ERDC BAA - ARMY

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) is issuing a continuously open Broad Agency Announcement to fund basic, applied, and advanced research across a wide range of engineering, environmental, and defense-relevant technology areas. Awards are made on a rolling basis through cooperative agreements, subject to the availability of funds so interested companies should submit as soon as possible.

How much funding would I receive?

ERDC does not specify a standard award size. Individual awards may range from small research efforts to very large, multi-year programs, with an overall program ceiling of $1 billion. Funding levels are determined based on technical scope, relevance, and available funding within the sponsoring ERDC laboratory.

What could I use the funding for?

To be eligible for consideration and possible contract award, the technology or methodology shall be either basic research, applied research, advanced technology development not for a specific system/hardware, or demonstration and validation.

If your technology is novel and fits into one of the following Areas of Interest, you could potentially be funded:

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL)

• Overview

  Research is performed in the areas of hydraulic structures such as locks, dams, outlet works, control gates, stilling basins, spillways, channels, fish handling systems, and pumping stations, flood control channels, navigation channels, riverine and estuarine hydrodynamics and transport processes, groundwater, hydrology; dredgingrelated equipment, and on coastal problems related to coastal storm hazards and risk management, beach erosion, navigation, sedimentation, Regional Sediment Management, inlet stabilization, and construction, operation and maintenance of coastal structures (breakwater, jetties, groins, seawalls, etc.). Major areas of interest include coastal hydrodynamics (wind waves, tides, currents, wind related water levels); coastal sedimentation (longshore transport, inlet sedimentation); coastal geology and geomorphology; design and stability of coastal structures; erosion and storm reduction potential and life-cycle performance of natural and nature-based features; system optimization methods and performance metrics for coastal operations; coastal resiliency; and interaction of structures and coastal processes. Other activities include descriptions of coastal processes; theoretical studies; watershed and regional sediment and water systems studies; numerical and physical model techniques; data collection and analysis techniques; and development of laboratory and prototype instrumentation and equipment. The following sections contain information on these research areas and specific research thrusts.

• A. Physical Processes in Estuaries (CHL-1)

  Research in estuarine physical processes deals with the hydrodynamic and transport characteristics of water bodies located between the sea and the upland limit of tidal effects. Research is directed toward knowledge that will improve field measurements and predictions of these processes. Specific areas of required research include the following physical processes in estuaries and other tidal waters. Specific areas of required research include the following physical processes in estuaries and other tidal waters. a. The propagation of tides. b. Transport of salinity, mixing processes, stratified flows. c. Transport, erosion, and deposition of sediments, including settling velocity, aggregation of sediment, consolidation of sediment. d. Behavior and characteristics of sediment beds, including movement, consolidation, armoring, bonding, physical chemical characteristics, density, erodibility. e. Flow between aquifers and surface waters.

  Specific areas of required research include the following activities with respect to the physical processes listed. a. The effect of human activities, including dredging construction, vessel traffic, flow diversion, training, structures, and protective structures. b. Measurements of parameters that are indicative or descriptive of the processes listed in the 2nd paragraph by in-situ and remote methods in the lab and field. c. Prediction of processes listed in the 2nd paragraph by analytical methods, physical models, numerical models, and other techniques. d. Conceptual and mathematical descriptions of the processes listed in the 2nd paragraph. e. Development of materials, equipment, and methods that potentially lead to applied research that would make human activities listed safer, more economical, or more effective. f. Development of methods, techniques, and procedures that enable the treatment of an estuary as a system.

• B. Inland Hydraulic Structures (CHL-2)

  Research in hydraulic structures is related to the hydraulic performance of locks, dams, outlet works, control gates, stilling basins, spillways, channels, bank protection, riprap stability, pumping plants and other hydraulic structures, and with physical and/or numerical model studies to predict and analyze the physical water quality aspects of water resources projects. Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Conduct physical and numerical hydraulic model investigations of a wide variety of hydraulic structures to verify proposed designs and develop more effective and economical designs. b. Analyze model and prototype data and inspection of field installations to develop design criteria for hydraulic structures. c. Develop methods of correlating theoretical and experimental information with design methods used by the Corps of Engineers to improve existing procedures and provide material for inclusion in appropriate manuals. d. Develop physical and/or numerical models to predict and analyze the water quality aspects of water resources projects and design appropriate hydraulic structures to control water as well as water quantity while satisfying the desired objectives. e. Conduct research and/or develop numerical codes to advance techniques for analyzing physical aspects of water quality in lakes and rivers through a better understanding of the hydrodynamics in density-stratified environments and for improving water quality within and downstream of density-stratified reservoirs and to investigate the ability of existing and proposed water resources projects to satisfy established water quality standards. f. Conduct basic studies for development of hydraulic design and operation guidance for hydraulic structures used in inland waterways for navigation and flood control purposes, including wave forces/loads on gates (tainter, miter, etc.). g. Conduct/analyze tests, both model and prototype, of the performance of hydraulic appurtenances to flood control and navigation dams such as spillways, outlet works, energy dissipaters, and approach and exit channels, to develop design guidance that will provide structures of maximum efficiency and reliability with minimum maintenance. h. Develop innovative methods to prepare and revise engineering manuals for hydraulic design of various hydraulic structures. i. Develop innovative methods to conduct training courses on design of various hydraulic structures. j. Develop innovative methods to prepare technical reports of all work conducted.

• C. Open Channel Flow and Sedimentation (CHL-3)

  Research in open channel flow and sedimentation includes basic studies related to development of hydraulic design guidance for designing modifications to natural stream channels to provide for local flood risk reduction. Emphasis is placed on channel stability as well as channel flow capacity. Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Studies related to the development of effective methods to analyze a natural stream's response to modifications made for flood control purposes. b. Studies applicable to development of stream bank and streambed protection methods where channel instability exists. c. Studies applicable to development of sediment transport, local scour, and stream form relationships for a broad range of stream types, bed and bank materials, and meteorological and hydrological conditions. d. Collection and analysis of data that aid in evaluating existing methods and/or developing new methods to analyze channel stability for the variety of channel flow conditions and stream types existing in natural stream systems.

• D. Dredging Research (CHL-4)

  Protection and enhancement of the environment associated with operation and maintenance of navigable U.S. waterway infrastructure through dredging activities is a national priority. Dredging operations and environmental requirements of navigation projects are inseparable. Research is required to predict the time-dependent movement of non- contaminated sand and sand/silt mixtures of dredged materials placed in the nearshore zone, and all materials placed in the offshore region. The cost of dredging operations attributable to compliance with environmental windows that are determined to be over-restrictive, inconsistent, or technically unjustified can be reduced. More effective contaminated sediment characterization and management will reduce costs and enhance the reliability of methods associated with the assessment, dredging, placement, and control of sediments from navigation projects. Better instrumentation for dredge and site monitoring is required to implement automated dredge inspection and payment methods and accurately monitor placement of contaminated materials. Emerging technologies regarding innovative equipment and processes should be expeditiously introduced into the dredging arena. Enhanced ecological risk management for dredging and disposal projects through technically sound approaches for characterizing, managing, and conducting risk-based evaluations are required for expanding options regarding both contaminated and non-contaminated dredged materials.

• E. Navigation Channel Design (CHL-5)

  Research in navigation channel design involves basic research to develop design guidance for the design of new channels and modifications of existing waterways. It involves identifying maneuvering requirements in restricted waterways that affect the channel dimensions, alignment, and location of appurtenances in the navigation channel under various environmental and vessel traffic conditions. It also involves identifying the stability of the channel, maintenance requirements and designing structures that reduce or eliminate the maintenance requirements. Finally, it involves quantifying the flow and pressure fields generated by a tow or ship passing through a waterway and the related impacts on the sediment resuspension in the channel, channel border, and side channel/backwater areas. Studies involve deep and shallow draft navigation channels and physical and mathematical models. Human factors are included in research and project studies using a ship and tow simulator.

  Specific areas of required research include the following: a. Physical model investigations of a wide variety of navigation channel configurations in many environments with different type vessels to verify proposed designs and to develop more efficient and safe designs and to lower environmental impacts. b. Development and enhancement of mathematical models of vessels, both ships and push-tows, for use on the simulator to add vessel types not available or to increase the accuracy with which the model reproduces the vessels response. c. Development of methods and modeling techniques to predict the currents and sediment transport characteristics of various channel designs and integrate this with the navigation model studies, including those generated by the vessel movement. d. Development of methods and modeling techniques to predict the currents and sediment transport characteristics of various channel designs and integrate this with the navigation model studies. e. Development of methods and techniques to prepare and display visual information for the pilot on the simulator projection system. f. Development of methods and measurement equipment, techniques for measuring scale model performance in physical model navigation studies. g. Development of methods and techniques to improve the ship simulator and increase reliability of design estimates, including data and tools for ship motions, draw down, squat, ship-generated waves, and ship maneuvering. h. Development of methods and techniques for the analysis and evaluation of model results to optimize the channel design and to determine the level of safety, or conversely, risk involved with the various designs and ship transits.

• F. Computer-Aided Hydraulic Engineering (CHL-6)

  Research in this topic area develops computer-aided design tools that can be used by hydraulic engineers in planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of navigation and flood control projects. The scope includes open channel and closed conduit flows, equipment, structures, and sediment transport analysis and modeling.

• G. Groundwater (CHL-7)

  Research in groundwater is structured to enhance understanding and prediction of the flow of water and various transported constituents through the environment, including groundwater issues from contaminant remediation to levee erosion as well as surface water problems from flash flooding to nearshore coastal flows. Primary tools are computer models that solve (approximately) conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy in various physical systems. Work includes developing the numerical methods for solving these equations, writing the computer code to implement the approximations in desktop and high-performance computing environments, and applying the models as part of engineering studies to investigate processes like levee erosion and overtopping, seawater intrusion, and flow through vegetation.

• H. Hydrology (CHL-8)

  Research in this area primarily addresses military applications related to mobility, counter mobility, and water supply. Specific research involves the following areas: a. Large-scale hydrologic modeling. b. Rapid procedures for flood forecasting. c. Groundwater-surface water interaction processes. d. Multi-scale, multi-physics hydrologic modeling. e. Remote sensing and quantification of precipitation. f. Development of spatially varying precipitation hydrology models. g. Visualization of results for hydrology and dam break models. h. Interfacing with existing and new hydrology models. i. Interfacing watershed models with water quality and other environmental models.

• I. H&H GIS/Database Development (CHL-9)

  Research involves the following areas: a. Electronic Navigation Charting. b. Integration of GIS/Database and H&H models. c. Watershed management for erosion control. d. Larger River System management for flood control navigation. e. Visualization Techniques

• J. Coastal Hydrodynamics, Coastal Processes (CHL-10)

  Research in this area includes: shallow water wave estimation; forecasting and hindcasting of wind generated waves for oceanic to local regions; wave theory; statistical distribution of wave parameters; simulation of spectral and phase resolved conditions in wave basins; infragravity (free and bound) waves; nearshore currents; wave breaking; wave/current and wave structure interactions; wave and sediment interactions with natural and nature-based features; long and short waves in ports and harbors; tsunami modeling; wind generated currents; storm surge; tidal circulation; twoand three dimensional numerical simulation models (including finite difference, finite element, finite volume and curvilinear coordinate techniques); coastal meteorology; explosion generated waves; ship response to winds, currents and waves; moored ship response; mooring design and analysis, ribbon bridge hydrodynamics and turbulence.

• K. Coastal Inlets, Navigation Channels (CHL-11)

  Research includes sediment shoaling in coastal inlet channels; stability and performance of inlet channels; scour at structures; sediment transport modeling; influence of structures such as jetties and breakwaters on wave, current, and sedimentation processes. Numerical modeling of inlet hydrodynamics and sedimenttransport processes, including long-term geomorphologic evolution of inlet channels, shoals, and adjacent beaches, and the interaction with navigation structures. Nearshore placement of dredged sediment to foster wave reduction and sediment supply to adjacent beaches. Short- and long-term dune evolution in vicinity of coastal inlets. Shoreline evolution modeling and storm erosion of beaches, particularly concerning over wash and breaching near inlets; wind and wave generated sediment transport; sediment budget analysis; coastal and inlet geomorphology; and PC-, workstation-, and mainframe-based automated coastal engineering software (including relational and GIS data bases)

• L. Coastal Structure and Facility Design (CHL-12)

  Research includes development of functional and stability design criteria for coastal structures and facilities (breakwaters, seawalls, jetties, groins, harbors, marinas, etc.); wave run-up, over-topping, refraction, diffraction, transmission, reflection, etc.; design of floating breakwaters; breakwater stability; application of spectral wave conditions to coastal engineering; stability of riprap to irregular wave attack; stability and functional design of overtopped rubble mound breakwaters; scale modeling of armor unit strength; analysis of structural data for floating breakwaters; investigation of numerical structural models for floating breakwaters; development of wave run-up gage for rough and porous slopes; investigation of attenuation/mooring force models of floating breakwaters; development of materials and techniques to produce high quality breakwater model armor units; analysis of wave run-up overtopping, refraction, diffraction, transmission and/or reflection data on coastal structures and beaches and design of structures for Logistics-Over-The-Shore (LOTS) operations.

• M. Field and Laboratory Measurements, Data Collection, and Analysis (CHL13)

  This topic area includes research in technologies, instrumentation, and monitoring systems in coastal and riverine settings for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating data related to measurements of coastal waves, surface currents, water levels, water quality, sediment, and wind, primarily in the field, but also in a sediment laboratory; advanced data analysis (spectral and non-spectral) techniques; remote sensing techniques; bedload and suspended sediment transport; monitoring and evaluating technical and structural stability of coastal projects; advanced hydrographic survey techniques, field measurement of coastal processes; bathymetric survey systems.

• N. Experimental Coastal Model Equipment, Operation and Analysis (CHL-14)

  Research includes development of equipment and techniques for specialized model construction, experimental wave generation equipment, specialized data acquisition and analysis systems, advanced model operations techniques, and laboratory and scale effects in movable bed model studies.

• O. General Coastal Engineering, Coastal Geology, Dredging Investigations CHL-15)

  This topic area includes topics such as sand bypassing systems and equipment; beach fill design; coastal geology and geomorphology; functional design and evaluation of coastal works and coastal structures; methodologies to assess and track coastal resilience performance; littoral transport; coastal and offshore dredging studies; agitation dredging systems and equipment; physical monitoring of dredged material; physical processes in coastal wetlands; application of Geographic Information Systems; design of nearshore and offshore dredged material placement; evaluation of dredged material disposal sites; analysis of dredging operations management.

• P. Regional and Watershed Sediment Management (CHL-16)

  Regional Sediment Management (RSM) research is intended to provide knowledge and tools that the Corps and the Nation need for effective water resource projects. RSM implies the holistic management of sediment within systems or regions to produce environmentally and economically sustainable projects. Goals include improved project design, operation, and maintenance methods, minimized disruption of natural sediment pathways and processes, and mediation of natural processes that have adverse environmental or economic impact. The approach of the Corps research is to produce targeted R&D serving multiple Corps business areas; to employ ongoing projects’ experience (including Demonstration Projects) to provide data and lessons learned; to use enabling technologies of localscale products and tools, including those generated by other R&D programs within and outside the Corps; to generate technologies that integrate the best available knowledge on sediment behavior and regional morphology into management decision support tools for a) regional and basin scale analyses and b) evaluation of the impacts of projects and management decisions on and by long-term, large-scale sedimentation processes. A key element in ERDC research is full coordination with other organizations with sediment management or monitoring expertise.

• Q. Marine Transportation Technologies (CHL-17)

  Research in this topic area serves one of the USACE’s primary missions, to provide safe, reliable, efficient, effective, and environmentally sustainable waterborne transportation systems for movement of commerce, national security needs, and recreation. To accomplish this mission, the USACE requires R&D to facilitate tracking of vessels on inland waterways (shallow draft) and coastal ports (deep draft). Knowing what vessels are arriving, when, the commodities being carried, etc., will provide lock operators and operations project managers valuable tools to improve safety, efficiency, asset management, and help to make decisions on performance-based funding for navigation project maintenance and improvements. Work in this area focuses on software that uses the United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) Automated Identification Systems (AIS) vessel mounted transmitters which broadcasts a radio signal with the vessels name, position, heading, velocity, and a wide range of other information. Proposals are sought for developing the following: a. Capability that will take the full suite of standard CG AIS messages and provide them in near real time to the Corps facilities in the immediate area of the vessel. b. Capability to allow collection of the full suite of standard AIS messages simultaneously at all pertinent Corps Inland and Deep Draft facilities. c. Capability to customize user interface to allow the Corps operations staff to view vessels in the vicinity of the Corps facilities to make decisions on the order in which to allow commercial tows to pass through lock. d. Provide the capability for Corps facilities to transmit pertinent information to the vessels in the immediate vicinity of the Corps facilities via AIS. e. System optimization methods and performance metrics for vessel operations. Special Considerations: The level of understanding of AIS technology and signal processing, the number of successful installations of similar AIS software processing capabilities; experience with USCG staff, facilities, regulations, and procedures.

• R. Post-Wildfire Hydrologic, Sediment, and Geomorphologic Management (CHL-18)

  Post-Wildfire research is focused on improving understanding of post-fire impacts through exploitation of affordable data acquisition methods and enhancement of numerical modeling capabilities to assist with planning, management, and mitigation in post-wildfire environments. Immediately following a wildfire, vegetation is removed, organic soil horizons are reduced to ash, and hydrophobic soils combine to result in increased water and sediment discharge and debris, mud, and hyper concentrated flows. In the years following a wildfire, ecotone shifts, gully formation, and channel incision alter the hydrologic system response, resulting in dramatic changes in hydraulic and sediment impacts down system. Wildfires represent a significant perturbation to natural systems that dramatically alter the morphologic, hydrologic, and sediment regimes of impacted watersheds. The overall purpose of this area of research and development is to investigate post-wildfire impacts on hydrologic and hydraulic response, geomorphic evolution, and sedimentation, with specific research needed in the following areas: a. Studies related to cost-effective (in situ and remotely sensed) data acquisition and processing methods. b. Studies related to better understanding the longer-term geomorphic impacts and subsequent recovery processes in post-fire environments. c. Studies related to hydrological physical processes, empirical approaches, and numerical modeling. d. Studies related to hydraulics and sediment transport physical processes and numerical modeling.

• S. Nearshore Coastal Research in Support of the U.S. Coastal Research Program (CHL- 19)

  Proposals are invited to address nearshore coastal research needs within three broad research themes as identified by the U.S. Coastal Research Program (USCRP) (see Nearshore Process Community, 2015 for more details). Nearshore systems include the complex interactions of physical, biological, chemical, and human influences within the transition region across the land and the continental shelf, spanning (from onshore to offshore) coastal plains, wetlands, estuaries, coastal cliffs, dunes, beaches, surf zones, and the inner shelf. Worldwide, nearly 1 billion people live at elevations within 10 m of present sea level, an elevation zone in need of engineering solutions that reduce risks to life and property produced by various extreme events. The nearshore is a societally relevant region that requires and improved understanding of the feedbacks and couplings that shape, sustain, and alter coastal landscapes. The three broad research themes include a need to understand, better predict, and respond to (1) Long-term coastal evolution due to natural and anthropogenic processes; (2) Extreme Events including: flooding, erosion, and the subsequent recovery; and (3) The physical biological and chemical processes impacting human and ecosystem health. Each is detailed below a. Long-term coastal evolution due to natural and anthropogenic processes: As storms impact increasingly urbanized coastal communities, an understanding of long-term coastal evolution is critical. Improved knowledge of long-term morphological, ecological, and societal processes and their interactions will result in an improved ability to simulate coastal change and develop proactive solutions for resilient coasts and better guidance for reducing coastal vulnerability. b. Extreme Events including flooding, erosion, and the subsequent recovery: U.S. coastal extreme event related economic losses have increased substantially over the past decades. Addressing this research theme will result in an improved understanding of the physical processes during extreme events, leading to improved models of flooding, erosion, and recovery. Utilization and application of the improved models will produce societal benefit in the form of more resilient coastal communities. c. The physical, biological, and chemical processes impacting human and ecosystem health: Nearshore regions are used for recreation, tourism, human habitation, and provide habitat and valuable ecosystem services. These areas must be sustained for future generations, however overall coastal water quality is declining due to microbial pathogens, fertilizers, pesticides, and heavy metal contamination, threatening ecosystem and human health. To ensure sustainable nearshore regions, predictive real-time water- and sediment-based pollutant modeling capabilities must be developed, which requires expanding our knowledge of the physics, chemistry, and biology of the nearshore. The resulting societal benefits will include better beach safety, healthier ecosystems, and improved mitigation and regulatory policies.

• T. Comprehensive Water Risk Management (CWRM) (CHL- 20)

  Proposals are invited to develop and explore the application of next generation technologies, methods and approaches that lead to the creation of a seamless national hydro-terrestrial capability within the USACE and partner agencies. CWRM includes advanced data collection, prediction and management technologies that can provide water managers the tools required to minimize, mitigate, and better manage water hazards under present and future design requirements. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are needed: a. Inland and Coastal Compound Flooding: Research to support the inclusion of inland and coastal compound flooding in the reduction of comprehensive flood risk from riverine flows, precipitation, coastal storms, groundwater emergence, sea level change, snowmelt, wildfires, subsidence, and other natural as well as anthropogenic events. b. Data Collection: Research to support the collection and analysis of water data through in-situ and standoff measurements including satellite, and various uncrewed systems (UxS). For UxS this includes sensing, perception, control, and data process techniques. Needs include data collection techniques for snowpack analysis, soil-moisture determination, wave environment, estimation of under-water bathymetry, reservoir capacity, etc. c. Probabilistic Modeling – Uncertainty quantification and Data Assimilation: Research to support development of methodology for quantifying numerical uncertainty and forward propagation of that uncertainty into numerical prediction. Additionally, research to develop methods for assimilating observations into probabilistic numerical methods to refine predictions for wave, circulation, and morphologic models. d. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) Technologies: Research to support the use AI/ML technologies to increase the accuracy and efficiency of hydrologic and hydraulic numerical models. Capabilities include advanced data assimilation technologies for error reduction and longer forecasts. e. Flash Flooding: Research to improve the technologies to predict and mitigate water hazards due to flash flooding. Research requirements include downscaling of weather forecasts including precipitation, wind speeds, atmospheric pressure, etc. f. Cold Weather Water Hazards: Research to improve the performance of predictive techniques in cold regions including the arctic. Research requirements include the effects of ice cover on wave and storm mitigation, the effects of the permafrost on hydrologic processes, the effects of flood risk mitigation features on freshwater sources, etc. g. Arid Region Water Hazards: Research to improve the performance of predictive techniques in arid regions. Research requirements include infiltration processes, groundwater and surface water interaction, aquifer recharge, wildfire hydrology, etc. h. Numerical Model Coupling Techniques: Research to improve the performance of numerical model coupling methods. Research requirements include inter and intra-model communication for inter-agency model collaboration.

• U. Innovations in Sediment Management (CHL- 21)

  Proposals are invited to develop leap-ahead innovative and sustainable dredging and sediment management solutions to dramatically reduce costs, increase channel/infrastructure reliability, and add significant economic, environmental, and social value to the Nation. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are requested: a. Coastal/ Hydrodynamic Engineering Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) and Hybrid Solutions: Research to inform the development of tools, techniques and guidance behind designing and engineering nature-based solutions (NBS) and hybrid solutions. This R&D will help in the development of methods and standards which support effective planning, designing, construction, and O&M of NBS/hybrid solutions to support the reduction of coastal and inland flooding risks. This research should focus on exploring the potential for integrating NBS/hybrid solutions within existing hydrodynamic engineering and land use planning practices. b. Innovative Dredging Technologies/ Autonomous Methods: Research to develop technologies and techniques for improved dredging operations. R&D can address evaluating next-generation technologies and dredging operations (e.g., hydrodynamic dredging), real-time dredge position and bottom mapping techniques, autonomous dredging to reduce costs, increase beneficial use of dredged material, sediment transfer and placement equipment to facilitate more beneficial uses (e.g., thin layer placement, strategic placement), reduce channel and reservoir infilling to reduce dredging need, or renewing reservoir capacity through application of technologies developed for navigation channel maintenance. Proposals are invited to develop leap-ahead innovative and sustainable dredging and sediment management solutions to dramatically reduce costs, increase channel/infrastructure reliability, and add significant economic, environmental, and social value to the Nation. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are requested: a. Coastal/ Hydrodynamic Engineering Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) and Hybrid Solutions: Research to inform the development of tools, techniques and guidance behind designing and engineering nature-based solutions (NBS) and hybrid solutions. This R&D will help in the development of methods and standards which support effective planning, designing, construction, and O&M of NBS/hybrid solutions to support the reduction of coastal and inland flooding risks. This research should focus on exploring the potential for integrating NBS/hybrid solutions within existing hydrodynamic engineering and land use planning practices. b. Innovative Dredging Technologies/ Autonomous Methods: Research to develop technologies and techniques for improved dredging operations. R&D can address evaluating next-generation technologies and dredging operations (e.g., hydrodynamic dredging), real-time dredge position and bottom mapping techniques, autonomous dredging to reduce costs, increase beneficial use of dredged material, sediment transfer and placement equipment to facilitate more beneficial uses (e.g., thin layer placement, strategic placement), reduce channel and reservoir infilling to reduce dredging need, or renewing reservoir capacity through application of technologies developed for navigation channel maintenance. c. Hydrodynamic and Geomorphologic Response of Biomaterials: Research into the use of bio-based materials, such as biopolymers, to enhance and increase the resiliency of NBS, including earthen levees, coastal dunes, and dam embankments. This research should focus on the hydrodynamic and geomorphologic response of biomaterials to the impacts of hydrological and meteorological extremes. Considering the performance and sustainability of biobased materials, we seek to understand the potential of bio-based materials to reduce the risk and cost of rehabilitating and maintaining these structures and increase their resiliency against potential threats. We invite research that furthers our understanding and application of bio-based materials for this purpose, as a component of comprehensive water risk management and abilities to adapt to dynamic environmental forcing requirements. The research should be designed to provide evidence and support decision making. It should be based on research available at existing open-source platforms, or data that is proposed to be collected for the research. d. Monitoring of NBS and Beneficial Use of Dredged Sediment Projects: Research to improve the understanding of the performance of NBS and beneficial use of dredged sediment projects through monitoring. Monitoring could include the project’s response to storm events and the post-storm recovery. Monitoring techniques will vary based on the project but may be comprised of satellite data, remote sensing measurements, in-situ measurements, or engaging the public to crowdsource data collection. The monitoring research may also include the development or testing of innovative sensors or monitoring techniques.

• V. Next Generation Water Management (CHL-22)

  Proposals are invited to explore the application of next generation technologies, methods and approaches that are aimed at improving water management practice within the USACE and partner agencies, including efforts that support research, development and implementation of capabilities to support Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO). FIRO is a management approach that seeks to improve water supply, enhance flood risk reduction and achieve additional ecosystem benefits through application of advanced weather and watershed forecast capabilities in water management practice.

  FIRO envisions advanced observation and prediction technology that can provide water managers more lead time to selectively retain or release water from reservoirs based on longer- term forecasts. When storms cause moderate-to-high reservoir levels, normal operation is to release water to re-establish flood control space. FIRO pilot studies have demonstrated that some of that water can be retained for future supply as long as no major precipitation is expected and it can be shown that the retained water can be released past downstream flood prone areas prior to the arrival of the next storm. This strategy permits earlier supply capture in some years, improving supply reliability for downstream water users and improving the timing and volume of releases to protect water quality and provide flows needed for ecosystem benefits. Proposals for research in the following specific areas are needed: a. Improvement of forecast skill to support advanced water management, including meteorological phenomena that are major drivers for floods in various regions across the country including atmospheric rivers, tropical storms/hurricanes, clusters of long-lived thunderstorms and Nor’Easters. This can also include improvements in weather observations and numerical weather forecasting models that result in improved forecasting lead times for water management decision-making.

  b. Improvements in data synthesis, decision support systems and data visualization capabilities to enhance water management decision-making.

  c. Hydrologic and reservoir model development and application, including improvements in watershed monitoring to enhance hydrologic and reservoir models.

  d. Application of FIRO screening process tools to regions of the United States where FIRO has not previously been applied or tested.

  e. Application of FIRO viability assessment processes to systems of dams where multiple dams are operated within a watershed to achieve overall system water management objectives.

  f. Research to support updates to USACE Water Control Manuals (WCMs) using FIRO approaches, scenarios and principles. Updates to WCMs require numerous studies in areas of meteorology, hydrology, hydraulics, ecology and economics. Incorporation of next generation approaches such as FIRO require research efforts to identify best management practices on how to safely and effectively incorporate these new approaches into water management practice as defined in WCMs.

Geotechnical & Structures Laboratory (CHL)

• Overview

  Research performed by the Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory’s (GSL) eight branches consists of investigations in the areas of soil mechanics, engineering geology, geophysics and seismology, earthquake engineering, pavements (both expedient and permanent), mobility and traffic ability of military vehicles, structural design and performance of structures under both static and dynamic loadings, earth dynamics, and the uses and performance of concrete, cement, and other construction materials. Research areas also include measurement and analysis of seismic and acoustic signals to locate airborne and ground military targets and buried objects (including unexploded ordnance) and to characterize earth media. Research on concrete and cement is predominantly related to current recognized needs, both civil and military. Military expediency focuses additional attention on ease and speed of concrete placement, development of very high-strength materials, and use of non-traditional, indigenous, and other special materials in concrete construction. Civil works research focuses primarily on the need to improve the performance of both new and old concrete structures. Structures research involves development, testing, and evaluation of a broad class of structures to resist the effects of static and dynamic loads induced by earthquakes and other sources. The Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory also conducts research involving all aspects for improving the survivability of fixed installations.

• A. Earthquake Engineering (GSL-1)

  Research areas of interest include the dynamic behavior of soil and rock; liquefaction of soils, including coarse-grained and fine-grained soils; in-situ testing to evaluate properties related to dynamic behavior; centrifuge scale-model testing using a multi-waveform shake table; in-situ testing to evaluate susceptibility to liquefaction; methods of analysis of dynamic behavior of earth materials; methods of analysis of dynamic soil- structure interaction; risk-based and probability-based methods of analysis; seismic wave propagation in earth materials; seismically induced settlements in soils and remedial treatment of soils potentially susceptible to earthquake-induced instability or strength loss; computer visualization and dynamic simulation; site response analysis; and strong motion instrumentation.

• B. Geophysics (GSL-2)

  ERDC supports research in the development of land, air, or waterborne geophysical methods to be used for characterization of hazardous waste sites, detection and monitoring of seepage, nondestructive investigation of archeological sites, location of groundwater, and detection of buried objects; analytical and data-processing techniques, borehole surveys, cross hole seismic imaging, electromagnetic detection of anomalies, seismic surveys, sub bottom profiling, and acoustic impedance surveys; and uses of microgravity.

• C. Mobility of Vehicles (GSL-3)

  The Mobility Systems Branch addresses engineering research on the performance of vehicles operating cross country and on-road, and/or in negotiating dry and wet obstacles in worldwide terrains. This is a highly specialized technical area involving engineering mechanics, vehicle dynamics, mathematics, statistics, computer specialties, geology, and soil mechanics. Research in this area includes developing fundamental relations between soil and vehicle running gear; improving criteria concerning the effects of vehicle vibration and ride shock on sensors and data streams from rapidly moving sensors over rough terrain; developing algorithms describing weather effects on terrain, multi-vehicle movements along road nets, stochastic processes describing influence of uncertainties of data elements, and developing modeling and simulation capabilities for near real-time assessments of mobility and counter mobility for battlefield operations and operations other than war.

• D. Pavement Technology (GSL-4)

  Research in this area is conducted in support of the Corps mission to design and construct roads and airfields worldwide and other related engineering functions. This research includes the development of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of permanent and expedient airfields, pavements, and ports. Research areas of interest include improved design procedures, structural performance modeling, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair of structures, expedient surfacing (to include novel, composite, and metallic systems), aircraft and vehicular ground flotation, access/egress systems, gravel surfaced and non-surfaced areas, the use of geotextiles and geomembranes, grid-confining systems, soil stabilization, dust-control materials and techniques, advanced binder systems, remote assessment, earth anchoring, pavement evaluation, and advanced testing, monitoring, and evaluation equipment, software, and methods to support pavement and pavement related functions.

• E. Soil and Rock Mechanics (GSL-5)

  Research is needed to: (a) improve methods for prediction and control of erosion of unlined spillway channels during uncontrolled releases; (b) develop innovative methods for flood protection and flood fighting, including field evaluations of promising technologies; (c) develop guidance for applications of trenchless technology (e.g., micro tunneling, horizontal directional drilling, pipe ramming, pipe jacking, auger boring, etc.) on Corps structures, including measures to ensure safety and stability of Corps structures when trenchless technology is used to install pipelines, cables, or conduits through or beneath levees and other structures;(d) develop improved methods, including risk-based methods for analyzing earth and rock fill dams and other water control structures for both static- and earthquake-induced stresses; (e) improve the state of knowledge of physical and engineering properties of soil, rock, and clay shales; earth-rock mixtures, granular filters, cohesive and non-cohesive fine- grained soils susceptible to liquefaction; and soils susceptible to drastic volume changes (collapse, consolidation, swell); (f) develop rational analytical procedures and more reliable prediction of behavior of partially saturated soils; (g) determine the response of soils in situ to static and dynamic loading and unloading; (h) determine the susceptibility of earth dams to cracking, hydraulic fracturing, and internal erosion; (i) evaluate improved defensive design measures in use of materials, particularly in filter and transition zones and impervious barriers; (j) improve procedures for monitoring and analysis of the performance of new and existing structures, particularly the use and interpretation of observations and data from specialized instrumentation, and expedient systems for rapid inspection and evaluation of the integrity of dams; (k) improve the understanding of the aging processes in dams and the influence of aging (particularly deterioration of safety-related features) on long-term maintenance and/or rehabilitation requirements for dams; (l) develop a better understanding of failure mechanisms to improve design of defensive measures, to provide information for remedial repairs, to assess potential damages resulting from failure, and to provide a basis for emergency actions; (m) develop expedient remedial measures when hazardous conditions are identified and, thus, reduce the damages and catastrophic potential of dam failures; (n) develop methodology to evaluate forces exerted on structural elements by adjacent soil masses that result from long- term variation in soil properties; (o) develop improved methodology for design and construction procedures for shallow and deep foundations, including mats, footings, piers, and piles for buildings, hydraulic structures and waterfront structures; (p) large-scale physical and numerical modeling of deep underground structures (tunnels, shafts, chambers, and intersections); (q) predictions of rock mass dredgability; (r) acoustic emission (micro-seismic) applications in geotechnical engineering; (s) geotechnical aspects of hazardous and low-level radioactive waste disposal; (t) evaluation of rock for use as riprap; (u) grouting of soil and rock masses; (v) sliding stability of gravity structures, and (w) centrifuge modeling of structures founded on or in rock.

• F. Dam Research (GSL-6)

  Research is conducted in support of the Army’s Dams and Transportation Infrastructure Program, specifically the Dam Safety subcomponents. Research covers design, construction, maintenance, repair, and inspection procedures of Army dams as well as other engineering functions as they relate to transportation structures. This involves the formulation of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of dams. Research areas of interest include improved inspection procedures, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair, scour, unknown material properties, unknown foundations, and underwater inspection.

• G. Engineering Geology (GSL-7)

  The GSL conducts a broad range of research in the field of engineering geology in support of federal or other Government technical missions. Specific areas of interest within this field include application of remote sensing to geologic and geomorphic assessments; geo-archeological investigations; applied and numerical geomorphic analysis; computer applications in geotechnical engineering; 3-D visualization systems; uses of geographic information systems; geo hydrology in military and civil applications; including water quality and supply issues; geologic mapping; geologic applications of mathematical techniques and geo statistics; groundwater monitoring, including well installation and design; geologic application of groundwater models; integration of geological and geophysical subsurface exploration techniques; land-loss studies; remedial measures at groundwater contamination sites; seismic hazard characterization and evaluation; subsurface exploration methods (drilling and sampling techniques); test site selection; conceptual and geologic and hydro geologic models.

• H. Excavation, Structural Demolition, and Obstacle Creation (GSL-8)

  Current criteria for improved demolitions call for significantly reduced manning levels and preparation times to accomplish assigned missions. Cost effectiveness, versatility, and safety are also of great importance. Current efforts involve technologies for the standoff creation and reduction of all types of battlefield obstacles, and the excavation of fighting positions. A prime consideration is the development of more efficient means for the application of various types of energetic materials to targets of interest. In addition, modern materials and design principles used in typical target structures must be incorporated into future plans and guidelines for demolitions. Typical missions of interest are road cratering, anti-tank ditching, bridge and tunnel demolition, and the breaching of walls, bunkers, levees, and dams.

• I. Ammunition Storage Safety (GSL-9)

  The military services must store large amounts of munitions, both for war reserves and for training purposes. New conceptual designs for components or systems for storage are needed to reduce the likelihood of an accidental detonation of stored munitions, limit the propagation of air blast and fragments, or mitigate the safety hazards produced by an accidental detonation. In addition, test data and simulation techniques are needed to aid in the definition of the safety hazards from such detonations, and the mechanics of blast propagation among munition stores. Obsolete munitions are often disposed of by deliberate, controlled detonation. Research is needed on new methods for safe, efficient, and environmentally acceptable methods for deactivation of a wide variety of munition types.

• J. Physical Simulation of Munition Phenomenology (GSL-10)

  The mechanical effects induced by munition detonations are physically simulated using a variety of energy sources. Simulations are performed at full- and small (1/2 to 1/10) scale. The mechanical effects from conventional energetic materials are normally performed at small scale. These studies could benefit from improved (better fidelity, less expensive) simulators and simulation techniques. They could also enhance the development of test methodology for micro-scale (1/100 to 1/10) testing including centrifuge testing. Micro-scale test methodology includes the miniature high- fidelity energy sources, miniature sensors, advanced optical techniques, high-fidelity construction techniques for miniature structures, and theoretical developments in the scaling of material behavior.

• K. Geophysical Phenomenology - Multi-Modal Geophysical Phenomenology, Modeling, Data Processing, and Data Management (GSL-11)

  The objectives include detecting, classifying, and locating airborne and ground military targets and buried objects using geophysical methods for homeland defense and homeland security applications. Also included are invasive and non-invasive approaches for measuring and quantifying the geophysical/geologic signatures of diverse geo-environments. This can include the development of new and/or improved analytical and numerical models, rapid data- processing techniques, and new subsurface imaging techniques that include active and passive sensor modalities in a variety of rural and urban terrains.

  Of particular interest is the broadband propagation of energy including, but not limited to seismic/acoustic/infrasonic/electromagnetic/ thermal/chemical, under variable conditions using a variety of sensing platforms (fixed, mobile, airborne, space). The development of new tactics, techniques, and procedures for the employment of novel sensing methods as well as the development and/or verification of empirical testing and evaluation techniques is also desirable. Data management and multi-mode integration techniques and platforms are also of interest.

• L. Laboratory Tests and Constitutive Model Development for Geologic Materials (GSL-12)

  This research requires the formulation of mathematical constitutive models to simulate the mechanical behavior of geological and structural materials and incorporation of models into application-oriented prediction/analysis techniques. Also of interest are the development of dynamic test equipment and techniques and the experimental evaluation of geological and structural material response to high-pressure transient loadings.

• M. Projectile Penetration (GSL-13)

  Theoretical and experimental studies of projectile stresses and trajectories due to impact and penetration into geologic and man-made targets and development of design criteria for shield systems include development of equipment and diagnostic techniques to examine the response of targets to low- and high-velocity impact of penetrators, rods, etc.

• N. Computational Structural Mechanics for DOD Applications (GSL-14)

  The efficient use of scalable computers will require fundamentally new concepts in computational mechanics algorithms. Research includes mathematical formulations and development of scalable computational mechanics algorithms in the areas of structural response, penetration, contact impact, structure-medium interaction, multi-scale, multi-physics, and interdisciplinary flow-thermal-structural interactions. This research area also includes development of computational models for new materials and composite construction (consisting of concrete, composite, and/or geologic materials), as well as the behavior and control of structures composed of such composite construction for military applications.

• O. Concrete Materials (GSL-15)

  Research in this area includes improving the performance of concrete materials and systems. Performance could include very high tensile or compressive strength, high ductility, high fracture toughness, low shrinkage, rapid hardening, very low permeability, resistance to abrasion and erosion durability, chemical resistance, shock-attenuating properties, ultra-low density, thermal insulation properties, workability, and other unique attributes. This includes improvements in the materials typically used in a concrete mixture such as aggregate, cement, supplementary cementitious materials, and chemical admixtures. Aggregates could include waste and/or manmade materials such as fly ash (traditional, blended, or reclaimed), silica fume, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, recycled concrete, lightweight aggregates other potentially low cost and/or green materials. Micro- and Nanoscale aggregates, inclusions, pozzolans, cements and reinforcements such as microspheres, nanosilicates, microfibers and low-cost nanotubes or nanofibers would also be included in this research area. Chemical admixtures such as water reducers, set retarders, set accelerators, air-entraining admixtures, and foaming and defoaming agents that lend unique properties would also be considered in this research area. Since reinforcement is a critical element to the ductility and durability of concrete materials, advanced reinforcement materials that enhance these properties fall under this research area. Additionally, this topic area would include research involving nontraditional cement binders including polymer- impregnated concrete, polymer or resin concrete, polymer Portland-cement concrete and geopolymer concretes.

• P. Concrete Properties and Analysis (GSL-16)

  Research in this area if focused on the development of new nondestructive and destructive test methods and analysis techniques to better characterize the properties and performance of concretes and the constituents that they are composed of at scales ranging from the nano-level to the macro-level. There are a vast number of topics in testing and analysis that could be included in this area as related to the physical and chemical properties of aggregates, cements, pozzolans, admixtures, fibers, and their interaction during the mixing, placing, curing, and service phases of a concrete. This could include but is not limited to: 1. Developing test methods and analysis techniques to better quantify material properties at aggregate-paste and fiber-paste transition zones.

  2. Developing tools, test methods and analysis techniques to non-destructively define the spatial distribution of components in a concrete specimen.

  3. Developing better assessment tools and criteria for predicting durability and longevity of concrete and grout.

  4. Developing better methods to define and classify chemical admixtures by chemical composition and mechanism of performance.

  5. Developing innovative systems to construct concrete materials and structures more economically.

  6. Developing theoretical, computational, and experimental methods for effectively characterizing stress, strain, progressive damage, and fracture of engineering materials subjected to static and dynamic loads.

• Q. Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Concrete (GSL-17)

  Forensic analyses such as assessment of remaining life, maintenance and minor remedial measures, repair and rehabilitation, and surveillance and monitoring are topics of interest. Structures of interest include concrete locks and dams and appurtenant concrete and steel structures (outlet works, retaining walls, gates, piles, bulkheads, tunnels, intakes, etc.), other horizontal and vertical concrete infrastructure, and metals and polymer systems related to those concrete components.

• R. Other Areas of Materials Research (GSL-18)

  Research is needed in the development, properties, and performance of a range of materials for military and civil applications. Needed materials research for concrete applications includes such materials as: curing compounds, coatings, and overlays; polymers or other agents for improving bond between old and new concrete; water stop materials for use in hydraulic structures, and methods for characterizing and testing such materials; grouts for injection underground in very fine fracture systems or porous media; organic and inorganic composites that are used in construction; and grout materials and technologies for waste-disposal and containment such as for both commercial and defense-related low-level and high-level radioactive wastes.

  Other materials research needs include the development, testing, and prototyping of metals, composites, or other novel materials exhibiting advanced mechanical, thermal, rheological, chemical, electrical, and multi-functional properties, and performances. Research is performed on energy absorbing materials for impact, ballistic and blast resistance; hierarchical, multi- layered, and functionally graded material systems; multi-scale reinforcement for macro performance; self-sensing and self-healing materials; and materials demonstrating advancements in durability, high strength-to-weight, fatigue resistance, and ease of application.

• S. Bridge Research (GSL-19)

  Research is conducted in support of the Army’s Dams and Transportation Infrastructure Program, specifically the Bridge Safety and Waterfront Facilities subcomponents. Research covers design, construction, maintenance, repair and inspection procedures of Army bridges and waterfront facilities worldwide as well as other engineering functions as they relate to transportation structures. This involves the formulation of engineering criteria for the design, construction, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of permanent and expedient bridge and port facilities. Research areas of interest include improved inspection procedures, material characterization and evaluation, nondestructive testing, rapid repair, scour, unknown material properties, unknown foundations, traffic safety, underwater inspection, fracture critical and fatigue evaluations, load capacity, load testing, and load ratings.

• T. Structures Research (Civil Works) (GSL-20)

  Research is conducted in assessing the performance of critical structures to extreme loads, such as those resulting from seismic, terrorist attack, and storm events, as well as the effects of flow-induced vibrations. Efforts include assessing sensitivity of structural design and analysis procedures, vulnerability of structures, and critical design parameters to develop appropriate load-resistance factors. Techniques for retrofit, including use of new and innovative materials, of structures to resist extreme loads is of interest. Also, a better understanding of long-term behavior and deterioration of civil structures is needed, including factors such as material interactions, thermal stresses, and any issues affecting design of new structures and operation and maintenance of existing structures.

  Nonlinear and linear system identification research includes vibration testing, data acquisition, data processing, and analysis techniques for determining linear and nonlinear dynamic and static response properties of structures and structural systems subjected to earthquakes, blast effects from mining (or other) operations, other transient random, harmonic dynamic loads, and static or pseudo static loads.

• U. Structures Research (Military) (GSL-21)

  1. Research is needed on the response of aboveground and shallow-buried structures subjected to military dynamic loads; specifically, the prediction of the load and response to failure of aboveground and shallow-buried structures. This effort will involve the following research:

  a. Development of techniques to simulate military dynamic loads on aboveground and mounded structures.

  b. Development of design procedures for components in semihardened and protected facilities.

  c. Analysis of structural loading and damage resulting from internal or external detonations.

  d. Development of fast-running models for PC based applications to predict the response of structures, both hardened and unhardened, to single and multiple explosive detonations.

  2. Research on deeply based structures and hardened existing systems involving the following:

  a. Development of comprehensive structural design for deeply buried and surface-buried structures subjected to air blast-induced and direct-induced ground shock from surface and shallow earth-penetrating high-energy sources.

  b. Formulation of computer models for SSI and pre- and post-test analysis of structural response to include correlation and comparison with experimental data.

  3. Research on surveillance and intrusion detection sensors involves the constraints of the environment on sensor systems used to detect intruders and placed along the perimeter of high-value military installations. Improved methods for rapid and accurate measurement of predetermined influential environmental parameters must be developed. Analytical techniques relating to specific sensing phenomenology’s and target/nontarget-generated signatures and signature wave interactions to variations in environmental characteristics are required. Of particular interest is the integration of multiple sensor systems (both detection-type and environmental/background monitoring transducers) that use various sensing phenomena for enhanced target detection and classification and increase nuisance and background signature rejection. Research studies are required in the determination of automated techniques for monitoring sensor system response and sensitivity to provide optimum and consistent performance as a function of time varying changes of influential environmental characteristics.

  4. The Corps of Engineers is involved with research on the design of military facilities for protection from high-energy sources. These efforts include the following research:

  a. Prediction of the response of structural elements common to conventional or expedient construction to military loads.

  b. Methods of retrofitting conventional buildings to harden them against nearby military high-energy sources.

  c. Development of innovative design of structural components, such as windows and doors, subject to high-energy sources.

  d. Development of analytical methods for predicting the effects of forced entry devices on structural components.

  e. Development of innovative designs using low-density materials for expedient protection of troops and equipment from the effects of military high- energy sources.

  f. Development of microprocessor-based software/hardware and supporting documentation to aid in the assessment of structural survivability to the effects of conventional and advanced weapons systems. The software will address the integration of databases, weapons effects calculations, and operational factors associated with engineer survivability missions.

  g. Development of a procedure to ensure robust codes, user-friendly interfaces, and supporting documentation for use in the testing and development of microprocessor-based survivability and structural assessment software/hardware.

  5. Composite Materials for Force Protection-Research in this area includes developing, characterizing, modeling, and testing of layered composite materials for protection against air blast and penetration/fragmentation. These materials are intended for use in lightweight expedient protective systems to protect against improvised explosive devices and conventional weapons such as small arms, standoff weapons, fragmenting weapons, and shape charges. It is envisioned that panels of these materials could be incorporated into protective structure designs to increase survivability of personnel or to protect mission-critical assets. Performance measures include such attributes as build time, low mass, cost, penetration resistance, ductility, and environmental durability. Additionally, this topic area includes methods to develop appropriate material anisotropic and or non-homogeneous material models for incorporation into advanced computational models such as Abaqus, LS-DYNA, and EPIC. Protocols for evaluation and performance testing of composite materials subjected to energetic, high-strain rate events are desired.

  6. Worldwide Construction Practices- This research includes capturing typical construction practices and construction material properties worldwide. Information of interest is material properties of structural components, building types and construction techniques, building footprints, construction timeframe/era of buildings, and location of the building (country, world region, urban terrain zone).

• V. Multispectral Camouflage Research (GSL-22)

  This research area involves all aspects of fixed-facility survivability incorporating signature management and other technical effects. Fixed facilities include stationary and relocatable high-value targets. The general goal is to directly and indirectly increase the survivability of U.S. and Allied facilities and improve the U.S. and allied counterintelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (counter-ISR) capability against adversaries. Multispectral refers to those areas of the electromagnetic spectrum used by the United States and potential adversaries in reconnaissance and surveillance and in attack platform target acquisition and detection. Major objectives include: quantifying or otherwise evaluating counter-ISR technology effectiveness; investigating materials and techniques for signature modification; developing technical effects and physical countermeasures, procedures, and applications; developing computer-based analytical procedures for simulating scenes; developing instrumentation for and conducting target/background signature measurements; assessing the United States and threat operations and sensor capabilities with both currently fielded and new design reconnaissance and surveillance and attack platform sensors and systems; developing applications for intelligence information for military missions; providing guidance to field commanders and information for the RDT&E community; and studies of the interaction of camouflage technology with other operational factors, particularly in determining operational supportability, costs and manpower, interoperability, and joint interoperability requirements.

• W. Advanced Maneuver Technologies (GSL-23)

  This research addresses ground vehicle maneuver in urban environments which poses many new operational and tactical challenges for the Army and Joint Forces. While many improvements have been made in protecting ground vehicles in the last decade, these improvements come with a cost, namely limited situational awareness due to reduced visibility and limited maneuverability in tight spaces because of larger vehicle size. Both of these constraints seriously reduce the mobility of ground vehicles in urban environments. To address these constraints, research is needed to develop technologies to identify nearby dynamic hazards for ground vehicles in urban environments and provide early warning to ground vehicle operators or autonomous driving systems. Specifically, this research will address methods and procedures to develop advanced technologies that will be used for detecting dynamic hazards in urban environments such as traffic flow rates and congestion, pedestrians, buried threats, constricted roads, and other obstacles or anomalous objects in real-time. In addition, further research is needed to develop technologies that will deliver the information in a consolidated or data excerpt manner and report the locations of interest and concern to the driver and or operator. The performance of emerging technologies in sensors and data processing to provide better situational awareness in near real-time to ground vehicle operators maneuvering in dynamic urban terrain is also of interest.

• X. Railroad Technology (GSL-24)

  Research in this area is conducted in support of the Corps mission to design, construct, and operate railroad systems worldwide. This research includes railroad design, construction, inspection, evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation. Research areas of interest include advanced and composite materials, rapid repair, non-destructive evaluation, geotextile use in construction, in-situ additive manufacturing of components, soil stabilization, GIS, and remote assessment.

Environmental Sensing

• Overview

  Current research is in the acquisition of information by remote sensor systems, the impact of the environment on imaging and other sensor systems, and advanced signal processing. Sensors using electromagnetic, seismic, and acoustic energy forms are of interest. In addition, work is conducted to determine terrain and other environmental effects on high- technology sensor systems. Sensor systems include optical and infrared millimeter wave (active and passive). Briefly described below are specific research areas.

• A. Sensing (EL-1)

  The EL has an ongoing program to develop and demonstrate advanced technologies that support the Army’s requirements for improved detection and discrimination of unexploded ordnance (UXO), depleted uranium (DU) munitions, radiological threats, and deployment platforms. Additional research work is needed for subsurface (land-based) and underwater (proud and buried) UXO sensing, data analysis, display, and platform navigation/positioning. Special areas of interest include novel sensing concepts for the detection and relocation of buried objects (DU, metallic, and nonmetallic targets) using magnetic, electromagnetic induction, ground penetrating radar, seismic/acoustic, chemical, and/or radiological methods or a combination thereof. Fundamental measurements and models that define/predict the performance of these sensing methodologies in varying environmental conditions for UXO, DU and radiological targets are also of interest. Research is also needed to develop advanced data analysis techniques that can significantly reduce the number of false positives arising from natural anomalies and man-made sources.

• B. Environmental and Military Sensing (EL-2)

  1. Research in this area includes basic and applied research to develop environmental sensing, characterization, and monitoring capabilities necessary to quantify environmental site conditions and trends at local and regional scales. In the military area, research is conducted on basic signature research, to better understand target and environmental background signature characteristics.

  2. Specific areas of required research include:

  a. Development, integration, and application of remote sensing technologies and the use of these data in geospatial models to characterize site conditions over large areas.

  b. Development of innovative data fusion approaches, particularly the combined use of hyper spectral and bathymetric and/or topographic LIDAR data for the extraction of environmental information.

  c. Research to identify, model, and mitigate the effects of the environment on novel sensing techniques that address environmental and military requirements.

  d. Development of ground-based and airborne remote sensing approaches, and associated modeling, for unexploded ordnance detection, minefield detection, military targets and vehicles, and smart weapons development.

  e. Rapid collection, analysis, and visualization of sensor data for environmental quality and military applications.

• C. Environmental, Sensing, Characterization, and Modeling (EL-3)

  There is growing need to utilize and develop artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies for enhanced characterization of forested environments. Novel technologies should leverage remotely sensed and high fidelity in-situ data to improve understanding of complex forest conditions. Numerous benefits for military defense, environmental stewardship, forest resource monitoring and evaluation, and military readiness exist from identifying, quantifying, visualizing, and understanding forest data. Research is needed to capitalize on recent developments in AI-based big data analytics to characterize forests and forest-dwelling species and habitats data to better understand vegetated ecosystems that is traditionally obtained through in situ sampling. Research is needed to capitalize on recent developments in AI based big data analytics to characterize forests and other ecosystems.

  Specific areas of required research include:

  a. Developing novel forest modeling frameworks that utilize remote-sensing and in-situ field data to inform and validate forest characterization—to include vertical stratification.

  b. Quantifying forest characteristics and associated forest-dwelling fauna—to include threatened and endangered species. Provide specialized expertise in the application and deployment of advanced environmental sensors to detect and monitor rare and sensitive species—particularly focused in tropical forested habitats.

  c. Demonstrated experience deploying, managing, and analyzing data from remotely deployed autonomous environmental sensor platforms, including paired acoustic/visual monitoring systems such as Autonomous Recording Units (ARUs), omnidirectional microphones, trail cameras, and related technologies to document rare and sensitive species presence, behavior, and responses to anthropogenic noise disturbances and military training activities.

  d. Tailoring sensor arrays to rapidly detect, evaluate, and quantify both acoustic and visual data in Pacific Island forested ecosystems.

• D. Environmental Instrumentation (EL-4)

  1. Research and development in this area includes basic and applied research and technology demonstrations that support rapid measurement of biological and chemical hazards of the environment.

  2. Specific areas of required research include:

  a. The integration and interoperability of environmental instrumentation with future and existing military robotic systems: this includes unmanned aerial systems, ground robotics, autonomous submersibles, and robotic surface watercraft.

  b. Provide new applications that support faster processing on small low-power hardware to triage environmental measurements to immediately identify biological and chemical hazards.

  c. Techniques that support biomimicry in robotic systems and the differentiation of biotic from abiotic systems. Instruments that are low-power, small, and compact to assess the biological and chemical characteristics of water, soil, and air, in surface and subterranean environments.

  d. Research into sensing of aerosols and/or plumes from either ground or airborne platforms.

  e. Research into novel uses of unmanned aerial systems for environmental characterization and change detection - including fusion of active and passive modalities.

Contaminated Site Characterization, Assessment & Remediation

• Overview

  An extensive research and development program is being conducted by the Department of Defense to assist in the cleanup of contamination at military installations. The EL is developing technologies for characterizing, monitoring, and applying physical, chemical, and biological treatment of toxic and hazardous waste in contaminated surface and ground waters and soils. The EL is also developing, evaluating, and verifying numerical models and guidance for solid waste disposal systems.

• A. Innovative Technology for Environmental Sensors and Tools. (EL-5)

  The EL has an ongoing research program to develop advanced technologies for environmental sensing, characterization, and monitoring in order to quantify environmental conditions at sites of interest. The program is actively developing field-based tools and sensors to conduct rapid site characterization/screening for environmental contaminants. Additional research is needed in the areas of novel sensing technologies for detection of chemical and biological contaminants allowing for rapid field-based data acquisition. Also, research is needed to develop technologies and platforms allowing for rapid data analysis/interpretation/reporting. Fundamental measurements and models that define/predict the performance of new sensing methods in soil, water and air are also of interest.

• B. Innovative Technologies for Treating Contaminated, Sediment, Soil, Surface Water, Ground Water, and Hazardous Waste (EL-6)

  Presently, EL is continuing to conduct research, develop technologies and apply strategies to treat complex organic- and metal-contaminated hazardous liquids, off-gases, soils, sludges, sediments, and residuals from past disposal practices. Research is divided into two major categories: technologies for treating contaminated soils and sediments, and innovative technologies for treating contaminated surface and ground waters. Areas of R&D include: (1) physical and chemical technologies to destroy/detoxify or reduce the quantity and/or toxicity of the contaminated materials, (2) biological processes and methods to detoxify/destroy hazardous waste constituents, (3) techniques for in situ treatment of groundwater aquifers, (4) laboratory design criteria for and field implementation of piloting equipment for promising technologies, (5) computer-based techniques to assess operational performance of various treatment processes/systems and (6) improved analytical chemistry techniques and methodology to assess treatment technologies.

• C. Design, Evaluation, Verification and Modeling of Solid and Hazardous Wastes and Contaminated Sediments (EL-7)

  Efforts are continuing to develop water balance and leachate models for solid waste disposal systems and dredged material disposal facilities. Additional work is needed to model innovative designs, nonsoil surface materials, cobbled surfaces, preferential flow through heterogeneous waste materials and other layers, and effects of complex mixtures of vegetation including trees. Similarly, additional work is needed to verify the existing models.

Sediment Geochemistry and Biological Effects

• Overview

  Potential adverse environmental impacts of disposal of contaminated sediments must be assessed prior to permitting operations. This includes the determination of the impacts that contaminated dredged materials exert on the environment prior to dredging.

• A. Environmental Risk Assessment (EL-8)

  Current research on the fate and effects of environmental contaminants occurs under the general paradigm of Environmental Risk Assessment. Specific studies fall into one or more of the following areas:

  1. Hazard Identification. This is the process of showing causality (i.e., a chemical or complex mixture can cause some adverse effect). If this causality can be demonstrated, the chemical is referred to as a "hazard." If there is no causal link, risk need not be quantified. Important target receptors are also identified by this stage (for example, humans, endangered species, and ecologically or economically important species). Research is conducted to develop the technology for hazard identification and the establishment of causality.

  2. Effects Assessment. While Hazard Identification decides if a chemical or complex mixture is toxic; Effects Assessment establishes the relationship of the toxicant dose and associated biological response. This is accomplished via experimental research in which surrogate species are exposed to gradients (spatial, concentration, etc.) of the hazard in question, and biological effects are monitored. Biologically important endpoints measured include survival, growth, reproduction, and population-level parameters. These endpoints must be accompanied by technically sound interpretive guidance. Results are expressed in dose- response or exposure-response relationships. Research is conducted to develop the necessary experimental/statistical designs, technically sound tests (for example, chronic sub lethal sediment bioassays) and appropriate extrapolations (for example, high dose to low environmentally realistic exposures, and surrogate test species to receptor of interest). Analysis of the uncertainty associated with these effects assessments is also conducted.

  3. Exposure Assessment. In Exposure Assessment, the magnitude, frequency, and duration of contaminant exposure relative to the target receptor(s) are determined. This research is model-intensive, with both descriptive and quantitative models being used to evaluate pathways and routes. A pathway exists if the hazard travels between the initial source of contamination and the ultimate biological receptor. An exposure route is pathway that the chemical contacts the receptor (for example, ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer). Analysis of the uncertainty associated with these exposure assessments is also conducted.

  4. Risk Characterization, Management, Communication, and Analysis. Outputs from the Effects Assessment and Exposure Assessments are joined in Risk Characterization to yield an estimate of risk. Research is conducted to determine the best ways to characterize risk both numerically and descriptively. Also, uncertainty analysis is undertaken to identify the qualitative and quantitative important sources of uncertainty. Techniques employed include error propagation, probability distributions, sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and others. Once environmental risk has been quantified, management action may be required.

  5. Research is conducted to develop management alternatives, which range from no action to extensive (and expensive) remediation. Results of the Environmental Risk Assessment are weighed and balanced with other factors such as applicable laws and regulations, engineering feasibility, potential benefits, costs, economic impacts, and the socio-political decision environment.

  Risk Communication is a dialogue that occurs at two levels: between the risk assessor and the risk manager, and between the risk manager and the public. Research is conducted to identify optimal procedures for communicating environmental risks, including an appreciation for the limits and uncertainties of the numerical results. Risk Analysis is a broad, inclusive term encompassing the processes of Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Risk Communication as well as any field verification or monitoring activities. Field verification is a study or studies carried out to determine the accuracy of laboratory observations and predictions. Field monitoring (in the context of Risk Assessment) is undertaken to ensure that steps taken to manage the chemical risks were successful. Field research studies are carried out for both verification and monitoring purposes.

  6. Engineering With Nature® (EWN®) Research Supporting Innovative Field Sampling Practices, Natural Infrastructure (NI) Construction/Deployment and Related Technologies. Conduct a broad array of EWN research and development that may include, but is not limited to: research pertaining to placement of scientific instruments and/or pursuit of novel experiments that advance field-based sampling and laboratory practices for the purpose of measuring and archiving the performance of natural infrastructure (NI); conduct research and/or test innovative instrumentation that records/monitors natural and engineering processes resulting from the placement of NI and/or hybrid infrastructure; conduct research and test new technologies that result in accelerated construction/placement of natural and nature based features and/or improved placement strategies for dredged sediment used to construct EWN projects.

  7. Technology Transfer Development for Engineering With Nature® (EWN®) Research Areas. Research, develop and analyze technology transfer concepts; analyze target audiences for technical information; test innovative methods of transferring EWN research results and technology to supplement conventional technology transfer. Included may be such items as interactive internet and PC technology applied to training and general information transfer; technology applications of electronic media using the Internet; and innovative public information systems/products. Audiences include Corps of Engineers and the Department of Defense; Congress and other Federal, State, and local agencies; port and transportation authorities; universities; environmentalists and other public interest groups; and the general public.

• B. Sediment Water Interactions (EL-9)

  Sediment/Soil Water Properties. Current research encompasses a wide range of investigations designed to increase understanding of sediment-water interactions. Emphasis is on conduct of investigations for determining the impacts that sediment/soil properties have on sorption and transformation of explosives and release of semi-volatile contaminants to the atmosphere. Factors responsible for sorption and transformation of explosives include redox potential, pH, and the geochemical characteristics of the soil or sediment. Factors affecting the release of semi volatile contaminants from soil or sediment to the atmosphere include relative humidity, wind speed, contaminant concentration, moisture content, porosity, and organic carbon content. Research is also conducted on colloidal system contaminant transport, accelerated sediment oxidation, and the role of solution chemistry in contaminant partitioning between sediment and water.

  Diverse research activities focused on characterizing microorganisms and microbial communities in natural and engineered environments relevant to contaminant transformations, biogeochemical cycling, host-microbiome-contaminant interactions, bio- enabled materials, synthetic biology, and environmental biological threats are currently underway.

  1. Biodegradation of Contaminants. Studies in the biodegradation area emphasize destruction of organic contaminants for remediation purposes. Emphasis is on (1) bioinformatics of microbial community diversity and activities in various ecosystems; (2) delineating biodegradation pathways, enzymes, and genes; (3) determining intermediate and final end- products; (4) assessing the role of environmental and genetic factors regulating the pathways utilized and the rate and extent of destruction of the parent compound; (5) determining the survival and activity of microorganisms added to ecosystems, and biotreatment systems; and (6) enhancing biodegradation to obtain the maximum destruction of organic contaminants within a soil, sediment, or treatment system.

  2. Microbial Sensing. Novel microbial, cellular, molecular and/or genomic approaches are sought and developed for the rapid functional and DNA-based identification, detection, and monitoring of microorganisms in various environmental matrices including soils, sediments, and surface waters. Novel ecological approaches to detect, monitor and predict prokaryotic/eukaryotic microbes are sought that combine physiology, molecular tools, biochemistry, modeling, and remote sensing for the management of high biomass events and environmental toxins.

  3. Biomaterials and Composite Structures. Novel biological materials and/or techniques are sought to manipulate bioprocesses and biomineralization pathways as additives to aggregate and composite products. These products will support advancements in material structural properties that support civil works and military operations.

  4. Insect and plant field collections, insect husbandry, plant maintenance with greenhouse access is sought for various microbiome projects. Needs will be seasonal and very specific to limited insect or plant systems as dictated by internal projects.

  5. Soil, Sediment and Environmental Chemistry. Research interests broadly center on deciphering environmental processes that shape the emergent chemical, physical and biological properties of soils and sediments in natural and built environments. Studies aim to bridge the gap between fundamental science and practical engineering solutions to enhance understanding of environmental processes, improve infrastructure resilience, and promote sustainable practices in soil and sediment management.

  a. Geochemistry of Soils and Sediments. Topics of interest include understanding i) the cycling of nutrients, metal(loid)s, and radionuclides in soils and sediments, ii) the impact of dynamic chemical conditions on soil physical properties, and iii) complex interactions between chemical reactions and dynamic fluid flow (reactive transport). Of particular interest are soil systems impacted by seawater inundation, wildfire, and other natural and anthropogenic disturbances, which alter the productivity, erodibility and trafficability of soils, and soil characteristics that influence military operations and natural disasters. Studies employ the use of novel field measurements, laboratory experiments, and advanced methods of soil analysis, such as synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy, -X-ray diffraction, and X-ray fluorescence microprobe analysis. Molecular to field-scale processes occurring in soils and sediments are modeled using computational tools such as geochemical and reactive transport modeling.

  b. Soils and Sediments in the Built Environment. Research broadly focuses on the function and characteristics of soil and sediment within built environments, including dynamic urban coastal zones. In the built environment, soils and sediments are altered by human activities and/or derived from human-transported materials. Anthropogenic impacts on soil may be intentional (e.g., engineered for a specific purpose) or unintentional (e.g., accidental release of waste). Our research aims to decipher both intentional and unintentional consequences of anthropogenic activities on the health and function of soils and sediments. Focus area includes (1) standardizing approaches to soil health assessment (2) methods to enhance soil functions in nature-based features such as carbon sequestration and water retention, and (3) fate of legacy contaminants such as lead.

• C. Techniques for Contaminated Dredged Material Disposal and Treatment (EL-10)

  1. Development/implementation of innovative technologies to reduce or eliminate contamination present in surface sediment and/or dredged materials. Research to include 1) technologies for cost effective in situ treatment of surface sediments to reduce bioavailability/toxicity; 2) ex situ treatment technologies to reduce contamination and facilitate expanded opportunities for beneficial use of treated material.

  2. Development or enhancement of computer models to be included in the Automated Dredging and Disposal Alternatives Modeling System (ADDAMS) to evaluate the environmental impacts of dredged material disposal. Evaluations include water quality impacts of initial release in open water, effluent discharge, runoff and leachate, benthic impacts, plant and animal uptake, and volatilization.

  3. Development and/or application of new or improved environmental chemistry methodologies to assess contaminant concentrations of dredged material and other complex matrices (e.g., elutriates, bioaccumulation tissues, etc.) focusing on specific compounds or classes, cost effectiveness, quality assurance, lower detection limits, and removal/reduction of challenging matrix interferences.

• D. EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT (EL-11)

  1. Presently, EL is continuing to conduct research, develop technologies and apply strategies to address emerging contaminants (ECs) in the environment. Research falls into for 5 broad categories:

  a. Detection and Measurement:

  b. Development and application of technologies for the detection and measurement of ECs in environmental media at environmentally relevant concentrations.

  c. Application of innovative technologies to discern source of EC contamination.

  d. Screening level methodologies to facilitate near real time detection and measurement of ECs in the field.

  e. Development of forensic methodologies and computational approaches for detection, measurement, prediction of EC precursors and/or degradation products in environmental media.

  2. Exposure Assessment:

  Development and application of technologies for measuring/predicting the movement and fate of ECs in the environment.

  3. Effects Assessment:

  Development and/or application of technologies for establishing the effects of ECs on important ecological and human health receptors/endpoints.

  4. Risk Characterization/Management:

  a. Development and/or application of innovative technologies for characterizing risk of ECs in environmental media. Development and/or application of decision-making tools to support EC related risk management decision-making.

  b. Development and/or application of innovative technologies to remove, concentrate, and/or destroy ECs in environmental media.

  c. Development and/or application of innovative technologies to assist in identification of safer alternatives.

Environmental and Water Quality Modeling

• Overview

  The Corps of Engineers is involved in research and development related to water quality and contaminant fate/transport modeling for surface water, watersheds, and the subsurface, or groundwater. This encompasses a wide range of environmental issues, such as water quality and ecosystem linkages, contaminant transport and fate, eutrophication, effects of land use/management on watershed runoff quality, total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), and ecological and human health risk assessment as related to contaminants in the environment. Research may include model development and field and laboratory investigations to improve model descriptions and to provide required data for model validation.

• A. Numerical Water Quality and Contaminant Modeling (EL-12)

  This area of work is oriented toward development and application of water quality and contaminant fate/transport models for surface water and the subsurface, or groundwater. Surface water modeling includes watersheds and receiving waters, e.g., riverine, reservoir, wetland, estuarine, and coastal water bodies. Groundwater modeling includes modeling both the unsaturated and saturated zones, as well as multi-component flow and transport. Models are utilized for conventional water quality (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, dissolved oxygen, etc.) and contaminants, i.e., toxic substances, such as organic chemicals, trace metals, radionuclides, explosives, and other military unique compounds. Emphasis includes the following: formulation of appropriated physical, chemical, and biological algorithms; improvement of mathematical and numerical methods; collection and assemblage of data for model evaluation; conduct of field and laboratory process investigations designed to develop/improve model descriptions, dynamic linkage of water quality and biological models, including biomass-based, individual-based, and population- based biological models; integration of contaminant exposure models with biological effects data or models to quantify risk; incorporation of uncertainty analysis into modeling; linkage of physical/chemical models with biological population models; linkage of cross- domain models for system wide modeling; development of routines/linkages to include the effects on water quality of watershed landscape features (e.g., buffer zones) and vegetation management; development of a risk assessment modeling system; and development of software to provide graphical user interfaces and modeling environments to enhance model utility and ease of application.

• B. Complex Adaptive Systems (EL-13)

  The central goal of this effort is to identify the rules and feedback processes that govern how interactions between modular components in natural system shape important holistic properties, like the global resiliency to disturbances, and, invariably, the fate of the individual components themselves. These tasks are central to basic research efforts in Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS); an area that impacts a wide range of critical needs in both military and civil works (e.g., immune system responses, decision-making, social feedbacks, and ecosystem management). Current research focuses on ecological systems in which the use of different species and study systems is encouraged to provide diverse and novel solutions to understanding, predicting, or improving the resiliency of complex systems. Recent case studies range from a contaminant’s (e.g., altered water quality, noise, chemical) impacts on individual development and performance, the social roots of information cascades in social vertebrates (spanning from fish and humans), to overall ecosystem functioning based on infrastructure design, overharvesting, or mismanagement. This topic area is inherently interdisciplinary and emphasizes team efforts in the combination of analytical, numerical, and laboratory experiments to test competing hypotheses.

• C. Water Quality and Behavior Modeling (EL-14)

  This research topic focuses on developing early warning indicators to demonstrate how changes in water quality can affect critical ecological processes, thereby raising the subsequent risks imposed on animal populations. We focus on demonstrating when environmental quality is not merely a potential hazard, but how it elicits a functional (e.g., physiological) change during early exposure stages that can impact future performance and, invariably, population survival. Anthropogenic disturbances would include sediment plumes, temperature spikes, or contaminants. Animals typically display stable and, generally, predictable physiological and behavioral patterns in non-stressful conditions.

  However, sub- lethal (including chronic) or acute environmental changes can drastically alter behavior and activity, remain undetected, and invariably introduce unacceptable levels of error in model predictions. Current methodologies range from simple bioassays to more complex physiological consequences at the individual level, to long-term costs/benefits at higher ecological levels (i.e., habitat use, populations, and communities). Hypothesis testing based on a combination of laboratory and modeling is encouraged, along with field data when possible. Findings from these efforts play an important role in both civil works and military activities.

Environmental Impact Prediction, Assessment and Management

• Overview

  This research program addresses environmental impact prediction, assessment, and remediation and is intended to provide Corps, Army, and other field operating elements with techniques and methodologies for environmental assessments and EIS preparation, guidance on selecting appropriate planning, design, construction, and operation alternatives, and implementation of the planning function pursuant to NEPA and other legislation and guidance. Specific objectives include:

  A. Developing, verifying, and demonstrating practical prediction and assessment techniques including applying and refining habitat-based evaluation methods, evaluating mitigation measures, developing streamlined frameworks for environmental monitoring, applying ecosystem simulation principles to environmental analysis, and estimating future habitat quality.

  B. Documenting and quantifying environmental effects associated with various types of Corps, Army, and other activities. Research has included the effects of aquatic habitat modification on anadromous fishes, the effects of selective clearing and snagging on in stream habitat, and t h e benefits of channel modification for aquatic habitat in reservoir tail waters and local flood control channels.

  C. Developing and demonstrating design, construction, and management alternatives that will minimize adverse effects and protect natural and cultural resources. Research has included techniques for managing wildlife habitats, preserving archeological sites, and stabilizing eroding shorelines.

  D. Developing, validating, and demonstrating novel systems biology-, computational biology- or bioinformatics-based approaches to understanding and quantifying toxicological impacts of environmental contaminants in environmentally relevant organisms.

• A. Biotechnical Shore Stabilization (EL-15)

  Biotechnical (sometimes called bioengineering) shore stabilization is the use of a combination of live vegetation and structural materials (for example, breakwaters, geotextiles, erosion control fabrics/mats, building materials) for erosion control of shores. Shores of particular interest are those of streams, lakes, or dredged material deposits and subject to erosion from waves, surface runoff, and wind. Research is needed to determine the causes and amounts of erosion and to identify and assess cost-effective biotechnical erosion control methods. Studies may include, but are not limited to, identifying, developing, and cultivating appropriate flood- tolerant plants and varieties or cultivars and cost-effective installation procedures of biotechnical techniques.

• B. Freshwater Fishery Investigations (EL-16)

  Primary areas of research are predicting environmental impacts of navigation and flood control projects on fishes, freshwater mussels, and other aquatic fauna; benefits of restoring aquatic habitat including environmental flows; conservation of endangered fish and mussel species; evaluating freshwater and coastal wetland fish communities; management of invasive species movement and colonization including Asian Carp; and fishery management in vegetated waterbodies. New and innovative approaches to determine physiological, behavioral, population and community level responses of fishes to habitat variables are of interest, along with technological advancements in sampling and multivariate data analysis capabilities. Demographic and landscape habitat models are anticipated products of this research.

• C. Freshwater Macro invertebrate Investigations (EL-17)

  Research focuses on assessment of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate communities, with emphasis on insects and mussels. Studies include stream and river biotic assessments, terrestrial and aquatic insect surveys, assessment of threatened and endangered invertebrate populations, feeding ecology of fishes, and evaluation of stream and river food webs and energetics. Assessments of environmental effects of USACE activities, including stream and river impoundments and structural changes, are also performed using naturally occurring macroinvertebrate and mussel communities as indicators of current and past ecological shifts. Restoration and management recommendations are also made through the analysis of these invertebrate communities in both freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Technical and analytical advancements, including sampling and data analysis are of interest.

• D. Mitigation (EL-18)

  An avoidance, minimization, and/or compensation process is required for impacts from water resources projects on ecological resources (fish, wildlife, habitat, or installation activities). Planning and implementing mitigation are a complex process, and new ideas that contribute to success of mitigation are invited. Subjects such as Best Management Practices for avoiding or minimizing impacts, planning for mitigation based on impact analysis, incremental analysis to justify mitigation, mitigation banking, future predictions, and mitigation for indirect or cumulative impacts are included.

• E. In Stream Flow Requirements for Aquatic Biota (EL-19)

  Research focuses on development and application of fish habitat assessment methods. Currently, the most widely used system, the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM), is used to assess the effects of reservoir operations on downstream fish habitat. Research is needed to better quantify the relationships for fish preference and flow conditions, as well as habitat requirements for aquatic invertebrates. When appropriate, laboratory-based studies can support field-based modelling efforts. Verification studies of these models will be required as development continues. Assessment methods must be able to evaluate the impacts of a variety of reservoir operations such as base load or peaking hydropower releases and at multiple scales from single project to basin – wide studies.

• F. Behavioral and Structural Fish Barriers (EL-20)

  Entrainment of fish at Corps hydropower projects may result in passage of fish through turbines with attendant death or injury from impact with runner blades, pressure changes, or shear forces. Evaluations of a number of behaviorally based technologies and structural barrier designs conducted under laboratory and field conditions have yielded results that are generally inconsistent. Consequently, there currently exist no consistent guidelines for selection of appropriate technology for site-specific applications at Corps dams. Research is required to relate effectiveness of different technologies to size and species of fish, dam design, operations, season, and other site-specific conditions. The information produced by this research will be used to develop specifications and guidelines for fish protection technologies at Corps dams to reduce entrainment and mortality. This effort may involve literature synthesis, laboratory research, design and fabrication of prototype systems, or field studies as well as simulation analysis of fish movement/passage patterns.

• G. Fish Guidance and Bypass Systems (EL-21)

  CE water resource activities may result in blockage of historical fish migration routes through waterways. These blockages, with associated fragmentation of habitats, may have severe impacts on anadromous and catadromous fish populations. A variety of bypass system technologies are available to guide fish around dams. However, many of these systems operate at reduced efficiencies because they damage fish, fish are unable to locate entrances to the systems, or because fish become disoriented and "fall back" after an initial successful passage. Research is required to better understand the hydraulic and behavioral characteristics of fish bypass systems, including the use of behavioral technologies to guide fishes towards these systems and to successfully orient them within the system.

• H. Coastal Ecology (EL-22)

  Research topics in coastal ecology include multidisciplinary investigations of the environmental impacts of engineering activities in the coastal zone, such as dredging, dredged material disposal, and construction of coastal structures (e.g., jetties, breakwaters, groins, seawalls, marinas). Emphasis is placed on improved technologies for assessment, protection, and management of fish and shellfish resources and their habitats. Of particular relevance are proposals dealing with endangered species (e.g., sea turtles, marine mammals), beneficial uses of dredged material and habitat restoration in the coastal zone (e.g., marsh, oyster reef or mudflat creation), and application of population dynamics and ecological models for impact prediction and assessment at population/community/ecosystem/watershed levels. Other areas of interest include effects of beach nourishment and use of offshore borrows areas, seasonal restrictions on dredging and disposal operations, artificial reef technologies, and cumulative impact determination and mitigation techniques.

  Other focus areas include:

  a. Effects of beach nourishment on benthic communities and surf-zone (near- shore) fishes,

  b. Active and passive fisheries acoustics to assess fish migratory patterns, spawning habitat, fish density and spatial distribution patterns near dredging operations and placement sites.

  c. Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) protection from increases in turbidities and suspended sediments.

  d. Fish entrainment

  e. Behavioral changes to marine organisms (e.g., migratory blockage of migratory fishes due to the presence of the dredge, particularly in narrow or constricted waterways).

  f. Underwater noise impacts to aquatic species due to dredging and disposal operations.

  g. Ecosystem restoration (e.g., filling offshore/near-shore borrow areas to natural bathymetry).

  h. Artificial reef creation using dredged rock and other suitable material to enhance fisheries and shell fisheries resources.

  i. Thin-layer placement, re-contouring natural bathymetries. Increased costs associated due to compliance with environmental windows/seasonal restrictions imposed on dredging and disposal operations, and cumulative impact determination and mitigation techniques.

• I. Techniques for Designing, Operating and Managing Dredged Material Disposal Facilities and Beneficial Use Projects (EL-23)

  1. Refinement and verification of techniques for designing, operating, and managing dredged material disposal areas.

  2. Development of a computerized economic database for costs associated with dredging sediments; disposing of dredged material; and constructing, rehabilitating, and operating and managing dredged material disposal areas.

  3. Development and refinement of computer models for dredged material management and beneficial use to be included in the ADDAMS.

• J. Systems Biology, Computational Biology, and Bioinformatics for Environmental Impact Assessment (EL-24)

  A wide spectrum of research in systems toxicology, biological networks, synthetic biology, predictive toxicology, genomics, bioinformatic data mining of next-generation sequencing data, adverse outcome pathway development, toxicological modes of action discovery, herbicide resistance mechanisms, structural biology, chemoinformatics, and molecular modeling is currently underway. Proposed research in mechanistic/predictive toxicology, structural biology, bioinformatics, or computational biology would complement current research areas.

  1. Novel genomics, epigenetics and synthetic biology approaches are sought and developed to assess biochemical, physiological, or other toxicological (adverse) effects on the biota at molecular, cellular, tissue/organ, individual, population, community, or ecosystems levels.

  2. Novel in silico modeling and data mining approaches that are based on computational biology, biophysical or bioinformatics principles and techniques are sought and developed to systematically analyze and interpret big data generated using cutting-edge and high- dimensional biotechnologies such as next-generation DNA sequencing, hybridization-based microarray, proteomics, and metabolomics technologies. Novel mathematical approaches and analysis methodologies are also sought to interpret or describe data generated using novel experimental protocols, and which may account for internal forces, energy and information flows that regulate biological, biophysical, or bioenvironmental processes.

  3. Tools for assessing environmental impacts of synthetic biology. This work involves identifying synthetic biology technologies and understand their current state of use, development, technology readiness, as well as their potential environmental impact. This includes hazard identification, effects assessment, fate, transport, and transferability of various technologies. Moreover, the work entails quantifying environmental impacts of synthetic biological technologies through experimental and modeling approaches. This includes establishing screening mechanisms for genetic and physiological traits for synthetically derived systems, microcosm experiments with tractable organisms to assess potential for spread/transfer of synthetic constructs.

Environmental Criteria for Stream Channel Alteration Projects

• Overview

  The Corps of Engineers is involved in the alteration of stream channels for flood damage reduction, navigation, channel stabilization, and ecosystem restoration, as well as alterations performed by others as part of the Clean Water Act. Modifications to channels include removal of snags and vegetation, channel alignment (straightening), channel enlargement, construction of levees, stream bank protection, and grade control. The Corps is also involved in regulating and furnishing technical assistance to States in regard to other types of channel alterations such as gravel mining. Work at the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center’s Environmental Laboratory (EL) and elsewhere has generated environmental design criteria for stream channel alterations to improve the net effect of these projects. Examples of environmental design features include low-flow channels, combinations of structure and vegetation, management of cutoff bend ways and other backwater areas, and recreational trails.

• A. Riparian and In Stream Habitat Restoration (EL-25)

  Current research includes formulating guidelines for stream restoration and environmental enhancement of flood control and aquatic ecosystem restoration projects. Among the general issues addressed are, in-stream and riparian habitat assessment; benefits of habitat improvement, structures, and techniques; impacts of vegetation on flow conveyance and/or sustainability, channel stability, and sediment transport; construction practices; and monitoring and maintenance. Proposals are invited in these general areas and related efforts. In addition, specific needs include the following: (1) Techniques to quantify habitat and other environmental benefits of restoration efforts, as well as quantification of adverse impacts to the aquatic environment, (2) Algorithms that account for momentum losses at vegetated floodplain/channel interfaces, (3) Data supporting evaluations of the hydraulic impacts of in-stream structures, (4) Development and refinement of related computerized databases and models, and (5) Calculating impacts to and identifying vulnerabilities of riparian systems.

• B. Assessing Benefits of Channel Modifications (EL-26)

  Dams and local flood control structures may degrade aquatic habitat conditions in tail waters and streams. In some cases, habitat degradation can be eliminated, stabilized, or reversed through channel modification for aquatic habitat (i.e., construction of low-cost, low head weirs to create pools) with minimal changes in dam operation or flood channel design. However, there are no widely accepted methods available to incrementally relate in stream aquatic habitat value, channel modifications, and in stream flows to allow trade-off analyses among cost, design, and habitat benefits. It is desirable to modify existing in stream flow methods or develop new methods that will allow incremental assessment of habitat values, alternative flows, and different channel designs. This work may involve data collection, analysis, interpretation, and software development.

More topics in progress (see solicitation for all topics).

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, ERDC awards provide meaningful strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Technical Credibility:
Selection by ERDC signals strong alignment with U.S. Army and national infrastructure priorities, which can materially strengthen your credibility with customers, primes, and investors.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation:
Companies can advance core technology without equity dilution, preserving ownership while increasing enterprise value.

Long-Term Government Relationship Building:
ERDC BAAs are often a gateway into follow-on DoD contracts, reimbursable work, and sole-source opportunities.

Increased Visibility Across DoD and Civil Works:
Successful projects frequently expand beyond a single lab, creating exposure across USACE, DoD, and federal infrastructure stakeholders.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

This BAA is continuously open until January 1, 2027, and all submissions initially enter the process as pre-proposals. Pre-proposals may be submitted at any time through the ERDCWERX portal and are limited to five pages, plus a one-page executive summary.

ERDC conducts a preliminary technical review of pre-proposals as they are received. Offerors can expect a response within 60 days of submission, either encouraging submission of a full proposal or advising that the pre-proposal was not favorably reviewed.

If a pre-proposal receives a favorable review, ERDC will issue a formal invitation from the Contracting Office to submit a full proposal. Full proposals then undergo scientific peer review, cost evaluation, and funding availability assessment.

There is no fixed award cycle or batch deadline. Awards may be made at any time following successful evaluation and are subject to availability of funds.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) through its Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) and supported DoD research programs.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is unrestricted, meaning any qualified U.S. or international entity may apply, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. This includes:

• For-profit companies

• Startups and small businesses

• Universities and nonprofit research organizations

What companies and projects are likely to win?

ERDC evaluates proposals based on:

• Clear alignment with ERDC mission and stated research areas

• Strong scientific or technical merit

• Demonstrated capability of the proposing team

• Practical relevance to military or civil works challenges

• Realistic scope and cost relative to expected outcomes

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• ERDC may limit awards based on funding availability in specific technical areas

• Some projects may be subject to export control, security, or publication restrictions

• Proposals must clearly identify whether research is considered “fundamental”

• Full proposals must be submitted only through designated laboratory channels, not directly to technical staff

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive pre-proposal under this BAA will likely take 20–40 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 for the Pre-Proposal Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Defense Sciences Office (DSO) Office-wide BAA – DARPA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Defense Sciences Office (DSO) is soliciting proposals under its Office-wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) to fund revolutionary basic or applied research that enables breakthrough advances in science, devices, or systems for national security applications. Proposals are accepted on a rolling basis through June 2, 2026, and may be submitted as executive summaries, abstracts, or full proposals. This BAA is designed to capture novel, high-risk, high-reward ideas not already addressed by existing DARPA programs.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA anticipates making multiple awards, but no fixed award size or funding range is specified in the BAA. Award amounts, duration, and structure are determined based on the proposed technical scope, cost realism, and selected award instrument. An accelerated award option is available for select proposals not exceeding $2,000,000, with awards made within approximately 30 days of selection.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding may be used to pursue innovative basic or applied research concepts that enable revolutionary (not evolutionary) advances aligned with DARPA’s mission. Proposals may address, but are not limited to, the following DSO technical thrust areas:

• Materials, Manufacturing, and Structures - Breaking the tension between performance and efficiency for critical parts, production processes, energetics, superconductors, and propulsion

• Sensing, Measuring, and Affecting - Developing and leveraging new science to overcome existing barriers limiting the performance and/or practicality of sensing, measurement, and control, to achieve orders of-magnitude improvement in operational capabilities.

• Math, Computation, and Processing - Enabling quantum, reimagining classical, and developing entirely new forms of computing for enhanced efficiency and new capabilities. Solutions may range from new approaches to hardware (implementation) to representation and computation.

• Complex, Dynamic, and Intelligent Systems - Creating new scientific capabilities for classes of systems that evolve and adapt and for which traditional reductionist, data-driven, and statistical methods fail. Systems of interest include, but are not limited to, foundations of intelligence, human-AI ecosystems, homeostatic mechanisms, and global systems.

Proposals focused primarily on incremental improvements or manufacturing scale-up are explicitly excluded.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, selection under a DARPA DSO BAA provides substantial indirect value:

• DARPA Validation and Credibility: Being selected signals strong technical merit and alignment with DARPA’s mission to create or prevent technological surprise.

• Increased Visibility: Awardees gain visibility within the national security R&D ecosystem and among DARPA program managers.

• Access to DARPA Engagement Pathways: Participation can lead to future invitations to targeted DARPA programs, Disruption Opportunities (DOs), or Advanced Research Concepts (ARCs).

• Nondilutive De-Risking: Advancing frontier technology with nondilutive capital can materially improve company valuation and future exit outcomes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

1. Review Process: Rolling through June 2, 2026

2. Accelerated Award Option: Awards made within ~30 days of selection for qualifying proposals

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) within the U.S. Department of Defense, through the Defense Sciences Office (DSO).

Who is eligible to apply?

1. U.S. and non-U.S. organizations may apply

2. Small businesses, startups, universities, and large firms are eligible

3. FFRDCs, UARCs, and Government Entities (including National Labs) are not eligible

4. Non-U.S. participants must comply with export control, security, and nondisclosure requirements

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA evaluates proposals based on the following criteria:

• Scientific and technical merit of a novel, feasible, and well-reasoned approach

• Relevance and contribution to DARPA’s mission and national security impact

• Clear articulation of technical risk and credible mitigation strategies

• Strong alignment between scope, cost, and schedule realism

• Ability to enable revolutionary—not incremental—advances

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Incremental or evolutionary improvements are not of interest

• Manufacturing scale-up is explicitly excluded

• Some projects may involve Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and require compliance with NIST SP 800-171

• Projects involving human subjects or animal research must follow DARPA approval procedures

• DARPA retains discretion to determine whether work is fundamental or non-fundamental research

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Emerging Weapons, Munitions Systems, and Soldier Lethality BAA

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Army’s Emerging Weapons and Munitions Systems & Soldier Lethality BAA invites industry and academia to submit innovative R&D concepts that advance a wide variety of critical armament technologies. The program remains open through March 17, 2026, and white papers may be submitted at any time.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings. Awards may be:

• Contracts for basic/applied research

• Other Transactions for Research or Prototypes (including cost-share requirements in some cases)

• Multi-year efforts, typically up to three years, with incremental funding.

The scope and cost depend entirely on the proposed technical approach and feasibility.

What could I use the funding for?

The U.S. Army Futures Command’s Army Modernization Strategy (AMS) will catapult the U.S. Army forward to meet its enduring responsibility as part of the Joint Force to provide for the defense of the United States, and retain and secure its position by 2035 as the globally dominant land power. The end state is a modernized Army capable of conducting Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) as part of an integrated Joint Force in a single theater. The MDO concept describes how the Army will support the Joint Force in the rapid and continuous integration of all domains of warfare – land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace – to deter and prevail as we compete short of conflict, and fight and win if deterrence fails.

The modernization strategy shifts the top focus to mid-term modernization, while maintaining readiness for current operations. The six Army modernization priorities – long range precision fires, next generation combat vehicles, future vertical lift, network, air and missile defense, and soldier lethality are the pillars of our future success. Additionally, the Army will continue to reform its business processes, shifting from Industrial Age to Information Age approaches.

It is anticipated that many future technology developments will be made in conjunction with the tools of the Information Age. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is considered as a key tool needed to bring next-generation technology to the warfighter on time, and at minimal costs.

M&S should be incorporated into technology developmental efforts whenever possible. Additionally, it is believed that concepts like the Containerized Software Applications & Orchestration, DevSecOps, Government Cloud Software Factories, Internet of Things (IOT), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cyber Security (CS) will play increasingly more prominent roles in many of the technologies that will be developed to provide the battlefield overmatch that we need, and to keep our warfighter safe.

The U.S. Army Armaments Center’s Business Interface Office is looking to identify and develop technologies for the purpose of addressing key elements of the Army’s modernization priorities. Efforts under this BAA should focus on the development and demonstration of technology for current and future generation munitions and armament systems, including Logistics. This shall be accomplished via investigative research efforts in the following general technology areas:

• 1. ADVANCED MATERIALS

  The Government has the need for investigations and research into the development and demonstration of advanced materials for weapons and munitions applications. This shall include advanced alloy systems, polymers and composites that can reduce parasitic weight, increase performance (lethality, range, etc.), extend shelf life, reduce item costs, conserve strategic materials, etc. Materials of interest include, but are not limited to: titanium, tantalum, tungsten, steel, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, ceramics, cermets, rare earth metals, polymer-based composites, filled composite materials and metal-matrix composites. Processes and production systems to manufacture, as well as specialized tools and methodologies for characterization, testing, and analysis of these advanced materials, are also desired.

  The Government is interested in materials that will reduce weight, improve ballistics or provide protection to extend the service life of the barrels and other components of small, medium and large caliber weapon systems. These materials may be associated with coatings e.g. cold spray, plasma spray, laser deposition, high velocity oxygen fuel, laser peening, etc.; surface modification i.e. superfine finishing, or material substitutions such as ceramic, polymer and/or composite materials. The behavior of materials in service conditions such as crack initiation and growth, as well as fatigue behavior of materials is of interest. Additionally, nano-materials hold great promise either in themselves or in combination with other materials to increase the performance of the base materials. Processes, which produce unique material characteristics with a nano-size grain structure are of interest.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are materials for hypersonic applications, materials subject to high thermal stress, active countermeasure materials, frangible ammunition alloys, thermoelectric materials, high efficiency insulation materials etc.

• 2. ELECTRONICS / SENSORS

  The Government has the need for efforts addressing fabrication technology R&D for micro- system chips based on the silicon, deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) process. This technology is to be utilized for miniature electronic board applications. Processed chips will be applied for microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices for Safe and Arm and micro-initiation components. The Government has the need for efforts in the R&D of anti-tamper systems for remote armament systems. Anti-tampering systems are needed in increasing numbers, as military priority capability needs for autonomous tactical behaviors, autonomous movement, and manned/unmanned lethality are growing. Solutions are being sought to protect remote armament systems on the battlefield, in urban environments and in storage. The R&D efforts should include a capability that tracks tampering attempts made on unmanned systems. Anti-tamper systems that are capable of deactivating battery-operated unmanned systems are needed as well. The Government has a need for efforts in the R&D of micro-system packaging and micro-system architecture for input into remote armament systems. Novel optical, electrical and hermetic sealing techniques and capabilities will be needed to support this effort.

  The Government also has need of efforts in the R&D of advanced distributed sensors (radar, electro-optics, infrared, direction finding) to provide fire control solutions supporting existing and emerging DEVCOM-AC weapon systems. Different sensors must provide detection range (minimum and maximum), angular coverage (ideally hemispherical or better), update rates, and measurement accuracies necessary for a given application within the appropriate timelines to assure that countermeasures are effective against a wide variety of threats including ground vehicles, unmanned air systems, direct and indirect fire. The sensors must also operate within size, weight, and power constraints of target platforms. Designs should also be developed with cost in mind. Sensor systems should also, to the extent possible, operate on the move. The sensors must operate in a variety of environments (dust, fog, rain, etc.) and should meet MIL- STD requirements for electromagnetic interference, electromagnetic compatibility, temperature, pressure, other environmental conditions, etc., as appropriate. In particular, sensors must be capable of operating in increasingly congested electromagnetic environments. They should be capable of multiple modes, missions, and applications, and, as such, should be easily configurable/re-programmable. The sensors must have good clutter/background cancellation capability and be able to discriminate amongst targets – allowing accurate, automatic identification of threat targets, while rejecting targets that are not of interest. Along with discrimination, there is also a need for sensors to be able to determine threat intent. Both discrimination and threat intent, in turn, require labeled data sets for algorithm development and/or training of machine learning (ML)/artificial intelligence (AI) processors. Sensors should use open, modular, scalable architectures to the extent possible. In addition, for specific missions, sensors should be compliant with appropriate standards or architectures (e.g. the U. S. Army’s Modular Active Protection System framework). They should also be designed for manufacturability, maintainability, upgradability, and flexibility. Sensors should be designed such that they can be used on a variety of platforms with the appropriate integration packages/kits.

  DEVCOM-AC continues to seek new, innovative methods for enhanced lethality by disrupting anti access area denial (A2AD) systems at extended ranges in contested operational environments. This includes munitions delivered non-kinetic effects to deceive, degrade, and deny adversarial sensor systems and infrastructure. The capability should be scalable, focused on peer adversaries in a major conflict by employing a complex diversity on non-kinetic effects for offensive purposes, such as directly defeating adversary capability, delaying and degrading counter fire, and creating uncertainty and confusion. Munitions delivered non-kinetic effects will require distributed, collaborate, and autonomous behaviors to engage a peer adversary, and enhance diversity of the effects. Development of key enablers will be required in the domain of distributed autonomy, including munitions hardened hardware, field upgradeable software, tactics, primitives, and algorithms. In addition to offensive EW capability, the USG also has a need for non-kinetic effectors for use in counter unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) scenarios and in defensive postures.

  As capability increases and munition payloads become more complex, the USG anticipates that there will be an added emphasis on the miniaturization and capability of all on board electronic components. This would include, but is not limited to, the payload capabilities listed above, onboard sensors and onboard electronics.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are unique technologies that address:

  a. Low phase noise oscillators

  b. High-efficiency power amplifiers

  c. Small tunable bandpass filters

  d. Distributed local oscillator architectures

  e. Advanced clutter and multipath mitigation techniques

  f. Machine learning/artificial intelligence techniques supporting discrimination, threat intent, etc.

  g. Special-purpose integrated circuits, including RF systems on chips

  h. Advanced lightweight materials

  i. Additive manufacturing

  j. Active electronic phased arrays

  k. Digital antenna array architectures

  l. Precise antenna calibration techniques

  m. Advanced electronic protection techniques

  n. High-performance, heterogeneous processing “backends”

  o. Built-in test and diagnostics

  p. Collaborative non-kinetic techniques

  q. Sense, Target, Engage Autonomy

  r. Munition hardened payloads and antennas

  s. Scalable and field upgradeable software frameworks

  t. Beyond Line of Sight Techniques

  u. Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems

  v. Data Fusion

  w. Artificial Intelligence deep learning for classifications

  Additional items include gun launchable sensors, environmental sensing technologies, flexible printed/hybrid electronics, novel inks for printed electronics applications, interconnects for flexible electronics, novel substrate materials, and low power electronic components.

• 3. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY

  The Government has a need for research efforts to establish the science behind the manufacture of quality weapon and munitions components, and the integrated data environment that will allow the process knowledge to be retained by the Army in a central repository for future use. These efforts shall address the identification, definition and understanding of materials, equipment, processing and procedures associated with the manufacture of weapons and munitions components; and the capture of that information so that this knowledge can be readily transferred to the industrial base for use in component manufacture using qualification and certification practices to instill quality, reliability, and safety. Efforts shall also address the integration of the 3D-Technical Data Package philosophy in the design to manufacturing cycle, and the sharing of digital information across dissimilar systems. Efforts that enhance DEVCOM-AC’s ability to understand the underlying science of component manufacture or further DEVCOM-AC’s capability to document and transfer manufacturing processes are desirable. Additionally, efforts that establish manufacturing science test beds, including Additive Manufacturing, to complement DEVCOM-AC’s prototyping capabilities are encouraged.

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in manufacturing and fabricating components for weapon and munitions systems. Of high interest are technologies that will extend the life of high-value components, such as small, medium and large caliber gun barrels. These technologies may be associated with coatings e.g. cold spray, plasma spray, laser deposition, high velocity oxygen fuel coating, laser peening, intensive quenching, etc.; and surface modification, i.e. superfine finishing, or material substitutions such as ceramic materials. Also, processes that reduce weight of system components, or extend performance either in terms of life, ballistics, or protection are of interest. Finally, the Government is interested in emerging technologies that can eliminate the use of Cr+6 based (hexavalent chromium) surface treatments used on weapon system components to include, but not limited to, gun barrels, recoil mechanisms, aircraft landing gear assemblies, etc. These processes shall be environmentally- compliant and provide equivalent, or better, performance as compared to Cr+6 -based surface treatments.

  Further, the Government is interested in manufacturing processes to reduce cost, cycle time, and fabricate parts where price is independent of quantity. Examples of such processes include rapid prototyping technology, and free forming technology whether laser based, plasma based, or polymer based. Our vision of the future requires a “paperless process” from designer to machine. Inherent in this process are several subsets including a “model centric” design environment, including intelligent machining, joining, and processing. One goal is to add intelligence to machine tools to enable them to do a self-assessment, self-programming, self- diagnostics, self-scheduling, and in-process monitoring using both software and sensor tools capable of surviving in the harsh processing environment. Lastly, the Government is interested in fiber optic technology, and remote sensing or optics necessary for such systems; and technologies that instill intelligence in processes or machine tools e.g. modeling, data analysis, data fusion, etc.

  The Government is interested in proposals to support our “model centric” design environment to rapidly advance the state of the art in modeling, simulation, design, manufacturing, and field support of components for weapon systems. Specifically, the Government has interest in technologies that transition from development to production of advanced design methodologies, and ensure that this transition occurs seamlessly and with the greatest possible understanding of manufacturing process capability in relation to design intent. It will be essential to establish process capability relative to design intent baselines and goals (i.e., Cp, CpK) and put the disciplines, methodologies, and tools in place to meet these goals. Additionally, the Government is interested in design expertise, methodologies and tools to achieve “quality” hardware from the very start of production and throughout the program production life cycle. The expertise and tools may include the capability to define and flow complex requirements at the characteristic level through multiple layers of the supply chain. It will also include the ability to simulate optimum processes and tooling for material and machined parts, seamlessly document process capability in relation to design intent, and provide for continuing improvement of both design and manufacturing processes; and provide the capability to capture, link, trace, analyze, and manage requirements to manufacturing processes.

• 4. POWER AND ENERGY

  The Government has a need for efforts in the development and demonstration of Novel Power, Energy Harvesting, Energy Storage and Energy Management Systems, i.e., develop and demonstrate the critical components for improved reserve batteries, hybrid power sources, and other novel power sources to include micro generators, super and ultra-capacitors, power harvesting and power distribution concepts. Fuel cell and Lithium (or Li Ion) battery research and manufacturing technology development are also possible areas for projects.

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in materials and technology for sustainable energy and environmental protection. Specifically, the Government is interested in materials and technology that will provide for improved power density, energy efficiency, reduced logistics and/or weight burden, and overall sustainability of energy sources during military deployment, and with a clean environmental footprint. Additionally, future concepts will require technologies that support significantly extended range with performance at elevated temperatures, increased performance at cold temperatures, and the survivability of the Power and Energy subsystem through the dynamic launch event. Technologies of interest include, but are not limited to, those for power and energy conversion, power generation, energy storage and recovery, renewable energy, and hybrid intelligent management technologies.

  Materials of interest include, but are not limited to, coatings/materials to improve efficiency of photovoltaic and/or thermo-electric generators, novel materials for weight reduction and improved performance in batteries, materials for forward deployable sustainable energy systems, etc. Technologies proposed should demonstrate dual-use applications and have direct application to the Warfighter. Additionally, the Government is interested in innovative research that can lead to portable, efficient, and compact power technologies that enhance the military’s reach, decrease the logistical burden, and improve energy efficiency at all levels. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, innovative energy conversion, energy harvesting, micro- scale power sources, storage and recovery technologies, renewable energy, including solar and wind, energy harvesting/scavenging technologies, hybrid intelligent management technologies, alternative energy systems, fuel cells, and micro-grid forward deployable energy solutions. Also, the development of advanced novel electric and magnetic materials and coatings/materials that improve energy efficiency and enable sustainable power and energy technologies is of interest as well as novel coatings/materials for photovoltaic and thermo-electric generators, advanced nano- composites for turbine technology, enabling coatings/materials for advanced oil-free turbo- machinery or alternative approaches, or high temperature materials to reduce weight and increase efficiency of high temperature engines, novel battery materials, etc. In addition, the Government is interested in innovative research that can lead to portable, efficient, and compact power technologies that increase our military’s reach, decrease the logistics burden, and improve the overall efficiency of our war fighting forces, especially for distributed and net-centric operations.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are Improved thermal reserve and liquid reserve battery chemistries, micro-generators, capacitors, flexible/conformal batteries, thermoelectric materials, energy harvesting processes, batteries with improved cold weather performance (down to -40C), etc., while supporting significantly extended range, and performance at elevated temperatures.

• 5. ENERGETICS INNOVATION

  The Government is interested in advancing the state of the art in Energetic Material technology within the entire lifecycle of explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics, from concept through disposal. Potential areas of interest include new methodologies in modeling and simulation such as packages to calculate the performance and signature properties of propellants, pyrotechnics, or explosive properties of ideal and non-ideal explosives. In addition to modeling and simulation, the Government has a desire to build and test the new propellants. This would include both static and dynamic testing. The Government also has a need for new synthesis methods; design and synthesis of energetic molecules, oxidizers, and binders; novel scale up synthesis and crystallization techniques, new analysis methods and specification modernization, and non- CHNO very high energy density materials. In terms of energy output, novel concepts that result in much greater energy density and/or energy availability within timeframes and volumes of typical high performance explosive, pyrotechnic, and propellants is desired. Tailored and tailorable burn properties for propellants and pyrotechnic signatures are desired for a variety of systems. Multi-purpose effects from a single explosive or warhead are also desired, such as blast, fragmentation, metal pushing, and electromagnetic effects. In the realm of formulations for propellant, explosive, and pyrotechnics, there is a need for energetics and mixtures that exhibit extreme compressive strength and toughness; new binders and additives for pressing, curing, and strengthening formulations; tailored surface and mechanical properties, and improved aging and high temperature and severe environment resilience. Novel processing technologies are needed in the following areas: higher throughput of melt pour, cast cure, and pressed explosive, propellant, and pyrotechnic formulations; creation and characterization of amorphous and nanoscale formulations, filling advanced geometry warheads, and tailoring of flow properties.

  New ideas in the realm of novel disposal and energetics recycling and repurposing are also of interest, such as on-demand or reversible chemical bonding for demilitarization technologies.

  The Government has a need for development and demonstration of reliable energetic quality verification methods in an industrial environment. These efforts shall address both verification of bulk ingredients and final formulations. The demonstration shall include considerations of the issues resulting from increasing production quantities and sampling method selection decisions.

• 6. REVOLUTIONARY ARMAMENT DESIGN CONCEPTS

  The Government has the need for efforts that address the R&D of Advance Design Technologies. The technologies for R&D efforts include threat recognition, targeting, system communication of mission commands, remotely operated platforms, weapon systems and weapon systems security, control unit systems, battlefield automation systems, software/performance analysis, emerging software technologies, embedded systems, navigational guidance platforms, integrated user interfaces and processors, computer based systems, orientation and ranging technologies, enhanced software algorithm development and software sustainment/supportability as each relates to embedded software residency in weapons, improvements to existing systems and development of new systems, including the design, development, fabrication of hardware and electronics of these systems. Mission objectives are to enhance supported platforms, reliability, performance, capability, response time, and accuracy in meeting the Army’s Vision.

  As part of the Advanced Design Technologies, airframes that have the capability to maneuver more and fly further, plus reach targets at hyper-velocities, would be of interest. The airframes can also have embedded novel propulsion technology, in order to reach the targets in a faster time. Novel material technology shall be explored for the purpose of launch survivability for hypervelocity launches, for actuation, and for shape changing of the outer mold line during flight. The motivation behind shape changing is the elimination of moving parts such as actuators which can be a burden on internal volume, and also can be an expensive item for the munition. Maneuvering capabilities can be enhanced through the use of the advanced morphing materials, since macro changes on the body shape can be accomplished instead of relying on deflecting canards using conventional motors. Ultimately, it will be essential to validate the performance through testing.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Novel Propulsion Design

  b. Morphing airframes for optimizing maneuvers

  c. Advanced material for weight reduction and launch survivability improvement

• 7. FUZE TECHNOLOGY

  The Government is interested in next-generation technologies that will address pressing needs in fuze technology development. As seen below, miniaturization, reliability, manufacturability, and the ability to survive high “G” (G = acceleration of gravity) gun launch are critical attributes to be addressed. Specific research needs are outlined below.

  7.1 Initiation Technologies

  The Government has a need for research efforts addressing the R&D of in-line multi-point initiation technology that can accommodate 10’s of initiation points. Of specific interest are multi-point architectures that will scale up to 30-50 points of initiation while minimizing integration burden and volume in the warhead assembly. Initiation point simultaneity, selectivity and the ability to withstand gun launch “G” loads are key attributes that must be satisfied.

  The Government is also seeking technology for the research, development, integration and demonstration of improved Electronic Safe and Arm Devices (ESADs) and advanced ESAD components. Of specific interest are technologies that will reduce the technical risk and improve the reliability and performance of ESADs while also reducing the size and cost of ESADs. One goal of these technologies is to allow ESADs to be utilized in high-G hard target applications such as artillery and other indirect fire munitions. Miniaturized passive first-safety-environmental sensors are a priority along with the next generation of G- hardened Exploding Foil Initiators. Research to develop miniaturized, high voltage components such as low cost switches, capacitors, and transformers is also needed. Novel integration techniques that will reduce the cost or size of today's component technologies will also be considered.

  7.2 Improved Fuzes and Components for Hand Grenades, Sub-Munitions, Mortars and Artillery

  The Government is seeking proposals for the research and development of an improved miniature Micro-Electromechanical Systems (MEMS) Safe and Arm (S&A) device including necessary energetics for gun launched munitions. The ability to survive gun launch, size minimization and manufacturability are key attributes that the technology must address. The Government is also interested in research into design improvements for improved manufacturability including energetics integration into MEMS devices that can be used across the whole portfolio of munitions.

  The Government is also seeking proposals for the research into and the development of improved highly reliable sub-munition fuzes. Proposals should address improvements in the areas of design, manufacturability, loading, and assembly of sub-munition fuzes, and related components. The goal of this research is to increase the Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) of sub-munition fuze assembly to MRL6. This effort supports the development of Science & Technology (S&T) concepts under DEVCOM-AC’s Cluster Munition Replacement Technology effort.

  Further, the Government is seeking proposals for the research into and the development of fuzes and fuze components that will improve producibility, performance, accuracy, consistency or function requirements of hand grenades. Research will include development of prototype hardware components including, but are not limited to, fuze assemblies (inert or live), fuze bodies, levers, hinge pins, strikers, springs, pull pins, pull rings, energetic components or energetic compositions that will demonstrate improved capabilities such as pull-force, delay time, and fuze outputs along with improved producibility.

  7.3 Fuze Power Sources

  The Government is seeking proposals for research into the development of low cost, robust prototype power sources for advanced extended range munitions. The Government is interested in novel thermal and liquid reserve battery technologies and energy harvesting technologies that demonstrate extended run times greater than 3 minutes over temperature extremes of interest. Solutions which demonstrate a higher energy density and power density through integration of new electrode materials, insulation materials or novel construction of battery/power source are of interest to meet this requirement.

  7.4 Advanced Proximity / Height of Burst Sensors

  The Government is seeking proposals for research into the development and demonstration of advanced proximity / Height of Burst sensor systems capable of being integrated into munition systems. Areas of interest include Radio Frequency, Optical, and Image based proximity sensor technologies. Custom components for use in these systems are also of interest to include transmitters, receivers, apertures, and signal processors (digital and analog Application Specific Integrated Circuit). Solutions which demonstrate high levels of integration and being capable of integration into a wide variety of munitions are of highest interest.

  7.5 Fuze / Mission Setters

  The Government is seeking proposals for research and development of secure spread spectrum wireless fuze mission setting capability. Also of interest is wireless power transfer for systems within near field ranges (less than 10m). Demonstration of this technology would be in support of long range precision fires auto-loader integration goals within the Army.
  

• 8. AUTONOMY; GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL

  The Department of Defense, DOD, has been for many years been researching, developing and manufacturing smart munitions that can withstand thousands of “g” loads during launch. The development of these munitions has focused in areas such of power, electronics, inertial measurements, actuators, rocket motors and seekers. The DOD has been able to make great strides in all these areas with the result being the testing, manufacturing and fielding of gun launched smart munitions for the U.S. Army. With that said, areas such as autonomy, and state- of-the-art guidance, navigation and control technologies will need significant R&D efforts.

  Since there is a need for long range precision guidance, technologies that will enable a munition to fly faster and further, be more accurate in acquiring targets, with the ability to conduct midcourse corrections (with and without the use of GPS), will be essential. Autonomy can be introduced into the field of operations by designing a munition that is not only smart, due to its electronics and navigation, but will also have the ability to communicate with other munitions in flight. An example may be a leader / follower scenario where you have several smart munitions that are fired in a volley. The leader munition will then be communicating with the other munitions, and will be providing them with information of targets so they, in turn, can make corrections in flight in order to prosecute various targets. This area is a new field of study called “Collaborative Control”. Because of the increase in launch velocities needed for longer ranges, longer flight times and enhanced maneuverability to go after moving targets, R&D efforts to define more accurate robust navigation and position transmission technologies will be necessary especially if munitions need to communicate with one another. Methods of accurately measuring the projectile flight dynamics can include state-of-the-art technologies that will improve projectile on board state estimation without GPS satellite data. In this GPS denied scenario, terrain mapping can be a method in improving accuracy. With that said, downloading maps to the munition, and having the munition recognize optically the sites on the ground in order to improve its position estimation will be of critical importance. Another possibility can be to use celestial navigation in conjunction with terrain mapping. However, there is a need for innovative research into terrain mapping, celestial navigation or other state of the art methods in order to improve accuracy for the smart munitions.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES:

  a. Collaborative Control

  b. Terrain mapping for position estimation accuracy

  c. Celestial navigation

• 9. DISRUPTIVE LETHALITY CONCEPTS

  The Government is interested in research into next generation warhead and lethal mechanism technologies that contribute to providing more energy on target, enabling multi-domain lethality against a wide range of target sets, and maintaining lethality as warhead volumes are reduced in size to accommodate other munition system components.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest is research to develop the technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Warhead scaling effects and optimization

  b. Fabrication using novel materials

  c. Advanced modeling & simulation capabilities that account for the use of novel materials

  d. Collaborative lethal effects

  e. Warheads with multiple modes of operation

  f. Novel initiation schemes

  g. Survivability in extreme environments

  h. Advanced fragmentation

  i. Split Hopkinson Bar Technology

  j. Advanced lethality modeling

  k. Long standoff, aero-stable warhead concepts

  l. Anti-armor warhead concepts

  m. Counter-UAS/Counter-RAM technologies

  n. Advanced warhead testing and diagnostic capabilities description

• 10. ADVANCED FIRE CONTROL

  The U.S. Army is interested in research proposals related to emerging Fire Control technology. Specific areas for research include: (1) Advanced Technical Fire Control; (2) Position / Navigation; (3) Advanced Algorithms; (4) Advanced System Controllers; (5) Biometric and Human Machine Interface Technologies; (6) Photonics and Quantum Science Technologies, and (7) Live, Virtual and Embedded Fire Control Trainers

  Specific research needs are outlined below.

  10.1 Advanced Technical Fire Control

  The Government is in need of research to develop direct view Optics, Electro-Optic, Sighting systems or their components in support of the military’s mission to provide superior military equipment to our warfighters. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Develop Optics material and/or equipment

  b. Develop state of the art electro-optics, fiber-optics and sighting system technologies

  c. Advance study of threat capabilities

  d. Develop better understanding from analysis gained from experimentation

  e. Air & Ground Platform Signature Reduction

  f. Dismounted Target Acquisition Optical Capability

  g. Improved Soldier Protection

  h. Sensor/effects packages (to deny access to critical points and provide force protection)

  i. Soldier Signature Reduction

  j. Use modeling and simulation to determine survivability

  k. Bio-mimicry advances in flexible Photo-detectors, Smart Optics, Adaptive Optics, Advanced Weapon Sight (aiming reticle)

  l. Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS)

  m. Improved Situational Awareness

  n. Improved position sensors

  For the Advanced Technical Fire Control subtopic the Government is in need of research to develop direct view Optics and new sighting technologies in support of the military’s mission and ground based platforms.

  10.2 Position / Navigation

  The Government is in need of research to develop position or navigation sensors such as, but not limited to, non-magnetic compasses, gyroscopes, inclinometers and accelerometers in support of the military’s mission to provide superior military equipment to our Warfighters.

  This research is directed to advance the capabilities of PNT (Position, Navigation, Timing). The emphasis is to develop advancements in laser gyros, next-Gen ASIC chipsets and capabilities to function in anti-spoof and anti-jam environments.

  10.3 Advanced Algorithms

  10.3.1

  Architecture

  The Government is in need of research to demonstrate rapid sensor-to-shooter target hand-off at all echelons that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics include:

  a. Reduced soldier/leader cognitive work load

  b. Seamless integration of manned and unmanned effects assets

  c. GPS denied soldier tracking

  d. Lethal UV integration

  10.3.2 Target Acquisition

  The Government is in need of research to demonstrate an auto-tracker in small, medium and large weapon sighting systems and improved target range information that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Closed Loop Fire Control / Data Links

  b. Projectile tracking and closed loop improvement

  c. Correcting for miss distances

  d. Target State Estimation (TSE) / Prediction

  e. Auto Tracking

  f. Auto / Aided Cueing

  g. Aiming Aides

  h. Ballistic Algorithms / Computation

  i. Advanced Meteorological Measurements and Prediction

  j. Multiple/many target handing/prioritization (ie swarm)

  k. Automated target detection, recognition and identification

  10.4 Advanced System Controllers

  The Government is in need of research to develop an innovative system controller that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any threats. Research topics of interest are:

  a. Small Footprint

  b. Reduced Power Consumption

  c. Ruggedization Technology

  d. LRM Form Factor

  e. Expandable Interfaces

  f. Standard Architecture

  g. Simultaneous Multiple OS

  h. Self-Diagnosing/Self Reporting BIT

  i. Remote Display/User Input Capability via Standard Interface (e.g. Ethernet)

  10.5 Biometric and Human Machine Interface Technologies

  a. The Government is in need of research to develop biometric and human to machine interface systems for Armament Systems or the individual components that can support the military’s mission to protect the nation and/or the warfighter from any potential threats. Research topics of interest include: Sensors that can collect biometric information, while on the move and/or stationary, about personnel, or other potential threats.

  b. Software and/or hardware systems that can store, analyze biometric data, detect and/or classify threats, and/or any other information useful for the warfighter

  c. Weapon systems with biometrics capabilities

  d. Human machine sensor interface technologies that can receive and/or provide input directly between weapon systems and warfighter organic sensor network

  e. Brain machine interface technologies that allow neurologic link directly between warfighter and fire control systems

  10.6 Photonics and Quantum Science Technologies

  The Government is in need of research to develop photonics and quantum science technologies for Armament Applications. Some areas of interest are:

  a. Photonics and quantum based technologies for potential Fire Control Technologies including but not limited to target acquisition and tracking, signature reduction, and potential spoofing technology.

  b. Integrated photonics for the reduction of size, weight, and power for Fire Control and other Armament Systems.

  c. Advanced computer hardware technologies for high performance, power efficient computing, particularly in austere environments.

  d. Photonics and quantum based technologies for the next generation of PNT technologies for Armament applications.

  e. Target acquisition technologies for obscured targets, either obscured by environment or camouflage.

  f. Photonics technologies for the advanced control of laser wave fronts for Fire Control applications.

  g. Software technologies appropriate for the analysis of low photon target image processing and associated machine learning approaches for target recognition.

  h. Photonics technologies for laser protection.

  10.7 Live, Virtual and Embedded Fire Control Trainers

  The Government is in need of research to develop embedded interfaces and advanced visualization systems that utilize fire control systems for areas of live, virtual and embedded training that meets the military's need to maintain readiness of the warfighter as expert system operators and able to maximize lethality potentials of armament systems. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Computer vision and graphics

  b. Small Footprint

  c. Ruggedization Technologies

  d. Low bandwidth secure networking

  In conclusion - For the Advanced Fire Control Topic: Of unique interest at this time is research associated with the following:

  a. Unmanned & autonomous systems that can provide advancements in target info to Fire Control

  b. Sensor fusion methods and networks to increase fire control and diagnostic effectiveness

  c. Down range wind sensors

  d. Dynamic Fires Planning and Execution

  e. Real time localized MET and environmental data for Fire Control corrections

• 11. NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS AND SUPPORTABILITY TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government is interested in proposals for advancing the state of the art in force sustainment capabilities technologies that enhance armament supportability; ammunition health monitoring; ammunition packaging, storage, transportation and handling; ammunition forecasting; weapon rearm / resupply; battlefield manufacturing; sense and respond supply chain management technologies and methodologies that directly support providing Warfighters with the armaments, ammunition, and other equipment they need, when they need them and in the right condition.

  Specifically, the Government is interested in research into technologies and approaches that address the planning, setup and operation of supply nodes, tools based on best practices to evaluate and optimize the performance of supply operations throughout the entire armament and ammunition enterprise, and aggressive sustainment capabilities to improve the responsiveness and agility of sustainment operations at all echelons.

  The Government is also interested in researching technologies that provide ammunition health monitoring capabilities to understand the readiness of the ammunition stockpile and to ensure only fully functional ammunition items are issued and utilized. These monitoring capabilities may address exposure to (but not limited to) temperature, vibration, shock, humidity, and radiation, as they effect both existing and/or developmental systems.

  The Government requires technologies that help analyze, interpret, and evaluate the supportability implications of a system; predictive maintenance technologies; and technologies that improve how a system is supported. Additionally, the Government is interested in technologies and approaches to allow for quicker and advanced battlefield manufacturing processes and materials. Finally, the Government is interested in technologies that allow for automated rearm and resupply of armament systems.

  The research may address any or all aspects of the supply chain including production, transport, storage (short and long term), supply node operations, tactical distribution, and retrograde. The proposals may span from software/AI based planning, optimization and execution tools, to hardware-based distribution enablers to hybrid electro-mechanical systems, or any combination thereof technologies that improve how armament systems are supported.

  The Government has the need to establish and expand its quality presence in mitigating supply chain cybersecurity risks in the development, test and deployment of both software intensive systems (including hardware) whether for weapon system application, information system deployment or manufacturing internal control systems (hardware and software). We are looking for research into strategies equivalent up to and including, the State-of-the-Art Resource for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation, a.k.a. the “Software SOAR,” program, for software assurance, and analogous strategies for hardware assurance. The ultimate goal of the research is for the AC to become competent and relevant practitioners in the deployment of solutions for supply chain challenges from both an information and an operation technology perspective.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES:

  a. Environmental sensing, recording and logging technologies

  b. Systems to collect data from sensors that monitor the environment that an armament system and ammunition have been exposed to

  c. AI-based systems to manage the health of the ammunition stockpile through analyzing large datasets

  d. AI-based systems to aid with storage, planning and execution of the movement of ammunition horizontally and vertically throughout the ammunition supply chain against current and forecasted needs/consumptions

  e. AI-based systems to aid in the identification and prediction of supportability drivers and considerations for armament systems

  f. AI-based systems to provide predictive maintenance and repair information and solutions

  g. AI-based systems to aid in design and development processes

  h. Planning and execution hardware and software systems to optimize the planning and operation of supply nodes and maintenance facilities at all echelons

  i. AI based planning and execution systems that assist in planning and executing armament sustainment/movement operations

  j. AI based planning and execution systems that specifically target tactical ammunition distribution operations to ensure the ammunition supply chain is efficient, agile and responsive in direct support of tactical operations

  k. Systems that improve the ability to retrograde ammunition

  l. Material technologies for container/palletization

  m. Packaging/Pallet designs and interfaces that allow for more efficient containerization, palletization, or transportation of ammunition

  n. Hardware and software technologies that allow for faster printing and high fidelity of 3D printed parts

  o. AI-based decision systems to determine best supply alternative (Rapid Fabrication in field, DLA, local source, cannibalization, etc.) for repair to achieve optimum readiness

  p. Hardware and software technologies that allow for automated rearm and resupply

  q. Automated tracking of expenditures of serial–numbered items

  r. Solutions that monitor and prevent Cyber-attacks on the supply chain

  s. Data collection and analytical systems that determine optimal use of appropriate personnel and skills necessary to support armament systems

  t. Solutions that identify need for new, refresher, remedial, or other training for users of armament systems and then can deliver the exact training needed, when it is needed, in the most efficient manner

  u. Solutions to aid in the identification/prediction of obsolescence of hardware and software components for armament systems

• 12. ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEMIL TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government has interest in research into innovative technologies that improve environmental sustainability of life cycle stages for weapons and weapons systems. This includes manufacturing, production, maintenance, storage, use, demilitarization and disposal of ordnance such as mortars, flares, smokes, grenades, ammunition, energetics and explosives.

  Innovative technologies are intended to lead to new capabilities that improve Military readiness while protecting human health and the environment.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with the following:

  a. Wastewater treatment to reduce or eliminate soluble and insoluble concentrations of compounds such as RDX, HMX, DNAN, NTO, ANSOL, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia and other explosives and explosive degradation products

  b. Identify and eliminate emerging contaminants in munitions such as PFAS, hexavalent chromium, asbestos and methods to prevent air, water, or soil contamination during disposal by open burn, open detonation or incineration

  c. Process modeling or other methods to better understand treatment mechanisms and improved prediction of outcomes and effects on environmental safety and human health (ESOH)

  d. Novel technologies for enabling stand-off, remote or autonomous methods to disarm, and disassemble known, unknown, or undocumented munitions

  e. Research on the use of artificial intelligence for process control and predictive operations

  f. Surveillance methods to monitor the condition of air emissions, wastewater quality, and effectiveness of demilitarization processes to ascertain compliance with regulatory requirements

  g. Novel engineering to improve processing rates

  h. Innovative technologies for closed disposal of munitions

  i. Simultaneous demilitarization and disposal of mixed ordnance

  j. Research for methods to reduce impact of open burn or open detonation disposal of energetic and non-energetic materials on human health and the environment

  k. Eliminate the use of toxic chemicals such as Cr+6 based (hexavalent chromium) surface treatments used on weapon system components to include but not limited to gun barrels, recoil mechanisms, aircraft landing gear assemblies, etc. These processes shall be environmentally-compliant and provide equivalent, or better, performance as compared to Cr+6 -based surface treatments.

• 13. BIOMETRIC COLLECTION, MATCHING, ANALYSIS & SHARING

  DEVCOM-AC provides the Software Supportability mission for the PEO IEWS, PM DoD Biometrics - Biometrics Enabling Capabilities program of record. Consequently, the Government has the need for research into the development of biometric and identification technology. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art in the ability to detect, identify, characterize, and track items, activities, conditions, and events worldwide which will provide direct benefit to the warfighter. The Government has the need research efforts that analyze, improve, verify and validate biometric technology supporting the collect, match, analysis, and sharing functions of the DoD’s Biometrics Enterprise, including next generation tactical handheld collection devices. Current biometric technologies assist in providing these capabilities but are limited to the degree of which they can scale and meet future needs. More advanced biometric collection, storage, matching, analysis, and sharing systems will allow the Government enhanced situational awareness, and identity superiority on the battlefield for today’s mission as well as mission requirements far into the future.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Fingerprint, Face, Iris, Palm, Voice, DNA capture, feature extraction, templating, and matching

  b. Modular, scalable, lightweight, and portable imaging platforms

• 14. CONTAINERIZED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS & ORCHESTRATION

  The Government has the need for research efforts in the advancement of software container and container orchestration technology to increase the development, deployment, scalability and cybersecurity, of software applications of any size. Current software applications are difficult to scale and secure flexibly as mission requirements change resulting in significant requirements, architecture, design and implementation rework when using traditional software development technology and methodologies. Container & container orchestration technology will provide the Government modern capabilities to rapidly, flexibly, and securely deliver solutions to the warfighter at an unprecedented scale. Leveraging containerized software applications & orchestration supports the DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Initiative and USD AT&L Better Buying Power.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of unique interest at this time are technologies associated with the following concepts:

  a. Open Standards Compliant, Cloud Agnostic Container and Container Orchestration

  b. Embedded Application & Safety Critical Container Implementations

• 15. GOVERNMENT CLOUD SOFTWARE FACTORIES ENABLING DEVSECOPS

  The Government has the need for basic and applied research in support of leveraging Government owned and managed cloud based software factories enabling and promoting the use of DevSecOps to increase the development, testing, accreditation, and Authority To Operate approval of modern software applications. DevSecOps is the union of people, process, and products to enable continuous delivery of value to end users including cybersecurity accreditation. Current software development processes & tools in use by DEVCOM-AC require far too much manual human involvement which adds cost, time, and risk to the process of rapidly developing, deploying, and maintaining quality software. Under the current cybersecurity and fiscal austerity landscapes, usage of DevSecOps concepts has become prohibitive for organizations to manage locally. Basic & applied research is required to determine the best GOTS, open source, and COTS tools specific to the application domain that would benefit the most from its use as well as developing best practices for implementation and widespread usage in an organic Government software development environment with additional classification, safety, cybersecurity restrictions currently not experienced by most organization implementing DevSecOps today. Government cloud based software factories enabling DevSecOps will allow organic developers of modern technology the ability to learn, fail, and remediate fast to deliver modern capabilities to the warfighter that have been continuously accredited to minimize the risk of adversarial exploitation that will soon touch all aspects of software development at

  DEVCOM-AC. Leveraging Government cloud software factories & DevSecOps supports the DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Initiative and USD AT&L Better Buying Power.

• 16. SMALL ARMS LETHAL TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government has the need for applied research efforts in the development of future Small Arms Lethal Technologies and capabilities. This shall include novel approaches and solutions to make the individual Warfighter or Platform more lethal against lightly armored, infantry level targets. This includes advanced technologies which will increase probabilities of hit and incapacitation, while decreasing the overall time to engagement. The Government has the need for applied scientific studies and experimentation directed toward increased knowledge of desired metrics with regards to weapon operation and maintenance, weapon signature, ammunition (interior, exterior, and terminal ballistics), fire control (acquiring targets, determining range, marking/tracking), and human factors / maneuverability. The research technologies should address the battlefield for today’s mission as well as mission requirements far into the future.

  EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES: Of particular interest at this time are unique technologies that address:

  a. Training, Aides, Devices, Simulators, and Simulations (TADSS)

  b. Ergonomics and Human-Systems Interface

  c. Increased Maneuverability

  d. Breaching

  e. Weapon System Power

  f. Networked Weapon Systems

  g. Remote and Externally Powered Weapon Systems

  h. Advanced Weapon and Battlefield Sensors

  i. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Algorithmic Computation

  j. Aim Augmentation

  k. Counter UAS/UGS

  l. Weapon System Controllability

  m. Advanced Weapon System Operation Technologies

  n. Barrel Technologies

  o. Weapon System Signature Reduction

  p. Subterranean and Dense Urban Environments

  q. Interior Ballistics

  r. Exterior Ballistics and Guidance, Navigation and Control

  s. Terminal Ballistics

  t. Counter Defilade

  u. Alternate Incapacitation Mechanisms

• 17. DIGITAL ENGINEERING

  The Government is interested in research relative to Digital Engineering technologies, specifically technologies that support the development, management, and use of the Digital Thread. The Digital Thread is the product’s data and their relationships captured as links or connections over the course of the product’s lifecycle. Product data includes CAD, software, requirements, architecture, documents, engineering analysis, and production data. The ability to integrate product data across various engineering disciplines enables the generation of the Digital Thread, a driving factor for successful implementation of Digital Engineering, which is a major thrust area for the U.S. Army and DoD. Technologies that facilitate the integration of data and models across the product life-cycle are of interest.

  The Government seeks to advance the state-of-the-art and/or increase knowledge in how disparate engineering models and data can be "integrated" or linked together regardless of any specific software tool the models and data are created or stored in. Of particular interest at this time are technologies associated with semantic integrations across different domain-specific modeling languages, across various levels of model fidelity and multiple levels of abstraction. Other technologies of interest include tool-agnostic Data Exchange Standards, Linked-Data, Ontologies, Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC), Application Programming Interfaces (API’s), and Extract-Transform-Load technologies.

• 18. TESTING METHODOLOGY

  The Government has the need for research efforts addressing destructive and non-destructive testing technology. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art for performing natural and induced environmental testing of explosive and inert armaments, munitions, and fire control devices at the system and component levels, and developing and implementing new non- destructive evaluation techniques for product evaluation (including, but not limited to: ultrasonic, Eddy current, Radiography, Mag particle, Penetrant, thermography, acoustic emission); dimensional analysis; joining technology; and additive manufacturing.

  The Government has the need for research efforts addressing advanced capabilities associated with armament system ballistic test and evaluation (T&E). These efforts shall address the complete infrastructure associated with a fully functional state-of-the-art ballistic test facility. Focus shall be on improving T&E efficiency by reducing cycle time, increasing the reliability of data capture, minimizing environmental impact, incorporating state-of-the-art instrumentation and technique and integrating virtual participation while maintaining the standards required by Government regulation and licensing permits. Introduction of novel T&E equipment and methodology is encouraged.

  The Government also has the need for research into physical inspection in support of non- destructive testing. The efforts shall address new developments in programmable inspection equipment (CMM, laser scanners, Romer Arms, and hand/held portable devices) which allow for increasingly efficient inspections with high levels of accuracy. Additionally, advancements in this area will be considered for use in expedited resolution of malfunction investigations as well as reverse engineering applications.

  Recognizing that certain work activities need to continue even in light of a pandemic, the Government would like to explore ideas or industry and/or academia experiences with virtual monitoring, and lab sharing. Most of the software testing is conducted with a computer, tablet, or electronic equipment (oscillation scope, power supply, etc.). Most equipment has an output port to a screen, which means that whatever is on the screen can be broadcast with conference/chat software. Video recording/streaming can also be utilized to stream the test events. Independent verification & validation subject matter experts should be able to monitor the screen remotely instead of witnessing the software testing physically. In light of the current health concerns which calls for social distancing and remote work activity, the need for office space is lessoned. If this strategy can be made effective and efficient it can be continued even after the current crisis has subsided. We must also recognize that testing requires a person to operate the equipment even during a pandemic. How do we design a safe space for a single person or necessary team to operate under such conditions as well?

  The Government has the need for efforts addressing automated SW testing technology especially within Agile SW development environments. This shall include efforts that advance the state of the art for planning and executing automated SW testing and developing/implementing new SW automation techniques (ex. AI) for verification and validation of Armament and IT SW. Strategies must explore and/or identify automated tools that can aid in code reviews/analysis, white, grey and black box test activities. The automatic test equipment and deployment strategy must identify skill levels and training requirements for usage to include cost and license requirements.

• 19. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  The Government has a need for efforts in research and development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) software and systems. This shall include research and development in algorithms and AI models, resiliency of deep learning algorithms, and mitigation to attacks against AI. Key additional aspects include research on identification of poisoned data sets and input manipulation impacts, and identification of critical features. Current AI models have shown weakness to specialized adversarial attacks, which lead to invalid and detrimental results for the user.

  The Government is also interested in research that address the ability to understand and explain an AI model for adherence to trust, ethical, and safe utilization. This should include an understanding of why an AI model generates specific outputs and the confidence level in understanding that reason. Many AI models do not have the ability to provide enough “understanding" for a user or evaluator to understand how a specific decision was reached.

  The Government has a need for research to address the development of certification of data sets for Artificial Intelligence training, validation, and testing. Areas of interest include technologies and approaches that address, but are not limited to, certifying data sets are complete and competent for a given program and developing the means to ensure that the test and evaluation of an AI enabled system has satisfactory coverage of expected stimuli and potential outcomes to ensure the fielding of safe, suitable, and supportable materiel. Applications may include image recognition, decision making, prioritization, and resource management.

  The Government is also interested research into alternative software quality models for use with software systems that incorporate or rely on Artificial Intelligence or machine learning solutions to achieve system functions and capabilities. This shall include research into algorithm and AI model development, resiliency of deep learning algorithms, and mitigation to attacks against AI. Models shall utilize metrics for machine learning solutions in lieu of traditional software traceability. Such models shall ensure the requirements are satisfied by expected functionality to predefined levels and present a comprehensive list of all potential failure outcomes should the system behave in an unexpected way. As a result of the research software developers would have a path for certifying the quality of a software system employing various levels of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning without being hindered by the lack of traceability. The Government is also interested in a new acceptance standard for an AI based system that permits software to be evaluated without concrete traceability from requirement, through the source code to the function.

• 20. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

  The purpose of this area is to identify user requirements and operational deficiencies in a variety of operational areas that are amenable to solution through application and exploitation of the existing technology base. The intent is, to the greatest extent possible, to leverage existing technologies and where possible provide for early application and entry of these technologies in to the field. Concomitant with this need is the requirement to actually solve identified problems and deficiencies. These solutions will often take the form of complex, multi-disciplinary and multi- agency collaborations, to include Government, industry and academe. However, due to the complex nature of these collaborations, it will be necessary to have single, or very limited, spans of control, coordinating these efforts to optimize the resources spent and return to the Government on investment, yet still efficiently and effectively meeting the needs of the end user.

  To most effectively meet this evolving mission area, it will be necessary to assess, evaluate, and exploit existing resources and capabilities, focusing on integrating in innovative and unconventional ways existing and evolving technologies, but also being able to identify and implement research plans to fill gaps in existing tech base capabilities and resources.

  However, where it is not practical or desirable to use existing tech base resources, accelerated efforts building on already existing programs will be employed. Particular emphasis will be applied to the various and diverse array of technologies and programs extant within a variety of environments, including but not limited to DOD and other Governmental agencies. While the focus is on long range, high risk, high-payoff programs there are nonetheless numerous opportunities for early transition of programs towards focused requirements. Effort will be made to identify both candidate technologies and programs to which this paradigm will apply. Failing this, however, focused research efforts to fulfill specific needs and bridge identified gaps in the tech base, will be implemented. Ultimately, final efforts will consist of a combination of acquisition, advanced development and basic research, all focused on achieving an end capability to fulfill a defined deficiency.

  Scientific and Technical Areas of Interest:

  Assessment of the needs of the various user communities has shown value in providing support for technology identification and program management and integration functions in a variety of areas. These areas include the following:

  20.1 Research proposals for advanced and innovative technology review

  This would include maintaining an understanding and innovative utilization capability of advanced technologies. Efforts might consist of supporting and coordinating meetings with other Government agencies, contractors, and educational institutions, as well as any other source of information or technology deemed useful. These meetings will provide a primary source of information concerning both technologies and requirements.

  20.2 Research proposals for technology utilization support

  This would include the process of identifying and analysis of opportunities for Government program managers, as well as evaluating transition potential for existing and new technologies. Efforts would include gathering and correlation of data on a wide array of technologies, as well as assisting in assembly and evaluation of requirements from all users. Other efforts might include obtaining various technologies, through whatever means appear appropriate, and assess and evaluate their utility. This will be done through a variety of means including purchase, custom-design, development, and integration of existing systems. Evaluation will be under a variety of conditions including operational and laboratory.

  20.3 Research proposals for the prototyping, manufacturing, assessment and delivery of systems for use by the Government

  Efforts would focus on use of various technologies transitioned from other arenas. Efforts may include location and identification, analysis and assessment, assembly of multi- disciplinary teams and management of integrated efforts to achieve an end capability in as optimal manner as possible.

  20.4 Research proposals to evaluate operational environments and requirements Efforts would focus on supporting the evaluation of operational environments for determination of technology transition and support opportunities. These might include observation, participation, and evaluation and analysis of operational situations, primarily involving training scenarios, but potentially involving actual operational missions. Mission areas may include military, Federal Agency, and civilian missions as appropriate and required.

  20.5 Research proposals to develop and implement processes for rapid response and prototyping needs of critical, high priority missions

  Focus would be on developing a capability to meet rapid response to prototyping requirements as well as assist in the methodology implementation of a wide array of users and mission oriented agencies. This will include evaluation of existing capabilities, development of a method of scheduling and coordination of work, support of design conception and implementation, managing of the manufacturing process, evaluation final product and iterative design changes as required to meet user needs.

  20.6 Research proposal focused for the integration and implementation of multi- disciplinary, multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional integrated efforts to meet complex program needs

  This would include the analysis and identification of key problems and solution approaches, the creation of integrated program implementation and problem solution plans, and the overall management of resources, assets, and creation of programs to meet these needs. This may include a combination of in-house assets and resources, subcontracting to various industrial and academic centers, and coordination and collaboration of and with various Government agencies and organizations. The efforts will consist of overall analysis, management and integration of highly complex and diverse resources to meet the needs of the end user. This process may culminate in products ranging from prototypes of materiel solutions through complete delivery and IOC to analysis and recommendations of doctrinal or procedural changes.

• 21. NETWORKED LETHALITY

  21.1 Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (AI/ML)

  Armaments Center is seeking AI/ML algorithms to continuously analyze the data in the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE), display ongoing trends and predict where future events may occur. These AI/ML algorithms can be further extended for Course of Action (COA) recommendation based on the output of the aforementioned trend analysis.

  AI/ML algorithms should take into the following data attributes at a minimum in the analysis of trends and COA recommendations: account for temporal and geospatial tagged data, confidence level of data, and source of data.

  21.2 Intelligent Networking

  The Armaments Center is seeking a method to manage data transmission over a Disconnected, Intermittent, and Low Bandwidth (DIL) network. In a tactical environment, sometimes network connectivity can be extremely limited and, at times, intermittent. In these situations, prioritizing the data going over the network becomes extremely important.

  A solution that notifies the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) operator of the network characteristics/changes and impact on data transmission is desired. The solution should allow the CPCE administrator to determine which prioritized data to transmit for a given scenario, or if certain CPCE front end capabilities should be suspended.

  21.3 Cloud Computing

  The Armaments Center is seeking solutions to architect the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) to operate in a cloud environment, to include the Amazon’s Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure clouds. This effort would take a look at leveraging some of the native cloud services when CPCE is deployed in a Cloud environment. We would look to leverage native Cloud services such as Azure Kubernetes Services, Azure Active Directory, Azure SQL Database, Azure Container Registry, and Azure Key Vault (or equivalent AWS or other Cloud services).

  21.4 Containerization

  The Armaments Center is looking for ways to reduce the Size, Weight, Power, and Cost (SWaP-C) characteristics of the Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) through the utilization of containers. Additionally, containers will increase performance while minimizing resource utilization. The resulting solution will demonstrate the CPCE software and services running in containers, while identifying the SWaP-C savings.

• 22. WEAPONS SYSTEMS

  The Government is interested in research and development of small, medium, large caliber, non- lethal and directed energy weapon systems and its subsystems. These weapon systems include artillery, mounted mortars, infantry/soldier-borne armaments, combat vehicle mounted armaments, directed energy weapons, electro-magnetic weapon system, force protection weapon system, counter explosive hazard armaments, air defense armaments, and aircraft weapons systems; for both lethal and non-lethal applications.

  These include hand guns, rifles, carbines, machine guns, chain guns, crew served weapons, grenade launchers, multi-barrel Gatling guns, remote/robotic weapons systems and gun pods, mounted mortars, cannon caliber indirect fire systems (e.g. towed artillery and self-propelled artillery), electro-magnetic launch systems, non-lethal weapons/devices, and directed energy weapon systems (e.g. High Power Microwave, Radio Frequency weapons, laser weapons, high voltage/electrostatic discharge weapons) to damage/destroy materiel targets.

  Weapon systems components or subsystems include: cradles, gun mounts, gimbals, gun pods, manned/unmanned turrets, bi-pods, tri-pods, recoil mechanisms, elevation and traverse systems, equilibrators, suppressors, mounting rails, upper carriages, lower carriages, cabs, gun drives, electronic control systems, ammunition handling and loading systems, laser ignition systems, HPM/Radio Frequency (RF) sources, beam control, antennas, pulse power components, power supplies, operator station and controls, fire control integration, and supporting hydraulic, electric, structural, and protective subsystems.

• 23. ADVANCED MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGIES

  The Government is in need of research to develop advanced at platform automated maintenance systems that can support the Government's mission to protect the nation and / or warfighter from any potential threats with maintaining operational armament systems. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Visual and Audio Interfaces

  b. Non-intrusive sensors

  c. Secure Wireless Communications

  d. Real-time Machine Learning Sensor Data Analytics

  e. Artificial Intelligence Fault Resolution Algorithms

  f. Secure distributed data collection

• 24. AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS (ATS) TECHNOLOGY

  The Government is in need of research to develop advanced automated test systems and sub- systems that can support maintaining readiness and availability of DoD platforms and achieve the goals of the National Defense Strategy. Some of the areas for research are:

  a. Electrical Optical test

  b. Radio Frequency test

  c. Augmented reality in automated test

  d. Parallel Test

  e. Cybersecurity

  f. Mechanical/Electrical Sensors

  g. Prognostics Data Collection Technology

• 25. ADVANCED MUNITION PAYLOADS

  As future engagements shift, a focus of smart munitions that include advanced payloads and deployed sensor packages will be necessary. The Government has a need for multi-unit collaboration among deployed assets while utilizing artificial intelligence during autonomous mission engagements. In order to prosecute missions, the USG has an interest in the following, but not limited to, topics:

  a. Advanced Target Recognition

  b. Vision Based Navigation for Unmanned Aerial and Terrestrial based Systems (UAS and UGV)

  c. Obstacle Avoidance

  d. Mission Prioritization

  e. Collaborative Engagement.

• 26. OPERATIONS RESEARCH SYSTEM ANALYSIS (ORSA) MODELING & SIMULATION TOOLS

  The Government is interested in enhancements and state of the art developments in Operations Research System Analysis (ORSA) and Modeling and Simulation (M&S) frameworks, models, methods, analysis and toolsets in support of weapon system evaluations in a Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) context.

  Item Level including sub-system model characterization (source code or black box executable) with an emphasis on novel warhead technology methodology and assessments, enhancements to existing M&S framework including high fidelity threat system modeling, and improvement to visualizations of simulation outputs.

  Operational Level including force on force combat simulations and visualizations, stand-alone or federated over High Level Architecture (HLA) / Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) protocols providing battlefield assessments of current and future weapon system technologies.

  Applications of methods, models and tools supporting a live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) modeling paradigm, incorporating of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning techniques and algorithms into combat models including sensor / shooter pairings and decision making, agent behaviors, and advanced targeting techniques.

• 27. JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE ARMAMENTS AND AMMUNITION (JPEO A&A) ITEM RESEARCH

  The Armaments Center intends that this BAA be used as a research tool for efforts in support of the Joint Program Executive Office Armaments and Ammunition (JPEO A&A) and the general items under their control. Note 1 below outlines the JPEO A&A organization. Note 2 lists the general items of interest, and associated technologies with a summary of short, mid, and long term objectives. Note 3 provides the specific needs of the Assured Precision Munitions branch of the JPEO A&A.

  Note 1: The JPEO A&A is organized under the following Program Management (PM) offices:

  • Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems (CAS)

  • Project Manager Close Combat Systems (CCS)

  • Project Manager Maneuver Ammunition Systems (MAS)

  • Project Lead Joint Services

  • OEDCA- Executive Director Conventional Ammunition

  ➢ Single Manager for Conventional Ammo (SMCA)

  Note 2: General items of interest and associated technologies of interest for R&D efforts, some with short through long term objectives:

  1.Flares & Signals

  a. Tunable countermeasures (multi-purpose)

  b. Fully tunable effects (user selectable)

  2.Tank Ammo

  a. Depleted Uranium (DU) alternates

  b. Advanced Kinetic Energy (KE) and Advanced Multi-Purpose (AMP) technology

  c. Guided extended range for advanced targets

  3.Small Caliber

  a. Extended range guided with user tunable effects

  b. “Trace” capability in smart sight on the weapon vs. on the round

  c. “Ammo on demand” for User to “produce” the ammo as needed

  4.Artillery & Mortars

  a. Advancing the capabilities of precision cannon munitions

  b. Alternative Navigation (Alt-Nav) correction algorithms

  c. Ultra-Long range and Hyper-Velocity artillery

  d. Autonomous Networked Weapons

  5.Demolition

  a. Non-kinetic neutralization of explosives from standoff

  6.Bomb Technology

  7.Medium Caliber

  a. Collaborative/swarming effects

  b. “Ammo on Demand” logistics improvements

  8.Non-Lethal Technology

  9.Counter Explosive Hazard (CEH)

  a. Increased speed, autonomous operations and standoff for detection marking; associated lower cost technologies

  b. Detection and non-kinetic neutralization of explosives from standoff

  10.Grenade Technology

  Note 3: Assured Precision Weapons and Munitions PNT (Position Navigation and Timing) and NAVWAR Technology needs:

  1.Alternative sources of Position, Navigation, and/or Timing other than GPS for weapons and munitions (RF and non RF based)

  2.Assured Position Navigation and Timing (GPS and non GPS solutions) threat protection solutions

  3.PNT Software Defined Solutions for weapons and munitions

  4.Weapons and Munitions NAVWAR technologies supporting penetrating, disrupting, and disintegrating A2/AD environments and enabling situational awareness

  5.M&S tools facilitating NAVWAR analysis of weapons and munitions with possible integration into command and control constructs enabling optimal target and weapon/munition pairing in NAVWAR challenged environments

• 28. TECHNOLOGY EXPLOITATION

  The Government is interested in basic and applied research that involves the adaptation of advanced and innovative technology, processes and procedures from the private sector for military applications. Additionally, research that has transition potential of adapting existing military technology for unique warfighter needs are encouraged. Further, prototyping efforts, including state-of-the-art Additive Manufacturing, that assess manufacturing technologies and R&D systems at Government facilities are wanted. Finally, efforts that provide rapid response technologies to fulfill needs in critical, high priority missions that can maintain the quality and reliability of the systems are needed. This may also include coordinated efforts that evaluate operational environments and requirements in relation to a proposed technology.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, companies benefit from:

Government Validation & Technical Credibility
Being selected by DEVCOM Armaments Center signals that your technology aligns with Army modernization priorities—significantly strengthening credibility with primes, integrators, and investors.

Non-Dilutive Technology Maturation
Awards allow companies to advance high-risk, high-impact technologies with non-dilutive capital, increasing enterprise valuation and accelerating commercialization.

Access to Army Technical Stakeholders
Awardees collaborate with government engineers, program offices, and test facilities—creating opportunities for future transition paths, follow-on funding, and insertion into Army programs of record.

Increased Visibility & Notoriety
Participation in Army-funded R&D often enhances visibility with Congress, DoD stakeholders, and defense industry partners.

Strengthened Exit / Acquisition Potential
Demonstrating government-backed R&D progress increases the likelihood of strategic partnerships or acquisition by major defense primes.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• BAA Open Period: Open until Mar 17, 2026.

• White Papers: May be submitted any time during the open period.

• Evaluation: Approximately 3 weeks after submission.

• Proposal Requests: Only if the white paper is rated Promising, though any offeror may voluntarily submit a full proposal.

• Awards: Rolling, contingent on available funding; multi-month contracting timelines should be expected.

Because the BAA is continuously open, funding timing varies but generally follows white paper evaluation → proposal submission → negotiation → award.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Armaments Center, located at Picatinny Arsenal, under federal R&D authority including FAR 6.102(d)(2), 10 U.S.C. 2371/2358 (Other Transactions), and applicable DoD research statutes.

Who is eligible to apply?

All responsible sources may apply, including:

• Traditional and nontraditional defense contractors

• Small and large businesses

• Universities and research institutions

• Nonprofits

The BAA encourages participation from HBCUs and Minority Institutions.

SAM.gov registration is required prior to award. White papers and proposals must be submitted via email to the contracting POCs.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Highly competitive proposals will:

• Directly address one of the 28 detailed technology areas (e.g., advanced materials, energetics, AI/ML, fire control, autonomous munitions, logistics, digital engineering).

• Provide innovative, non-incremental research concepts

• Demonstrate feasibility, technical merit, and Army relevance

• Show strong organizational capability, facilities, and past performance

• Include clear pathways to future Army integration

Funded efforts typically target high-impact, dual-use, defense-relevant technologies aligned to Army modernization priorities such as long-range precision fires, soldier lethality, next-generation combat systems, and advanced energetics.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• Some OT awards may require cost share (e.g., 50/50 for research TIAs).

• Classified submissions require prior approval and special handling.

• Possession of a SECRET facility clearance is recommended for potential future phases (not needed to get started).

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

Typical preparation timelines:

• White Paper: 2–6 weeks depending on complexity.

• Full Proposal (if requested): 6–12+ weeks for technical, cost, and contractual documentation.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available to submit a white paper for a flat fee of $4,000.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most scout card projects requiring 10-12 hours of work.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Army Medical Operational Capabilities for 2040 BAA

Executive Summary:

The MED CDID Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) invites industry and other performers to propose innovative medical concepts and technologies that support tactical Army medical units in the 2040 Future Operational Environment. The program is open through December 31, 2030, using a multi-step process: submission of a Vulcan Scout Card, followed—if selected for further interest—by a white paper and then a full technical and cost proposal. Companies should plan their internal timelines to first shape a high-impact Scout Card aligned to MED CDID’s three imperatives: clearing the battlefield, maximizing return to duty, and overcoming contested logistics.

How much funding would I receive?

The MED CDID BAA does not specify individual award ceilings or a total program funding limit. Instead, offerors must propose a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) total cost (including any fee) that is consistent with the scope of work, period of performance, and any dollar ranges specified in the announcement or follow-on calls. Common costs range from $500K to $5M.

What could I use the funding for?

Proposals should address at least one problem associated with the following aspects of the future operational environment (FOE):

a. Enemy action (through fires, maneuver, electronic warfare, etc.) will inhibit evacuation and medical resupply operations. Slow, reduced, or ineffective evacuation or medical resupply delays the Soldier’s treatment at the proper medical treatment facility. When evacuation slows, the consumption of medical treatment items increases, thus compounding the resupply problem. The cumulative effects of inadequate evacuation and medical resupply will reduce the return to duty rate and increase the number of preventable deaths.

b. The proliferation of drones, sensors, and other advanced technologies has made the modern battlefield more transparent than ever before. This transparency, coupled with long range precision and massed fires, requires Army forces to be distributed across a wider area and to displace frequently. Enemy precision and massed fires will result in more frequent mass casualty incidents, which will likely occur in support areas rather than near the front lines. Future medical forces must therefore be highly mobile to conduct survivability moves, to support widely distributed units, and to respond quickly to the point of need with both medical personnel and supplies (Class VIII).

c. The future battlefield will likely have a broad range of man-made and naturally occurring chemical and biological threats. These threats may be varied and difficult to detect and prevent, making early warning systems crucial. Toxic industrial chemicals and toxic industrial materials in urban areas pose additional threats. Directed energy and other new weapons may cause novel wound patterns that require new training and treatments.

d. When operating in urban areas, challenges include moving through routes blocked by rubble, craters, and other obstacles. Medical units must plan to extract patients from collapsed buildings, interaction with civil medical infrastructure, and potentially large numbers of injured civilians and enemy prisoners.

e. An increasingly transparent and lethal battlefield with chem-bio threats and new weapons systems will create continuous physiological and psychological stressors. These stressors will lead to a decline in the cognitive, physical, and emotional aspects of Soldier performance, and thus a decline in unit combat effectiveness. Army medical units must expand capacity to build and restore individual resiliency, to reduce disease non-battle injury (DNBI) losses, and increase return to duty (RTD).

AREAS OF INTEREST

The Army is looking for solutions in the following categories. Please note that these categories are not comprehensive, but rather to provide context. Categories may be created or removed as time progresses:

• Clear the Battlefield

  Future wars will produce dramatically higher casualty numbers that will stress patient evacuation systems and restrict freedom of maneuver. Minimizing preventable death requires a multi-modal medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) system with advanced enroute care from the point of injury (POI) to the appropriate medical treatment facility at echelon. This MEDEVAC system must be mobile, survivable, and sustainable. It will leverage manned as well as autonomous and semi-autonomous platforms, integrate with casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) capabilities, and be synchronized to maximize efficiency.

  a. Autonomous / semi-autonomous platforms. Manned evacuation platforms areexpected to be insufficient for future combat operations with peer adversaries or in non-permissive environments. The Army's Robotics and Autonomous System (RAS) Strategy leverages systems to increase reach, capacity, and protection in high-risk areas. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) can be staged with support units to provide delivery of critical medical supplies when evacuation is not possible (i.e., prolonged care). A versatile unmanned system (UMS) with casualty evacuation capability would serve as a valuable tool for medical missions.

  b. CASEVAC. CASEVAC complements MEDEVAC by providing additional evacuation capacity when the number of casualties (workload) or mandated reaction time exceeds the capabilities or capacity of MEDEVAC assets. Casualty evacuation is often the first step in moving patients from the point of injury to the appropriate medical facility. Self-aid and buddy-aid are critical. Effective operational planning and a C2 system that integrates non-standard platforms maximizes the commander’s freedom of action and ensures efficient use of evacuation assets. Augmentation of medical personnel and equipment onboard dedicated CASEVAC platforms will increase survivability.

  c. Multimodal evacuation. Multimodal evacuation capabilities meet FOE challenges by using multiple modes of transportation (e.g. boats, buses, trains, etc.) to fulfill evacuation capability and capacity shortfalls. Future evacuation capabilities involve the seamless integration of land, air, and maritime (sea and river) transportation to ensure an efficient and effective evacuation system. Leveraging different modes of transportation optimizes mobility and flexibility, enhances response capabilities, and enables swift evacuation in a variety of operational environments.
  
  d. Prolonged Care. The FOE may not allow evacuation of patients at a time and place of our choosing, due to unavailability of assets or enemy action. Prolonged care is necessary to provide patient care for extended periods when evacuation is not available. Currently, the Prolonged Care Augmentation Detachment (PCAD) is designed to operate forward of definitive care capabilities in support of medical units, such as Battalion Aid Stations (BAS), medical companies, and Forward Resuscitation and Surgical Detachments (FRSD) to manage patients in a prolonged care setting. Further study is needed to determine if this capability can be significantly improved.

  e. Integrated and synchronized C2 of patient movement capabilities. C2 systems facilitate seamless communication and information sharing among healthcare providers, commanders, evacuation elements, and other stakeholders involved in patient movement. These systems enable real-time coordination, synchronization, and decision-making, ensuring efficient and effective allocation of resources for patient movement. An integrated C2 system incorporates AI-enabled real-time data analysis, predictive modeling, and adaptive learning to enable the following: mission requests management, treatment and evacuation capability tracking and two-way communication, intelligent tasking (dispatching), data management, and telemedicine and telehealth technologies to facilitate remote consultations, triage, and medical guidance during patient movement. These solutions enable evacuation mission and system management and enable healthcare providers to remotely assess and manage patients. They also allow optimization of medical personnel, equipment, supplies, and evacuation resources based on patient needs, urgency, and available capacity.

• Maximizing Return to Duty (RTD)

  Maximizing RTD allows for experienced Soldiers to return to the fight as quickly as possible after becoming wounded, injured, or ill. It includes prevention—minimizing disease and nonbattle injury (DNBI).

  a. Holistic resiliency. Commanders in conjunction with their medical staff will maximize preparedness through a holistic approach prior to and during deployment. This will serve to help minimize DNBI and battle injuries (BI). A holistic approach includes cognitive, physical, and emotional well-being, emphasizing proper nutrition, sleep, and social and environmental factors to navigate the rigors of combat operations. Advances in areas such as body-worn sensors, stress inoculation, and medical cognitive enhancements will further increase Soldiers’ capabilities in austere environments while decreasing the likelihood of becoming a casualty. Advanced biomedical engineering can create vaccines and individualized treatments to address emerging health threats before deployment to preserve the force.

  b. Theater Convalescence. In the theater of operations, convalescence capability is essential to maximizing RTD rates. Soldiers who are unlikely to RTD within the prescribed period (theater evacuation policy) will be evacuated out of theater with the first suitable transportation asset. Establishing in-theater convalescence serves to simultaneously decrease the logistical burden on theater transportation assets while decreasing the burden on replacement operations. Rehabilitation support encompasses cognitive and emotional healing as well as physical recovery (e.g., physical therapy with combat and operational stress control). Advanced prosthetics, exoskeletons, and robotic rehabilitation systems can assist Soldiers in regaining mobility and functionality after injury.

  c. Operational Public Health (OPH). OPH is a critical enabler for commanders to maintain maximum strength on the battlefield. OPH minimizes casualties through full spectrum surveillance, monitoring, and testing activities against environmental, biological, and chemical threats. Equipped and trained field sanitation and CBRN elements will establish tailored active and passive protection measures, resulting in more survivable formations. Army medical formations must integrate manned and unmanned air and surface systems to improve detection, diagnostics, and treatment. These formations must share information with all partners through a single, data-centric C2 system empowering both timely operational decisions and timely medical responses.

  d. Healthcare Training and Education. Medical education and training must align with combat demands. This comprehensive approach will encompass all medical specialties, using advanced training methodologies like virtual reality, haptic feedback systems, and AI-driven simulations to develop and maintain skills. These technologies will provide realistic and repeatable opportunities for personnel to practice high-stress and complex scenarios, like trauma triage or prolonged care.

  e. Advanced Diagnostics. In a combat environment, where split-second decisions can mean the difference between life and death, the benefits of advanced diagnostics are immeasurable. By incorporating cutting-edge technologies such as precision medicine, nanomedicine, robotics, telemedicine, and gene editing technology, Soldiers can experience optimized health and improved combat performance. Additionally, advanced diagnostics enable early detection of internal injuries, such as internal bleeding or organ damage, which may not be immediately evident. Swift identification of these hidden injuries allows medical personnel to intervene promptly and prevent further harm. Moreover, advanced diagnostics aid in identifying infectious diseases or exposure to hazardous agents (e.g., CBRN), thereby preventing outbreaks. Ultimately, the integration of advanced diagnostics in combat empowers medical teams to deliver timely and accurate care, leading to improved outcomes for wounded, injured, or ill Soldiers and enhanced operational efficiency.
  
  f. Advanced Therapeutic Technology (ATT). ATT will play a critical role in supporting commanders and Army Medicine. In austere and contested environments, ATT will enhance Army Medicine's ability to rapidly triage and assess injuries, leveraging portable diagnostic devices and advanced imaging systems to determine the severity of injuries and provide timely treatment. The ability of ATT to track Soldiers' exposure to hazardous conditions, such as chemical agents or extreme temperatures, will also be crucial in protecting personnel from emerging threats.

  g. Advanced Treatment Modalities (ATMs). The integration of ATMs will revolutionize the way combat commanders operate in future operational environments. With the advent of cutting-edge technologies such as robotic surgery and portable diagnostic equipment, commanders will be empowered to make informed decisions that prioritize the health and safety of their troops. ATMs such as bioengineered skin substitutes and negative pressure wound therapy will be particularly critical in managing complex battlefield injuries, promoting faster wound healing, reducing infection risk, and enhancing long-term recovery. The combination of these advanced medical capabilities and technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics, will enable rapid and effective treatment of wounded personnel, reduce the risk of mortality and morbidity, and facilitate their swift return to duty.

• Overcoming Contested Logistics

  Future supply lines will likely be disrupted, congested, and under constant threat. Predicted high casualty rates in future warfare requires Army medical forces to have predictable and reliable delivery of Class VIII at the point of need (PON). This will enable clearing the battlefield and maximizing RTD while facilitating expanded maneuver and survivable formations. In the FOE, the threat will likely target sustainment nodes from the homeland (industrial base) to the operational area, cutting off access to sustainment capabilities and resources. Compounding this problem is the demand to support widely distributed friendly forces.

  a. Advanced Manufacturing. Advanced manufacturing can revolutionize logistics by enabling the production of essential supplies at or near the PON. This includes the production of Class VIII A/B medical supplies through synthetic biology and biomedical manufacturing.

  b. Predictive medical logistics (MEDLOG). This capability uses advanced analysis to predict where and when medical supplies will be needed. It allows for the optimization of Class VIII supplies, which include medical materiel and equipment, across all echelons. By analyzing expected casualty rates and injury mechanisms, predictive MEDLOG enables planning and allocation of resources. Integration with partners and allies will additionally enhance this capability by using standardized equipment, supplies, and data-sharing protocols, ensuring that medical logistics systems work seamlessly across different military forces. At higher echelons, persistent assessment of the supply chain (from rare earth metals and active pharmaceutical ingredients to industrial-based capacity) must be conducted through the lens of risk to mission and risk to force.

  c. Multimodal resupply. Multimodal resupply combines air, land, and maritime transportation with manned and unmanned systems to enhance resupply capabilities and reduce reliance on a single mode of transport. Air transport provides speed and agility for time-sensitive items, while land transport offers flexibility in various terrains. Maritime transport (both sea and river, surface and subsurface) handles larger quantities over longer distances. Manned systems provide adaptability, while unmanned and autonomous systems offer speed, precision, and reduced risk. This multimodal approach optimizes logistics operations, ensures timely supply delivery, and overcomes challenges in contested environments.

  d. Distributed supply nodes. These nodes are strategically positioned throughout the operational area to ensure effective resupply. This approach offers several advantages, including reduced vulnerability to disruptions, resupply redundancy, and enhanced operational coordination. By having multiple supply nodes, military forces can mitigate disruptions in one area by relying on alternative nodes (to include those of partners and allies). Supplies can be sourced from the nearest available node, reducing transportation time and costs, and ensuring critical supplies reach the PON in a timely manner. Additionally, strategically positioned supply nodes enable better coordination and synchronization of logistics activities, optimizing resource distribution, and enhancing overall operational effectiveness while reducing strain on logistics capabilities. Robots and autonomous platforms specifically designed to operate in these supply nodes allow for additional flexibility.

  e. Autonomous and semi-autonomous resupply systems. Autonomous and semi- autonomous resupply systems enhance logistics capabilities by reducing reliance on human intervention in contested logistics. These systems leverage advanced technologies to automate and streamline the resupply process, resulting in increased efficiency and flexibility while reducing risk. In addition, these systems can serve to enhance situational awareness by having their sensors gather data from their surroundings.

  f. Tele-maintenance and remote diagnostics. These capabilities will enable medical logisticians to provide guidance and consultation from afar, minimizing the need for physical transportation of personnel and materiel. Advanced diagnostic tools and predictive maintenance algorithms can identify potential equipment failures before they occur, ensuring the highest levels of readiness.

• Cross-cutting Components

  There are functions that support two or more of the three medical imperatives outlined above.

  a. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. By using AI and ML to analyze vast amounts of data, patterns can be detected, outcomes can be more accurately predicted, and sound recommendations can be quickly developed for commanders. This allows medical personnel at all echelons and across all medical functions to act more quickly and decisively, ultimately reducing preventable deaths.

  b. Human-machine teaming. This teaming involves leveraging the unique strengths of both humans and machines to achieve operational goals. Machines, equipped with AI and machine learning, can process, and analyze vast amounts of data at speeds far beyond human capabilities. This allows for real-time analytics of supply chain needs and predictive modeling for medical supply, evacuation, and treatment. The integration of human capabilities with advanced technological systems represents a transformative shift towards more efficient, responsive, and adaptive medical support on the battlefield.

  c. Scalable, highly mobile multifunctional organizations. The FOE demands that medical units at all echelons be as mobile as the maneuver units they support to keep up with the rapid pace of military operations and to better ensure survivability. Medical organizations that are scalable and multifunctional will allow maneuver commanders increased flexibility in rapidly changing situations. In addition, medical units must decrease their signature (physical, electronic, etc.) to avoid enemy detection.

  d. Interoperability with the Combined Joint Force. Interoperability with partners and allies is crucial for achieving success. It ensures that different medical forces can work together seamlessly, share information, and support each other's operations. This capability enhances mission success by leveraging the strengths and resources of multiple Services and nations, fostering mutual trust and cooperation. Moreover, interoperability helps in responding swiftly to global crises, maintaining regional stability, and deterring potential threats through a unified front. Ultimately, it strengthens collective defense and augments the Army's medical capabilities.

  e. Health Engagement. Health engagement plays a significant role in winning in competition and being prepared for crisis and conflict. Through engagement with international health organizations, foreign militaries, and local healthcare systems, Army medical forces can foster collaboration, build trust, and promote a shared understanding of health security threats and responses. This, in turn, enhances interoperability with partners and allies, allowing for more effective coordination and cooperation in response to health crises and other operational challenges. Health engagement also allows for enhancing situational awareness.

  f. Reach back. Reach back is an essential component for enhancing battlefield capability, capacity, and operational readiness. This approach will use advanced telepresence and telemedicine technologies, along with integrated data systems, to conserve a commander's fighting strength. Reach back improves real-time diagnostics and remote treatment, allowing medical personnel real-time remote access to specialized care. Furthermore, in an environment characterized by contested logistics, reach back can provide a lifeline, using virtual platforms to maintain continuity of care and resource allocation.

  g. Operate in a CBRN environment. The best way to deter enemy CBRN use is to demonstrate that Army forces can effectively operate in a CBRN environment. The ability to rapidly assess threats, evacuate and treat patients, and resupply in contaminated areas is crucial to minimize preventable death and maximize RTD. Additionally, continued development of advanced deployable sensors that can observe current and emerging CBRN threats can help decrease those threats.

  h. Medical Modeling and Simulations. Incorporating medical modeling and simulation in both training and in operational settings is crucial. By using advanced modeling techniques, medical professionals can simulate diverse medical scenarios, thereby optimizing treatment plans, forecast the spread of diseases, and evaluate casualties in complex operational environments. These simulations facilitate the development medical resource allocation plans, identifying potential bottlenecks in the treatment and evacuation process, and enhance preparedness in large-scale conflicts. Furthermore, modeling and simulation allows testing of various prevention and intervention strategies, aiding in the identification of the most efficient approaches to minimize casualties and improve overall outcomes.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, MED CDID funding offers significant strategic advantages for companies operating in defense, medical technology, logistics, AI/ML, and dual-use innovation:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Being selected by the U.S. Army Medical Capability Development Integration Directorate demonstrates strong technical merit and alignment with Army 2040 operational needs. This validation can accelerate engagement with primes, program offices, integrators, and investors who prioritize government-vetted technologies.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
Although the BAA does not explicitly promise publicity, MED CDID-aligned innovations often surface in Army medical modernization discussions, technical exchanges, and defense-sector forums—raising your company’s profile across DoD medical, logistics, and capability development communities.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain direct interaction with MED CDID, Army Futures Command stakeholders, and operational medical units. These touchpoints can open pathways to experimentation events, requirements discussions, field evaluations, and future contracting opportunities with Army, Joint, and SOF medical acquisition organizations.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive DoD funding that advances medical, logistics, or autonomy technologies—combined with Army validation—typically increases a company’s valuation and attractiveness to acquirers in defense, biotech, medtech, autonomy, and advanced manufacturing. Government-backed maturity substantially strengthens both commercial and dual-use exit potential.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Open period: The announcement is open from its posting date through December 31, 2030, as an open-ended BAA.

• Submission cadence: Vulcan Scout Cards may be submitted at any time during the open period, subject to the process in the BAA. The government may also issue separate, focused calls for follow-on white papers at any time while the BAA is active.

• Multi-step process:

  1. Vulcan Scout Card submission.

  2. If of interest, MED CDID may request a white paper and/or

  3. A formal technical and cost proposal.

The BAA does not specify review cycle timing or when funds would be awarded after a proposal is submitted. Actual award timing will depend on when MED CDID issues a request for proposal, internal evaluations, and contracting timelines.

Where does this funding come from?

This opportunity is issued by the U.S. Army Medical Capability Development Integration Directorate (MED CDID), which is responsible for enabling the Army Health System and developing future medical concepts and requirements for the Army and Joint Force

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Based on the BAA’s emphasis, competitive projects are likely to:

• Directly address one or more of the three MED CDID imperatives:

  • Clearing the battlefield (evacuation, prolonged care, integrated patient-movement C2).

  • Maximizing return to duty (resiliency, OPH, advanced diagnostics and treatment, training).

  • Overcoming contested logistics (advanced manufacturing, predictive MEDLOG, multimodal resupply).

• Provide innovative, future-oriented solutions for the 2040 operational environment, not just incremental improvements to current practice.

• Show clear relevance to the described FOE challenges (distributed forces, mass casualties, CBRN threats, urban operations, contested logistics).

• Leverage cross-cutting enablers such as AI/ML, human-machine teaming, interoperability with joint and allied forces, and medical modeling and simulation to materially improve outcomes (reduced preventable deaths, higher RTD rates, more resilient logistics).

In short, teams that tightly map their concept to these problem statements and demonstrate operational impact for Corps-and-below medical units are best aligned with the BAA.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Tactical level focus: The BAA is focused on tactical-level (Army Corps and below) medical units, not broader health systems in isolation.

• Targeted white papers: White papers should address only the specific portion of the BAA the offeror intends to accomplish. Submitting a single white paper that tries to cover the entire scope of the BAA is “most likely” to be rejected.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive scout card under this BAA will likely take 20–30 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available to submit a scout card for a flat fee of $2,500.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most scout card projects requiring 10-12 hours of work.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on Vulcan

DLA Military Unique Sustainment Technology III (MUST-III) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

The Defense Logistics Agency’s MUST-III BAA provides up to $50M over five years for R&D that improves the military’s clothing and equipment manufacturing ecosystem. Companies may apply during the initial 45-day window (through Jan 16, 2026) for IDIQ consideration, or later through rolling White Paper submissions once the BAA reopens.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings, but it does specify:

• Total available program funding: up to $50M over 5 years.

• Awards are issued as cost-type contracts, which commonly support multi-hundred-thousand- to multi-million-dollar R&D projects.

• Each Short-Term Project (STP) is typically 3–24 months.

Historically, DLA ManTech STPs are substantial technical efforts—often sized to fully execute a discrete R&D solution (e.g., digital thread capability, manufacturing prototype, supply chain modeling tool).

What could I use the funding for?

Projects must align with one of the three Technical Areas of Interest:

• Digital as an authoritative source

  Establishing a single, trusted digital version of clothing and individual equipment specifications, manufacturing data, and sourcing details to reduce errors, increase speed, and enable automation throughout the supply chain.

  o This includes transitioning from traditional technical documents to digital data as the primary source of truth, ensuring all design, sourcing, and production information is timely, accurate consistent, accessible, and secure.

  o Emphasis should be placed on integrating model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and digital thread technologies. This transformation should rely on IT architectures that support interoperability, cybersecurity, and protection of intellectual property.

  o Advanced technologies such as augmented reality, AI, and machine learning could be utilized to bridge business and technical workflows, enhancing accuracy and operational efficiency.

  o Establishing secure, “time of need” information sharing capability e.g. Application Program Interfaces to enable distribution of technical data over the product lifecycle.

• Supply chain resilience in clothing and individual equipment

  Developing and demonstrating adaptive manufacturing capabilities and buffer strategies—like material stockpiles or alternate sourcing—that help the industry continue operating during surge requirements, large-scale conflicts, disasters, or disruptions.

  o Research in this area could focus on mapping supply chains, identifying critical bottlenecks, or developing models to simulate and respond to various disruptions. Tools like digital twin simulations of the supply chain and predictive analytics could be utilized to proactively address labor shortages, material delays, and capacity issues.

  o Researchers might also examine how to incorporate surge readiness, excess capacity strategies, and prepositioned material stockpiles to ensure stability in times of crisis.

  o Supplier categorization using digital platforms could support diversified sourcing and highlight alternative production pathways when traditional channels are compromised.

  o Develop capabilities to manufacture for low-volume or “made to measure” items, cost effectively with the very short lead-time needed to meet mission requirements (e.g. training goals).

• Innovation in clothing and individual equipment

  Encouraging research and development in novel materials, garment designs, and production methods (e.g. 3D knitting, advanced wearables, automated sewing) to enhance the performance, comfort, and scalability of military clothing and individual equipment.

  o Efforts should prioritize interfacing and coordinating with the Military Services on the development of cutting-edge textile technologies, next-generation uniform systems. This includes advanced manufacturing techniques. containerized and point-of-need manufacturing capabilities that allow rapid setup and deployment in remote or austere environments.

  o Research to encourage exploration into wearable technologies, self-healing fabrics, and automated production techniques such as 3D knitting and robotics. Digital representations of product lifecycles and materials performance, paired with a workforce trained in AI and digital tools, will ensure that new capabilities are both scalable and resilient.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, companies gain several strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection under DLA’s Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) program is a strong technical endorsement. This validation can accelerate partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors who trust government-vetted innovation.

Visibility & Industry Notoriety
Awardees participate in DLA working groups and may be highlighted in federal program materials—raising national profile within the defense textile and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

Access to DLA Experts & Ecosystem Collaboration
IDIQ awardees join a 5-year Working Group, providing direct collaboration with DLA program managers, CIE stakeholders, and other innovators—unlocking future contracting and transition opportunities.

Stronger Long-Term Valuation & Exit Potential
Advancing technology under nondilutive federal funding de-risks the product roadmap and strengthens valuation in future equity rounds or acquisition discussions—especially with defense, apparel manufacturing, or automation companies.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Initial Deadline:

• Full technical & cost proposals due January 16, 2026 (45 days after Dec 2, 2025 posting).

• These proposals are for IDIQ contract consideration.

After Initial Period:

• The BAA temporarily closes for evaluation.

• It then reopens for rolling White Paper submissions for the remainder of the 5-year period.

Award Timing:

• After evaluation, DLA notifies offerors of selection.

• Task orders (STPs) may or may not be immediately issued to IDIQ holders.

• Additional STPs may be awarded after White Papers → requested proposals → evaluation cycle.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) under the Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Program.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any responsible U.S. source capable of meeting government requirements, including:

• Large businesses

• Small businesses (including WOSB, HUBZone, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB)

• Nonprofits

• Universities / Minority Institutions

• HBCUs

There is no set-aside.
Must meet minimum standards in: financial resources, accounting system adequacy, technical capabilities, past performance, and compliance with FAR Part 9.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants typically include companies with:

• Expertise in digital engineering, textile manufacturing, AI/ML, automation, or supply chain analytics.

• Demonstrated DoD or CIE manufacturing experience (digital data, prototyping, supply chain modeling).

• Capabilities aligned tightly to Technical Areas of Interest.

• Strong past performance and ability to transition solutions into the production environment.

Examples of strong project types:

• Digital twin implementation for apparel manufacturing

• Secure digital technical data environment (authoritative source of truth)

• Surge production capability modeling

• Automated sewing or 3D knitting demonstrations

• Wearable sensor textiles

• AI-enabled supply chain forecasting for CIE items

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key requirements include:

• Cybersecurity compliance (DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171, CMMC).

• No compensation for proposing STPs (including White Papers).

• Subcontracting plans required for large businesses on proposals > $750,000.

• Projects must be executed within U.S. regulations for export controls, IP, and data rights.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a full proposal under this opportunity will likely take 150-200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

ARPA-H BioStabilization Systems (BoSS)

Executive Summary:

The ARPA-H BioStabilization Systems (BoSS) program provides multi-year support for teams developing ambient-temperature cell stabilization and scalable bioprocessing systems. Performer Solution Summaries are due February 19, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

ARPA-H anticipates multiple OT awards, with the expectation that Performer teams will be funded through multi-phase development (up to 48 months). While specific award ceilings aren't stated, ARPA-H OT programs typically support multi-million-dollar development efforts and note that several teams may be funded initially with down-selects in later phases.

What could I use the funding for?

The BioStabilization Systems (BoSS) program aims to transform how live cell-based therapies are stabilized, manufactured, and distributed. At its core, BoSS addresses a foundational bottleneck in the delivery of advanced cell and gene therapies (CGTs): the critical dependence on ultra-cold conditions (-80 to -196˚C) for storage and transport. BoSS will yield a bioprocessing system that enables scalable production of thermally stable cells, paving the way for a new era of efficient and resilient manufacturing and distribution of biologics without any need for cold storage. BoSS-developed technologies will also accelerate many other avenues in biotechnology that directly impact healthcare, including bio-surveillance, regenerative medicine, large-scale genetic testing, blood product supply, and wound repair, in addition to improving access to a wide range of existing biotherapeutics.

This ISO is intended to solicit:

1) Performer teams that can pioneer breakthrough cell stabilization technologies and integrate these technologies into a commercially viable system for producing cell therapy products at scale. Strategic partnerships are encouraged to best position technologies for commercialization success, such as assembling multidisciplinary teams that may include experts from academic, industry, regulatory, commercialization, and non-traditional backgrounds.

2) An Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) partner to reliably provide well-characterized, clinically relevant, government-selected cells to Technical Area Performers. This partner will also assess cell viability and system performance at critical junctures throughout the program.

• Background

  This year approximately 150 million Americans will use at least one thermally unstable biologic, such as a monoclonal antibody, vaccine, or cell therapy. The instability of these medicines necessitates a reliance on cold chain, which jeopardizes product effectiveness, escalates costs, and limits access due to complex, temperature-dependent manufacturing and distribution schemes. Furthermore, costly ultra-cold cryopreservation is the standard approach to extending shelf-life stability for life saving biologics such as CGTs. However, demand for CGTs continues to surge, powered by their transformative impact on healthcare and reflected in rapid market expansion. Globally, there are now >3000 CGTs in the development pipeline, ranging from pre-clinical through pre-registration phases. Innovative solutions that relieve cold chain requirements while preserving shelf-life stability are crucial to meeting this rising demand, as FDA approval and widespread patient access to CGTs rely on maintaining product quality throughout storage and distribution.

  BoSS aims to develop innovative technologies that preserve cells at ambient temperatures, a breakthrough approach we will subsequently refer to as biostabilization. Achieving biostabilization remains a two-fold challenge that has yet to be overcome. The first challenge requires cellular interventions to preserve the integrity and function of vital elements prior to undergoing stabilization, enabling cells to withstand physical changes that would otherwise cause irreversible damage. This could include delivering protectants into cells and/or altering cells in other ways to improve processing and storage resilience. To maintain the clinical utility of cell products, cellular interventions to prepare and deploy biostabilization must be both biocompatible and reversible. The second challenge involves implementing aseptic, cell-friendly handling instrumentation to deploy stabilization techniques across various production scales.
  
  One approach to address the first challenge is to adopt nature’s strategies to accomplish biostabilization. For example, ‘anhydrobiotes’ can tolerate extreme loss of water and persist in a dehydrated state for years (e.g., tardigrades, rotifers, brine shrimp), quickly regaining full function after rehydration. Molecular contributors to this resilience have been elucidated such as amorphous trehalose glass and special classes of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Recent studies have revealed cell structure re-arrangements and stress-induced formation of molecular condensates that may be essential for surviving the stresses of dry processing. Other discoveries from the genomic to the organismal scale form the natural basis of desiccation tolerance and may be adapted or improved upon for biostabilization. Solutions inspired by chemistry and materials science advances are also encouraged along with approaches that employ biocompatible polymers, scaffolds, multi-organic frameworks, or cell encapsulation to protect and stabilize cells.

  Addressing the second challenge requires development of new processing approaches and potentially new instrumentation that can yield products suitable for ambient storage. Current gold standard methods for batch processing like lyophilization (freeze-drying) are energy-intensive, slow, and challenging to apply to complex biologics. While appropriate for proteins, antibodies, and even some vaccines, lyophilization is a risky and unproven approach for high-value cell products that are widely used in the biopharma industry as starting materials, manufacturing intermediates, host cells, and cell-based therapies. Nascent technologies like microwave-assisted vacuum foam-drying, thin film freeze-drying, and polymerization gelation exhibit potential for processing complex biologics but remain at a low manufacturing readiness level (MRL), i.e., early-stage development and requires significant development to establish full-scale production. Established technologies with high MRL, such as spray-drying, commonly used for food production, offer the advantage of continuous processing and may have potential for adaptation to biologics.
  

  Successful completion of BoSS will yield a bioprocessing system designed as a platform technology for stabilizing cell biologics capable of easy integration into biomanufacturing pipelines. The bioprocessing system will enable scalable production and distribution of thermally stable cells benefiting the biopharmaceutical ecosystem that uses cells as starting materials, manufacturing intermediates, and CGTs. Breakthroughs from BoSS are expected to yield biostabilization innovations including intracellular and extracellular protectants and stabilizers, enabling bioprocessing technologies, and re-animation products. Together, BoSS bioprocessing system and biostabilization technologies will be commercially viable solutions that will establish a new paradigm for biomanufacturing designed to reduce costs and ensure that biological medicines are accessible to patients, including those living in the most remote and resource-limited communities.

• Technical Areas

  BoSS envisions that successful solutions will converge from extremophile biology, biomaterials science, biomanufacturing, pharmaceutical formulation, process engineering, and device development to unlock new bioprocessing and biostabilization solutions, bridging historical silos in biostasis science and advancing biological medicines. Proposals are required to address solutions to both technical areas:
  
  Technical Area 1 (TA1): BioPrep

  Approaches to BioPrep include preparing, protecting, and other methods of intervention to allow cells to endure and recover from biostabilization at room temperature. BioPrep solutions should be reversible interventions that support the suspension of biological activity while ensuring cellular health and integrity upon reanimation. BioPrep solutions may also include the development of re-animation techniques and solutions that rapidly restore biological activities after biostabilization.
  
  Technical Area 2 (TA2): Bioprocessing

  Bioprocessing technologies (e.g., instruments, devices) should enable the deployment of biostabilization concepts at scale. Activities may include the scale-up of an early MRL, cell-friendly processing technology, or the adaptation of scaled systems that can be re-designed to safely and gently handle cells. The proposed solution should mitigate stress on cells while achieving biostabilization with preserved quality and function for extended durations at ambient temperatures.
  
  Proposers must submit proposals to both TAs. A conforming proposal will account for all program requirements outlined in this ISO, both TA-specific and overall program milestones and metrics.

• Program Overview

  Technology commercialization is a critical part of achieving the ARPA-H mission to improve health outcomes for all Americans. To support this goal, progress will be measured by strategic metrics and milestones that must be met to advance through subsequent phases. Technologies will advance across three integrated phases designed to drive both technical advancement and commercial translation:

  •

  Phase 1 focuses on establishing the scientific feasibility of ambient biostabilization. This proof-of-concept stage includes developing innovative cell preparation approaches with enabling instrumentation that, together, are capable of inducing biostabilization as well as re-animation methods to restore function after biostabilization.

  •

  Phase 2 emphasizes integrated capability demonstrations, converging biological and manufacturing innovations into a cohesive bioprocessing system that can produce stabilized cells under simulated commercial conditions.

  •

  Phase 3 advances to scaled solution development and industry transition, preparing the bioprocessing system for market entry through GMP-compliant production, strategic industry partnerships, and validation in real-world use cases.

  Performer teams must meet increasingly stringent technological capability requirements and stabilized cell quality metrics during each phase to demonstrate progress on biostabilization technology development. Performers will choose cells used for end of phase demonstrations from a list of government-selected cell types, which will be identified at the start of the performance period. Sub-phase milestones may be demonstrated on cell types chosen by the Performer, with consideration to the restrictions identified in Table 1. In later stages, end of phase demonstrations will be permitted on cells that are aligned with Phase 3 transition partners. Ideal transitional partners for Performers are organizations equipped with established distribution networks to seamlessly integrate the developed bioprocessing system into their existing biomanufacturing pipelines for cell biologics, accelerating the path from innovation to implementation.

  At the end of the program, biostabilization technologies will demonstrate capability, scalability, and applicability of commercially viable platform technologies that enable room temperature storage and distribution of stabilized cells agnostic of cell type, supporting widespread access to biologic medicines. The ideal bioprocessing system will integrate seamlessly with biomanufacturing and fill-finish systems. Ultimately, partnerships will culminate into early adoption of a new commercially viable bioprocessing system capable of scalable production of stabilized cell products that meet Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and GMP standards with a path paved for commercialization to support broad industry adoption.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the primary funding, BoSS awardees gain several indirect strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection by ARPA-H establishes strong scientific legitimacy and positions your technology as a potential national-level biomanufacturing platform.

Enhanced Visibility & Notoriety
Awardees are featured through ARPA-H communications, Proposers’ Day events, and industry engagement, increasing recognition among biotech investors, health systems, and biopharma manufacturers.

Access to a National Innovation Network
BoSS includes structured engagement with an Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V) partner, FDA interactions, and optional commercialization support—creating opportunities for partnerships, pilot studies, and eventual technology adoption.

Stronger Exit, Growth, and Acquisition Potential
Nondilutive development of platform technologies can significantly improve valuation, especially for companies working in CGT manufacturing, biosurveillance platforms, or enabling bioprocessing technologies. Government validation reduces perceived technical risk for acquirers and later-stage investors.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Key dates:

• Proposers’ Day: January 29, 2026

• Performer Solution Summary: February 19, 2026

• Performer Pitch: March 26, 2026

• IV&V Solution Summary: April 17, 2026

• IV&V Pitch: May 15, 2026

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is issued through the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), under the Scalable Solutions Office, using Other Transaction (OT) authority for high-risk, high-impact biomedical innovation.

Who is eligible to apply?

Universities, Nonprofits, Small and large commercial businesses, Non-U.S. entities (with restrictions; must not be from foreign entities of concern), Must conduct work in the U.S., FFRDCs and U.S. Government entities cannot participate as Performers.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

See full solicitation for details. Strong candidates include companies with capabilities in:

• Cell & gene therapy engineering

• Bioprocessing & biomanufacturing instrumentation

• Biomaterials, polymers, encapsulation, or intracellular protectants

• Cell preservation technologies (cryopreservation alternatives, desiccation biology)

• Microfluidics, closed-system processing, or continuous manufacturing

• Regulatory-ready biologics or device development expertise

• Advanced analytical platforms (cell viability, potency, functional assays)

Winning projects will propose integrated TA1 + TA2 solutions capable of achieving:

• Room-temperature stability (14 days → 3 months)

• Reanimation <1 hour by Phase 3

• High viability, function, and potency metrics across multiple cell types

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• No genetic manipulation of cells

• No dangerous gain-of-function research (per EO 14292)

• No demonstrations on RBCs or microbial species

• No slow (>4 hr prep or >1 day processing) methods

• No methods that cannot scale or meet GMP requirements

• No traditional lyophilization

• Teams must maintain SAM.gov registration for Step 2

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a solution summary under this opportunity will likely take 50-70 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

DARPA Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) Office-Wide BAA

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) is offering funding for revolutionary research across microelectronics, photonic circuits, quantum systems, biological/organic circuits, advanced manufacturing ecosystems, and dual-use microsystems. Multiple awards are anticipated, with no predefined funding limits. Abstracts are accepted until January 15, 2026, and proposals until March 2, 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding amount is flexible. DARPA anticipates multiple awards, and efforts may span basic research (6.1), applied research (6.2), or advanced technology development (6.3). Proposers can also elect an Accelerated Award Option for awards under $2 million with 30-day award timelines.

What could I use the funding for?

Research areas of current interest to MTO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

• Quantum circuits

  1. Interconnect technologies for transferring quantum states between qubit platforms

  2. Generalizable improvements for processing chain for all types of quantum sensors

  3. High density low loss mixed signal transfer between room and quantum temperatures

• Biological circuits

  1. High throughput molecular readers for full spectrum sequencing

  2. 3-dimensional bio-templated self-assembly of microsystems

  3. Highly-parallel DNA writing platforms for long DNA writes for genome-scale complexity with low error

• Photonic circuits

  1. Applications for purely photonic circuits not realizable in electronic circuits

  2. Chip scale photonics for ultralow noise microwave sources

  3. Tunable chip scale ultrafast (<10 ps) lasers

  4. Fiber-inspired ultralow loss integrated photonics

• Manufacturing Ecosystem

  1. Litho- and etch-free direct nanoscale semiconductor manufacturing

  2. Low-loss high permeability/permittivity materials

  3. High density cryogenic-to-room-temperature interconnects

  4. Atomically precise, multi-chemistry molecular manufacturing technologies

  5. Energy reclamation from low-grade waste heat

  6. Reconfigurable multiscale manufacturing for onshore manufacturing

• Dual Use by Design

  1. All-weather long distance high bandwidth communications

  2. Commercially relevant tool development challenge problems

  3. Conformal and malleable batteries

  4. Design and assembly of complex microsystems in supply-chain-free environments

  5. Reconfigurable additive manufacturing for multiple classes of materials

  6. Context aware imaging

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, awardees gain significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
DARPA selection signals elite technical quality and national-security relevance — often accelerating partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility
Awards frequently lead to increased visibility through DARPA communications, publications, and industry attention.

Ecosystem Access & Collaboration
Awardees join a national innovation community spanning quantum, photonics, microelectronics, and advanced materials — opening doors to long-term collaborations and follow-on opportunities.

Stronger Exit & Acquisition Potential
Non-dilutive support enables deep tech maturation without equity loss. Companies validated by DARPA historically see improved valuation, stronger commercial traction, and increased acquisition interest.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Abstract Deadline: January 15, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

Proposal Deadline: March 2, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

DARPA reviews proposals on a rolling basis.

If you select the Accelerated Award Option (<$2M projects), DARPA may issue an award within 30 days of selection notification.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Microsystems Technology Office (STO).

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Research must be revolutionary, not incremental.

• CMMC Level 2 is required for procurement contracts beginning Nov 10, 2025.

• Foreign influence and security review applies to fundamental research teams.

• Classified submissions require coordination with DARPA security.

• Export control and CUI restrictions apply.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $5,000 for the Abstract Submission.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

DIU Project Janus – Advanced Nuclear Microreactor Power Plant Prototyping

Executive Summary:

Project Janus is soliciting commercial solutions to design, prototype, and deploy advanced nuclear Microreactor Power Plants (MPPs) that can provide continuous, resilient power across Army installations. Awarded vendors will prototype both a First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and a Second-of-a-Kind (SOAK) MPP, leading to potential follow-on production and long-term power purchase agreements. Solution Briefs are due December 15, 2025, so companies should begin preparing ASAP.

How much funding would I receive?

DIU does not publish fixed award amounts, but nuclear prototyping OTAs typically fall within the multi-million to tens-of-millions range, depending on complexity and vendor contributions.

Importantly, DIU OTAs can lead directly to large follow-on production contracts or long-term electricity PPAs without further competition, enabling far greater lifetime contract value.

What could I use the funding for?

Problem Statement

Ensuring consistent, resilient energy across military installations and operational theaters has become an increasingly complex challenge for the U.S. military. Aging infrastructure, dependence on vulnerable civilian power grids, complex liquid fuel logistics, and rising energy demands from advanced technologies all threaten mission assurance. Frequent electricity outages, grid disruptions, and limited backup capacity jeopardize critical systems responsible for command, control, communications, and logistics. This directly undermines readiness, training, and operational effectiveness. These vulnerabilities underscore the urgent need for secure, scalable, and independent energy solutions that ensure continuous power for the warfighter to operate anytime, anywhere, regardless of external grid instability or supply chain disruptions.

The U.S. Army, alongside the Defense Innovation Unit, seeks to prototype Microreactor Power Plant(s) (MPPs) capable of developing a suite of advanced nuclear power plant energy solutions to meet the needs of the U.S. Department of War (DoW). These MPPs will leverage recent advances in the nuclear industry to provide continuous and reliable power in all DoW scenarios and will be demonstrated on a military installation within the United States by 2030.

Background

On 23 May 2025, four executive orders (EOs) were issued that aimed at modernizing America’s nuclear energy posture, with direct implications for the Army and the broader DoW. In particular, EO 14299 Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security, states that “it is the policy of the United States to ensure the rapid development, deployment, and use of advanced nuclear technologies to support national security objectives, such as the protection and operation of critical infrastructure, critical defense facilities, and other mission capability resources.” These orders represent a strategic shift towards immediately and impactfully leveraging advanced nuclear technologies. Meeting the objectives of EO14299 requires a focus on both installation and operational energy goals through a coordinated prototype program that leverages MPP technologies to address the Department of War’s energy needs. 

Project Approach

The broader Department of the Army’s Janus program objective is to develop a suite of prototype solutions for MPPs that can supply power for both installations and non-permanent operations. The Janus project approach under the DIU CSO will use an iterative prototype development process to provide a clear path to transition of the successful commercially demonstrated technology solutions. “Suite” refers to the DoW’s intent to select multiple reactor designs for the OTA Agreement, each to be paired with an Army installation by the Army after contract award. This will involve prototyping a First of a Kind (FOAK) MPP under the Army’s regulatory authority, followed shortly after by a Second of a Kind (SOAK) MPP, also using the Army’s regulatory authority. The Department is seeking fission-based solution sets for installation and defense purposes. 

Vendors will be paired with Army installations after the OTA contract award. Vendors will develop their FOAK prototype for demonstration on that installation and commence design of the SOAK prototype near the end of FOAK design. The SOAK prototype is expected to build on lessons learned from the FOAK and include design changes from the FOAK prototype, through iterative prototyping. 

Vendor solutions submitted under the AOI are highly encouraged to use the FOAK and SOAK approach in their proposals, and discuss the path from SOAK to Nth-of-a-kind production. Solutions may utilize the operating life of both the FOAK and SOAK MPPs in series to reach the 30-year lifetime power generation, assuming continuity of power across the 30-year period. 

The Army will be announcing the selection of the initial group of installations for the Janus project MPP prototypes at a later date. Vendors are prohibited from contacting or responding to queries from the installations regarding any aspect of CSO HQ084520SC001 or the Janus project. Vendors who do not comply with the prohibition may be removed from participation in the Janus Project. 

Project Objectives

The Department is seeking solution briefs for the full lifecycle of MPPs that would notionally start operations at an Army installation located in the United States before the end of calendar year 2030. Solution briefs should include all stages of an MPP’s lifecycle: design, testing, regulation, construction, operations, deconstruction, and returning the site to an unrestricted release status.

The objectives of the prototype include: 

• Provide mission assurance through energy resilience for a range of defense applications. 

• Assemble and operate prototype MPPs on military installations within the United States to demonstrate the capability of the MPP designs to provide safe, secure, reliable, and environmentally compliant electricity and thermal energy (if needed) in support of readiness goals for mission critical assets.

• Engage with the government and privatized distribution providers, transmission providers, and commodity providers currently serving U.S. Military installations to facilitate seamless and resilient energy regardless of commercial grid conditions.

Final solutions will follow a process under the U.S. Army Regulatory Authority for the entire lifecycle. The U.S. Army’s regulatory authority is derived from section 91b of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. § 2121(b)), as implemented pursuant to the Presidential Directive of 23 September 1961. Vendors will follow the Army regulatory process as documented in AR 50-7 (2016), although additional guidance will be provided during Phase 2 and throughout the FOAK design. AR 50-7 can be found at: https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r50-7_Web_FINAL.pdf. 

Awarded vendors will be given opportunities to provide feedback on gaps in Army regulatory processes as additional regulatory guidance is provided. Additional regulatory requirements, such as transportation of nuclear material on public highways, should be addressed by Vendors during their proposals.

Reviews and implementation during the MPP prototype development process will include an integrated and phased approach to compliance with planning and design, planning and construction, architecture and engineering, building construction, environmental, operating, safety and physical/cyber protection, emergency response planning, deconstruction, and spent fuel management requirements. 

A successful MPP prototype will provide a sound and demonstrated technological solution for commercial operations. A successful prototype will complete fuel load and testing phases and will be permitted by the Army Regulator to begin normal operations. The OTA prototype will transition to unrestricted operations as a COCO MPP with a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), production OTA, or other Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) based contract.

Desired Solution Features 

Desired solution features include the following attributes and capabilities: 

• Incorporates nuclear fuel that is enriched to 20% or less U-235 and that is legal for defense purposes. The fuel must be qualified, available, and fabricated on a timeline that will meet program timelines.  

  • Defense-purpose feedstock may be made available as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) for FOAK and SOAK MPPs through an Army fuel allocation process. If feedstock is provided as GFE, vendors will be responsible for transportation, blending, and fabrication of the fuel. 

  • Vendors should address the implications of a) the Government not providing feedstock as GFE, b) of the Government providing feedstock as GFE for only the first fueling, and c) the Government providing feedstock as GFE for the operational life of the MPP.

• Capable of producing electrical power in the range of kW-level up to 20MWe (up to 60 MWth). Capable of local control and dispatch and integrated to the greatest extent practicable into existing infrastructure, operations centers (if applicable), workflows, and operations and maintenance systems. 

• Capable of startup/shutdown and monitoring operations both with and without commercial power availability (both black start and grid-connected start capability). 

• Capable of MPP operations with a commercial power connection, and an alternative credited independent power source as a backup. 

• The MPP should be operated only from the control room located within the Army installation (remote or wireless operation is not allowed). 

  • MPPs with remote maintenance and diagnostics capabilities that comply with relevant cybersecurity U.S. Government standards, e.g., NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 for Federal Contractors, may be considered. 

  • The MPP control room must be designed to accommodate two operators, with space for an additional person, at a minimum. 

• The MPP design should include passive safety features to the extent practical to ensure MPP key safety functions are satisfied under all conditions, states, and modes. 

• Radiation exposure at the MPP site boundary should not exceed the limits provided in 10 CFR 20 during routine operations. Proposals must sufficiently account for relevant factors, including sky shine, emissions from activated site materials, and surrounding buildings at various elevations around the site boundary. 

• The MPP design must address Natural Hazard Phenomena, including seismic loads, external floods, and other potential hazards.

• The MPP design must have clearly articulated systems and safety case approaches, including an initial set of proposed design criteria and design safety strategy.

• Vendor strategy and capability to continuously provide full power supply for up to 30 years, including operations, maintenance, sustainment, and refueling activities. 

  • There are no restrictions on the proposed strategy to achieve 30-years of continuous power (e.g., refueling or ‘replaceable’ modules to maintain continuity of operations). 

  • The overall lifecycle strategy of the MPP by the Vendor will be evaluated and must include associated costs/risks with the proposed strategy for long-term operations.

• Non-core irradiated material should be removed or qualified for unrestricted release within 2 years upon completion or termination of the power production contract. An initial irradiated material disposal plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before design permitting. 

• Irradiated core material should be removed from the site notionally within 5 years of completion or termination of the power production contract, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Army. An initial core decommissioning plan, along with an associated finance structure, must be approved by the Army before MPP operations are permitted. 

• A target site area should be sized appropriately for FOAK (and SOAK if co-located) to ensure compliance with Federal radiation limits in 10 CFR 20 and the anticipated Seismic Design Category. Selected Vendors will be paired with an installation post-OTA award.

• Reasonable and appropriate safety, physical, cyber, and safeguards measures should be implemented in the design consistent with best practices. Army-specific requirements will be provided to vendors invited to participate in Phase 2 Pitches. 

• In addition to the above desired solution features, solutions must address the aspects below: 

  • A nuclear supply chain for nuclear-grade equipment that is clearly identified and credibly available to supply equipment to meet the notional timeline. The nuclear supply chain identified must meet defense-purpose limitations; any part of the nuclear supply chain reliant on international sources must be identified and mitigated with a plan approved by the Army.

  • Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) for equipment included in the design. The TRL and MRL readiness levels will be evaluated in depth during Phase 2 Pitches. 

  • Identified gaps in available Computational analytical tools, Codes, or Standards accepted for nuclear use. Identified analytical tools, Codes, or Standards for which the design will operate outside the approved range 

  • (e.g., the MPP operates at a higher temperature than existing foundational data).

  • Identified gaps in available material performance data for safety or reliability-related equipment under anticipated operating conditions.

  • Plans and approaches to move from FOAK to SOAK, to Nth-of-a-Kind development and production. Plans to commercialize or develop commercial versions of proposed MPP prototype designs.

  • Long-term plans for fuel acquisition and manufacturing, including the status of negotiations or agreements with miners, enrichers and/or fabricators. 

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct prototype funding, awardees gain substantial strategic advantages:

Government Validation & National Credibility
Winning a DIU/Army nuclear award signals unmatched credibility in defense nuclear innovation. This accelerates alignment with primes, utilities, and capital markets.

Path to Long-Term, Non-Dilutive Revenue
Successful prototypes can transition into 30-year Power Purchase Agreements, production OTAs, or FAR contracts, representing massive long-term revenue potential.

Increased Market Visibility
Awardees gain visibility across DoD, DOE, and national energy/security communities—often resulting in media coverage and faster customer traction.

Supply Chain & Regulatory Acceleration
Participation provides exposure to Army regulators, national labs, nuclear fuel providers, and defense-focused supply chain partners—accelerating commercialization beyond the defense market.

Higher Exit and Valuation Potential
Nondilutive support for FOAK/SOAK nuclear builds significantly increases company valuation, technical defensibility, and acquisition potential for defense, energy, and infrastructure buyers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Solution Brief Due: December 15, 2025

• DIU Review: ~30 days for down-select

• Phase 2 Pitch: Invitation-only, early 2026

• Full Proposal (Phase 3): Following successful pitch

• Prototype Awards: Rolling upon approval and funding availability

• FOAK Operation Goal: Before end of 2030

• SOAK Development: Begins near completion of FOAK design

Where does this funding come from?

Project Janus is funded through the U.S. Army and executed under the Defense Innovation Unit's Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process. Awards are made using Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) under 10 U.S.C. § 4022 (formerly § 2371b).

Who is eligible to apply?

U.S. and foreign-owned commercial companies

• Companies proposing fission-based microreactor designs

• Teams including reactor designers, fabricators, integrators, fuel cycle partners

• Vendors able to provide private financial contributions (projects relying solely on government funds are not eligible)

• Vendors able to comply with Section 889 and Army nuclear regulatory requirements

Multiple submissions and teaming arrangements are allowed.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants will:

• Demonstrate credible, deployable microreactor designs at TRL/MRL levels suitable for FOAK prototyping

• Present a robust plan for 30 years of operations, including refueling or replaceable module strategies

• Show credible nuclear supply chain access for fuel, components, and safety-critical systems

• Provide a realistic path from FOAK → SOAK → Nth-of-a-kind commercialization

• Demonstrate ability to meet Army regulatory requirements under AR 50-7

• Provide private cost share or financial contributions, as required in Phase 2

• Address cybersecurity, safety, passive safety features, and natural hazard requirements

• Show strong corporate viability and commercial market strategy (a key DIU evaluation factor)

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Remote or wireless operation of the MPP is not allowed; control room must be on-installation

• Vendors may not contact Army installations

• All proposals must be unclassified; CUI is not allowed

• Foreign-owned firms must be able to secure necessary clearances

• Vendors must address implications of fuel as GFE vs. vendor-supplied

• Submissions must comply with Army radiation exposure limits and 10 CFR 20

• Private financing participation is required to advance to Phase 2 and Phase 3

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions brief will take 50-75 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Solution Brief for $5000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.

DARPA Strategic Technology Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Strategic Technology Office (STO) BAA is soliciting breakthrough research concepts that create new mission-level capabilities beyond the current state of practice. The agency will fund a limited number of high-risk, high-reward proposals across a broad range of defense and national-security technical domains. Applications are due December 19, 2025.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA does not publish fixed award amounts for this BAA. STO funds a limited number of proposals, and budgets are determined by the technical approach, the scope of work, and alignment with STO priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

DARPA's STO seeks innovative ideas and disruptive technologies that provide the U.S. military and national security leaders with trusted, disruptive capabilities across all physical domains (Air, Space, Sea, and Land) and across the spectrum of competition. STO programs deliver solutions at speed and scale for today's warfighters while developing the resilient "breakthrough" systems and technologies needed for future battlespaces. STO does not focus on one area of responsibility or phenomenology. Rather, STO programs capture the strategic, logistical, and tactical complexity of today's national security environments. STO is a "systems office" seeking to create new "proof-of-concept" mission systems. Its goals are to develop and demonstrate new capabilities that expand what is technically possible.

Research areas of current interest to STO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

•  Acoustic communication and sensing

•  Adaptability

•  Advanced computing

•  Additive manufacturing

•  Architecture and advanced systems engineering

•  Artificial intelligence

•  Autonomy and control algorithms

•  "Big data" analytics

•  Combat identification

•  Command and control (C2)

•  Communications and networking, virtual and adaptive

•  Complexity management

•  Critical infrastructure defense

•  Decision aids and C2 technology

•  DevOps and novel software development and integration

•  Directed energy (DE)

•  Distributed autonomy and teaming (machine-machine, human-machine)

•  Economic security

•  Effects chain functions (disaggregated find, fix, finish, target, engage, assess)

•  Electro-optic/infrared sensors

•  Electromagnetic warfare (EW)

•  High-frequency (HF) communications and sensing

•  High voltage electric power systems and architecture

•  Human behavior modeling

•  Human-machine symbiosis

•  Industrial engineering

•  Integration and reliability technologies

•  Interoperability

•  Logistics

•  Modeling and simulation

•  Microwave and millimeter wave communications and sensing

•  Novel kinetic effects

•  Non-kinetic effects (EW, DE, cyber)

•  Optical technologies

•  Photonics

•  Radio technologies (especially software-defined and novel waveforms and processing)

•  Radar and adaptive arrays

•  Resilient systems

•  Robotics

•  Seekers and other expendable sensors and processing

•  Sensors and analytics

•  Signal processing

•  Space sensors, communications, autonomy, and architectures (especially supporting proliferated low earth orbit constellations)

•  Strategy analysis technology

•  Supply chain analytics

•  System of systems

•  Undersea and seabed technology

•  Tactics development technology

•  Testing and data collection

•  Very low earth orbit (VLEO) technology

•  Very low frequency (VLF) technology

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, DARPA funding offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Receiving a DARPA award signals exceptional scientific and engineering merit, which accelerates engagement with primes, integrators, strategic partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
DARPA programs are frequently highlighted in federal communications, technical conferences, and defense media—boosting your company’s profile across the national security sector.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain access to DARPA program managers, government labs, test ranges, and a high-level innovation network—opening doors to future contracts and partnerships.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive funding that matures breakthrough technology, combined with the DARPA “stamp,” often increases valuation and attractiveness to large defense, aerospace, semiconductor, and AI-focused acquirers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Applications are due December 19, 2025.

DARPA does not publish a fixed award timeline.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Strategic Technology Office (STO), a DoD organization responsible for advanced mission-level systems and emerging technologies.

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposals must not duplicate existing STO programs or other active STO BAAs.

• Research that yields incremental or “evolutionary” improvements is specifically excluded.

• Offerors are strongly encouraged to review current STO programs and speak with program managers before applying.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 Project + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) – Mines & Metals Capacity Expansion – Piloting Byproduct Critical Minerals and Materials Recovery at Domestic Industrial Facilities (DE-FOA-0003583)

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, through NETL, is offering up to $275 million under DE-FOA-0003583 to fund large pilot facilities that recover byproduct critical materials from coal-based and other industrial feedstocks, mine waste, and process wastes. Projects will design, construct, and operate 1:50-scale or larger pilots that produce market-ready critical material products and generate the data needed for near-term commercial facilities in the United States. Applications are due December 15, 2025, at 5:00 pm EST.

How much funding would I receive?

For this NOFO, funding is structured by topic area:

• Topic Area 1 – Mines & Metals Pilots – Coal-Based Industry

  • Total funding: up to $75 million.

  • Approximate number of awards: 0–3.

  • Approximate award size: $10 million–$50 million per project.

  • Minimum cost share: 20% of total project costs.

  • Approximate project period: 48 months.

• Topic Area 2 – Mines & Metals Pilots – All Industries

  • Total funding: up to $200 million.

  • Approximate number of awards: 0–10.

  • Approximate award size: $10 million–$75 million per project.

  • Minimum cost share: 20% of total project costs.

  • Approximate project period: up to 48 months.

Actual award sizes and number of awards will depend on appropriations, application quality, and DOE priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

Program Goals and Objectives:

This NOFO invests in American industrial facilities that have the potential to produce valuable critical materials from existing industrial processes and legacy waste streams. Industries such as mining and mineral processing, power generation, coal, oil and gas, specialty metals, and basic materials have the potential to recover valuable materials that will address many of America’s most severe mineral vulnerabilities. The goal of this NOFO is to increase domestic critical material production.

American industrial facilities have enormous potential to recover valuable mineral coproducts and byproducts from ongoing operations and legacy waste streams such as mine tailings, impoundments, and coal ash. To de-risk industry investments, the technology for recovering these materials must be piloted under real-world conditions and at a scale relevant to each industry.

This NOFO will support the design, construction, and operation of large (1:50 scale or larger), ‘right-sized’ pilot processing systems at domestic industrial facilities. Successful pilots may produce a wide variety of critical material products, including oxides, salts, metals, alloys, and non-critical material value-added products.

DOE envisions that the large pilots will generate critical information resulting in near-term commercial project viability. Successful pilots will reduce technical uncertainty and financial risk prior to commercial deployment. Should funding and DOE goals align, NOFO award recipients may be considered eligible for possible follow-on scale-up funding opportunities, should DOE pursue such ventures.

Expected Performance Goals:

Performers will design, construct, and operate large pilot facilities (1:50 scale or larger) to produce critical materials necessary for our energy, defense, and economic security and to de-risk commercial scale production technologies to grow new economic and manufacturing opportunities.

Projects will produce qualified market-ready critical material products and other value-added materials with potential offtake agreements. Projects will show they are on track to meet their pilot objectives by producing defined quantities of critical materials at the proposed scales in each phase, subject to evaluation through go/no-go milestones. In addition, projects will generate the critically needed information and operational data required for the development of a near-term commercial facility within the U.S.

Two topic areas are defined based on eligible feedstock and the technology readiness level (TRL). See the attached Technology Readiness Level Reference for TRL definitions.

• Topic Area 1: Mines & Metals Pilots—Coal-Based Industry

  Small pilot-scale facilities (TRL 5) that have demonstrated the capabilities of producing REE and other critical materials from coal-based resources shall be scaled for design, construction, and operation as large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale facilities (TRL 7) for the production of market-ready REE and other critical materials, and for generation of critically essential design information and operational data necessary for near-term, future operation of a commercial processing facility (TRL 8) by no later than 2030.

  Topic Area 1 requires the use of coal and coal byproducts as feedstocks with minor or limited emphasis on the use of other (non-coal) industrial-based mining materials. Domestic coal-based feedstock materials (e.g., lignite, refuse tailings, etc.) and/or industrial coal-based wastes (e.g., prep plant wastes, power generation fly/bottom ash, coal-based AMD, etc.) shall be utilized. REE recovery is the required focus of Topic Area 1, preferably with co-recovery of other critical materials and other value-added materials; Critical materials recovery without REE recovery and other value-added material production without REE recovery are not of interest.

• Topic Area 2: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries

  This topic area broadly supports piloting the recovery of valuable critical material byproducts and other value-added products from industrial feedstocks, processes, and process wastes including mine waste. Example projects in Topic Area 2 could include critical material recovery from bauxite residue processing, valorization of zinc processing byproducts (e.g., indium from zinc smelting), and valorization of numerous critical materials from ongoing processing of titanium, phosphorous, lead, oil & gas or other industry wastes or production processes. Impounded or stockpiled waste materials are in scope. Modular, mobile, or fixed sites are in scope.

  In Topic Area 2, the applicant will establish large, pilot-scale facilities for production of valuable critical material byproducts from industry operations and/or wastes at the specific TRL ranges described in the subtopics below. These facilities will generate data and information needed for validation of future, near-term domestic commercial production of market-ready critical materials.

  Topic Area 2 requires the use of feedstocks from industrial feedstocks, processes, or process wastes including mine waste. For example, this may include (1) residual material from processing; (2) process streams, process byproducts, secondary materials, and/or waste materials that are produced by industry’s production; or (3) conventional ore (including monazite, bastnaesite, and/or other domestically mined materials) processing waste or waste materials such as residues, slimes, or below-cutoff grade ore or other mined material.

  Feedstocks for Topic Area 2 can come from all industry sources other than coal-based industry and feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling.

  Subtopic 2a: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries—Prior Bench-Scale Facilities

  Subtopic 2a is focused on industrial processes for critical materials recovery that have been developed at a bench-scale TRL of 4 or 5. The objective of Subtopic 2a is to accelerate technology development that leverages industry’s existing bench-scale (TRL 4) or small pilot-scale (TRL 5) process design concepts and scales those processes or systems for design, construction, and operation of a large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale facility (TRL 7).

  Subtopic 2b: Mines & Metals Pilots—All Industries—Prior Pilot-Scale Facilities

  Subtopic 2b is focused on industrial processes for critical materials recovery that have been developed at a pilot-scale TRL of 6 or 7 (7 preferred). The objective of Subtopic 2b is to accelerate technology development that leverages industry’s existing pilot-scale facility (TRL 6 or 7, 7 preferred) process design concepts and scales those processes or systems for design, construction, and operation of a large, ‘right-sized’ pilot-scale mineral production facility (TRL 7 or 8, 8 preferred).aterial byproducts and other value-added products from industrial feedstocks, processes, and process wastes including mine waste. Feedstocks for Topic Area 2 can come from all industry sources other than coal-based industry and feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling.

  Previously developed bench-scale efforts identified for Subtopic 2a are expected to advance the TRL of their process/system from 4 or 5 to 7. Previously developed pilot-scale efforts identified for Subtopic 2b are expected to advance the TRL of their process/system from 6 or 7 to 7 or 8.

  Applications to Topic Area 2 can recover any critical material.

• Information and Requirements for both Topic Areas

  The following information applies to all Topic Areas and Subtopics.

  The overall objective is to design, construct, and operate large pilot critical material production facilities (1:50 scale or larger) in the U.S. that will produce critical material byproducts from industrial processes. These pilots will deliver critical data needed for near-term commercial scale-up by using real-world industrial feedstocks and materials for verification and validation of the commercial potential of their processes/system, including, but not limited to:

  • data on the performance of individual processing circuits/systems and their overall integration,

  • process models,

  • capital and operating costs,

  • scaling factors, and

  • feedstock and end-product characterization
  
  Critical Material Byproduct Targets at Domestic Industrial Sites

  Applications must focus on the development of fully operational processing systems, located at and integrated with a domestic industrial site, that will be operated in a continuous/semi-continuous manner to produce market-ready critical materials. DOE Critical Materials include all minerals on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) List of Critical Minerals plus additional materials for energy. It is within scope to produce any market-ready critical material including critical material concentrates, high purity materials, or material commodities such as mixed oxides, salts, alloys, etc.

  Applicants are encouraged to consider production of materials that support both energy security and national defense needs. Applicants are also encouraged to reference the DOE Critical Materials List12 and USGS 2025 Mineral Commodity Summaries Report.13 Of particular interest are the production of critical materials with low or zero current domestic production. Critical materials with limited domestic production include arsenic, antimony, bismuth, chromium, fluorine, gallium, germanium, graphite, indium, manganese, magnesium, niobium, scandium, tantalum, tin, tungsten, rare earth elements, and yttrium.

  Large Pilot-Scale Facility Size and Operational Information

  The large (1:50 scale or larger) pilot-scale systems of interest in this NOFO should be ‘right-sized’ to demonstrate production of critical materials in quantity and purity specifications to support and establish the basis for near-term commercial production of saleable critical materials. The ’right-sized’, large pilot must have a critical material production capacity target of at least 2% (1:50 scale) of a commercial-scale system. For example, if the targeted critical material production of a large pilot-scale facility is 25 metric tons per year (tpy), and it is identified that commercial-scale systems for that targeted material generally produce 300 tpy, then the large pilot-scale facility would produce 25/300 = 8.3% of a commercial-scale system.
  
  Feedstock and Byproduct Critical Material Target

  The intent is to pilot potential byproduct material valorization at industrial sites including ongoing industrial production streams and waste impounded at active sites or sites of former industrial activity. The use of domestic feedstocks is preferred. Any feedstock located within the U.S. is considered domestic regardless of its original source. For example, mine waste at a U.S. facility that was originally mined from foreign territory is considered a domestic feedstock. No federal funding can be used to procure foreign feedstock.

  Applications proposing feedstock materials related to post-consumer and manufacturing scrap recycling are specifically not of interest.

  Applicants must identify the feedstock and quantify the feedstock throughput and critical material production, in terms of metric tons per year, that:

  • has been successfully demonstrated in their existing bench-scale or pilot-scale system on actual (non-simulated) feedstocks,

  • is targeted for their proposed large pilot-scale facility,

  • is generally targeted in ideal commercial-scale systems, and

  • is targeted for future commercial-scale operation at the site.

  Applicants must state the purity specification of the commercial market-ready critical materials to be produced. The large pilot projects must aim to meet specific quantity and purity standards for the critical material(s) produced or explain why that is not technically, operationally, or economically feasible or appropriate for this project.

  In addition, applicants must describe the overall impact of the large pilot-scale system, as well as a potential future commercial-scale system, on the foreign import reliance for each critical material produced. For example, the large pilot-scale system may reduce import reliance of a specific critical material from 90% to possibly 85% and a future commercial-scale system may further reduce the import reliance to possibly 50%.

  Projects must utilize feedstock materials that are sufficiently abundant to support the awarded project and maintain future pilot operational capacity for a minimum of five years. Applicants must provide evidence of material availability in the quantity needed to fulfill this 5-year requirement. A letter of support should be included in the application from all companies, agencies, or other parties that have ownership/rights to any proposed feedstock materials to allow large pilot-scale facility operation for the performance of the award (e.g., if utilizing coal ash, please provide a letter of support from the power or coal company who is producing the ash). If no letters of support can be obtained, applicants must provide an explanation in the Technical Volume as to why they are not necessary, or how the necessary feedstock is intended to be obtained.

  Large pilot-scale facilities are encouraged to exhibit feedstock flexibility, enabling them to process multiple feedstock types (e.g., bauxite red mud, kaolinite clay, and/or phosphate wastes) within the same facility, though not necessarily concurrently. Strategies that bolster pilot facility resilience by processing diverse feedstocks or offering modularity or mobility are particularly encouraged. Pilot production of multiple critical materials is also encouraged.

  Facility Technical Feasibility and Prior Work

  Applicants are required to:

  • Provide information that demonstrates the technical feasibility of their existing technology for processing the proposed feedstock to produce the critical material(s) of interest at their application’s starting TRL. Actual (non-simulated) feedstock materials must have been used with processes operated in a continuous/semi-continuous manner.

  • Submit photographs of existing systems to demonstrate existing process scale and capabilities.

  • Provide an estimate of the time to acquire any required site permits and time for construction. These estimates will be revised with actual timelines during project execution.

  Applicants should include information relevant to costing, such as Feasibility Studies (pre-Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) based on an AACE Class 4 Cost Estimate25) in the Application Package. Each large-scale pilot is required to be designed, constructed, and operated in a manner to generate relevant new information to aid future development of a commercial system (TRL 8, FEED Study based on an AACE Class 3 Cost Estimate). Development of a FEED Study for the future commercial system is not within scope of this NOFO.

  Where separation, extraction, and recovery processes have been developed by industry, process flowsheets (to the extent that non-proprietary information can be made available) and critical material recovery performance should be described.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, this NOFO offers several strategic advantages for companies advancing large pilot-scale critical mineral recovery technologies:

Market Readiness and Investor Confidence
DOE-supported pilot facilities are positioned as a critical bridge to commercialization. Successfully operating a DOE-funded pilot—using real industrial feedstocks at meaningful scale—signals to customers, strategic partners, and investors that your technology is technically validated, financially de-risked, and ready for larger commercial deployment.

Risk Reduction and Safer Scale-Up
The program is structured to help teams identify technical, operational, and integration risks before committing to full-scale capital build-out. Generating continuous or semi-continuous operational data under DOE oversight gives companies greater certainty around project feasibility, cost structure, and long-term performance.

National-Level Visibility and Ecosystem Access
Participation in a DOE-funded pilot often increases visibility within federal agencies, national labs, and the broader critical minerals sector. Awardees are well-positioned for future federal contracting, R&D collaboration, and follow-on scale-up opportunities—subject to DOE priorities and merit review.

Technology Validation that Strengthens Supply Chain Positioning
Producing tonnage-level critical material outputs under DOE-supported conditions enhances credibility with downstream processors and manufacturers. This validation helps companies form off-take relationships, strategic partnerships, and potential commercial agreements.

Workforce, Skills, and Operational Capabilities
Standing up a pilot facility develops advanced operational expertise within your organization—expertise that becomes a competitive advantage when transitioning to full commercial-scale deployment and building long-term U.S.-based critical materials infrastructure.

Collectively, these benefits reinforce domestic supply chain resilience and strengthen a company’s strategic position in the emerging U.S. critical minerals and materials ecosystem.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Application Deadline: December 15, 2025, 5:00 pm EST

• Anticipated Selection Notification Date: January 16, 2026

• Anticipated Conditional Award Date: January 23, 2026

• Anticipated Award Date: June 15, 2026

• Estimated Period of Performance: June 15, 2026 – June 14, 2030 (up to ~48 months)

Where does this funding come from?

Funding for DE-FOA-0003583 comes from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), specifically Section 41003(b)-(c), and uses FY 2024–2026 funds. The NOFO is issued by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), and administered by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL).

Who is eligible to apply?

The NOFO is open primarily to domestic entities as recipients or subrecipients, including:

• Institutions of higher education

• For-profit organizations

• Nonprofit organizations

• State and local governmental entities

• Indian Tribes (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 5304)

To qualify as a domestic entity, an organization must:

• Be organized, chartered, incorporated, or otherwise formed under the laws of a U.S. state or territory.

• Have its principal place of business in the United States.

• Have majority U.S. ownership and control.

• Have a physical place of business in the United States.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals will be scored according to the following criteria:

Scientific and Technical Merit (50%) – Projects that demonstrate strong scientific grounding, a clear understanding of critical materials recovery, a credible pilot concept, and a realistic commercialization pathway. Competitive proposals show how the pilot is “right-sized” for near-term scale-up and may leverage multiple feedstocks or produce multiple critical material products.

Technical Approach (30%) – Proposals with a well-structured SOPO and Project Management Plan, the ability to begin operations quickly, and a clear path to steady-state critical material production. High-scoring projects show meaningful tonnage potential, robust risk mitigation, and a logical workplan tied to impactful commercial outcomes.

Team Capabilities (20%) – Applicants with strong financial stability, the ability to meet the 20% cost share, and demonstrated experience operating pilot facilities or complex processing systems. Competitive teams typically include industry partners, off-take relationships, established roles, and adequate facilities and equipment.

Additional Selection Factors – Projects that diversify feedstocks or regions, contribute meaningfully to the DOE critical materials portfolio, create high-quality U.S. jobs, align with Buy America preferences, and show a credible path to a future commercial facility are more likely to be selected.

Projects that can stand up large, U.S.-based pilot operations and demonstrate a high-confidence pathway to commercial deployment will be the strongest contenders.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

DOE anticipates awarding cooperative agreements under this NOFO, which include a statement of DOE’s “substantial involvement” in the work performed under the resulting awards. For cooperative agreements, DOE does not limit its involvement to the administrative requirements of the award. Instead, DOE has substantial involvement in the direction and redirection of the technical aspects of the project. DOE’s substantial involvement in resulting awards may include the following:

A. DOE shares responsibility with the recipient for the management, control, direction, and performance of the project.

B. DOE may intervene in the conduct or performance of work under this award for programmatic reasons. Intervention includes the interruption or modification of the conduct or performance of project activities.

C. DOE may redirect or discontinue funding the project based on the outcome of DOE’s evaluation of the project at the Go/No-Go decision point(s).

D. DOE participates in major project decision-making processes.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission will likely take 160–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Flat Fee + Success Fee rate can be quoted depending on the size of the project.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

• See the solicitation here.

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) – Mine of the Future – Proving Ground Initiative (DE-FOA-0003390)

Executive Summary:

DOE’s Mine of the Future – Proving Ground Initiative (DE-FOA-0003390) will provide approximately $5 million to $40 million per cooperative agreement (about $80 million total, up to four awards) to establish field-scale mining technology proving grounds and run initial mine technology projects focused on critical minerals and materials. The Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) was issued November 14, 2025, and complete applications are due December 15, 2025. DOE anticipates making conditional selections in January 2026, with awards expected to start around June 15, 2026, for an estimated 4-year project period.

How much funding would I receive?

DOE anticipates:

• Approximate total available funding: $80,000,000 (FY26).

• Approximate number of awards: up to four.

• Approximate dollar amount of individual awards: $5,000,000 to $40,000,000.

Awards will be structured as cooperative agreements with an approximate 48-month project period, organized into three budget periods (two for proving ground development and one for initial project execution).

The cost share must be at least 20% of the total project costs for research and development.

What could I use the funding for?

Summary:

The Department of Energy (DOE), through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), intends to support the establishment of Mining Technology Proving Grounds that will act as specialized mining technology testing and research facilities. The primary objective of this funding opportunity is to develop and operate field-scale proving grounds that serve as testbeds for validating and de-risking emerging mining technologies. Additionally, these proving grounds are expected to provide the necessary infrastructure, operating environment, and technical capabilities to enable the advancement of innovative technologies from laboratory and/or bench-scale development to integrated field-scale demonstration.

DOE’s vision includes encouraging robust and lasting industry and academic partnerships (e.g., consortia, joint industry partnerships), thereby creating a vital pipeline for innovative technologies and a skilled workforce in mining that will serve as a foundation for domestic mining innovation for many years to come. In addition, applicants must also propose a minimum of one (1) and no more than two (2) mining technology development projects to be conducted at the proving ground. These envisioned mining technology development projects must demonstrate clear progression from laboratory and/or bench-scale validation to field-scale testing at the proving ground site by progressing the proposed technology by at least one TRL from the project(s) beginning. Initial mine technology projects can start anywhere from TRL 2 to TRL 6. Due to the accelerated schedule for this NOFO, if selected, the applicant may be asked to amend the initial projects further during the negotiation and/or definitization process. In summary, FE is requiring applications to include two distinct elements 1) establishment of proving ground and 2) mine technology project(s) that would utilize and demonstrate efficacy of the proving ground.

The proving grounds funded under this announcement will serve as critical platforms to reduce the technical and economic risks associated with novel mining technologies to be utilized by government agencies, industrial partners, and academic institutions. By advancing promising technologies through field-scale validation, the program will accelerate pathways to commercialization, thereby supporting secure, sustainable, and responsible U.S. mining operations.

The DOE aims for a diverse portfolio of proving ground facilities to demonstrate a broad range of mining technologies across various mineral types, geologic settings, and operational scales. The varied estimated award amounts for individual awards reflect DOE's desire to support diverse facility designs, allowing for proving grounds of varying scales, complexities, and capabilities, leveraging existing infrastructure, and enabling targeted technology demonstration across mining process stages.

Program Goals and Objectives:

This NOFO seeks applications to address the establishment of Mining Technology Proving Grounds and accelerate the development of innovative technologies for the U.S. mining sector. This initiative aims to re-establish U.S. leadership in mining by fostering real-world testing, optimization, and deployment of next generation mining technologies, addressing a critical need for secure and resilient domestic Critical Mineral (CM) supply networks.

The primary goal is to establish a field-scale mine proving ground in Budget Period (BP) 1 and BP 2. This facility will host one or two initial R&D envisioned projects in BP 3, focusing on technologies that have progressed beyond laboratory/bench-scale. The objective is to de-risk new mining technologies for commercialization and industry adoption. For purposes of this NOFO, Proving Ground and Facility are used interchangeably and indicate the site in which the envisioned project will be carried out. Additionally, initial mine technology projects can be used interchangeably with Projects, Envisioned Projects, and mine technologies and describe the projects carried out in the Facility in BP 3. Furthermore, for the purposes of this NOFO, Critical Minerals (CM) and Critical Minerals and Materials (CMM) are used interchangeably.

DOE envisions that, once established, these proving ground facilities will represent national assets that can accelerate technology innovation by serving as collaborative platforms for future DOE funded projects and as shared resources for industry, academia, and other partners, aligned with DOE mission priorities and subject to the availability of funding.

See more information below:

• Strategic Aims

  This program seeks to re-establish U.S. leadership in the mining sector by supporting R&D in both conventional and unconventional methods and resources. Technology areas include: ore body/resource exploration, appraisal, mining, processing, automation, energy management, and waste management. The proving grounds will facilitate field-scale testing and maturation of innovative technologies for responsible critical mineral mining, streamlining processes, and reducing risks and costs.

  This competitive funding opportunity will support awards for infrastructure development and technologies that transform mining practices. The proving grounds should be designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of Mine Technology projects and will facilitate the maturation of advanced mining technologies. The Mine Technology projects can range from laboratory and/or bench-scale (TRL 2) to field-scale (TRL 6) and must be able to transition at least one TRL from the project’s start. The proving ground will aid in overcoming the "valley of death" where promising technologies often stall due to a lack of suitable testing environments. These sites will also serve as vital training grounds for a new generation of skilled American miners.

• Core Objectives of Proving Grounds

  The proving ground facilities are designed to accelerate the entire exploration-to-production timeline, realizing the "Mine of the Future" vision by de-risking mining technology, developing new methods to reduce waste, and increasing co-product recovery from conventional mining. They will also enhance mineral recovery, emphasize small-footprint mining, foster low-impact tailings management, develop a skilled workforce, improve the sector’s public image, and support regulatory agencies in adopting tested innovations.

• Specific Proving Ground Competencies

  Centralized testing facilities can play a vital role in innovation within the mining industry by streamlining processes, enhancing collaboration, ensuring compliance, and ultimately fostering the development of safer, more efficient, and environmentally friendly mining technologies. The Proving Ground should establish these competencies.

  • Standardization of Procedures - Establish standardized testing protocols and methodologies, ensuring consistent results across various innovations to aid in comparing outcomes and determining the effectiveness of new technologies.

  • Resource Optimization - Reduce barriers to smaller companies and startups through shared resources such as advanced equipment, instrumentation, and skilled personnel, leading to cost savings and increased efficiency. This will deliver the benefit from access to high-quality testing without the burden of establishing their own facilities and staff.

  • Controlled Environment - Provide controlled environments that minimize external variables that could affect test outcomes. This is particularly important for mining technologies, where factors such as geological conditions and environmental impacts can substantially influence performance.

  • Data Collection and Analysis - Support comprehensive data collection and analysis, facilitating better R&D practices and outcomes. This leads to faster iteration and improvement of technologies based on empirical evidence derived from extensive testing.

  • Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing - Serves as a hub for collaboration among various stakeholders, including academic institutions, industry leaders, and regulatory bodies. Facilitate anonymization and publication. Such collaboration can enhance knowledge sharing and accelerate innovation within the mining sector.

  • Regulatory Compliance - Aids new mining technologies in compliance with safety and environmental regulations. The testing facilities can ensure that all tests adhere to relevant standards, facilitating smoother certification processes and reducing the time to market for new technologies.

  • Market Readiness - Accelerates market readiness by validating new technologies against real industry standards and performance expectations. Through testing at the proving ground, companies and investors gain confidence that these innovations are ready for increased investment and large-scale adoption.

  • Risk Management - Identify potential risks and challenges associated with new technologies in a controlled environment before they are deployed at actual mining operations. This enhances safety and reduces the likelihood of costly failures.

• Collaborative Approach and Investment

  Successful R&D efforts and proving grounds will be built on partnerships between eligible entities providing training opportunities for future American miners. This initiative aims to accelerate R&D progress from development to commercialization in the field. It will address gaps that neither universities nor the private sector typically prioritize for investment.

• Mine Technology Projects (TRL 2-6)

  Applicants should propose high impact mining technology projects (TRL 2-6) that require field testing to advance to TRL 7 and beyond.

  Projects are recommended, but not required to align with one of three technology development areas:

  1. Resource Characterization and Exploration

  2. Mining and Processing

  3. Equipment and Productivity

  An example list of Specific R&D Technology Areas of Interest that can fit into these three categories is below.

  DOE will fund mining technology projects that can be developed past laboratory/bench-scale and subsequently tested and demonstrated in a field-scale proving ground. Proving ground test beds will be constructed within the first two budget periods of the award, with technology testing occurring in later years. To ensure the award of high-quality projects through the proving ground, applicants are required to propose at least one mine technology project for development and validation at the facility. A maximum of two proposed projects per applicant may be awarded. If the applicant’s proposal is selected, these initial projects may be amended during negotiations and/or definitization.

  In addition to these initial projects, once established, DOE anticipates that these proving ground facilities will serve as platforms to host other DOE funded R&D activities and collaborations, and will be made available as resources to industry, academia, and other research partners. Utilization of these facilities for additional efforts will be subject to DOE programmatic priorities, merit review, and the availability of future funding.

• Research Focus: Innovative Critical Mineral Recovery

  Projects will develop and test innovative mining technologies for recovery of CMM from domestic ores. The goal is to enhance efficiencies, reduce environmental impact, minimize waste, and improve recovery by integrating automation, selective recovery, and modular mobile infrastructure for sustainable mining operations.

• Specific R&D Technology Areas of Interest

  The following is a list of R&D technical areas of interest and is not comprehensive. Other relevant technologies may be included in applications.

  • Comminution & Rock Mechanics

    • Comminution Efficiency - Technologies to improve mineral ore comminution efficiency and reduce grinding energy consumption (physical, chemical, electrochemical).

    • Rock Fracturing & Permeability - Techniques to improve rock fracturing, pore connection, and permeability, enhancing in situ critical mineral extraction efficacy (physical, mechanical).

  • Extraction: In situ Leaching - Methods for mineral extraction that minimize surface disruption and waste.

  • Automation & Robotics - Technologies to automate manual mining tasks (e.g., visual inspection, sampling, material movement) using drones and robotics; development of subsurface hardware, sensors, and computational tools for automation and robotics in ore digging, hauling, extraction, and processing.

  • Data & Sensing

    • Advanced Drilling - Drilling technologies with real-time sensing capabilities.

    • Real-time Material Tracking - Technologies to track and monitor mineralogy of feedstock/ore streams (solid, liquid, slurry) in real-time at the mine or processing plant.

    • Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML) - Algorithms to optimize equipment efficiency, resource extraction, and processing; development of autonomous vehicles and machinery; internet of things (IoT) applications for remote operations and monitoring.

    • Advanced Sensing - Methods or tools for detecting underground ore mineralization and low-grade mineral zones in tailings/refuse. Includes techniques for improved subsurface characterization for precision extraction, sensing while drilling, and exploratory drilling.

    • Data Utilization - Collection and utilization of big data, neural networks, AI/ML for subsurface/deep ground resource mapping and mineral exploration, including 3-D volumetric assessment.

• Key Objectives

  • Assess mining technologies for efficiency, cost, and recovery.

  • Develop methods to process low-grade ores, minimize waste rock, and reduce water use.

  • Implement selective recovery and physical concentration techniques for ore and tailings.

  • Create modular, reconfigurable units for flexible deployment and reduced site disturbance.

• Technical Requirements

  For the Proving Ground Facility:

  The Proving Ground must serve as a testbed for next-generation mining technologies, emphasizing modularity, data integration, and real-world validation of critical mineral extraction, processing, and environmental management solutions.

  General Infrastructure Requirements:

  • Location and Access: Must be within the United States with demonstrated access to mineralized materials or simulated deposits representative of CM (e.g., REEs, graphite, lithium, nickel, cobalt).

  • Operational Readiness: Must include site utilities, safety infrastructure, and permitting to enable field-scale operations up to TRL 7.

  • Modularity: Facility design must support plug-and-play testing of multiple technology platforms and allow for reconfiguration to accommodate different mineral systems and extraction processes.

  • Scalability: Capable of expanding operations to accommodate future demonstration projects or partnerships. Designs, flowsheets, and plans for a scalable field test facility handling large quantities of materials at a pilot scale.

  • Simultaneous Operation: Preference for proving grounds capable of operating multiple R&D projects simultaneously, even if only one is initially proposed.

  Technical Capabilities and Instrumentation:

  • Data Acquisition & Monitoring: Deploy a comprehensive digital monitoring system integrating geophysical, geochemical, and operational data into a unified platform (AI/ML-ready).

  • Autonomous & Remote Operations: Infrastructure should support operation and testing of autonomous or teleoperated vehicles, robotic systems, and AI-enabled sensing.

  • Environmental Monitoring: Real-time air, water, and soil monitoring systems must be included to assess environmental impacts and validate sustainable mining methods.

  • Simulation & Digital Twin: Integration with a digital twin environment for real-time simulation, prediction, and validation of process performance.

  Safety, Compliance, and Sustainability:

  • Safety Protocols: Must adhere to applicable Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety standards, with site-specific health and safety plans in place.

  • Environmental Compliance: Must demonstrate conformance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, and other applicable federal and state environmental regulations.

  • Sustainability Metrics: Establish baselines for emissions, waste, and energy use; must include monitoring and reporting mechanisms for continuous improvement.

  • Community and Workforce Integration: Include local workforce engagement and training opportunities.

  Workforce and Collaboration Hub:

  • Workforce and Training Integration: Should include provisions for hands-on training, workforce development, and educational use.

  • Visitor and Collaboration Center: For engaging with government, industry, academia, and public.

  For R&D Mine Technology Projects:

  Each applicant must identify up to two (2) initial projects to be demonstrated at the developed proving ground to validate its functionality and de-risk new mining technologies. Proposed initial projects under this funding opportunity may be asked to be amended during negotiations if selected.

  Technical Maturity:

  • Readiness Level: Proposed technologies must be at TRL 2–6 at project start and demonstrate advancement increasing at least one TRL by project completion.

  • Integration with Proving Ground: Must demonstrate compatibility with the facility’s modular systems, safety framework, and data acquisition protocols.

  • Performance Metrics: Include clear performance indicators (e.g., recovery efficiency, selectivity, energy intensity, environmental footprint) and justification of economic and technological advantages over conventional methods.

  Environmental and Safety Considerations:

  • Environmental Footprint: Each project must quantify reductions in waste, emissions, or water/energy consumption compared to baseline operations.

  • Safety Plan: Provide a project-specific safety and hazard mitigation plan consistent with the Proving Ground’s operational safety framework.

  Collaboration and Commercialization:

  • Industry and Academic Partnerships: Demonstrate engagement with industry and/or academia, to support commercialization and workforce development.

  • Transition Plan: Include a post-demonstration pathway outlining next steps toward commercialization or follow-on pilot deployment.

• Technology Readiness Level (TRL)

  Research should begin between TRL 2-6 and aim to advance at a minimum of one TRL by the completion of work at the proving ground.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, the NOFO describes several programmatic benefits associated with the proving grounds:

• Market Readiness and Investor Confidence
  The proving grounds are explicitly framed as a way to accelerate market readiness by validating new technologies against real industry standards and performance expectations. Testing at these facilities is intended to give companies and investors greater confidence that innovations are ready for larger-scale adoption.

• Risk Management and Safer Deployment
  Proving grounds allow identification of technical and operational risks in a controlled environment before deploying technologies in active mining operations. This supports improved safety and reduces the likelihood of costly failures.

• National Resource and Ecosystem Access
  Once established, DOE envisions that these facilities will serve as a national resource, accessible to:

  • Multiple DOE offices,

  • Industry partners,

  • Academia, and

  • Other research organizations.

  DOE anticipates that, beyond the initial projects, the proving grounds will be used to host additional DOE-funded R&D activities and collaborations, subject to DOE priorities, merit review, and future funding availability.

• Training, Skills, and Workforce Development
  The program is designed to provide a training platform, disseminating skills, technologies, practices, and expertise needed for responsible mining and critical materials supply chains.

All of these benefits are explicitly tied in the NOFO to strengthening secure, resilient domestic critical mineral and material supply networks and restoring U.S. prominence in the mining sector.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The NOFO specifies the following key dates:

• Application Deadline: December 15, 2025

• Anticipated Selection Notification Date: January 16, 2026

• Anticipated Conditional Award Date: January 23, 2026

• Anticipated Award Date (project start): June 15, 2026

• Estimated Period of Performance: June 15, 2026 – June 14, 2030 (approximately 4 years)

Where does this funding come from?

The initiative is issued by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), Critical Minerals and Materials (CMM) Program.

Awards made under this NOFO will be funded, in whole or in part, with funds appropriated under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).

The activities support Sections 7001(a) and 7002(g) of the Energy Act of 2020, as funded by IIJA Section 41003(c), and are part of a broader federal effort to advance and potentially commercialize technologies that use unconventional resources to produce critical minerals and materials for U.S. energy, national security, and commodity needs.

Who is eligible to apply?

• Eligible domestic entities (as applicants/recipients):

  • Institutions of higher education

  • For-profit entities

  • Nonprofit organizations

  • State and local governmental entities

  • Indian Tribes (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 5304)

• To qualify as a domestic entity, an organization must:

  • Be organized under the laws of a U.S. state or territory or under U.S. federal law,

  • Have majority domestic ownership and control, and

  • Have a physical place of business in the United States.

• FFRDCs and federal agencies:

  • DOE FFRDCs: Eligible to participate only as subrecipients, not as prime recipients.

  • Non-DOE FFRDCs: Eligible to participate as subrecipients, not as recipients.

  • Federal agencies and instrumentalities (other than DOE): May generally participate as subrecipients but are typically not eligible to be recipients.

  • NETL is explicitly not eligible to receive awards under this announcement and may not be included as a recipient or subrecipient.

• Foreign entities:

  • In general, foreign entities are not eligible to apply as either recipients or subrecipients.

  • Foreign participation is only possible under limited circumstances with an explicit written waiver request included in the application (and, for each foreign subrecipient, a separate waiver).

• Work location requirement:

  • All work must be performed in the United States unless a waiver of this requirement is requested and approved. Costs for work performed outside the U.S. are unallowable without such a waiver.

• Other statutory ineligibilities:

  • Entities on the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals list are prohibited from doing business with the U.S. government and are not eligible.

  • Nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engaged in lobbying activities after December 31, 1995, are not eligible to apply.

  • Entities of Concern (as defined in NOFO Part 2) are prohibited from participating in projects under this NOFO.

• Number of applications per entity:

  • An entity may submit more than one application, provided that each application describes a unique, scientifically distinct project.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals will be scored according to the following criteria:

1. Proving Ground Merit (45%) – Strength of the proposed proving ground: infrastructure readiness, environmental and siting considerations, stakeholder buy-in, risk mitigation, maintenance planning, and ability to support training and real-world testing.

2. Mining Technology Merit (10%) – Technical quality of initial mine technology projects: clarity of current state and advancement path, relevance to topic goals, scalability considerations, supporting data, and risk mitigation.

3. Technical Approach (30%) – Feasibility and clarity of the overall plan: logical SOPO, ability to host multiple technologies, awareness of facility limitations, alignment of budget to scope, and overall understanding of proving-ground operations.

4. Team Capabilities (15%) – Strength of the team: PI expertise, integrated workplan, prior mining facility experience, maturation planning, and knowledge of permitting, NEPA, and mining operations at scale.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

DOE anticipates awarding cooperative agreements under this NOFO, which include a statement of DOE’s “substantial involvement” in the work performed under the resulting awards. For cooperative agreements, DOE does not limit its involvement to the administrative requirements of the award. Instead, DOE has substantial involvement in the direction and redirection of the technical aspects of the project. DOE’s substantial involvement in resulting awards may include the following:

A. DOE shares responsibility with the recipient for the management, control, direction, and performance of the project.

B. DOE may intervene in the conduct or performance of work under this award for programmatic reasons. Intervention includes the interruption or modification of the conduct or performance of project activities.

C. DOE may redirect or discontinue funding the project based on the outcome of DOE’s evaluation of the project at the Go/No-Go decision point(s).

D. DOE participates in major project decision-making processes.

E. Conducting annual project review meetings and monthly status meetings to ensure adequate progress and that the work accomplishes the program and project objectives. Recommending alternate approaches or shifting work emphasis, if needed.

F. DOE may be involved with external usage of the established Proving Ground once the initial Mine Technology project(s) are completed. DOE's authorized representatives have the right to make site visits upon reasonable notice at a mutually agreeable time established by the parties to review project accomplishments and management control systems and to provide technical assistance, if required. You must provide, and must require your subawardees to provide, reasonable access to facilities, office space, resources, and assistance for the safety and convenience of the government representatives in the performance of their duties. All site visits and evaluations shall be subject to the health, safety and environmental policies required of all visitors and shall be performed in a manner that does not unduly interfere with or delay the work.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

We can find partners, manage proposal preparation between partners, and write your proposal. Flat Fee + Success Fee rate can be quoted depending on the scope of work.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

• See the solicitation here.

The AFWERX & SpaceWERX Open Topic Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Executive Summary:

AFWERX & SpaceWERX’s Open Topic provides SBIR/STTR awards to small businesses to validate feasibility (Phase I) and build prototypes with Air Force or Space Force partners (Phase II or D2P2). Any technology could potentially be funded if it provides real value to the military. Phase I awards are up to $75K/$110K for 3 months; Phase II up to $1.25M/$1.8M; Direct to Phase II up to $1.25M. The next deadlines are estimated to be Q4 of 2025 or Q1 of 2026.

How much funding would I receive?

1. Phase I (Feasibility Study): Up to $75K (SBIR) or $110K (STTR) for a 3-month effort.

2. Phase II (Prototype Development): Up to $1.25M (SBIR) or $1.8M (STTR) for up to 21 months.

3. Direct to Phase II (D2P2): Up to $1.25M (SBIR) for up to 21 months, available to companies that can skip Phase I by providing prior feasibility evidence and a signed Customer Memorandum.

What could I use the funding for?

• Phase I funds a feasibility study and/or customer discovery to identify an Air Force or Space Force end user and customer, culminating in a preliminary and final report.

• Phase II/D2P2 funds R&D to adapt and prototype your dual-use solution with an Air Force or Space Force Technical Point of Contact and the Customer/End User who signed the Customer Memorandum.

See sample projects here.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, AFWERX/SpaceWERX Open Topic participants gain several strategic advantages:

• Government Validation and Credibility: Selection for an AFWERX or SpaceWERX SBIR/STTR award demonstrates strong technical merit and alignment with Department of the Air Force priorities. This validation builds trust among primes, defense customers, and private investors.

• Enhanced Visibility and Market Recognition: Awardees are often highlighted in AFWERX communications, SpaceWERX showcases, and federal innovation reports—raising profile across defense, aerospace, and venture communities.

• Access to the National Defense Innovation Network: Recipients gain entry into the AFVentures ecosystem, connecting with Air and Space Force end users, program offices, and transition partners to accelerate dual-use commercialization and follow-on contracting opportunities.

• Stronger Commercial and Exit Potential: By advancing technology with nondilutive funding and government-backed validation, companies enhance valuation, de-risk product development, and increase attractiveness for acquisition or follow-on investment

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

The next deadlines are expected to be Q4 of 2025 and Q1 of 2026. Funding is generally received 4-5 months after the deadline.

Where does this funding come from?

Awards are made under the Department of the Air Force SBIR/STTR program via AFWERX/AFVentures and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

Who is eligible to apply?

Applicants must be U.S. small business concerns (SBCs) that:

• Are organized for profit with a U.S. place of business.

• Have ≤ 500 employees including affiliates.

• Are > 50% owned by U.S. citizens or permanent residents, qualifying U.S. entities, or combinations thereof.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals are evaluated based on three primary criteria:

• Technical Approach: The soundness, feasibility, and innovation of your proposed solution—how effectively it addresses the problem and advances the state of the art.

• Defense Need: The strength of alignment between your technology and an identified Air Force or Space Force capability gap, as demonstrated through end-user engagement or a signed Customer Memorandum.

• Commercialization Potential: The dual-use viability and market readiness of your solution—its potential to scale in both defense and commercial sectors.

Strong applications clearly articulate all three dimensions, showing technical excellence, a validated Air Force or Space Force use case, and a credible path to commercial success.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposal Template Compliance: You must use the required proposal template; any content placed outside designated pages will not be evaluated.

• U.S.-Based R/R&D Requirement: All research and development activities funded under the award must be conducted within the United States.

• ITAR Restrictions: Projects involving ITAR-controlled materials limit the participation of foreign nationals.

• Customer Memorandum Requirement: A signed Customer Memorandum is mandatory for all Phase II and Direct to Phase II (D2P2) submissions.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission will likely take 120–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for

• Phase I: $9,000 Flat Fee + a 5% Success Fee.

• Phase II/D2P2: $15,000 Flat Fee + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

Access the AFWERX Website here.

DARPA Track at Big Distances with Track-Before-Detect (TBD2)

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Strategic Technology Office (STO) is funding the Track at Big Distances with Track-Before-Detect (TBD2) program to develop advanced algorithms and payload designs for real-time space situational awareness in cislunar space. Selected teams may receive multi-million-dollar OTAs to build prototypes over a 15-month effort. Abstracts are due December 4, 2025, and companies should begin preparing materials now to meet the deadline.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA anticipates multiple OTA prototype awards ranging from approximately $500K to $5M+, depending on technical scope, cost realism, and contribution to program goals. Larger awards are possible for high-complexity payload and algorithm development efforts.

What could I use the funding for?

1.Background

The goal of the TBD2 program is to enable continuous space-based detection and tracking of objects in cislunar space on relevant timelines. This effort will increase the safety of cislunar commercial and civilian traffic contributing to the peaceful use of space for the benefit of all nations and enabling a sustainable space ecosystem. To accomplish this, TBD2 seeks to advance the state of the art for signal processing algorithms so that when combined with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) or quasi-COTS optical sensors and/or focal plane arrays (FPAs), they can a) detect and track faint objects at gigameter (Gm) distances, b) operate using available onboard processing capabilities, and c) do so on relevant timelines (within hours).

Figure 1: TBD2 seeks to extend space situational awareness beyond GEO to cislunar space

Existing space situational awareness (SSA) capabilities are primarily focused on objects in geosynchronous orbit (GEO) or closer. Extending SSA to cislunar space presents unique challenges as the distances are much greater and the volume of space needing to be scanned is ~1,200 times greater than GEO. Ground-based systems can combine large optics with complex, resource-intensive algorithms to enable cislunar detections, but are limited by their fixed location on the ground, inability to detect or track objects during hours of sunlight, and having to contend with weather and the Earth’s atmosphere. TBD2 seeks to solve this by moving the sensor to space, specifically to the Sun-Earth Lagrangian point 1 (SEL1) in order to negate any blinding of the sensor by the sun and enable a continuous view of most of cislunar space via a single sensor. To achieve this, TBD2 will require a novel approach to signal processing to detect faint objects (magnitude 23) at distances up to 2 Gigameter (Gm), while also minimizing processing time to the point that all cislunar space can be scanned within 12 hours. For a sensor at SEL1, sending image data to the ground for processing would require a continuous high-rate downlink that is impractical, if not infeasible, due to limitations in bandwidth, latency, energy budgets, and relative positions of the sensor and Earth. Therefore, TBD2 aims to develop or adapt signal processing algorithms that can be run in quasi-real time via onboard processing.

In addition to signal processing, TBD2 will also develop two distinct payload designs that optimize the combination of the signal processing with sensors/space-based compute platforms for two distinct scenarios: SEL1 and beyond GEO orbits. While SEL1 is of particular interest, alternate employment options could potentially enable a closer view of certain cislunar areas while also allowing for the detection and tracking of <1-meter objects that could endanger government, commercial or civil space operations. TBD2 will have three final deliverables:
1. The low complexity algorithm software implementation

2. Two payload designs that include the optics/sensor and compute platform combinations to be used for:

a. placement in SEL1.

b. placement in beyond GEO/cislunar orbits.

If successful, TBD2 will improve early warning capabilities for defense and civilian agencies who track potential threats and objects of interest originating from or transiting cislunar space, contributing to the safe and peaceful use of space for all nations. The fully developed signal processing algorithms capable of meeting program metrics and program goals and payload designs approved through Systems Requirements Review (SRR) constitute the Prototypes developed under the TBD2 Program.

TBD2 is a 15-month single-phase effort with two tasks.

Task 1 is to reduce the computational needs (and associated power consumption) of signal processing algorithms needed to detect faint moving objects at distances of millions of kilometers (km), and

Task 2 is to develop a payload design trade study that optimizes quasi-COTS sensors, onboard processors, and algorithms to achieve overall TBD2 goals.

1.2. Program Description/Scope
While many limitations of current approaches for cislunar SSA can be mitigated by placing sensors far from Earth (such as at SEL1), this introduces several technical challenges. Primarily, detecting and tracking faint moving resident space objects (RSOs) of 1 meter from SEL1 requires sensitivity levels capable of detecting objects as faint as 23 visual magnitude.

Achieving such sensitivity with quasi-COTS optics/sensors requires carefully optimized signal processing algorithms, which would traditionally be run via terrestrial compute platforms.

One theoretical path to achieving high sensitivity is through long integration times, stacking hundreds or thousands of image frames to boost signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but this approach introduces latency which undermines achieving detection within appropriate timelines. While current synthetic tracking and track-before-detect algorithms can theoretically reach these sensitivities, they are computationally expensive—requiring around 300 Trillion Floating-Point Operations Per Second (TFLOPs) (FP32) to operate effectively from SEL1 with limited SNR loss. Addressing this compute need without compromising performance is the main goal of the TBD2 program.

There are several algorithms, generally belonging to the Track-Before-Detect family of Algorithms (TBDAs), developed for or adapted to the detection of faint moving objects in deep space – including near-Earth asteroids, main belt asteroids, and cislunar RSOs. While some methods linearly scale with the number of frames, pixels, and motion hypotheses, alternative strategies may yield sublinear or logarithmic scaling in some dimensions. TBD2 encourages the development of such efficient architectures to enable quasi–real-time onboard detection capability while also maintaining adequate performance.

TBD2 actively encourages exploration of innovative techniques, including but not limited to:

• Coarse-to-fine search methods (e.g., motion-aware pyramidal stacking).

• Radon transforms and their efficient approximations such as the Fast discrete X-ray Transform (FaXT).

• Probabilistic voting schemes to prune velocity hypothesis space over time.

• Techniques developed in the broader Infrared Search and Track (IRST) community combined with cislunar SSA algorithms to reduce complexity, e.g., exploiting their capability of treating hypothesized trajectories stochastically and pruning them early keeping complexity bounded, and their capability to operate at low SNR.

• Multi-sensor per platform designs, as multiple telescopes lower revisit time and reduce computational needs by reducing the number of pictures, shortening integration time, and reducing the number of hypothesized velocities.

DARPA is interested in the performance of TBD2 algorithms in several areas, and the government will provide data sets to test each of these areas individually as well as together. Some of the data sets provided will be real data from an optical sensor, others will be partially synthetic (i.e., real data with fake moving objects added to the data), and others will be totally synthetic data sets.

Data sets will be provided to each performer for “practice” with their approach, while additional data sets will be used for evaluating the algorithms. In general, the number of data sets provided for "practice" will not be sufficient for training Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, so AI/ML proposers are responsible for the training of their algorithms. If requested, the government team can provide guidance to each team on how to insert their own “fake” objects for training AI models. It is expected that, over the program period of performance, thousands of data cubes will be analyzed to collect performance statistics. The government has not finalized the data format yet, and the final data format may address discussions between selected performers and the government team.

At the midpoint and conclusion of the period of performance, performer algorithms will be evaluated on a government team-hosted platform to assess accuracy of detection and tracking of dim targets of various magnitudes and required computational power for quasi real-time execution. Each performer will need to provide an executable code that will be run on a common computer they will have access to. At the midpoint and final evaluations, approaches will be evaluated according to the program metrics (Section 1.5), but additional attributes will also be considered:

• Sensitivity vs. integration time tradeoffs.

• Peak TFLOPs and memory (gigabytes) required to store and process intermediate results.

• Astrometric accuracy (comparing output to limits imposed by optics, point spread function (PSF), and photon statistics; RSO velocity estimation accuracy, etc.).

• Weight and rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost of payload and bus.

In addition to the signal processing approaches, performers will be expected to develop two distinct payload designs: one for employment at SEL1, and another for employment in a beyond GEO/cislunar orbit. While SEL1 may be a good location to perform continuous cislunar SSA of ~1m sized RSOs, it is important to also explore additional options, such as orbits beyond GEO and around EMLs (Earth-Moon Lagrangians). These orbits offer closer views of the Moon and the Earth-Moon corridor thus allowing detection and tracking of smaller objects of magnitude 23 (10-20 cm at 200,000-400,000 km), as well as covering the remaining part of cislunar space that is obstructed from SEL1.

Four possible missions for the placements of a few TBD2 sensors include:

1. Monitoring the Earth-Moon corridor

2. Monitoring lunar orbits, including EML1 and EML2

3. Monitoring medium earth orbit (MEO)/GEO orbits

4. The small part of cislunar space that has an obstructed view from SEL1

The payload designs should suggest optimal optics and sensor, algorithm, and compute platform combinations for use at SEL1 and these additional orbits. Pursuing a single payload solution (optics and sensor plus compute platform combination) for the four cislunar missions identified above is strongly encouraged. These payload designs should consider aspects such as:

• Number of telescopes, optical aperture size, and sensor parameters

• SNR detection regimes (background-limited vs. read-noise-limited)

• Platform requirements for imaging at various integration times

• Required computational needs

• Consumed power

• Estimate of payload size, mass, power requirements

• Weight, power consumption, and ROM cost of payload and bus

For the payload design, factors such as payload mass and power consumption are of critical importance. For example, multi-sensor per platform designs are of interest as multiple telescopes reduce the number of pictures and shorten integration time, thus lowering revisit time and reducing the number of hypothesized velocities. Any proposed multi-telescope options would need to quantifiably justify the performance increase at the cost of mass and volume.

The payload designs will be evaluated near the end of the 15-month period of performance via a Systems Requirements Review (SRR) with the government team. This SRR will include examination and evaluation of the functional and performance requirements designed for the individual components (signal processing, computer platform, sensor) and overall payload of the two employment scenarios. The intent is that at the conclusion of the TBD2 program, the SRR-approved payload designs can be used to proceed with the initial system design by a transition partner.

Overall, at the completion of the 15-month period of performance for TBD2, the government’s expectation is to have prototypes of the fully developed signal processing algorithms capable of meeting program metrics and program goals and payload designs that have been approved through SRRs. This will pave the way for designing and building the payload after the end of the program.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond funding, TBD2 awardees gain significant strategic and reputational advantages:

DARPA Validation and Credibility:
Selection under DARPA’s STO signals exceptional technical capability and strategic relevance in defense and space innovation—often accelerating follow-on funding, partnerships, and investor confidence.

Enhanced Market Visibility:
DARPA-funded projects receive national-level attention in defense and aerospace circles, elevating recipients’ profiles as leading-edge space technology providers.

Ecosystem Access:
Participants collaborate with top experts in signal processing, optical sensing, and SSA, building direct connections to DoD transition partners and primes seeking flight-ready technologies.

Nondilutive Growth and Exit Value:
Because TBD2 is nondilutive federal funding, awardees retain IP ownership (with limited government-use rights), strengthening their valuation and commercial leverage for future acquisitions or private investment.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Abstracts Due: December 4, 2025, 12:00 PM ET

• Oral Presentation Invitations: by government request, estimated four weeks after abstract submission.

• Awards Announced: Early 2026

• Program Start: Upon award of OTA (15-month duration)

  Funding is typically issued shortly after OTA negotiation and execution, following DARPA’s oral presentation evaluations and selections.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under its Strategic Technology Office (STO) through Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) authorized under 10 U.S.C. § 4022 for prototype projects.ds.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include:

• Large and small businesses

• Nontraditional defense contractors (per 10 U.S.C. § 3014)

• Academic and research institutions (per 15 U.S.C. § 638(e)(8))

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will prioritize teams that demonstrate:

• Proven expertise in signal processing, AI/ML, or SSA algorithms.

• Ability to run real-time detection on space-qualified compute platforms with limited power (≤600W).

• Designs that integrate quasi-COTS optics and sensors with innovative onboard processing.

• Clear performance metrics and feasible payload trade studies for SEL1 and beyond-GEO orbits.
  Collaborations between algorithm developers, optical engineers, and hardware integrators are strongly favored.

1.5. TBD2 Goals, Metrics, and Constraints

The objective of TBD2 is to enable continued space-based detection and tracking of objects in cislunar space within appropriate revisit timelines, thereby increasing the safety of cislunar commercial and civilian traffic and contributing to the peaceful use of space for all nations. The proposed concept is to place optical sensor(s) beyond GEO and use algorithms with reduced computational needs that run on available onboard processing to achieve this, and the program metrics are focused on key parameters for achieving space situational awareness. This includes metrics for detection range and sensitivity, revisit times, and onboard processing power consumption, combined with the ability to achieve positive detections while minimizing the chance of false detections.

In addition to the metrics, several constraints are provided in order to guide proposer solutions. The first constraint is that performers should assume a value of 20% albedo or less (i.e. assume no more than 20% of light is reflected from the RSO’s surface) for all potential RSOs. The second is to have performers assume that their processing time must be equal or less than the integration time when developing their payload trade studies. The third constraint limits any proposed optical aperture to a maximum diameter of 0.5 meters.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• All work must be unclassified.

• Cost-sharing may be required only for traditional defense contractors without nontraditional partners.

• Export-controlled technologies must comply with U.S. export laws (ITAR/EAR).

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive abstract will likely take 40–60 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Abstract for $4000. Assistance with Oral Presentation quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation here.

Adaptive Manufacturing and Integration at Scale (10^n)

Executive Summary:

The Department of War (using the DIU Commercial Solutions Opening process) is seeking commercial prototypes that demonstrate responsive, adaptive, and scalable production methods (e.g., digital design, AI-enabled software, 3D printing, CNC, automated molding, software-defined manufacturing) to create a resilient domestic space supply chain capable of on-demand production at unprecedented scale.
Responses are due by November 21, 2025, meaning companies should begin preparing today and seek additional help in order to meet this deadline.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding levels are not pre-set. Awards are made under Other Transaction (OT) authority, which allows the government to negotiate prototype agreements of varying scale based on project scope and relevance. Vendors selected for Phase 2 will provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate. Follow-on production contracts—potentially of significantly larger magnitude—may be awarded without further competition if the prototype is successful.

What could I use the funding for?

Background and Problem Statement: The current domestic space supply chain, is oriented towards low-volume, exquisite production of bespoke components for highly specialized spacecraft. This model involves long lead times, high costs, and minimal bench stock. Suppliers are typically small and specialized entities that produce components in units of tens, not hundreds or thousands.

This legacy approach cannot meet current demand, which is driven by a dramatic increase in heavy lift launch capacity, cadence (trending towards a launch every day),  and the need for proliferated satellite architectures. The existing exquisite supply chain will not scale without significant government investment and is unlikely to achieve the production levels needed to support the warfighter in times of conflict.

In response, the Department of War (DoW) is seeking commercial solutions to address production rate and capacity challenges in the U.S. space supply chain. This initiative aims to leverage digital design, AI-enabled software, adaptive manufacturing, and agile testing to rapidly produce dual- use space systems on demand and at commercial scale. Developing responsive, scalable and affordable  space systems is critical for maintaining U.S. technological leadership in the space domain.

The Desired Solution and Key Objectives

The DoW seeks commercial solutions to prototype and demonstrate responsive and adaptive production methods (e.g., design for manufacturing (DFM), artificial intelligence (AI), 3D printing, computer numerical control (CNC), automated molding, software-defined manufacturing) with the goal of creating a resilient, adaptive, and agile domestic space supply chain capable of on-demand production at an unprecedented scale.

Key objectives include:

• Achieve economies of scale in the U.S. space supply chain 

• Disrupt DoW’s dependence on exquisite sources of parts requiring long lead times

• Demonstrate on-demand production rates of hundreds of units per month (10²/mo) to thousands per year (≥10³/yr).

• Team commercial suppliers, advanced manufacturers, and defense integrators to address critical supply chain shortfalls as appropriate.

• Accelerate the advancement of space manufacturing readiness level (MRL).

• Employ an agile Design-Build-Test and Validate/Qualify iterative process to retain technological relevance.

Participant Roles

We will form teaming arrangements from the down-selected companies to collectively meet the needs of this AOI through an iterative process of digital design, adaptive building, operational test, and independent qualification.

Companies applying should identify with one of the following roles:

• Defense Integrators: Defense contractors with a successful history of executing DoW contracts for system-level production units (e.g., spacecraft, aerospace systems).

• Adaptive Manufacturers: Established companies experienced in scaling design-to-production throughput, including smart factories and agile supply chains.

• Disruptive Innovators: Companies of any size that have developed disruptive technologies or manufacturing capabilities that enable economies of scale (e.g., unique software, robotics, AI algorithms).

Success will be measured by the DoW’s ability to demonstrate substantial economies of scale in the mass production and integration of critical space components and systems.

Mandatory Attributes: 

• Must have an established production capability (e.g. technology, process, or facility) to meet the specified production rates (10²/mo or 10³/yr).

• Must be able to collaborate digitally throughout all prototype phases.

• Must be agile and able to source components at the speed of relevance.

• Defense Integrators must be willing to team with selected commercial companies.

Desired Attributes for Compelling Solutions:

• Ready to produce key elements of flight-ready hardware within 3 months of the award.

• Designed for autonomous operation.

• Produced domestically or via friendly foreign supply chains.

• Responsive and cost-effective at production scale.

• Solutions should be commercially viable independent of this specific government use case.

Product/Capabilities Exemplars

There are known critical space manufacturing supply chain bottlenecks and these challenges range from Tier 1 Systems, Tier 2 Sub Systems, Tier 3 Assemblies, Tier 4 Components and Parts, or Tier 5 Hardware and Materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, propulsion tanks, power supplies, star trackers, thrusters, rad-hard electronics, batteries, modems, crypto, harnesses, and/or domestic commodities production for space applications. It is anticipated that defense integrators include discussion of Tier 1 and Tier 2 supply chain bottleneck solutions while adaptive manufacturers and disruptive innovators can highlight specific Tier 3, 4, and 5 products/capabilities they consider candidates for this CSO.  Capabilities that enable scaled production rates (10²/mo or 10³/yr) are an example.  

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, participation offers major strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Selection through the DIU CSO process signals that your company’s industrialized construction approach meets urgent defense infrastructure modernization goals. That endorsement strengthens credibility with defense primes, base infrastructure offices, and private investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
Awardees gain visibility through DIU announcements, government communications, and defense industry press—establishing your firm as a recognized innovator in resilient military housing and off-site manufacturing.

Follow-On Production Opportunities:
Successful prototypes can transition directly to follow-on production agreements without further competition, potentially unlocking multi-installation, multi-year build programs.

Nondilutive Growth and Exit Value:
Winning an OT award provides nondilutive capital and validation, often leading to higher valuations and stronger acquisition potential for defense and construction-tech firms.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Phase 1 Submission Deadline: November 21, 2025 (11:59 PM ET)

• Phase 2 Pitches

• Phase 3 Full Proposals

• Awards: Prototype OT agreements are often executed within 60–90 days of selection under the above process.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided through the Department of War (DoW) under the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) using Other Transaction (OT) authority (10 U.S.C. § 4022). This allows flexible, competitive awards to commercial vendors outside of traditional Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants include:

• Defense Integrators – Established DoD contractors capable of system-level production and integration.

• Adaptive Manufacturers – Companies experienced in high-throughput, smart, or autonomous production systems.

• Disruptive Innovators – Any company (including startups and SMEs) offering breakthrough technologies that enable large-scale or cost-efficient production, such as AI-driven design or robotic manufacturing.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Defense Integrators:

• Have a track record of successful DoD system-level production (e.g., spacecraft or aerospace systems).

• Present clear plans to integrate adaptive manufacturers and innovators into their production pipelines.

• Address Tier 1 and Tier 2 bottlenecks such as propulsion systems, payload integration, or power architectures.

• Demonstrate the ability to rapidly qualify and field flight-ready units at scale.

Adaptive Manufacturers:

• Operate established or emerging smart factories capable of scaling throughput from tens to hundreds or thousands of units per year.

• Showcase agile, AI-enabled, or software-defined production methods (e.g., CNC automation, additive manufacturing, digital twins).

• Emphasize cost-efficient, domestic, and responsive production capacity.

• Target Tier 3 and Tier 4 assemblies or components where scale and speed are critical.

Disruptive Innovators:

• Bring novel technologies or processes that could redefine production economics (e.g., new materials, robotics, or design automation tools).

• Demonstrate a path to integration with larger production ecosystems via teaming with integrators or manufacturers.

• Highlight proof-of-concept or prototype performance showing transformative potential for space manufacturing readiness.

• Focus on Tier 4 and Tier 5 hardware and materials, such as rad-hard electronics, sensors, or propulsion subcomponents.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• All production must be domestic or via allied supply chains.

• Companies must comply with ITAR and DoD security requirements.

• Participants must be able to share and collaborate digitally throughout prototype phases.

• Defense integrators are required to team with selected commercial companies.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions brief will take 50-75 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Solution Brief for $5000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.

Barracks Resilience Through Industrialized Construction (BR-IC)

Executive Summary:

The Department of War, through the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), is soliciting proposals under its Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process for the Barracks Resilience Through Industrialized Construction (BR-IC) initiative. This effort seeks to prototype and scale advanced manufacturing and modular construction solutions to modernize and rebuild military barracks that are energy-efficient, durable, and rapidly deployable.
Responses are due by November 25, 2025, meaning companies should begin preparing today and seek additional help in order to meet this deadline.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding levels are not pre-set. Awards are made under Other Transaction (OT) authority, which allows the government to negotiate prototype agreements of varying scale based on project scope and relevance. Vendors selected for Phase 2 will provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate. Follow-on production contracts—potentially of significantly larger magnitude—may be awarded without further competition if the prototype is successful.

What could I use the funding for?

Problem Statement

The Department of War (DoW) faces a critical challenge in modernizing its aging infrastructure, particularly barracks, which continue to degrade due to poor environmental conditions, structural inefficiencies, and outdated building systems. Issues such as mold, pests, and inadequate HVAC performance directly affect the health, safety, and morale of service members, ultimately diminishing force readiness and retention.

Current military construction (MILCON) processes are characterized by lengthy design cycles, fragmented delivery models, and escalating costs. These legacy approaches cannot meet the speed or scalability required to align infrastructure modernization with operational tempo and strategic readiness goals.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, in announcing the formation of the Barracks Taskforce on October 7, emphasized this urgency: “How can we expect them to be ready for anything on the battlefield when their own living space is a constant source of stress and frustration?”

To address these challenges, the DoW seeks to prototype and scale advanced manufacturing and industrialized construction (IC) solutions capable of delivering high-quality, energy-efficient, and resilient facilities at accelerated timelines and reduced lifecycle costs. The objective is to establish repeatable, modular design and construction methodologies that can be rapidly deployed across installations—improving quality of life and ensuring the warfighter’s environment matches the standard of excellence expected on the battlefield.

Desired BR-IC Solution Objectives 

DIU is seeking vendor solutions from the commercial sector that directly address the challenges listed above. 

The Department is seeking a transformative approach to military construction, one that leverages controlled factory environments to shift significant portions of work off-site. This model enables automation, mechanization, and digital precision, allowing for simultaneous site preparation and module fabrication while ensuring superior consistency and quality. The result is accelerated delivery, improved cost predictability, and durable, high-performance structures that enhance warfighter readiness both domestically and abroad.

Through this effort, DIU aims to prototype IC solutions for repeatable military facility types, showcasing how commercial innovation can revolutionize defense construction. These prototypes will demonstrate how industrialized building methods can deliver faster timelines, reduced costs, and resilient, scalable infrastructure that meets the evolving demands of the DoW.

Proposed vendor solutions should address the following:

• Innovative IC building methodologies, such as volumetric modular, hybrid, and Kit of Parts

• Structure(s) that are adaptable for a variety of geographical locations, both domestic and international

• Organization of specialized roles that often are siloed in traditional construction which need to come together to effectively implement Industrialized Construction, organized into project delivery lifecycle: Design, Manufacturing, Assembly, and onsite construction

• Advanced manufacturing methodologies that can deliver high-quality barracks that ensure both performance and durability

• Faster delivery by reducing design and build timelines 30% or more compared to traditional construction. Proposed structure(s) must be capable of being designed, reviewed, and approved within a 9 to 12 month time frame

• Greater cost predictability by reducing design and construction costs by 20% or more as compared to traditional construction

• A comprehensive prototype that encompasses BR-IC design, manufacturing, and building methodologies while employing advanced manufacturing techniques

• Adaptable designs for barracks.

• Process Efficiency: Describe in as much detail as possible, the vendor’s unique BR-IC process, through design and prototyping, as well as estimates for increased efficiencies in terms of scale, cost, and deliverability

• High Performance Sustainable Buildings: Buildings must be energy resilient high performance sustainable buildings and validated by a third-party certification

Complementary Capabilities

In addition, the DoW is interested in the following optional complementary capabilities:

• Utilities: Vendors may propose solutions that consider Enhanced Use Leases, Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA), Energy Resilience Contracts and/or Power Purchase Agreements 

• Finance: Vendors may propose private capital investment, with little or no government upfront capital investment. For example, proposals may leverage third party/private financing, either independently or through a public private partnership

• Owned, Operations and Maintenance Services: Vendors may propose post-construction building operations and maintenance services

Vendors are requested to provide BR-IC design, manufacturing, and construction solution briefs that include the following; 

• Effective cost and schedule control in all phases (design, manufacturing, construction, integration, performance and servicing) 

• Provide design construction process improvements

• Demonstrate the use of technology/AI to provide a scalable, faster, and reliable aid to design efforts

• Ensure design for manufacturing and assembly 

DoD building standards are typically established by the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and DoD Unified Facility Criteria (UFC). Vendors are free to propose alternative means of ensuring building longevity, life/safety requirements, and force protection standards are met.

Vendor Solution Brief Submission Options

Vendors have flexibility in how they submit their solution briefs, which can be proposed either independently or through a teaming arrangement:

1. Teaming: Vendors (e.g., Design/Build Firms, Design/Build Joint Ventures) are permitted to submit proposals as part of a team.

2. Scope of Objectives: Vendor or vendor teams may submit a solution brief that addresses one, multiple, or all of the BR-IC objectives.

3. Complementary Capabilities: Vendor or vendor teams may also submit a solution brief that focuses exclusively on one or more of the complementary capabilities.

Expectations 

The successful vendor(s),or team will work collaboratively with DoW personnel to meet the following expectations: 

• Design, manufacture, construct, and commission BR-IC 

• Develop detailed project requirements to meet objectives 

• Submit detailed proposal(s) for completing the design, manufacturing and construction for barracks

• Develop and negotiate design, manufacturing and construction agreements 

• Perform quality control and collaborate with DoW quality management personnel

  • Functions of quality control will be the responsibility of the vendor

  • Functions of quality assurance will reside with the DoW

• Vendor(s) must have the ability to conduct the projects at DoW installations in CONUS and/or OCONUS

Desired solutions should demonstrate relevant and verified experience, as well as descriptions of past examples of designing and constructing BR-IC commercial buildings that are energy efficient with reduced life cycle costs.

Vendors or vendor teams are to provide examples and descriptions of designing and building three completed IC projects within the past 10 years with each project value exceeding $20,000,000. Past building projects must include achievement of sustainable third-party certification. 

The selected vendors/teams will initially demonstrate these approaches by designing, constructing, and commissioning new building(s); some examples include: 

(a) AND/OR ~100,000 SF for ~160 rooms (~300 personnel) multi-story Barracks

(b) AND/OR ~440,000 SF for a 600 room (1200 personnel) multi-story Student Housing

(c) AND/OR ~100,000 SF for 200 rooms (200 personnel) multi-story Unaccompanied Personnel dormitory 

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct funding, BR-IC participation offers major strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Selection through the DIU CSO process signals that your company’s industrialized construction approach meets urgent defense infrastructure modernization goals. That endorsement strengthens credibility with defense primes, base infrastructure offices, and private investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
Awardees gain visibility through DIU announcements, government communications, and defense industry press—establishing your firm as a recognized innovator in resilient military housing and off-site manufacturing.

Follow-On Production Opportunities:
Successful prototypes can transition directly to follow-on production agreements without further competition, potentially unlocking multi-installation, multi-year build programs.

Nondilutive Growth and Exit Value:
Winning an OT award provides nondilutive capital and validation, often leading to higher valuations and stronger acquisition potential for defense and construction-tech firms.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Phase 1 Submission Deadline: November 21, 2025 (11:59 PM ET)

• Phase 2 Pitches

• Phase 3 Full Proposals

• Awards: Prototype OT agreements are often executed within 60–90 days of selection under the above proce

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided through the Department of War (DoW) under the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) using Other Transaction (OT) authority (10 U.S.C. § 4022). This allows flexible, competitive awards to commercial vendors outside of traditional Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).

Who is eligible to apply?

This opportunity is open to both U.S. and international vendors across allied nations. To receive an OT award, companies must satisfy 10 U.S.C. § 4022(d) by demonstrating at least one of the following:

• Significant participation from a nontraditional defense contractor.

• All participants are small businesses.

• At least one-third of project cost is funded with non-Federal sources.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

1. Teams with verified IC delivery experience: three completed IC projects in the last 10 years, each >$20M, with sustainability certification.

2. Solutions demonstrating repeatable, modular IC methodologies that:

   • Cut design/build timelines by ≥30% (capable of 9–12 month design/review/approval),

   • Improve cost predictability by ≥20%, and

   • Deliver durable, energy-resilient, high-performance facilities across CONUS/OCONUS.

3. Organizations showing integrated capability across Design → Manufacturing → Assembly → On-site construction, strong quality control, and scalable delivery.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Companies must be registered in SAM.gov prior to award.

• Proposals must comply with CSO HQ0845-20-S-C001 evaluation criteria.

• Vendors must meet DoD building standards (Whole Building Design Guide and Unified Facility Criteria) or propose equivalent alternatives ensuring durability and force protection.

• Projects will be conducted at DoW installations in CONUS and/or OCONUS locations.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive solutions brief will take 50-75 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the Solution Brief for $5000. Pitch & Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Solicitation Here.

USSOCOM BAA for Extramural Biomedical and Human Performance Research and Development

Executive Summary:

United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) is awarding $2,000,000 to $10,000,000 for projects across defined Research Areas of Interest (RAIs) to advance biomedical, human performance, and canine medicine relevant to Special Operations Forces. This BAA is open continuously through 31 July 2028; applicants must first submit a pre-proposal via eBRAP and, if invited, a full application (generally within 60 days of invitation).

How much funding would I receive?

1. Typical project size: $2 Million to $10 Million

2. Program capacity: “Anticipated total costs… will not exceed $20 Million annually” across all awards funded under this BAA.

What could I use the funding for?

A primary emphasis of the USSOCOM Biomedical, Human Performance, and Canine Research Program is to identify and develop techniques, knowledge products, and materiel (medical devices, drugs, and biologics) to support far-forward early intervention of life-threatening illnesses or injuries within an Irregular Warfare or asymmetric, multi-domain operational environment. Special Operations Forces (SOF) medical personnel place a premium on medical equipment that is small, lightweight, ruggedized, modular, multi-use, and designed for operation in extreme environments. The equipment must be simple to employ, require minimum maintenance, and have low power consumption. Drugs and biologics should optimally not require refrigeration or other special handling. All materiel solutions must be capable of commercialization. Research projects may apply existing scientific and technical knowledge for which concept and/or patient care efficacy have already been demonstrated to meet SOF requirements. The proposed research must be relevant to active-duty service members, veterans, military beneficiaries, and/or the American public. Relevant research must be responsive to the health care needs of the U.S. Armed Forces, family members of the U. S. Armed Forces, and U.S. Veterans.

Proposals must address a relevant health problem responsive to one of the Research Areas of Interest below (Clinical trials are normally not funded by this BAA):

• Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR)

  SOF medical personnel require capabilities for far-forward medical care to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with critical wounds and injuries. The proposed research, application, and/or development of medical techniques and materiel (medical devices, drugs, and biologics) for optimal triage and early intervention in critical life-threatening injuries when casualty evacuation is not possible or is delayed. The project areas under DCR to which the USSOCOM will give highest consideration are:

  • Global Treatment Strategies and Next Generation Wound Management:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop effective treatment strategies that address the following elements: resuscitation, optimal resuscitation fluid(s), uncomplicated shock, noncompressible hemorrhaging, traumatic brain injuries, and austere damage control surgery. These strategies must be optimized for medics in austere, far-forward areas, with minimal logistical or specialty support, who must stabilize and treat patients for extended periods (days, not hours). Projects that research and develop an all-in-one traumatic wound care treatment that can achieve hemostasis, and incorporate analgesia are preferred.

  • Analgesia:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel, safe, efficacious, peripherally, and centrally acting analgesia that provide easy administration in the field, tolerance of extreme environments, and effectiveness at the point of injury for a prolonged period of field care (days, not hours) and does not sensitize the patient to topical analgesia. Maximum analgesia with minimal sedation is preferred.

  • Far Forward Blood, Blood Components, Blood Substitute, & Injectable Hemostatics:
    The proposed project must research novel strategies to increase the ease, efficacy, and safety of blood transfusions (i.e., person to person, pre-hospital blood banking, rolling blood banks, and blood substitutes) forward of normal logistics support; (e.g., evaluating blood for type/cross matching and for the presence and/or reduction of pathogens, leucocytes, and AB antibodies to improve safety of whole blood transfusion at the point of injury). Projects that will be considered also include injectable medications to address the coagulopathy of trauma and novel strategies to improve tissue oxygenation.

  • Austere Surgical Stabilization:
    Future theatres where SOF personnel will operate are likely to be much less medically robust than the past decade of fighting in our current theatres (this can translate to remote civilian areas), and there will be a mismatch between capability and need. Rather than sitting at hardened structures waiting on patients, surgical personnel may be increasingly asked to go to the patient. Research should focus on mobility/portability of medical and surgical equipment, including support equipment such as sterilization, with emphasis on equipment with greater capabilities than currently fielded devices, smaller size and weight, low power demands, and flexibility in power supplies. Additionally, research and development efforts should include telehealth technologies linking forward surgical providers with higher medical authority consultation and effective, relevant, and dynamic surgical training capabilities. Lastly, research into future procedures and devices may also include a human systems approach to define limitations and mitigation strategies of surgical capability in austere environments (i.e., low light, temperature variability, improving surgical access in distributed maritime environment, surgery in flight, etc.) to bridge time to surgery when patient load exceeds surgical capability.

• Prolonged Field Care (PFC)

  SOF medical personnel require capabilities for far-forward medical care to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with critical wounds, injuries, diseases, and associated sepsis. PFC should focus on novel treatments that support the ability to manage 3-5 patients across the spectrum of illness to multi-system injury for a minimum of 5-7 days. SOF medical personnel require capability to expedite evacuation and increase survivability with limited site of injury support in austere environments including: hyperbaric, mountainous, high-altitude, arctic, and distributed maritime operations.

• Medical Sensors and Devices

  The primary emphasis is to research, apply and/or develop field-sustainable, rapidly deployable medical sensors and/or devices for extended care beyond initial trauma resuscitation, to include austere/forward surgery while operating in areas where casualty evacuation is delayed or unavailable. In addition, proposals that investigate or develop wireless biosensors should demonstrate physiological monitoring capabilities to include, but not limited to, heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiration rate, capnography, core temperature, heart rate variability and compensatory reserve index (CRI). Research and development of devices and sensors should include or plan for the capability to transmit (Bluetooth 4.2) to Android handheld devices and be designed with an open architecture to allow for sensors to be incorporated into a family of sensors that may or may not report to a central handheld device. (NOTE: Ideally, sensor and equipment technologies should be electronically readable, scannable, or transmittable to the Battlefield Assisted Trauma Distributed Observation Kit (BATDOK), an Android-driven, multi-patient, point of injury casualty monitoring capability being fielded by U.S. Air Force (USAF) Pararescuemen and other SOF Medics. Novel devices are required which aid in measuring physiologic decompensation and/or adequacy of treatment/resuscitation in the field environment and/or provide a trigger for a pre-hospital medical intervention (i.e., validation of tissue (muscle) oxygen saturation (StO2), CRI, traumatic brain injury (TBI) measures, etc.

• Portable Lab Assays and Diagnostics

  The proposed project must research, apply and/or develop novel concepts for portable and environmentally stable far forward laboratory assays and diagnostics. Equipment should be extremely portable, ruggedized, use limited or no external power, and any reagents should be self- contained and stable in extreme environmental conditions. Preference will be given to proposals that are field oriented, rugged, low weight/cube space and have little to no refrigeration requirements. Additionally, novel wireless, transmittable or scannable solutions such as patches, scanner/readers or other noninvasive technologies are encouraged.

• Force Health Protection and Environmental Medicine

  SOF personnel must often operate for extended periods of time in austere environments that expose them to extremes in altitude, temperature, humidity, wind, kinetosis, infectious diseases, toxic industrial chemicals, toxic industrial materials, and environmental hazards (including envenomation). In addition, the environment may be compromised due to chemical, biological, and radiological contamination. The primary emphasis of this research area is to research, apply, and develop techniques, therapeutic measures, and materiel (personal protective equipment (PPE), medical devices, drugs, and biologics) to ensure sustained human performance and effectiveness while operating in harsh environmental conditions and/or wearing appropriate PPE.

  • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) Rapid Diagnostics, Treatment, and Prophylaxis:
    The proposed projects must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches that will diagnose, treat, and protect SOF personnel from exposure to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high yield explosives in near real time.

  • Occupational and Environmental Health (OEH) Hazards:
    The proposed project must focus on development of novel methods and devices for rapid identification and analysis of exposures to OEH hazards. Research must support the development and analysis of handheld, field hardened, and environmentally stable analytical devices, monitoring devices, dosimetry, assays for rapid on-site identification, and real-time analysis of OEH hazards in air, water, and soil that could pose an acute or chronic health hazard to SOF personnel. Such OEH hazards include toxic industrial chemicals/toxic industrial materials (TICs/TIMs), lead exposures, food and water borne pathogens, toxins, biological agents, and radiological material exposures.

  • Operational Exposure Monitoring:
    The proposed project must seek to develop wireless biosensors for monitoring SOF personnel in extreme environments (i.e., high altitude, whether in-flight or the environment itself, excessive heat or cold, etc.), and potentially hazardous material exposure. Sensors should address physiological measurements and/or chemical, biological and/or radiological hazards. For hazards monitoring, a personal dosimetry device is desired that can detect and alarm based on radiation and chemical presence. The alarming function can be pre-determined to account for known environmental conditions (i.e., natural occurring radiation levels that are below threshold/detrimental health levels) and parts per million (PPM) counts that would trigger an alert. This detection device needs to be able to alarm differently to identify the "type" of hazard(s), and to trigger a back-off and/or donning of additional PPE. Monitoring should be capable of wirelessly communicating via Bluetooth 4.2 to Android handheld devices, tablets, or compatible wrist-mounted displays.

• Brain Health

  Brain Health research efforts include, but are not limited to: determining if repeated low-level blast exposure (rLLBE) causes brain injury or repeated blast brain injury (rBBI), development and validation of fieldable Neurocognitive Assessment Tools (NCATs) and baseline testing, Comprehensive Symptom History (CASH) collection, blast exposure and impact monitoring, determination of safe acceptable limits for blast exposure, development and validation of capabilities to easily identify/diagnose rBBI, methods to prevent, screen for, monitor, and correct neuroendocrine dysfunction. Additionally, Brain Health research efforts include, but are not limited to: methods to prevent TBI from impact and blast such as redesign of helmets, body armor, and munitions, development of pharmaceuticals to prevent and/or treat brain injury, validation of brain injury prevention strategies, and development of return to duty decision support tools.

  • Environmental Exposures Protection:
    Research that develops novel material and/or approaches to protect SOF personnel from the neurological effects of single and repetitive auditory (impulse noise) and non-auditory (overpressure) blast exposures and other environmental factors determined to affect nervous system function.

  • Environmental Exposure Effects:
    Research that determines the neurocognitive, nervous system, and auditory effects from single and repeated low- and high-level blast exposures, impulse noise, and other potential hazardous environmental factors.

  • Biomarkers:
    Research to determine which biomarkers are indicative of rBBI; sequelae from rBBI causing further injury; recovery status; and recovery rate from rBBI. Testing and validating diagnostic biomarkers for rBBI. Proposals should also consider incorporation of validated biomarkers onto existing or future diagnostic platforms. Use of machine learning and/or model development to interpret and report biomarkers that are indicative of rBBI are of interest.

  • Neuropsychological Testing:
    Research to validate neurocognitive assessment tools (NCATs) to determine baseline neurocognitive status, readiness, neurocognitive degradation, sensitivity to various exposures, TBI and recovery status post injury. Proposals to improve the speed, accuracy, specificity, and proximity to injury for the use of NCATs, as well as to compare new technologies and/or modalities (including passive assessment of cognition) to existing NCATs.

  • Olfactory, Oculomotor, Auditory, Vestibular, Cranial Nerve, and Vocal-Acoustic Performance:
    Research and proposals to perform and validate oculomotor, auditory, vestibular, cranial nerve, and vocal acoustic assessments. Research and proposals to assess the effect of nervous system injury to oculomotor, auditory, vestibular, cranial nerve, and vocal-acoustic performance and strategies to restore their performance after injury and prevent injury or further decline.

  • Postural Stability:
    Research to assess the effects of blast exposure on postural stability including the proprioceptive component. Novel treatment strategies, therapies, and therapeutics to prevent and/or correct detriment to postural stability from TBI and neurotrauma caused by blast, impact, and/or other environmental exposures.

  • Neuroendocrine Dysfunction:
    Methods to prevent, screen for, monitor, and correct neuroendocrine dysfunction.

  • Neuroimaging:
    Research into novel imaging and imaging interpretation techniques including, but not limited to computed axial tomography (CAT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, to diagnose brain tissue pathologies including, but not limited to, axonal injury, myelin injury, and interface astroglial scarring without the need for immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, or histopathology testing.

  • Analytics:
    Research into analysis including machine learning, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence enabled analysis of data including, but not limited to, NCATs; environmental exposures likely to affect brain health; blast, impact, and noise exposures; auditory, vestibular, and vocal acoustic assessments; postural stability assessments; and neuroimaging.

  • Neuromodulation:
    Research into the use of neuromodulation techniques for treating TBI, neurotrauma, pain, restoring and improving function, improving behavioral health, and cognitive performance.

  • Brain Lymphatics and Glymphatics:
    Research into measuring the fluid dynamics of the brain lymphatic system, diagnosing dysfunction, and validation for tools or techniques to improve brain lymphatic clearance.

  • Pupillometry, Pupillary Response, and Microsaccades:
    Research into field capable pupillary response measurement capture and analysis, with or without the ability to capture Microsaccades to assess central nervous system loading and/or damage.

• Automation of Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis

  Research into Automation of Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) or a similar method

• Human Performance

  USSOCOM requires SOF personnel to withstand extraordinary physical demands and psychological stress to complete their missions. The optimization of SOF personnel’s ability to perform at very high levels for long durations, in addition to processing information and making critical decisions in a timely manner, while operating in extreme environments, will significantly improve their overall operational effectiveness. This research area explores alternatives and/or new approaches to sustain and optimize SOF human performance both to increase mission capability and to extend the career longevity of SOF personnel.

  • Improved Sleep:
    The proposed project must research, apply and/or develop novel approaches to achieve the restorative effects of sleep. This may include methods to induce, maintain, or improve the quality of sleep throughout the entire night. Additionally, the ability to accelerate the effects of sleep through methods requiring less time (e.g., the effects of sleeping eight hours are realized in four hours’ time) or enabling the SOF personnel to quickly reach and adequately cycle through the stages of sleep where the highest restorative effects occur (i.e., Stage 3/ deep sleep, and Stage 4/rapid eye movement sleep).

  • Optimal Acclimatization Strategies:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches and/or technologies that provide rapid and sustainable human acclimatization in austere environments, to include fatigue countermeasure, extremes in temperature, extremes in altitude, and time-zone change (i.e., circadian acclimatization).

  • Wearables:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches and/or wearable technologies, and/or leverage commercial-off-the-shelf wearable technologies that will monitor physiological measures of human performance to include, but not limited to, caloric expenditure, heart rate/heart rate response, heart rate variability, body fat percentage, sleep hygiene (deep and REM sleep duration) in real-time. Measures should be accurate with low fixed bias, wirelessly communicated via Bluetooth, Near Field Magnetic Induction or Radio Frequency technology in real-time and provide the command the capability to utilize the data for analysis of individuals and/or team performance via the USSOCOM Human Performance Data Management System. The device should be able to be turned on/off and/or have an inactive mode, provide real-time feedback on a display screen, be capable of displaying time, and be adjustable to fit users of different statures. Of parallel interest to address is a proposed project to track sleep, fatigue, and performance degradations through a wearable device that provides quantitative data (rather than qualitative surveys often seen in Fatigue Studies), that in turn will be gathered and amalgamated from entire units, in order to track individual performance, unit performance, mission impacts to performance levels, length of time for acclimatization (if it is ever achieved), and potential risk of mishaps.

  • Diagnostics for Performance Sustainment:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop minimally invasive diagnostic devices to provide actionable information on nutritional gaps, hormonal response to training, physiological response to performance interventions and recovery, and epigenetic predictors of potential injury.

  • Performance Nutrition:
    The proposed projects must research, apply and/or develop methods to accurately measure nutritional status of SOF personnel. The proposed project should focus on cost effectiveness, accuracy, and end-user compatibility (i.e., user friendly) methods or devices for identifying and optimizing an individual’s nutrient status. Consideration of alternative fuel (energy) sources, dietary supplementation, biomarkers, and nutrient volume/timing are specific areas of interest.

  • Physiological Performance:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches and/or technologies to maximize the physiological performance of SOF personnel in austere and/or training environments, to include increased endurance, enhanced senses, tolerance to environmental extremes, and enhanced overall fitness, to maintain operational posture/ability in high stress scenarios without noticeable augmentation, and without hampering personnel mobility.

  • Cognitive Performance:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches and/or technology that provide greater mental acuity or neuroenhancement (i.e., targeted enhancement and extension of cognitive and affective abilities). Encompasses pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of improving cognitive, affective, motor functionality and performance, to include neuromodulation.

  • Psychological Performance and Suicide Prevention:
    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches to the assessment and improvement of behavioral health within the force. Examples include but are not limited to, novel approaches to treatment and rehabilitation from acute and/or chronic post-traumatic stress, depression, and anxiety, improved emotional and nervous system self-regulation, digital/virtual engagement strategies, methods to measure behavioral health performance over time, and improved suicide prevention tools/strategies.

• Canine Medicine and Performance

  SOF personnel rely on canines’ exceptional capabilities as combat multipliers. This research area explores alternatives and/or new approaches to preserve and enhance SOF canine combat performance. SOF medical personnel place a premium on canine-specific approaches that are effective in extreme environments and do not require significant additional logistical support (i.e., maximize use of available SOF Medic materiel). The eight “Canine Medicine and Performance” project areas, to which SOF will give consideration, in priority order, are:

  • Trauma Resuscitation:

    The proposed project must support development of innovative techniques/strategies for canine trauma resuscitation (e.g., hypotensive resuscitation, whole blood/blood component replacement, and non-compressible hemorrhaging), particularly to address ballistic projectile injuries, in diverse/austere environments that lack immediately available medical evacuation or restorative surgical capacity.

    Note: Research should minimize or refrain from utilizing canine specific equipment or devices; this will allow treatment from existing trauma kits fielded by SOF Medics.

  • Non-Traditional Anesthesia Protocols:

    The proposed project must develop novel approaches for routine and emergency/post- traumatic canine field sedation and/or anesthesia in diverse environments and, utilizing pharmaceuticals available to SOF Medics.

  • Canine Performance:

    The proposed project must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches and/or technologies that address optimization of canine performance through improved physical conditioning programs, reduction of cognitive decline, enhanced nutrition, and genetics research.

  • Sensory Optimization and Protection:

    Research must be oriented toward innovative methods that enhance or conserve SOF canine olfactory, visual, and/or auditory performance during combat operations.

  • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) Canine Decontamination, Treatment, and PPE Against Possible Exposure:

    The proposed projects must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches that will diagnose, treat, decontaminate, and protect canines from exposure to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high yield explosives.

  • Environmental Extremes:

    Project proposals must research, apply, and/or develop novel strategies that address acclimatization to acute extremes in temperature, altitude, and/or time zone change (circadian acclimatization), and/or prolonged marine environmental exposure in SOF canines.

  • Brain Health and TBI

    Brain health research efforts include but are not limited to development and validation of NCATs, blast exposure and impact monitoring, determination of safe acceptable limits for blast exposure, validation of neurocognitive baseline testing, capabilities to easily determine mild, moderate, and severe TBI, pharmaceuticals to prevent or treat brain injury, validation of brain injury treatment strategies, and procedures to determine safe return to duty decisions for SOF canines.

  • Pre- and Post-Trauma Training / Behavioral Issues:

    The proposed project must address unique approaches to diagnosing and treating SOF-peculiar training and post-traumatic canine behavioral issues, to optimize pre-purchase selection and post-purchase training strategies across the enterprise and restore performance in canines with behavioral and/or post-trauma issues.

• Medical Sustainment

  SOF medical personnel require sustainment capabilities to support far-forward medical requirements to reduce the patient and supply risk associated with operational medicine. The proposed research, application, and/or development of medical sustainment techniques and materiel must address unique approaches to optimizing supply management and safeguarding equipment requirements. The project areas under “Medical Sustainment” to which the USSOCOM will give highest consideration are:

  • Power and Energy

    Project proposals must research, apply, and/or develop novel strategies that conserve or optimize medical equipment in-field use to reduce sustainment burden in prolonged, austere environments.

  • Austere Medical Logistics Procurement

    SOF personnel, operating in austere environments, may not have the ability to receive conventional resupply efforts. Project proposals must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches to assist SOF personnel in developing and receiving medical resupplies or repair parts to meet their needs while in the field. These efforts must meet shipping and handling considerations (i.e. temperature control) for a wide range of medical products from batteries to blood. Efforts may include, but are not limited to, fabrication, improvisation, and/or delivery methods from sea, ground, air, or suborbital domains.

  • Equipment Protection

    Research that develops novel material and/or approaches to protect SOF medical equipment from environmental (i.e. CBRNE, freezing temperatures, etc.) and/or adversarial effects (i.e. jamming, electromagnetic pulse weapons, etc.).

  • Supply Monitoring Capability

    Project proposals must research, apply, and/or develop novel approaches to rapidly forecasting and calculating supply requirements based on patient treatment requirements, shelf-life, and storage considerations.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, participation under the USSOCOM Biomedical and Human Performance BAA offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Being selected for funding by USSOCOM demonstrates exceptional technical capability and mission relevance to U.S. Special Operations Forces. This validation enhances your organization’s credibility with DoD program managers, defense primes, and dual-use technology investors seeking field-proven innovation.

Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
Awardees often gain visibility through federal award announcements, DoD communications, and defense medical research forums—positioning your company as a recognized contributor to national security and elite force readiness.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Projects funded under this BAA operate within the broader military biomedical and human performance ecosystem, connecting recipients with military laboratories, medical R&D commands, and operational units. This access frequently leads to additional collaboration, follow-on funding, and contracting opportunities.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Advancing your technology with nondilutive government support and demonstrating validation in demanding SOF environments can significantly increase company valuation and strategic attractiveness for acquisition or investment by defense, medical, and performance technology leaders.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• Open period: Continuously open through 31 July 2028.

• Two-step submission: Pre-proposal via eBRAP; if invited, submit the full application (generally within 60 days).

• Review & notice: Applicants should receive disposition within ~180 days of submission; awards may be made any time throughout the year and are contingent on funding and successful negotiations.

• Regulatory lead times: Allow 2–3 months for DoD human-subjects review (OHRO/HRPO) and 1–2 months for animal research review (VRO), as applicable.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is provided by the Department of Defense (USSOCOM) and administered by the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA); the program leverages CDMRP/eBRAP systems. Any funds received by USSOCOM appropriate to the BAA’s research areas may be used, up to a program total of $20M annually.

Who is eligible to apply?

Organizations only: national/international, for-profit, non-profit, public, and private. FFRDCs are not eligible for direct awards but may team under their sponsoring agreements. Eligible investigators are individuals employed by/affiliated with eligible organizations. No cost sharing is required.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Winning projects consistently score high on USSOCOM’s evaluation factors, which include:

• Technical Merit and Scientific Rigor: The proposed approach must be well-founded, methodologically sound, and clearly linked to measurable outcomes.

• Innovation and Impact: Reviewers favor projects that introduce novel methods, materials, or technologies capable of significantly improving SOF medical or performance capabilities. Incremental improvements without clear operational relevance tend to score poorly.

• SOF Relevance: Proposals must explicitly tie their work to unique SOF operational needs—such as portability, durability, limited logistics support, or extreme-environment applicability.

• Feasible Study Design and Realistic Execution Plan: Reviewers expect achievable milestones, well-defined deliverables, and credible transition pathways for eventual use by operational forces or integration into DoD systems.

• Qualified Team and Institutional Capability: Teams with demonstrated expertise in biomedical R&D, human performance, or defense health technology—and with access to appropriate facilities and regulatory infrastructure—are prioritized.

• Appropriate and Realistic Budget: Budgets should align with the scope and complexity of work, typically falling between $2 million and $10 million total costs for projects up to five years in duration.

Companies that combine strong technical innovation, credible execution capability, and a direct line of sight to SOF mission impact are most likely to be selected for funding.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Project length: Up to 5 years.

• Pre-proposal required; unsolicited full proposals without invitation are rejected.

• Clinical trials are typically not associated with this BAA.

• Human/animal research approvals required.

• Administrative pitfalls leading to rejection/withdrawal include: missing/over-limit narratives, missing budget, inclusion of URLs in prohibited sections, and inconsistencies between pre-proposal and full application.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive pre-proposal will likely take 120–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the pre-proposal for $7000. Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Funding Announcement: HT9425-23-S-SOC1 BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT (BAA) for Extramural Biomedical and Human Performance Research and Development Department of Defense

ARPA-H Resilient Systems Office (RSO) BAA

Executive Summary:

ARPA-H’s Resilient Systems Office (RSO) is accepting innovative Solution Summaries and full proposals—on a rolling basis—aimed at strengthening the adaptability, reliability, and interoperability of the U.S. health ecosystem. Multiple awards are anticipated under flexible Other Transaction (OT) agreements. The ISO is open now and remains open until March 5, 2029.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify dollar amounts or funding ceilings. Awards are made as Other Transaction (OT) agreements at the government’s discretion, with specific payment structures negotiated individually. As a rule of thumb, companies should request only what they need to reach a meaningful technical or commercialization milestone—a concrete point that clearly demonstrates feasibility, enables transition, or unlocks follow-on investment.

What could I use the funding for?

The Resilient Systems Office (RSO), one of ARPA-H’s mission offices, seeks project proposals that drive innovations to enhance the adaptability, reliability, and interoperability of the health ecosystem. Submissions should aim for groundbreaking ideas that solve systemic challenges across the health landscape, leveraging cutting-edge technologies that address long-standing gaps in the quality, consistency, personalization, and efficacy of care.

RSO is interested in innovations that take a systems level approach in areas including, but not limited to, systems biology, data systems, biophysical systems, health IT systems, sociotechnical systems, health-related systems engineering, and other systems with the potential to improve health outcomes. While RSO welcomes “out of the box” ideas to address the above gaps, the mission office encourages proposals that address the following areas:

• Fortifying systems to improve robustness:

  Novel system designs and modular capabilities that extend the shelf-life of systems, ensuring peak performance across a broad range of healthcare environments and use cases. Applications of interest include, but are not limited to, the adaptability and robustness of biological systems; digital platforms for secure and efficient management of information; and socio-technical systems to maintain access to care and critical information.

• Removing barriers to enhance system efficiency and efficacy:

  Approaches that provide paradigm shifts in system dynamics to improve health outcomes. This includes improvements to system interoperability, process, and transparency; foundational capabilities to enable integration of emerging technology solutions; overcoming systemic barriers driven by misaligned incentives; user-centric tools that improve patient care coordination and user experience; and clinical and research solutions to boost efficiency, reduce cognitive load, and accelerate scientific discovery and its application.

• Early detection and interventions to mitigate disruptions to the healthcare ecosystem:

  Agile interventions to reduce the impact of disruptions and enhance readiness to manage and recover from large-scale health events. This spans the entire health system, including supply chains, manufacturing, and logistics.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are significant indirect benefits to receiving an ARPA-H Resilient Systems Office (RSO) agreement:

• Government Validation and Credibility:
  Being selected by ARPA-H—the nation’s newest high-impact biomedical research agency—signals exceptional scientific credibility and alignment with the federal government’s most forward-leaning health innovation priorities. This “ARPA-H validation” often accelerates partnerships with major healthcare systems, research institutions, and investors who recognize the rigor and selectivity of government-vetted innovation.

• Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
  Award recipients are frequently featured in ARPA-H announcements, federal health innovation communications, and national press coverage. This visibility positions your company as a recognized leader in translational health technology and attracts new collaborators, talent, and private-sector investment.

• Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
  ARPA-H performers gain access to a broad innovation ecosystem spanning federal health agencies, academic research centers, and industry partners. These relationships foster collaboration, facilitate regulatory readiness, and open pathways to follow-on contracts, pilot deployments, and commercialization opportunities within the U.S. health system.

• Nondilutive Growth and Strategic Leverage:
  Because funding is nondilutive, companies can scale and validate core technologies without giving up equity. This validation and maturity achieved under government sponsorship often lead to higher valuations and greater leverage in future fundraising or acquisition discussions.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Open period: now through March 5, 2029.

• Step 1 (required): Submit a Solution Summary via the ARPA-H Solution Submission Portal. ARPA-H strives to provide written feedback within 30 business days of submission.

• Step 2: If encouraged, you’ll generally have 45 calendar days from feedback to submit a full proposal (unless ARPA-H specifies otherwise).

• Review cadence: ARPA-H reviews proposals on a rolling basis and strives to issue a decision within 60 calendar days of receiving a full proposal.

• Award timing: After selection, final negotiations for an Other Transaction (OT) award are completed rapidly, and invoicing is handled through Payment Management Services.

Because of this streamlined process, most ARPA-H applicants move from initial Solution Summary to award decision in approximately 4–5 months—making ARPA-H one of the fastest federal funders for high-impact health innovation projects.

Where does this funding come from?

The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a federal R&D agency within HHS, issuing awards under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 290c(g)(1)(D) via OT agreements.

Who is eligible to apply?

Academia, non-profit organizations, for-profit entities, hospitals, community health centers, and non-federal research centers. Non-U.S. entities may participate if compliant with all applicable laws.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Reviewers assess (in descending importance):

1. Scientific/technical merit—innovative, complete plans with clear deliverables, risks, and mitigations;

2. Contribution & relevance to ARPA-H’s mission—transformative potential, unmet need, commercialization/transition thinking, and IP/software approaches that enable adoption (preference for open standards/OSS where appropriate);

3. Team capabilities/experience—track record delivering similar efforts on budget/schedule;

4. Cost/budget alignment with the technical approach. ARPA-H encourages proposing the best technical solution over low-risk/minimal-uncertainty concepts.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Standards & IP: strong preference for open, consensus-based standards (e.g., FHIR/TEFCA, DICOM) and commercial-friendly open-source licenses when feasible; proposals must justify any deviations/standard extensions and may need a pre-submission meeting for exceptions. Provide good-faith IP rights representations; pre-publication review may be required when sensitive info could be disclosed.

• Compliance: Human Subjects (IRB), Animal Subjects (IACUC), NIH Genomic Data Sharing (if applicable), CUI handling, research security disclosures (including CHIPS/NPSM-33 requirements), and OCI disclosures/mitigation.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive full proposal under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

ARPA-H Proactive Health Office (PHO) BAA

Executive Summary:

ARPA-H’s Proactive Health Office (PHO) has an open Innovative Solutions Opening (ISO) to fund high-impact R&D that improves health span and health outcomes before disease onset. The ISO accepts Solution Summaries now through March 5, 2029, with multiple awards anticipated under Other Transactions (OTs). Eligible proposers include for-profit companies, non-profits, and academia. Solutions must be novel (not incremental) and align with PHO interests in prevention, early detection, behavior change, and system-level innovations.

How much funding would I receive?

The solicitation does not specify dollar amounts or funding ceilings. Awards are made as Other Transaction (OT) agreements at the government’s discretion, with specific payment structures negotiated individually. As a rule of thumb, companies should request only what they need to reach a meaningful technical or commercialization milestone—a concrete point that clearly demonstrates feasibility, enables transition, or unlocks follow-on investment.

What could I use the funding for?

The Proactive Health Office (PHO), one of ARPA-H’s mission offices, is seeking solutions to improve the health spans and health outcomes of Americans prior to the onset of disease and/or the development of diminished quality of life from illness. Specifically, PHO hypothesizes that: 1) the development of novel early detection methods and prophylactic interventions could drastically improve the health of American throughout their lives; 2) population-level improvements in access to and uptake of disease increase prevention- and wellness-promoting behaviors; and 3) system-level innovations are required to deliver proactive health measures effectively.

Specific PHO interest areas include:

• Novel prevention, detection, and prophylactic treatment methods for disease, including:

  i. Prophylactic approaches to prevention of diseases and harmfuldisease outcomes.

  ii. Methods for continuous and widespread sensing of health-state, and early disease indicators that can be deployed at population-scales.

  iii. Novel and scalable methods for early detection of disease and illness that include the use of low/no-cost sensing modalities.

• Population-level approaches to increase the adoption of prevention- and wellness behaviors:

  i. Methods to inform and educate individuals about healthy behaviors, including lifestyle and preventative medical measures.

  ii. Methods that incentivize individuals to adopt and maintain healthy behaviors.

  iii. Novel approaches to increasing individual health spans and independence even in the absence of disease.

  iv. Early indicators of both disease- and pre-disease states, and measures associated with proactive health outcomes that are both inexpensive and effective. Low-cost, high-uptake mental health resiliency and mindfulness-building methods for individuals.

• System innovation for the delivery of proactive health outcomes:

  i. Novel, robust, and predictive surrogates for long-term health outcomes with associated epidemiological models.

  ii. Valuation models for long-term treatment effects for vaccination, screening, and other public health interventions.

  iii. New funding and delivery models for preventative interventions.

• Other Topics

  High-quality submissions that propose revolutionary technologies that meet the goals of PHO will be considered even if they do not address the areas of interest listed above.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are significant indirect benefits to receiving an ARPA-H Proactive Health Office (PHO) agreement:

• Government Validation and Credibility:
  Being selected by ARPA-H—the nation’s newest high-impact biomedical research agency—signals exceptional scientific credibility and alignment with the federal government’s most forward-leaning health innovation priorities. This “ARPA-H validation” often accelerates partnerships with major healthcare systems, research institutions, and investors who recognize the rigor and selectivity of government-vetted innovation.

• Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
  Award recipients are frequently featured in ARPA-H announcements, federal health innovation communications, and national press coverage. This visibility positions your company as a recognized leader in translational health technology and attracts new collaborators, talent, and private-sector investment.

• Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
  ARPA-H performers gain access to a broad innovation ecosystem spanning federal health agencies, academic research centers, and industry partners. These relationships foster collaboration, facilitate regulatory readiness, and open pathways to follow-on contracts, pilot deployments, and commercialization opportunities within the U.S. health system.

• Nondilutive Growth and Strategic Leverage:
  Because funding is nondilutive, companies can scale and validate core technologies without giving up equity. This validation and maturity achieved under government sponsorship often lead to higher valuations and greater leverage in future fundraising or acquisition discussions.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Open period: now through March 5, 2029.

• Step 1 (required): Submit a Solution Summary via the ARPA-H Solution Submission Portal. ARPA-H strives to provide written feedback within 30 business days of submission.

• Step 2: If encouraged, you’ll generally have 45 calendar days from feedback to submit a full proposal (unless ARPA-H specifies otherwise).

• Review cadence: ARPA-H reviews proposals on a rolling basis and strives to issue a decision within 60 calendar days of receiving a full proposal.

• Award timing: After selection, final negotiations for an Other Transaction (OT) award are completed rapidly, and invoicing is handled through Payment Management Services.

Because of this streamlined process, most ARPA-H applicants move from initial Solution Summary to award decision in approximately 4–5 months—making ARPA-H one of the fastest federal funders for high-impact health innovation projects.

Where does this funding come from?

The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a federal R&D agency within HHS, issuing awards under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 290c(g)(1)(D) via OT agreements.

Who is eligible to apply?

Academia, non-profit organizations, for-profit entities, hospitals, community health centers, and non-federal research centers. Non-U.S. entities may participate if compliant with all applicable laws.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Reviewers assess (in descending importance):

1. Scientific/technical merit—innovative, complete plans with clear deliverables, risks, and mitigations;

2. Contribution & relevance to ARPA-H’s mission—transformative potential, unmet need, commercialization/transition thinking, and IP/software approaches that enable adoption (preference for open standards/OSS where appropriate);

3. Team capabilities/experience—track record delivering similar efforts on budget/schedule;

4. Cost/budget alignment with the technical approach. ARPA-H encourages proposing the best technical solution over low-risk/minimal-uncertainty concepts.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Standards & IP: strong preference for open, consensus-based standards (e.g., FHIR/TEFCA, DICOM) and commercial-friendly open-source licenses when feasible; proposals must justify any deviations/standard extensions and may need a pre-submission meeting for exceptions. Provide good-faith IP rights representations; pre-publication review may be required when sensitive info could be disclosed.

• Compliance: Human Subjects (IRB), Animal Subjects (IACUC), NIH Genomic Data Sharing (if applicable), CUI handling, research security disclosures (including CHIPS/NPSM-33 requirements), and OCI disclosures/mitigation.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive full proposal under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $4,000 to submit a solution summary.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Continuing Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS) Multiple Authority Announcement (MAA)

Executive Summary:

The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Human Effectiveness Directorate (AFRL/RH) and the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) are awarding up to $1 billion in total funding under the CHEERS Multiple Authority Announcement (MAA) to support U.S. companies, universities, and research partners advancing technologies that enhance human performance, resilience, and health in aerospace and defense environments.

White papers are accepted through September 30, 2027, and proposal invitations are issued on a rolling basis. Companies should submit white papers as soon as possible in order to have the highest likelihood of funding.

How much funding would I receive?

Funding is project-dependent and determined by the technical approach propose. Typical awards will range from $300,000 to $5,000,000.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding can used for the full range of R&D activities from basic and applied R&D to prototype and experimental testing. See a list of focus areas below:

• Airman Systems Directorate (RH)

  Activities within the 711HPW are organized into research areas which are categorized based on the technology readiness level (TRL). Product lines focus on advanced technology development and identifying paths for technology transition while the CTC’s and CRA’s focus on basic research through early applied research. Each division further breaks down the research into Lines of Effort (LoE) or Product Area (PA) for each CTC or PL, respectively. Descriptors of PL, CTC and CRA are provided below:

  • Product Line (PL): An organizational construct within the Airman Systems Directorate for engineering and transition of technology to the Department of the Air Force and Department of Defense. A Product Line organizes and manages inter-related technology demonstrations and transition paths for Airman Systems Directorate technologies at late applied and advanced technology development stages. The product line may integrate research and engineering tasks across several CTCs within AFRL.

  • Core Technical Competency (CTC): CTCs represent the technical foundation that is difficult to duplicate and allows AFRL to provide unique technical leadership. They span basic research, applied research, and advanced technology development encompassing the people, information, facilities, equipment, and programs allowing AFRL to solve critical AF and national security problems.

  • Core Research Area (CRA): A subset of the Core Technical Competencies within the Airman Systems Directorate. CRAs represent a focused group of basic and early applied research, focused on investigating revolutionary, higher risk concepts. The CRAs mature new foundational technologies and transition promising research to product lines of the organization.

  Airman Biosciences (RHB)

  • Aerospace & Operational Medicine PL1: Matures and transitions aeromedical knowledge, technology, and materiel solutions in force health protection, human health and performance, and aeromedical evacuation & enroute care in order to enable, sustain, enhance, and restore operational and aeromedical health and human performance for Airmen executing Air Force missions across all operational domains. Objectives focus on generating high performance Airmen and Guardians through medical availability, enhancing joint combatant commander capabilities, and maximizing human capital and strategic resources by aligning resources to strategic and workforce development. The goal is to transition products that address validated AF/AFMS requirements by focusing on stakeholder engagement to ensure clear demand signals and to create and maintain extensive partnership network to ensure rapid execution and flexibility.

    • Air & Space Austere Environment Patient Transport (En Route Care) PA1: Advances combat casualty care in the air through biomedical research into interventional strategies and technologies that mitigate the risks for additional insult due to aeromedical evacuation. Transitions promising Science and Technology (S&T) into knowledge and material products that promote the recovery and return to duty of injured or ill service members, from point of injury back to definitive care. Research within this program includes but is not limited to ground medical operations in agile combat employment, autonomous care of patient movement, and optimization of patient movement.

    • Air & Space Force Health Protection (FHP) PA2: Medical development and biomedical technology investments seek to deliver an improved FHP capability across the full spectrum of operations with research that prevents injury/ illness through improved identification and control of health risks. Under FHP, subproject areas include Occupational Hazard Exposure (Includes Flight Hazards and Integrated Risk), Targeted Risk Identification, Mitigation and Treatment (Formerly Pathogen ID and Novel Therapeutics and includes Big Data), FHP Technologies Development and Assessment (Assay and disease detection), and Health Surveillance, Infection, Injury & Immunity. FHP also includes Innovations and Personalized Medicine. Operational medicine is focused on in garrison care – our next most critical issue post OIF/OEF – and how to care for the whole patient and consideration of comorbidities in treatment of wounded warriors and dependents.

  • Biotechnology for Performance, Research, and Demonstration PL2: Develops and delivers capabilities to enhance human performance in near-peer conflict. Objectives focus on modular systems that integrate with warfighting platforms and maintaining and enhancing end-user engagement to ensure relevance and realism all while working in close sync with DoD and external partners to deliver high value solutions. The goal is to build momentum for Wearable technology, continue to develop and advocate for human assessment & tracking, strategically plan for product usage in austere environments, and expand on current platform products to develop and connect capabilities with operational challenges.

    • Airman Sensing & Assessment PA1: Develop and demonstrate advanced prototype products that integrate physiological, cognitive, behavioral, and environmental sensing capabilities with validated analytics, assessments, and intervention capabilities to sustain and enhance air and space operator performance.

    • Human Performance Augmentation & Development PA2: Develop and deliver capabilities to enhance human performance in near-peer conflict by focusing on modular systems that integrate with warfighting platforms. Working in close sync with DoD and external partners to deliver high value solutions to maintain and enhance end-user engagement to ensure relevance and realism.

    • Air & Space Physiology, Medicine, and Human Performance (HP) PA3: Enables, sustains, and optimizes performance of Airmen through elevation and alleviation of health effects associated with AF operational missions. Addresses operational environments such as the mitigation of stress in AF personnel, to include aircrew, care providers, aircraft maintainers, intelligence, surveillance and cyber operators, as well as remote piloted aircraft operators. Research within this project includes but is not limited to airman performance and readiness, advancing air and space medicine, and medical operator performance digital engineering. Advanced technology development to enable, sustain, and optimize cognitive, behavior and physiologic performance in highpriority career fields for the United States Air Force (USAF) and in multidomain operations. The sub-project areas include cognitive and physiologic performance under operational and environmental stressors, detection and improvement of physiological performance, and safety via sensor systems and targeted conditioning, which includes training techniques for optimal performance. This project also develops and demonstrates technologies which ingest health status monitoring data to provide scalable situational awareness of individual, unit, and group medical readiness in support of command and control and develops strategies to mitigate performance limitations through physical, pharmacological/non-pharmacological, or behavioral medical interventions and/or technological augmentation.

  • Medical and Operational Biosciences CTC1: Develops, validates, and enhances medical and operational biosciences and emergent biotechnologies for transition into advanced development products in the Air and Space operational environment to lead to a highly resilient and medically ready force. These products can sense, assess, sustain, and segment warfighter physiological-cognitive performance in multi-domain operations. Deliverables will be enhancing and researching new technologies and concepts to sustain, augment, and restore the multi-domain Airman & Guardian Health and Performance. Customers, end-users, and stakeholders include the DHP and DAF 6.3 programs and product lines: Human Performance/Medical Readiness, Force Health Protection, and En Route Care as some of the primary users.

    • Biotechnology for Health and Performance CRA1: The Biotechnology for Health and Performance CRA utilizes multivariant, systems biology approaches to provide advanced science and technology solutions to understand the warfighter’s biologic state and the underlying mechanism of responses with the goal of enabling, enhancing, and sustaining the human's ability to dominate air, space and cyberspace.

    • Applied Cognitive Neurosciences CRA2: Develops and validates technologies in cognitive neuroscience and physical performance to sustain, augment, and recover operator performance and determine medical attributes/metrics for optimal career field alignment.

    • Health and Performance Sensing and Assessment CRA3: Develops sensing technologies in a variety of form factors to identify, validate and monitor human signatures related to Airmen's and Guardians’ health, exposures and physical/cognitive performance in their associated environments. The research from this CRA will develop sensing solutions optimized for real-time, noninvasive and autonomous sensing and assessing capabilities to enhance and protect Airmen and Guardians in a variety of operational environments.

    • Biomedical Impact of Air and Space CRA4: Conducts research investigating Airman and Guardian performance degradation resulting from exposure to air and space environments and seek understanding the fundamental mechanisms driving environmental and operational risks. Develop technologies to mitigate or eliminate the root physiologic causes of these degradations and to ultimately optimize Airman and Guardian performance resulting in the capability to fly faster, higher, and longer than our adversaries.

  Bioeffects (RHD)

  • Bioeffects PL: Creates and demonstrates developmental technology & tools to generate products/applications. These products provide optimized design requirements for weapon systems & personal protection device developers, risk and collateral hazard assessments for directed energy systems, and analysis libraries for the representation of humans as part of model-based systems engineering approaches and within engineering-level models of system performance, informing overall system performance impacts and adding fidelity to concepts in wargames. Approaches include the integration of components in engagement and mission-level simulation tools within USAF and DoD software architectures, and model-based systems engineering artifacts to enable future integration and technology transition. Key technologies include directed energy bioeffects systems characterization and risk assessment, directed energy bioeffects components of modeling and simulation tools, and human representation in digital engineering.

  • Bioeffects CTC1: The Bioeffects CTC will conduct research to enable the maximum safe exploitation of the electromagnetic spectrum for nation defense by protecting personnel & communities and assessing weapons applications. CTC research will focus on characterizing fundamental bioeffects, optimizing the safety/effectiveness of directed Energy systems, developing/assessing dosimetry tools, modeling & simulation of products/applications, protecting device development and providing science-based information to national & international safety standards.

    • Directed Energy Bioeffects Modeling, Simulation, & Analysis CRA1: The directed energy bioeffects modeling, simulation, & analysis core research area emphasizes research that focuses on new modeling, simulation, and analysis techniques which represent and optimize concepts of directed energy systems employment from the bioeffect standpoint, develops capabilities for studies and means of measuring of effectiveness and suitability for directed energy systems to include direct, scalable, and collateral effects. Research areas include highperformance/ high-fidelity multi-physics simulations, advanced electromagnetic dosimetry models, mechanistic theories & models of injury, thermal/thermoregulatory response models, physics-to-physiology color vision theory, component models of human response to directed energy, statistical approaches for risk assessment, near-real-time numerical approaches and surrogating complexity through machine learning.

      • Directed Energy Bioeffects Modeling Simulation & Analysis LOE1: Develop and mature physics & engineering-level models for directed energy dosimetry & the resulting biological effects; create algorithms encapsulating empirical datasets & physics-level models of directed energy dose response; supports directed energy modernization campaign and enables the Directed Energy Weapons Review and Approval (DEWRAP) process.

      • Directed Energy Bioeffects Dosimetry LOE3: Develop novel dosimetry to better understand directed energy interactions and injury to inform software approaches enabling simulation of dynamic scenarios; supports directed energy modernization.

    • Directed Energy Bioeffects & Mechanisms CRA2: The directed energy bioeffects & mechanisms CRA provides fundamental knowledge of mechanisms of interaction of directed energy with molecules, cells, tissues, and organs in support of military directed energy systems and enables future weapon systems with scalable, disruptive, and ultra-precise effects. Research areas include: discovery science for understanding mechanisms, neurobiological & behavioral response to directed energy, hardening of biological targets to directed energy, mechanistic response of human vision to directed energy, epigenetic response to directed energy exposure, membrane and ion channel response to rapid onset exposures, supra-threshold response – severity of effects, and human factors in technologies for protection.

      • Research in Directed Energy Multi-Interaction Systems LOE2: Develop and deliver an integrated modeling environment and studies to address critical national defense interests & prevent technological surprises. Study radio frequency, combined or synergistic responses, and their interaction with biology.

      • Directed Energy Hazard & Protection Assessment LOE4: Feedback & expertise for DoD to optimize safety/performance trades for directed energy systems; evaluation of dose-response of directed energy exposures to achieve specific endpoint; understand human vision response to optical radiation and related protective devices; elucidate margin of effectiveness and safety to meet DoD mission success. Assure no technology surprise.

      • Directed Energy Weapon Effects LOE5: Feedback & expertise for DoD to optimize safety/performance trades for directed energy systems & provide scientific basis for risk criteria definitions; Allows directed energy weapon modernization & enables review and approval processes for weapons systems.

  Warfighter Interactions & Readiness (RHW)

  • Airman-Machine Integration PL1: Delivers advanced, situationally-adaptive and scalable interface technologies and decision aiding tools. S&T is focused on ABMS compliant, intuitive user interfaces, and intelligent aided decision support to provide rapid, accurate battlefield awareness, maximized distributed human-machine team performance and decision superiority. Operator-centric interfaces increase human combat capabilities while managing human cognitive workload in complex, degraded environments. Key technologies include human-autonomy collaboration and trust in autonomy, development of successful distributed, heterogeneous teams with metrics of team performance, exploitation of human perception and enhancement of operational communication. These efforts address the critical needs for ABMS and JADC2 with optimal human-machine teams ready to operate.

  • Readiness PL2: Develops and extends technologies and tools for improving the cognitive effectiveness, performance and proficiency of airmen in current and potential future operational mission contexts. Aims to deliver operationally relevant, unobtrusive, integrated metrics, software, & hardware to assess proficiency & readiness in real-time. Develops methodologies to create models & algorithms for performance prediction, training support, & automated instruction. Key technologies include the ability to support multi-capable airmen resilience and mission performance in austere deployed contexts and develop standards for sharable scenario content, data, models, & metrics.

  • Analytics PL3: Identifies & matures software that streamlines workflow & enables cognition at the scale of war, enabling airmen effectiveness in the air, space, & cyberspace domains for effective C2ISR in Multi-Domain Operations. Develops analytic tools that optimize human cognition with the power of machine computation, thereby enabling consumers to better visualize, interpret, and act on information. Aims to deliver software that is open-architecture, modular, networked, and distributed; able to leverage statistics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence; and focuses on speed, accuracy, insight, and action.

  • Warfighter Interfaces and Teaming CTC1: The Warfighter Interfaces and Teaming CTC will conduct research to enable robust decision superiority across our Air and Space Forces by dynamically optimizing the integration of Warfighter cognition with increasingly complex and intelligent machines/systems, creating maximally effective and resilient warfighting teams. CTC research will focus on discovering, developing, evaluating, and transitioning advanced adaptive warfighter interface technology, mission-optimized distributed team performance enhancements, communication management processes, and context-tailored intelligent decision aids/analytics in order to achieve and maintain decision superiority in uncertain environments against peer threats.

    • Distributed Teaming and Communication CRA1: The Distributed Teaming & Communication CRA emphasizes research that explores the rapid formation, real-time assessment, and dynamically optimized performance of distributed heterogeneous teams of warfighters as well as human-machine teams in order to enable rapid, agile & robust mission operations. Research areas will include: methods to enable the rapid formation of mission-effective heterogeneous teams, dynamic monitoring / assessment of team performance via optimal assemblage of novel and existing metrics, adaptive tactics for recovery from real or predicted team performance degradations, and novel distributed communication & collaboration tools, technologies and management methods that are responsive to variable network environments.

      • Dynamic Team Performance Assessment LOE1: Enable the rapid formation, real-time assessment, and dynamically optimized performance of distributed heterogeneous teams of warfighters as well as human-machine teams in order to enable rapid, agile & robust mission operations. Research areas include methods to support the rapid formation of mission-effective heterogeneous teams, dynamic monitoring of team performance via optimal assemblage of novel and existing metrics, and real-time contextual aids from team communication.

      • Team Optimization and Recovery LOE2: Design, develop, and evaluate team optimization and recovery technologies to enhance communication, coordination, and improve decision making among distributed teams. Research areas include interfaces to support joint tasking and team shared awareness (SA) across multiple domains as well as conversational AI technologies to enable high bandwidth natural communications.

    • Human Machine Interactions CRA2: The Human-Machine Interactions CRA emphasizes research to identify principles of human interaction with highly complex systems, including advanced automation & increasingly intelligent AI enabled machines. The goal of this research is to achieve and sustain decision superiority across complex & uncertain mission environments. Research areas include identifying, characterizing and overcoming key challenges to warfighter interactions with complex and intelligent systems such as situationally-adaptive interface design and usability, knowledge representation across sensory modalities, system observability & transparency, directability, joint cognitive decision making, and maintaining calibrated trust across changing conditions.

      • Rapid Joint-Cognitive Awareness LOE1: To develop human-centric interfaces and interaction strategies for improved AI/automation transparency, closed-loop adaptive systems that are responsive to warfighter state, and advanced techniques for effectively visualizing large, complex data sets.

      • HMI-enabled Decision Superiority LOE2: To develop capabilities for continuous planning for C2, next generation interfaces for complex intelligent platforms, and interfaces tailored for emerging Cognitive Warfare (CogWar) concepts.

  • Human Learning and Cognition (HLC) CTC2: The Human Learning and Cognition CTC enables more lethal Air and Space Forces through research on human multisensory perception, learning, information processing, and action. The research seeks to maximize mission effectiveness by (1) Establishing a persistent, global training and test ecosystem that creates the foundation for personalized, proficiency-based readiness for multi-capable Airmen and Guardians in joint all-domain operations, (2) Creating capabilities that allow teams of humans and machines to adapt and learn together in real time in training and operational settings, & (3) Advancing considerations of human performance in system development and operational planning with digital models of perception, cognition, & action.

    • Digital Model of Cognition CRA1: The Digital Models of Cognition Core Research Area emphasizes research to identify computational and mathematical mechanisms to represent human perception, information processing, and behavior, including the integration of models that reflect the role of internal and external factors that modulate performance efficiency and effectiveness. The goal is to develop holistic models that support quantitative understanding and prediction of mission effectiveness across domains and at different levels of abstraction for improved systems engineering, wargaming, and operational planning.

      • Holistic Models for Decision-Making LOE1: Develop models of cognitive systems that support quantitative understanding and prediction of mission effectiveness for decision superiority.

      • Information Mastery in Cognitive Warfare LOE2: Analytic methods, models, and tradecraft that enables operators to improve Information-Related Capability (IRC).

    • Learning and Operational Training CRA2: The Learning and Operational Training Core Research Area emphasizes learning and understanding in the context of evolving technology. This includes research to establish an ecosystem that maximizes mission effectiveness while minimizing costs by matching technologies to learning and performance needs; supporting high resolution human and system measurement and quantitative, proficiency-centric readiness assessment and prediction at the individual and team levels; and exploring how to enable human and machine co-learning to support mutual adaptation and understanding in human-machine teams.

      • Warfighter Learning Technologies LOE1: Research, demonstrate, & transition learning technologies, methods, & infrastructure for personalized, proficiency-based readiness.

      • Co-Learning for Adaptive Human and Machine Teams LOE2: Establish the foundation for interactive learning and collaborative training of humans and AI-enabled machines to enable uniquely effective human-autonomy teams.

• United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM)

  Aerospace Medicine and Physiology

  • Aerospace Physiology: Solutions relating to physiologic assessment of aircrew in high altitude Fighters/Trainers.

    • Assessments of the physiologic response to exposures and stressors from the fighter/trainer environment; can cover any of the following: including effects of fluctuating pressure, high O2, air quality, breathing resistance, thermal burden, dehydration, rest/sleep (physical fatigue), cognitive fatigue, Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) integration (how AFE impacts in-flight physiology, and how AFE components interact with each other to impact physiology and aircrew performance), and combined stressors on performance and decision making in ground-based testing and operational environments, including the analysis of potential countermeasures to optimize pilot performance and eliminate sources of risk.

    • Solutions to sustain Aircrew performance in extreme environments.

    • Conduct comprehensive technology assessments of the current military health system simulators that can monitor and track physiologic responses from training student pilots.

    • There is a strong demand for wearables that are cross compatible across multiple systems to collect physiologic data, that are reliable and validated in the operational environment. Offerors are to conduct a comprehensive technology assessment of commercial off the shelf products, including their suitability for use in the operational environment and their validated measurement capabilities, to help aid aircrew and decision makers on what can be flown in the aircraft and what can be accurately collected from those sensors.

    • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Treatment for Aircrew and Maintainers: Neck and back pain is a known occupational hazard for the high-performance aircraft community. The government seeks solutions, including tools to prevent, reduce, screen and diagnose musculoskeletal condition as well as alternative/integrative medicine approaches, for prevention or treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. Proposed solutions shall focus on providing reliable measurements to determine platform-specific neck/back dysfunction and improvements due to embedded care.

    • Gender-specific operational aircrew considerations

    • Assessment, modeling, detection, and/or mitigation Aircrew and Operator fatigue

  • Precision Medicine and Medical Standards: Development of solutions relating to the following areas:

    • Surveillance of conditions, indications, clinical practice guideline adherence, and outcomes to support cost benefit analyses for Air Force population.

    • Genomics for mishap investigations (gene expression, subtracting human and molecular autopsy).

    • Studies providing data to support evidence-based aerospace medicine standards and waivers.

    • Psychological Performance and Mental Health (solutions should relate to at least one of the following areas)

      • Mental health and psychological disorders amongst airmen and potential influence on readiness and retention.

      • Neurocognitive diversity; cognitive testing and correlates with mental health and other outcomes.

      • Assessment of the feasibility of integrating the use of personality data and wearable technology to facilitate adjustment and success during career specific training. Personality assessments and wearables both as tools to facilitate readiness via positive change, wellbeing, and performance by increasing self-awareness.

  Public Health and Preventative Medicine

  • Development, optimization, and validation of pathogen detection methodologies

  • Cancer analysis in the Air Force population

    • Development and evaluation of prototypes that can identify carcinogenic toxins or hazardous materials associated with military flight operations from shipboard or land bases or facilities.

    • Development and evaluation of prototypes that can identify exposures to ionizing radiation and nonionizing radiation from which airmen could have received increased radiation amounts.

    • Establishment of guidelines for carcinogen exposure as it relates to demographics for each airman to include duty stations, duties and aircraft flow.

    • Establishment of guidelines that outline the duties and potential exposures of airmen that are associated with higher incidence of cancer.

    • Development and evaluation of screening tools and/or methods that relate to carcinogen exposure to airmen.

  • Assess methodologies to prevent wound infection.

  • Assess infectious disease conditions in Air Force populations.

  Occupational Medicine and Bioenvironmental Engineering

  • Enhancement of capabilities to detect, measure, and assess occupational and environmental health hazard contaminants and extreme environmental conditions.

    • Assess technologies to enhance capabilities to detect and identify chemical, biological, toxins, radiological, directed energy, poisons and physical hazards on surfaces (including soil and powder), in liquids and in the air in near real-time at the detector's point of operation and notify end user of risk.

    • Assessment of Aviation-Specific Exposures

    • Develop, test and evaluate real-time health threat surveillance and reporting system inclusive of all available health information/databases to identify risks/outbreaks and provide decision support to operational commanders.

  • Evaluation/development of mitigation technology capable of reducing or eliminating occupational and environmental health hazard risks.

  En Route Care/Expeditionary Medicine/Prolonged Field Care: Needs in this area include medical capabilities to support in route care to/from remote, austere settings, and in extreme environments.

  • Training methodologies to improve operational readiness for individuals and teams responsible for delivering basic and advanced en route care capabilities within the aeromedical evacuation system.

  • Technology assessment/development to support the Air Force Surgeon General’s medical modernization priorities with a focus on modernizing outdated technologies and techniques to promote en route care growth/preparation for future peer/near-peer conflicts involving mass casualty care.

  Education and training technologies and methodologies to support efforts to generate, develop, and maintain skillsets across the AOME.

  Applications of data science to analyze medical and operational data and outcomes across the AOME, which may include implementation of AI and machine learning to answer operationally relevant questions.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, CHEERS participation offers significant indirect advantages for growth and strategic positioning:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Selection under AFRL’s CHEERS program signals strong technical merit and alignment with Department of the Air Force human performance priorities—an endorsement that enhances your credibility with defense primes, OEMs, and investors.

Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
Awardees benefit from exposure in federal announcements, AFRL communications, and defense industry press—raising visibility and positioning your company as a trusted innovation partner in the human-performance and aerospace ecosystem.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
CHEERS projects operate within a national network that includes top-tier military researchers, AFRL directorates, and medical readiness centers. This access often leads to future R&D partnerships and contracting opportunities.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
By advancing your technology with nondilutive support and demonstrating government-backed validation, companies can increase valuation and strengthen their position for acquisition or strategic investment by defense and medical technology leaders.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• White Paper Deadline: Rolling through September 30, 2027. This means applicants should apply as soon as possible before funds are fully expended.

• Review Period: Technically 180 days for AFRL to review white papers - but it could also be reviewed faster.

• Proposal Invitation: AFRL will invite full proposals only from offerors whose white papers align with Air Force needs.

• Proposal Deadline: Defined in each Request for Proposal (RFP).

• Award Timing: Awards are issued once funds become available; no awards are made until funding is confirmed.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding is issued by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) under the following authorities:

• Open Period 1: 10 U.S.C. 4001 / FAR 35.016 (Broad Agency Announcement).

• Open Period 2: 10 U.S.C. 4023 (Procurement for Experimental Purposes).

These authorities allow AFRL to fund both research contracts and prototype agreements, depending on project maturity and experimental needs.

Who is eligible to apply?

1. Open to U.S. companies, universities, and research organizations.

2. Foreign participation is allowed subject to export and security controls.

3. Cost sharing is not required.

4. Offerors may submit multiple white papers, provided each represents a distinct technical approach.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Offer innovative, defense-relevant solutions that measurably enhance warfighter performance, medical readiness, or operational resilience.

1. Demonstrate clear technical feasibility, transition potential, and sound risk mitigation.

2. Show strong alignment with AFRL’s human effectiveness and medical research priorities.

3. Have experienced teams capable of performing under experimental or prototype authorities.

Evaluation criteria (in descending order of importance):

1. Uniqueness and innovation.

2. Understanding of scope and technical approach.

3. Technical soundness and team qualifications.

4. Transition potential.

5. Cost realism and value.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Export Control: Some projects may require U.S. or Canada Joint Certification (DD 2345).

• Human/Animal Subjects & Hazardous Materials: Approval requirements vary by project and will be outlined in each solicitation.

• S&T Protection: AFRL’s Science and Technology protection and OPSEC rules apply.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive white paper + full proposal will likely take 120–200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for the White Paper for $3000. Full proposal quoted upon invitation.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

View the Funding Announcements:

• Continuing Human Enabling Enhancing Restoring and Sustaining (Master Announcement)

• CHEERS Open Period 1 - All Technical Areas

• CHEERS Open Period 2 - All Technical Areas

CHIPS Research & Development Office (CRDO) Broad Agency Announcement

Executive Summary:

The CHIPS Research and Development Office (CRDO) at NIST is awarding at least $10 Million per award—via Other Transaction (OT) agreements—for research, prototyping, and commercialization projects that advance U.S. microelectronics, including work tied to AI, quantum, biotechnology/biomanufacturing, commercialization of innovation, and standards. Applications are accepted on a rolling basis which means companies should submit white papers ASAP. Receive a complimentary assessment to see if your company and project is a fit for this funding.

How much funding would I receive?

Budgets should be at least $10 million and reflect actual project needs. CRDO may fund only a portion of total costs and can fund multi-phase projects incrementally based on satisfactory progress, mission fit, and availability of funds. Awards are negotiated as OT agreements. Cost sharing is not required for all awards, though CRDO may choose to fund only part of a project.

What could I use the funding for?

Eligible activities include research, prototyping, and commercialization efforts that strengthen U.S. leadership and the domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Priority topic areas include:

• Semiconductors (e.g., advanced testing/assembly/packaging, next-gen devices and memory, design co-optimization, automation/AI in fabs, secure supply chains)

• Application of AI for advanced microelectronics R&D (e.g., compute efficiency, edge AI, cryogenic ops, fab acceleration)

• Application of quantum technology (e.g., scalable quantum computing, quantum networks/sensing, domestic production of quantum hardware)

• Application of biotechnology/biomanufacturing for microelectronics (e.g., bioelectronics, implantable devices, scaling domestic bio-electronics manufacturing)

• Commercialization of innovations (e.g., adopting and commercializing federally funded discoveries, including through consortia)

• Standards development (e.g., quantum manufacturing, data/design/provenance/security standards).

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are significant indirect benefits to receiving a CHIPS R&D Office (CRDO) award:

• Government Validation and Credibility:
  Being selected by NIST’s CRDO signals strong technical credibility and alignment with national semiconductor priorities. That stamp of approval often accelerates partnerships with OEMs, primes, and investors who trust government-vetted innovation.

• Enhanced Market Visibility and Notoriety:
  Award recipients frequently receive public recognition in federal announcements, CHIPS R&D Office communications, and industry press. This visibility helps position your company as a trusted, strategic player in the microelectronics ecosystem.

• Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
  CRDO-funded projects are part of a national innovation network—creating opportunities to collaborate with leading researchers, manufacturers, and other awardees. Such access can unlock supply chain partnerships and future contracting opportunities.

• Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
  By maturing technology under nondilutive support and demonstrating government-backed validation, recipients often achieve greater value at exit—especially when positioning for acquisition by larger defense, semiconductor, or AI hardware firms.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Applications (beginning with a required White Paper) are accepted on a rolling basis through September 30, 2029 via Grants.gov. If a White Paper shows sufficient merit and relevance, CRDO may invite a Pre-negotiation Package (detailed technical and cost proposal). Awards are made on a rolling basis as packages are evaluated and terms are finalized. A specific funding disbursement date is not specified. Maximum project period is up to 5 years.

Where does this funding come from?

U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST—through the CHIPS Research and Development Office (CRDO)—under authority including 15 U.S.C. § 4656 and related CHIPS R&D statutes/policies. Assistance Listing: 11.042 CHIPS R&D.

Who is eligible to apply?

Domestic entities only: for-profit organizations, non-profits, accredited higher-education institutions, FFRDCs, and Federal entities (with conditions). Individuals and unincorporated sole proprietors are not eligible. Subawardees may include the above and foreign partners not otherwise prohibited, subject to security and other requirements.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Projects that:

• Advance national and economic security and U.S. technology leadership by strengthening domestic semiconductor supply chains and workforce

• Demonstrate strong scientific/technical merit with clear deliverables

• Show feasibility (experienced team, realistic costs, risk mitigation)

• Have credible commercial viability (market demand, transition plan)

• Show financial viability (sound capex, financial health, credible capital plan).

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Domestic production and control of IP: Foreign entities can apply but should develop and own the IP in the US.

• Security restrictions: no funds to foreign entities of concern; compliance with research security disclosures; prohibition on malign foreign talent recruitment programs

• CRDO may require return-on-investment instruments (e.g., equity, warrants, IP licenses, royalties/revenue sharing)

• Scope: general AI projects not directly tied to advanced microelectronics R&D are out of scope

• Reporting: financial, performance, and/or technical reports are required.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–180 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under CHIPS R&D initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our support is available at $300 per hour, with most CRDO proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission.

For non-VC backed startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

• Webinar - How to Win $10M for R&D from the New CHIPS CRDO BAA

• View Solicitation on Grants.Gov