NASA ROSES A.13: Accelerating Earth Solutions (AES)

Quick Answer

NASA's Accelerating Earth Solutions (AES) program element is a newly amended addition to ROSES-2025 that consolidates what were previously separate program elements, including agriculture, disaster resilience, natural resources, health and air quality, water resources, wildland fire, energy systems, and resilient infrastructure, into a single, broader solicitation. The program seeks to accelerate the use of Earth-observing satellite data in real-world decision-making by funding work across three distinct tracks: Needs and Opportunities, Solutions Development, and Scaling Impact.

Selection priority is given to proposals that align with US resilience, resources, economic growth, health, and security; that increase the use of AI and machine learning; that cross boundaries between Earth Action thematic areas; that translate basic research or remote sensing advances into deployable solutions; and that draw on data from NASA's Earth observing missions, particularly NISAR, PACE, and SWOT, including combined approaches that pair NASA data with commercial satellite data available under the CSDA program.

Three Funding Sub-Elements

1. Needs and Opportunities (up to 1 year)

Supports early-stage engagement with federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial decision-makers to identify needs, build partnerships, and co-design solution concepts so that NASA Earth data can be meaningfully integrated into decision-making frameworks. Required activities include understanding societal decision-making challenges, identifying relevant end-user organizations, assessing end-user needs and data practices, evaluating end-user capacity to adopt new solutions, and determining feasibility and viability of potential solution concepts. Deliverables include a project/engagement plan, a midpoint report, communications materials, and a final report identifying opportunities for integrating NASA Earth data into future solutions.

2. Solutions Development (up to 3 years)

Focused on co-developing, validating, and transitioning solutions into operational deployment within an end-user's decision-making workflow. Applicants must have already identified users and conceptualized a solution determined to be desirable, feasible, and viable. At least one end-user representative with direct decision-making authority must be a formal member of the project team. Continuation beyond Year 1 depends on quarterly progress reports and an annual report demonstrating assessed end-user needs and expected outputs from models, applications, or decision support tools.

3. Scaling Impact (up to 2 years)

Aimed at expanding existing NASA Earth observation decision-support capabilities, either horizontally (reaching more users) or vertically (new tools or new observations), building on existing operational systems whether or not previously NASA-funded. Proposers with prior NASA Applied Sciences or Earth Action funding must document the achieved impact of that prior work and show how it informs the proposed scaling effort. As with Solutions Development, at least one end-user representative with decision-making authority must be on the project team, and continuation beyond Year 1 depends on quarterly and annual reporting demonstrating end-user needs assessment, how existing capabilities inform the scaling effort, and expected outputs.

Proposers may submit multiple proposals but each individual proposal may address only one sub-element, and multiple proposals within the same sub-element must be differentiated by distinct topics, goals, or objectives.

Scope of Solicited Work

Proposed work must primarily benefit the United States, focusing on US states, territories, and tribal lands, or demonstrating direct benefit to national priorities. Eligible thematic areas include agriculture, disasters, natural resources, health and air quality, water, wildland fire, energy, and infrastructure, with cross-cutting challenges especially encouraged. Examples cited in the solicitation include wind damage risk assessments, agricultural pest and nutrient stress management (including screwworm and armyworm), early warning systems for infectious and vector-borne disease, integrated terrestrial and coastal water monitoring, conservation and hunting/fishing community support, urban and rural infrastructure resilience, and improved real-time multi-sensor Earth observability.

Eligibility

Open to US institutions of all types, including academic institutions, non-governmental organizations, non-profits, and private sector for-profit entities. Non-traditional and cross-sector partners are explicitly welcomed. Work that relies on proprietary data or methods that will not be publicly disseminated is ineligible for this element and should instead be directed to ROSES element A.10 (INNOVATE). Federal agencies other than NASA are not eligible for funding under this element, though government personnel may participate as unfunded collaborators. Non-US organizations may participate on a no-exchange-of-funds basis, with their portion of the work funded through other sources.

Proposal Format and Page Limits

The Science/Technical/Management (S/T/M) section is limited to 10 pages, excluding references and the Table of Work Effort. All proposals must describe alignment with the Scope of Solicited Work and the Earth Science to Action (ES2A) strategy. Needs and Opportunities proposals must describe the user engagement and co-design strategy and the potential for improving decision-making. Solutions Development and Scaling Impact proposals must additionally describe current and expected decision-making methods, the end-user's authority to act on project results, at least one supporting NASA Earth observation or model, methodology rationale (including AI/ML use where applicable), anticipated impact, and a transition plan. Scaling Impact proposals must also describe existing decision-support capabilities and the demonstrated impact of prior solutions.

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review

All proposals will be evaluated under NASA's dual-anonymous peer review (DAPR) process, meaning proposers do not know reviewer identities and reviewers do not learn proposer identities until after evaluation. The anonymized proposal document may name the end-user organization but not the individual Co-I representing it. Required anonymized components include the S/T/M section (with numerically formatted reference callouts), references, an anonymized Table of Personnel and Work Effort, and a redacted budget and budget narrative. A separate, non-anonymized "Expertise and Resources Not Anonymized" document must be uploaded containing team member roles and affiliations, a non-anonymized Table of Personnel and Work Effort, biographical sketches and Current and Pending Support in SciENcv format, letters of support, and facilities/equipment descriptions. The Open Science and Data Management Plan (2 pages) must also be anonymized. Total Budget must be uploaded separately and unredacted. Proposals that fail to follow anonymization or formatting requirements may be returned without review.

Research Security Training Requirement

Effective August 5, 2026, all PIs and any Co-Is dedicating 10% or more of their time to a proposed award must certify completion of research security training, satisfied by either the four NSF Research Security Training modules or the SECURE Center's condensed equivalent.

Evaluation Criteria

Proposals are evaluated on Intrinsic Merit, Relevance, and Cost. Relevance evaluation considers alignment with the program's priority topics, the Scope of Solicited Work, and the ES2A strategy, along with the scalability and substance of the proposed decision-making impact. For Needs and Opportunities, Intrinsic Merit considers the quality of the user engagement and needs assessment strategy and its potential for lasting impact. For Solutions Development and Scaling Impact, Intrinsic Merit considers the likelihood of substantive, scalable impact; the quality of the co-development and adoption strategy; clarity around the end-user's decision-making authority and process; innovation and technical feasibility; and the quality of the transition plan into user operations. Cost evaluation includes the quality of the management plan and project timeline.

What are the formatting and page limits?

Technical proposals are capped at 15 pages (graphs, charts, and tables may run up to 10 additional oversized pages), submitted as unclassified PDFs in 12-point Times New Roman with one-inch margins. The mandatory cover page and signed Representation and Certification (Attachment 0002) are excluded from the page count, as are supplementary appendices.

Data and Publication Policy

All useful data, software, and peer-reviewed publications resulting from funded work must be made publicly available by the end of the award period of performance, consistent with NASA's Science Information Policy. The program also seeks science conducted per Executive Order 14303, Restoring Gold Standard Science, meaning work that is reproducible, transparent, communicative of error and uncertainty, collaborative, interdisciplinary, skeptical of its own findings, structured for falsifiability, and treats negative results as valid outcomes.

Pre-Proposal Teleconference

NASA will hold an optional pre-proposal teleconference on Monday, August 31, 2026, from 1:00 to 2:30 PM Eastern Time, on a first-to-dial-in basis with no advance reservation required. The session will be hosted by program officer Dr. Erin Urquhart. Connection details:

Submission Logistics

Proposals must be submitted electronically through NSPIRES at https://nspires.nasaprs.com. No hard copies are permitted. Applicants who need to submit via Grants.gov must request access at least 30 days before the due date from the main point of contact, with a copy to sara@nasa.gov. The Grants.gov funding opportunity number is NNH25ZDA001N-AES.

Additional Resources

Contact our team for the PDF solicitation.

Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Enterprise Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) - FA8652-26-S-C003

Last updated: July 12, 2026. Verify current status of any referenced Spiral on SAM.gov before submitting — Spirals open, close, and are added on a rolling basis.

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in Additional Resources).

Quick Answer

The AFRL Enterprise CSO is a standing, indefinite-duration umbrella announcement that the Air Force Research Laboratory uses to launch specific competitive solicitations, called Spirals, across nearly 100 technology Areas of Interest spanning air, space, cyber/electronic warfare, cross-domain, and basic research. Companies don't apply to the Enterprise CSO directly; they respond to an individual Spiral issued under it, using either a one-step process (Commercial Solutions Proposal) or a two-step process (Commercial Solutions Brief, followed by an invited Commercial Solutions Proposal). Awards can be FAR Part 12 commercial contracts or Other Transaction Prototype agreements.

Unlike many CSOs, foreign participation here is prohibited outright — this is not a "restricted but possible" eligibility gate.

Key Facts at a Glance

•     Administering agency: Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)

•     Solicitation number: FA8652-26-S-C003 (Amendment 01, 8 July 2026)

•     Authority: 10 U.S.C. § 3458; R-DFARS Subpart 212.70; NDAA FY22 § 803

•     Opportunity type: Enterprise-level CSO umbrella — actual competitions occur under individual Spirals

•     Duration: Active indefinitely; updated annually until terminated

•     Areas of Interest: Approximately 94 sub-areas across five domains (Air, Space, Cyber/Electronic Warfare, Cross-Domain, Basic Research)

•     Application format: One-Step: Commercial Solutions Proposal (CSP). Two-Step: Commercial Solutions Brief (CSB) — PowerPoint plus white paper — then an invited CSP

•     Award mechanisms: FAR Part 12 fixed-price contract, or Other Transaction for Prototype (OTP) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022, including follow-on production

•     Typical award size: Not specified in the solicitation. Awards under comparable DoD CSO/OTP mechanisms have ranged from roughly $100,000 for early feasibility efforts to $10 million or more for larger prototype demonstrations — actual amounts depend entirely on the Spiral and funding available

•     Who can apply: U.S. commercial companies, small businesses, nontraditional defense contractors, nonprofit research institutions

•     Who cannot apply: Foreign persons and FOCI (foreign-owned, controlled, or influenced) entities — prohibited outright, no exceptions stated

•     Security requirement: NIST SP 800-171 compliance for Covered Defense Information; a Science and Technology Protection Initial Risk Review for selectable proposals

How This CSO Actually Works: Enterprise CSO + Spirals

This is the single most important structural fact to understand before pursuing this opportunity: FA8652-26-S-C003 is not itself a solicitation you submit against. It's a framework document that authorizes AFRL Mission Organizations (its internal directorates) to issue individual Spirals — the actual competitive solicitations — at any time, tied to specific Areas of Interest.

Each Spiral specifies its own Areas of Interest in scope, submission format, dates, and evaluation criteria, and states whether it's Open (accepts submissions on a rolling basis) or Closed (narrows scope, hard deadline — late submissions are handled per FAR 52.212-1(c) and generally not considered). It will also state whether it uses a One-Step or Two-Step process.

One-Step Spiral (Commercial Solutions Proposal): Submit a complete CSP directly — technical proposal, price proposal, and Statement of Work. Evaluated once, then categorized as Selectable, Selectable/Insufficient Funding, or Not Selectable.

Two-Step Spiral (Commercial Solutions Brief, then Commercial Solutions Proposal): Step 1 is a CSB — a PowerPoint briefing plus a white paper (the Government may substitute a Pitch instead). It's evaluated on Technical Merit/Applicability and Funding Availability, weighted equally. If categorized Selectable, you're invited to Step 2: a full CSP (technical proposal, price proposal, SOW), evaluated on Technical Merit/Applicability, Importance to Agency Programs, Price, and Funding Availability, all weighted equally.

Because new Spirals can be issued at any time against any of the roughly 94 Areas of Interest, companies with relevant dual-use technology should monitor SAM.gov regularly rather than treating this as a one-time application.

Active Spiral as of This Writing

As of mid-2026, AFRL has an active Centralized, Open Two-Step Spiral (FA8652-26-S-C005) accepting Commercial Solutions Briefs, currently scoped to the Foundational Technologies (AFRL/RE) mission organization, open April 30, 2026 through April 30, 2027. This is a live, actionable entry point today — but confirm current scope and status on SAM.gov, since additional Spirals may have opened, or this one may have been amended, since this page was last updated.

Areas of Interest

Solution Briefs and Proposals must map to one or more of the Areas of Interest below. Each AOI sits within one of five domains; the specific Spiral you respond to will define which AOIs are currently in scope.

1. Air Domain Technologies

•     Human Performance Optimization — physical, cognitive, and human-machine interface techniques that enhance warfighter capability and resilience.

•     Aerospace Medicine and Operational Health — physiological monitoring, environmental protection, and medical support for air, space, and cyber operations.

•     Warfighter Survivability and Protection — personal protective equipment, threat detection, casualty care, and directed-energy protection.

•     Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences — perception, decision-making, and human-system interaction in complex environments.

•     Advanced Air Vehicles — next-generation aircraft: high-speed flight, maneuverability, stealth, optionally-manned configurations.

•     Air Propulsion Systems — turbine engines, scramjets and ramjets, and advanced powerplants.

•     Aerodynamics and Flight Sciences — flight control, stability, and performance research for maneuverability and endurance.

•     Hypersonics — materials, propulsion, guidance, and control for Mach 5+ flight.

•     Advanced Weapons Technologies — smart munitions, precision-guided munitions, novel warhead designs.

•     Energetics and Propellants — advanced energetic materials, propellants, and explosives with improved safety and performance.

•     Guidance Navigation and Control — accuracy, maneuverability, and target discrimination systems.

•     Munitions Survivability and Countermeasures — munition robustness against countermeasures and hostile environments.

•     Rocket Systems — solid, liquid, and hybrid rocket motors, propellants, thrust vector control, and tactical missile integration.

•     Nuclear Deterrence Technologies — strategic delivery platform modernization, NC3 systems, and fuzing/guidance for deterrence.

2. Space Domain Technologies

•     Space Access and Orbital Systems — launch vehicles, space propulsion, and maneuvering systems for reliable access to space.

•     Spacecraft and Satellite Technologies — satellite bus design, payloads, communications, and on-orbit servicing.

•     Space Power and Propulsion — solar arrays, energy storage, and electric propulsion for satellite life and maneuverability.

•     On-Orbit Operations and Autonomy — autonomous spacecraft operations, rendezvous and proximity operations, and debris mitigation.

•     Space Domain Awareness — sensors and analytics to detect, track, and characterize space objects and threats.

•     Resilient and Survivable Space Architecture — distributed constellations and hardened systems for contested environments.

•     Space Environment and Effects — space weather and radiation effects mitigation for space assets.

•     Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) From and For Space — space-based positioning, navigation, and timing systems.

•     Satellite Assembly, Integration & Testing — processes and facilities for spacecraft integration and environmental test/verification.

3. Cyberspace / Electronic Warfare Domain Technologies

•     Cyber Operations and Cybersecurity — offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, threat intelligence, and incident response.

•     Communications and Networks — software-defined radios, dynamic spectrum management, and resilient tactical networks.

•     Electronic Warfare and Spectrum Operations — electromagnetic spectrum dominance: signal processing, electronic attack and protection.

•     Quantum Technologies — quantum computing, communication, and sensing; algorithms for intractable problems.

•     Electro-Optical and Infrared Sensors — imaging and sensing across visible, infrared, and ultraviolet spectra for detection and tracking.

•     Radar and Radio Frequency Sensors — AESA, synthetic aperture radar, and low-probability-of-intercept/detection radar for target tracking.

•     Multispectral and Hyperspectral Sensing — multi-band sensors for material discrimination and camouflage detection.

•     Signal Processing and Sensor Fusion — multi-sensor integration for target recognition and situational awareness.

•     Quantum Sensing and Advanced Properties — photonic and quantum devices for sensitivity, resolution, and miniaturization.

•     Directed Energy Sensing and Countermeasures — sensors detecting and characterizing directed-energy threats.

•     High-Energy Laser Systems — scalable high-power lasers (solid-state, fiber) and beam control for weaponization.

•     Photonics — light-based capabilities for sensing, quantum information science, and directed energy.

•     High-Power Electromagnetic Technologies — high-power microwave sources, pulse power, and antennas for non-kinetic disable/disrupt effects.

•     High Power Electromagnetic Effects — physics-level and system-level testing of high-power microwave and particle-beam effects.

•     High Power Electromagnetic Applications — end-to-end high-power electromagnetic system design, build, integration, and field testing.

•     Beam Control and Adaptive Optics — beam steering and atmospheric compensation for laser accuracy.

•     Directed Energy Effects and Countermeasures — physical and operational effects of directed-energy weapons and defensive countermeasures.

•     Cybersecurity for Digital Environments — threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and resilient digital architectures.

•     Navigation Warfare and Counter PNT — disrupting adversary PNT and protecting friendly PNT in GPS-denied environments.

4. Cross-Domain Technologies

•     Human Systems Integration — human factors engineering, user interface design, and cognitive support for system usability.

•     Human-Machine Teaming and Interfaces — improving interaction between humans and AI-enabled systems.

•     Training and Simulation Technologies — virtual reality, augmented reality, serious gaming, and adaptive learning for readiness and mission rehearsal.

•     Rapid Multi-Domain Integration — interoperable, networked systems combining air, space, cyber, EW, and ground capabilities.

•     Advanced Systems Engineering — requirements engineering, architecture, modeling and simulation, and verification/validation.

•     Integrated Vehicle Health Management — real-time platform monitoring and diagnostics for safety and readiness.

•     Power and Thermal Management — power generation, storage, distribution, and thermal dissipation technologies.

•     Advanced Materials Development — high-temperature ceramics, lightweight composites, metamaterials, and bio-inspired materials.

•     Additive Manufacturing — on-demand production of complex geometries and multi-material components.

•     Materials Processing and Fabrication — nanomanufacturing, advanced joining, surface engineering, and coatings.

•     Materials Characterization and Testing — experimental and computational methods to understand material performance.

•     Environmentally Responsive and Smart Materials — adaptive, sensing, and self-healing materials.

•     Microelectronics — micro-scale electronics and integrated circuits for defense and aerospace systems.

•     Model-Based Systems Engineering, Digital Engineering, and Digital Thread — digital twins and virtual prototypes across the system lifecycle.

•     Advanced Simulation and Virtual Prototyping — computer-aided engineering simulation and testing before physical creation.

•     Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence — machine learning and AI for predictive analytics, pattern recognition, and automated reasoning.

•     Additive Manufacturing Digital Integration — generative design, topology optimization, and in-situ additive manufacturing process monitoring.

•     Low C-SWAP Alternative PNT for Attritable Systems — affordable, expendable PNT for disposable unmanned aircraft in GPS-denied environments.

•     Modular Open Architecture for Resilient PNT — standardized-interface PNT systems enabling rapid upgrades.

•     Robotics Technologies — autonomous and semi-autonomous robots for logistics, maintenance, and hazardous-environment tasks.

•     Software Systems Development — DevSecOps, modular open architecture, and AI/ML/autonomy software.

•     Physiological Operations — systems exploiting human cognition to influence adversary decision-making.

•     Runtime Assurance (RTA) for AI — real-time safety monitoring that reverts AI systems to a trusted backup controller.

•     Autonomy (for Airborne Platforms) — uncrewed aerial systems that navigate and execute missions with minimal human input.

5. Basic Research Technologies (AFOSR-Aligned)

•     Energetic Solid-State Physics and Mechanochemistry — chemistry and physics of solid-state energetic materials under extreme conditions.

•     Energy, Combustion, and Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics — chemical energy conversion for propulsion, electricity, and directed energy.

•     Aerodynamic Sciences — fundamental flowfield physics across internal and external configurations.

•     High-Speed Aerodynamics — high-speed, high-temperature non-equilibrium flow physics.

•     Aerospace Composite Materials — chemistry, physics, and mechanics of novel composite materials.

•     Aerospace Structures — emerging structural materials, meta-architectures, and intelligent subsystems.

•     Propulsion and Power — fundamental discovery to enable enhanced maneuver and power capabilities.

•     Agile Science for Test and Evaluation (T&E) — metrology and test methods across autonomy, hypersonics, and cyber/microelectronics.

•     Computational Cognition and Machine Intelligence — mathematical and computational foundations of machine intelligence and human-machine alignment.

•     Computational Mathematics — algorithms for large-scale engineering, design, and predictive simulation.

•     Dynamical Systems and Control Theory — mathematics of analysis and control for complex dynamical systems.

•     Dynamic Data and Information Processing — real-time model refinement using measured or simulated data.

•     Information Assurance and Cybersecurity — securing distributed systems, nanoscale devices, and quantum information.

•     Mathematical Optimization — theory and algorithms for allocation, planning, logistics, and scheduling problems.

•     Science of Information, Computation, Learning, and Fusion — extracting information from large, heterogeneous, multi-modal data.

•     Trust and Influence — social and cognitive principles of trust between humans and intelligent agents.

•     Complex Networks — structural analysis of large, dynamic, interdependent network systems.

•     Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience — neural mechanisms of perception, cognition, and behavior; brain-inspired computing.

•     Atomic and Molecular Physics — cold and ultra-cold quantum gases, precision measurement, and matter-wave optics.

•     Electromagnetics — linear and nonlinear electromagnetics and signal processing.

•     Optoelectronics and Photonics — light-matter interaction at the nanoscale for communications and computation.

•     High-Energy Radiation-Matter Systems — interaction of electromagnetic energy and matter for directed-energy weapons and sensors.

•     Quantum Information Sciences — non-classical phenomena for information analysis, storage, and protection.

•     Physics of Sensing — fundamental physics of remote detection and object characterization.

•     Space Physics — solar-terrestrial environment effects on tracking, communications, and navigation.

•     Ultrashort Pulse Laser-Matter Interactions — physical phenomena from ultrashort-pulse laser interactions with matter.

•     Condensed Matter Physics — new quantum phases and macroscopic properties in solid-state materials.

•     Astrodynamics — physics of motion and control of natural and artificial objects in Earth/Moon/Sun gravity fields.

Which AFRL Directorate Owns Which Domain

Every Area of Interest is mapped to one or more AFRL Mission Organizations in Attachment 1 — this determines who within AFRL actually reviews your submission. At a domain level:

•     Air Warfare (AFRL/RA): concentrated in Air Domain Technologies, plus select Cross-Domain and Basic Research areas

•     Foundational Technologies / AFOSR (AFRL/RE): the dominant directorate across nearly all of Basic Research Technologies, plus broad Cross-Domain coverage

•     Information & Spectrum Warfare (AFRL/RF): heavy coverage across Air, Space, and especially Cyberspace/Electronic Warfare Domain Technologies

•     Space Warfare (AFRL/RJ): broad coverage across Air, Space, Cyber/EW, Cross-Domain, and Basic Research

•     Digital Capabilities (AFRL/IZ): narrower, concentrated in select Cyber/EW and Cross-Domain digital topics

•     711th Human Performance Wing (711HPW): Air Domain human performance and medicine topics, plus human-machine teaming and physiological operations

•     Technology Transition (AFRL/RR) and Systems Technology Office (AFRL/STO): not mapped to specific Areas of Interest in the alignment table; these function as cross-cutting/transition support rather than topic owners

Because a single Area of Interest can map to multiple directorates, and because the specific Spiral, not the Enterprise CSO, determines which directorate actually evaluates your submission, confirming the right directorate fit before drafting is worth doing early. This is exactly the kind of fit assessment BW&CO does at kickoff.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify award amounts — funding is set at the individual Spiral level and depends on availability. Awards may be structured as FAR Part 12 fixed-price contracts or as Other Transactions for Prototype (OTP) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022, including follow-on production agreements. Based on comparable DoD CSO/OTP mechanisms, awards have ranged from roughly $100,000 for early feasibility or component-level efforts up to $10 million or more for larger prototype and production-representative demonstrations. The Government may incrementally fund any award and reserves the right to fund all, some, or none of a proposal, including funding only part of a submission it deems Selectable.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding supports "innovative" solutions as legally defined: technology, processes, or methods (or new applications of existing ones) that are new as of your proposal's submission date. This spans advanced component development through full operational systems development, and can include prototype projects under OTP authority. A narrower category, Studies and Analysis funded with Operations and Maintenance appropriations, covers short-term (generally one year or less), non-developmental investigative work addressing urgent, near-term Air Force and Space Force needs.

What is the actual timeline to apply?

There is no single application deadline. You apply by responding to an individual Spiral, and each Spiral sets its own timeline. Open Spirals accept submissions on a rolling basis; Closed Spirals set a hard deadline, after which late submissions are handled under FAR 52.212-1(c) and generally not considered for award. The Enterprise CSO itself remains active indefinitely, refreshed annually until terminated, with new Spirals issued at any time. As of mid-2026, an active Centralized, Open Two-Step Spiral (FA8652-26-S-C005) covering the Foundational Technologies mission organization is open through April 30, 2027 — verify current status and scope on SAM.gov.

Who is eligible to apply?

U.S. commercial companies, small businesses, nontraditional defense contractors, and nonprofit research institutions registered in SAM.gov and determined "responsible" under FAR Subpart 9.1 are eligible. For awards structured as OTPs specifically, at least one of the following must also be true: a nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participates significantly; all significant non-government participants are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors; at least one-third of total project cost comes from non-federal sources; or the agency's Senior Procurement Executive documents exceptional circumstances justifying the transaction.

Who is NOT eligible to apply?

Foreign persons and foreign-owned, controlled, or influenced (FOCI) entities are prohibited from participating in awards under this announcement — full stop, with no stated exception. This is a meaningfully harder line than many other DoD CSOs, including some Army CSOs, which permit foreign-owned businesses to compete subject to review and approval. Companies should also expect exclusion if suspended or debarred from federal contracting, prohibited by law from receiving federal awards, or unable to meet required security clearances for a given effort.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Companies with technology that's genuinely new as of the proposal date, not incremental refinement of an existing government-known capability, and that map cleanly to a specific, currently-open Spiral's Areas of Interest are best positioned. CSB submissions are weighed equally on Technical Merit/Applicability and Funding Availability; CSP submissions add Importance to Agency Programs and Price to that mix, still weighted equally. Because the Government can categorize a submission "Selectable" yet unfundable, technical merit alone doesn't guarantee an award — timing against available budget matters just as much.

How competitive will this be?

The solicitation doesn't disclose award volume or success rates, and competitiveness will vary enormously by Spiral and Area of Interest. With roughly 94 Areas of Interest spanning basic research through operational systems, and eight separate mission organizations issuing their own Spirals independently, this functions less like a single competition and more like dozens of parallel, narrower competitions, each with its own funding pool and evaluation timeline.

What restrictions should I know about?

Key constraints beyond eligibility: submissions containing Controlled Unclassified Information must go through DoD SAFE, not standard email; awards involving military-critical technical data may require a certified DD Form 2345 and Defense Logistics Agency registration under ITAR/EAR; awarded efforts are subject to NIST SP 800-171 safeguarding requirements for Covered Defense Information; and non-government advisors (FFRDCs, SETA, and A&AS contractors) under signed NDAs may review your proposal on the Government's behalf.

How long will it take to prepare an application?

Preparation time isn't specified and depends on the Spiral, but the barrier to entry is intentionally low for Step 1. A Two-Step CSB is a PowerPoint briefing plus a white paper (or a Pitch, if the Spiral requires one), not a full proposal. Only companies invited to Step 2, or those responding to a One-Step Spiral, need to prepare a complete Commercial Solutions Proposal with a technical volume, price volume, and Statement of Work.

How BW&CO Can Help

The AFRL Enterprise CSO's structure — an indefinite umbrella document with dozens of independently-issued Spirals across eight mission organizations — makes "which opportunity should I actually respond to" a harder question than it looks. BW&CO helps companies:

•     Fit assessment — Identify which currently-open Spiral, and which of the roughly 94 Areas of Interest, fits your technology

•     Mechanism strategy — Determine whether your submission is better positioned as a FAR Part 12 contract or an OTP, and confirm OTP eligibility criteria are met

•     Proposal development — Draft compelling Commercial Solutions Briefs and Proposals within the required page and slide limits

•     Compliance — Navigate NIST SP 800-171, export control, and Science and Technology Protection review requirements before they become a late-stage surprise

•     Monitoring — Track SAM.gov for new and amended Spirals aligned to your capabilities

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here: SAM.gov — FA8652-26-S-C003

United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Army DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) is an ongoing solicitation designed to help the Army rapidly identify and acquire innovative commercial technologies that support the modernization of military ground vehicle capabilities. Unlike a traditional grant or procurement with a single application deadline, this CSO contains multiple Areas of Interest (AoIs) covering a wide range of technologies including robotics, artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, cybersecurity, advanced manufacturing, power systems, vehicle survivability, software engineering, modeling and simulation, and next-generation vehicle electronics.

Most Areas of Interest accept solution briefs on a rolling basis while the CSO remains open. However, individual AoIs may establish their own submission deadlines, which take precedence over the general solicitation timeline. Companies should carefully review the specific AoI before preparing a submission.

Unlike many Department of Defense opportunities that seek early-stage research, this CSO emphasizes innovative commercial technologies that can be demonstrated, adapted, integrated, or rapidly transitioned into Army applications through commercial contracts, Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs), Cooperative Agreements, or other acquisition mechanisms. Awards may support commercially available products, prototype demonstrations, pilot programs, technology maturation, and other activities that improve Army ground vehicle capabilities.

Companies may submit solution briefs for any open Area of Interest. The Government may evaluate submissions through a multi-phase process consisting of a written Solution Brief, an optional presentation or demonstration, and an invitation to submit a Commercial Solution Proposal (CSP). The Government also reserves the right to skip phases or move directly to a proposal request when appropriate.

Because new Areas of Interest may be added throughout the life of the solicitation and existing topics may be amended, companies with dual-use technologies should periodically monitor the CSO for new opportunities that align with their capabilities.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify award amounts, funding ranges, or the number of anticipated awards. Most awards coming from these CSOs range from the $500,000 to $5 million range.

Award values will depend on the individual Area of Interest, available funding, and the proposed commercial solution. The Government states that Requests for Commercial Solution Proposals (CSPs) are subject to the availability of funds, and that no specific dollars have been reserved for awards under the CSO.

Areas of Interest:

The following technology areas are currently included within the DEVCOM GVSC Commercial Solutions Opening. Unless otherwise stated within an individual Area of Interest, solution briefs may be submitted while the CSO remains open. Certain topics include separate submission deadlines, which take precedence over the general solicitation timeline.

GROUND VEHICLE ADVANCED POWER SYSTEMS:

This effort focuses on advancing electrical power systems up to 1.5MW of power for use on Military ground vehicles. The goal of this campaign is to meet the Army’s increasing electrical power needs while improving vehicle efficiency and the power density of power electronics. This will be made possible by exploiting the gains made in emerging power electronic designs and the use of cutting-edge electrical components. These advances will significantly impact future Army vehicle design and will enable the Army to have a decisive overmatch to near peer adversaries.

a. Power System Architecture up to 1.5MW: The objective of power system architecture topic develop architectures that are suitable for delivery of up to 1.5MW of power to vehicle systems and mission payloads. These architectures need to account for hybrid electric or all electric powertrains, high energy loads like cooling system, energy weapons, power export, and legacy 28Vdc/600Vdc power systems. There are three (3) key areas of investigation for this effort: 1) what safety features are needed to make the architecture a viable product; 2) is a voltage greater than 600Vdc needed; and 3) are electric components available at these voltage/power levels.

b. Advance Power Electronic Design: This topic focuses on taking advantage of cutting-edge power electronic design to significantly increase power density and power efficiency which will result in smaller devices that require less cooling and are easier to package. This topic includes, but is not limited to, advanced designs such as wideband gap semiconductors, soft switch, zero-volt switching, zero-current switch, modular multi-level converter, active filtering, and all other techniques to meet the focus of increased power density and power efficiency.

c. Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning (AI/ML) in Power Management Systems: This topic focuses on advancement in power management systems for ground vehicles as power management will enable more efficient vehicles. This topic incorporates advancements in AI/ML algorithms and knowledge base to adapt to how the vehicle is being used and learn the most efficient way to operate the vehicle. This topic also has two (2) key enablers in advancing AI/ML power system development: 1) power system modeling; and 2) hardware in-the loop software development.

d. Wireless Power Transfer: This topic focuses on wireless power transfer up to 1MW of power as there are two (2) target areas for wireless power transfer on Army ground vehicles. The first focus area is a safe, reliable way to recharge the vehicles through wireless recharge stations. The second focus area is wireless power transfer to transfer power between a hull and turret, bypassing the slipring.

e. Power System Physical Interfaces: Often when developing advance power electronics, the height and width of the design is dictated by the physical interface components, such as connectors, coolant fitting, and cabling. This topic focuses on the necessary advancement of interface components to reduce the physical size of the design. Also, these physical interface components often have very long lead times which can be problematic for procurement and integration, so advanced manufacturing approaches to reduce component lead time will also be explored under this topic.

f. Ground Vehicle MIL-Rugged Computing Architectures for Artificial Intelligence Applications: The US Army is interested in ruggedized computing architectures designed for running AI applications on military ground vehicles. In order to be considered rugged, the computers would need to meet ATPD-2404 requirements such as operating through pressure washing, submergence in 1 meter of water, gun shock, and operating in a 71C environment with little to no airflow. AI applications for mobility, autonomy, or target recognition largely depend on GPU or GPU-like processing ability with quick access to large amounts of memory. Utilizing MIL-STD-1275F or MIL-STD-3072 electrical power input, what products are available or could be developed to provide the most processing capability in a Standardized A-Kit Vehicle Envelope (SAVE) space claim or smaller and still meet the required environmental conditions?

g. Advanced Power Production and Storage: The US Army is interested in advanced power production and storage technologies, including novel batteries and fuel cells. Objectives include those that provide improved durability, reduced costs, and increased energy density, making them an attractive option for military vehicle applications. These technologies also include the ancillary enabling technologies, such as production of hydrogen for hydrogen fuel cells. These may come from industries such as automotive, aerospace, and energy.

h. Prototype Vehicle Experimentation Technical Support. The US Army is seeking technical support for high voltage vehicles during soldier touchpoint and demonstration events. Objectives include CONUS and OCONUS field repair and component replacement for the high voltage vehicles and are required to include the following: provide safety and driver training to select Government and military personnel; provide onsite technical/repair support (as needed) during vehicle events; order and field receipt of repair parts and supplies; diagnose, develop and execute plans for field maintenance and repair; arrange vehicle transportation to and from experimentation sites or for major repairs or regular maintenance; conduct major repairs and regular maintenance (as required); provide reach back technical and engineering support (as required). Working knowledge of the specific vehicle is required.

GROUND VEHICLE ROBOTICS (GVR):

The GVR mission is to develop, experiment, demonstrate, test and transition autonomy enabled ground system capabilities and technologies to meet and shape Army requirements.

The U.S. Army DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) seeks innovative commercial solutions that advance Autonomous Multidomain Robotic Systems. As the Army accelerates modernization toward multi-domain operations (MDO), the integration of heterogeneous robotic and autonomous systems (RAS) operating cohesively across ground, air, and sea domains represents a critical capability gap and strategic priority. GVSC, in support of CPE Mission Autonomy's future efforts, is interested in technologies and approaches that enable unmanned systems to function as a unified, intelligent combat team to execute complex missions with minimal human intervention while preserving human decision authority where necessary.

a. Agile Development of Logistics Material and Technical Services. To rapidly demonstrate and test GVR vehicle autonomy system innovative commercially available solutions for logistics material development that leverage existing autonomy systems, documentation, software and displays. Reducing cost and delivery time is required across the full spectrum of logistics material development. Application of Agile Development Process for maintenance, operation, supply, training materials and services is desired. Leveraging innovative commercial technologies, capabilities, processes, and techniques along with demonstrating the benefits of continuous integration and delivery during the development of operator and maintainer training, technical manuals, publications, and field support is desired. Additionally, the Government seeks alternative methods of delivering the materials to the soldier and collecting feedback and validating the new methods as well as supporting the transition of the new processes to programs of record is desired.

b. Cybersecurity. Commercial software and hardware to address cyber threats, which are a threat in the battlespace. Of particular interest is commercial software that enables the Army and its ground vehicle fleet to adapt to this environment with advancing cybersecurity technologies to become resilient to such threats. This includes applications of AI and quantum decryption as part of cyber security.

c. C-UAS. Commercial technology to counter the threat of drone-based attacks on ground vehicles and their sustainment and command and control support systems. Counter UAS capabilities of particular interest include one or more of the following technologies:

1) Sensing, such as radar, lidar, acoustic detectors, and optical sensors, which can detect, identify, classify, and track drones in real-time.

2) Hostable Portable software suitable for Fire Control, Blue Force deconfliction, Threat Point Of Origin (POO) and Track Triangulation, Sensor Fusion, Protection Projection, threat intent classification, payload identification, and weapon system handoff ( on and off platform), crew notification and interaction

3) Effectors to include but not limited to Kinetic Hard Kill (to include purely kinetic, fragmentation, and blast warheads), Electronic Warfare, Directed Energy, High Power Microwave, Electro Magnetic Pulse, Laser Dazzlers, and permanent sensor induced damage / degradation.

4) The ability to host complimentary capabilities within the Modular APS Controller (MAC) level and Modular APS Framework (MAF).

Seeking whitepapers that clearly identify a near term pathway to capabilities that can be demonstrated via experimental soldier touchpoints within 6-12 months and subsequent expedited fielding via PdM VPS or equivalent.

e. Textile Based Camouflage System. Commercial textile-based technology that will reduce the probability of a vehicle being detected by sensors and detectors whether the vehicle is stationary or on the move. Of particular interest are commercial solutions that allow adequate air flow to prevent damage to the textile-based technology, and that do not impede driver vision.

f. Thermal and HD Pan Tilt Zoom (PTZ) Camera. Commercial technology that provides day / night, real-time surveillance, 24/7 observation through degraded environments that allows for response to threats. Of particular interest is commercial solutions that allow for 360 degree visibility and allow for rapid integration onto multiple platforms.

g. Multi-Payload Launcher. This topic focuses on a system that can rapidly deploy multiple drones/payloads, either simultaneously or in quick succession, with each drone/payload potentially equipped to perform a distinct task. This creates a coordinated, multi-faceted capability that can be managed by a single operator or an autonomous control system.

The key to the system's versatility lies in its ability to launch a variety of drones/payloads, each tailored for a specific function. This "flexible loadout" can include:

1. Loitering Munitions: Designed for precision strikes against targets, with some variants capable of defeating armored vehicles.

2. Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR): Designed to provide real-time video, intelligence, and situational awareness for ground troops.

3. Electronic Warfare (EW): Designed to jam enemy communications or spoof their navigation systems.

4. Counter-Drone Systems: Designed to intercept and neutralize hostile drones.

h. Autonomous Commercial Vehicle (ACV). This topic focuses on the ACV capability which is a transformational unmanned ground platform designed to redefine maneuver warfare. Equipped with Modular Mission Payloads (MMPs), it provides Army units flexible options for reconnaissance, security, direct action, fires support, logistics, and deception. Leveraging mass-produced vehicle technologies, the ACV reduces cost, maintenance, and complexity while delivering lethal and non-lethal effects at the commander’s discretion.

Built for fast, distributed operating environments, the ACV enhances survivability and lethality through scalable production and vendor supply chains. It expands battlefield geometry, enabling commanders to shape engagements by employing Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) for time, space, and cross-domain maneuver advantage. At the point of need, it delivers advanced battlefield capabilities.

i. Aided Detection Target Recognition (AiDTR) System. This topic focuses on a sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) that employs machine learning to autonomously identify and categorize threats from sensor data, such as enemy combatants or vehicles. The primary goal of AiDTR is to reduce the cognitive burden on soldiers while increasing probability of threat detection and lowering false alarm rates, enabling faster threat identification and superior situational awareness. It is engineered for seamless integration with vehicles and advanced sensor systems.

j. Modular Obscuration System. This topic focus is seeking a mature, production-ready technology for a modular obscuration system. The desired system will provide a non-lethal effect to degrade enemy reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition (RSTA) capabilities and defeat visually and infrared-guided weapon systems. The primary objective is to hamper battlespace visibility, thereby increasing warfighter and platform survivability. Desired specifications include:

1. Obscure wavelengths from the visual through the near-infrared (NIR) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

2. Generation of a visually impermeable screening effect in less than two minutes.

3. The obscuration effect should be sustained for more than 12 minutes from a single dissemination.

4. Man-portable and capable of being operated by a single soldier.

5. Support both dismounted and mounted operations.

6. Offers flexible control options: remotely via a wireless signal or directly through a wired connection.

k. Mission Autonomy Common Control Architecture Strategies, Prototypes & Solutions. Program Manager Robotic Command and Integration (PM RCI) seeks innovative commercial solutions and professional services to provide rapid, on demand technical expertise that accelerates Mission Autonomy (MA) development through advanced architecture maturation, mission engineering, modeling and simulation, cybersecurity analysis, and rapid acquisition and technical prototyping. Desired specialties also include multidisciplinary engineering and human factor analysis of MA systems and operations. Required capabilities include evolving the Mission Autonomy Common Control Architecture (MACCA); producing mission level modeling and architectural artifacts; conducting multidisciplinary engineering analysis; evaluation and verification (virtual and physical); system prototyping and integration; and delivering autonomy focused cybersecurity products such as threat models, attack surface assessments, survivability requirements, and adversarial testing strategies. PM RCI also requires commercial partners capable of shaping and executing sound acquisition strategies that shorten procurement timelines, drive faster prototype delivery, and apply innovative contracting methods aligned with DoW’s Acquisition Transformation Strategy to promote rapid, iterative development. Solutions should enable rapid task activation, scalable team deployment, and streamlined deliverables, while integrating commercial best practices that accelerate fielding and expand PM RCI’s ability to assess, secure, and integrate autonomous system technologies. This includes command and control, autonomy architecture, and tactical networking capabilities essential for synchronized air and ground robotic operations across Army missions.

l. Unified Command and Common Control (UC3) for Multi-Entity Mission Autonomy (MEMA) for Robotic Operations. The U.S. Army’s Capability Program Executive for Mission Autonomy (CPE MA), through PM RCI, seeks innovative solutions that advance architectures and technologies for Multi Entity Mission Autonomy (MEMA). The goal is to accelerate integration of autonomous capabilities across ground, air, maritime/surface, subsurface systems, payloads, and sensors. PM RCI requires scalable, modular hardware and software to support a Unified Command and Common Control (UC3) framework enabling and integrating coordinated operations among diverse autonomous systems. Solutions must provide safety assured control for crewed and uncrewed platforms operating in remote, supervised, or fully autonomous modes. Capabilities should reduce operator burden, enable one to many control, and adapt to varying supervision levels through independently verifiable, safety critical autonomy. Solutions should also address current UxS limitations, such as high operator to platform ratios, fragmented interfaces, stovepiped data, and challenges in Denied, Degraded, Intermittent, and Limited (DDIL) environments. PM RCI seeks prototype or mature product demonstrations of robust, interoperable UC3 frameworks using a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA). Desired elements include a mission level C2 Orchestrator and platform level Mission Autonomy Agents that enhance distributed processing, resilience in contested environments, and seamless data orchestration across tactical networks. Solutions should support development of Mission Autonomy Common Control Architecture (MACCA) to ensure interoperability across Army, Joint, and allied autonomous systems.

m. Unified Combat Teaming. GVSC is seeking the connective architecture, control, and integration capability that turns a diverse, multi-vendor mix of unmanned ground, air, and sea systems into a single, scalable, controllable combat team, not a proprietary autonomy stack or isolated platform. We invite architecture-led and tooling-led innovators to address one or more of six interlocking Technical Workstreams (TW#) and/or Enabling Workstream (EW#) areas: open, severable modular architectures that let one vendor's system be cleanly swapped for another's [EW1]; common control and data standards (e.g., JAUS, DDS, TAK, STANAG) proven by dissimilar systems sharing one operational picture in Electronic Warfare/GPS-contested conditions [EW2]; onboarding tooling and SDKs that make third-party integration repeatable, not bespoke [EW3]; dynamic, decentralized task allocation and mission planning that lets one Soldier direct a multi-vendor formation as one team [TW1]; human-machine teaming that grows the agents one Soldier commands without growing the workload [TW2]; and the experimentation and evaluation harness to measure, replay, and compare teaming across simulation and hardware [TW3].

We value capability that is demonstrated, not asserted, works with platforms you did not build, carries a clear MOSA underpinning, and proves itself through physical experimentation, with a credible simulation path to scale preferred over a large fleet. We invite you to propose your open, interoperable technology that can show real results on a few systems today and a defensible path to large multi-vendor formations tomorrow, evaluable in a Hardware In the Loop or live settings within 6 to 12 months of award, whether addressing a single area or spanning several.

Please see attachment, “Area of Interest - Unified Combat Teaming” for all additional information regarding this AoI.

Solution briefs may address one or more of the six workstreams described in the attachment. Multi-workstream and integrated system proposals spanning the full Unified Combat Teaming capability are strongly encouraged.

While this Area of Interest will remain open, the Army will make initial award(s) based on White Papers submitted by 01 August 2026.

FORCE PROJECTION TECHNOLOGY (FPT):

The FPT provides mission lifecycle engineering for Army Combat Support and Combat Service Support equipment for gap crossing, petroleum & water systems, combat engineering, material handling, and fluid and petroleum quality surveillance. Its laboratories facilitate research, development, and engineering services to support fuels, fluids, water, wastewater and military bridging systems to keep the US Army in motion anytime, anywhere.

a. Demand Reduction

i. Alternative Sources of Water / Atmospheric Water Extraction (AWE). The Army has gaps in the ability to supply potable water to distributed, semi-independent units conducting multi-domain operations in a contested logistics environment. Currently, Large Tactical Water Purification Units that must be stationary during operation are used to produce bulk drinking water, which is then stored, bottled, and distributed tethering units to long lines of resupply.

b. Predictive Logistics and Maintenance. GVSC is interested in commercial software and integrated hardware solutions that provide the Army, and joint and multinational partners where possible, with improved sustainment posture through improved precision and accuracy in sustainment operations, such as maintenance and equipment status, and tracking of classes of supply, such as major end items, fuel, water, and spare parts. Specific interests in this area follow.

i. Logistics Tracking and Planning. GVSC is pursuing improved tracking of classes of supply, to include through multinational partners and channels. The purpose is to provide improved status reports to facilitate rapid, accurate decision making. Ideal solutions will provide not only Army visibility, but compatibility or integration into joint and multinational partners. While envisioned as software, integrated software-hardware solutions will be considered. Training, modelling, and simulation software to facilitate improved understanding, tracking, and decision making may be applicable here as well. In general, ideal proposals will include or culminate in successful demonstrations and pilot implementations that show paths to transition.

ii. Smart Fuel Metering and Management. Provide near real-time understanding of fuel status, fuel (supply) availability/quantity, location, and supply actions. The objective is to extend the operational reach and readiness of the Warfighter by providing fuel awareness and fuel management decision support for commanders in Multi Domain Operations throughout the range of military operations.

Commercial sensors, software, or integrated hardware-software solutions to support this project will support the ability to collect fuel measurement data from collapsible bags at fuel points during field experiments with the Army and United States Marine Corps (USMC) operations. Additionally, commercial solutions to assist in the development of a fuel management system to enable commodity managers to track and account for material as it is received, stored, transported, issued, and consumed delivering end-to-end visibility shared across the enterprise. Selection will be made on the basis of enabling the warfighter to improve decisions, manage multiple fuel sources, reduce demand, balance loads, and improve efficiencies within contingency bases, optimizing fuel management in expeditionary environments.

c. Advanced Manufacturing. New and novel technologies in the realm of advanced manufacturing technologies to include innovative technologies and processes to produce high-quality products with increased efficiency and reduced waste. This includes the integration of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the Internet of Things (IoT), to create smart factories that can adapt to changing production demands for supply of parts and services of interest to GVSC.

d. Autonomous Resupply. GVSC is interested in technologies that allow the Army to enhance multi domain distribution, extend reach, and increase the volume of supplies to dispersed formations through advanced platforms.

e. Advanced Power and Energy Solutions. GVSC is interested in technologies that allow the Army to field alternative energy solutions through advanced solutions such as fuel cells, advanced batteries, microgrids.

f. Bridging and Gap Defeat. Develop, test, experiment with, or demonstrate new innovative technology or mature existing technologies to defeat manmade or natural gaps found on the battlefield. Areas of interest include materiel solutions focused towards either wet or dry gaps and over a variety of defeat lengths, as well as the addition of AI/ML capabilities to new or existing materiel for both assault as well as logistical support missions. Efforts in this area support assured mobility in assault operations and the efficient execution of logistics in disbursed contested environments.

g. Fuel Handling Equipment. The Army is interested in advanced tactical fuel handling equipment. Areas of interest include but are not limited to fuel storage, distribution, filtration, and monitoring technologies and hardware. These efforts will increase fuel distribution capacity and tempo to extend operational reach, enable dispersion, and increase lethality as required for Joint All Domain Operations.

GROUND VEHICLE MATERIALS ENGINEERING (GVME)

The GVME mission is to provide materials technologies and engineering support to ground systems from cradle to grave to enhance warfighter readiness. GVME supports a diverse materials mission to include corrosion, coatings, joining, additive

manufacturing, and material and manufacturing applications, all supported by a characterization and failure analysis branch with in-house testing capabilities.

a. Ceramic Material Technologies. Ceramic materials for application in military parts to take advantage of properties such as exceptional hardness, wear resistance, corrosion resistance and applicability for high temperature environments. Areas of particular interest include applications for lightweighting, non- conductive, and non-magnetic applications.

b. Composites. Applications for composite materials that offer enhanced strength-to-weight ratios, improved corrosion resistance and increased durability compared to traditional materials. Of particular

interest are applications for composite rubbers for tracks and wheeled vehicle systems and applications of advanced composites for protective systems.

c. Composite and Transparent Armor. Commercial armor and advanced armor technologies to include transparent armor, reactive armors, and advanced material solutions for enhanced survivability for vehicles, payloads, and personnel.

d. Coatings. Coatings provide means of enhancing the properties of existing materials and components beyond what they are typically capable of. Advanced coating technologies, such as nanocoatings and thin- film coatings, offer improved properties, such as self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and anti-reflective characteristics. Coatings are also used to reduce friction, improve fuel efficiency, and minimize waste. Overall, coating technologies play a critical role in enhancing the performance, reliability, and lifespan of materials and components, while also reducing maintenance and operational costs.

e. Castings and Forging. GVSC is interested in advanced technologies which can support low volume, flexible, and responsive production of castings and forgings. This includes additive technologies, which enable substitution of the additive manufactured parts; incremental forming technologies; enabling technologies for rapid production of molds and dies; and computational tools to accelerate design and qualification of large castings and forgings with location-specific property prediction.

f. Tooling. GVSC is interested in advanced technologies which can support low volume, flexible, and responsive production of tooling. This includes technologies for rapid production of low volume tooling for composites, plastics, and other techniques suitable for low to medium volume production.

GROUND VEHICLE SURVIVABILITY AND PROTECTION:

Focuses on advancing vehicle and crew survivability for tracked and wheeled tactical and combat ground vehicles. The goal is to meet the Army’s increasing goal for higher mobility while maintaining or improving the survivability of the combat fleet. This will be made possible by exploiting increased computer power and implementation of AI in emerging active protection systems as well as innovative passive material solutions.

a. Next-Generation Vehicle Protection Systems Base Kit. Seeking innovative partners to deliver a critical technology for our next-generation vehicle protection strategy: the Vehicle Protection Systems Base Kit (VBK). This is a unique opportunity to contribute to a revolutionary, Modular Open Systems Architecture (MOSA)-based Active Protection System (APS) framework designed to dramatically enhance soldier survivability and reduce lifecycle costs.

The VBK: A Foundation for Adaptable Protection

The VBK program is focused on creating a flexible, scalable, and rapidly adaptable APS framework – instantiated by the VBK Controller – that can be seamlessly integrated with a wide range of APS subsystems across diverse missions and platforms. We are partnering with industry leaders to build the core components of this framework, including the Modular Active Controller (MAC), Safety Control Interface Panel (SCIP)/User Interface Control Panel (UICP) and the optional Power Management Distribution System (PMDS).

Seeking a partner to build and deliver production-intent VBK prototypes based on Government-provided Technical Data Packages (TDPs).

The MAC, the main component of the VBK control system, is a high-performance 3U VPX chassis featuring:

• SOSA-Compliant Architecture: Ensuring interoperability and future-proofing.

• Powerful Compute Capabilities: Supporting advanced algorithms with multiple compute-intensive payload slots (3-5) and options for Intel Xeon or NVIDIA Jetson AGX (Orin or Thor) based processing.

• Versatile I/O Connectivity: A cutting-edge FPGA I/O card enabling high-speed data transfer via 1/10 Gigabit TSN Ethernet, RS-422, CAN, SDI, DisplayPort, HDMI, and a comprehensive range of discrete signals.

Deliverables & Impact:

Seeking delivery of fully functional, production-ready VBK prototypes, including individual Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) based on the Government-provided Technical Data Packages (TDPs) for the MAC, SCIP, UICIP and PMDS plus all necessary support components (cables, breakout connectors, special tools, mounting hardware).

By responding to this area of interest, you will:

• Shape the Future: Contribute to a groundbreaking system that will enable vehicle protection for years to come.

• Leverage Government Investment: Utilize provided TDPs to accelerate development and reduce risk.

• Become a Key Partner: Establish a strong relationship with the GVSC and the U.S. Army.

We invite qualified organizations with expertise in hardware development, firmware integration, and MOSA principles to submit proposals for delivery of 10 VBK prototypes, with a follow-on option to deliver additional kits.

See attachment 0001 and 0002

Suspense date for submittal under this AOI is 01/30/2026.

b. Signature Management Technologies. Seeking innovative commercial solutions to mitigate ground vehicle and marine vehicle signatures. The signatures being requested include thermal, acoustic, and radio frequency, but others will also be considered. The technologies may be applique or coatings.

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER (SEC):

SEC provides full software lifecycle management; to engineer, develop, integrate and field precise software solutions; to improve Current Force effectiveness; and to provide superior software capabilities for the Future Force.

a. Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS) Common Operating System. The Army seeks innovative support to advance its Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS) Operating System (OS) for ground vehicle platforms. This initiative aims to establish a common, government-owned software foundation to reduce costs associated with commercial licensing, maintenance, and complex systems integration. Leveraging a standardized GOTS OS promotes software reuse, enhances cybersecurity through a common security posture, and ensures long-term scalability and maintainability across the fleet. The goal is to accelerate fielding schedules and reduce duplicative engineering efforts by providing a pre-accredited, adaptable operating system architecture for all vehicle programs.

Closing date for submittal under this AoI is 05/15/2026.

b. Embedded Software Maintenance. SEC is focused on providing software maintenance and sustainment for multiple vehicle platforms including Bradley Fighting Vehicles. This includes specific software development, integration, testing, validation, and fielding. The goal is to understand and innovate software solutions to integrate emerging technology and capabilities as it relates to obsolescence issues with legacy vehicle systems and equipment.

• Focus will be on tactical code development with military approved software (VXWorks, GHS, AdaCore) and communication systems (MIL-STD-1553, RS232/RS422/RS485)

• Automated and hybrid testing methodologies include simulation conception, testing development linking requirements traceability, and lab hardware/vehicle platform test management.

• Innovative hardware solutions to support design and building testing platforms, experimental/prototype vehicle integration efforts, and support priority equipment needs for software testing and validation.

g. Software & Hardware Integration and Fielding Support for Ground Vehicle Platforms - Data Integration for Ground Systems (DIGS) & Digital Logbook (DLB). The Army seeks innovative support to advance the integration and sustainment of the DIGS Kit and DLB for ground vehicle platforms. This initiative aims to automate manual processes, enhance equipment readiness visibility, and improve sustainment operations by digitizing maintenance tasks, streamlining Preventative Maintenance Checks and Services (PMCS), and error-proofing parts ordering. DIGS leverages vehicle sensors to capture usage and fault data, enabling the generation of accurate 5988-E forms and supporting commanders in making informed decisions.

The DLB, installed on the Operator Support Device (OSD), ensures vehicle configuration management, provides access to specific technical manuals based on vehicle configurations, restricts NSN ordering errors, and maintains updated Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMs) via network architecture. DLB facilitates guided PMCS steps, fault recording, and requisition validation, seamlessly integrating with the Global Combat Support System - Army (GCSS-A) for fault and requisition communication. Additionally, DLB supports disconnected operations through QR code generation and network printing capabilities.

The SEC is focused on providing full software lifecycle management, including development, integration, testing, validation, and fielding of DIGS kits and DLB software. The goal is to innovate software solutions that integrate emerging technologies and address obsolescence issues in legacy vehicle systems and equipment, ensuring operational efficiency and readiness across multiple vehicle platforms.

h. Diagnostic Software (DS) for Vehicle Maintenance. The Army seeks innovative support to advance DS Viper, the latest generation of Army standard diagnostic software. DS Viper is designed to maintain Army Ground Combat Systems, Tactical Wheeled Vehicles, and Watercraft, providing a unified diagnostic solution to enhance maintenance operations across diverse platforms. DS Viper delivers decoupled diagnostics to support the Army’s transition to a single viewer, the Interactive Authoring and Display Software (IADS). As part of the Project Director Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (PD TMDE) Maintenance Support Device (MSD) system image, DS Viper ensures seamless integration, cybersecurity compliance, and eliminates licensing fees. The software simplifies training requirements by offering a standardized look and feel across platforms, reducing complexity and improving operational efficiency.

The SEC is focused on providing full software lifecycle management, including development, software sustainment/maintenance, integration, testing, and validation of the DS Viper software. The goal is to innovate software solutions that integrate emerging technologies and address obsolescence issues in legacy vehicle systems and equipment, ensuring operational efficiency and readiness across multiple vehicle platforms. This government-owned diagnostic solution underscores the Army’s commitment to delivering a cost-effective, scalable, and secure tool that enhances vehicle maintenance operations and supports readiness across the fleet.

i. Software Configuration Management (SCM). The SCM team is soliciting a user-friendly tool that can integrate with Source Management and code tools (Atlassian or GitLab) to track and manage final deliverables for all the projects we support. It needs to be able to establish what we expect to receive for each Release per Project and track if it was received, dates, from who, etc. with a hierarchy of deliverables and sub-components maintained. Store location information for both physical and electronic versions. Additionally, it needs to track physical and electronic receipt of information from external sources, who, what, where and their storage locations.

j. CI/CD Pipelines. The SEC is seeking an industry partner with GovCloud development experience to test and validate capabilities between our on-premise infrastructure and AWS cloud environment. Must have demonstrated experience in automation, responsible for developing Infrastructure as Code (IaC), with tools like Terraform or CloudFormation, and building CI/CD pipelines to ensure seamless building and integration of software source code and automated test. A strong background in AWS services, scripting (Python/Bash), and hybrid cloud security along with experience in the Army RMF process.

k. Artificial Intelligence in Software Engineering and Development. This topic focuses on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to assist software engineering professionals throughout the software development lifecycle—including requirements, architecture, design, implementation, and testing—to improve software quality and accelerate development.

Areas of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Code generation models trained specifically for embedded, military, or safety-critical software development environments.

-AI-assisted expansion of unit testing in legacy code bases, including automated test generation and identification of gaps in test coverage.

-AI-assisted modernization of legacy software systems, including migration from legacy or military-centric programming languages to modern or general-purpose programming languages.

-AI-assisted acceleration of model-based software engineering, including generation of Unified Modeling Language (UML)/Systems Modeling Language (SysML) models from legacy documentation and/or source code.

- AI-assisted analysis of software engineering artifacts, including gap analysis and evaluation of design documentation and UML/SysML models.

-AI-assisted comprehension of legacy code bases, including extraction of architecture, interfaces, and system behavior from existing source code.

-AI-assisted refactoring and restructuring of software systems to improve maintainability, modularity, and performance.

-AI-assisted generation and maintenance of software documentation, including design descriptions, interface documentation, and developer guidance.

-AI-assisted traceability analysis across requirements, models, source code, and test artifacts.

-AI-assisted detection of software defects, vulnerabilities, and violations of safety or security coding standards.

-AI-powered developer assistants integrated into software development environments to support code generation, debugging, and refactoring.

l. Simulated/Emulated Hardware Targets for Automated Testing and Digital Twins. Provide subject matter expertise on the development of simulated/emulated hardware targets for embedded systems that can be used for automated testing and digital twin applications. The intent is to gain visibility on the state-of-the-art tools and practices for abstracting from hardware, understand in what situations to use specific tools, and potentially develop a reference architecture (e.g., a sample robot or vehicle) that can be used to assess capabilities and grow competency on how to build integrated pipelines and automation.

m. Multi-Tenant Cloud Solutions for Embedded Software Development. Provide subject matter expert support to bring industry best practices into the architectural design, implementation, and maintenance of a multi-tenant based cloud solution for hosting software development and test projects, with a primary focus on embedded software. This effort seeks experts to assist the government team in deploying concepts within government-owned cloud environments (e.g., SPDS, GDEV-C). The solution should provide projects with scalable, isolated cloud resources by default and include the ability for the defense industrial base to use the environment. A key focus is on automation, the adoption of AI (including pipeline development), and DevSecOps practices in alignment with DoW modernization goals. Subject matter experts will work with the government team and could form the basis of a persistent operations team or, at a minimum, inform the government on how best to organize such a team and identify the skills/resources needed to support the effort operationally.

n. Adoption and Use of Containerization in Embedded Systems. Provide subject matter expert support to bring industry best practices into the adoption and use of containerization within software development and test activities, including those with an embedded system focus. This effort seeks to leverage expert knowledge to address current gaps in security and utilization, and to discover more effective ways to use containerization to its fullest potential. A specific focus is desired on the hardening of containers and the enabling infrastructure, along with general supply chain management considerations. This includes various levels of usage for containers, from deploying enterprise solutions versus VMs, looking at how to do builds/tests for things like CIE, the possible application on actual embedded targets, and the general use of containers for tools and builds in general pipelines.

o. Software Test Automation. The SEC is advancing an enterprise Software Test Automation capability to modernize verification and validation across Army ground vehicle platforms. This initiative integrates automated and hybrid testing methodologies into the full software lifecycle, enabling continuous regression, requirements traceability, and objective digital evidence generation. Leveraging reusable automation frameworks (CATS), centralized orchestration platforms (CTAP), and Software-in-the-Loop (SITL) and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HITL) environments, SEC reduces manual regression cycles, improves defect detection, and accelerates software fielding. The capability supports tactical code validation across approved military software environments and communication interfaces (e.g., MIL-STD-1553, CAN, serial protocols), while enhancing cybersecurity validation and sustainment readiness. The objective is to convert repetitive manual testing effort into scalable, reusable infrastructure that improves quality, lowers lifecycle cost, and supports rapid capability integration across current and future vehicle platforms.

p. Software Safety. The SEC provides comprehensive Software Safety engineering support across Army ground vehicle platforms to ensure safe, reliable, and mission-assured system operation. This capability includes support for Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA), Functional Hazard Analysis (FHA), system and software hazard tracking, enforcement of coding standards such as MISRA, and implementation of safety-critical test requirements including C/DC and MC/DC coverage. SEC conducts independent technical reviews of software design, code, and verification artifacts while maintaining bidirectional traceability from hazards through requirements, architecture, implementation, and test results. The objective is to reduce safety risk, ensure compliance with Army and DoD safety standards, and support safe integration of new capabilities into both legacy and future vehicle systems.

q. Digital Distribution. The SEC seeks innovative support to advance its Digital Distribution capability to modernize the delivery and sustainment of software for ground vehicle platforms. Digital Distribution provides a secure, centralized platform for the rapid deployment of software updates, patches, and new capabilities, eliminating the need for physical media. This approach ensures that all systems remain up-to-date with the latest approved software versions, reducing downtime and enhancing mission readiness. By leveraging encryption and authentication protocols, Digital Distribution protects against unauthorized access and tampering, ensuring the integrity of critical software. The objective is to streamline version control and ensures consistency across the fleet, enabling faster and more efficient software fielding.

r. Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). The SEC seeks to enhance its SBOM capability to improve transparency and security across the software lifecycle. SBOM provides a comprehensive inventory of all software components, libraries, and dependencies used in a system, enabling proactive management of vulnerabilities and compliance with government standards. By identifying and tracking software components, SBOM ensures rapid detection and mitigation of cybersecurity risks, reducing the potential for exploitation. It also facilitates lifecycle management by addressing obsolescence issues and ensuring long-term maintainability. This objective is to support the Army’s efforts to improve software quality, enhance cybersecurity, and ensure compliance with Executive Order 14028 on improving the nation’s cybersecurity.

s. Hardware Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) Simulation. The SEC seeks to advance its Hardware LRU Simulation capability to modernize its software development and testing processes. Hosted in the cloud, this simulation environment provides a scalable and cost-effective solution for testing and validating software without the need for physical hardware. Hardware LRU Simulation enables developers to replicate the behavior of hardware components and systems, allowing for early detection of defects and interoperability issues. This approach accelerates development timelines, reduces costs associated with hardware procurement and maintenance, and supports the integration of emerging technologies. The objective is to provide a virtual environment for testing and have Hardware LRU Simulations to ensures that software is thoroughly validated and ready for deployment, enhancing the reliability and performance of Army ground vehicle platforms.

GROUND VEHICLE POWER AND MOBILTIY (GVPM):

GVPM provides the Army with solutions in Ground Vehicle Mobility, Power, and Propulsion. GVPM has developed powertrains, power generation, power distribution and energy storage systems. GVPM facilities encompass labs in engine research, engine/electric machine testing and development, and vehicle performance testing under all climate conditions.

Priority is placed on near term solutions that have the potential for rapid transition to a high Technology Readiness Level (TRL). GVPM maintains interest in longer term technology that advances the performance or enables compact power generation and propulsion systems. In addition, GVPM has interest in emerging technologies for ground vehicle applications for high power, power dense generators, and advanced power electronics that have been integrated into demonstrations as part of a vehicle.

a. Durable Replacement Track System for M88A2 Vehicle. Seeking a drop-in replacement for the M88A2 vehicle existing track systems. The desired solution should require minimal changes to the vehicle, limited to components such as the sprocket and carrier. It is highly desirable to retain the current OEM roadwheels. The solution should leverage proven, commercially available technologies that balance performance and durability with affordability. The T107 track system is currently on the Readiness Driver List, which could inversely affect the vehicles’ availability. PM Mounted Armored Vehicles (MAV) seeks an optimized and modern track solution that can be integrated into the M88A2 platform with minimal modifications while providing better availability, durability and value for the Government.

Requirements

The replacement track system must meet the following preliminary requirements:

1) Compatibility: The track system must be compatible with the current M88A2 platform, requiring minimal modifications (e.g., sprocket and carrier changes). It is highly desirable to retain the current OEM roadwheels.

2) Durability: The track system must demonstrate significantly improved durability compared to the current system, with reduced failure rates while following current OMS/MP (20% Primary roads, 40% secondary and 40% Cross Country roads. 30% of each of these will be completed in “Towed” conditions).

a) Track Pads: 1,000 miles Threshold (T) 2,000 Objective (O)

b) Track Body: 2,000 miles Threshold (T) 3,000 Objective (O)

3) Size and Weight: The track system must conform to the size and weight constraints of the 70T M88A2 vehicle. There is not a specific requirement for a maximum allowed track weight, however track weight and its impact on vehicle performance and life-cycle cost could be used for rating purposes.

4) Performance: The track system must maintain or improve the vehicle's mobility, traction, and operational performance in diverse terrains. Improved tractive effort during towing operations on sloped surfaces is highly desirable.

5) Proven Solution: The track system should be an existing, commercially available product with a proven track record of performance. Solutions used in Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or similar vehicles are encouraged.

6) Ease of Integration: The track system must be designed for straightforward integration into the M88A2 platform without requiring extensive modifications or redesign. Simplicity of integration is a key factor in reducing overall program cost.

7) Cost-Effectiveness: Solutions must demonstrate value through a low Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Respondents should describe how their solution minimizes costs over the entire life cycle, including acquisition, maintenance, and replacement.

Offeror must submit country of Origin for the proposed track system or percentage of the system that is made in the USA.

Suspense date for submittal under this AOI is 04/06/2026.

b. Vehicle Power Generation and Distribution. These systems or kits install a power generation capability to a vehicle at power levels 30kW to 350kW. Power dense packaging allows minimal engineering for installation in a vehicle with severe space availability. Utilize mechanical power takeoff interfaces from transmissions or engines. These solutions can include components that convert, condition, and provide connection for power to the common end user voltages (i.e. 600VDC, 440VAC 60hz, 208VAC 60hz, 110VAC 60hz, 24VDC, 12VDC, et. Al). Solutions showing previous demonstrations in a vehicle are of interest.

c. Components Required to Enable Vehicle Power Generation and Power Distribution. GVPM has interest in highly integrated electric machines/systems that are highly compact, nearing serial production, and installed on a vehicle system. Also, interest lies in innovative packaging of electric machines, power controllers and thermal management systems to allow complete compact packaging under space constrained conditions. Capabilities at power levels 30kW to 350kW demonstrated on a vehicle are of interest.

d. Propulsion Systems. Highly integrated power dense drive systems integrating electric machines, energy storage (regen and et. al), braking, and gear reduction. End system applications for 8000lbs to 75000lbs GVW. Any integrated combination of multiple component functions mentioned are also of interest. Solutions showing previous demonstrations in a vehicle are of great interest.

.MODELING AND SIMULATION (M&S)

The GVSC M&S mission is to accelerate innovation through rapid prototyping and experimentation, leveraging industry expertise and soldier feedback to quickly iterate and refine Army ground platform capabilities, optimize design and performance by reducing development time and costs to rapidly evaluate multiple design approaches and incorporate continuous soldier feedback for enhanced usability and operational effectiveness, and inform strategic decisions by maintaining a competitive advantage with data-driven insights by quantifying capabilities, identifying critical technology gaps, and illuminating capability investment opportunities. This effort focuses on advancing modeling and simulation tools and capabilities through industry partnerships and collaborations.

a. Innovative Training Aids and Simulators. With increases in onboard capabilities and increasing technical sophistication of ground vehicles, GVSC is interested in commercial solutions that can improve training, fielding, and maintenance of ground vehicles. This includes providing training and simulations using on- board computing capabilities but also includes standalone equipment.

b. Applying Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Expedite the Platform Concepting Process for Early

Requirements Shaping and Trade Studies. GVSC M&S is looking to develop an on-premises, SME-credible AI-assisted ground-vehicle concepting demonstration that produces constraint-checked, auditable platform concepts suitable for early requirements shaping and trade studies. While the scope of this project includes expediting concept generation using a wide array of available AI methods, emphasis is placed on using LLM prompts to directly generate/expedite usable Computer-Aided Design (CAD) components. This work will be using decades worth of Government generated data and concepts and will not require additional contractor data. These AI methods must be usable within a U.S. government environment with expectations that the U.S. government will own rights to both the data being used as input but also for the resulting models.

c. Relocatable Facility Accreditation: Agile SCIF Security Oversight. The Government is executing a rapid prototyping effort to design, construct, build and deploy a relocatable facility, the Cybersecurity and Vehicle Cyber Center (CVCC), which requires accreditation for classified use up to the Top Secret level with eligibility for SCI access. This facility is being designed, constructed, built and deployed in the United States. Historically, applying the rigid Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 security standards to rapid, commercially modified prototyping programs has proven difficult to execute without causing significant schedule delays. This creates a critical need for a dedicated Site Security Manager (SSM) to bridge the gap between commercial manufacturing processes and strict government security oversight to include interactions with an Accrediting Official.

The Government seeks innovative commercial solutions to provide comprehensive security oversight. The traditional, sequential methodology for ICD 705 compliance is often incompatible with the speed of commercial prototyping. Therefore, the Government requires an "agile compliance process"—a solution that successfully integrates and enforces legacy ICD 705 government security oversight within a rapid, commercially driven prototyping program for a relocatable facility.

The Government is seeking industry partners capable of acting as the Site Security Manager (SSM) to ensure the aforementioned prototyping effort achieves full ICD 705 accreditation. The company shall have a Top Secret Facility Clearence Level. Submissions should demonstrate innovative methodologies for integrating security into the commercial prototyping lifecycle. Specific areas of interest include:

• Lifecycle Site Security Management (SSM) Oversight: This sub-topic seeks the provision of a qualified SSM to serve as the primary liaison between the commercial prototyping vendor, the Government Program Office, and the Accrediting Official (AO) / Certified TEMPEST Technical Authority (CTTA). The SSM must provide continuous oversight of architectural designs, material procurement, and physical construction, ensuring all deviations or commercial modifications are evaluated for their impact on ICD 705 compliance. The person shall have a Top Secret clearance with eligibility for SCI access.

• Agile Construction Security Plan (CSP) Development and Execution: This sub-topic focuses on the development, approval, implementation, and management of a CSP that adapts to a rapid commercial build schedule. The solution must meet the stringent physical, acoustic, and technical (TEMPEST) requirements of ICD 705 and ICS 705-1. Desired outcomes include innovative approaches to conducting security inspections, documenting construction phases, performing construction surveillance duties, and managing secure supply chains without halting commercial manufacturing timelines.

• Accelerated Accreditation Documentation and Delivery: This sub-topic focuses on the streamlined generation and management of all required accreditation artifacts. The desired solution will enable the agile preparation of the Fixed Facility Checklist (FFC), TEMPEST addendums, acoustic testing reports, and the final accreditation package to ensure the facility is ready for immediate operational deployment and AO approval upon delivery.

Anticipated Schedule: four months design activities, followed by five months pre-construction activities, followed by 11 months on site construction work immediately after award.

Suspense date for submittal under this AOI is 06/19/2026

VEHICLE ELECTRONICS AND ARCHITECTURE (VEA):

The VEA mission is to design, integrate and deliver vehicle electronics systems by leveraging advanced technologies to provide enhanced capabilities for military ground vehicles.

a. High Performance Compute Solution: The US Army is actively researching and evaluating embedded high-performance computing solutions to support next-generation capabilities in challenging operational environments. We are particularly interested in MOSA-based platforms capable of seamlessly hosting and integrating emerging technologies, including AiTR (AI-enabled Targeting & Recognition), Anti-jamming, Automated Lethality, Survivability, Electronic Warfare (EW) and Defense. The goal is to take current algorithms for these technologies as well as Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning (AI/ML) capabilities and evaluate them for true processing needs. We are interested in learning more about system architecture, processing power (specifically relating to AI/ML workloads), ruggedization, thermal cooling, security features, C-UAS, power efficiency, and demonstrated performance in similar applications.

DETROIT ARSENAL PROTOTYPE INTEGRATION FACILITY (DTA PIF):

The DTA PIF mission is to provide robust, innovative solutions to our customer requirements for our shared military missions.

a. Advance Vehicle Development - Rapid Response Hardware Solutions. To address emergent capability gaps, DTA-PIF is soliciting innovative commercial solution briefs targeting rapid response hardware solution focused on dual-use, modular, and easily deployable systems. The objective is to procure tangible hardware solutions capable of being manufactured, configured, and fielded in an expedited manner, rather than the months or years associated with traditional defense hardware programs. This initiative seeks industry partners to provide end-to-end development and delivery of turn-key hardware systems, from initial concept through low-volume manufacturing and sustainment.

What could I use the funding for?

Depending on the applicable Area of Interest, awards may support activities such as:

• Commercial technology adaptation

• Prototype development

• Pilot projects

• Demonstrations

• Agile software development

• Commercial integration

• Technology maturation

• Testing and validation

• Systems integration

• Sustainment activities

The Government also states that awards may support commercially available technologies, commercial technologies enhanced through strategic investment, existing government-owned capabilities, or concepts intended for broader defense applications.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

In addition to potential funding, selected companies may receive opportunities to:

• Demonstrate technology directly to Army subject matter experts.

• Participate in Army experimentation activities.

• Collaborate with Government technical experts.

• Mature commercial technologies for military applications.

• Potentially transition technologies into future Army programs.

The solicitation also provides flexibility to use several acquisition pathways, including commercial contracts under FAR Part 12, Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs), and Cooperative Agreements, depending on the specific effort.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Most Areas of Interest remain open for solution brief submissions unless an individual AoI specifies its own submission deadline.

The solicitation states that awards may be made throughout 2029, and additional Areas of Interest may be added at any time during the life of the CSO. Companies are encouraged to regularly monitor SAM.gov for new or amended topics.

The general evaluation process consists of:

1. Phase 1 – Solution Brief

2. Phase 2 – Presentation or Demonstration (if requested)

3. Phase 3 – Invitation to submit a Commercial Solution Proposal (CSP)

The Government may bypass phases, request additional information, or accelerate evaluations based on program priorities and available funding. Funding timelines are not specified in the solicitation.

Where does this funding come from?

This Commercial Solutions Opening is administered by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) under the authority provided by 10 U.S.C. 3458 for Commercial Solutions Openings.

GVSC is the Army's research and development organization for advanced ground vehicle technologies and supports Army modernization priorities across numerous technical disciplines including autonomy, mobility, survivability, power systems, software engineering, cyber engineering, manufacturing, and modeling and simulation.

Who is eligible to apply?

The solicitation is intended for companies and organizations with innovative commercial technologies that can help advance Army ground vehicle capabilities.

The solicitation specifically defines and references the following entity types:

• Commercial companies

• Small businesses

• Nontraditional Defense Contractors

• Nonprofit institutions

• Foreign-owned businesses (subject to applicable approvals and restrictions)

• Other organizations capable of providing innovative commercial products, technologies, or services

Companies must also satisfy standard federal contracting requirements before receiving an award, including obtaining a Unique Entity ID (UEI), maintaining an active SAM registration, registering in the required government invoicing system, and being determined responsible by the Contracting Officer.

Who is not eligible to apply?

The solicitation does not provide a general list of ineligible applicants.

However, organizations may be unable to receive an award if they:

• Are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal Government.

• Are prohibited by law or Executive Order from receiving federal awards.

• Cannot satisfy required registration requirements.

• Cannot obtain any required security approvals associated with a particular project.

Foreign-owned businesses may submit solution briefs independently or as part of a team. However, the solicitation notes that the ability to ultimately receive an award may depend upon obtaining the necessary clearances and approvals required for the proposed work.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

The solicitation does not prescribe a preferred company size or business model. Instead, GVSC emphasizes commercially viable, innovative technologies that can rapidly address Army modernization needs.

During Phase 1, solution briefs are evaluated primarily on:

• Responsiveness to the Area of Interest.

• Technical merit.

• Innovation.

• Commercial applicability.

• Availability of funding.

Across later evaluation phases, the Government also considers:

• Technical feasibility.

• Technology maturity.

• Schedule realism.

• Price reasonableness.

• Business viability.

• Intellectual property considerations.

• Ability to support Army requirements with commercially available or rapidly adaptable technology.

Overall, companies with mature commercial technologies that require limited additional development before Army demonstration or transition are likely to be well aligned with this CSO.

How competitive will this solicitation be?

The solicitation does not specify the expected number of awards or anticipated success rate.

Several factors suggest this opportunity will be highly competitive:

• It remains open across numerous technology areas.

• It is available to a broad range of commercial innovators.

• New Areas of Interest may be added throughout the life of the solicitation.

• Funding availability may vary by topic.

• The Government reserves the right to select all, some, or none of the submitted solutions.

Because solution briefs are evaluated against the published criteria rather than directly against competing submissions, applicants should focus on demonstrating clear alignment with the specific Area of Interest and providing a compelling commercial solution.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Important requirements include:

• Solution briefs, presentations, and proposals must be Unclassified.

• Individual solution briefs may address only one concept for a given Area of Interest.

• Companies may submit multiple solution briefs if each represents a separate concept.

• The Government generally expects a period of performance of 12 months or less, unless otherwise specified within an Area of Interest.

• Technical data with military applications may require export approvals.

• Proposal preparation costs are not reimbursed unless specifically stated.

• Proprietary information should be properly marked.

• Additional submission instructions may vary by Area of Interest.

Applicants should always review the individual AoI before preparing a submission, as additional technical requirements or deadlines may apply.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify how long applicants should expect to prepare a submission.

The initial Phase 1 submission is intentionally brief.

Unless otherwise stated by the applicable Area of Interest, Phase 1 consists of either:

• A written solution brief of no more than five single-sided pages, or

• A presentation deck of no more than fifteen slides.

Companies invited to later phases should expect additional preparation for presentations and Commercial Solution Proposals.

How can BW&CO help?

The DEVCOM GVSC CSO is significantly different from a traditional federal grant competition. Rather than preparing a lengthy proposal upfront, companies typically begin with a concise Solution Brief that must quickly demonstrate technical merit, commercial innovation, and alignment with the Army's Area of Interest.

BW&CO helps companies:

• Determine which Area(s) of Interest best align with their technology.

• Develop compelling Phase 1 Solution Briefs.

• Position commercial technologies for defense applications.

• Strengthen commercialization and transition strategies.

• Prepare presentation materials for later evaluation phases.

• Develop Commercial Solution Proposals (CSPs) when invited.

• Navigate the unique requirements of Commercial Solutions Openings, OTAs, and Army acquisition pathways.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

DIU - Massed Modular Aircraft CSO

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) is seeking commercial solutions for Massed Modular Aircraft (MMA)—cost-effective, theater-range unmanned aircraft designed to operate in large numbers despite expected combat losses. The Joint Force is looking for modular platforms capable of carrying a variety of payloads, including Full Motion Video (FMV) sensors, while supporting long-range strike, intelligence, electronic warfare, and communications missions.

DIU is specifically interested in technologies that can provide affordable, rapidly manufacturable unmanned aircraft capable of overwhelming sophisticated air defenses through mass rather than relying on small numbers of high-cost platforms.

Applications are due by 2026-07-23 23:59:59 US/Eastern Time. Companies should begin preparing immediately, as DIU rarely grants extensions and solution briefs must be submitted electronically through the DIU website.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify the amount of the award but typically these opportunities range from about $500,000 to about $5 million

What could I use the funding for?

Funding may support prototype projects for technologies that address the Massed Modular Aircraft Area of Interest, including solutions that provide:

• Cost-effective, theater-range modular unmanned aircraft

• Long-range payload delivery

• Full Motion Video (FMV) sensor integration

• Weapons employment

• Intelligence collection

• Electronic warfare

• Communications relay

• Modular payload integration

• Rapid technology integration using Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) principles

• Prototype development and flight testing

The solicitation identifies the following desired capabilities:

• Payload capacity of at least 2,800 lbs

• Unrefueled combat radius of at least 2,300 nautical miles

• One-way self-deployment of at least 8,000 nautical miles

• One-to-many operator-to-UAS control

• Hybrid SATCOM/mesh networking

• Operation from 6,000-foot or shorter prepared or semi-improved runways

• Approximately 25kW available power and 5kW cooling for payloads

• Full-scale prototype flight testing within 21 months of award

• Target Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in FY2031 consisting of 20 mission-ready aircraft delivered to an operational unit.

Capabilities Sought:

Primary Attributes Sought

• Risk Tolerance: Designed for affordable, high-rate manufacture, and minimized total ownership cost

• Sufficient Munition and Sensor Payload Capacity: Payload capacity of at least 2800 lbs

• Meaningful Range: Unrefueled combat radius of at least 2300 nautical miles while carrying payload and ability to self-deploy one-way at least 8,000 nautical miles

• Maximum Interoperability, and Integration: Capable of rapid integration and upgrades via exploitation of the following Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) tenets: a) Government Reference Architectures; b) Model Based Systems Engineering; c) formal methods-based software verification

Secondary Attributes Sought

• Autonomy for Control: a one-to-many operator-to-UAS control ratio

• Sufficiently Resilient and Integrated Communications: Hybrid SATCOM/mesh network connecting to Department of the Air Force-Battle Network (DAF-BN); execution of local airfield operations (taxi, takeoff, landing, and divert) under highly degraded or denied primary C2/SATCOM conditions

• Tactically Relevant: At least 200 knots true airspeed; operation from 6,000-foot runway or shorter, semi-improved or prepared

• Sufficient SWaP-C: Sufficient available size, weight, power (25kW), and cooling (5kW) to host a variety of internal and/or external payloads. Enables rapid payload exchange

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

The solicitation states that a successful Prototype Other Transaction Agreement may result in the direct award of a follow-on production contract or agreement without further competitive procedures if the prototype project is successfully completed.

The follow-on production effort may be used by one or more Department of Defense organizations and could be significantly larger than the Prototype OT agreement.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Application deadline

• 2026-07-23 23:59:59 US/Eastern Time

After submission:

• DIU evaluates Phase 1 Solution Briefs.

• Selected companies are invited to a Phase 2 virtual or in-person pitch.

• Companies selected after the pitch may be invited to submit a full written proposal for a Prototype OTA.

• Full-scale prototype flight testing is expected within 21 months of award.

• The target Initial Operating Capability (IOC) is FY2031.

The solicitation does not specify when awards or funding will be issued.

DIU states it will generally notify companies within approximately 30 days if it is interested in moving forward with a pitch.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) using the Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process.

Awards are made as Prototype Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022.

Who is eligible to apply?

The solicitation states it is open to:

• U.S. vendors

• International vendors

To utilize an Other Transaction Agreement, the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 4022 must be satisfied, including at least one of the following:

• At least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participates to a significant extent;

• All significant non-government participants are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors; or

• At least one-third of the prototype project cost is funded from non-federal sources.

Companies selected for award that do not already have a CAGE code are required to register in SAM.gov.

Who is not eligible to apply?

The solicitation does not identify specific categories of organizations that are prohibited from applying.

However, companies must satisfy the statutory eligibility requirements for Prototype Other Transaction Agreements under 10 U.S.C. 4022, and companies receiving awards must register in SAM and meet federal responsibility requirements.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Based on the stated evaluation criteria, DIU is seeking solutions that:

• Directly address the Massed Modular Aircraft problem statement

• Demonstrate strong technical merit

• Are technically feasible

• Offer a unique or innovative commercial approach

• Show company viability

• Demonstrate manufacturability

• Present acceptable pricing and schedules during Phase 2

• Address modularity, affordability, long-range performance, and operational relevance

The solicitation also emphasizes demonstrated commercial technology rather than conceptual ideas whenever possible.

How competitive will this solicitation be?

The solicitation indicates that DIU routinely receives more Solution Briefs than it has resources to award.

Only a select number of companies will be invited to the Phase 2 pitch, even if multiple submissions are considered technically meritorious.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Applicants should note:

• Solution Briefs should be approximately 5 pages or 15 slides.

• Submissions must be submitted electronically through the DIU website.

• Late submissions will not be evaluated.

• Only one concept may be included in each Solution Brief.

• Solution Briefs must be unclassified.

• Companies must certify submission requirements, including compliance regarding Controlled Unclassified Information.

• Any resulting agreement will require compliance with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019.

• Prototype projects generally should have periods of performance no greater than 24 months.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify the expected preparation time.

Applicants are encouraged to prepare a concise Solution Brief that is approximately five pages or fifteen slides and includes company information, an executive summary, technology description, commercialization information, and company viability details.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can help your team prepare a competitive DIU submission by:

• Assessing alignment with the Area of Interest

• Developing a compliant Solution Brief

• Positioning your commercial technology against DIU evaluation criteria

• Strengthening technical and commercialization messaging

• Preparing your team for the Phase 2 pitch

• Supporting proposal development if invited to submit a full written proposal

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Rapid Prototyping and Flight Demonstration of Medium-Range Affordable Mass Munition Air Vehicle Configurations for Collaborative Combat Aircraft and Fighter Platforms

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Rapid Prototyping and Flight Demonstration of Medium-Range Affordable Mass Munition (MRAMM) Air Vehicle Configurations for Collaborative Combat Aircraft and Fighter Platforms challenge seeks prototype solutions that increase missile density, reduce cost, and improve operational flexibility for air-to-air engagements in contested environments. The effort focuses on designing, integrating, and flight demonstrating affordable mass air-to-air weapon configurations that support collaborative combat aircraft (CCA), autonomous collaborative platforms (ACP), tactical fighter aircraft, and future manned or unmanned operational platforms.

The Government intends to rapidly prototype representative MRAMM air vehicle configurations capable of improving magazine capacity, aerodynamic performance, scalable manufacturing, and operational integration while generating data to support future force design and fielding decisions.

Application deadline: Oct 08, 2026, 09:32 AM, as listed in the Marketplace challenge. Reviews begin 17 Jul and occur biweekly, making early submission advantageous.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify the amount of the award but typically these opportunities range from about $500,000 to about $5 million

What could I use the funding for?

Prototype efforts may include:

• Designing prototype MRAMM air vehicle configurations

• Fabricating representative prototype systems

• Developing modular open system architectures

• Validating rail-launch compatibility

• Demonstrating scalable manufacturing approaches

• Integrating prototypes onto platforms such as the XQ-58A or other CCA/ACP assets

• Conducting captive-carry and flight demonstrations

• Evaluating aerodynamic performance and maneuverability

• Generating operational, manufacturing, aerodynamic, and integration data

• Supporting future force design and operational employment concepts

Desired solutions are intended to increase missile density while maintaining tactically relevant medium-range performance and reducing cost through scalable manufacturing.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

If successful, prototype efforts are intended to:

• Support future force design decisions

• Inform operational employment concepts

• Support future transition pathways

• Generate evidence for future operational experimentation

• Reduce technical and operational risk through rapid prototyping

The solicitation does not specify any commercialization assistance, mentoring, follow-on funding, or other participant benefits beyond the prototype effort.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Key dates listed in the solicitation include:

• Reviews begin: 17 Jul and occur biweekly

• Application deadline: Oct 08, 2026, 09:32 AM

• ONI anticipates a rapid down-select within 30–45 days of posting.

The solicitation does not specify when awards will be made or when funding will be received.

Where does this funding come from?

This opportunity is sponsored by:

• Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Engineering Prototyping & Experimentation (ODASW(P&E))

The contracting path states that award will be made under the ONIX OTA in coordination with ACC-RI.

Who is eligible to apply?

The solicitation states that the opportunity is open to:

• U.S.-based industry organizations

• Academic organizations

• Nonprofit organizations

Respondents must register on gocolosseum.org to submit.

Who is not eligible to apply?

The solicitation does not specify additional ineligible applicant categories beyond stating eligibility is limited to U.S.-based industry, academic, and nonprofit organizations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Based on the stated evaluation criteria, competitive proposals are likely to demonstrate:

• Strong aerodynamic performance

• Rail-launch compatibility

• Medium-range performance and maneuverability

• Modular open system architecture

• Increased magazine density

• Performance in contested, jammed, and stealth-enabled environments

• Lower unit cost

• Scalable manufacturing

• Successful flight demonstration

• Integration with XQ-58A or other CCA/ACP platforms

Evaluation emphasizes technical performance (40%), operational effectiveness (24%), cost and manufacturing (20%), and integration and demonstration (16%).

How competitive will this solicitation be?

The solicitation does not specify:

• Expected number of submissions

• Number of anticipated awards

• Historical success rates

Submissions will be evaluated through subject matter expert review and ONI's AI-powered rubric generation tools using the published evaluation criteria.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Applicants should note:

• Responses should be 2–10 pages maximum

• Registration on gocolosseum.org is required

• Proposals should include:

  • Company information

  • Past performance

  • Period of performance

  • Technical approach

  • Deliverables

  • Schedule and milestones

  • Payment schedule

  • Patents and data rights

  • Costs by milestone (ROM at a minimum)

The solicitation does not specify additional restrictions regarding cost share, TRLs, intellectual property requirements, or security clearances.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation requests a relatively concise submission of 2–10 pages together with company information, past performance, technical approach, milestones, costs, and supporting proposal information.

The solicitation does not specify an estimated proposal preparation time.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can help organizations prepare a competitive submission by:

• Interpreting the solicitation requirements

• Developing a compliant technical narrative

• Aligning the proposal with the published evaluation rubric

• Highlighting prototype maturity, manufacturing scalability, and operational impact

• Preparing milestones, schedules, and cost narratives

• Reviewing the submission for compliance before submission

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for NSWC Crane - N0016424SNB35

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) is an always-open opportunity for companies, universities, nonprofits, and research organizations developing innovative defense technologies that support U.S. national security. Rather than focusing on a single topic, this BAA accepts revolutionary research ideas and technology demonstrations across ten broad technical capability areas, allowing organizations to submit proposals when they have a compelling solution.

Proposals and abstracts may be submitted on a rolling basis. The current response deadline is July 7, 2027, at 4:00 PM EDT. Multiple awards are anticipated, and selected projects may be funded through procurement contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other transactions depending on the nature of the work. Organizations with technologies aligned to NSWC Crane's mission should engage early, as proposals are evaluated as they are received and funding availability varies by project.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify award amounts.

The BAA states:

• Multiple awards are anticipated.

• Individual award values will vary depending on the technology area and the proposed technical approach.

• Periods of performance will also vary by project.

• Awards may be made as:

  • Procurement contracts

  • Grants

  • Cooperative agreements

  • Technology Investment Agreements (TIAs)

  • Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs)

What could I use the funding for?

Funding is intended to support innovative research, development, prototyping, technology demonstrations, and related activities that advance NSWC Crane's mission.

The BAA seeks projects supporting one or more of the following technical capability areas:

• Electronic Warfare

• Infrared and Pyrotechnic Countermeasures

• Strategic Systems Hardware

• Expeditionary Warfare and Systems

• Advanced Electronics

• Sensors and Surveillance Systems

• Hypersonic Weapon Systems

• Power and Energy Systems

• Electro-optic and Infrared Technologies

• Force Level Electronic Warfare Mission Analysis, Advanced Concepts and Technologies

Within these areas, NSWC Crane is interested in technologies including (but not limited to):

• Artificial intelligence and machine learning

• Trusted microelectronics

• Radar and RF systems

• EO/IR sensors

• Quantum technologies

• Power and energy storage

• Advanced batteries

• Directed energy enabling technologies

• Cybersecurity

• Counter-UAS technologies

• Modeling and simulation

• Autonomous systems

• Advanced manufacturing

• Digital engineering

• Hypersonic technologies

• Sensor fusion

• Radio frequency-enabled cyber capabilities

Projects supporting multiple technical capability areas are encouraged but are not required.

Topic Areas:

• 1. Electronic Warfare (EW)

  Research and development for materials, material processing, microelectronics, radio frequency (RF), electro-optic infrared (EOIR) and other hardware that improves the efficiency, capability and responsiveness of EW systems used in all warfighting domains (land, sea, air, space, and cyber). Algorithms, digital signal processing techniques and photonics approaches that improves EW system responsiveness and accuracy. Hardware and software-based solutions focused on manipulation of electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) signatures or emissions to include signature management. Material and non-material solutions that improve sustainability and affordability of EW systems and their components. Novel and low-cost approaches to EW test and evaluation (T&E) supporting fast-to-field initiatives. Technology demonstrations that include prototypes of component or system level solutions to EW problems. EW mission analysis that may include a combination of live, virtual or constructive representations of EW systems, platforms or unique capabilities in single or multiple engagements and campaign simulations. Research and development that enable improvements in EW component or EW system Size, Weight and Power (SWAP). Research and development that support the integration of EW capability into unmanned systems. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) approaches with emphasis on accuracy, generalizability, and tactical employment of AI and ML in support of all EW functions.

• 2. Infrared and Pyrotechnic Countermeasures

  Research, design, development, prototyping, and demonstration of safe, reliable, and effective infrared (IR) and electro-optic (EO) countermeasures, countermeasure systems, and pyrotechnics for platform protection, target enhancement, counterintelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C-ISR), illumination, and signaling and marking. Seeking innovative approaches to Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force platform protection through design, development, modeling and simulation (M&S), integration, test and evaluation (T&E), and fielding of camouflage, concealment, and deception devices, countermeasures, threat warning, and dispensing systems. Unique solutions that improve current capabilities in M&S, T&E, simulators, and all infrared countermeasure and pyrotechnic solutions, especially those that also incorporate RF with EO/IR are encouraged.

• 3. Strategic Systems Hardware

  Research and development, prototyping, technology demonstration, and test & evaluation of safe, reliable, secure and effective hardware that supports the Department of Navy and DoD nuclear deterrence community. Innovation around Strategic Systems Hardware design starting at the physics level for materials and devices including quantum, mechanics, thermodynamics, electronics and electromagnetism. Application to specific systems and subsystems such as acoustic sensors, navigation, fire control, launch, flight, guidance, onboard & pier side mechanical & electrical support systems, as well as modeling & simulation and integrated verification & validation of those systems. Approaches that facilitate strategic hardware reliability through design, manufacturing and assessment of radiation hardened microelectronics for space missions, nuclear modernization, and missile defense are desired. Special emphasis is placed on research that enables secure, robust, and resilient microelectronics, sensors and embedded systems for military applications in severe environments. Other areas of interest include digital engineering and system modeling of requirements, interface management, system level architecture integration with model-based systems engineering. Data analytics, intelligent design with artificial intelligence and machine learning, configuration and data management, and improved procedures and trainings with augmented and virtual reality will be beneficial.

• 4. Expeditionary Warfare and Systems (ExWar)

  Research, development, prototyping, and demonstration of technology associated with Expeditionary Warfare, commonly considered mission sets executed by the USMC, NAVSPECWAR & SOF, NECC, and other maritime & land-based forces. ExWar technologies can include sensor systems, battle management systems, communications and command & control systems, and kinetic & non-kinetic effectors. Unmanned (UxS) and Counter-Unmanned (C-UxS) systems technologies are of particular interest to this area of research. Novel, end-to-end capability development and demonstration via rapid prototyping and fleet experimentation is a goal for the ExWar area of research. Areas of concentration at NSWC Crane in support of ExWar capabilities include EO/IR Sensor Systems, Radar Sensor Systems, Command & Control Systems, Cyber Security, Weapon Systems & Munitions, Power & Energy, Mobility Systems, and Electronic Warfare Systems. Capabilities that enable Naval expeditionary strategies and concepts, such as Distributed Maritime Operations, Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations, and force modernization are a focus for NSWC Crane.

• 5. Advanced Electronics

  Research, development, prototyping, and demonstration of affordable, sustainable microelectronics solutions that provide asymmetric capability for the Department of Navy and the DoD Enterprise in support of the following platforms but not limited to hypersonic weapon systems and their platforms, ballistic missile defense systems, electronic warfare systems, command; control; communications; computing; intelligence; surveillance; and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems, cyber-physical systems, space surveillance systems, maritime and undersea autonomous systems. Areas of interest but not limited to basic and applied trusted microelectronics research & development (including design, development, acquisition, test and evaluation, advanced prototyping, technology maturation and technology demonstration) in support of security systems engineering to integrate advanced electronics within complex systems satisfying security and resilience objectives. Microelectronics technology areas of interests include but are not limited to active and passive electronic devices, circuit cards, advanced Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) logic for ASICs and programmable logic, volatile and nonvolatile memory, radiation hardened technologies, advance packaging to include heterogeneous integration, advanced interconnect technologies, electronic controls, solid state transmit/receive modules, digital receiver exciters, digital beamforming electronics, DC to DC converters, microwave tubes, other radio frequency and optoelectronics technologies. Microelectronics technology test and evaluation areas of interests include but are not limited to model and simulation at the board, component, and circuit level, as well as operational environments to include radiation, cyber, electronic warfare across all identified microelectronics technologies. Additionally, solutions in development and demonstration of tools, techniques, and technologies for evaluation of microelectronics devices to support the confidentiality and integrity objectives of the DoD are desired.

• 6. Sensors and Surveillance Systems

  Basic research; applied research; advanced technology development; and advanced component development and prototypes that facilitate the maturation of Sensors and Surveillance System technologies and manufacturing capabilities. Sensors and Surveillance Systems include multi-domain sensors and systems supporting Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR); Counter-Uncrewed Systems (C-UxS); Radar; Electromagnetic Warfare (EW); Signals Intelligence (SIGINT); Electronic Intelligence (ELINT), Geospatial Intelligence (GEOINT), and Communications missions and activities. Solutions of interest target improvements to sensor size, weight, power, cost, and/or performance. Research and development areas of interest to demonstrate include innovations associated with metamaterials, microelectronics, 2.5- and 3-Dimensional packaging, advanced sensor architectures, power systems, thermal management solutions, mechanical technologies, networking solutions, processing systems, modeling and simulation capabilities, sensor fusion, and algorithms.

• 7. Hypersonic Weapon Systems (HWS)

  Research and development of technologies that support the development, integration, test and evaluation of HWS to include aerodynamics, aerothermal prediction and analysis, guidance, navigation and control, high temperature materials, thermal management, sensors and supporting algorithms. Any approach including materials and manufacturing processes that improve HWS performance, lethality, survivability, lowers costs or improves HWS and HWS component manufacturability (cost and capacity) is strongly desired. Innovative approaches and prototypes that lower the cost or increase the cadence of HWS testing and evaluation are also strongly desired. M&S of HWS components, subsystems and systems at all M&S levels (Engineering, Engagement, Mission and Campaign). Power and Energy solutions for HWS that reduce Size, Weight and Power (SWAP), improve power density or lower costs are welcome. Solutions that enhance microelectronics and HWS component, subsystem and system reliability and survivability in natural and prompt radiation environments are desired.

• 8. Power and Energy Systems

  Research, development, prototyping, test and evaluation, materials analysis, safety analysis, modeling, digital engineering, data analytics, data management, specification development, and production and demonstration of advanced battery technologies, advanced high energy density storage systems, high power energy storage systems, hybrid and all-electric propulsion systems, energy transfer systems, alternative and renewable energy systems, and battery management systems. Applications include space, airborne, missile, surface, land, undersea, manned, and unmanned platforms, hybrid and all-electric vehicles, human portable energy storage systems, and portable energy storage and energy conversion systems. Desired outcomes are as follows: (1) Improvements in battery power density in support of directed energy systems. (2) Improvements in battery energy density in support of extended mission endurance for space, airborne, missile, surface, land, undersea, manned, and unmanned applications. (3) Improvements in battery cycle life in support of aerospace applications and austere mission environments. (4) Enable integration onto high value surface, air, and undersea platforms by mitigating safety risks associated with lithium chemistry batteries. This includes advancements in battery casualty containment and early failure detection. This also includes advancements of battery technologies utilizing nonflammable electrolyte and solid-state electrolyte batteries. (5) Improvements of lithium chemistry battery performance in extreme cold weather environments. (6) Improvements in power management and distribution systems efficiency. (7) Improvements of solar array technology efficiency to support expeditionary mission sets. (8) Supply chain risk mitigations associated with power and energy technologies. This includes advancement of technologies, methodologies, and materials that increase availability of domestic raw materials, address obsolescence issues, enable processing of raw materials, and reduce dependence of rare earth metals. This also includes development and advancement of batteries and electric motors that utilize alternative materials. (9) Development of cost effective and supportable high voltage and high-power battery test systems.

• 9. Electro-optic and Infrared Technologies

  The objective of the Electro-Optic and Infrared (EO/IR) is to develop high-performance, low-cost, next generation EO/IR sensors, devices and autonomous processing to provide real-time detection, tracking, classification, and identification of air, sea-surface, and ground targets in all weather conditions. The primary interest is for systems working in the visible and infrared (near, short-wave, mid-wave, and long-wave) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, which is typically considered to be 0.4 um to 15 um in wavelength. Beyond imaging and detection, this area also includes supported EO/IR technologies and sub-systems such as optics, software, targeting and tracking, sensor protection, visual augmentation systems (VAS), laser pointers, free space optics (FSO), laser markers, and laser designators. Approaches and technologies that offer improvements or improved understanding in of these areas is of interest. Additionally, innovative approaches, prototypes, and tools that benefit modeling and simulation (M&S), test and evaluation (T&E), systems installation, logistics, or other approaches that reduced cost or benefit to the management of the entire EO/IR lifecycle are of interest.

• 10. Force Level EW Mission Analysis, Advanced Concepts and Technologies

  Research and development of technologies and capabilities that support development, integration, modeling and simulation, test and evaluation of distributed and integrated electromagnetic warfare mission capabilities to support joint and naval kinetic and non-kinetic operations delivering lethal and non-lethal effects in the air, surface, ground, space and cyber domains of the electromagnetic spectrum. Seeking innovative approaches to provide a comprehensive modeling and simulation and analytical foundation to represent non-kinetic effects and complex electromagnetic environments for evaluation at the engineering, engagement, mission and campaign levels of modeling to facilitate rapid evaluation of current and emerging electromagnetic systems and system of systems capabilities. Seeking novel model-based systems engineering approaches, non-kinetic models, and visualization of non-kinetic effects in a modeling and simulation environment. Solutions and prototypes that are focused on advancing radio frequency enabled cyber, hardware agnostic electromagnetic spectrum capabilities, advanced electromagnetic sensors and systems, decision-making aids, many on many threat simulators, and advanced countermeasures are welcome. Innovative approaches and prototypes that benefit modeling and simulation, test and evaluation, and development and evaluation of integrated and distributed system of systems capabilities to help reduce cost and enable rapid analysis and evaluation are of interest.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Potential benefits include:

• Opportunity to receive funding through multiple award mechanisms depending on project needs.

• Ability to submit proposals on a rolling basis.

• Opportunity for follow-on work where appropriate under applicable contracting authorities.

• Access to collaboration with NSWC Crane technical subject matter experts throughout project execution when appropriate for the selected award instrument.

The solicitation also notes that awardees may be eligible to use Department of Defense High Performance Computing Program resources with appropriate approvals.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Key dates include:

• Abstracts: Accepted on a rolling basis.

• Proposals: Accepted on a rolling basis.

• Response deadline: July 7, 2027, at 4:00 PM EDT.

• Project start dates are unique to each individual award.

The solicitation does not specify how long proposal evaluations or award negotiations will take before funding is issued.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by:

Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division (NSWC Crane)

within the

U.S. Department of the Navy

The BAA supports research across funding categories 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 and is intended to advance technologies supporting U.S. Navy, Department of Defense, and broader national security missions.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include:

Businesses of any size

Startups

Small businesses

Large businesses

Universities

University Affiliated Research Centers (unless prohibited by their UARC agreements)

Nonprofit research organizations

Other responsible research organizations

Teams and consortia

The BAA also encourages participation from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Institutions (MIs), although no funding is specifically set aside for these organizations.

Who is not eligible to apply?

The solicitation states that the following organizations are not eligible to receive awards directly:

• Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), although they may participate through eligible teaming arrangements where permitted.

• Department of Defense laboratories.

• Navy laboratories.

• Military universities.

• Warfare centers.

• Other federal civilian agency laboratories.

Additional eligibility restrictions may apply depending on the selected award instrument.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

NSWC Crane evaluates proposals using three equally weighted criteria:

• Overall scientific and technical merit.

• Potential military relevance and contribution to NSWC Crane and Department of the Navy missions.

• Availability of funding.

Strong proposals will generally demonstrate:

• Innovative technical approaches.

• Clear understanding of the state of the art.

• Qualified technical personnel.

• Strong technical capabilities and facilities.

• Meaningful relevance to one or more NSWC Crane technical capability areas.

• Potential impact on national security missions.

The solicitation also notes that proposals supporting multiple technical capability areas are highly desired, although not required.

How competitive will this solicitation be?

This opportunity is expected to be highly competitive.

The solicitation:

• Accepts proposals from all responsible sources.

• Anticipates multiple awards.

• Does not reserve funding for any specific business category.

• Evaluates proposals solely on technical merit, military relevance, and funding availability.

Because the BAA remains open for an extended period and accepts rolling submissions, organizations are competing against a continually evolving pool of innovative technologies rather than against a single submission deadline. The solicitation does not specify anticipated success rates or award percentages.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Applicants should be aware that:

• Proposal preparation costs are not reimbursed.

• Award amounts are not guaranteed.

• NSWC Crane may fund all, some, or none of the proposals received.

• Applicants must maintain an active SAM registration before award.

• Export control requirements may apply.

• Classified proposals are permitted under specified submission procedures, but resulting awards may remain unclassified depending on the effort.

• Cost sharing is generally not required and is not evaluated, although voluntary cost sharing may be considered.

• Certain award types prohibit profit or fee.

• Intellectual property, security, reporting, and other compliance requirements vary depending on the award instrument selected.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify the expected preparation time.

However, applicants should plan sufficient time to:

• Engage the appropriate NSWC Crane technical point of contact when appropriate.

• Develop either a white paper or full proposal.

• Prepare technical and cost information.

• Complete required registrations (including SAM if not already active).

• Assemble any required compliance documentation associated with the proposed award instrument.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO helps defense technology companies maximize their chances of success by:

• Determining whether your technology aligns with one or more NSWC Crane technical capability areas.

• Positioning your innovation around the evaluation criteria used by NSWC Crane.

• Developing compelling white papers and full proposals.

• Preparing compliant technical, management, and budget documentation.

• Managing proposal development from kickoff through submission.

• Supporting commercialization and follow-on defense funding strategy.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Event-Based Sensing Hardware and Algorithms for Navigation - SBIR Topic MDA26BZ04-NV008

Funding Amount:

$314,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

Develop novel and innovative low size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) event-based sensing navigation solution suitable for hostile flight and/or space environments that is not reliant on Global Positioning System (GPS) or Global navigation Satellite System (GNSS) inputs.

Description:

The proposed initiative focuses on the development of event-based sensing technology that utilizes advanced neural network models to enhance the navigation capabilities of kill vehicles and satellites. This system aims to operate independently of GNSS yet synergistically with existing inertial navigation systems (INS) or units, providing critical inputs that improve overall navigational accuracy and responsiveness in dynamic environments.

By leveraging neural networks, the technology will process event-driven data—such as changes in the vehicle's surroundings or mission-specific stimuli—allowing for real-time decision-making and adaptive navigation. Solutions should enhance the vehicle's ability to react to unforeseen circumstances but also allows for the integration of various sensor modalities, thereby enriching the situational awareness of the system.

The performance benchmarks for this technology are set to align with the precision of current GPS standards, ensuring that the navigation capabilities meet or exceed the existing levels of accuracy required for advanced military operations. Development should plan on integration into current Missile Defense Agency platforms to maintain compatibility with established navigation frameworks.

PHASE I:

Design and develop innovative solutions, methods, and concepts for an advanced visual navigation system utilizing event-based sensing technologies capable of low-earth orbit and/or extremely highspeed flight environments. Deliverables will include, description and data supporting initial design through modeling, experimentation, and/or testing.

PHASE II:

-Refine and document detailed requirements in collaboration with the platform(s) system integrator.

-Develop a functional system prototype or algorithm able to perform on representative hardware.

-Conduct comprehensive testing of prototypes in representative operational environments.

-Demonstrate successful navigation operation without GPS inputs.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

-Define clear navigation system requirements and interface specifications in collaboration with the system integrator.

-Produce flight ready prototype in accordance with test required volumes, power needs and interfaces.

-Demonstrate successful navigation outputs during powered flight that mirror GPS within acceptable tolerances stated by platform engineers and security allowances

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

FA9453-21-S-0001-Call016 - Space Strategic Technology Institute (SSTI) - Space Cyber-Cognitive Overmatch (SCCO)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Space Force, through the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), is seeking university-led teams to establish a Space Strategic Technology Institute (SSTI) focused on Space Cyber-Cognitive Overmatch (SCCO). This funding opportunity supports transformational research intended to produce disruptive technologies that improve the cyber resilience, autonomy, and operational effectiveness of future U.S. space capabilities.

White Papers are due no later than (NLT) 13 August 2026, 1100 Mountain Daylight Saving Time (MDT). Only offerors whose white papers are selected will be invited to submit a full proposal. The proposal deadline has not yet been specified and will be provided in Requests for Proposals (RFPs) issued to selected teams.

Unlike many traditional research programs that emphasize incremental advances, this solicitation specifically seeks technologies capable of fundamentally changing how military space systems detect threats, defend themselves, collaborate with human operators, and operate in contested environments. The Government is particularly interested in research that progresses beyond theoretical concepts toward testbeds, demonstrations, prototypes, high-fidelity modeling, and technologies capable of transitioning into government programs or industry applications.

The lead applicant must be a university that manages a consortium consisting of at least three universities, including itself. The lead institution will receive the award and distribute funding to collaborating institutions through subawards. The solicitation requires that at least 50% of awarded funds be allocated to supporting institutions. Additional collaborations with industry, nonprofit organizations, small businesses, and other eligible organizations are encouraged.

The Government anticipates providing up to $25 million in total Federal funding under this CALL. Individual awards may vary in value but are expected not to exceed $25 million and may last for up to 60 months, subject to available funding and successful Go/No-Go performance reviews throughout the project.

Projects should address one or more aspects of cyber resilience, artificial intelligence, distributed computing, quantum technologies, cognitive electronic warfare, human-machine teaming, digital engineering, or related capabilities that improve U.S. military space operations. The technical areas listed in the solicitation are intended as guidance rather than limitations, and applicants may propose additional technologies that support Department of Defense needs while increasing technology maturity and commercialization readiness.

Because this is a two-step competitive process, organizations interested in participating should begin assembling university partnerships, defining research objectives, identifying transition pathways, and preparing their white papers well before the 13 August 2026, 1100 Mountain Daylight Saving Time (MDT) submission deadline.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation states:

• The Government anticipates $25,000,000 in total Federal funding under this CALL.

• Individual awards may vary depending on the proposed effort.

• Estimated individual award values are not to exceed $25,000,000, although the Government reserves the right to modify, reduce, or exceed this amount if necessary.

• The Government reserves the right to fund all, some, or none of the proposals received.

• Funding remains subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

Awards are expected to support projects lasting up to 60 months, consisting of multiple budget periods.

Continuation funding is contingent upon:

• satisfactory technical performance,

• schedule adherence,

• milestone completion,

• reporting compliance,

• Go/No-Go decision reviews, and

• continued availability of Federal funding.

What could I use the funding for?

The solicitation supports research intended to create transformative capabilities for future military space operations rather than incremental improvements.

The Government states that successful projects should advance technologies capable of transitioning beyond laboratory research into operational government programs or commercial applications. Highly desired outcomes include:

• Testbeds

• High-fidelity modeling and simulation

• Demonstrations

• Prototypes

• Increased technology readiness over the period of performance

The Statement of Objectives identifies numerous technical focus areas, including:

Threat sensing, detection, and adaptive response

Projects may include:

• Advanced cyber sensing

• Threat detection metrics

• Trusted telemetry

• Data authentication

• Data provenance

• Fraud and spoofing detection

• Vulnerability mitigation

• AI-driven autonomous response

• Real-time cyber remediation across space, ground, and communications segments.

Cyber hardening and supply chain security

Examples include:

• Zero-trust architectures

• Secure satellite flight software

• Cyber-hardened satellite architectures

• Hardware and software supply chain security

• Software isolation

• Red teaming

• Quantifiable cyber-hardening metrics.

Artificial intelligence, autonomy, and cognitive execution

Potential projects include:

• Autonomous mission planning

• Dynamic satellite operations

• AI-enabled decision making

• Edge data processing

• Knowledge extraction

• AI model resilience

• Protection against adversarial AI attacks.

Human-machine teaming

Research may address:

• Advanced operator interfaces

• Decision-support systems

• Cognitive workload reduction

• Human trust in autonomous systems

• Consequence modeling for automated decision-making.

Distributed computing and quantum technologies

Examples include:

• Space-based data centers

• Cloud, fog, and edge computing

• Distributed computing architectures

• Quantum information systems

• Quantum sensing

• Post-quantum cryptography

• Quantum-secure communications.

Cognitive electronic warfare

The solicitation also encourages research involving:

• Adaptive electronic warfare

• Electromagnetic spectrum operations

• Combined cyber-electronic warfare resilience

• Space-enabled cyber effects

• Reconfigurable RF spectrum technologies.

Digital engineering and testing

Potential activities include:

• Flexible cyber testbeds

• Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)

• System-of-systems integration

• High-fidelity disruption modeling

• Uncertainty quantification

• Developmental and operational testing environments.

The Government also explicitly allows applicants to propose additional technologies beyond the listed examples if they strengthen DoD research and development, improve technology maturity, support technology transition, or increase commercialization readiness while meeting Department of Defense needs.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

In addition to potential funding, selected performers may receive several forms of Government support during the program.

Government technical support

DARPA anticipates support from:

• Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

• NIST's Precision Photonic Synthesis Group within the Time and Frequency Division

The Government expects to provide information, analysis, and support related to vibration-hardened optical reference cavities and photonic microwave generation techniques.

Government-furnished information

By Month 6, DARPA anticipates providing performers with:

• A Government reference design for a vibration-hardened chip-scale optical reference cavity

• Associated design details

• Test data

Government-furnished testing

At the end of Phase 2:

• Final noise-performance testing will occur at a Government test facility.

• Testing will use a Government-furnished airborne platform.

• The Government will coordinate and execute the testing.

• The Government will collect and post-process test data.

Potential follow-on opportunities

The solicitation states that:

• Follow-on production contracts or transactions may be awarded pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 4022.

• During the transition between Phase 1 and Phase 2, DARPA intends to finalize technology application areas and notes there is potential for additional work based on architectural designs developed during Phase 1.

The solicitation does not guarantee any follow-on funding or production awards.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond funding, the solicitation is designed to establish a long-term research ecosystem centered on transformational space technologies.

The Space Strategic Technology Institute (SSTI) model is intended to create enduring university partnerships focused on solving critical U.S. Space Force science and technology challenges. Rather than funding isolated research projects, the Government is investing in multidisciplinary research teams capable of developing technologies that transition into operational military capabilities.

Potential benefits identified in the solicitation include:

• Participation in a university-led Space Strategic Technology Institute.

• Opportunities to collaborate with multiple universities under a single research program.

• Collaboration with industry partners.

• Development of testbeds, demonstrations, prototypes, and high-fidelity modeling capabilities.

• Advancement of technologies to higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) throughout the period of performance.

• Opportunities for future technology transition into U.S. Space Force and other U.S. Government programs.

The Statement of Objectives also notes that, in later phases, the research ecosystem may expand to include additional:

• universities,

• industry leaders,

• international allies, and

• U.S. Government organizations including AFRL, DARPA, and other DoD laboratories.

The solicitation explains that these organizations may provide operational context, transition pathways, and end-user requirements that help mature successful technologies.

The Government also notes that continuation funding will be based on performance reviews and successful progression toward technology transition rather than simply completing research activities.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

This is a two-step solicitation.

Step 1 – White Paper

White Papers are due no later than (NLT) 13 August 2026, 1100 Mountain Daylight Saving Time (MDT). White Papers received after this deadline will not be accepted.

Offerors must submit:

• a White Paper,

• a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate, and

• all required supporting information using the prescribed template.

Organizations cannot submit a full proposal without first submitting a White Paper.

Step 2 – Full Proposal

Only offerors whose White Papers are selected will receive a Request for Proposal (RFP).

The solicitation states that the:

Proposal Due Date and Time – To be provided in "Requests for Proposals (RFP)" sent to offerors whose white papers are selected.

Questions

Written questions are due:

10 July 2026

The Government states that questions submitted after this date may not allow sufficient time for responses.

Webinar

A Questions and Answers webinar will be held on:

• 15 July 2026

• 0900 MDT

The Government encourages organizations interested in submitting White Papers to attend.

Award timing

The solicitation does not specify a fixed award date.

Instead, it states:

The anticipated award date will be determined through dialogue between prospective Offerors and Government representatives and specified in each individual award.

Period of Performance

Successful projects may run for:

• up to 57 months of technical effort,

• plus 3 months for the final report,

• for a total period of performance of 60 months.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided through the:

• Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Space Vehicles Directorate

• in partnership with the United States Space Force (USSF)

under:

• Advanced Research Announcement (ARA) FA9453-21-S-0001

• Space Technology Advanced Research – Fast-tracking Innovative Software and Hardware (STAR-FISH)

• CALL 016

• Topic Area 5 – Space Strategic Technology Institute (SSTI): Space Cyber-Cognitive Overmatch (SCCO)

The solicitation states that the purpose of this CALL is to support experimentation and research involving:

• spaceflight technologies,

• space-related signal technologies,

• energy technologies,

• transportation technologies,

with this particular CALL focused on transformational cyber and cognitive capabilities for military space operations.

Who is eligible to apply?

This solicitation is structured around university-led teams.

The lead offeror is expected to be:

• one university serving as the lead institution.

The lead university is expected to partner with:

• at least two additional universities, resulting in a minimum team of three universities.

The lead university receives the award directly and is responsible for managing the consortium and issuing subawards.

The solicitation requires that:

At least 50% of awarded funds are required to go to the supporting institutions.

Additional collaborators may include:

• universities,

• for-profit entities,

• nonprofit organizations,

• state governments,

• local governments,

• tribal governments,

• small businesses.

These organizations may participate as offerors or subrecipients, consistent with the consortium structure described in the solicitation.

Other eligibility requirements include:

• registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) before award,

• compliance with applicable Federal cost principles,

• adherence to Gold Standard Science requirements,

• compliance with applicable export control requirements,

• submission of required White Papers before invitation to submit a proposal.

The solicitation also states:

• Cost sharing is not required.

Who is not eligible to apply?

The solicitation specifically excludes several categories of organizations.

These include:

• Large businesses as defined under NAICS 541715 (over 1,000 employees).

• Federal Government agencies.

• Foreign-owned organizations, which are not authorized to participate in this CALL in any capacity.

The solicitation also establishes restrictions regarding foreign nationals.

Unless an approved waiver is granted by the Contracting/Agreements Officer:

• non-U.S. citizens may not work within AFRL facilities,

• non-U.S. citizens may not access U.S. Government IT networks associated with the project.

The solicitation notes that permanent resident ("Green Card") status does not satisfy the U.S. citizenship requirement for these access purposes. Certain exceptions apply for approved international exchange personnel and dual U.S. citizens, as explicitly described in the solicitation.

Additionally:

• organizations that do not first submit a White Paper are not eligible to receive an award under this CALL.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

The solicitation does not identify preferred companies or organizations. Instead, it describes the characteristics of proposals that are expected to be the most competitive.

Successful projects are likely to demonstrate a combination of technical innovation, transition potential, and practical applicability to U.S. Space Force missions.

According to the Statement of Objectives, competitive proposals should:

• Deliver transformative rather than incremental advances.

• Create technologies capable of fundamentally changing military space operations.

• Improve cyber resilience while maintaining mission performance.

• Optimize size, weight, and power (SWaP).

• Enable entirely new operational concepts.

• Demonstrate realistic pathways for transitioning technology beyond the laboratory into government programs or industry applications.

• Include testbeds, demonstrations, prototypes, or high-fidelity modeling whenever appropriate.

• Progress technologies to higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) during the period of performance.

The Government also encourages applicants to:

• Clearly define the current state of the art.

• Explain why the proposed approach is superior.

• Identify known limitations and risks.

• Describe how those risks will be mitigated.

• Incorporate horizon scanning and assessments of future adversarial threats.

• Build multidisciplinary teams spanning multiple technical and non-technical disciplines.

The technical areas identified by the Government include projects involving:

• Threat sensing and adaptive cyber response

• AI-enabled autonomous operations

• Cyber-hardening for space systems

• Zero-trust architectures

• Human-machine teaming

• Distributed computing

• Space-based data centers

• Quantum information systems

• Quantum-secure networking

• Cognitive electronic warfare

• Digital engineering

• Flexible cyber testbeds

• Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)

• High-fidelity disruption modeling

The solicitation states that these areas are guidance rather than restrictions, and applicants may propose additional technologies that support Department of Defense needs while increasing technology maturity and commercialization readiness.

During evaluation, White Papers and proposals must also satisfy the Government's Go/No-Go screening criteria.

Among other things, the Government states that successful submissions should:

• Demonstrate implementation of Gold Standard Science.

• Produce immediately demonstrable results.

• Include meaningful milestones.

• Establish clear benchmarks for measuring success.

• Accelerate delivery of emerging technologies to the warfighter.

• Demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities.

How competitive will this solicitation be?

The solicitation does not specify an expected number of White Paper submissions or an anticipated success rate.

However, several features indicate that this is expected to be a highly competitive opportunity.

First, the Government anticipates making one or more awards, while reserving the right to make one award, multiple awards, or no awards at all.

Second, participation requires a university-led consortium consisting of at least three universities, creating a higher organizational threshold than many standard research solicitations.

Third, the two-step process means that only White Papers selected by the Government will be invited to submit full proposals. Organizations that do not submit a White Paper are not eligible to receive an award.

The evaluation process also emphasizes:

• transformational research,

• technology transition,

• measurable progress,

• interdisciplinary collaboration,

• operational relevance,

• demonstration of immediate and longer-term impact,

• compliance with Gold Standard Science requirements.

For university teams with strong space cybersecurity, AI, autonomy, quantum, or digital engineering capabilities—and a clear transition strategy—this CALL provides a significant opportunity. At the same time, applicants should expect substantial competition given the size of the anticipated funding and the strategic importance of the research area.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Yes. The solicitation includes several important restrictions and administrative requirements.

Consortium structure

The lead offeror must be a university leading a team of at least three universities.

The lead institution is responsible for managing subawards, and at least 50% of awarded funds must be distributed to supporting institutions.

Two-step submission process

Applicants must submit a White Paper before they can be invited to submit a full proposal.

Organizations that do not submit a White Paper are not eligible for award consideration.

Foreign participation

Foreign-owned organizations are not authorized to participate in this CALL in any capacity.

Export control

The solicitation states that technologies supported under this CALL are subject to:

• International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and/or

• Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

Applicants proposing the use of foreign nationals must provide required disclosures, and additional Government review may be required.

Security

The effort is anticipated to be performed at the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) level.

Classified work is not anticipated at the beginning of the award, although security requirements may evolve during performance if approved by the Government.

Gold Standard Science

Applicants must commit to complying with the Government's Gold Standard Science requirements, including:

• reproducibility,

• transparency,

• communication of uncertainty,

• interdisciplinary collaboration,

• unbiased peer review,

• benchmarks for measuring success,

• adherence to applicable administration policies.

Cost sharing

Cost sharing or matching funds are not required.

Foreign travel

Foreign travel costs are not allowable unless approved by the Program Manager.

Construction

Major construction projects generally will not be funded without prior written authorization.

Funding availability

All awards remain contingent upon:

• availability of appropriated funds,

• successful performance,

• Go/No-Go reviews,

• continued Government priorities.How long will it take me to prepare an application?

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify how long applicants should expect to prepare either a White Paper or a full proposal.

However, prospective applicants should account for the time needed to:

• assemble a university consortium,

• identify collaborating institutions,

• develop a multidisciplinary research strategy,

• prepare a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate,

• complete the required White Paper template,

• request DoD SAFE upload access before the submission deadline,

• coordinate any required export control or foreign national documentation,

• ensure compliance with Gold Standard Science requirements.

Because White Papers are due no later than (NLT) 13 August 2026, 1100 Mountain Daylight Saving Time (MDT), interested teams should begin consortium formation and proposal development as early as possible.

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can support university-led teams throughout the entire application process by helping organizations:

• Evaluate alignment with the solicitation objectives.

• Develop a competitive research strategy centered on technology transition.

• Position technical innovations against the current state of the art.

• Build compelling commercialization and transition narratives consistent with DoD expectations.

• Coordinate multidisciplinary university and industry partnerships.

• Prepare compliant White Papers and, if invited, full proposals.

• Develop project plans, milestones, budgets, and supporting documentation.

• Strengthen proposal messaging while ensuring alignment with the evaluation criteria and solicitation requirements.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Ground-Based Affordable Mass (G-BAM) Challenge - SBIR Topic ARM26BX04-DV010

Funding Amount:

$2,000,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Note:

The following topic number, ARM26BX04-DV010 – Ground-Based Affordable Mass (GBAM), in this release is tied to a Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) Challenge Commercial Solutions Opening.

The DIU G-BAM Prize Challenge will be used to identify small business concerns that meet the criteria for a potential SBIR Direct-to-Phase II (DP2) award under this topic.

Finalists selected from the DIU G-BAM Prize Challenge will be the only firms eligible to submit an SBIR DP2 proposal under this topic.

Proposals submitted to this topic by non-winners of the DIU Prize G-BAM Challenge will not be evaluated.

How to Apply

Visit the DIU Open Solicitations page to read the full Challenge Announcement, topic details, and application instructions:

https://www.diu.mil/work-with-us/open-solicitations

Key Dates

• July 2, 2026: White paper submission window opens via the link above.

• July 14, 2026 at 11:59:59 PM ET: Response deadline via the link above.

(Challenge Submission Window Subject to Change. Please refer to the DIU Open Solicitations page for the latest information.)

DIU Prize Challenge applications are NOT submitted through DSIP.

Small business concerns that do not submit an application through the DIU Open Solicitations page (https://www.diu.mil/work-with-us/open-solicitations) before the deadline will be ineligible to compete or submit a full SBIR proposal to DSIP.

The DSIP proposal submission window tied to this topic is for the winners of the competition only.

Objective:

The United States currently faces an "unprecedented" military buildup by China and increasing air and missile threats that demand a robust deterrent. However, the current inventory of longrange strike weapons is dominated by high-cost, low-volume systems or aging strategic assets like the Minuteman III, which dates back to the 1960s. The lack of a cost-effective, ground-launched payload delivery system prevents the Joint Force from achieving producibility at scale, leaving the U.S. vulnerable in high-intensity, multi-domain environments where high-end munitions would be rapidly depleted. The objective of this topic is to facilitate innovative research on low-cost, rapidly manufacturable, payload delivery systems.

Description:

The Department of War (DoW) is pivotally shifting toward "affordable mass" to counter peer adversaries who are rapidly expanding their military capabilities.

While hypersonic systems offer high speeds, their exorbitant costs—exceeding $50 million per round—limit the military's ability to achieve the "magazine depth" necessary for prolonged conflict.

This project proposes a ground-based, non-hypersonic, long-range precision payload delivery system that leverages low-cost production methods and commercial technologies to provide a scalable, high-volume alternative that is a tenth of the price of current high-end munitions.

PHASE I:

This topic is accepting DP2 submissions for a cost limit up to $2,000,000 and a 12-18 month period of performance.

(DIRECT TO) PHASE II:

This topic is a DP2 topic.

In order for proposers to submit a DP2 proposal, they must provide justification documentation to substantiate that the scientific and technical merit and feasibility described above has been met and describes the potential military and/or commercial applications.

Documentation should include all relevant information including, but not limited to:

• Technical reports.

• Test data.

• Prototype designs/models.

• Performance goals/results.

This justification must be provided during the DIU G-BAM Challenge in order to be selected as a winner and eligible to submit a DP2 proposal under this topic.

The results from the DIU G-BAM Challenge demonstration event will be used to determine eligibility for DP2.

The objectives during Phase II are to produce prototype solutions that will be easy to operate by a Soldier.

These products will be provided to select Army or other Department of War (DoW) units for testing and experimentation with end Users in a realistic field environment.

Feedback from testing and experimentation will be provided directly to Small Businesses to iterate rapidly on recommended modifications or improvements for Army operational use.

In addition, companies will work with Army partners to develop a draft technology transition and commercialization plan for DoW and commercial markets.

Prototype capabilities sought include:

• Cost Efficiency: Achieve a "flyaway" unit cost of less than $2 million, representing a significant reduction from current advanced tactical missiles.

• Producibility: Demonstrate a company manufacturing process capable of producing at least 500 units annually.

• Operational Range: Validate a ground-launched threshold range exceeding 300 nm, matching or exceeding the capabilities of the Precision Strike Missile Increment One.

• Employment: Should not require the Army to develop or modify other systems for employment. Should be a “plug and play” system that easily integrates with existing transport, targeting, and situational awareness systems.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

The sub-system technologies developed for low-cost, long-range payload delivery have significant applications in the civilian/commercial aerospace and logistics sectors.

The artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous navigation systems required for these munitions can be adapted for commercial cargo delivery drones and autonomous maritime vessels.

Additionally, the push for additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping in the Indo-Pacific region to support these systems can revitalize domestic high-tech manufacturing, providing private companies with advanced production techniques that reduce costs for civilian infrastructure projects.

Additionally, this space lends itself to the potential for development of low-cost alternate fuel technologies.

Companies participating in the shoot-off are encouraged to propose tech development for manufacturing methods, materials, guidance, seekers, alternate propulsion, etc. to enhance their products.

These are the primary opportunities for commercialization.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

UH-60M Patient Handling System - SBIR Topic ARM26BX04-DV009

Funding Amount:

$2,000,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Objective:

This topic will explore optimizing the UH-60M interior to provide improved capability over the existing HH-60M in terms of survivability, functionality, and patient access by designing a modular Patient Handling System (PHS) that could be tailored to fit a multitude of aircraft.

Description:

All U.S. Army COMPOs face a technical problem concerning the ability to augment the MEDEVAC fleet to reach the end strength goal of 446 MEDEVAC aircraft.

The capability gap is driven by the reduction of the HH-60M fleet numbers, cancellation of the UH-60V program, and the divestment of the UH-60L MEDVAC variant.

A new MEDEVAC PHS is required to support a MEDEVAC capability on the UH-60M aircraft and support the end strength goal of 446 MEDEVAC aircraft.

The UH-60M aircraft will require an all-new technological solution that does not currently exist due to the design differences of the internal cabin structure between the UH-60M and HH-60M aircraft.

PHASE I:

This topic is accepting Direct to Phase II submissions for a cost limit up to $2,000,000 and a 12-18-month period of performance.

In order for proposers to submit a DP2 proposal, they must provide the justification documentation to substantiate that the scientific and technical merit and feasibility described above has been met and describes the potential military and/or commercial applications.

Documentation should include all relevant information including, but not limited to:

• Technical reports.

• Test data.

• Prototype designs/models.

• Performance goals/results.

(DIRECT TO) PHASE II:

During Phase II, in addition to the standard SRR, PDR, and CDR reports, key milestones for this effort will include:

• Solid Models of new I/PHS design.

• Airworthiness Qualification Specification (AQS) for the new design.

• Technology Demonstrator/Prototype of the new design.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

The optimized, lightweight Patient Handling System will lend itself to commercial medical evacuation missions on aircraft, ground vehicles, and developing heavy lift Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).

Specific to the aircraft market collectively known as Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS), there are over 1,000 aircraft serving this mission in the United States, providing critical transports to nearly 300,000 patients annually.

Further broken down, there is an estimated 230,000 critical care transports by ground vehicles, and 40,000 by fixed wing aircraft.

The opportunity nearly triples when the global HEMS fleet is considered.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Asymmetric Collaborative Counter Swarm - SBIR Topic ARM26BX04-NV008

Funding Amount:

$300,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Objective:

Develop and integrate a distributed Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology that can collaboratively command and control a multi-agent Group 1 or Group 2 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) swarm to defend an area against a numerically superior enemy swarm. AI system must be able to interface with existing, standard platform autonomy and perception systems. System must also not rely on a centralized control node

Description:

Develop and integrate distributed Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology that can collaboratively control a multi-agent Group 1 or Group 2 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) swarm to defend an area against a numerically superior attacking enemy swarm.

The vast majority of counter-UAS systems are optimized for a 1 vs 1 scenario, in which the interceptor UAS seeks to destroy, degrade, disable, or capture a single enemy UAS.

This approach typically relies on a sensor package and kinetic or non-kinetic effector optimized to degrade/destroy a single enemy UAS of a specific class (size, range, speed, etc.).

To defend an area against a numerically superior enemy swarm, individual UAS platforms must collaborate to determine the optimal strategy for many individual 1 vs N scenarios.

Individual UAS platforms must demonstrate the ability to target a cluster of enemy platforms through AI algorithms and active or passive inter-drone communication for targeting information from other friendly platform perspectives.

The UAS platform employed can be an off-the-shelf OEM or custom-built.

Key system attributes include:

• Must be able to collaborate across a homogeneous set of Group 1 or Group 2 UAS platforms to actively inform each friendly platform (given permissive network environment) of enemy UAS location, velocity, track, etc.

• Must be able to execute algorithms under extreme SWaP-C constraints with a total compute payload under 2 lbs.

• Must be able to passively collaborate and achieve similar, but degraded performance within a non-permissive network/communications environment.

• A single UAS platform must demonstrate the ability to degrade/destroy N enemy UAS within a range of 10 meters through either kinetic or non-kinetic effectors.

• Friendly UAS swarm must be able to severely degrade the combat power of the enemy to a fraction of X% of its original size.

• Although 100% degradation of the enemy swarm is ideal, depending on the degree of asymmetry, it may not be realistic. Therefore, a target final enemy combat power goal is achieved from the degree of enemy/friendly asymmetry. As shown in Figure 1, in a scenario where there is no initial asymmetry and our 1 v 1 capabilities are superior, the enemy should retain 0% of its original combat power. However, if that enemy/friendly initial combat power ratio were 4/1, final enemy combat power might be 75% of its original. The ideal curve is one in which final enemy combat power is 0% regardless of the initial asymmetric combat power advantages the enemy possesses.

This effort is not designed to create, design, or deliver a new UAS platform as the end item.

Rather, it is meant to develop technology that will leverage the existing capabilities of OEM drone platforms or, if necessary, custom-built drones by the performer.

The key deliverable is a suite of AI and other software algorithms that continuously plan and take optimal actions in a decentralized manner.

The algorithms run on each individual UAS platform, take advantage of active communications with other friendly platforms when operating in a permissive network environment, but can still operate under a denied or degraded network environment by communicating passively.

PHASE I:

This topic is accepting Phase I submissions for a cost limit up to $300,000 and a 1-6-month period of performance.

Conduct a feasibility study to assess what is in the art of the possible that satisfies the requirements specified in the above “Objective” and “Description” paragraphs.

Propose multiple algorithmic approaches, sensors packages, and assess tradeoffs in performance according to different combinations of such parameters.

PHASE II:

Develop, install, and demonstrate a prototype system determined to be the most feasible solution during the Phase I feasibility study on a Group 1 or Group 2 Program of Record UAS (or custom-built drone).

Simulation may be used for demonstration at very large scale for cost purposes.

However, demonstrations of swarm behavior must include hardware for smaller swarms.

The primary demonstrable capability is the decentralized execution of AI algorithms that enable active or passive collaboration of a friendly swarm of homogeneous UAS platforms that reduce the combat power of a numerically superior enemy swarm to a maximum degree.

Multiple evaluations in hardware demonstrating effective 1-N targeting will be conducted to ensure core capability can scale to larger swarms.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Protection of critical infrastructure in CONUS.

These are considered soft targets even if they are government facilities.

We have recently seen the threat domestically launched drones can have on any structure given how easily unidentified drones have been able to fly unencumbered in CONUS.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Asymmetric Collaborative Counter Swarm - STTR Topic ARM26TX04-NV001

Funding Amount:

$300,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Objective:

Develop and integrate a distributed Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology that can collaboratively command and control a multi-agent Group 1 or Group 2 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) swarm to defend an area against a numerically superior enemy swarm. AI system must be able to interface with existing, standard platform autonomy and perception systems. System must also not rely on a centralized control node.

Description:

Develop and integrate distributed Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology that can collaboratively control a multi-agent Group 1 or Group 2 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) swarm to defend an area against a numerically superior attacking enemy swarm.

The vast majority of counter-UAS systems are optimized for a 1 vs 1 scenario, in which the interceptor UAS seeks to destroy, degrade, disable, or capture a single enemy UAS.

This approach typically relies on a sensor package and kinetic or non-kinetic effector optimized to degrade/destroy a single enemy UAS of a specific class (size, range, speed, etc.).

To defend an area against a numerically superior enemy swarm, individual UAS platforms must collaborate to determine the optimal strategy for many individual 1 vs N scenarios.

Individual UAS platforms must demonstrate the ability to target a cluster of enemy platforms through AI algorithms and active or passive inter-drone communication for targeting information from other friendly platform perspectives.

The UAS platform employed can be an off-the-shelf OEM or custom-built.

Key system attributes include:

• Must be able to collaborate across a homogeneous set of Group 1 or Group 2 UAS platforms to actively inform each friendly platform (given permissive network environment) of enemy UAS location, velocity, track, etc.

• Must be able to execute algorithms under extreme SWaP-C constraints with a total compute payload under 2 lbs.

• Must be able to passively collaborate and achieve similar, but degraded performance within a non-permissive network/communications environment.

• A single UAS platform must demonstrate the ability to degrade/destroy N enemy UAS within a range of 10 meters through either kinetic or non-kinetic effectors.

• Friendly UAS swarm must be able to severely degrade the combat power of the enemy to a fraction of X% of its original size.

• Although 100% degradation of the enemy swarm is ideal, depending on the degree of asymmetry, it may not be realistic. Therefore, a target final enemy combat power goal is achieved from the degree of enemy/friendly asymmetry. As shown in Figure 1, in a scenario where there is no initial asymmetry and our 1 v 1 capabilities are superior, the enemy should retain 0% of its original combat power. However, if that enemy/friendly initial combat power ratio were 4/1, final enemy combat power might be 75% of its original. The ideal curve is one in which final enemy combat power is 0% regardless of the initial asymmetric combat power advantages the enemy possesses.

This effort is not designed to create, design, or deliver a new UAS platform as the end item.

Rather, it is meant to develop technology that will leverage the existing capabilities of OEM drone platforms or, if necessary, custom-built drones by the performer.

The key deliverable is a suite of AI and other software algorithms that continuously plan and take optimal actions in a decentralized manner.

The algorithms run on each individual UAS platform, take advantage of active communications with other friendly platforms when operating in a permissive network environment, but can still operate under a denied or degraded network environment by communicating passively.

PHASE I:

This topic is accepting Phase I submissions for a cost limit up to $300,000 and a 1-6-month period of performance.

Conduct a feasibility study to assess what is in the art of the possible that satisfies the requirements specified in the above “Objective” and “Description” paragraphs.

Propose multiple algorithmic approaches, sensors packages, and assess tradeoffs in performance according to different combinations of such parameters.

PHASE II:

Develop, install, and demonstrate a prototype system determined to be the most feasible solution during the Phase I feasibility study on a Group 1 or Group 2 Program of Record UAS (or custom-built drone).

Simulation may be used for demonstration at very large scale for cost purposes.

However, demonstrations of swarm behavior must include hardware for smaller swarms.

The primary demonstrable capability is the decentralized execution of AI algorithms that enable active or passive collaboration of a friendly swarm of homogeneous UAS platforms that reduce the combat power of a numerically superior enemy swarm to a maximum degree.

Multiple evaluations in hardware demonstrating effective 1-N targeting will be conducted to ensure core capability can scale to larger swarms.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Protection of critical infrastructure in CONUS.

These are considered soft targets even if they are government facilities.

We have recently seen the threat domestically launched drones can have on any structure given how easily unidentified drones have been able to fly unencumbered in CONUS.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS - SBIR Topic DAF26BX04-DP025

Funding Amount:

$2,000,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

Development and application of highly dispersible, survivable, and scalable kinetic defeat mechanisms capable of neutralizing Group 1-3 UAS threats.

Description:

This Department of the Air Force (DAF) focused open topic seeks C-sUAS defeat options for transition into the USAF and USSF, with a specific focus on transitioning technologies to AFLCMC/ES and the Joint Interagency Task Force 401 (JIATF 401) marketplace.

We seek the development and application of highly dispersible, survivable, and scalable kinetic defeat mechanisms capable of neutralizing Group 1-3 UAS threats.

This includes, but is not limited to, novel interceptor/munitions designs that achieve a <$6K cost per engagement and an effective engagement range of at least 800 meters.

Firing $30,000 interceptors at $500 commercial drones is financially unsustainable, especially against mass or swarm tactics.

Interceptors/Munitions must feature autonomous "fire-and-forget" terminal guidance with no user involvement required after launch.

System should be able to operate in a contested, GPS-denied environment.

It should feature the ability for simultaneous engagements.

Systems must demonstrate the potential to seamlessly integrate into various C-sUAS command and control frameworks.

Such systems include but are not limited to Medusa (SUADS).

It is preferred that systems are capable of operating in low collateral areas but not strictly required.

PHASE I:

This topic is intended for technology proven ready to move directly into Phase II.

Therefore, Phase I awards will not be made for this topic and Phase I proposals will not be accepted for this topic.

The applicant is required to provide detail and documentation in the Direct-to-Phase-II (D2P2) proposal which demonstrates accomplishment of a “Phase I-type” effort, including a feasibility study.

This includes determining, insofar as possible, the scientific and technical merit and feasibility of ideas appearing to have commercial potential of a very low-cost kinetic defeat mechanism.

The applicant should have defined a clear, immediately actionable plan with the proposed solution.

The feasibility study should have:

1. Describe the pathway to integrating with DAF operations, to include how the applicant plans to accomplish core technology development, navigate applicable regulatory processes, and integrate with other relevant systems and/or processes discussed in the Topic Description.

2. Describe if and how the solution can be used by other DoD, Governmental, or non-Federal customers.

3. Describe how the solution can neutralize Group 1-3 UAS threats.

PHASE II:

Deliver a field-ready, production-representative interceptor system demonstrating a strict sub $6k cost per unit.

Demonstrate engagement of Group 1−3 threats at 800m (Threshold) and 5km (Objective).

Proposals should include development, demonstration, and/or test and evaluation of the proposed solution prototype.

The relevant use case will be the defense of base assets, which will include integration with other defensive measures (munitions, non-kinetic weapons, and persistent ISR methods) using a system-of-systems and multi-layer detect and defeat system approach.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Transition to AFLCMC/ES and the JIATF-401 C-UAS marketplace for Base Defense.

Commercial dual-use applications include:

• Airport security.

• Critical infrastructure protection.

• Border patrol.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Advancing Assured Access: Integrated Digital Capabilities for the 2 SLS to Accelerate Mission Tempo and Readiness - SBIR Topic DAF26BX04-DV508

Funding Amount:

$2,000,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

The objective of this SBIR is to develop integrated digital capabilities that will assist spaceport operations in enhancing mission readiness. This effort will introduce modern tools for scheduling, information management, and historical data retrieval. Together, these capabilities will provide teams with improved information access to support training and official duties, thereby raising the overall baseline of operational readiness to meet accelerated demands. The objective of this project is to develop integrated digital capabilities to enhance space launch operations. This effort will combine advanced scheduling assistance, centralized information management, and an intelligent search tool for historical data. Together, these capabilities will provide teams with improved access to information, supporting training and official duties and enhancing overall operational readiness for future launch demands.

Description:

As launch cadences and mission tempos continue to increase, this topic seeks to modernize operational processes to maintain high levels of mission readiness.

The goal is to improve efficiency and enhance access to institutional knowledge to better sustain a high operational tempo.

This topic seeks integrated digital capabilities that combine intelligent scheduling assistance, centralized information management, and an advanced search function.

These capabilities will deliver scheduling optimization, synchronized information, and rapid access to historical data.

The tools will enable users to quickly search, retrieve, and apply knowledge across systems for training, mission planning, and official duties.

Together, these integrated capabilities will reduce manual workload, improve decision quality, and raise the baseline knowledge of the workforce to achieve a higher mission tempo and operational readiness.

Solutions must provide usable outputs for government operators and integrate securely with existing enterprise systems while meeting all security requirements.

PHASE I:

This topic is intended for technology proven ready to move directly into Phase II.

Therefore, Phase I awards will not be made for this topic.

The applicant is required to provide detail and documentation in the D2P2 proposal which demonstrates accomplishment of a “Phase I-type” effort, including a feasibility study.

This feasibility study must clearly identify potential stakeholders, describe the pathway to integrating with DAF operations (including core technology development, regulatory processes, and system integration), and explain how the solution can be used by other DoD or governmental customers.

In addition, applicants should demonstrate a framework design as proof of concept for integrated digital capabilities supporting launch operations.

This framework should illustrate how intelligent scheduling assistance, centralized mission information management, and an intelligent query search can work together to accelerate mission tempo and readiness.

The enhanced search tool is a critical component, enabling users to rapidly search, retrieve, and synthesize historical data across systems to support training, mission planning, and official duties, thereby significantly raising the baseline knowledge and preparedness of Space Force teams operating in a high-tempo environment.

PHASE II:

Phase II will focus on developing and refining the modernized software tools outlined in the feasibility study, with a primary goal of enhancing validation speed, user interface usability, recommendation accuracy, and expanding the scope of data sources and constraints.

Specifically, Phase II aims to deliver a cohesive software solution(s) capable of providing intelligent scheduling assistance for safety and reliability oversight shift operations, centralized mission integration information aggregation and distribution, and an intelligent search interface.

The intelligent search tool will serve as a key capability by enabling users to rapidly search, retrieve, and synthesize archived records across systems to support training, mission planning, and official duties.

This solution addresses the pressing need for improved operational efficiency and significantly higher operational pace and preparedness for local launch operators.

The development process will involve ingesting data from personnel systems, certification trackers, operational tasking tools, and mission integration repositories to deliver:

• Real-time scheduling optimization.

• Synchronized information management.

• Version control.

• Automated notifications.

• Past operational data access.

Phase II will also focus on seamless integration with existing Space Force workflows through secure APIs, conducting operational demonstrations with safety oversight and integration teams, and ensuring full compatibility with both unclassified and classified systems, as necessary.

The solution will be designed to provide actionable outputs for USSF schedulers, operators, and leadership.

Overall, Phase II will build upon the foundation laid in the feasibility study by refining the solution, improving performance metrics, and expanding its applicability across multiple sites, mission areas, and classification levels.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Phase III will focus on scaling the modernized software tools developed in Phase II across all safety and reliability oversight and integration teams supporting local launch operators and the broader Space Force enterprise.

The primary goal is to expand the solution’s scope and impact to enable comprehensive support for high-demand mission profiles across multiple operational locations and classification levels.

Specifically, Phase III aims to deliver an enterprise-wide capability that matures intelligent scheduling assistance, centralized integration information management, and an intelligent search interface into a fully operational system.

The automated query assistant will be enhanced to provide rapid, context-aware access to archived records and institutional data, enabling Guardians to efficiently support training, mission planning, and real-time decision-making.

This solution addresses the critical need for a sustained operational pace, improved operational efficiency, reduced manual workload, and elevated preparedness across the digital launch facility.

Phase III will involve:

• Expanding data sources and analytical techniques.

• Advancing real-time notification systems.

• Enhancing system integration through secure APIs.

• Conducting operational evaluations with end users.

Collaboration with key stakeholders, including Space Systems Command (SSC) and other Space Force units, will be essential to ensure alignment with evolving operational requirements.

Overall, Phase III will build upon the foundation laid in prior phases by scaling the solution enterprise-wide, improving performance and usability, and expanding its applicability to additional mission areas.

The resulting capability will also have strong dual-use potential for other DoD components, federal agencies, and commercial organizations with complex 24/7 scheduling, information management, and knowledge access requirements.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Commercial-Derived Insights for Novel Tactical Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Tracking (TacSRT) Capabilities - SBIR Topic DAF26BX04-NV506

Funding Amount:

$175,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

The objective of this Phase I effort is to identify, assess, and demonstrate the feasibility of novel, non–missile-warning space and/or ground enabled sensing and analytic capabilities that can deliver rapid, commercially derived insights with meaningful operational utility. The effort seeks concepts that enhance geospatial tactical awareness, reduce operational risk, and provide operators with timely, relevant, and resilient information in contested environments. Phase I will evaluate scientific and technical feasibility, characterize expected performance, and define the minimum viable capability that can be matured into a rapidly fieldable prototype in Phase II.

Description:

This topic seeks to rapidly field non–missile-warning, space and/or ground enabled sensing and analytic capabilities that enhance warfighter decision speed.

Space Force Components and Combatant Commands increasingly depend on commercially derived, space and/or ground enabled insights, but existing systems lack the responsiveness, automation, and sensing diversity needed for real-time tactical awareness.

Adversary advancements and dynamic operational environments have outpaced traditional acquisition approaches, creating critical gaps that Tactical Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Tracking (TacSRT) is working to solve.

Aligned with the Space Force Commercial Space Strategy, this topic solicits innovative, unclassified concepts across the sensing-to-analysis continuum—including data collection, phenomenology exploitation, analytic fusion, and information delivery—that can deliver meaningful operational utility within one year.

Proposed solutions may introduce new sensing or analytic methods or significantly advance existing commercial approaches.

An initial operational capability (IOC) is defined as a functional prototype that provides testable outputs directly to operators.

Solutions may include hardware, software, analytic tools, sensing concepts, data-processing architectures, or integrated workflows.

Stand-alone capabilities and service-based models are acceptable, and performers may leverage commercial space-as-a-service or existing commercial space infrastructure.

Approaches must deliver timely, operationally relevant insights without requiring government development of new space hardware.

Representative in-scope areas include:

• Novel phenomenology sensing.

• Automated exploitation pipelines.

• Multi-sensor fusion.

• Change detection.

• Activity characterization.

• Material or environmental signature analysis.

• Deep maritime or littoral monitoring.

• Rapid-revisit analytics.

• Unconventional sensing approaches.

• Space-to-air or space-to-ground tipping and cueing.

• High-cadence environmental insight.

• Incorporation of AI/ML.

• Fusion of structured or unstructured data.

Out-of-scope areas include:

• Missile warning/tracking.

• Kinetic interceptors.

• Satellite buses.

• Launch vehicles.

The overarching intent is to operationalize commercial capabilities rapidly and ensure warfighters receive meaningful, unique insights at the speed of need.

The intent of this effort is not focused on Operational Planning Product (OPP) generation through the Global Data Marketplace but targets a new innovative solution (view Reference 1 for additional context).

PHASE I:

Phase I will determine the technical merit, scientific feasibility, and operational applicability of proposed non–missile-warning space-enabled sensing or analytic capabilities.

Over a three-month Period of Performance (PoP), performers will identify the core technical approach, characterize expected performance, and validate feasibility through targeted analysis, modeling, simulation, or initial prototype demonstrations.

Activities may include:

• Characterizing sensing or analytic methods and defining the minimum viable capability.

• Conducting trade studies, modeling, data analysis, or small-scale experiments.

• Assessing performance in relevant operational scenarios aligned to SRT-supported Components.

• Evaluating pathways for integration into existing commercial-derived workflows or architectures.

• Identifying technical risks, operational constraints, data dependencies, and mitigation strategies.

• Outlining expected capability maturity achievable within a 12-month timeframe, from Phase I contract award through Phase II.

Phase I must culminate in:

1. A clear feasibility assessment supported by technical evidence.

2. A Phase II plan aligned to the schedule, including delivery of an initial operational capability and full prototype within the Phase II PoP.

3. Defined operating parameters and anticipated performance metrics.

4. An integration and transition concept demonstrating how the capability can support SRT mission needs.

Performers must demonstrate that Phase II development can begin immediately to ensure continuity and minimizing administrative latency.

PHASE II:

Phase II will mature the feasible concepts identified in Phase I into a deployable, testable prototype.

As the principal R&D effort, Phase II will include design refinement, system development, integration activities, and operationally relevant testing focused on delivering a measurable improvement in tactical insight or decision advantage.

Activities may include:

• Developing and demonstrating a prototype that produces actionable outputs.

• Conducting system integration, to include data pipelines, processing architectures, or delivery mechanisms.

• Evaluating performance across key operating parameters such as latency, persistence, coverage, accuracy, resilience, and usability.

• Testing in relevant or operationally representative environments, including SRT-supported workflows.

• Iterating capability in collaboration with Space Force Components and end users.

• Documenting performance, reliability, and scalability for transition planning.

Success criteria for Phase II include:

• Demonstrated prototype capability that materially improves the sensing or analytic options available to the warfighter.

• Ability to integrate outputs into operational workflows with minimal burden on users.

• Evidence that commercial markets can support long-term sustainment or scaling.

• Achievable path to Phase III transition, including identification of customers, funding mechanisms, and required approvals.

For Phase II proposals, the target should be to develop a working prototype for immediate operational demonstration and transition as soon as possible and adhere to the expected capability maturity timeframe developed in Phase I.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Phase III will pursue full transition of the capability to operational use through non-SBIR/STTR funding streams.

This phase may include final integration, expanded testing, scaling to larger user bases, or adaptation for additional mission partners.

Capabilities entering Phase III should target a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 6-7, demonstrating functionality in relevant environments and readiness for operational deployment.

Activities may include:

• Full integration into SRT operational workflows or related architectures.

• Transition planning with acquiring organizations, including SYD 810/ETT, and their stakeholders.

• Compliance with security, accreditation, data, and interoperability requirements.

• Engagement with Combatant Commands and Partner Nations for expanded adoption.

• Identifying dual-use opportunities across defense, civil, and commercial markets to strengthen long-term sustainability.

Phase III success is achieved when the capability is fielded at scale, provides recurring operational value, and reduces warfighter risk by delivering timely, commercial-derived insights that expand sensing diversity and strengthen decision advantage.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

High Precision Specialized Waveguides for Extreme Temperatures - SBIR Topic DON26BZ04-NV067

Funding Amount:

$315,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

Provide specialized waveguides capable of high temperature, high power, low loss, robust, and agile transmission of radio frequency (RF) signals within a hypersonic vehicle.

Description:

The use of RF cables has difficulty meeting environmental conditions while maintaining signal integrity and power requirements.

Hypersonic surface temperatures can exceed over 1,000-degree C.

Waveguides provide high power transmission and might be easier to manage under extreme hypersonic conditions.

The Navy seeks RF transmission that focuses on high frequency, is consistent performance across a vast range of extreme thermal temperatures, and provides long durations of high thermal loads.

The ability to produce complex and unique shapes while maintaining signal performance is required.

The development of these waveguides should address extreme hypersonic conditions.

The RF frequencies are across a large spectrum for different antennas/capabilities, but waveguides become too large at lower frequencies.

To be successful, the waveguides should target frequency bands of X, Ku, K, and Ka.

Any dielectric medium may be used within the waveguide.

A successful dielectric material would have a permittivity near that of a vacuum, such as air, to ensure low-loss transmission, specifically at extreme temperatures.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified.

Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. owned and operated with no foreign influence as defined by 32 U.S.C. § 2004.20 et seq., National Industrial Security Program Executive Agent and Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) formerly Defense Security Service (DSS).

The selected contractor must be able to acquire and maintain at least a secret-level facility and Personnel Security Clearances.

This will allow contractor personnel to perform on advanced phases of this project as set forth by DCSA and SSP in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement.

The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material during the advanced phases of this contract IAW the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), which can be found at Title 32, Part 2004.20 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

PHASE I:

Provide feasibility of producing X through Ka band waveguides out of a material robust enough to withstand the extreme environmental conditions of a hypersonic vehicle.

During this stage of the development, a prototype of any band is desired to demonstrate operation, but not required to transition to Phase II.

Tolerances, bends, and refined connections/adapters will be implemented in Phase II.

Describe how this manufacturing capability can make custom waveguides that will meet all hypersonic conditions.

Define:

• The limitations.

• Improvements over other materials.

• Improvements over other manufacturing methods.

• Description on high volume production (including any limitations or areas of future investment opportunities).

The Phase I Option, if exercised, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype solution in Phase II.

PHASE II:

Develop a custom part that meets extreme environmental condition tests that must assess the transmission of X, Ku, K, or Ka band RF signals.

Do extensive machining and testing to provide tolerances, bending limits, and custom connections/adapters concepts that could be adopted and implemented quickly.

(Note: The design may be an iterative process to improve performance of the waveguide and to specific requirements.)

Demonstrate the prototype’s ability to meet the requirements presented at the beginning of Phase II.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Support the Government in transitioning the technology for Government use.

The transitioned product is expected to support current and future hypersonic and space systems, as well as a wide range of other air, land, and sea-based systems.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Domestic Production of Plant-based Carbon Fiber Precursors in Support of Hypersonic Applications - SBIR Topic DON26BZ04-NV066

Funding Amount:

$315,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

Develop an environmentally friendly processing method to produce a plant-based carbon fiber precursor for high-temperature applications.

Description:

Rayon-based carbon fibers remain the choice of material as reinforcement in carbon phenolic composites used as thermal protection systems for hypersonics.

Currently, rayon fiber precursors used to make rayon-based carbon fibers are not produced in the United States and are subject to the volatile global market for rayon fibers.

Moreover, rayon fibers are vital to other Department of Defense programs, NASA, and commercial space companies due to their proven superior thermal performance over polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and pitch-based carbon fibers [Ref 1].

The production of rayon fibers ceased in the United States in 1997 due to the increased cost associated with environmental concerns from the traditional viscose process to produce rayon fibers.

Since then, rayon fiber precursors have been sourced from European textile companies that primarily produce rayon for applications other than as a precursor for carbon fiber.

Among the 6.5 million metric tons of rayon fibers produced per year, approximately 1.6-3.2 metric kilotons are rayon fiber precursors used to make carbon fiber [Ref 2].

The global market for rayon is shifting toward a non-toxic process to produce rayon fibers; however, new rayon fibers and other plant-based (cellulose or lignin) fibers have yet to be proven as adequate precursors to produce carbon fibers for thermal protection systems.

Therefore, research on environmentally friendly processes to produce a rayon fiber precursor or another plant-based fiber is needed to establish a domestic source of carbon fiber precursor suitable for thermal protection systems.

The fiber precursor must be able to be carbonized into a carbon fiber and characterized for structure and properties.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified.

Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. owned and operated with no foreign influence as defined by 32 U.S.C. § 2004.20 et seq., National Industrial Security Program Executive Agent and Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) formerly Defense Security Service (DSS).

The selected contractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances.

This will allow contractor personnel to perform on advanced phases of this project as set forth by DCSA and NAVSEA in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement.

The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material during the advanced phases of this contract IAW the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), which can be found at Title 32, Part 2004.20 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

PHASE I:

Develop a proof of concept for the processing of cellulose or lignin to produce a fiber precursor for the production of carbon fibers.

(Note: The fiber precursor is expected to be carbonized into a carbon fiber. The subsequent carbon fiber is expected to be characterized for break strength and carbon content.)

Ensure that the process meets Environmental Protection Agency standards for effluent from fiber processing in accordance with pertinent environmental regulations for the production of fibers.

The Phase I Option, if exercised, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype solution in Phase II.

PHASE II:

Build upon the process identified during Phase I by weaving and carbonizing the fiber precursor to create a carbon fabric prototype.

(Note: For applicability into thermal protection systems, the fiber precursor can be woven into fabric prior to or after carbonization.)

Provide, at a minimum, the following characterization analysis of the prototype:

1. Electrical conductivity.

2. Density.

3. Char yield.

4. Break strength.

5. Alkali metal impurities content of the carbonized fabric.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Scale the process in order to produce fiber precursors that can be woven, carbonized, and integrated into applicable polymer matrices to deliver a polymer matrix composite component for a thermal protection system.

Transition the composite to the Navy based on its thermal and ablative performance in an arc jet test.

Provide additional characterization such as the composite’s density, thermal conductivity, char yield, spectral emissivity, tensile strength, and shear strength.

Support the government in transitioning the technology for government use.

The transitioned product is expected to be able to support current and future weapon and space systems, as well as a wide range of other air-, land-, and sea-based systems.

The development of a domestic course of rayon-based carbon fibers would be of interest to the Army, Navy, Air Force, NASA, and commercial space programs for rocket nozzles and thermal protection systems.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Non-Volatile Memory for Extreme Environments - SBIR Topic DPA26BZ04-DV017

Funding Amount:

$1,200,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

ITAR:

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

Objective:

Develop and demonstrate a co-packaged temperature-hard (-269°C to +600°C) and radiation-tolerant NOR Flash memory system for extreme environment applications.

Description:

DARPA seeks to enable high performance computing for DoW systems that must function in extreme environments.

Nonvolatile memory is a bottleneck, even in commercial High-Performance Computing and Artificial Intelligence systems. This phenomenon is referred to as the ‘Memory Wall’, where processing speeds become limited by memory access time.

While there has been extensive research in emerging technologies to overcome this barrier, no commercial technology has shown the ability to reliably function in both high temperature and high radiation environments.

Today's charge-trap based NVMs, magnetoresistive RAM (MRAM), and resistive RAM (RRAM), each have significant deficiencies that limit their use in extreme conditions.

MRAM, which stores data using magnetic states rather than electrical charges, offers some inherent advantages in radiation-heavy environments. However, current MRAM technology is typically limited to an operating temperature of around 105°C, falling short of the requirement for some of the most demanding applications.

RRAM is a promising technology that relies on the formation and rupture of conductive filaments. While it has shown some radiation hardness, RRAM can suffer from filament instability and variable resistance when exposed to radiation, leading to unreliable performance.

The ideal NVM for extreme environments would possess several key characteristics:

• Inherent radiation hardness: the fundamental storage mechanism should be resistant to the effects of ionizing radiation, minimizing the need for heavy and power-consuming shielding.

• Wide temperature range: the memory must be able to operate reliably across a vast temperature range, from the cold of deep space to the heat of a nuclear reactor.

• High endurance and retention: the memory must be able to withstand a high number of read and write cycles and retain data for long periods without power.

• Low power consumption: power is a precious resource in space and other remote applications, so the memory must be highly energy efficient.

This SBIR program seeks demonstration of a non-volatile memory device that is resistant to extreme temperatures and radiation as a critical enabler for future advancements in space exploration, nuclear energy, and strategic defense.

The radiation hardened memory should have an operating temperature range of -269°C to 600°C with a density of at least 1Mb, and operating frequency of 10MHz.

Due to the broad and dual-use nature of Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) technologies, security classification and export control requirements vary significantly based on the specific node, fabrication process and intended end-use.

Proposers are solely responsible for determining the appropriate security classification of their proposed effort.

If the memory system makes use of CMOS (i.e. for peripheral control logic), proposers must consider and describe the impacts of relevant DoW Security Classification guides to the proposed work.

PHASE I:

This topic solicits Direct to Phase II (DP2) proposals only.

Proposers must provide data demonstrating that the following has been achieved outside of the SBIR program:

1. Initial hardware demonstration of proposed memory technology.

2. Simulated and/or experimental data that support the feasibility of temperature-hard radiation tolerant memory system capable of meeting SBIR program metrics.

PHASE II:

Phase II will cover the fabrication of temperature-hard and radiation-tolerant non-volatile memory system capable of operating in extreme environments.

Realized designs should incorporate both the non-volatile memory array and necessary peripheral control logic, demonstrating the ability to function reliably across the full -250°C to +600°C temperature envelope.

In addition to meeting the extreme environmental survivability requirements specified, the prototype system should achieve a density of at least 32Mb and maintain an operating frequency of >1MHz.

A packaging and integration report should be included to outline the methods and constraints for co-packaging the extreme-environment memory cells with CMOS or alternative control logic while mitigating thermal and radiation degradation.

As Phase II is focused on fabrication and testing, milestones include interim reports on individual memory cell performance, test plans and initial radiation exposure results as the project proceeds toward final system assembly.

By the end of Phase II, the performers must deliver ten packaged 32Mb memory prototype units meeting the program metrics and a final program report detailing the fabrication process, radiation survivability, and characterization data for delivered prototypes.

All prototypes should be provided with adequate instructions and interface boards to support government testing and evaluation using standard environmental and radiation laboratory equipment.

Fixed payable milestones for this 24-month program should include:

• Month 1: Report detailing program plan and detailed technical design.

• Month 3: Quarterly report describing progress of technical work.

• Month 6: First test chip released to fabrication. The initial test chip can feature test structures or functional device.

• Month 9: Report detailing baseline performance of initial test chip.

• Month 12: Interim report describing progress of technical work, including results of radiation and/or temperature testing of first test chip.

• Month 15: Test plan outlining temperature, radiation and performance characterization of integrated device.

• Month 18: Integrated device released to fabrication.

• Month 21: Report detailing results of radiation, temperature and performance characterization of device addressing program metrics in Table 1.

• Month 24: Final report summarizing design, work undertaken, results, and comparison with alternative state-of-the-art systems; 10 prototype units with interface boards; Test instructions.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

Phase III work is typically oriented towards commercialization of SBIR/STTR research or technology with funding obtained from either the private sector, a non-SBIR/STTR Government source, or both, to develop the technology into a viable product for sale in military or private sector markets.

Given the needs for resilient non-volatile memory technology in space, nuclear and strategic defense technologies, this SBIR has potential dual-use applicability across DoD and commercial entities.

These systems require advanced capabilities with high degrees of reliability given the cost of failure.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Fusion of Abstract Learning and Context-Optimized Neural-methods (FALCON) - SBIR Topic DPA26BZ04-DV016

Funding Amount:

$1,500,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Objective:

The goal of this effort is to combine advanced machine learning (ML) methods that can be computationally efficient in structured data with large language models (LLM) that are general and can extract context from data. The aim is to derive powerful and efficient technology for interactive statistical analysis of large-scale data seen such as in enterprise or battlefield.

Description:

By integrating the contextualization power of LLMs with the statistical power of ML, the program aims to leverage the benefits of both to provide domain-specific statistical contextualization of structured data.

This effort must:

• Survey and research the emerging ML methods suitable for large scale data containing both structured and unstructured data.

• Develop an architecture to combine select ML methods with LLM models.

• Determine a set of metrics that encompass accuracy, new insights, computational efficiency, and ability to generalize across datasets.

• Evaluate the combined architecture and methods in datasets drawn from multiple applications. This may focus on tabular data in enterprise or engineering applications.

• Develop and demonstrate methods to mitigate possible hallucination in the workflow and demonstrate verifiable and reproducible analytic traces.

• Demonstrate interactive analysis by incorporating new insights as they develop during the course of analysis.

PHASE I:

This topic is soliciting Direct to Phase II (DP2) proposals only.

Phase I feasibility should be demonstrated by documenting in the technical proposal the research team’s prior comprehensive research experience on emerging ML methods for structured data.

Proposals must demonstrate the research team understands their functionality, ability to scale, and advantages relative to SOTA ML methods.

Prior research should have been conducted in the last three years.

Reports which provide data, clearly present the analysis done, and provide evidence of scholarly impact will be strongly preferred.

PHASE II:

Identify one or more promising ML methods and develop the software for combining it with one or more available LLMs, preferably open source.

The implementation plan should incorporate an initial demonstration of the analysis functionality (in the first six months), and a plan to scale up to enterprise level data and interactive analysis (at the end of the first year).

The final demonstrations are to be done with at least two datasets from different areas.

The evaluation of the combined method should demonstrate accuracy relative to ground truth as well document the improvement over SOTA methods (ML only, and LLM only).

This Phase should have a parallel effort on the commercialization strategy implementation and a go-to-market plan.

Phase II fixed payable milestones for this program should include:

Base

• Month 1: Kick off and technical report on the ML methods to be implemented.

• Month 3: Quarterly meeting presentation material, including demonstration of progress to date and plans.

• Month 6: Quarterly meeting presentation material, including demonstration of progress to date, plans overall, and an initial demonstration of the analysis functionality.

• Month 11: Phase deliverable to demonstrate ability to scale up to enterprise level data and interactive analysis with at least two datasets from different areas.

• Month 12: Quarterly/Phase meeting presentation material on progress over base year. Phase II Final report and software delivery, with suitable documentation.

Option

• Month 15: Quarterly meeting presentation material, including demonstration of technical and commercialization progress to date and plans.

• Month 18: Quarterly/Phase meeting presentation material on progress over Option. Option Final report and software delivery, with suitable documentation.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

The effort should deliver technology that is quantitatively superior to SOTA methods in both civilian and military sectors.

Modern commercial and scientific applications from business enterprises to biology labs which have structured data along with unstructured text are potential applications.

Military strategic and tactical applications also have to deal with structured tabular data in design and manufacturing as well as in analyzing economic, social, and geographic data.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below:

Art of Novel Signals: Predicting and Forecasting with High Confidence - SBIR Topic DPA26BZ04-DV015

Funding Amount:

$2,000,000

Deadline to Apply:

August 19th, 2026

Objective:

To develop and demonstrate a predictive/forecasting model that leverages Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting using In-Context Learning from novel, multilingual, and multimodal data. The goal is to develop and test a capability that increases the forecasting timeline from days to weeks in advance of an event, while increasing forecasting precision to at least 90%.

Description:

The frontier of predictive AI is running into a data wall: the high-quality open text that has powered recent models is largely exhausted, and the two ways around it both have ceilings. Reusing existing data yields little after a few passes, and synthetic data degrades models once it grows past a curated minority of the mix. Neither route creates a genuinely new signal.

This SBIR idea seeks to break the wall with signal that was never in the training distribution to begin with: multilingual radio, local news, and community reporting from data-sparse regions. This is a large, almost entirely untapped reservoir of high-value, time-sensitive information that the open web never captured and that synthetic generation cannot manufacture. The central bet of this effort is that conflict and instability signal surfaced from this audio, fed into a temporal-knowledge-graph forecasting model, materially improves geopolitical forecasting precision and warning time in exactly the environments where conventional collection is sparse or denied.

The approach has four interlocking parts:

• A radio data engine.

• Per-language automatic speech recognition (ASR) for predominantly oral languages.

• A synthetic-data strategy that could make broad language coverage affordable.

• The forecasting integration that turns transcribed audio into an early warning.

Data

Published scaling work on low-resource ASR (Akera et al., 2025) shows that fine-tuning Whisper Large-v3 (state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition model trained on over 5 million hours of labeled data) reaches usable accuracy at roughly 50 hours of transcribed audio per language and crosses the 10% word-error-rate threshold near 200 hours, with gains flattening beyond that.

For this effort, two adjustments are core areas of importance.

First, those results that were obtained on clean, single-speaker audio; radio is noisy and multi-speaker, so one should expect higher error rates on raw signal and budget for data curation, not just volume.

Second, the 200-hour figure is per language, and the commitment is to be operationally relevant, predominantly oral languages, which are precisely the hardest cases.

The collection uses two complementary methods.

Where stations stream online, the performer will ingest them directly, which extends the reach far beyond the range of any single receiver.

In the low-connectivity environments this program targets, however, many stations never reach the internet at all, and in-region software-defined radio receivers are the only way to capture them.

This is precisely why the physical radio listeners matter.

The audience is not a fallback, but rather a sole means of reaching signal that no online source can carry.

When combined, these two methods make coverage independent of both connectivity and device placement.

The performer will further supplement this audio with local news feeds and community audio from social-media channels (Telegram, WhatsApp, etc.) in the target countries.

Speech is gated to the roughly 15% of transmissions that contain it, draft transcripts are bootstrapped with Whisper Large-v3, and native-speaker annotators (correcting function).

Annotators could be sourced at reasonable costs (around $5/hour) through the performer’s existing in-region network and from diaspora communities; where channels carry human captions, found data further lowers the associated cost.

Proposed benchmark

A two-dimensional benchmark that pairs word-error-rate with hours of training data, reported per language and tagged by acoustic condition, plus a third axis comparing all-real data against real-plus-synthetic mixes.

The headline metric becomes the real transcription hours saved to reach a fixed error rate, which is simultaneously a clean scientific result and a direct cost argument.

Metrics

Across the regions of interest (Central and Southeast Asia, East and Northeast Africa, and South America), the current SOA forecasting precision is approximately 80%, and the novel-signal approach is expected to raise this toward 90%.

Precision alone is an incomplete measure; a model could score high on precision while still missing many true events, so a strong precision figure could overstate the coverage.

As the volume of radio-derived signal grows, the system would gain a more complete picture of the event space, which makes accuracy measurable.

The program therefore begins accuracy measurement once sufficient data has been accumulated and improves against that baseline.

PHASE I:

This topic is soliciting Direct to Phase II (DP2) proposals only.

Performers can bypass Phase I by providing documentation that they have developed a theory for identifying critical knowledge and a framework for testing the theory by determining knowledge requirements and assessing technologies that facilitate multi-modal data ingestion and analyses in complex, real-world settings.

Performers should plan to operationalize and evaluate their frameworks during Phase II.

Proposals will be considered for DP2 funding based on the ability of the proposing team to build a theoretical framework-based forecasting system that leverages novel multilingual, multimodal open-source signal with in-context learning over temporal knowledge graphs to anticipate events in data-sparse environments.

Proposals must clearly demonstrate that the proposed theoretical framework and technology can satisfy the following feasibility criteria:

1. A working in-context-learning forecasting pipeline that operates over temporal knowledge graphs without retraining graph embeddings.

2. Forecast precision at the baseline (days-long) horizon at or above 80% fidelity (metrics validated by an independent team/organization) event-type data such as Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) style political and conflict events.

3. Demonstrate ingestion and normalization of multilingual, multimodal open-source signal, including radio and other audio from data-sparse environments.

4. Demonstrate that the approach generalizes to events and regions not explicitly represented in training.

5. Deployment and evaluation in following strategic regions of interest:

   • Central and Southeast Asia

   • East and Northeast Africa

   • South America

PHASE II:

Phase II fixed milestones for this program should include a Base Period where the performers are expected to produce precision across target regions with a precision of approximately 80%, and the novel-signal approach that would raise this precision level up to 90%, while reducing within-country false-positive rates by roughly half.

Precision alone is an incomplete measure.

However, the model should be able to score high on precision while still missing a large share of true events, so a strong precision figure could overstate real-world coverage.

What this effort really wants to measure is accuracy, but this requires a complete picture of the landscape of the conflict in a region.

As the volume of signal drawn from novel community sources grows, the system gains a more complete picture of the event space, making it possible to measure accuracy and not precision alone.

The base period therefore begins accuracy measurement once sufficient data has accumulated, establishing a baseline that later milestones improve against.

The milestones should include:

Month 3

Milestone:

Stand up radio collection and ingestion for the first languages; begin bootstrap-and-correct annotation; produce initial fine-tuned ASR models and the first word-error-rate-versus-hours curve; establish the forecasting baseline at the current across-region precision.

Month 6

Milestone:

Expand language coverage; begin the real-to-synthetic ratio sweep; demonstrate a 10-day forecasting horizon; reduce within-country false-positive rates by half; begin accuracy measurement to establish a baseline; report ASR ablations isolating the contribution of the radio signal.

Month 9

Milestone:

Demonstrate the two-week horizon; advance across-region precision toward the 90% target; deliver the real-versus-synthetic benchmark; quantify robustness to noise, missing data, and language-coverage gaps.

Month 12

Milestone:

End-to-end demonstration on a live or recent real-world scenario; run the with-versus-without-radio forecasting ablation; show a 30% improvement in accuracy over the Month 6 baseline while holding precision at the 90% target; deliver a mid-program report.

Month 15

Milestone:

Extend the audio model beyond transcription to paralinguistic signal.

Extract prosodic and affective features from broadcast audio, including pitch, energy, speaking rate, and indicators of emotional arousal, valence, and agitation; stand up this feature pipeline across the target languages; and establish a forecasting baseline that combines these features with the textual event stream.

Month 18

Milestone:

Test, by ablation, whether paralinguistic features add early-warning signal beyond the textual events, that is, whether rising fear, anger, or agitation on the air anticipates events the words alone do not; deliver the final base-period report and benchmark suite covering ASR, synthetic stretch, textual-event forecasting, and the paralinguistic contribution.

Option Period (6 Months, $500k)

The primary objective of the option period is to convert the demonstrated capability into operational and contingency value.

Potential directions include:

Operational pilot and transition

Run a sustained, live forecasting feed for a single theater alongside an operational user, measuring real-world warning value over the six months and produce a transition package.

Rapid language onboarding

Demonstrate standing up a new crisis language in weeks rather than the full collection cycle, using cross-lingual transfer and synthetic augmentation, to prove a surge capability for contingencies.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:

The end goal of the Phase II effort is to demonstrate a commercially deployable, validated early-warning forecasting capability built on multilingual signal sourced from data-sparse environments, extending reliable prediction from five days to a two-week horizon at higher precision.

Phase III will be oriented towards transition within DoW/Military ecosystem and further commercialization of the technology.

Funding for Phase III is obtained from the private sector or a non-SBIR/STTR Government source.

This is to develop the prototype technology into a viable product or service for sale (e.g., a deployable, ruggedized, user-friendly device) in military and intelligence community or private sector markets.

The following are the potential commercial and DoW/Military applications and use cases:

• DoW/Military and IC: Indications and warning at the Combatant Command level providing and/or assisting in:

  • Force protection for forward-deployed forces.

  • Embassy and diplomatic personnel.

  • Operational continuity in austere or denied environments.

  • Support to information-environment assessment.

  • Humanitarian assistance and disaster-response planning.

• Commercial:

  • Country and political-risk monitoring for multi-national operators in frontier markets (mining, energy, infrastructure).

  • Operational-continuity and supply-chain risk for banks and insurers.

  • Early warning for Non-Governmental Organizations and humanitarian operations.

Who will win?

If you can achieve the objective above better than any other company on the market, you have a very high-likelihood of success and should apply.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any company that meets the following criteria:

• For-profit company

• U.S.-owned and controlled.

• 500 or fewer employees (including affiliates)

How Can BW&CO Help?

1) End-to-end support including, strategy, writing of the full proposal, and administrative & compliance support.

2) Proposal strategy and review.

3) Administrative & compliance support.

Request to talk with a member of our team by completing the form below: