Navy SBIR DON27BX01-NP001: ONR Open Topic for Low-Cost Heads Up Displays (HUDs) for Virtual & Augmented Reality (VR/AR)

Quick Answer

DON27BX01-NP001 is an Office of Naval Research SBIR Phase I open topic in the DoW SBIR 2027 Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO), Release 1, for low-cost, domestically sourced, NDAA-compliant heads-up displays (HUDs) with on-board 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) tracking for Navy and Marine Corps users. Phase I is up to $315,000 ($200,000 base plus $115,000 option), closing November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET.

ONR wants existing hardware: demonstration platforms, prototypes, and commercial products for first-person view (FPV) drone pilots and AR for Forward Observers and Joint Terminal Air Controllers.

Topic at a Glance

• Topic number: DON27BX01-NP001
• Title: ONR Open Topic for Low-Cost Heads Up Displays (HUDs) for Virtual & Augmented Reality (VR/AR)
• Component: Department of the Navy (Office of Naval Research)
• Solicitation: DoW SBIR 2027 CSO, Release 1
• Program and phase: SBIR Phase I
• Award ceiling: $315,000
• Period of performance: 6 month base plus 6 month option
• Technical volume limit: 10 pages
• Projected CMMC level: Level 2 (Self)
• Export control: Not marked as ITAR restricted on DSIP
• Focus areas: Human-Machine Interfaces; Integrated Sensing and Cyber
• Keywords: heads up display, augmented reality, human-machine interface, first person drone, virtual reality, mixed reality
• Pre-release: October 7, 2026
• Opens: October 28, 2026
• Closes: November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET
• Submission portal: DSIP at dodsbirsttr.mil

What the Office of Naval Research Is Looking For

The Navy and USMC have gaps in affordable, NDAA-compliant HUDs. ONR will give Phase I awardees operational context and technical thresholds, assess technologies against them, and provide feedback to align with warfighting needs.

Your existing hardware should meet one or both areas

• A HUD for FPV pilot operations with integrated display, signal inputs, and mounting locations for organic FPV equipment such as antennas, transmitters, and power supplies.
• An integrated HUD with native 6DOF tracking using on-board sensors (cameras, IMUs, magnetometers), compute, and battery power.

How the Phases Are Structured

Phase I describes your existing technology, the Navy system it would improve or replace, expected improvements, and a transition approach to both the Navy and commercial markets. Deliverables are a kick-off brief at 15 days, progress report at 90 days, and a final report, quad chart, and Initial Phase II proposal at 180 days. The Option, if exercised, covers initial design specifications for a Phase II prototype.

Phase II is open to all Phase I awardees through an Initial Phase II proposal, evaluated on the same criteria as Phase I. It generally includes a functional prototype, a transition plan covering production, fielding, logistics, and safety, and further commercialization.

Phase III supports incorporating low-cost HUDs into USMC Fires programs of record for Forward Observers, JTACs, and FPV drone attack operators.

Funding and Proposal Limits

• Phase I Base: up to $200,000 over 6 months.
• Phase I Option: up to $115,000 over 6 months, for a Phase I total of up to $315,000 (less TABA).
• Phase II: up to $2,000,000 including all options and TABA. All Phase I awardees may submit an Initial Phase II proposal.
• Navy instructions state awards under this CSO are executed as Other Transaction (OT) agreements.
• Technical Volume (Volume 2) limit: 10 pages, with the Option tasks inside the 10 pages. TABA of up to $6,500 is available for Phase I.

Who Is Eligible

• You must be a U.S. small business concern that meets SBIR ownership and size rules at the time of award.
• Your firm must perform at least two-thirds of the Phase I work.
• ONR wants existing hardware: demonstration platforms, prototypes, or commercial products, not a paper concept.
• DoW now limits proposals on a per-topic basis, so plan on one strong proposal for this topic.

Key Dates and How to Apply

• Now through October 28, 2026: pre-release. Topic authors are listed on the DSIP Topics and Topic Q&A page and you can call or email them directly with technical questions. This is the only window for direct contact.
• October 28, 2026: the topic opens for proposals in the Defense SBIR/STTR Innovation Portal (DSIP). After this date, questions go through DSIP Topic Q&A only.
• November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET: complete proposals must be certified and submitted in DSIP. A proposal still marked In Progress or Ready to Certify is not considered submitted.
• Before you submit, confirm an active SAM.gov registration, a DSIP account, completed Volume 6 Fraud, Waste, and Abuse training, and the Volume 7 foreign affiliation disclosure webform.

Is This Topic a Fit for Your Company?

This open topic is built for XR hardware startups and FPV goggle makers with a domestic supply chain story and a product already working. If your components are sourced from covered foreign countries, address NDAA compliance directly in the proposal.

BW&CO has helped deep tech founders secure $350M+ in non-dilutive funding. If you want a second opinion on fit, feasibility documentation, or a proposal plan before the deadline, book a call with our team below.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Navy SBIR topic DON27BX01-NP001?

DON27BX01-NP001 is an Office of Naval Research SBIR Phase I open topic under the DoW SBIR 2027 CSO, Release 1, for low-cost, domestically sourced, NDAA-compliant heads-up displays with 6DOF tracking for FPV drone pilots, Forward Observers, and JTACs.

How much funding is available?

Phase I has a Base of up to $200,000 over 6 months and an Option of up to $115,000 over 6 months, for up to $315,000 total. Phase II can be up to $2,000,000 including options and TABA.

When is the deadline?

The topic pre-released October 7, 2026, opens October 28, 2026, and closes November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET in DSIP.

How long can the technical volume be?

Navy Phase I technical volumes are limited to 10 pages, with a 10-point minimum font, and the Phase I Option tasks must fit inside those 10 pages.

Does ONR want new concepts?

No. ONR is requesting existing technology demonstration platforms, prototypes, and commercial products. The proposing small business should already have a hardware solution that meets one or both technical areas.

What contract type is used?

Navy instructions state awards under this CSO are executed as Other Transaction agreements.

Can I talk to the topic author?

Yes, during pre-release only, from October 7 until the topic opens on October 28, 2026. After that, questions go through DSIP Topic Q&A.

DAF STTR DAF27TZ01-DV001: AI-Enabled Computed Vision Air-to-Air Refueling Performance Assessment and Automated Pilot Debrief System

Quick Answer

DAF27TZ01-DV001 is a Department of the Air Force STTR Direct to Phase II topic in DoW STTR 2027 BAA Release 1 for an AI computer vision system that analyzes tanker camera video (especially KC-46) after aerial refueling and produces objective pilot performance scores and automated debrief products. Awards are up to $2,000,000 over up to 24 months, closing November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET.

Targets include debrief products within 15 minutes of video ingestion and at least 95 percent agreement with experienced instructors. As an STTR, you need a research institution partner performing at least 30 percent of the work.

Topic at a Glance

• Topic number: DAF27TZ01-DV001
• Title: AI-Enabled Computed Vision Air-to-Air Refueling Performance Assessment and Automated Pilot Debrief System
• Component: Department of the Air Force
• Solicitation: DoW STTR 2027 BAA, Release 1
• Program and phase: STTR Direct to Phase II
• Award ceiling: $2,000,000
• Period of performance: 24 months
• Technical volume limit: 35 pages or slides
• Projected CMMC level: Level 2 (Self)
• Export control: Not marked as ITAR restricted on DSIP
• Focus areas: Human-Machine Interfaces; Trusted AI and Autonomy
• Keywords: AI, machine learning, computer vision, aerial refueling, pilot training, flight analytics, human machine interface, VR, AR, aviation safety, KC-46, KC-135
• Pre-release: October 7, 2026
• Opens: October 28, 2026
• Closes: November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET
• Submission portal: DSIP at dodsbirsttr.mil

What the Air Force Is Looking For

Aerial refueling is one of the most demanding and safety-critical tasks aircrews perform, yet assessment still relies on instructor observation, self-assessment, and manual video review. The Air Force wants to turn each refueling sortie into objective, data-driven feedback that improves proficiency, reduces mishaps and equipment damage, and raises readiness.

The system should detect and track the boom or hose and the receiver, measure relative position, closure rate, approach vector, stability, and envelope adherence, correlate with available aircraft data, score performance and trends, and generate visual debriefs such as overlays, heat maps, timelines, and VR or AR replays. It must also automatically protect sensitive video, including masking unauthorized aircraft and sensitive geography. The vendor may choose the first 3 to 5 receiver platforms with Government concurrence.

Phase II tasks

• Task 1: system architecture, data acquisition, and secure CUI processing.
• Task 2: computer vision model adaptation and performance analytics, demonstrated at TRL 6+.
• Task 3: automated performance assessment, pilot feedback, and an instructor or master debriefer review interface (stretch goal: detect bent or broken boom, probe, or hose and FOD).
• Task 4: automated data protection and video processing.
• Task 5: pilot debrief visualization and training integration, including a VR/AR trade study.
• Task 6: operational demonstration with at least one aerial refueling training organization and a Phase III transition plan.

How the Phases Are Structured

Phase I is skipped. No Phase I proposals will be accepted. You must show Phase I type feasibility from prior research, lab validation, commercial development, or operational demonstrations performed outside the SBIR/STTR program. Offerors must show experience in at least half of the listed technical areas (computer vision on dynamic objects, high-speed motion imagery, tracking, aviation analytics, VR/AR and HMI, sensor and telemetry integration, controlled aviation data handling, automated video masking, and secure government software) and TRL 4 or greater at award.

Phase II executes the six tasks above and delivers an operational prototype.

Phase III transitions the capability to KC-46, KC-135, C-17, fighter, Navy, and Marine Corps refueling communities and autonomous refueling programs, with commercial aviation training as a dual-use market.

Funding and Proposal Limits

• Direct to Phase II award maximum: $2,000,000. Proposals above this amount will not be considered for evaluation or award.
• Award maximum duration: 24 months.
• Technical Volume (Volume 2) limit: 35 pages or slides.
• No Phase I proposals will be accepted and no Phase I awards will be made under this topic.
• TABA: DAF will provide up to $50,000 per Phase II award in addition to the topic amount. The detailed request must be in Volume 5.

Who Is Eligible

• You must be a U.S. small business concern that meets SBIR/STTR ownership and size rules at the time of award.
• This is an STTR topic, so you need a formal partner research institution (a university, FFRDC, or qualifying nonprofit). At least 40 percent of the work must be done by your firm and at least 30 percent by a single research institution, measured by direct and indirect costs. Deviations are not allowed.
• You must document Phase I type feasibility completed outside the SBIR/STTR program, substantially performed by your firm or principal investigator.
• DoW now limits proposals on a per-topic basis, so plan on one strong proposal for this topic.

Key Dates and How to Apply

• Now through October 28, 2026: pre-release. Topic authors are listed on the DSIP Topics and Topic Q&A page and you can call or email them directly with technical questions. This is the only window for direct contact.
• October 28, 2026: the topic opens for proposals in the Defense SBIR/STTR Innovation Portal (DSIP). After this date, questions go through DSIP Topic Q&A only.
• November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET: complete proposals must be certified and submitted in DSIP. A proposal still marked In Progress or Ready to Certify is not considered submitted.
• Before you submit, confirm an active SAM.gov registration, a DSIP account, completed Volume 6 Fraud, Waste, and Abuse training, and the Volume 7 foreign affiliation disclosure webform.

Is This Topic a Fit for Your Company?

Computer vision and aviation analytics companies with tracking experience on fast-moving objects are the core fit, especially those with flight training or simulation products. Line up the university or research institution partner early, since the STTR 30 percent minimum cannot be waived.

BW&CO has helped deep tech founders secure $350M+ in non-dilutive funding. If you want a second opinion on fit, feasibility documentation, or a proposal plan before the deadline, book a call with our team below.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is DAF STTR topic DAF27TZ01-DV001?

It is a Department of the Air Force STTR Direct to Phase II topic in DoW STTR 2027 BAA Release 1 for an AI computer vision system that assesses aerial refueling performance from tanker video and produces automated pilot debriefs.

How much funding is available?

Up to $2,000,000 over up to 24 months, plus up to $50,000 in TABA per Phase II award if requested in Volume 5.

Do I need a research institution partner?

Yes. As an STTR, at least 40 percent of the work must be performed by your small business and at least 30 percent by a single research institution.

What performance does the Air Force want?

Debrief products within 15 minutes of video ingestion, accurate tracking of position and refueling geometry, and at least 95 percent agreement with experienced instructors during validation.

Can I submit a Phase I proposal?

No. No Phase I proposals will be accepted. You must show Phase I type feasibility from work outside the SBIR/STTR program and TRL 4 or greater at award.

When is the deadline?

The topic opens October 28, 2026 and closes November 25, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET in DSIP.

ARPA-H SPECTRA ARPA-H-SOL-26-163: Autism Technology and Research Funding Guide for Startups

ARPA-H's Systems for Phenotypic Evaluation, Clinical Trajectories, Response, and Agency (SPECTRA) program aims to understand how autism develops across the lifespan and to act on that knowledge earlier and more precisely. The first open call is for Technical Area 4: everyday technologies such as wearables, communication devices, eye tracking, and AI speech tools that people want to use, and that generate assessment data as they are used. Companies, universities, and nonprofits are eligible.

Deadline: TA4 Solution Summaries are due October 18, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. TA1 and TA2 summaries are expected December 2, 2026, and TA3 summaries January 18, 2027.

Why This Opportunity Matters

About 1 in 31 U.S. children is diagnosed with autism, and an estimated 25 to 30 percent of autistic people are minimally verbal or nonspeaking. Diagnosis often comes late, data sit in silos, and most assessments do not work well for the people with the highest support needs. SPECTRA is designed to change that by connecting biology, environment, real-world data, and targeted interventions into one program.

For health technology companies, TA4 is the immediate opening. It is one of the rare federal programs that funds consumer-grade tools built for real homes and classrooms, not just clinics, and it rewards products that families actually keep using.

Key Facts at a Glance

• Sponsor: Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), Proactive Health Office
• Solicitation: ARPA-H-SOL-26-163, Innovative Solutions Opening
• Award type: Other Transaction (OT) agreements, with phased reviews and possible down-selects
• Award size: Not published. Proposers request funds across all phases on the Solution Summary cover page
• Program length: About four years, with TA4 gates at Months 12, 24, and 48
• TA4 Solution Summary due: October 18, 2026, 5:00 PM ET (portal open now)
• TA1 and TA2 Solution Summary due: December 2, 2026, 5:00 PM ET (details by amendment, expected late October)
• TA3 Solution Summary due: January 18, 2027, 5:00 PM ET (details by amendment, expected early December)
• Full proposals: Dates will be announced after Solution Summaries are reviewed
• Cost share: Resource sharing is encouraged but not required

What SPECTRA Funds

TA4: Technologies for Communication, Quality of Life, and Embedded Assessment (open now)

TA4 funds everyday tools that improve communication and daily function while collecting meaningful data in the background. ARPA-H names examples including wearables for sleep, movement, and autonomic state, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and speech interfaces, eye tracking on tablets and phones, low-channel EEG usable at home, camera-based analysis of movement and behavior, and immersive virtual environment tools. Multimodal combinations are encouraged.

Strong TA4 proposals personalize to each user on the device, adapt over a lifetime, keep users in control of their data, and share data through the program's common data model. A goal is to push validated early identification about ten months earlier than today's 16-month floor. An optional speech component calls for open-source, on-device speech recognition tuned for child and atypical speech. Tools that require users to perform an assessment task belong in TA1, not TA4, and closed ecosystems that cannot export data are out of scope.

TA1: Multi-Factor Analysis and Trajectory Identification (coming)

Multimodal analysis of genetic, biological, environmental, and medical factors to define autism trajectories. TA1 is analysis only and requires datasets and partners already in place.

TA2: Population-Scale Modeling and Data Integration (coming)

A federated, privacy-preserving national data network built on health data standards, with at least 10 live nodes and fast multisite queries.

TA3: Precision Intervention and Trajectory Testing (coming)

Adaptive platform trials stratified by trajectory, prioritizing sleep, seizures, GI issues, pain, anxiety, crisis, and regression.

Is Your Company a Fit?

TA4 is a strong fit for:

• Wearable and biosensing companies focused on sleep, autonomic state, or seizure and overload alerts
• AAC and communication device makers, especially for minimally verbal and nonspeaking users
• Speech AI teams willing to build open, on-device models
• Eye tracking, low-channel EEG, and computer vision companies with tools that run on common phones and tablets
• VR and immersive learning companies

ARPA-H asks for prior experience building technology for autistic people or comparable populations, plus pilot or usability data from the intended users, so teams with real-world deployments will be most competitive. Looking ahead, AI and multi-omics analytics companies fit TA1, federated data and privacy companies fit TA2, and clinical trial platforms and therapeutics companies fit TA3.

FFRDCs and government entities cannot participate, entities from covered foreign countries are excluded, and ARPA-H prioritizes work performed in the United States.

How to Apply

1. Register on the ARPA-H Solutions site. The TA4 portal is open now at solutions.arpa-h.gov. A UEI is not required for the Solution Summary but is required before award.
2. Submit a TA4 Solution Summary by October 18, 2026. Use the required Attachment A1 template, up to 7 pages for the concept, innovation and impact, proposed work, and team. The cover page, cost estimate, resource share strategy, and references do not count toward the limit.
3. Receive an encourage or discourage response. ARPA-H says its view should carry significant weight in your decision to continue.
4. Submit a full proposal. Requirements and deadlines will be released by amendment after summaries are reviewed.

You may submit to more than one technical area, but each must be a separate, standalone submission. Questions go through the Ask a Question page on the ARPA-H Solutions site.

How BW&CO Helps

BW&CO helps digital health, wearable, and AI companies decide which SPECTRA technical area fits, frame their real-world evidence for ARPA-H reviewers, and deliver a compliant Solution Summary on a tight timeline. We also track the TA1 through TA3 amendments so clients are ready the day each call opens. With $350M+ in non-dilutive funding secured for our clients, we help health technology founders compete for ARPA-H programs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ARPA-H SPECTRA program?

SPECTRA (Systems for Phenotypic Evaluation, Clinical Trajectories, Response, and Agency) is an ARPA-H program to understand and act on autism trajectories across the lifespan through analysis, data integration, precision interventions, and everyday assistive technologies.

When is the SPECTRA deadline?

TA4 Solution Summaries are due October 18, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. TA1 and TA2 summaries are expected December 2, 2026, and TA3 summaries January 18, 2027. Full proposal dates will be announced later.

What does SPECTRA TA4 fund?

Everyday technologies such as wearables, AAC and speech interfaces, phone and tablet eye tracking, low-channel EEG, computer vision, and immersive tools that improve communication and quality of life while generating real-world assessment data.

Can startups apply to SPECTRA?

Yes. ARPA-H is primarily interested in proposals from commercial performers, academic institutions, and nonprofits. FFRDCs and government entities cannot participate.

How much funding does SPECTRA provide?

ARPA-H has not published award sizes. Awards are Other Transaction agreements, and proposers request total funds across all phases in their Solution Summary.

How long is the SPECTRA TA4 Solution Summary?

Up to 7 pages using the required Attachment A1 template. The cover page, cost estimate, resource share strategy, and references are not counted.

DCSA Innovation Gateway (HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA): The Complete Guide for Startups

Executive Summary

The DCSA Innovation Gateway is a five-year commercial solicitation from the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) that awards Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) for prototype projects under 10 U.S.C. 4022. It is DCSA's front door for commercial innovators, and it is built specifically so that small businesses and companies with no prior defense contracting history can compete. Companies do not submit against the Gateway itself. They respond to individual Innovation Calls published on SAM.gov under the Gateway, starting with a 6-page Solution Concept Paper rather than a full proposal.

Solicitation number HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA. Open period: June 23, 2026 through June 22, 2031. NAICS code 541512, Computer Systems Design Services.

DCSA Innovation Gateway at a Glance

• Agency: Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA), Department of Defense

• Solicitation number: HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA

• Solicitation type: Commercial Solutions Opening style announcement resulting in prototype OTAs

• Award instrument: Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) for prototypes, 10 U.S.C. 4022

• Open period: June 23, 2026 to June 22, 2031

• First submission: 6-page Solution Concept Paper using the required template (Attachment 1)

• Where opportunities are posted: SAM.gov, as Innovation Calls referencing the DCSA Innovation Gateway

• Unsolicited proposals: Not accepted and not reviewed

• Cost share: Not required for most small businesses and nontraditional defense contractors

• Follow-on: Successful prototypes can move to a production contract or transaction without further competition

• Technical focus: Digital transformation, data and AI, cyber and industrial security, digital workforce and IT governance

What Is DCSA and Why Does This Solicitation Exist?

DCSA is the Department of Defense agency responsible for personnel vetting and background investigations, industrial security oversight of cleared contractor facilities, counterintelligence, insider threat detection, and security training across the National Industrial Security Program. It touches millions of security clearance records and thousands of cleared facilities, which makes it one of the most data-intensive agencies in the federal government.

The Innovation Gateway exists because DCSA wants commercial technology, not custom-built government software. The agency describes the Gateway as its commercially focused front door for innovators, with the goal of partnering with creative companies to solve its most critical mission challenges. Practically, that means DCSA is willing to skip the traditional FAR-based procurement path and use OTA authority to get prototypes on contract faster, with negotiable terms, negotiable intellectual property rights, and a direct path to production if the prototype works.

For a venture-backed startup or a small commercial software company, this is one of the more accessible defense entry points available, because the first submission is a short concept paper rather than a 50-page proposal with a full cost volume.

What DCSA Is Looking For: The Four Technical Priorities

The Gateway publishes four broad technical priority areas. Individual Innovation Calls narrow these into specific problem statements, but every concept must map back to one or more of these areas.

1. Digital Transformation Enablement

DCSA is seeking prototypes that accelerate agency-wide digital transformation by improving how digital capabilities are designed, delivered, governed, and sustained. The strong preference is for solutions that are reusable across multiple mission and business areas, reduce delivery timelines, improve user experience, and increase operational resilience and security. Enterprise applicability is the theme. A tool that solves one system's problem is far less compelling than a pattern that can be adopted across many systems.

• Digital Service Delivery Acceleration: Prototypes that shorten time-to-capability through repeatable delivery patterns such as standardized environments, automated pipelines, release orchestration, and operational readiness practices that work across diverse systems.

• Cloud and Infrastructure Modernization as an Enabler: Solutions that simplify adoption and operation of modern hosting through automation, resilience, performance optimization, and cost transparency, with a focus on enterprise applicability rather than single-system optimization.

• Modular Architecture and Incremental Modernization: Prototypes aligned with MOSA principles that promote modular, replaceable components, enable stepwise modernization, reduce vendor lock-in, and integrate with existing systems.

• Operational Excellence and Continuous Compliance: Efforts that build in observability, configuration management, incident readiness, and continuous compliance so modernized capabilities operate securely and reliably at scale.

2. Data Integration and Advanced Analytics

This priority sits at the center of DCSA's mission, because personnel vetting and industrial security are fundamentally data and risk problems.

• Data-Driven Decision Making: Enhancing data understanding, delivery, and management so DCSA can make faster and more accurate risk determinations in personnel and industrial security.

• AI and Machine Learning: Implementing AI capabilities that analyze large volumes of data, identify anomalies, and calculate potential risk, while keeping human judgment at the center of trust decisions. That last phrase matters. Concepts that fully automate a trust or clearance decision will not land well. Concepts that surface, rank, and explain risk for a human adjudicator will.

• Automated Data Ingestion: Tools that automatically ingest data to improve the speed and quality of background investigations.

3. Cyber and Industrial Security

• Securing the Defense Industrial Base: Protecting cleared facilities and IT systems from cyber attacks, foreign insider threats, and vulnerabilities.

• Behavioral Threat Analysis Capability (BTAC): Enhancing the ability to detect insider threats through advanced behavioral monitoring.

• Zero Trust Architecture: Strengthening cyber posture through modern, secure IT solutions that protect sensitive national security information.

4. Digital Workforce and Governance

• Digital Skills Training: Building a skilled digital workforce, including expanded AI experience and cybersecurity awareness.

• IT Governance: Establishing enterprise-wide IT, data, and cybersecurity governance to ensure compliance and efficiency.

What Counts as a Prototype Project

Under 10 U.S.C. 4022, a prototype project is defined broadly, which is helpful for software and services companies. It includes a proof of concept, model, or process (including a business process), reverse engineering to address obsolescence, a pilot or novel application of commercial technology for defense purposes, agile development activity, the creation, design, development, or demonstration of operational utility, or any combination of these. Adapting an existing commercial product to a DCSA use case qualifies. You do not need to invent something new from scratch.

Who Is Eligible: OTA Eligibility Rules Explained

Prototype OTAs have statutory eligibility conditions. Under 10 U.S.C. 4022, the awardee must meet at least one of the following three conditions.

• (A) Nontraditional participation: At least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participates to a significant extent in the prototype project.

• (B) All small or nontraditional team: All significant participants other than the Federal Government are small businesses (including small businesses in a program under section 9 of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 638) or nontraditional defense contractors.

• (C) One-third cost share: At least one third of total project cost is paid from non-federal sources.

What Is a Nontraditional Defense Contractor?

A nontraditional defense contractor is an entity that is not currently performing, and has not performed for at least one year prior to the solicitation, any DoD contract or subcontract subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). In plain terms, most commercial startups, most venture-backed companies, and most small businesses qualify automatically. If your company has never held a large cost-type DoD contract with full CAS coverage, you are almost certainly nontraditional, and condition (A) or (B) is satisfied without any cost share.

Security Requirements and Foreign Participation

Each Innovation Call specifies whether non-U.S. organizations or individuals may participate and what controls or security regulations apply. Some calls will require a facility clearance or cleared personnel, and some will not. If foreign participation is allowed under a given call, all forms of it must be clearly and fully disclosed in the proposal. For controlled unclassified information (CUI) and classified submissions, that includes disclosing and mitigating any Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) issues before the submission is transmitted to DCSA. Foreign investors on your cap table are not automatically disqualifying, but they must be disclosed and mitigated, and they should be addressed early rather than discovered during negotiation.

Administrative Requirements Before Award

These are checked before an agreement can be executed, not at concept paper stage, but you should start them now because they take time.

• Active SAM.gov registration with a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)

• A CAGE code

• Any facility or personnel security clearances required by the specific Innovation Call

• Registration and active status in the prescribed government invoicing system, such as the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE)

• Not suspended or debarred, and not prohibited by law or Executive Order from receiving an award

• A responsibility determination by the Agreements Officer

• Any Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) addressed and mitigated

Funding Allowance, Cost Share, and What to Put in Your ROM

The Innovation Gateway itself does not publish a dollar ceiling or a fixed award size. This is intentional. Award value is established through your Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) and then negotiated during Phase 3, and individual Innovation Calls may state their own funding parameters or target ranges.

• You set the number. The Solution Concept Paper requires a total ROM plus a high-level cost estimate broken into major phases where applicable, showing project phase, estimated duration, and estimated cost range.

• Affordability is a scored criterion. DCSA evaluates whether the ROM is within an acceptable range for a prototype effort. A ROM that is too high for the scope described is a real rejection risk, and so is one that is obviously too low to deliver what you promised.

• Cost share is generally not required. Cost sharing is not required as a rule. OTs for prototypes require cost share only if the team fails the nontraditional or all-small-business conditions. If the proposing team does not meet those conditions, it must provide at least one third of total cost from its own funds unless a waiver is granted, and waivers are not common and require significant justification.

• Voluntary cost share is encouraged where there is commercial upside. DCSA encourages cost sharing where there is a reasonable probability of commercial application related to the effort. Any cost sharing arrangement should be noted in both the Solution Concept Paper and the Full Project Proposal.

• The real money is often downstream. Under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), a successful prototype can transition to a follow-on production contract or transaction without further competition, covering additional units, scaling of the prototype technology, or implementation of the solution.

Scope your ROM to what can credibly be demonstrated as a prototype, phase it, and treat the prototype as the on-ramp to the production OTA rather than the end state.

How the Process Works: Three Phases

Phase 1: Solution Concept Paper

Vendors submit a 6-page Solution Concept Paper in response to a specific Innovation Call. DCSA reviews every concept paper submitted. Important nuance: this initial review may serve as the sole and entire evaluation. After review, the Government may select the most promising vendors and go straight to Phase 3, invite a limited number of vendors into Phase 2, or decide that no submission is suitable and make no selections.

Phase 2: Full Project Proposal (Optional, Invitation Only)

Selected vendors may receive an official invitation to a second evaluation phase. The invitation defines what is required, and it could be a Full Project Proposal, a technical demonstration, an oral presentation, or some combination. This phase is optional and is conducted only if the Government deems it necessary. Plan for the possibility that your 6 pages are the only thing DCSA ever reads.

Phase 3: Negotiation and Award

Vendors selected from either Phase 1 or Phase 2 proceed to collaborative negotiation. The goal is to jointly establish the framework for the prototype project, which includes refining the technical approach, developing a detailed Statement of Work, establishing well-defined milestones and deliverables, establishing a fair and reasonable price, and agreeing on mutual terms and conditions. The Agreements Officer is the only individual with authority to enter into, modify, or execute a binding agreement on behalf of the Government. Selection does not guarantee an award, and the Government may cancel at any point prior to execution.

Timeline and Key Dates

• June 23, 2026: DCSA Innovation Gateway published. The Gateway is the umbrella announcement, not a submission deadline.

• Ongoing through June 22, 2031: Individual Innovation Calls are published on SAM.gov at various times during the open period, each referencing the Gateway. Each call carries its own problem statement, submission email, deadline, security requirements, and timelines.

• Concept paper window: Set by each Innovation Call. These windows are typically short, which is why preparation before a call drops matters more than reaction speed after it.

• Within 24 hours of submission: All submissions are acknowledged with an email confirmation.

• At 48 hours: If you have not received confirmation, follow up to confirm delivery. DCSA is not responsible for email malfunctions or undeliverable email.

• After Phase 1 review: DCSA notifies vendors of results, including a Phase 2 invitation if applicable. No debriefs or feedback are provided on Phase 1 submissions.

• Phase 3: Negotiation timing varies with scope and complexity, and award occurs when collaborative and administrative activities are complete and funds are available.

The single most useful planning move is to monitor SAM.gov for Innovation Calls referencing HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA, and to have your company information, OTA eligibility certification, IP posture, and ROM structure drafted in advance so that only the problem-specific content needs to be written when a call opens.

What Goes in the 6-Page Solution Concept Paper

Proposers must use the Solution Concept Paper Template (Attachment 1). Any concept paper that does not use the required template will not be considered for review.

Format Rules You Cannot Change

• Page size 8.5 x 11 inches, 1 inch margins, single spacing

• Calibri Light, 11 point, black font in the final document

• Sections 1 through 6 are limited to 6 pages total

• Graphics and illustrations are allowed and are not subject to the format restrictions

• Tables are allowed but are subject to the format restrictions

• An acronym list or glossary is allowed outside the page count

• All grey instruction text in the template must be replaced or deleted before submission

• Altering template settings such as font, font size, line spacing, or margins is prohibited

• Do not include detailed project plans, formal quotes, or team resumes. The concept paper is not a full proposal, and the focus is meant to be exclusively on the quality of the concept.

• Email subject line format: DCSA - Innovation Call [insert #] - Concept Paper [insert Company Name]

Cover Page Contents (Outside the 6-Page Limit)

• Gateway number HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA, Innovation Call number and title

• A descriptive Solution Concept Paper title. Do not simply copy the Innovation Call title.

• Lead organization name, organization type, address, TIN or EIN, UEI, CAGE code, and NAICS code

• Subcontractors with name, email, business type, and CAGE code

• Technical POC (program manager or principal investigator) and administrative POC with full contact details

• Total ROM

• OTA eligibility certification under 10 U.S.C. 4022, with initials next to each applicable condition

• Proprietary data statement and page markings, if you are restricting data

• A table of contents

The Six Required Sections

• 1. Problem Understanding. Clearly describe your understanding of DCSA's operational problem and the desired end state for the user. This is where most commercial companies lose. Generic mission language reads as unfamiliarity. Name the workflow, the user, and the consequence of the status quo.

• 2. Proposed Concept and Vision. A one-page narrative describing your big idea, focused on the unique approach, the user experience, and the strategic value delivered. A simple concept diagram is encouraged, and since graphics are exempt from format restrictions, a strong visual buys you page space.

• 3. High-Level Technical Approach. Briefly outline your technical philosophy and explain why you recommend a particular technology stack, architectural style such as modular or open source, or development methodology such as Agile or DevSecOps for this specific problem. The emphasis is on rationale, not specifications.

• 4. Intellectual Property and Data Rights. State your data rights and licensing posture across three categories. Background IP: identify pre-existing software or algorithms delivered as proprietary background IP and state the specific license terms and user rights granted to the Government to run, integrate, and maintain it. Foreground IP: list proposed rights and license terms for custom software, code adapters, interfaces, or configurations developed under the effort. Dependencies: disclose third-party software, libraries, or data feeds required to sustain the prototype. This section is scored under Concept Viability, so a vague IP answer is a scored weakness, not a formality.

• 5. Risk and Opportunity Spotlight. Identify the single biggest technical or programmatic risk that could jeopardize the project, and the single biggest opportunity the Government might be overlooking. Answer both honestly. A paper that claims no meaningful risk reads as inexperienced.

• 6. Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM). A high-level cost estimate broken into major phases where applicable, with project phase, estimated duration, and estimated cost range, plus any cost share discussion.

How DCSA Evaluates Concept Papers

Concept papers are evaluated on their own merit against the Innovation Call and the criteria below, not against other concept papers submitted to the same call. This is a meaningful advantage. You are not fighting for a fixed number of slots against incumbents. You are clearing a bar.

• Concept Viability: Is the idea innovative, technically sound, and compelling? Are the proposed data rights and licensing viable for long-term integration?

• Mission Alignment: Does the vendor deeply understand the problem and its operational impact?

• Affordability: Is the ROM within an acceptable range for a prototype effort?

Note the phrase in Concept Viability about data rights being viable for long-term integration. DCSA is explicitly screening for lock-in risk. A restrictive license that leaves the Government unable to run, integrate, or maintain the capability can sink an otherwise strong technical concept.

Restrictive Markings, Proprietary Data, and FOIA

Data subject to use restrictions may be included in concept papers but must be clearly marked. You must identify and mark proprietary data intended for Government use only, and identify any technical data or computer software provided with use restrictions. In the absence of that identification, the Government will assume unlimited rights to all technical data and computer software in the concept paper. DCSA intends to treat concept papers as procurement sensitive before award and to disclose contents only to Government employees or designated support contractors for procurement related activities. Classified, sensitive, or critical technology information should not be included in a concept paper. Proposers are cautioned that portions may be subject to release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.

Non-Government advisors under signed NDAs may participate in evaluation of concept papers, full proposals, and negotiations. Submitting an offer constitutes a grant of authority for their use in all phases.

After Award: How Prototype OTAs Actually Run

• Iterative by design. Gateway OTAs are awarded with the intent to use an iterative development approach. The Government and the vendor may mutually agree to modify scope, objectives, and technical requirements during performance.

• Scope can expand without recompete. The agreement allows adapting the prototype based on technical discoveries and test results, expanding scope to address new or refined operational requirements, and implementing those changes within the existing OT without a new competitive action.

• Multiple paths to success. A prototype is successfully completed upon written determination that it met at least one of the following: fulfilled the key technical goals in the Statement of Work, satisfied the objective success metrics in the OT agreement, or achieved a favorable or unexpected result that provides significant operational utility and justifies transition to production.

• Partial completion is allowed. DCSA may declare a specific component successfully completed before the full effort concludes, which lets the Government transition valuable capabilities into production while other parts are still in development.

• Follow-on production without recompete. Under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), a follow-on production contract or transaction may be awarded to prototype participants without further competition, contingent on successful completion to the Government's satisfaction.

Is the DCSA Innovation Gateway Right for Your Startup?

Strong fit signals:

• You sell commercial software, data infrastructure, AI and analytics, identity, or cybersecurity capability that can be adapted to a vetting, insider threat, or industrial security workflow

• You are a small business or nontraditional defense contractor, so no cost share is triggered

• Your architecture is modular and integrates with existing systems rather than requiring a rip and replace

• You can offer the Government license terms that support long-term integration and sustainment

• You want a path into DoD that does not require winning a full FAR-based competition first

Weaker fit signals:

• Hardware-heavy concepts with no clear digital or data integration tie to the four priority areas

• Fully automated trust or adjudication decisions that remove the human from the loop

• Highly proprietary, closed licensing that creates vendor lock-in

• Concepts that solve a single system's problem with no reuse potential across the enterprise

• Companies that cannot meet a clearance requirement if a specific Innovation Call imposes one

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DCSA Innovation Gateway?

The DCSA Innovation Gateway (HS0021-26-CSO-DCSA) is a five-year competitive solicitation from the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency that results in the award of prototype projects through Other Transaction Agreements under 10 U.S.C. 4022. It announces DCSA's general areas of interest and the criteria for selecting Solution Concept Papers. Specific requirements are issued separately through Innovation Calls published on SAM.gov.

How do I apply to the DCSA Innovation Gateway?

You do not apply to the Gateway directly. You respond to a specific Innovation Call published on SAM.gov under the Gateway by emailing a 6-page Solution Concept Paper, using the required template, to the address named in that call, with the subject line format DCSA - Innovation Call [number] - Concept Paper [company name].

Can I submit an unsolicited proposal to DCSA under the Gateway?

No. The Government will only accept proposals submitted in response to an Innovation Call. Unsolicited proposals that are not in response to an Innovation Call will not be reviewed.

How much funding can I receive through a DCSA prototype OTA?

The Gateway does not publish a fixed award ceiling. You propose a total Rough Order of Magnitude cost in the concept paper, broken into phases with estimated durations and cost ranges, and the final value is negotiated during Phase 3. Affordability is an evaluation criterion, so the ROM must be defensible for a prototype effort. Individual Innovation Calls may specify their own funding parameters.

Is cost sharing required for a DCSA prototype OTA?

Cost sharing is not required in most cases. Prototype OTs require cost share only when the team does not include a significantly involved nontraditional defense contractor and is not composed entirely of small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors. In that case, at least one third of total cost must come from non-federal funds unless a waiver is granted, and waivers are uncommon and require significant justification. Voluntary cost share is encouraged where commercial application is likely.

Can a startup with no prior DoD contracts qualify?

Yes, and that is the intent. A nontraditional defense contractor is an entity that is not currently performing, and has not performed for at least one year prior to the solicitation, any DoD contract or subcontract subject to full Cost Accounting Standards coverage. Most commercial startups and small businesses meet that definition, which satisfies OTA eligibility without any cost share.

Do I need a security clearance to submit a concept paper?

It depends on the Innovation Call. Each call specifies its own security requirements, including whether facility or personnel clearances are required and whether non-U.S. organizations or individuals may participate. Clearance requirements are verified before award, so read the specific call carefully before investing in a submission.

Can a foreign-owned or foreign-invested company participate?

Each Innovation Call states whether non-U.S. organizations or individuals may participate. Where participation is allowed, all forms of foreign participation must be clearly and fully disclosed in the proposal, and for CUI or classified submissions any Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence issues must be disclosed and mitigated before the submission is transmitted to DCSA.

How long is the Solution Concept Paper and what format is required?

Sections 1 through 6 are limited to 6 pages, in Calibri Light 11 point, single spaced, with 1 inch margins on 8.5 x 11 inch pages. The required template (Attachment 1) must be used, and a concept paper that does not use the template will not be considered for review. Graphics are exempt from format restrictions, and an acronym list or glossary does not count against the page limit.

What are the evaluation criteria for a Solution Concept Paper?

Three criteria: Concept Viability, meaning whether the idea is innovative, technically sound, and compelling, and whether the proposed data rights and licensing are viable for long-term integration; Mission Alignment, meaning whether the vendor deeply understands the problem and its operational impact; and Affordability, meaning whether the ROM is within an acceptable range for a prototype effort. Papers are judged on their own merit, not against competing submissions.

Will DCSA give me feedback if my concept paper is not selected?

No. DCSA notifies vendors of concept paper evaluation results, but debriefs and feedback on Phase 1 submissions are not provided.

Is Phase 2 guaranteed if my concept paper is strong?

No. The Phase 1 review may serve as the sole and entire evaluation. DCSA may select the most promising vendors and proceed directly to Phase 3 negotiation and award, invite a limited number of vendors to Phase 2, or make no selections at all. Phase 2 is optional and occurs only if the Government deems it necessary.

What happens after a successful prototype project?

Under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), a follow-on production contract or transaction may be awarded to prototype participants without further competition, contingent on successful completion to the Government's satisfaction. Follow-on production may include procurement of additional units, scaling of the prototype technology, or implementation of the solution.

How is this different from SBIR or STTR?

SBIR and STTR are structured research programs with fixed phase sizes, set topic cycles, and statutory small business eligibility. The Innovation Gateway is an Other Transaction vehicle with negotiated scope, negotiated price, negotiated terms, no fixed award size, and a non-competitive path to production. The trade-off is that terms and IP are negotiated rather than standardized, so preparation on data rights matters more. Many companies pursue both, using SBIR for technology maturation and an OTA for mission integration.

What administrative registrations do I need before award?

An active SAM.gov registration with a Unique Entity Identifier, a CAGE code, registration in the prescribed Government invoicing system such as PIEE, any clearances required by the Innovation Call, no suspension or debarment, a favorable responsibility determination by the Agreements Officer, and mitigation of any organizational conflicts of interest.

How BW&CO Helps Companies Win DCSA Prototype OTAs

BW&CO is a non-dilutive funding advisory firm that has helped clients secure more than $350M in government funding. For the DCSA Innovation Gateway, the work starts well before an Innovation Call is published: positioning your technology against the four technical priority areas, confirming your OTA eligibility path, building a defensible ROM and phasing structure, and settling your background and foreground IP posture so that the data rights section strengthens your score instead of weakening it. When a call drops, the window is short, and companies that prepared in advance are the ones that submit something worth reading.

Innovation Funding Simplified. If you are evaluating the DCSA Innovation Gateway or any other defense prototype pathway, contact BW&CO for a funding fit assessment.

AFWERX SBIR Open Topic Program

Updated October 2026: AFWERX SBIR topics now run through the DoW SBIR/STTR releases. FY27 Release 1 opens October 28 and closes November 25, 2026. See our FY27 Release 1 topic guide.

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The AFWERX Open Topic and STRATFI/TACFI programs are designed to help commercial technology companies transition dual-use technologies into Department of the Air Force (DAF) applications. These programs are among the most founder-friendly defense funding pathways because companies propose their own technology solutions rather than responding to narrowly defined technical requirements.

The Open Topic provides multiple entry points:

• Phase I feasibility studies

• Traditional Phase II prototype development

• Direct to Phase II (D2P2) for companies with mature technology and existing Air Force customer relationships

STRATFI/TACFI is intended to help companies bridge the “Valley of Death” between SBIR/STTR Phase II and Phase III commercialization and scaling efforts.

The STRATFI/TACFI PY26.2 Notice of Opportunity is “Coming Soon,” and AFWERX states additional details and submission guidance will be released over the next few weeks. No application deadline is currently specified in the materials provided.

How much funding would I receive?

Open Topic Phase I:

• Maximum award of $75K (SBIR)

• Maximum award of $110K (STTR)

Open Topic Phase II:

• Maximum award of $2M (SBIR)

• Maximum award of $2M (STTR)

Direct to Phase II (D2P2):

• Maximum award of $1.25M (SBIR)

The STRATFI/TACFI follow-on funding provides anywhere from $375k to $15m with private and government matching requirements.

Areas of Interest

Autonomous Mass:

• Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)

• Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS)

• Weapons Technology

Command, Control, & Battle Management:

• Communications, & Battle Management (C3BM)

• Advanced Mission Systems Architecture & Engineering

Counter Incursion:

• Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (cUAS)

• Kinetic/Non-Kinetic Defeat

Agile Combat & Readiness

• Contested Logistics

• Manufacturing & Readiness

Alignment with the DOW’s Critical Technology Areas (CTAs):

• Applied Artifical Intelligence

• Biomanufacturing

• Logistics Technologies

• Battlefield Information Dominance

• Scaled Hypersonics

• Scaled Directed Energy

What could I use the funding for?

Phase I funding is intended to:

• Conduct technical feasibility studies

• Identify a DAF end user and customer

• Secure a signed Customer Memorandum

• Prepare for a Phase II proposal

Phase II funding is intended to:

• Conduct further R&D

• Build and adapt prototypes

• Develop dual-use solutions for Air Force applications

• Work directly with an Air Force Technical Point of Contact (TPOC)

D2P2 funding is intended for companies that:

• Already have a prototype-ready solution

• Have identified an Air Force end user and customer

• Already possess a signed Customer Memorandum

STRATFI/TACFI funding is intended to:

• Bridge the “Valley of Death” between Phase II and Phase III

• Support transition and scaling efforts

• Deliver strategic capabilities for the DAF

Phase III efforts may include:

• Products

• Services

• Research/R&D

• Testing and evaluation

• Production contracts

• Commercialization activities funded by non-SBIR/STTR dollars

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Potential benefits include:

• Direct access to Air Force and Space Force customers

• Ability to transition commercial technology into defense markets

• Opportunity to secure sole-source Phase III awards

• Access to Air Force Technical Points of Contact (TPOCs)

• Potential follow-on commercialization opportunities

AFWERX states that:

• “The Open Topic is the front door to working with the Department of the Air Force.”

• More than 75% of companies received their first Air Force SBIR/STTR contract through AFVentures

• 27% of participating companies are receiving private investments

• Over $1.12B has been executed through AFVentures to date

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Open Topic Phase I:

• Period of Performance: 3 months

Open Topic Phase II:

• Period of Performance: Up to 21 months

Direct to Phase II (D2P2):

• Period of Performance: Up to 21 months

STRATFI/TACFI PY26.2:

• Notice of Opportunity “Coming Soon”

• Additional submission guidance will be released “over the next few weeks”

• No application deadline is specified in the provided materials

AFWERX notes that solicitation dates are subject to change.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from:

• AFWERX

• SpaceWERX

• Department of the Air Force (DAF)

• Air Force SBIR/STTR programs

Phase III efforts specifically must be funded by sources other than SBIR/STTR set-aside funding.

Who is eligible to apply?

Open Topic eligibility is intended for:

• Small businesses

• Companies with dual-use technologies

• Firms capable of supporting Department of the Air Force missions

STRATFI/TACFI eligibility requires ALL of the following:

• Company must qualify as a Small Business Concern (SBC)

• SBC must be eligible for a SBIR/STTR award

• Company must be on an active SBIR/STTR Phase II effort or have completed Phase II within two years of Capability Package submission

• The subject Phase II effort must not already have received a second (“sequential”) Phase II

• At least 90 days must have passed since the beginning of the associated SBIR/STTR Phase II execution

• SBC must not be executing a prior STRATFI effort at the time of submission

• Anticipated work must be performed in the United States

Submission for STRATFI/TACFI must be completed by a Government POC only.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

AFWERX states it is interested in:

• Innovative technology domains with demonstrated commercial value

• Dual-use technologies and solutions

• Technologies that can support Air Force mission needs

• Companies capable of transitioning solutions to warfighters

Strong applicants are likely to have:

• Existing commercial traction

• Identified Air Force customers and end users

• A signed Customer Memorandum

• Clear transition and commercialization plans

• Prototype-ready technology for D2P2 opportunities

For STRATFI/TACFI, companies with active Phase II transition momentum and strong government/customer alignment are likely to be more competitive.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions and requirements include:

• STRATFI/TACFI submissions must be completed by Government POC only

• Incomplete submissions will not be considered

• Phase III efforts cannot be funded with SBIR or STTR dollars

• Phase III work must derive from, extend, or complete prior SBIR/STTR efforts

• Phase III contracts must comply with SBIR/STTR data rights requirements

• D2P2 applicants must demonstrate technical merit and possess a signed Customer Memorandum

The materials also state:

• Phase III contracts may involve non-SBIR/STTR federal funding sources

• Work is anticipated to be performed in the United States

• Sole-source Phase III awards may be made because competition requirements were satisfied during Phase I and II

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify expected application preparation timelines.

However, companies should expect substantial preparation work related to:

• Identifying Air Force end users and customers

• Securing a signed Customer Memorandum

• Preparing technical and commercialization materials

• Coordinating with Government POCs

• Completing submission templates and guidance documentation

STRATFI/TACFI applicants are instructed to:

• Review FAQs and submission checklists

• Review guidance documentation

• Complete required templates

• Submit through the online application system

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can help companies:

• Position commercial technology for AFWERX Open Topic alignment

• Develop compelling dual-use commercialization narratives

• Identify and support Customer Memorandum strategies

• Prepare SBIR/STTR Phase I, Phase II, D2P2, and STRATFI/TACFI applications

• Translate technical capabilities into defense-relevant outcomes

• Build transition and scaling strategies for Phase III opportunities

• Manage submission preparation and compliance requirements

Additional Resources

Review solicitation here.

Department of Education - SBIR/STTR Opportunities (IA, IB, and DT2)

Updated October 2026: This opportunity is closed. 2026 awards were posted September 30, 2026. The next cycle has not been announced yet. Browse currently open opportunities in our funding database.

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Department of Education (ED), through the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), is offering three SBIR funding tracks in 2026: Phase IA, Phase IB, and Direct to Phase II. These programs fund education technology companies at different stages—from early prototype to full-scale commercialization.

• Phase IA: Build a brand-new product (early-stage)

• Phase IB: Improve an existing product (mid-stage)

• Direct to Phase II: Scale a proven innovation (late-stage)

All three tracks are competitive and mutually exclusive (you cannot submit the same or similar proposal across tracks).

Application deadline: June 29, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET) for Phase IA and IB, and June 29, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) for Direct to Phase II.

How much funding would I receive?

• Phase IA: $250,000 for 9 months

• Phase IB: $250,000 for 9 months

• Direct to Phase II: $1,000,000 for 2 years

What could I use the funding for?

Across all three tracks, funding supports:

• Research and development (R&D)

• Product development

• Pilot testing with users

• Data collection and analysis

• Personnel and subcontractors

Key differences:

• Phase IA: Build a new prototype from scratch

• Phase IB: Develop a new component integrated into an existing product

• Direct to Phase II:Scale and commercialize an existing evidence-based innovation

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

• Phase IA and IB awardees can apply for $1,000,000 Phase II funding the following year

• All tracks provide federal validation and commercialization support

• Direct to Phase II provides immediate access to $1M scale funding without Phase I

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Application timeline:

• White Papers per Program: Continuous, after the posting of Q&As (Preferred)

• Full proposals: By invitation only

Process:

1. Submit White Paper

2. Government evaluates for viability

3. If selected → invited to submit full proposal

4. If selected → negotiation → award

Award timing:
Not specified in the solicitation.

Where does this funding come from?

• U.S. Department of Education (ED)

• Institute of Education Sciences (IES)

• Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Who is eligible to apply?

• For-profit small businesses

Track-specific requirements:

• Phase IA: Little or no prior product development

• Phase IB: Must have an existing functioning prototype or product

• Direct to Phase II: Must work with an existing evidence-based innovation developed by a university or nonprofit and include the original researcher on the team

What companies and projects are likely to win?

• Phase IA: Novel, high-risk ideas with strong potential impact

• Phase IB: Companies with working products and a clear, innovative upgrade

• Direct to Phase II: Teams with strong research evidence and a credible plan to scale

Across all tracks:

• Clear problem-solution fit

• Strong research and technical approach

• Path to commercialization

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Cannot submit the same or similar proposal across Phase IA, IB, or Direct to Phase II

• Phase IA: Must be a new, independent product

• Phase IB: New component must be distinct and not a continuation

• Direct to Phase II:

  • Innovation must be originally developed by academic or nonprofit researchers

  • Cannot already be widely deployed at scale

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

• Phase IA / IB: Typically 4–8 weeks

• Direct to Phase II: Typically 6–10+ weeks

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can support:

• Identify the right track (IA vs IB vs Direct to Phase II)

• Position your company and product for competitiveness

• Develop full technical, research, and commercialization narratives

• Build compliant budgets and submission packages

Additional Resources

Review solicitation here.

NRL Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for Basic and Applied Research - Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)

Updated October 2026: Amendment 0007 to the NRL Long Range BAA (N00173-24-S-BA01), issued September 30, 2026, extended white paper acceptance to December 30, 2026.

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) is seeking innovative basic and applied research proposals across a wide range of scientific and engineering disciplines. Organizations can submit White Papers through September 30, 2026, with potential follow-on contracts, grants, or other agreements awarded based on technical merit. This solicitation now operates under ONR's newly released 2026 Science & Technology Strategy — known as "FEED at Speed" (Focus, Explain, Engage, Deploy, at Speed) — which reshapes how proposals will be evaluated and prioritized going forward.

How much funding would I receive?

Est. $500k to $5 million.

What's New: ONR's Strategic Priorities

ONR has signaled a sharper, more disciplined investment posture. Applicants should understand these shifts before submitting:

• "Only ONR" Problems Take Priority. ONR is prioritizing challenges that are both highly transformational and uniquely naval — technology areas the commercial market won't invest in and that no one but ONR will develop. Proposals that read as incremental improvements or dual-use commercial plays (better suited to DIU or DONRCO) will face a tougher bar. Proposals should explicitly argue why this problem is uniquely a Navy/Marine Corps concern.

• 11 S&T Focus Areas Now Anchor the Portfolio. All funded research should map cleanly to one (or more) of ONR's enduring Focus Areas:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomy

  • Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) and Naval Space

  • Directed Energy and Kinetic Systems

  • Materials and Electronics

  • Human and Biological Systems

  • Manufacturing

  • Naval Engineering

  • Naval Aerospace

  • Ocean, Atmosphere, and Space

  • Power and Energy

  • Undersea Systems

  Each Focus Area has subordinate Research Areas (63 total) — proposals should cite the specific Research Area(s) they align to, not just the broader Focus Area.

• Transition Path Is Now a Scoring Factor, Not an Afterthought. ONR's new "Explain" pillar requires every funded program to articulate a credible transition path and map to specific "kill chain effects." Proposals that only describe scientific novelty without a Fleet/Force transition narrative will be weaker competitively. Strong proposals should address: How does this help the Warfighter win?

• AI-Enabled Research Is Explicitly Encouraged. Under the "Speed" pillar, ONR is actively investing in research that uses AI to accelerate discovery itself (not just AI as a subject of study) — including AI-assisted hypothesis generation, automated experimentation, and AI-based validation/red-teaming of results. Proposals that incorporate AI-accelerated methodology into their research approach may align well with this emphasis.

• Outcome-Based Metrics Replace Output-Based Metrics. ONR states it will now measure fielded capability and Warfighter impact rather than papers, prototypes, or activities completed. Proposals should define concrete, measurable outcomes tied to operational advantage, not just deliverables.

• Small Business Programs (SBIR/STTR) Face New Scrutiny for Focus Area Alignment. ONR explicitly flagged SBIR/STTR and Manufacturing Technology programs for tighter alignment with the 11 Focus Areas — meaning off-taxonomy proposals may be deprioritized regardless of technical merit.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding supports basic and applied research aligned with Navy priorities, including (verbatim/high-level categories from the BAA):

• Systems Directorate (e.g., radar, antennas, computational electromagnetics, information systems, AI/ML, human systems integration)

• Materials Science and Component Technology (e.g., energy storage, corrosion, materials processing, bio/chemical detection)

• Ocean and Atmospheric Science (e.g., ocean acoustics, remote sensing, environmental modeling)

• Space Technology (e.g., spacecraft systems, sensors, propulsion, hypersonics)

Specific topic areas include (selected verbatim examples):

• “Virtual simulations and mixed reality systems… situational awareness, and training”

• “Data management and exploitation technologies that apply emerging mathematics and machine learning techniques”

• “Multi-agent and multi-robot systems, reinforcement learning, game theory”

• “Electrochemical energy storage and conversion systems such as batteries and fuel cells”

• “Optical sciences… lasers, sensors, and photonic technologies”

• “Cyber security, cryptographic technologies, and high assurance computing”

• “Spacecraft payloads; spacecraft propulsion systems; advanced materials for spaceflight use”

Many More Topics are listed in the Solicitation (See below).

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the formal funding award, there are significant indirect benefits:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Being selected by the Naval Research Laboratory signals strong technical credibility and alignment with U.S. Navy and DoD priorities.

Access to Defense Ecosystem:
Awardees gain exposure to Navy researchers, program managers, and potential transition partners across defense and aerospace.

Flexible Contracting Pathways:
The BAA allows for multiple award mechanisms (contracts, grants, OTAs), enabling faster and more flexible engagement than traditional procurement.

Follow-On Funding Opportunities:
Successful projects may lead to additional funding phases or expanded research programs based on performance.

Increased Strategic Positioning:
Participation positions companies for future DoD funding, partnerships, and potential acquisition interest.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

• White Papers Due: September 30, 2026 (4:00 PM EDT)

• Rolling evaluation and invitation for full proposals after White Paper review

• Funding timing varies based on evaluation and award negotiations

Where does this funding come from?

Department of Defense (DoD) → Department of the Navy → Office of Naval Research (ONR) → Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)

Who is eligible to apply?

• Educational institutions

• Small businesses

• Small disadvantaged businesses

• Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)

• Minority institutions

• Other qualified organizations

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Selections are based on:

• Technical merit and scientific quality of the proposed approach

• Relevance to NRL research priorities

• Potential benefit to the Government relative to cost

• Feasibility and innovation of the solution

• Cost realism and overall value

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Must submit a White Paper first before a full proposal

• Some topics may require security clearances or classified work

• Awards depend on availability of funding

• Government may select all, some, or none of proposals

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

1. Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

2. Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

3. Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

We have both fractional engagements ($250 an hour) and full engagements ($15,000 + 5%) available.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Below is a brief summary. Please check the full solicitation before applying (link in resources section).

Executive Summary:

The Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) is seeking research proposals for innovative technologies that improve military training systems, simulation, and training methodologies. The opportunity is released as Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) N61340-26-S-0001.

Funding is available for basic and applied research related to training simulation technology, including areas such as adaptive training systems, simulation technologies, computer applications, and STEM education programs. The Navy is specifically interested in research that advances training effectiveness, simulation fidelity, distributed training systems, human performance modeling, and related technologies.

Unlike traditional grants with a fixed deadline, proposals can be submitted on a rolling basis until the BAA expires.

Application Deadline: 25 January 2031.

Companies, universities, nonprofits, and research organizations with innovative training technology concepts should consider engaging early with NAWCTSD technical points of contact to determine potential interest before submitting a full proposal.

How much funding would I receive?

The funding amount normally ranges between $500k - $5m

Awards will be determined based on:

• Scientific and technical merit

• Importance to Navy programs

• Availability of funding

• Reasonableness and realism of cost

The solicitation states that contracts may be issued for research proposals but does not specify the number of awards or typical award size.

What could I use the funding for?

Funding supports research and development related to training systems and simulation technologies that improve Navy training effectiveness.

The BAA identifies four major research areas:

1. Training Technology and Methodology
Examples include:

• Adaptive simulation-based training and assessment

• Advanced distributed learning

• Human social cultural and behavioral modeling

• Intelligent tutoring systems

• Games and gaming for training

• Team training and performance measurement

• Leadership development

• Mobile learning technologies

• Performance measurement for training

• Maintenance training technologies

2. Simulation Systems
Examples include:

• Display projector technology

• Helmet-mounted displays

• Live/Virtual/Constructive (LVC) training integration

• Sensor simulation technology

• Vehicle dynamic simulation

• Visual simulation technology

3. Computer Applications
Examples include:

• Human behavioral representation

• Anti-submarine warfare and submarine operations modeling

• Simulation networking

• Speech recognition technology

• High performance computing

• Reusable software for training systems

4. STEM Education
Examples include:

• K-12 STEM outreach activities

• Curriculum development for STEM education

• Programs connecting DoD scientists and engineers with schools

• Activities encouraging student participation in STEM fields relevant to DoD missions

Projects should be investigative and explore innovative technology concepts. Development of specific hardware systems is not allowed under this BAA.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Potential additional benefits include:

• Collaboration with NAWCTSD scientists and engineers

• Opportunity to transition technologies into Navy training systems

• Potential follow-on research opportunities

• Participation in a program focused on advancing next-generation military training technologies

Collaborative arrangements between universities and industry are encouraged.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Proposals may be submitted at any time while the BAA is active.

Application Deadline: 25 January 2031

The recommended process includes four steps:

Step 1 – Technical Dialog (Email Communication)
Initial discussion with a Navy technical point of contact.

Step 2 – Technical Dialog (Informal White Paper)
The Government may request an informal white paper to assess technical merit.

Step 3 – Submission of Formal Research Proposal
If the concept is of interest, the contracting office may issue a request for a formal proposal.

Step 4 – Contract Award for Selected Projects

Evaluation process:

• Initial review to assess scientific merit, relevance, and funding availability

• Peer review of proposals not declined in the initial review

The solicitation states that:

• Initial review generally occurs within 60 days after receipt

• Full processing of proposals may take up to 120 days

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) within the U.S. Department of the Navy.

The BAA is issued under:

• Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 35.016

• FAR 6.102(d)(2)

The Navy may use contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements depending on the nature of the research.

Who is eligible to apply?

The solicitation states that NAWCTSD contracts with:

• Educational institutions

• Nonprofit organizations

• Private industry

Organizations must meet minimum standards related to:

• Financial resources

• Ability to comply with the performance schedule

• Technical skills

• Facilities and equipment

• Organizational integrity and operational controls

Small businesses, nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and small disadvantaged businesses are encouraged to submit proposals.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Proposals are evaluated using the following criteria (listed in descending order of importance):

1. Proposed Research

   • Scientific and technical merit

   • Adequacy and effectiveness of the technical approach

2. Potential Contribution

   • Contribution to the Navy mission

   • Alignment with NAWCTSD training system research priorities

3. Offeror’s Qualifications

   • Capabilities, facilities, and technical expertise

4. Personnel

   • Qualifications and experience of key personnel

5. Past Performance

   • Record of performance on similar efforts

6. Cost Realism

   • Reasonableness of proposed costs and fees

Projects should focus on innovative research that advances training systems technology and provides insight for optimizing the use of training systems.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key restrictions include:

• Proposed efforts must be investigative research exploring innovative technology concepts

• Development of specific hardware systems is not allowed

• Only a Contracting Officer may obligate the Government to expend funds

• Non-U.S. citizens may not participate if the research involves:

  • Critical technology

  • Sensitive unclassified information

  • Classified information

  • For Official Use Only material

Research proposals may have a period of performance up to five (5) years.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

The solicitation does not specify a required preparation timeline.

However, the process typically includes:

• Initial technical dialogue

• Possible white paper submission

• Full research proposal preparation

Preparing a formal research proposal generally requires assembling:

• Technical research plan

• Administrative documentation

• Detailed cost proposal

How can BW&CO help?

BW&CO can support companies through the full BAA submission process, including:

• Identifying promising research concepts aligned with NAWCTSD priorities

• Drafting white papers for early technical engagement

• Preparing compliant technical research proposals

• Structuring the cost proposal and administrative documentation

• Managing communication with NAWCTSD technical contacts

• Positioning the project to align with the evaluation criteria used by Navy reviewers

How much would BW&CO Charge?

We have both fractional engagements ($250 an hour) and full engagements ($15,000 + 5%) available.

Additional Resources

Review the solicitation here.

DLA Military Unique Sustainment Technology III (MUST-III) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Updated October 2026: Amendment 0003 (August 13, 2026) reopened the MUST III BAA (SP4701-26-B-0001) for white papers. It stays open through December 2, 2030.

Executive Summary:

The Defense Logistics Agency’s MUST-III BAA provides up to $50M over five years for R&D that improves the military’s clothing and equipment manufacturing ecosystem. Companies may apply during the initial 45-day window (through Jan 16, 2026) for IDIQ consideration, or later through rolling White Paper submissions once the BAA reopens.

How much funding would I receive?

The BAA does not specify individual award ceilings, but it does specify:

• Total available program funding: up to $50M over 5 years.

• Awards are issued as cost-type contracts, which commonly support multi-hundred-thousand- to multi-million-dollar R&D projects.

• Each Short-Term Project (STP) is typically 3–24 months.

Historically, DLA ManTech STPs are substantial technical efforts—often sized to fully execute a discrete R&D solution (e.g., digital thread capability, manufacturing prototype, supply chain modeling tool).

What could I use the funding for?

Projects must align with one of the three Technical Areas of Interest:

• Digital as an authoritative source

  Establishing a single, trusted digital version of clothing and individual equipment specifications, manufacturing data, and sourcing details to reduce errors, increase speed, and enable automation throughout the supply chain.

  o This includes transitioning from traditional technical documents to digital data as the primary source of truth, ensuring all design, sourcing, and production information is timely, accurate consistent, accessible, and secure.

  o Emphasis should be placed on integrating model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and digital thread technologies. This transformation should rely on IT architectures that support interoperability, cybersecurity, and protection of intellectual property.

  o Advanced technologies such as augmented reality, AI, and machine learning could be utilized to bridge business and technical workflows, enhancing accuracy and operational efficiency.

  o Establishing secure, “time of need” information sharing capability e.g. Application Program Interfaces to enable distribution of technical data over the product lifecycle.

• Supply chain resilience in clothing and individual equipment

  Developing and demonstrating adaptive manufacturing capabilities and buffer strategies—like material stockpiles or alternate sourcing—that help the industry continue operating during surge requirements, large-scale conflicts, disasters, or disruptions.

  o Research in this area could focus on mapping supply chains, identifying critical bottlenecks, or developing models to simulate and respond to various disruptions. Tools like digital twin simulations of the supply chain and predictive analytics could be utilized to proactively address labor shortages, material delays, and capacity issues.

  o Researchers might also examine how to incorporate surge readiness, excess capacity strategies, and prepositioned material stockpiles to ensure stability in times of crisis.

  o Supplier categorization using digital platforms could support diversified sourcing and highlight alternative production pathways when traditional channels are compromised.

  o Develop capabilities to manufacture for low-volume or “made to measure” items, cost effectively with the very short lead-time needed to meet mission requirements (e.g. training goals).

• Innovation in clothing and individual equipment

  Encouraging research and development in novel materials, garment designs, and production methods (e.g. 3D knitting, advanced wearables, automated sewing) to enhance the performance, comfort, and scalability of military clothing and individual equipment.

  o Efforts should prioritize interfacing and coordinating with the Military Services on the development of cutting-edge textile technologies, next-generation uniform systems. This includes advanced manufacturing techniques. containerized and point-of-need manufacturing capabilities that allow rapid setup and deployment in remote or austere environments.

  o Research to encourage exploration into wearable technologies, self-healing fabrics, and automated production techniques such as 3D knitting and robotics. Digital representations of product lifecycles and materials performance, paired with a workforce trained in AI and digital tools, will ensure that new capabilities are both scalable and resilient.

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond direct funding, companies gain several strategic advantages:

Government Validation & Credibility
Selection under DLA’s Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) program is a strong technical endorsement. This validation can accelerate partnerships with primes, OEMs, and investors who trust government-vetted innovation.

Visibility & Industry Notoriety
Awardees participate in DLA working groups and may be highlighted in federal program materials—raising national profile within the defense textile and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

Access to DLA Experts & Ecosystem Collaboration
IDIQ awardees join a 5-year Working Group, providing direct collaboration with DLA program managers, CIE stakeholders, and other innovators—unlocking future contracting and transition opportunities.

Stronger Long-Term Valuation & Exit Potential
Advancing technology under nondilutive federal funding de-risks the product roadmap and strengthens valuation in future equity rounds or acquisition discussions—especially with defense, apparel manufacturing, or automation companies.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Initial Deadline:

• Full technical & cost proposals due January 16, 2026 (45 days after Dec 2, 2025 posting).

• These proposals are for IDIQ contract consideration.

After Initial Period:

• The BAA temporarily closes for evaluation.

• It then reopens for rolling White Paper submissions for the remainder of the 5-year period.

Award Timing:

• After evaluation, DLA notifies offerors of selection.

• Task orders (STPs) may or may not be immediately issued to IDIQ holders.

• Additional STPs may be awarded after White Papers → requested proposals → evaluation cycle.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) under the Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Program.

Who is eligible to apply?

Any responsible U.S. source capable of meeting government requirements, including:

• Large businesses

• Small businesses (including WOSB, HUBZone, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB)

• Nonprofits

• Universities / Minority Institutions

• HBCUs

There is no set-aside.
Must meet minimum standards in: financial resources, accounting system adequacy, technical capabilities, past performance, and compliance with FAR Part 9.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

Competitive applicants typically include companies with:

• Expertise in digital engineering, textile manufacturing, AI/ML, automation, or supply chain analytics.

• Demonstrated DoD or CIE manufacturing experience (digital data, prototyping, supply chain modeling).

• Capabilities aligned tightly to Technical Areas of Interest.

• Strong past performance and ability to transition solutions into the production environment.

Examples of strong project types:

• Digital twin implementation for apparel manufacturing

• Secure digital technical data environment (authoritative source of truth)

• Surge production capability modeling

• Automated sewing or 3D knitting demonstrations

• Wearable sensor textiles

• AI-enabled supply chain forecasting for CIE items

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

Key requirements include:

• Cybersecurity compliance (DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171, CMMC).

• No compensation for proposing STPs (including White Papers).

• Subcontracting plans required for large businesses on proposals > $750,000.

• Projects must be executed within U.S. regulations for export controls, IP, and data rights.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a full proposal under this opportunity will likely take 150-200 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Resources

See the full solicitation here.

DARPA Strategic Technology Office-Wide Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

Updated October 2026: DARPA STO replaced its BAA with an office-wide Innovation Solutions Opening (DARPA-PS-26-09), which accepts submissions through December 18, 2026.

Executive Summary:

DARPA’s Strategic Technology Office (STO) BAA is soliciting breakthrough research concepts that create new mission-level capabilities beyond the current state of practice. The agency will fund a limited number of high-risk, high-reward proposals across a broad range of defense and national-security technical domains. Applications are due December 19, 2025.

How much funding would I receive?

DARPA does not publish fixed award amounts for this BAA. STO funds a limited number of proposals, and budgets are determined by the technical approach, the scope of work, and alignment with STO priorities.

What could I use the funding for?

DARPA's STO seeks innovative ideas and disruptive technologies that provide the U.S. military and national security leaders with trusted, disruptive capabilities across all physical domains (Air, Space, Sea, and Land) and across the spectrum of competition. STO programs deliver solutions at speed and scale for today's warfighters while developing the resilient "breakthrough" systems and technologies needed for future battlespaces. STO does not focus on one area of responsibility or phenomenology. Rather, STO programs capture the strategic, logistical, and tactical complexity of today's national security environments. STO is a "systems office" seeking to create new "proof-of-concept" mission systems. Its goals are to develop and demonstrate new capabilities that expand what is technically possible.

Research areas of current interest to STO include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

•  Acoustic communication and sensing

•  Adaptability

•  Advanced computing

•  Additive manufacturing

•  Architecture and advanced systems engineering

•  Artificial intelligence

•  Autonomy and control algorithms

•  "Big data" analytics

•  Combat identification

•  Command and control (C2)

•  Communications and networking, virtual and adaptive

•  Complexity management

•  Critical infrastructure defense

•  Decision aids and C2 technology

•  DevOps and novel software development and integration

•  Directed energy (DE)

•  Distributed autonomy and teaming (machine-machine, human-machine)

•  Economic security

•  Effects chain functions (disaggregated find, fix, finish, target, engage, assess)

•  Electro-optic/infrared sensors

•  Electromagnetic warfare (EW)

•  High-frequency (HF) communications and sensing

•  High voltage electric power systems and architecture

•  Human behavior modeling

•  Human-machine symbiosis

•  Industrial engineering

•  Integration and reliability technologies

•  Interoperability

•  Logistics

•  Modeling and simulation

•  Microwave and millimeter wave communications and sensing

•  Novel kinetic effects

•  Non-kinetic effects (EW, DE, cyber)

•  Optical technologies

•  Photonics

•  Radio technologies (especially software-defined and novel waveforms and processing)

•  Radar and adaptive arrays

•  Resilient systems

•  Robotics

•  Seekers and other expendable sensors and processing

•  Sensors and analytics

•  Signal processing

•  Space sensors, communications, autonomy, and architectures (especially supporting proliferated low earth orbit constellations)

•  Strategy analysis technology

•  Supply chain analytics

•  System of systems

•  Undersea and seabed technology

•  Tactics development technology

•  Testing and data collection

•  Very low earth orbit (VLEO) technology

•  Very low frequency (VLF) technology

Are there any additional benefits I would receive?

Beyond the direct award, DARPA funding offers significant strategic advantages:

Government Validation and Credibility:
Receiving a DARPA award signals exceptional scientific and engineering merit, which accelerates engagement with primes, integrators, strategic partners, and investors.

Enhanced Visibility and Notoriety:
DARPA programs are frequently highlighted in federal communications, technical conferences, and defense media—boosting your company’s profile across the national security sector.

Ecosystem Access and Collaboration Opportunities:
Awardees gain access to DARPA program managers, government labs, test ranges, and a high-level innovation network—opening doors to future contracts and partnerships.

Stronger Exit and Acquisition Potential:
Nondilutive funding that matures breakthrough technology, combined with the DARPA “stamp,” often increases valuation and attractiveness to large defense, aerospace, semiconductor, and AI-focused acquirers.

What is the timeline to apply and when would I receive funding?

Applications are due December 19, 2025.

DARPA does not publish a fixed award timeline.

Where does this funding come from?

Funding comes from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Strategic Technology Office (STO), a DoD organization responsible for advanced mission-level systems and emerging technologies.

Who is eligible to apply?

The BAA does not restrict eligibility. Typical DARPA BAAs accept proposals from:

• U.S. businesses of any size

• Universities

• Nonprofits

• Federally-funded research and development centers (with limitations)

Foreign entities may be subject to additional restrictions depending on classification and export-control considerations.

What companies and projects are likely to win?

DARPA will select proposals that score highly on scientific merit, mission relevance, and cost realism.

• High Scientific & Technical Merit: Innovative, feasible, and well-justified approaches with clear deliverables, identified risks and credible mitigations, and a team with the expertise to execute.

• Strong Contribution to DARPA’s Mission: Efforts that meaningfully advance U.S. national security capabilities, show a credible transition path to U.S. defense applications, and include an IP strategy that does not hinder government use.

• Realistic, Well-Substantiated Costs: Budgets that accurately reflect the level of effort, materials, labor, and technical scope—avoiding artificially low estimates and demonstrating efficient use of prior research and existing capabilities.

Are there any restrictions I should know about?

• Proposals must not duplicate existing STO programs or other active STO BAAs.

• Research that yields incremental or “evolutionary” improvements is specifically excluded.

• Offerors are strongly encouraged to review current STO programs and speak with program managers before applying.

How long will it take me to prepare an application?

For a first-time applicant, preparing a competitive submission under this BAA will likely take 120–160 hours in total.

How can BW&CO help?

Our team specializes in complex federal R&D proposals and can:

• Triple your likelihood of success through proven strategy and insider-aligned proposal development

• Reduce your time spent on the proposal by 50–80%, letting your team focus on technology and operations

• Ensure you are targeting the best opportunity for your project and positioning your company for long-term growth under Federal & State R&D Initiatives.

How much would BW&CO Charge?

Our full service support is available for a flat fee of $15,000 Project + a 5% Success Fee.

Fractional support is $300 per hour, with most DARPA proposal projects requiring 80–100 hours of expert support from strategy through submission of full proposal.

For startups, we offer a discounted rate of $250 per hour to make top-tier grant consulting more accessible while maintaining the same level of strategic guidance and proposal quality.

Additional Resources

See solicitation on sam.gov