gaps and enhancing situational awareness. The targeting component must provide a continuous, analytic process to select, prioritize, and engage targets in alignment with commander objectives, integrating intelligence at every stage of the targeting cycle. The solution must facilitate seamless coordination across functional disciplines and between operational and tactical levels. Scalability, modularity, and interoperability with the broader Kronos C2 architecture are essential, with emphasis on real-time data integration, dynamic visualization, and AI/ML-driven analytic capabilities. Submissions should clearly demonstrate how the solution enhances intelligence-driven operations and supports timely, informed, and effective decision-making across the joint force.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, participation offers major strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Selection through the CSO process signals that your company’s industrialized construction approach meets urgent defense infrastructure modernization goals. That endorsement strengthens credibility with defense primes, base infrastructure offices, and private investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
Awardees gain visibility through announcements, government communications, and defense industry press—establishing your firm as a recognized innovator in resilient military housing and off-site manufacturing.

Follow-On Production Opportunities:
Successful prototypes can transition directly to follow-on production agreements without further competition, potentially unlocking multi-installation, multi-year build programs.

Nondilutive Growth and Exit Value:
Winning an OT award provides nondilutive capital and validation, often leading to higher valuations and stronger acquisition potential for defense and construction-tech firms.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Phase I (Initial Submission): Overview briefing (≤5 slides plus required Quad Chart) and a 5-page white paper; optional pitch session may be requested.

• Phase II (By Invitation): Technical Approach, Statement of Work, and Price proposal per RFP instructions.

• Awards/Timing: The Government may fund all, some, part of, or none of the proposals and may incrementally fund awards; timing is subject to availability of funds.

Where does this funding come from?

Space Systems Command, Kronos Program of Record, using primarily Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) authority under 10 U.S.C. §§ 4021-4022, with potential for FAR-based contracts where appropriate

Who is eligible to apply?

Offerors proposing innovative commercial prototypes addressing the AOIs (page 5).

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Solutions that show Government interest and technical merit, align with AOIs, demonstrate integration feasibility, modern software practices, and offer reasonable pricing. Vendor viability and security posture are also considered.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Prototype focus; follow-on production not guaranteed.

• All Phase I & II submissions unclassified; Phase II performers should hold required clearances if classified work is proposed.

• Data/IP rights negotiated per DFARS (FAR-based) or via OTA; Government intends to acquire only necessary rights.

• Export controls (ITAR/EAR) and FOCI disclosure apply.

• Non-Government advisors (FFRDC/SETA/SE&I/A&AS) may review under NDAs.

• OCI analysis/mitigation required at Phase II.

• CRWL considerations per FY25 NDAA may affect award eligibility.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive powerpoint and white paper will take 75-100 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Overview Briefing and White Paper for $7000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.